User talk:Paradise Chronicle

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	For your by-the-book adherence of WP:3RR and attempting to discuss on the talk page when disagreeing with another editor about which word to use in the lead on Tunceli Province Hillelfrei talk 13:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Have a cupcake! I have noticed that when other Wikipedians questions your edits, you have kept quite civil, even if they didn't. Also, thank you for reverting vandalism! Wikiffeine •‿• 00:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Well done for your contributions recently, I have found this a struggle and you have been coping marvellously for longer than I have. GPinkerton (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Thank you for defending and contributing to Kurdish-related topics! Épine (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Anniversary

	Vicennalia
	Thanks for all your work for the encyclopaedia; it's twenty years old today! GPinkerton (talk) 19:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Self-reverting

Please self-revert fully if you are to avoid sanctions. Thanks. El_C 17:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, only because there is doubt. I self-revert for no reason and take it to the arb-com.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Paradise Chronicle, please do not continue editing while this remains outstanding. A response to this should be your utmost priority. El_C 22:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

That is not how an Arbitration case is meant to be drafted (even all the formatting errors aside) — you need a summary of the dispute. But Arbitration is the last stage of the dispute resolution process. I get the sense that you haven't exhausted other dispute resolution avenues yet. El_C 22:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed your reply above because it was unindented. Now, what about this latest edit whose edit summary reads "revert"? How do I explain that? El_C 23:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

I usually resort to you only if there is really help needed, but now you revert my request at the arb-com for formatting. Ok it is a difficult thing apparently. You wrote there are other resources. What are they? Ibn Amr edit wars like a pro and all the wikipedia admins are defending his behavior so far. He literally wrote I don't care as an answer after as he was demanded explanations to explain his edits. He was demanded an answer to this 2 times more before iBN Amr answered with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tell_Abyad&diff=next&oldid=963052636&diffmode=source this which was also not on topic. He is the major edit warrior in the dispute 11 times. And you tell me to self revert? What do you want? I don't get it. Where is the solution, who can help? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Paradise Chronicle, see WP:DRR for more options. Please respond to my query about your last "revert" — I need an explanation about that. Thanks. El_C 23:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

I tried to self revert, I really did. I restored now just an older version in which all the quotes are included. I hope this works for you. Thanks for the noticeParadise Chronicle (talk) 23:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

It does not. Please self-revert that as well while you still can. Failing to do so risk sanctions. El_C 23:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Never mind, you are reverting further still? I am sanctioning you. El_C 23:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

i have been restoring to the version just as it was before my first edit today. This version is now at wikipedia. I don't get it, why you are blocking me.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

The version you should have reverted to was this one. El_C 23:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Well, Ibn Amr wrote at the talk page he wanted me to self revert the whole thing at the 8 July. He also mentioned this at the 3RR noticeboard. On the 8 July the current version was the one he wanted. I guess this is a misunderstanding. Anyway, in both versions, in the one El C wanted and the one in place now, all quotes in dispute are included.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

It doesn't really matters what Amr ibn Kulthoum wants — you were obliged to self-revert to the latest version before your reverts. El_C 00:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

This was it. This was what he wanted, a full revert of all the edits I made. That's why he came to you to the talk page. By the way, I have reverted to your wanted version – before, but then you told me to further revert, which then I did. This is just not fair, sorry. There was a confusion, as I told that both versions of you and of me include all three quotes in dispute, I thought you want me to restore all three quotes. But only my version includes all three quotes in dispute, your version only includes one, the one of KurdWatch, mine the one of KurdWatch, WaPo and Balanche.I reverted to both versions, both times trying to do the correct thing and get blocked.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Paradise Chronicle, thanks. I can appreciate your efforts to make it right. I have unblocked you (see below) as a result. El_C 01:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Partial block from Tell Abyad

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of one week for violating the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 23:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Unblocked

