User talk:Materialscientist

• If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here.
• I turned off most notifications in my preferences, and therefore can't see pings, sorry.
• New messages go at the bottom.

Animoca edit

Hi, @Animoca: I have only changed the order and summarized to make it clearer to read. hope that makes sense? can you review and redo it? regards 2A02:2455:460:2400:F9C0:C283:EE20:F178 (talk) 17:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Georgi Manev

Dear Materialscientist, In December 2020 I addited smtg about Dr. G. Manev, but I do not remember what exactly by now. I assure you, it was not a prank or vandalism. No, I do not have references. Can you remind me?

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Georgi Manev, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

   If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sub-Section

Hi I'm not a professional with editing Wikipedia, however I noticed the reverted edits you made to Drayton Manor Theme Park. I'm not sure how to provide my source, though everything I added was either just additional content to inform people, and one was an update as a ride has recently been closed. Please could you tell me how to cite my sources so my edits can be restored?

Thank you hello, I just wanted to tell you that the Cleveland daily Banner, is actually a three day weekly newspaper. They couldn't afford to be daily anymore. Can please stop undoing the edit, and leave it up to people that live in Cleveland. Thanks.

Rubberducky3000 LTA

Hi. He is going crosswiki, and socks, like User:The Community's Newest Member. I have cleaned up at Commons. If it blockable more widely, can you please prod the stewards. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

External links

Hi Materialscientist,

I understand that you want to limit the external links in wikipedia.

But in the "CAD data exchange" page we can see several external links to commercial web sites in the "Third-party translators" section. So I still don't understand why you forbid a link to a non-commercial website developed to provide information to people. Of course, we could copy the content of this website into wikipedia, but it would be a waste of time.

And what about having this link in an "External links" section ?

Best Regards. JacquesHH (talk) 08:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

51.235.138.84

Hi. Thank you for blocking the disruptive IP. Would it be possible for you to have a look at the IP range (this IP is part of it) that I have reported to ANI? Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and possibly

Thank you for that revert on List of people killed for being transgender, could you also please revdel that as well? Thank you. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 21:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism

Can you please look into a continuous vandalism spree by Overcharts as I had to manually revert back to the sequence from "Coronavirus" in New South Wales Motorcycles as Overcharts has already been given two warnings not to vandalise Vehicle Registration plates of Australia wikipedia page. Overcharts need to be blocked permanently from these pages. Thank you.

Welldone65 (talk) 10:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:01, 4 January 2021 (edit) Overcharts (talk | contribs) (→‎Motorcycles: COVID-19) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit Revision as of 11:02, 4 January 2021 (edit) (undo) (thank) Overcharts (talk | contribs) (→‎Motorcycles: Coronavirus) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit → Line 322: Line 322:

| rowspan="2" | New South Wales

| rowspan="2" | New South Wales

| black/yellow

| black/yellow − | KEX·nn + | Coronavirus

| NSW

| NSW − | KEX·00</span + | Coronavirus</span

| Serials progress backwards from ZZZ·99.

| Serials progress backwards from ZZZ·99. Revision as of 11:02, 4 January 2021

Please allow edits to Makami College Inc and not edit additions Dirkmcgirk1 (talk) 20:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Editor not blocked, despite your notice

Hi Materialscientist
Yesterday you added a notice at Abdullahmumtazahsan stating "This account is a sockpuppet of Mumtazabdullahahsan1 .... and it has been blocked indefinitely."
However, as shown in their block log, you did not actually indef them, and now that the 31 hour block imposed by Bishonen earlier has expired, they have started editing again.
Could I please ask you to impose the indef block, as per your notice - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

//<setting><fonft><=9999999999999999999999999. Thunyakarn39 (talk) 08:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Ronnieradkerockgod

Not sure it matters, but isn't user:Ronnieradkerockgod the puppeteer, and user:Bcbryar643 the sock? I had opened an SPI on them earlier today. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Why don't you check the creation logs? Materialscientist (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi. My bad, I mistakenly looked at when the userpages were created, instead of correctly looking at the user contributions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Bcbryar63

They are actually a puppet and not a master. They are a suspected sockpuppet of Ronnieradkerockgod, as announced at AIV. Shinyedit (talk) 16:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

You can't know who is the master, but you can check their user creation logs; please try and learn how to find the oldest account. Materialscientist (talk) 16:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I will see. Shinyedit (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

I can verify your claim, I will alert SPI. Shinyedit (talk) 16:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello Materialscientist. The page on Inayat Khan is disorganized and contains inaccurate information. The changes I intend to make are all borne out by published sources, and I am fully prepared to provide additional citations as needed. Inayat Khan's paternal ancestors were Turkmen rather than, as the article incorrectly states, Pashtun. The article cites the dissertation "A Hybrid Sufi Order..." but there is no mention of Pashtun ancestry on the cited page or anywhere in the dissertation. On the contrary, as confirmed in the book "A Pearl in Wine: Essays, on the Life, Music, and Sufism of Hazrat Inayat Khan," edited by Pir Zia Inayat-Khan (New Lebanon, NY: Omega Publications, 2001), pp. 57-58, the paternal ancestors of Inayat Khan were "Turkestani" yuzkhans and bakshis. My correction of the titles attributable to Inayat Khan is likewise supported by this published account. There is no published (or indeed non-published) evidence for Pashtun ancestry. My edits are not vandalism and I wish to continue. Please kindly explain your objections or withdraw them. Thank you. Sincerely, Mirmughal

