Jump to content

Feminist theory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m using {{LGBT-footer}} rather than {{LGBT}}
Line 41: Line 41:


=== Feminist art history ===
=== Feminist art history ===
[[Linda Nochlin]] <ref>Nochlin, Linda, ""Why have There Been No Great Women Artists?" Thirty Years After". In: Armstrong, Carol and de Zegher, Catherine (eds). ''Women Artists as the Millennium''. Cambridge Massachusetts: October Books, MIT Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0-262-01226-3</ref>and [[Griselda Pollock]] <ref>Griselda Pollock, ''Looking Back to the Future''. New York: G&B New Arts Press, 2001. ISBN 90-5701-132-8</ref> <ref>Griselda Pollock, ''Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive''. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 0415413745</ref> are prominent art historians writing on contemporary and modern artists and articulating [[Art history]] from a feminist perspective since the 1970s.
[[Linda Nochlin]] <ref>Nochlin, Linda, ""Why have There Been No Great Women Artists?" Thirty Years After". In: Armstrong, Carol and de Zegher, Catherine (eds). ''Women Artists as the Millennium''. Cambridge Massachusetts: October Books, MIT Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0-262-01226-3</ref>and [[Griselda Pollock]] <ref>Griselda Pollock, ''Looking Back to the Future''. New York: G&B New Arts Press, 2001. ISBN 90-5701-132-8</ref> <ref>Griselda Pollock, ''Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive''. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 0415413745</ref> are prominent art historians writing on contemporary and modern artists and articulating [[Art history]] from a feminist perspective since the 1970s. Pollock works with French psychoanalysis, and in particular with Kristeva's and Ettinger's theories, to offer new insights into art history and contemporary art.


=== Feminist history ===
=== Feminist history ===

Revision as of 02:09, 14 January 2008

Feminist theory is the extension of feminism into theoretical, or philosophical, ground. It encompasses work done in a broad variety of disciplines, prominently including the approaches to women's roles and lives and feminist politics in anthropology and sociology, psychoanalysis, economics, women's and gender studies, feminist literary criticism, and philosophy especially Continental philosophy.[1]

Feminist theory aims to understand the nature of inequality and focuses on gender politics, power relations and sexuality. While generally providing a critique of social relations, much of feminist theory also focuses on analyzing gender inequality and the promotion of women's rights, interests, and issues. Themes explored in feminism include art history [2]and contemporary art[3][4], aesthetics[5][6], discrimination, stereotyping, objectification (especially sexual objectification), oppression, and patriarchy.[7][8][9]

History

Nancy Cott makes a distinction between modern feminism and its antecedents, particularly the struggle for suffrage. In the United States she places the turning point in the decades before and after women obtained the vote in 1920 (1910-1930). She argues that the prior woman movement was primarily about woman as a universal entity, whereas over this 20 year period it transformed itself into one primarily concerned with social differentiation, attentive to individuality and diversity. New issues dealt more with woman's condition as a social construct, gender identity, and relationships within and between genders. Politically this represented a shift from an ideological alignment comfortable with the right, to one more radically associated with the left.[10]

Susan Kingsley says that Freudian patriarchy was responsible for the diminished profile of feminism in the inter-war years,[11] others such as Juliet Mitchell consider this to be overly simplistic since Freudian theory is not wholly incompatible with feminism.[12] Some feminist scholarship shifted away from the need to establish the origins of family, and towards analyzing the process of patriarchy.[13] In the immediate postwar period, Simone de Beauvoir stood in opposition to an image of "the woman in the home". De Beauvoir provided an existentialist dimension to feminism with the publication of Le Deuxième Sexe (The Second Sex) in 1949.[14] As the title implies, the starting point is the implicit inferiority of women, and the first question de Beauvoir asks is "what is a woman"?.[15] Woman she realises is always perceived of as "other", "she is defined and differentiated with reference to man and not he with reference to her". In this book and her essay, "Woman: Myth & Reality", de Beauvoir anticipates Betty Friedan in seeking to demythologise the male concept of woman. "A myth invented by men to confine women to their oppressed`state. For women it is not a question of asserting themselves as women, but of becoming full-scale human beings." "One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman", or as Toril Moi puts it "a woman defines herself through the way she lives her embodied situation in the world, or in other words, through the way in which she makes something of what the world makes of her". Therefore, woman must regain subject, to escape her defined role as "other", as a Cartesian point of departure.[16] In her examination of myth, she appears as one who does not accept any special privileges for women. Ironically, feminist philosophers have had to extract de Beauvoir herself from out of the shadow of Jean-Paul Sartre to fully appreciate her.[17] While more philosopher and novelist than activist, she did sign one of the Mouvement de Libération des Femmes manifestos.

