Jump to content

User talk:E.M.Gregory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Tag: MassMessage delivery
→BLP DS notice: new section
Tag: contentious topics alert
Line 543: Line 543:
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Insertcleverphrasehere@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=852118327 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Insertcleverphrasehere@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=852118327 -->

== BLP DS notice ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect: any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or any [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

Revision as of 14:57, 5 August 2018

For the Wikipedia encyclopedia article, see Reader.
It is The Reader that we should consider on every edit we make to Wikipedia.

(Thanks to Alan Liefting)‎

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

Hello E.M.Gregory:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – North America1000 14:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Audubon Mural Project

Congratulatiions on your excellent work and beating me to the punch. I might do a couple of the artist's pages whose work is included in the project. If you have the time it might be good to list in a new section of the mural project page all tbe artists whose work is included. Thanks again stupendous. Masterknighted (talk) 02:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, User:Masterknighted, I'd love to cooperate with you on this.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Finding content for Presidential Village - thanks

I know you get a lot of grief for...stuff...concerning AfDs, but I wanted to thank you for finding an obscure citation for the Presidential Village article (even though it was my nominiation). I paid to get the entire 1909 newspaper article. It was unknown to the town's historical society, and is helping fill in historical gaps. David notMD (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Western guilt (concept) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western guilt (concept) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western guilt (concept) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFD Discussion

User:E.M.Gregory, there is currently a discussion on whether or not an article that I created should be deleted; see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish etiquette. The issues that were initially raised which prompted the request for deletion have since been addressed and corrected. If you think the article is now worthy of being retained, please voice your opinion by writing "Keep." Thanks.Davidbena (talk) 02:51, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fwiw, this is very clear canvassing. E.M.Gregory you should probably not go !vote now. Jytdog (talk) 03:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if it is viewed as "canvassing," rather than a "friendly notice," I would also advise him not to post any comment there. Be well.Davidbena (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is not even a little ambiguous. Jytdog (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, with my latest comment, it should be clear that I am only interested in his honest opinion, or none at all. G-d bless.Davidbena (talk) 19:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, E.M.Gregory.

I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My behavior

You have seen me participating in AfDs of terrorism. If you have some free time then please consider adding your comments on my behavior. Thanks. Störm (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy turkey day

Northamerica1000 is wishing you a happy Thanksgiving. If you don't celebrate Thanksgiving, don't forget that "Any time is turkey time" (see image). North America1000 06:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hello E.M.Gregory. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAGE_(organisation)

Thanks for words of support. I had been violently attacked for providing information available on Cage own web page! The content of the page actually is based of POV of the editors, not on factual evidence. They presumed that Cage is not lead by bunch of extreme Islamists that aim at paralysis of West effort fighting Islamic terror against the evidence. Charity organization CAGE demands withdrawal of UN troops from Africa! What kind of charity is it? CAGE is only showcase of inability of Western legal system to deal with political wing of the Islamists. Cautious (talk) 10:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming good faith

Hello! You seem like a nice person but you have changed my signature into something that claims I'm an SPA. You also made the edit summary comment "puppet". Please see WP:AGF and WP:NPA. Please assume good faith. If you had bothered to look at my contribs, you would see that I am not an SPA. Badgering people who make a fair point is not in the spirit of the encyclo. 198.58.171.47 (talk) 15:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Me again, the IP (mY IP reset). You have zero evidence of any ill activity on my part-- because there is none. Also, your argument is lousy: you edited those pages as well, which are "two of the most IP, sock and meatpuppet-laden pages that it has ever been my misfortune to happen on." Wikipedia has a policy of assuming good faith for a reason. Calling people sockpuppets and meatpuppets without any evidence is just sad, and a very weak form of ad hominem argument. Stop with the name calling. 104.163.155.42 (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delsort

Hi, Just letting you know you might want to add delsort to your scripts. Then, at each AFD you can sort just by clicking on the delsort tab and typing in all the different categories. You can read how to do it at: User:Enterprisey/delsortSir Joseph (talk) 20:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, E.M.Gregory. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1768 establishments in New York (state)

Hi, would you object to my moving Category:1768 establishments in New York (state) to Category:1768 establishments in New York? This should fix the current red links; and neighbouring categories do not use "(state)" until 1776, see Category:Establishments in New York (state) by year. (Procedurally, with your consent, I can move the page under WP:C2E.) – Fayenatic London 23:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar fix