Reporting a school

Based on their behavior, it seems obvious that User:50.33.9.234 is a school, but nobody has tagged it. I don't think blocking them is necessary, because it appears that they have stopped. Was I right to tell you? Scorpions13256 (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Malpasset Dam—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

So I worked yesterday for 1:30 to bring Malpasset Dam into a format with unit conversions and an Infobox and improve Vajont Dam, and all you thought of was to post a vandalism warning on my talk page because you didn't like that I have included a length unit you don't like.

Ça va ben, ouais?

--2003:C8:4714:600:89B:8D28:5D3A:623F (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Edits from 180.210.185.82

Seems like some SEO job. They are trying to insert a link to their blog from a bunch of different articles related to scooters, and didn't even spare Scooter Braun! You have warned them before for spam so bringing to your attention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:180.210.185.82

Thanks --Molochmeditates (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Hawkesbury Radio

Hi Materialscientist, can you please take a look at the contributions of 120.17.142.157? They are repeatedly blanking on the page claiming that they are deleting misleading information. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 09:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 09:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Slightly puzzled...

Just found this message from you dated Nov last year (2020) - puzzled because although I made a few wikipedia edits probably nearly 10 years ago now I certainly haven't made any since then and certainly none on Johnny Hallyday's page!

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Johnny Hallyday—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Just to save Materialscientist who may not be online - you're editing from an IP address so contributions made are not necessarily unique to you. A look at the contributions from that address here shows that it has been used sporadically by somebody, including an edit on Johnny Hallyday here which is the reason for MS's response. There is the standard response here - if you create a userid you won't have to worry about this sort of thing happening, and second, if it wasn't you, don't worry about it. There don't seem to be any edits on this IP address from nearly 10 years ago, so I suspect you're on a dynamic IP address and it was different then - and may change again. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Edits to Multiplicity (psychology)

Hi User:Materialscientist

Apologies for not providing an edit summary, the reasons for the removal of contend on the above page are cited on the Article for Deletion discussion page - what I removed was basically unencyclopedic content with NPOV issues that was unrelated to what the article is supposed to be about. One of the (many) issues with that article is a drift in focus from a psychological concept to the minutiae of a certain subculture.

--Vitalis196 (talk) 15:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Unexplained deletions

I added a couple of sections to the talk page for caryophyllene. I worked hard on these talk sections. I don't know where they went or why. Nothing like this has ever happened to me before. And I've been making contributions to Wikipedia for 9+ years. My understanding of talk pages is that they're for talking and need not be as polished as the articles. These sections were important. They concerned

Medical uses of caryophyellene (per PubMed)
The hazards of pure 100% caryophyllene (per NOAA and PubChem)

If the deletions were accidental, I want them restored. And if deliberate, I would appreciate an explanation. In this case, I want access to the material that I wrote. For example, instead of just destroying stuff, moving it to my personal talk page would be nice, just sayin'.

Page Notes (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your tireless efforts in reverting vandalism everyday, it is very much appreciated. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 17:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Deleted Material

I received your message on my recent edits to the National Guard Bureau page. Specifically you reverted my changes and left the following note:

"Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to National Guard Bureau—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks."

The page currently lists multiple issues with the article version to which you reverted: "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: last section just dies, there is nothing bringing this article to the present even the lede mentions the major changes during the Global War on Terror, there is no reference in the article to the transition to a full position on the Joint Chiefs - the article essentially ends in 1998 (April 2014) This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2007)")

I would appreciating an explanation of why addressing the specific issues cited with the page (notably adding sections on the Global War on Terror, transitions to the full position on the Joint Chiefs, and including 26 additional citations) "do not appear constructive" and have my edits restored, as they represent nearly three weeks of intensive research and revision. HistoryEditor2021 (talk) 17:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Goodguy

It's nice to know you are one of the good guys. Eschoryii (talk) 02:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

URGENT - unsubstantiated and defamatory claims made in revised article

Hi, I noticed that you reverted a change made on a development project run by a charity I work with at present. Unfortunately, a former volunteer on the project who was unhappy with his dismissal (with two weeks notice as agreed in the volunteer contract) stemming from performance issues and an unwillingness to work as part of a team, decided to smear the name of the founder. None of the citations he provided are connected in any way to the accusations made. We have an entire team willing to vouch for the founder and the falseness of the claims. Please allow me to make the changes as it is utterly inappropriate for them to be made against a school with children and a thriving development project which we hope to expand. If you have any questions please contact me innagh@gmail.com

Sorry, I have no slightest idea what are you writing about, as your message gives very few hints to the actual Wikipedia article, editors and content. Materialscientist (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Noun & Pronoun

Hi, if you have time, can you check edits to articles (such as in the heading) by User:LPearceLearning. They seem to be spam. I have to work. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 15:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Extensive edit war

There seems to have been an extensive edit war between two people, starting as IPs and one then becoming User:Feno299, possibly with another temporary account used at one point. It turns on whether things are in Athens, Attica, or just Attica by the look of it.