The resurgence of feminist activism in the late 1960s was accompanied by an emerging literature of what might be considered female associated issues, such as concerns for the earth and spirituality, and environmental activism.[18] This in turn created an atmosphere conducive to reigniting the study of and debate on matricentricity, as a rejection of determinism, such as Adrienne Rich[19] and Marilyn French[20] while for socialist feminists like Evelyn Reed,[21] patriarchy held the properties of capitalism.

Elaine Showalter describes the development of Feminist theory as having a number of phases. The first she calls "feminist critique" - where the feminist reader examines the ideologies behind literary phenomena. The second Showalter calls "Gynocritics" - where the "woman is producer of textual meaning" including "the psychodynamics of female creativity; linguistics and the problem of a female language; the trajectory of the individual or collective female literary career [and] literary history". The last phase she calls "gender theory" - where the "ideological inscription and the literary effects of the sex/gender system" are explored."[22] This model has been criticized by Toril Moi who sees it as an essentialist and deterministic model for female subjectivity. She also criticized it for not taking account of the situation for women outside the west.[23] From the 1970s onwards, psychoanalytical ideas that has been arising in the field of French feminism has gained a decisive influence on feminist theory. Feminist psychoanalysis deconstructed the phallic hypotheses regarding the Unconscious. Julia Kristeva, Luce Irigaray and Bracha Ettinger developed specific notions concerning unconscious sexual difference, the feminine and motherhood, with wide implications for film and literature analysis.[24]

Feminist disciplines

There are a number of distinct feminist disciplines, in which experts in other areas apply feminist techniques and principles to their own fields.

Feminist psychoanalysis

See also: Psychoanalysis

Psychoanalytic feminism is based on Freud and his psychoanalytic theories. It maintains that gender is not biological but is based on the psycho-sexual development of the individual. Psychoanalytical feminists believe that gender inequality comes from early childhood experiences, which lead men to believe themselves to be masculine, and women to believe themselves feminine. It is further maintained that gender leads to a social system that is dominated by males, which in turn influences the individual psycho-sexual development. As a solution it was suggested to avoid the gender-specific structuring of the society by male-female coeducation[8][9]. In the last 30 years, the contemporary French psychoanalytical theories concerning the feminine, that refer to sexual difference rather than to gender, with psychoanalysts like Julia Kristeva[25][25], Luce Irigaray[26][26] and Bracha L. Ettinger,[27][28] has largely influenced not only feminist theory but also the understanding of the subject in philosophy and the general field of psychoanalysis itself[29].

Feminist literary theory

Main article: Feminist literary criticism
See also: Gynocriticism

Feminist literary criticism is literary criticism informed by feminist theories or politics. Its history has been varied, from classic works of nineteenth-century women authors such as George Eliot and Margaret Fuller to cutting-edge theoretical work in women's studies and gender studies by "third-wave" authors.[30]

In the most general, feminist literary criticism before the 1970s was concerned with the politics of women's authorship and the representation of women's condition within literature.[30] Since the arrival of more complex conceptions of gender and subjectivity, feminist literary criticism has taken a variety of new routes. It has considered gender in the terms of Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis, as part of the deconstruction of existing power relations.[30]