My latest additions probably need some grammar fixes thanks.--Shrike (talk) 12:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I would advice you to self-revert your latest revert. If you have an issue with providing a page number to verify the citation, take it to the talk page.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Did you just lure me into doing 3 reverts because you were tag-teaming to remove a perfectly valid source at Antisemitism in the Labour Party? Never mind, I can see that yoru did. Did you read the book? Did you look for the page number? I read it lase fall and I know who I lent my copy to. there must be a proverb about loaned books that never return. I added this source to The Left's Jewish Problem back when I created that page, And, true, I did not use a page number. Instead I sourced it to a book review. I have asked you to stop harassing me before, and I sincerely wish that you would.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I actually hate fishing but that's besides the point. You included the improperly cited book yet you want me to go and find the synthed material for you in that said book? It is up to you to back any contributions with reliable and properly cited sources. Now please stop playing a victim and either fix yet another mistake or reapply the tag until you or, more realistically, someone else can.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • So I should AGF for an editor who deliberately misrepresents sources, engages in synth, bludgeons everyone they disagree with, accuses anyone who brings these claims to attention of harassing them, says I think less of the Jewish people (with no idea of my religious beliefs or background), and, most recently, makes "contributions" with incomplete citations? Sure I'll AGF but remember it isn't a suicide pact. Have a good evening.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

7700 16th Street NW

FYI: WP:Articles for deletion/7700 16th Street NW — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thank you for your input. And yes, also comparing AfD rationales as suggested by the nominator are very subjective. You can find some sentence that looks the same etc. But so can be said about hundreds of other rationales for other editors probably. There are basically no case here. Anyways I will try to move on from it and ignore it further. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wise.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

7700 16th Street NW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Black Muslims
Antisemitism in the Labour Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jeffrey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2017 New York City attempted bombing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 New York City attempted bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 New York City attempted bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Have a Merry Christmas ---- ChocolateRabbit 05:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello E.M.Gregory, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Rorer

Do you have his birth date and death location from the obit? Are you able to download it? I want to add it to Familysearch and update Wikidata with the information. Do you have an account at Familysearch? --RAN (talk) 17:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HEY, expanding article from the obit now. You might think about requesting access to a good news archive, Wikipedia has the power ot enable that for editors.RANE.M.Gregory (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Which available through Wikipedia news service do you recommend? --RAN (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea. I just know that this sort of access exists. I usually use proquest, to which I have access. But I don't even know it it is one of the services available to Wikipedia editors.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you need more help researching the biographies that Rusf10 nominated AFDs from this week, let me know, I think there are 10 in the AFD queue, someone will have to check the contribution history. All his recent contributions are to AFD, so maybe he does not have access to reference works. Let me know, and I will work on them before vacation. --RAN (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bristol Bill

At a recent AfD, you expressed interest in this page, should I ever write it. I'm travelling over the next few weeks, and have gone ahead and uploaded my draft, which isn't quite as cleaned up as I might like, but is probably at a stage where it is not a net-negative for the project. If you are interested, I hope you read and enjoy it. Smmurphy(Talk) 07:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Fabian Gonzalez

Jesus Fabian Gonzalez needs some expansion, and incorporation into wildfire article which currently make no mention of any arson arrests. There appears to be a strong effort to whitewash this incident as not notable and not massive cover up on the part of officials and media of what could possibly be an act of domestic terrorism, and release of a dangerous immigrant. Bachcell (talk) 15:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Jesus Fabian Gonzalez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesus Fabian Gonzalez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Fabian Gonzalez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. (left by graceful slick on my page) Bachcell (talk) 01:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello E.M.Gregory, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018.
Happy editing,
Chris Troutman (talk) 00:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello E.M.Gregory, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Translation of Luciabeslutet

Hi!

I noticed you removed my sentence about sv:Luciabeslutet from immigration to Sweden. I don't think you suggest that is was not relevant, but that you think it was not translated correctly, please feel free to provide a better translation.--Immunmotbluescreen (talk) 13:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it has ever been translated before. At least it is known as Luciabeslutet (the decision on Saint Lucy day) in media[1], but it also have a more formal name in the Riksdag (proposition XYZ). I was going to add a source, but then I got distracted by some trolls.
I am also trying to crowd source the missing history section (1991-2006), if you have opinions on what it should include (I can probably find the correct sources), feel free to join the discussion. --Immunmotbluescreen (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CMOM

Quick question on this edit, assume you mean 2021, not 2011? Wanted to check before I fixed, in case I was missing something. StarM 16:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. NYT site was having a moment so couldn't confirm whether it was simply a digit off or a different year. StarM 23:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Slatersteven (talk) 13:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Press coverage

Hello!