I left a message for the IP and it seems to have stopped, but I have no idea who is "right". and haven't spoken to the registered user.

Can you take a look?

All the best: Rich Farmbrough 18:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC).

Reverted Edit

Hi @Materialscientist:, thank you for notifying me. I am still working on the draft. The disclosure has been added to the Talk page of the draft. I will add references, wikilinks, and structure the entire draft before submitting it for review. Hillster (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	When going to revert any unconstructive edit, I frequently find that the edit was already reverted by you. Keep up your outstanding work! Kajjul (talk) 11:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Thomas Orr disambiguation page

Hi, just noticed you said on my talk page to contact you on this, how on earth is what I did on the aforementioned page vandalism, even the article in question says he plays for Stranraer & has a reference to back it up! {82.44.252.223 (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC))

User:MirianaF1

Hi Materialscientist, User:Mirianaf1, who you blocked, is not a vandal. She's an Italian student involved in this project. May you unblock her? --Ferdi2005 (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Unblocked. Thank you for information about that project. Materialscientist (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You are a good man, Thank you :) -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 10:31 AM January 10, 2021 10:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

User talk:24.176.9.162 is Disruptive editing on January 2021

User talk:24.176.9.162 is Disruptive editing once again today January 10, 2021 on these Articles

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NXT_TakeOver_31&oldid=999586174 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hell_in_a_Cell_(2020)&oldid=999585710 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Survivor_Series_(2020)&oldid=999585178

Disruptive editing on June 2020, July 2020, October 2020, December 2020, and Today January 2021

Apparently this User talk:24.176.9.162 did not learn his lesson the last time you blocked this ip User talk:24.176.9.16,

I'll leave it up to you on how long to block him for and what ever you choose then i will be Ok with it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:24.176.9.162

Have An Great Day :)

--Chip3004 (talk) 01:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

LGBTQ+

Hi Materialscientist, MorganLoys here. I noted you reverted LGBTQ+ back to LGBT in this edit because you felt it did not appear constructive. The reason I updated is that LGBT is generally considered outdated and not inclusive of the whole community that this post about community-based marketing relates to. I feel that while it is a minor edit, it is constructive as it gives the page greater authority. MorganLoys (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

New message from DarkMatterMan4500

Hello, Materialscientist. You have new messages at DarkMatterMan4500's talk page.
Message added 14:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I was only reverting vandalism on other pages, and I am terribly sorry for that change on the William Joseph Burns page DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 14:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Material scientist, There is a little discussion on one of your recent edits on teni Junction Railway station. Already a Similar page with same name exist (see Madurai to bodi nayakkanur branch line template for reference), it's name is also teni junction railway station. So this page can be deleted in order to avoid confusion to the users and readers. But I don't know why do you reverted this edit done by me? If possible merge those two pages. I doesn't know how to merge two wikipedia pages.

You are allowing false history of my Fraternity.

I have edited the page on Prince Hall freemasonry to delete the FALSE info you are providing on your page, and update it with factual information. Why has it been reverted back? I Am a Member of the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge. Junior Deacon.

John Button

You keep removing my edit over his children saying I haven't cited a source. I am a friend of the family, apart from Samantha. How do I cite myself as a source? Buttonfan22 (talk) 11:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

You jumped on my edit immediately, but can't answer my question even though you asked me to message me?? Buttonfan22 (talk) 12:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:5G—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Tantrik massage

Kindly add correct source information to origin and history of Tantra. You may refer the source here. The practice comes from ancient India and the word Tantra, yoni and lingam are also very well comes from Sanskrit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tantra Micro369 (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Revdel consideration on Barren Grounds

Good morning/afternoon! Kindly take a look at [1]; I'm erring on the side of asking for revdel consideration (probably because I heard that Radiolab piece this weekend on NPR about the "right to be forgotten"); this is obvious stupidity, but there are obviously stupid people out there who won't get that. If you disagree, so be it! Thanks for all you do, and happy 2021! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Quick heads up.

User:HUMBOLDT ARCHIVIST/sandbox. Eagleash (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yevgeni Chernyshov (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yevgeni Chernyshov (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Re: January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Busy Philipps, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''

Material Scientist, your comment does not make sense. I made a copy-edit to the article. I did not introduce any new material. Can you explain what you did?

Thanks.

--MC

Erling Haaland

thanks for increasing protection level of Erling Haaland.Iamfarzan (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

79.185.101.84

79.185.101.84 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

I'm pretty sure this is GoneGetOneForm again - style fits, and they have a thing about ungulates. If you don't feel like blocking yet, I'll keep an eye out, they'll probably keep it up over the next few days... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Sriti Jha

Hi, Sriti Jha possibly needs a temporary protection as you've seen here. IPs are removing sourced content and sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Edits absolutely NOT inappropriate

This is an encyclopedia. It intended to provide accuraqte and complete knowledge of the subjects covered.

To do so, one must look at a topic from all perspectives, both those that cast a positive "politically correct" light on the subject, and those that convey an equally true yet not quite as flattering reality of the topic at hand.