Feminist film theory

Main article: Feminist film theory

Feminists have taken many different approaches to the analysis of cinema. These include discussions of the function of women characters in particular film narratives or in particular genres, such as film noir, where a woman character can often be seen to embody a subversive sexuality that is dangerous to men and is ultimately punished with death. In considering the way that films are put together, many feminist film critics have pointed to the "male gaze" that predominates in classical Hollywood film making. Through the use of various film techniques, such as shot reverse shot, the viewer is led to align herself with the point of view of a male protagonist. Notably, women function as objects of this gaze far more often than as proxies for the spectator.[31][32]. Feminist film theory of the last twenty years is heavily influenced by the general transformation in the field of aesthetics, including the new options of articulating the gaze, offered by psychoanalytical French feminism, and in particular by the Ettingerian notion of the matrixial gaze[33][34]. [35]

Feminist art history

Linda Nochlin [36]and Griselda Pollock [37] [38] are prominent art historians writing on contemporary and modern artists and articulating Art history from a feminist perspective since the 1970s. Pollock works with French psychoanalysis, and in particular with Kristeva's and Ettinger's theories, to offer new insights into art history and contemporary art.

Feminist history

Main article: Feminist history

Feminist history refers to the re-reading and re-interpretation of history from a feminist perspective. It is not the same as the history of feminism, which outlines the origins and evolution of the feminist movement. It also differs from women's history, which focuses on the role of women in historical events. The goal of feminist history is to explore and illuminate the female viewpoint of history through rediscovery of female writers, artists, philosophers, etc, in order to recover and demonstrate the significance of women's voices and choices in the past.[39][40][41][42][43]

Feminist geography

Main article: Feminist geography

Feminist geography is often considered part of a broader postmodern approach to the subject which is not primarily concerned with the development of conceptual theory in itself but rather focuses on the real experiences of individuals and groups in their own localities, upon the geographies that they live in within their own communities. In addition to its analysis of the real world, it also critiques existing geographical and social studies, arguing that academic traditions are delineated by patriarchy, and that contemporary studies which do not confront the nature of previous work reinforce the male bias of academic study.[44][45][46]

Feminist philosophy

Main article: Feminist philosophy

Feminist philosophy refers to philosophy approached from a feminist perspective. Feminist philosophy involves both attempts to use the methods of philosophy to further the cause of the feminist movements, and attempts to criticise or re-evaluate the ideas of traditional philosophy from within a feminist framework.[47]

There is no one school of feminist philosophy: feminist philosophers, as philosophers, are found in both the analytic and Continental traditions, and the myriad different viewpoints taken on philosophical issues within those traditions; and feminist philosophers, as feminists, are found belonging to the many different varieties of feminism.[47]

Feminist sexology

Main article: Feminist sexology

Feminist sexology is an offshoot of traditional studies of sexology that focuses on the intersectionality of sex and gender in relation to the sexual lives of women. Feminist sexology shares many principles with the wider field of sexology; in particular, it does not try to prescribe a certain path or “normality” for women's sexuality, but only observe and note the different and varied ways in which women express their sexuality. Looking at sexuality from a feminist point of view creates connections between the different aspects of a person's sexual life.[48]

Feminist economics

Main article: Feminist economics

Feminist economics broadly refers to a developing branch of economics that applies feminist insights and critiques to economics. Research under this heading is often interdisciplinary, critical, or heterodox. It encompasses debates about the relationship between feminism and economics on many levels: from applying mainstream economic methods to under-researched "women's" areas, to questioning how mainstream economics values the reproductive sector, to deeply philosophical critiques of economic epistemology and methodology.[citation needed]

One prominent issue that feminist economists investigate is how the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) does not adequately measure unpaid labor predominantly performed by women, such as housework, childcare, and eldercare.[49] Feminist economists have also challenged and exposed the rhetorical approach of mainstream economics.[50] They have made critiques of many basic assumptions of mainstream economics, including the Homo economicus model.[51] They have been instrumental in creating alternative models, such as the Capability Approach and incorporating gender into the analysis of economic data. Marilyn Power suggests that feminist economic methodology can be broken down into the following five categories:[52]