Please take a note of the EdSum here:[2]. You did a similar thing on the 2017 page, which I corrected then. The articles you added didn´t actually show up on the saved page. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Belated best wishes for a happy 2018

The Fox Hunt (1893) by Winslow Homer, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.

== BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for creating the article Antifa (United States) by taking advantage of part of what was eliminated in Nazism in the United States. Att 2804:14C:5BB5:8FFF:C11C:B18D:DC2B:B0A5 (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello E.M.Gregory, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

International coverage

I would like to ponder "international". This being the English Wikipedia, I do not think one necessarily needs international coverage to establish notability. Clearly there are many articles that are relevant only to the U.S., in fact, many are relevant only to any given state of the Union, and only with local sources, and yet they make the Wiki. I am fairly sure the same could be said of many articles about Australia, or New Zealand, England, or Scotland, or what have you. So if we take a British issue, I would think if one has several WP:RS as sources, and especially the BBC (which is national media in the UK, as are others), then that establishes notability for the UK, and UK notability is sufficient for a UK article, don't you think?

Now, a corollary to the above might be lands where the language is not English... so, perhaps on an article about Israel, in the English Wiki, local sources (in Hebrew, Ladino, Russian, Yiddish, English, or what have you) are not sufficient? Perhaps in this latter case we do need international sources? Anyway, just speculating. Maybe you have looked into this in the past and can cite policy? Thanks in advance for any thoughts. XavierItzm (talk) 07:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HTML hints

In your edit of 23:13, 21 February 2018 of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spark: A Mother's Story of Nurturing Genius, you closed a <small> tag with <small/>. Note that a slash at the beginning of an HTML tag means "close the corresponding tag", while a slash at the end of an HTML tag means "open and close this tag in one operation". This is known as a self-closed tag. When Wikipedia finds a self-closed tag where a closing tag is expected, it usually converts it automatically to the corresponding closing tag, but this is treated as a lint error of type self-closed tag, and will cause problems when Wikipedia migrates from HTML4 to HTML5. I edited the page, changing <small>...<small/> to <small>...</small>. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chola art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian Art Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfD at Levi Sanders

Hi E.M.Gregory, it appears that you haven't completed the nomination correctly, as displayed in the AfD log. Could you please check it and rectify. I'm on a mobile device and it'd be difficult for me to do it myself. Thanks,MT TrainTalk 19:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The BLP Barnstar
For your work on numerous BLP articles. And for your tireless participation in AfDs and great rationales. , Thanks! BabbaQ (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tara Westover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tara Westover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara Westover until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Umar Haque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sara Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLP-PROD

Hello, BLP-PROD is used when there is a BLP article without any sources. It is not a statement on the notability of the subject or anything else, it is simply WP policy regarding unsourced BLP's. For future reference, the template should not be removed until at least one reliable source has been added. Thanks! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:00, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • My edit comment, "(daughter of the Veep; with a bluelinked children's picture book out this week. Despite lack of sourcing, a Prod seems inappropriate.)" on removing this Prod at Charlotte Pence at a heated political moment related to bunny, rabbits, Trump, Pence, John Oliver and the use of Wikipedia in political battles. Sometimes we abandon all rules just to keep things civil. Page was speedily sourced, long before this unnecessary comment was left on my page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 03:13, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello E.M.Gregory, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Organization of Iranian American Communities

Hi E.M.Gregory - about your AfD comment on this page, I have also found that the nominator has long history of non neutral (attack) edits on the People's Mujahedin of Iran page. I've tried to clean up some of it but it's proving impossible as Pahlevun keeps reverting my edits. Could you have a look at this please and share your thoughts on weather you think reverting to an earlier version and protecting the page would be a viable solution? Thank you. London Hall (talk) 15:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Article Rescue Barnstar
is here by awarded to E.M.Gregory for his exemplary efforts in rescuing articles at Articles For Deletion in particular Sharon Statement. – Lionel(talk) 08:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ramallah Porn

The link provided says I cannot edit articles relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict not that I cannot vote whether to keep them or not.ApolloCarmb (talk) 12:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sutton Hoo Helmet (sculpture) merger proposal

Hello, E.M.Gregory. You have new messages at Talk:Rick Kirby#Merger from Sutton Hoo Helmet (sculpture).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bejnar (talk) 16:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Samoon Ahmad,MD - deleted page