There is no denying that the subject of the link in question is very much a part of "ladyboy culture". This may not be the progressive ideal one might aspire to achieve for this subculture, however as it stands, historically and in present, that is very much a reality of the ladyboy subculture.

To omit and censor out such facts and details would be to deprive the reader with a complete global perspective of the topic they are researching. Therefore, what is inappropriate is the overzealous censorship you took it upon yourself to thoughtlessly partake in this morning - clearly without taking a moment's time to consider what it is that you were doing, ad it took place seconds after it was posted.

What you are doing is against the spirit of free encyclopedic facual knowledge - you are censoring history and present day fact and writing your own version of facts (which are not facts, by the way).

I'm fairly certain thatis the exact OPPOSITE of the mission of Wikipedia

(talk page watcher) Ronnie Hokanson, we generally don't include links to external sites inline, which is likely why Materialscientist reverted your edit – this has nothing to do with censorship. If a site has value as a source, it should be cited inline – otherwise, they should usually be omitted (see the first link). Best, Blablubbs|talk 20:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Blablubbs Ordinarily I would be inclined to agreewith you and accept that as a likelihood, however the specific message I received specifically stated that they "feel the url submitted was inappropriate for an encyclopedia" - a verbatim quote that gives little merit to nuances in editing and absolutely screams personal opinion and censorship. Nice attempt at a save though

Ronnie Hokanson, you got me curious, so I clicked the link. It's literally a porn site. So no, it isn't appropriate for an encyclopaedia. Blablubbs|talk 20:41, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Again with the assumptions...

Not sure where you got this hairbrained idea, but I DO NOT OWN NOR AM I AFFILIATED WITH THE SITE THAT I LINKED TO - that was in no way shape or form a promotion that I would in any way benefit from - it is a link that sheds further light on a FACTUAL aspect of the life and culture of a ladyboy - whether you like it or not.. You really need to have your privileges removed, you are doing this page and anyone looking for accurate information on anything for that matter, a HUGE disservice

Edits to Steven Reiss's Wikipedia Page

As Steven Reiss's widow, I have inherited the rights to his intellectual property and preside over his company, IDS Publishing Corporation. The reference to Peter Boltersdorf was removed by me from my husband's page for legal reasons. As a former partner in Germany, Peter's licensing agreement was terminated for various reasons including failure to pay required fees under the licensing agreement, failure to use official translations of the items, and failure to stop associating the RMP with an inappropriate product per the terms of the licensing agreement. He is not to be associated with my husband's work or the Reiss Motivation Profile®. Please refrain from further edits on this section and contact me if you have any questions about this matter. Thank you.

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Hello, Materialscientist! You are receiving this barnstar because, according to this database query, you were the #1 most thanked Wikipedian of 2020, with 3358 entries in Special:Log/thanks! Thank you again for your contributions! Mz7 (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Judgement1

Hi, I wonder if you might be being a bit harsh on User:Judgement1. They are a newbie, and when making longer edits seem to have problems editing without trampling across existing formatting. They also need to understand the need to source their additional information. However, I think they are clearly editing in good faith, e.g. this edit, one you reverted, was an entirely correct emendation of a typo on my part. (Btw, congratulations on all those thanks! That is very cool!) Dsp13 (talk) 01:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Talk page warning

Hello Materialscientist, can you please explain what was that? Was it some software problem? --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes. Blame Huggle programming. Materialscientist (talk) 11:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Materialscientist, thank you, but why is it still showing me blocked on the new pages feed where I've created a new article an hour ago. Can you take a look? --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

About Elevation Capital

Hi, This is original wiki so please tell me what's the problem in this wiki. will do that

About Palayam, Thiruvananthapuram

I am trying to fix it's citation.

ElementSEO (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC) You reverted my changes to the Shopko page. My source is actually the Shopko wikipedia page itself. The first line says "all locations closed" but later on it says "Shopko Optical locations continue to operate". I'm going to edit the page back to say "all locations closed with the exception of the Shopko Optical locations which continue to operate" ElementSEO (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Socionics

Hello, I'm a new user and made a mistake, thanks for the reversion.

I have a question and would like to ask for you help in those matters. After your reversion I moved the information that was not factual but declarative, that is, a non-evidence based opinion, to the propper "Criticism" section, where specific views on the theory can be discussed. However User MrOllie reverted it back to the missinformative version without giving any reason, and pointed out my edit was "disruptive". Why is that unverified, disinformative version the offical one? If something is not factual, why should it be declared as such in an article?