Main article: Feminist legal theory

The study of feminist legal theory is a school thought based on the common view that law's treatment of women in relation to men has not been equal or fair. The goals of feminist legal theory as defined by leading theorist Claire Dalton, consist of understanding and exploring the female experience, figuring out how law and institutions oppose females, and figuring out what changes can be committed to. This is to be accomplished through studying the connections between the law and gender as well as applying feminist analysis to concrete areas of law.[53][54][55]

References

  1. ^ Brabeck, M. and Brown, L. (with Christian, L., Espin, O., Hare-Mustin, R., Kaplan, A., Kaschak, E., Miller, D., Phillips, E., Ferns, T., and Van Ormer, A.) 'Feminist theory and psychological practice', in J. Worell and N. Johnson (eds.) Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1997), pp.15-35
  2. ^ Pollock, Griselda. Looking Back to the Future: Essays on Art, Life and Death. G&B Arts. 2001. ISBN 90-5701-132-8
  3. ^ de Zegher, Catherine. Inside the Visible. Massachusetts: MIT Press 1996
  4. ^ Armstrong, Carol and de Zegher, Catherine. Women Artists at the Millennium. Massachusetts: October Books / MIT Press 2006. ISBN 0-262-01226-X
  5. ^ Arnold, Dana and Iverson, Margaret (Eds.). Art and Thought. Blackwell. 2003. ISBN 0-631-22715-6
  6. ^ Florence, Penny and Foster, Nicola. Differential Aesthetics. Ashgate. 2000. ISBN 0-7546-1493-X
  7. ^ Gilligan, Carol, 'In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and Morality' in Harvard Educational Review (1977)
  8. ^ a b Chodorow, Nancy J., Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory (Yale University Press: 1989, 1991)
  9. ^ a b Lerman, Hannah, Feminist Ethics in Psychotherapy (Springer Publishing Company, 1990) ISBN 9780826162908
  10. ^ Cott, Nancy F. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987
  11. ^ Kent, Susan Kingsley. Making Peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Interwar Britain. Princeton, N.J. 1993
  12. ^ Mitchell, Juliet. Psychoanalysis and Feminism: Freud, Reich, Laing, and Women. New York 1975
  13. ^ Stocking, George W. Jr. After Tylor: British Social Anthropology, 1888–1951. Madison, Wisconsin 1995
  14. ^ Le Deuxième Sexe (online edition)
  15. ^ Moi, Toril. What is a Woman? And Other Essays. Oxford 2000
  16. ^ Bergoffen, Debra B. The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered Phenomenologies, Erotic Generosities. SUNY 1996 ISBN 0-7914-3151-7
  17. ^ Sullivan, Shannon. The work of Simone de Beauvoir: Introduction Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2000 14(2):v
  18. ^ Cite error: The named reference marler was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ Rich, Adrienne. Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution New York 1976
  20. ^ French, Marilyn. Beyond Power: On Women, Men, and Morals. New York 1985
  21. ^ Reed, Evelyn. Woman's Evolution: From Matriarchal Clan to Patriarchal Family. New York, 1975
  22. ^ Showalter, Elaine. 'Toward a Feminist Poetics: Women’s Writing and Writing About Women' in The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature and Theory (Random House, 1988), ISBN 9780394726472
  23. ^ Moi, Toril, Sexual/Textual Politics (Routledge, 2002), ISBN 9780415280129
  24. ^ Zajko, Vanda and Leonard, Miriam (eds.), Laughing with Medusa (Oxford University Press, 2006), ISBN 0-19-927438-X
  25. ^ a b Kristeva, Julia, Toril Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva Reader. NY: Columbia University Press, 1986. ISBN 0-231-06325-3 Cite error: The named reference "Kristeva" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  26. ^ a b Irigaray, Luce, Key Writings. London: Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-6940-X Cite error: The named reference "Irigaray" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  27. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L., The Matrixial Borderspace (University of Minnesota Press: 2006), ISBN 0-8166-3587-0
  28. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L., "Gaze-and-touching the Not Enough Mother" In: Eva Hesse Drawing. Edited by Catherine de Zegher. New Haven: Yale University Press. 183-213, 1996. ISBN 0-300-11618-7
  29. ^ Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 21 num. 1, 2004. ISSN 0263-2764