Okay, Paradise Chronicle, I can appreciate that there may have been a misunderstanding. I have therefore unblocked you. Happy editing! El_C 01:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aziz Feyzi Pirinççizâde has been accepted

Aziz Feyzi Pirinççizâde, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Murder of Şule Çet

Hello, Paradise Chronicle,

Thank you for creating Murder of Şule Çet.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Surely with the social media campaign this had more news coverage for notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Otr500}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Otr500 (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Pings

I see you tried to ping me and others recently, but I didn't receive the ping and neither will anyone else because you need to add signature in the same edit for the ping to be sent. Thanks for everything! GPinkerton (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021: Arbitration

I have filed an arbitration case request. I have listed you as a party. See: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Syrian_Kurdistan. GPinkerton (talk) 07:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Re your broader draft case request: I would just explain the situation to the arbs (that you were working on a case request of your own, you can link to your subpage so they can see it) and ask them if they want you to file it or not file it. They might want to combine the two requests into one request. I notice at least some of them are talking about a broader case, so maybe they'd deny Gpink's narrower case request and accept your broader request. Or, they might decline Gpink's and not want you to file a duplicate. Who knows; really only the arbs know. Levivich ^harass/_hound 17:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the update, Levivich.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Paradise Chronicle

Thank you for creating Çağlar Demirel.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 02:48, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Kurds and Kurdistan case opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 5, 2021, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

RfA

Hey, PC, I'm so sorry if I asked that question in a way that seemed harsh! I didn't intend that, only to try to attain clarity! —valereee (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry, you were sort of right. My intention was good, too, but at the stage of RfA's one shouldn't wobble around with the phrasing of questions. There will be RfAs again, and similar questions will come up until the issue is solved. I actually try to formulate the questions in a general fashion, as last time (at Hog Farm) my question was maybe a bit too detailed and met with some slight criticism from a very respected editor.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I see! You asked a very specific question at Hog Farm's and someone said it was too specific, and then you made it less specific for TJMS, and I came along and said it wasn't specific enough! :D I'm sorry about that!

Maybe if we turn this around, I can help you define your question for the next RfA: Can you think of an answer that would make you think, "Yes, that's what I was hoping to hear, I will support this candidate?" Or conversely, one that would make you think the opposite -- that you would oppose the candidate?

(The reason I ask is that unless you need to know the answer to this question before you can decide whether to support or oppose, it's probably not a question for RfA but instead should be discussed at some policy talk page.) —valereee (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted at the open Kurds and Kurdistan case

In the open Kurds and Kurdistan arbitration case, a number of remedies and finding of facts have been proposed, some of which relate to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed

An arbitration case regarding Kurds and Kurdistan has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Thepharoah17 (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• عمرو بن كلثوم (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Supreme Deliciousness (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Shadow4dark (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Shadow4dark is an editor who opposed a topic ban on ThePharoah17 after I demanded one within the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan for this edit and which was made in the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan and where they for the record stated Kurdistan is a secular idea. It doesn't exist because it has no reason to exist. and in the same edit That's why there isn't really such thing as a Kurdish name. I thought it might be good to have it mentioned that they were a participant in the discussions of the case.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 00:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

For transparency here is the discussion we had at the ANI.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gara massacre, you may be blocked from editing.

ANI notification

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. I've opened a report on administrators' noticeboard regarding you. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 13:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

This report led to the deletion of the article in question ("Gara Massacre").Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Ömer Faruk Gergerlioğlu

Hello Paradise Chronicle, in this edit you added probably that his legal immunity was removed. Yesterday, his parliamentary membership was removed, not his legal immunity. see The 16. Criminal Court of the Court of Cassation (Turkey) has approved the imprisonment, then Presidency of Turkey, sent a proposal for the abolition of the status of this MP on Turkish parliament. And yesterday when the vice president of the parliament read the relevant proposal of the Presidency of Turkey, his MP right was removed. I suggest if you can edit at this point? Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 09:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Istanbul Convention