Another sock

Since you have blocked two accounts of this user, here's a third that you might want to take a look at Bonfry, making exact same edits as Foridshunno and Mahyish hatt on Ekti Khuner Svapna. --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Don Omar vandal

is back (I'm pretty sure), though with an account this time. IP edit vs Cow. IP edit vs Cow. Here we see the trademark piped edit summary: IP vs Cow. Could I once again trouble you to take a look please Ms. Robvanvee 08:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Changes I made to 20 percent page

Hi. I see you reverted my changes due to the fact that I did not supply reliable resource of information. Can you please elaborate what exactly I should supply? I started running in Siemens the 20% program, and this is why I have this reliable information that it is running there:-)

Hello

Hello, I am Taha, a native of Ganjvan city in Chavar city, Ilam province and Iran. Thank you very much for returning my correct information. Dear friend, where are you, Hall, and what made you interested in Ganjvan, what materials do you know about? Taha-kurd77 (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Misunderstanding

Hello I think you’re confusing me with other vandalizers I was reverting a bad edit. this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000944392 I reverted it https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000944462

And then this you reverted and warned me on my talk page.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000944622

The same thing happened again I reverted the unsourced edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000946415 Here’s my edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000946594 You confused me with the unregistered user https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000946628 Oxforder (talk) 04:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Don Omar vandal continued

Hi again Ms. Only one edit so far but knowing this turd, there will be more to follow. The giveaway: the usual piped French edit summary and the unsourced addition of "100 million copies sold". Could I once again ask you to cast an eye please. Robvanvee 07:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

We now have this IP (after I reverted the edit by above sock) making the same edit. Robvanvee 07:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hadj Mohammed Mesfewi

You really are something else.

You write this:

wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hadj Mohammed Mesfewi—because it did not appear constructive.

I spend nearly an hour trying to improve the article using news reports from 1906 and you just revert me because they didn't appear to be "constructive". Did you bother to read the references yourself? Of course not. You're the one who is never constructive. Everything I wrote is referenced in those news reports.

I am fed up with this. Is it some kind of goal to put off any new contributors to his site? Every edit I make now, comes with the question is it worth it? Will it be an hour of my time wasted because it will get reverted by the likes of you?

Your unpleasantness deserves to be thoroughly investigated at an RF because your reversion edits go way beyond what is constructive or considered someone with a healthy mental attitude!81.141.59.72 (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Rollback

Per WP:ROLLBACKUSE, there was absolutely no reason to rollback on Gary Rowett, where I had in fact added SEVEN references, including one about his retirement. There is no need to cite things in the lead when it is cited later on. Did you actually read and evaluate the edit, or do you just revert everything by an IP, whether constructive or not? [2]

Question about user that kept adding the same links

Hi there, sorry to bother you. I was wondering if you could please help take a look at this when you have some time? Noticed that this user kept adding the same link that does not appear to be RS [1, 2, 3. It got reverted twice [1], [2]. But the same user still kept on adding the same link, with the most recent one being today. Not sure what's the best way to go about this, so I was hoping you could help check? Thank you in advance. --Citizensadvice11 (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Gifting my doge as an award

	Have some love!
	This user has a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Physics. Is that you sheldon? Nevertheless, I think i probably awarded you before, But i came across your contribs again and though you deserved some more love <3 -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 16:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

79.182.57.223

Can user:79.182.57.223 please be blocked ASAP for block evasion? CLCStudent (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

68.104.58.32

User talk:68.104.58.32 was given a temporary block last week, so I would think you can skip the escalating warnings this time.

Thanks for all your work, Dan Bloch (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

45.117.67.76

Can user:45.117.67.76 please be blocked asap for vandalism? CLCStudent (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

IP you blocked before back again

Nothing but vandalism ever from this IP address you previously blocked https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3A136.158.33.129 Five edits made total, all five reverted for being vandalism. Dream Focus 10:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

User_talk:76.71.252.113

I believe User_talk:76.71.252.113 is Disruptive editing by changing Attendance 0 (behind closed doors) to Attendance Virtual Audience via WWE Thunderdome[Note 1] to following Articles Survivor Series (2020), Hell in a Cell (2020), Clash of Champions (2020), Payback (2020), SummerSlam (2020). I already told him that he cannot do that and we only Count Live Attendance. He has been doing that since December. Chip3004 (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Haddonfield Parks and Recreation

Just to inform you I added citations to an article on parks and recreation. I hope they are sufficient. Also, I read the rules and it says it is not required to cite as long as they are not likely to be challenged which mine was not. All you had to do was they me it was insufficient.

Amazing Grace (2018 film)

Hello, Materialscientist. You have new messages at 207.161.86.162's talk page.
Message added 20:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

James Samuel Thomas

What of my editing today "did not appear constructive" to you? May I remind you that an author's name and a book title are quickly looked after by everyone if he/she so pleases? Also you could have done that. I do not understand your behavior. -- 79.194.234.172 (talk) 21:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Materialscientist appears to be just cranky and his/her reverting habits do not appear constructive. He/She does not respond to objections of his/her unreasoned reverts when addressed at his/her talk page (see above). Shame on you. -- 79.194.234.172 (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

You need to find better sources. Don't link to sites that are selling the book, because that is too promotional, and we have strict rules against promotion. Zaereth (talk) 23:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Zaereth, you need to shut up before you make false allegations. You should follow the rules before ranting that others did not. Which link I inserted was promotional? Do you just want to intervene without knowledge? Shame on you too. -- 79.194.232.127 (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Partyison

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Partyison. ManuelLopezz ^talk 23:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Template:Z48

Gleem

I don't understand why you removed my edit. The footnote link [1] gleem.com takes you to a rechargeable electric toothbrush marketed as Gleem by P&G, as I stated. Check ur talkAndrew T Coleman (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Frederik Paulsen Jr