  30. ^ a b c Barry, Peter, 'Feminist Literary Criticism' in Beginning theory (Manchester University Press: 2002), ISBN 0719062683
  31. ^ Chaudhuri, Shohini, Feminist Film Theorists (Routledge, 2006) ISBN 9780415324335
  32. ^ Mulvey, Laura 'Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema' in Feminism and Film Theory. Ed. Constance Penley (Routledge, 1988)[1]
  33. ^ Ann Holly, Michael and Moxey, Keith. Art History, Aesthetics, Visual Studies. Clarck Studies in the Visual Arts. Distributed by yale University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-300-09789-1
  34. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L. "Matrixial Gaze and Screen". In: Doyle, Laura, Bodies of Resistance. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2001. ISBN 0-8101-1847-5
  35. ^ Pollock, Griselda. Psychoanalysis and the Image. Blackwell, 2006. ISBN 1-4051-3461-5
  36. ^ Nochlin, Linda, ""Why have There Been No Great Women Artists?" Thirty Years After". In: Armstrong, Carol and de Zegher, Catherine (eds). Women Artists as the Millennium. Cambridge Massachusetts: October Books, MIT Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0-262-01226-3
  37. ^ Griselda Pollock, Looking Back to the Future. New York: G&B New Arts Press, 2001. ISBN 90-5701-132-8
  38. ^ Griselda Pollock, Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 0415413745
  39. ^ Cain, William E., ed. Making Feminist History: The Literary Scholarship of Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar (Garland Publications, 1994)
  40. ^ Laslitt, Barbara, Ruth-Ellen B. Joeres, Mary Jo Maynes, Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham, and Jeanne Barker-Nunn, ed. History and Theory: Feminist Research, Debates, Contestations (University of Chicago Press, 1997)
  41. ^ Lerner, Gerda, The Majority Finds Its Past: Placing Women in History (Oxford University Press, 1981)
  42. ^ Pollock, Griselda. Generations and Geographies in the Visual Arts. London: Routledge, 1996. ISBN 0-415-14128-1
  43. ^ . de Zegher, Catherine and Teicher, Hendel (Eds.) 3 X Abstraction. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-300-10826-5
  44. ^ Rose, Gillian, Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge (Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1993)
  45. ^ Moss, Pamela, Feminisms in Geography: Rethinking Space, Place, and Knowledges (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007) ISBN 9780742538290
  46. ^ Welchman, John C., Rethinking Borders. Macmillan, 1996 ISBN 0-333-56580-0
  47. ^ a b Gatens, M., Feminism and Philosophy: Perspectives on Difference and Equality (Indiana University Press, 1991)
  48. ^ Tiefer, L., 'A feminist perspective on sexology and sexuality' in Mary M. Gergen (eds) Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge (New York University Press, 1989) ISBN 9780814730317
  49. ^ Waring, Marilyn, If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics,San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988.
  50. ^ Nelson, Julie A., "Gender, Metaphor, and the Definition of Economics," Economics and Philosophy 8(1), 1992; McCloskey, D. N. "Some Consequences of a Conjective Economics" in Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, ed. J.A. Nelson and M.A. Ferber, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. See also McCloskey critique.
  51. ^ Nelson, Julie A. and Marianne A. Ferber, Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
  52. ^ Power, Marilyn. "Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics" Feminist Economics. Volume 10, Number 3. Routledge, November 2004.
  53. ^ Dalton, Claire, 'Where We Stand: Observations on the Situation of Feminist Legal Thought' in Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations ed. by D. Kelly Weisberg (Temple University Press, 1993), ISBN 9781566390286
  54. ^ Dalton, Claire, 'Deconstructing Contract Doctrine' in Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender ed. by Katharine T. Bartlett and Rosanne Kennedy (Harper Collins, 1992)
  55. ^ Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender ed. by Katharine T. Bartlett and Rosanne Kennedy (Harper Collins, 1992), ISBN 9780813312484

See also

Template:Feminismfooter

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Feminist_theory&oldid=184173739"