Hello again Paradise Chronicle. Thank you for your editing. President of Turkey took this decision on March 20, but Turkey have reported the General Secretariat on 22 March for this decision of withdrawal. full-list of signatures In order to withdraw from the contract, this decision must be reported to the Council of Europe. For example, ratification date for Turkey is 14 March 2012, but Turkish parliament has taken this ratification on 24 November 2011. ratification of Turkish parliament Also on 10 February 2012, the Turkish government decided to transmit this decision of the parliament to the president, and this approval of the parliament was accepted by the president and was published in the official gazette on 8 March 2012 [1]. Probably Turkey has reported to the Council this ratification on 14 March 2012. Dates accepted by the Council are entered to this template. I wonder if you can edit withdrawal date that way? Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I can try to do so. I expanded on the ratification of the treaty at Women in Turkey. I also adapted my edits at the Istanbul Convention and I removed the withdrawal column for now as the process of withdrawal is still ongoing until the 1 July 2021. It can re-added at that date or a bit earlier with expected in parenthesis. Thank you for the trust. To have a Global Sysop with less than 400 edits in the English Wikipedia on my Talk Page twice within a few days is not something I was expecting.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

No problem. I wanted to make a small edit for the withdrawal, but it was better to inform you. I specify my views on issues related to Turkey, I had nothing to do with global sysop rights. :) In the meantime, related legal cases have begun to be filed for the cancel of the decision on the grounds that it is against the law. After that, probably no much will change, but everytime nothing is clear for Turkey. Also, thank you for make your edits according my comments and the resources. Uncitoyen (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Must see once

Hello @Paradise Chronicle:, I want to make Emiway Bantai. I tried once before to create an article Emiway Bantai (Indian rapper), but it was deleted, which probably would not have passed GNG at that time. Then I found a Machayenge article from Emiway on Wiki. When I checked that article, it turned out that it was created by CptViraj. He is also an NPR. When I talked to him about this, he said that he was previously associated with this subject. So now he does not want to make it. Then I saw their sandbox which was made to make User:CptViraj/sandbox/Emiway Bantai. Recently I have prepared an article on their sandbox. Therefore, I will ask you to review it. Since its main title is Protected by the Administrator, I will ask you to move it to Emiway. Must see once. Thank you 2402:3A80:10CA:7818:C024:C6CC:B8CC:5E1E (talk) 10:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

@Paradise Chronicle:, I am waiting for your reply. 2402:3A80:10C5:7807:E52F:490A:CE8F:4B74 (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. I have made a short overview of the article in question, but I am not as experienced enough yet, to move it to draft space. Then also I am not experienced enough in the Indian rapper scene and I'd prefer someone with more knowledge on the topic has a look at it as well. The article seems to have enough sources though. Maybe you could ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE for some help, I received a lot of help there as well. And create an account? I hope this was an encouraging advice. Happy editing.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ched (talk) 04:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

• I'd ask that any admin responding to an unblock request review this AE thread I didn't specifically make it an WP:AE block, so any admin is free to unblock if they feel it's the right thing to do. — Ched (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  Ched, Where did you see any support for one month block for the filer? Shrike (talk) 09:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  @Ched: I started looking at WP:AE due to a backlog report. I can see that Paradise Chronicle was criticized for various inappropriate behavior, but it seemed minor and not warranting a block. My reading of AE is that the admins commenting where saying the reported user needed a one-month block, not Paradise Chronicle. I see your above disclaimer that I can unblock if wanted, but I'll wait a while to see if you are available to let me know if there is something I'm missing. Johnuniq (talk) 09:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  (edit conflict) I had a lengthy reply but didn't "copy" before hitting enter. So ... Johnuniq, that's fine. I have no problem with the unblock, personally I would have gone with maybe a week, but based the length mentioned on the AE report, which hadn't been edited for several days, - so I took a shot at closing. There's no special info I have or any preference one way or the other. — Ched (talk) 10:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  OK, thanks I unblocked. Johnuniq (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Paradise Chronicle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