Hello Materialscientist

You reverted the edit (my very first in fact) saying that it was unsourced. Apologies - I thought I'd give editing a go before creating an account and getting into it as a hobby. I am aware of Paulsen's polar exploration and simply felt that that was interesting enough to be in the introduction, which I thought was rather dull. The point I mentioned was supported by citations later in the article. But if this is not appropriate, so be it. I thought that I'd made it more interesting, even though I was not adding anything to the fact base. Anyway, editing seems far more complicated than I had realised so I may not get involved. Best Bob

Harry Potter characters

Hello Materialscientist

I didn't realise that my edits were disruptive to the article and I am sorry for any inconvenience I caused. I will try to be more careful in the future.

ScoobyTrips (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Notable people

Seems to be an attack of "notable people". Must be a post someplace telling people to do it. I'm exhausted. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

• Magnolia677, I saw this myself and was going to thank Materialscientist for some of the battling. I reported this at ANI as this seems to be more than a couple of mischievous kids at work. Thanks to both of you, but this is a real problem. Alansohn (talk) 20:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping an eye out for a rush of garbage today. I don't know how widespread it is, but your efforts are appreciated in the articles I watch out for. Cheers, PKT(alk) 21:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

E

You told me that I tried to vandalize the Columb's Law page. It wasn't my intention. I was trying to figure out why the minus sign isn't showing on the page. The "edits" I made are tests. Thank you for sharing the sandbox feature.

N!cK GER

user:N!cK GER is abusing his talkpage. CLCStudent (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Talk page access revoked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@CLCStudent: I requested a global lock against him on the Stewards' noticeboard, and just like that, the account is as good as gone. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The Borderlands film

You reverted my addition describing the characters of the film as "members of a Catholic investigative team called 'The Congregation'" and have accused me of 'disruptive editing'. Please explain why. The change is based clearly on information provided in the film, and serves to amplify the background of the characters and the premise of the movie. I have been editing on Wikipedia for 10+ years. Thank you.

(talk page stalker) If I may, your additions are not "essential" - that they are members of a Catholic team is already evident when its said later in the sentence that they are sent by the Vatican. In any case, plot summaries should always seek to be rather short and not too verbose - shorter is better because it allows painting a broader and more informative picture without getting stuck in little details such as what the team is called. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

I take your point about plot summaries being concise, however, I don't agree that my addition amounted to 'disruptive editing', which would involve providing false or misleading information. I did not do that. However, I will refrain from editing this page any further.

Question

Did you create a Miraheze account by any chance? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:NOTGUIDE

Hello Materialscientist, Hope you're doing well. I can see your message on FreakBrainAtWork's talkpage which is filled with previous warnings. I wish to draw your attention to that the editor is back and editing Petzone article. Geekperson (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The Very Things

Thank you for your message about reverting changes I made to The Very Things page. However, there are many inaccuracies and some misspellings on the page. I am Robin Dallaway, founder member of The Very Things (and The Cravats) and would like the page to be accurate about our history, especially since I am now working under The Very Things name once again, having just recorded a new album. I am a newcomer to Wikipedia, so forgive me any inappropriate action, but as a primary source (myself) do I need citation for my additions? If you believe I do, I'd be grateful for any advice as to how to proceed. I would like to add substantially to the page and bring it up to date. RR Dallaway (talk) 13:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@RR Dallaway: As a primary source you should abstain from writing on yourself or matters closely associated with you (see WP:COI). In any case, the fact is that, on the internet, anybody could claim to be anybody (you will surely understand that it is not possible to simply take your word for it - if you are indeed who you claim to be and you would like to further edit the Conflict-of-interest article then you should probably file a ticket with WP:OTRS). To avoid this issue, and also since personal anecdotes can be inaccurate, it is best if the information you add can be sourced to a reliable, (ideally independent from the band), already published source (such as coverage in news reporting outlets). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

NATO® USPTO Registered Trademark

WP:COI Nonsense

TO Whom it may concern, Regarding Link Below https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_watch_strap We acknowledge your reply, however our understanding of wikipedia protocol regarding editing of violation of any trademark or copyrights can be addressed and corrected by editing by the lawful rights owner. NATO® is a registered Trademark of International Watchman Inc. governing class 014 Reg. No. 3907646 watches, Watchbands and watchstraps. This article is an error and an infringement on our USPTO governing rights with respect this page should be ammended as such. Also the references used are only bloggers opinions with misleading information. Advise Accordingly. International Watchman Inc. NATO® — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiMan1215 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks -Roxy the happy dog . wooF 19:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