Thank you for feedback on the page noted, however, your points of reasoning (summarized in your last comment line)could be justified without the harsh overtones and simplification of achievements, etc. - I noticed that other users on the discussion page were quite respectful. Regardless perhaps it is your communication style and I won't take offense. I will ask for a review of the page in the future should new information with solid references come available and work on the page thru the Tea House. Editing other pages will also help me gain insight. Thanks again,MegEng (talk) 04:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All Systems Down (novel)

E.M., Could you weigh in on this Afd? Very much appreciated! Bmax52 (talk) 17:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Killing of Alexander Levlovich has been accepted

Killing of Alexander Levlovich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Criminal rock throwing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criminal rock throwing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criminal rock throwing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello E.M.Gregory, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

  • Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

  • A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

  • There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

  • Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

  • The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

  • Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
  • The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Before?

I am stretching my good faith to the brink here. Your recent tagging of The Color of Olives and Speed Sisters for notability, when performing a basic before search would easily find reliable sources, is discouraging.

You know darn well the condition of an article is not an indicator of notability, existing coverage is. I am going to pretend you are having an off-day, but please perform searches in the future–for all topics.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • a note my favorite WP:HOUND. I tagged a bunch of old, poorly sourced and unsourced articles on small documentary films for notability, sourcing. And PRODDED 2. If you think I was wrong, just source them and then remove the tags. E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cute. When you are this wrong on the notability of the articles I listed, it is clear you did not perform any searches. All I asked was for you to consistently check for sources; attacking me and sighing over having to perform routine searches does not accomplish that.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 21:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles I. Ecker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carroll County Public Schools (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I would appreciate your input and help at the following talk pages. Thank you.

[3] [4] [5] [6]

David A (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harassment on this page

Hi, E.M.Gregory. You're getting quite a lot of IP attacks on this page. Would you like it semiprotected for a while? Bishonen | talk 18:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

User:Bishonen, Yes, please, and my sincere thanks.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done for a week, and you're welcome. Let me know if you need it topped up later. Bishonen | talk 18:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

See the talk page

The fact that they are signed does not mean they are not based on press releases. Many of the journalists working in modern newspapers are up against targets, and will place copy wholesale unedited that has been provided by PR agencies (see http://badpr.co.uk for some examples and discussion of the red flags). The byline means nothing unless you find that the writer is a serious news or feature journalist with an independent reputation. That is the sorry state of newspapers today. Ironically it's one area where Indian sources are somewhat better than Western (the reverse is true for scientific journals). Guy (Help!) 12:00, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flensburg

Do you have any references supporting the changes you've made? Deb (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See the next edit. You have to read the German sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did. Both the sources listed in the first paragraph support my wording. I've yet to see one that doesn't. Deb (talk) 18:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the article form Die Welt 4 June; the articles you cited are breaking news reports, often these are inaccurate.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If the reference is not correct, you should have removed it when you changed the wording and put the correct one in. Deb (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • You wrote, "Please check the timeline, I was not responding to your demand). I had checked the false information that you inserted , and was making a series of corrective edits, which included a validating source (3rd in string) completed before you pinged me - although you did move awfully fast. I then added 2 more sources and a couple of edits updating/correcting inaccurate information from early reports. There really is no point in making false accusations like this when edits are time stamped. "
  1. Anyone reading the above can see that I made no "demand".
  2. Anyone looking at the timeline can see that I added no "false information", but simply amended the wording to reflect what the cited references actually said.
  3. Fine, you were "making a series of corrective edits" because you hadn't noticed that your initial reversion meant you were making edits that conflicted with the references - how is this my fault?
  4. Anyone reading this can see that I made no "false accusations" or indeed any "accusations" of any kind.
Remember Wikipedia:Etiquette, assume good faith, and you'll be a much happier bunny. Deb (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello E.M.Gregory, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crimes related to the European migrant crisis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pincrete (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Filardi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Filardi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Filardi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EnPassant (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Iadarola

Per the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Iadarola (2nd nomination) as Iadarola's career has grown, I have added additional sources covering his primary hosting of "True North" and "The Damage Report" series with additional non TYT sources. This is in addition to his daily hosting duties on the TYT main show. I have reactivated the article to mainspace. Trackinfo (talk) 07:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Interstate 75 rock-throwing death for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interstate 75 rock-throwing death is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstate 75 rock-throwing death until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bneu2013 (talk) 07:18, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philadelphia History Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHYY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Ankit Love

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ankit Love. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. MB190417 (talk) 22:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello E.M.Gregory, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
  • New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
  • Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
  • Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
  • Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
  • The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLP DS notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:E.M.Gregory&oldid=853548994"