MY user page gets edited in bad faith within a topic ban violation, I report it and then I get blocked for 1 month? In the report it was clear that ThePharoah17 incurred in a topic ban violation also in an other talk page removing a DS alert. Sysop Bishonen also noticed this during the discussion. This must be a mistake. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Block not needed per discussion with blocking admin above and WP:AE comments. Johnuniq (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Precious

peace referendum

Thank you for quality articles about Kurdish topics such as Süreyya Bedir Khan and Academics for Peace, and Swiss culture, including 1967 Basel Picasso paintings purchase referendum, for "don't worry, you were sort of right", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2596 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Dealing with time-wasting editors

I appreciate the patience you show when dealing with the IP on Talk:Armenian genocide. However, time is the most precious commodity of good-faith editors. When I can, I try not to waste it on those who aren't WP:HERE to build an encyclopedia. Apologies if this unsolicited advice is unwanted, and thanks for everything you do here. (t · c) buidhe 10:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

The advice is very welcome and I intend to adhere to it.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Sunshine

		Sunshine!
		Hello Paradise Chronicle! Mccapra (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 21:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

AANES disruption

Hi Paradise Chronicle. Regarding the disruption at AANES, if you don't get a robust enough response to your report at AN/3RR, or it gets archived without action, maybe it's better to file a report at AN/I or AE? They seem like more appropriate forums given the general battleground behaviour and whiff of meatpuppetry. I apologise for not filing something myself, but I'm really stretched for time at the moment. Jr8825 • Talk 00:11, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. It's ok. They are blocked for a while now. Next time (if there will be one) it will be longer. I'll look into the AN/I, AE possibility, but as for this one, I thought it would be a bit harsh for a new Editor.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK holding area

Thank you for reviewing Flag of Sark. Can I ask if you could on WP:DYKNA move the nomination template down to the 6th of August holding area please? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

It is currently held at 6th of August. Cwmhiraeth moved it down before I could do anything. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 2021 Konya massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Konya massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Konya massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GenQuest ^"scribble" 11:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Philip G. Kreyenbroek

On 8 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Philip G. Kreyenbroek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Philip Kreyenbroek taught Iranian studies at the University of Göttingen due to his interest in Yazidi traditions and the fact that about half of the Yazidi diaspora lived in Germany at the time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philip G. Kreyenbroek. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Philip G. Kreyenbroek), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the scientist! He is also featured on Portal:Germany! Yesterday I had two interesting DYK (I think), and the day before was at a concert with Daniel Barenboim just playing piano, and afterwards he and the orchestra received last year's prize (pictured). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Those were interesting cultural DYKs. Inspiring. And good to know the Portal Germany has a DYK as well. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

The German DYK is fed by the other, taking everything on board that is remotely related, - keep watched if interested. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Atatürk's nationalism

Hi Paradise Chronicle. A recently-created article Atatürk's nationalism looks like an unnecessary pro-Turkish nationalist POV fork of Kemalism and Turkish nationalism to me, but I'm no expert on this area. Would you mind taking a quick look and offering a second opinion? Thanks. – Joe (talk) 06:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Joe, I was looking at it and the Nationalism section at Kemalism as to me is more on topic of Atatürks nationalism than the article Atatürk's Nationalism. I suggest to expand the Nationalism section in Kemalism much more before creating a new article on the subject. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Racism-Turanism trials at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Racism-Turanism trials

On 28 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Racism-Turanism trials, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the defendants in the Racism-Turanism trials between 1944 and 1947 were absolved because racism wasn't contrary to the Turkish constitution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Racism-Turanism trials. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Racism-Turanism trials), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)}  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  08:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213 Online events: New: Film + Stage | Endocrine health Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Benedetta Argentieri