What's this about?!? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

A COI editor attempting to ignore Wikipedia policy and guidelines to enforce a spurious trademark claim on a common design originating in the public sector of a NATO member military, from which the common name derives. Any attempts to use Wikipedia to enforce such a claim are clearly grounds for permanently blocking the editor per WP:NOTHERE oknazevad (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC) PS, WP:NLT is also relevant. oknazevad (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NATO watch strap, but I agree, WP:NOTHERE -Roxy the happy dog . wooF 22:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Looking up in online databases, International Watchman, Inc. barely exists. It has an ancient website that doesn't work anymore built for the year 2006. Additionally a different company has the trademark for "NATO STRAP". This is in addition to the fact that there's a lot of NATOs out there ranging from the National Association of Theater Owners, National Association of Tobacco Outlets, and mostly notably the North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries. Regardless, even things which are copyrighted trademarks (like company names and products) we're still allowed to talk about them. Just mentioning "<Whatever Product>™" isn't a copyright violation. It's more likely to be an advert than that. Anyway hatting, xsigning, and disregarding further. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 22:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi💬, International Watchman IS THE ONLY lawful rights owner of the Reg. Trademark NATO® governed under the USPTO class 014 Watches, Watchbands and Watchstraps. You mentioned "Additionally a different company has the trademark for "NATO STRAP"." Who are you referring to? The article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_watch_strap was written with misleading information and with non-credited sources only to establish personal commerce. Our intentions here are to amend and inform readers with correct information.

Miraheze

Hello, are you Materialscientist on Miraheze? Thank you! :) --MrJaroslavik (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

No, that is an impostor. I use this username only on Wikimedia websites. Materialscientist (talk) 09:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! I've locked him there.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for clearing this all up Materialscientist. It looks that other Materialscientist has attempted to deceive us Miraheze users. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Emperor of China

Hello. I saw you reverted an edit in the Emperor of China article as vandalism, and wanted to know if you know someone who could verify that the emperor referred to himself or herself as Zhèn (朕), the original Chinese first-person singular arrogated by the First Emperor, functioning as an equivalent to the "Royal We", or Guǎrén (寡人, the "Morally-Deficient One") in front of his or her subjects. I happened to see that and it seems like someone wrote that as a joke that so far had gone unnoticed.--179.6.192.157 (talk) 08:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

How to block "notable people" vandals?

Hi, I saw that you blocked an IP that had taken part in the current "notable people" silliness. Thanks! I've been reverting lots of this stuff. I'd like to get some of these accounts / IPs blocked, but I don't want to spend several minutes on each one going through ANI etc. Is there a better way to report them? — Chrisahn (talk) 20:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Missed a bit

I know this was a Huggle undo but doing without realizing that "local legend" and "poon slayer" also didn't belong somewhat obscured the real problematic edits. Just something to watch out for, it's been awhile since I've used Huggle so I don't even remember if you can see that. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 23:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Cape Town

Just so you know, there is an IP hopper on Cape Town. CLCStudent (talk) 16:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Article in need of protection

Hi, since I see you've also reverted vandalism at Varun Dhawan - mind using the mop the prevent any further disruption by IPs in the short term? I asked yesterday at RFPP, got denied, and now the problem is only getting worse... Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Adding context to Washington, Louisiana entry

Hi Materialscientist: You reverted my recent edit to Washington, Louisiana and I think it was appropriate. What was previously there:

In The Civil War in Louisiana, historian John D. Winters described the city as "squalid and dirty...[with] filth, ugly buildings, and its large number of black inhabitants."

This is a clearly racist statement, attributing the town's squalidness and dirtiness to its black residents, and it is presented without any context. The context is that John D. Winters was, in fact, very racist — even among his (generally quite racist) fellow Dunning school Southern historians of the early to mid 20th century. See his own entry:

Winters' work has been criticized for reflecting white racial bias toward slaves of historians of the early 20th century, particularly followers of the Dunning School. In a review of historiography of the war and historians' treatment of blacks in the South, Clarence L. Mohr of the University of Georgia wrote in 1974 of The Civil War in Louisiana that Winters treated blacks "in a more insensitive manner than many earlier studies"... Winters' discussions, however, are characterized by frequent mentions of the "Negro problem," allusions to sexual indiscretions by 'colored wenches' and attempts by Union soldiers to "lure" slaves away from their masters...The author's perspective is further revealed in his description of black conduct in areas occupied and later evacuated by Federal troops during General Nathaniel P. Banks' Red River expedition in 1863. "Some [Negroes]" writes Winters, "refused to work and were shot; some were soundly thrashed; and all of them began to act better."

If we're going to quote him attributing Washington's squalor to its "large number of black inhabitants," it is thoroughly appropriate to note his bias in the matter. Otherwise, the quote does more harm than good. 2601:19C:4680:EFB0:7C42:E3BC:F31D:31AA (talk) 02:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

John F. MacArthur

This IP user (24.184.74.236) keeps adding unsourced content to the page and keeps reverting when removed. Can this IP be blocked? Blissfield101 (talk) 03:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	thank u sexy Giadagood (talk) 14:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

IP address removal

Hi,

I accidently logged out and forgot to log back in, and made an edit. My IP address is shown on the edit log, and I was wondering if you could take it off?

Alpha aquarii (talk) 16:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Alpha aquarii (talk) 15:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Alpha aquarii: - See WP:Oversight. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Charles Spearman

Hello This is my reply to your message about reverting the removal of the photo. I didn't realise that I should include a note with the change, which I have done with the latest change. The photo is not of Charles Spearman and details and reference are in the Talk page.