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benedetta Argentieri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

November songs

... for the teamwork barnstar, much appreciated! Today 3 DYK, Brahms depicted + sadly Aga Mikolaj (listen!). May the roads that we travel make us meet again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

you likely undid my edit..please explain the logic.

hi, im just hoping you can explain why my edit was wrong and how the lineage currently in print makes any logical sense. i could totally be wrong here, and if i am i do hope to learn, but it seriously is really hard to wrap my mind around the way it stands. thanks.

ok I edited the page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrhidaeus

because i arrived there by starting at alexander the greats page, clicking on the link for his father phillip II, then from phillip II page i clicked on his father amyntas III, then from amyntas III page i clicked his father arrhidaeus....hopefully we can both agree that 3 fathers deep from a person would equate to their great grandfather...that being said, arrhideaus would be alexanders great grandfather.... however, the page for arrhidaeus has him listed as one of alexanders generals, it also states he was selected to return alexanders body when alexander died in 323BC...using the years listed throughout the lineage, in 323BC arrhidaeus would have been well over 100 years of age.

now i find a few things highly unlikely 1.)that alexander would have his grandfather as a general, not to mention his GREAT grandfather.. 2.)that arrhideaus was even still alive in 323BC (a 100+ year life span was prettymuch unheard of during those times) 3.)that even if this 100+ year old general and great grandfather of the king WAS in fact in the kings army, he would be one of the LAST people selected to shoulder the burden of bringing the deceased kings body back home.

Could you PLEASE explain to me why the history that is listed is correct.. if its not correct and it was my poor editing and poor wikietiquette, could you please let me know the correct way that it needs to be done.

but yeah, its just so completely far fetched it makes no sense at all..almost like there should be 2 people named arrhidaeus and the one thats currently linked would be his general and then a separate page linking to his great gandfather...can you please explain the logic or let me know somehow whats really going on there..if you check the talk page for arrhidaeus, im not the first person to notice things literally dont add up.

sorry to be a bother, i just feel like if it can be fixed, it probably should be fixed. thanks for your time either way it goes.

i appreciate any info you can share. Snarevox (talk) 06:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

link to alexanders page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great

link to phillip II page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_II_of_Macedon

link to amyntas III page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amyntas_III_of_Macedon

link to arrhideaus page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrhidaeus Snarevox (talk) 06:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Snarevox, after you edited the Arrhidaeus article you left a large amount of text above and within the article pointing out there was a mistake. I first tried to understand and to fix it, but I was a bit slow and had low internet access these days. Today I took off the wikilink to Arrhidaeus at Amyntas III of Macedon. I hope your concern is addressed for now. If you feel there is a mistake again, do not hesitate to leave me a message. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

thank you!!!! i really do appreciate the fix. it made no sense and i know i left a buncha junk where it didnt belong but there were just too many little tidbits relating back to alexander for me to fix it without affecting more links that i had no business messing with. i never thought about simply removing the link from the previous page to essentially make it two separate arrhideaus'(s?). what you did was so simple yet simultaneously brilliant it actually kinda blows my mind. thanks again. im not super into punctuation as i hate cellphone keyboards. have a great day, and may you be blessed with free unlimited broadband for the resta your days!!! Snarevox (talk) 20:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Cédric Wermuth

On 23 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cédric Wermuth, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Cédric Wermuth, the co-president of the Swiss Social Democrats, was once fined for squatting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cédric Wermuth. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cédric Wermuth), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Edit Request: Help needed for Chobani

Hello. I am Kait and I work for Chobani. I recently posted an edit request on the Talk:Chobani page, which has so far gone unanswered. I am hoping that since in the past you have made edits to the Chobani page, you would like to continue helping to improve the article with what I believe are straightforward updates to keep the page current. Please examine my edit request, and if you agree that they improve the article, kindly implement them. Thanks in advance. Kait at Chobani (talk) 14:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)