Talk page warning2

Assuming this was an error in Huggle? --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 14:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes. Huggle messes up when more than one editor tries to revert/block a vandal. Materialscientist (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Axis powers

Hi, I noticed you blocked this disruptive account. Thank you! Could we get the page semi-protected though? There's all kinds of IPs and socks there now. Volunteer Marek 15:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

BTW, based on the similarity of the name construction plus the nature of the edits I'm guessing it's the same person as this indef banned account [3] (which was trying to impersonate a real life person) Volunteer Marek 16:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for protection at Axis Powers. Could you take care of this [4] as well (talk page) - GizzyCatBella🍁 17:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. These comments [5] should become hidden, correct? So my reverts of that, I think [6], [7] ? - GizzyCatBella🍁 17:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Houston, Illinois

User:TicTawCentral/sandbox/List of Barraclough Series Episodes[8] and Skinwater Ranch [9] - Do we have two accounts and an IP? Two accounts and H,I logged out? One editor? Something's very odd. Doug Weller talk 19:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Thank you for blocking and preventing vandalism! PirelliSlicks (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

User talk:209.183.136.7

Hi Materialscientist, would you object to an unbock of 209.183.136.7? PhilKnight (talk) 20:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Done, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocking IP for vandalism?

Hey, I generally appreciate your efforts to keep the encyclopedia vandalism-free. However, I feel like your block of 2001:569:793B:B100:BD02:58E5:2EA8:A712 might've been a bit hasty. From the content they added to the article, it seemed like they were trying to be helpful - while they didn't provide a source, I have heard that Blackberry was another stock being affected. Consider unblocking? Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 20:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Kirpi MRAP

Hi, I'm Ata Baris, the section I deleted was about the Kirpi armored vehicle, and it says that it is a replica of an Israeli vehicle. But the site is not official and there are no photos. The two vehicles are very different from each other. I did not write as this is a minor change.Ata Barış (talk) 20:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Anita Devi

Hello, I didnt remove content, I removed a tag asking for sources from January 2016; sources were provided after that and no one uptdated. I think you made a mistake reverting me. Thank you. 2804:14D:5CE1:9862:7D81:F3C2:3F21:98F8 (talk) 20:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

I simply tried to correct a name that had been wrong for years.

    Materialscientist, you have reverted my tiresome 1 h and 26 min work that I stayed up late to fix, may I ask why? Kinopio-kun is the proper name for Toad, a character of the Mario franchise. I made sure to check my spelling for each of them, and also corrected Toadette into Kinopio-chan. Mario was made in Japan, and I believe that people should stop using a false name given to him. My edit was only for educational purposes only, which you had reversed. I later found out that one of the file names had been meddled with (completely by accident, by the way) and I fixed it immediately. My 31 hour ban has been lifted, yet I still can't edit the specific page. Is this of your doing? From all of the information given to me, my fixes is not any acts of vandalism. Perhaps you can tell me what to do about this?

    168.245.213.159 (talk) 00:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Please revoke TPA

Hello Materialscientist, you had blocked Chiamatafx indef. They are currently abusing their talk page. Can you please remove the talk page access. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 10:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

why

i don't have an account, and probably won't make an account, but my ip keeps getting flagged for things i've never done:/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.218.119.141 (talk • contribs)

Don Omar vandal, possibly

Hi Materialscientist.

I'm back with the same problem but if you would prefer I to take this to SPI, please tell me as I don't want to bog you down with trivial BS. I'm pretty sure the next reiteration of said problematic user is back, this time with a new registered identity, Drells and is making the usual edits to Don Omar related articles, editing sales of albums etc. They are attempting to source some edits but these are to either unreliable websites or the source just 404's. Also, gauging from edit summaries, this person, like all before them (as well as this new account), are probably French Spanish speaking. Could I once again ask you to take a look or would you prefer this taken to SPI? Robvanvee 08:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

On the other hand, after months of persistent vandalism, perhaps I'm just being paranoid. As such, I'd value your input. Robvanvee 08:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Request Resolved

Changes no longer needed. I do not know how to delete this (I am new to Wikipedia) so please remove it yourself if you can. Thank you. Chaos Gentleman (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Chaos Gentleman: Please be aware of conflict of interest and policies about concerted efforts by outside groups. I've given you some relevant links on your talk page. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

IP vandalism

Materialscientist, the IP currently known as 2a02:c7f:1423:f000:f8b5:3e5b:2af7:eb0d vandalized 15 articles over a period of about two and a half hours, starting at 18:40 yesterday. While I was cleaning them up, I realized that one of the articles, Let's Sing and Dance, had been vandalized over a period of a few months by various IPs, and one of them was the similarly named 2a02:c7f:14f5:7f00:a126:6ccf:4b30:a5f8 two months earlier; those edits were still current. Both addresses frequently use the fake edit summary "Added links".

What I'm hoping is that you can block whoever it is for a significant period to prevent this kind of damage—they're clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. Thanks for anything you can do. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit war

Please have a look at ATK Mohun Bagan FC. Two users are involved in edir war even though they have been warned several times. They were already askd to start a discussion on talk page regarding the dispute which thy ar not following. Please take necessary action Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 09:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)