User talk:Brian0918/Archive 30: Difference between revisions

Hello Brian, and welcome to Wikipedia. Re: the encyc. Frobozzia : more Zork information is a good thing! But it should be in the form of neat, structured encyclopedia articles, not random links to original sources. It will be excellent to have the original in Wikisource, and to have articles about Encyclopedia Frobozzia, the Zork Universe, etc.

That is, if someone searches for "Belwit" or "Belwit Flathead", they would automatically be redirected to the actual entry about Belwit Flathead in the Wikisource EF article

Redirection to original content is not our goal. When someone searches for these terms, they should not find a stub-article, or an original-source article (Wikipedia is not the place for original content), but a contextualized discussion of, say, Belwit Flathead. That would not be in an article devoted solely to B.F., but in a broader article with enough depth to mature into a good read, and with internal links to other Zork and EF content.

Cheers, (and looking forward to a wikisource update) +sj + 20:28, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Barnstar-eraser.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barnstar-eraser.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Your signature

How'd you do that? nedargehtni stercesruodeirubew 16:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. nedragehtni stercesruodeirubew 17:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gar, how'd you get it not to subst it as you save it? with the z? nedragehtni stercesruodeirubew 17:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No luck... does it work on Firefox? nedragehtni stercesruodeirubew 18:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! The button's there, but it's substed the time ¬¬ nedragehtni stercesruodeirubew 18:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And it's gone again. Oh well. nedragehtni stercesruodeirubew 18:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better Source-discription

Have you for commons:Image:Eichmann trial news story.ogg a more specific source descritption? Then i can choose the right license. I found this video only one time on an obscure pay-website. --Franz (Fg68at) de:Talk 17:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Brian,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Minstrel PosterBillyVanWare edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 8, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-04-08. howcheng {chat} 18:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shipwrecks of the 1913 Great Lakes storm

Please take a look at this. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 14:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

A couple of misplaced ships from the Big Blow of 1913.

John A. McGean

This wreck is listed as being proximate to Sturgeon Point Light. However, I found this on line, which indicates that it sank near Harbor Beach, Michigan.^[1] 7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

I've personally concluded that the McGean went down just east of Harbor Beach, Michigan. See what I wrote at Sturgeon Point Light, which contains references. I respectfully suggest that this be cleaned up in this article.7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Isaac M. Scott

Isaac M. Scott wreck is listed as being proximate to Sturgeon Point Light. However, the location of the wreck as described in the following article seems to contradict that.^[2] It states that mariners made certain assumptions about the likely direction of the vessel, and had wrongly guessed where it went down. It states: "In 1976, the wreck of the Scott was discovered at 175 feet about six to seven miles northeast of Thunder Bay Island. The vessel is upside down and half buried in the mud." 7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

I've personally concluded that the Scott went down 7 miles northeast of Thunder Bay Island. See what I wrote at Sturgeon Point Light, which contains references. I respectfully suggest that this be cleaned up in this article.7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MontyPythonHolyGrailCastShot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MontyPythonHolyGrailCastShot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 14:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:American_Civil_War_Theaters.png

Thanks for uploading Image:American_Civil_War_Theaters.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Barnstar-lightbulb-noamb.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barnstar-lightbulb-noamb.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Barnstar-lightbulb.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barnstar-lightbulb.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the comment on my talk page - especially coming from someone who has written so many DYK articles! :-) --Grimhelm (talk) 21:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your entry on WP:FACE

Hi Brian. I'm sending this message to every user who has an entry on Wikipedia's Facebook but whose picture is currently not visible for some reason. If you are interested in keeping your place on that page, then please restore the image or insert a new one into it. If you do not respond to this message within a week however, I will remove the entry. See Wikipedia talk:Facebook#Removal of empty spaces for more info. Cheers, Face 13:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC) PS: My name is a coincidence.[reply]

Image:Barnstar-lightbulb3.png

Hi, please see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Barnstar-lightbulb3.png, as I have proposed a new design. --Kjetil r (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Update is five hours late, if you'd like to post it. Gatoclass (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, done. Thanks anyhow. Gatoclass (talk) 14:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Comicboxnotice

A template you created, Template:Comicboxnotice, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 04:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts

Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Wizardman 18:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AtLastthe1948ShowCast.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AtLastthe1948ShowCast.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Acheri

Merger proposed

I'm proposing a merger on an article you worked on. Since the shelf clouds and roll clouds are subset of the arcus clouds, they should be integrated into the later article. This would make a more complete article instead of splitting the information among three articles. Anwer in Talk:arcus cloud.

Pierre cb (talk) 04:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias in ITN?

The fact that it has the capability to attack Israel is the main reason for it being newsworthy. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I'll check for sources and stuff for that, cheers. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 15:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wikt:User:Brian0918/Hotlist

Hey, msh210 from enwikt here. I'm posting this message here because your talkpage there redirects (so to speak) hither. There's discussion on wikt:WT:RFDO about renaming wikt:Category:Requested articles to wikt:Category:Requested entries. That woudl entail modifying your hotlist pages, which are in the former. Do you have any objection to others' editing your hotlist pages to change the cat?—msh210℠ 22:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sand Martin

Hi, I removed the pic because it got two opposes almost straight off the bat and I didn't think it was worth continuing with it. Do you think I should stick it back on?-- Seahamlass 12:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Respect Thread Conversions

I'm looking for folks to help convert Respect Threads to wiki formatting on Project Fanboy: WikiFans. Respect Threads, showcase scans of feats performed by comic book characters and have gained an audience on several comic book message boards. A few other wiki editors and myself are trying to convert them from the unprofessional look of a bunch of posts on a message board to the formatting common with WikiMedia wiki's. To view an example of what we're doing, here is a link to Respect Silver Surfer.

I was wondering if you might have time to contribute your comic book knowledge and/or scans of comic book characters performing feats, and help us out with our Respect Articles project?Millennium Cowboy (talk) 02:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Along the River During the Qingming Festival

I just want to delist the nomination and delete the image and start all over again because everybody that voted did not all vote for the same version which is not fair. Also I do not like how when you look on commons it says there are like 4 different versions of it. I just want there to be one version, the original version, and I want it to be under my name so I get credit for it. Daniel Chiswick (talk) 23:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qingming

Well can you help me? I really want to see this picture featured but I am screwing this up and I need some help because I have never nominated a picture before. Daniel Chiswick (talk) 14:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Battle of Perryville.png

Image:Battle of Perryville.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Battle of Perryville.png and Image:Battle of Malvern Hill.png as Commons:Image:Battle of Malvern Hill.png. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Battle of Perryville.png]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Battles of Quantrill's Raid into Kansas of the American Civil War

Category:Battles of Quantrill's Raid into Kansas of the American Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 21:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Campaignbox Quantrill's Raid into Kansas

Template:Campaignbox Quantrill's Raid into Kansas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 16:33, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spammy DYK update/housekeeping-type notice

HI (sorry 'bout the spammy note), DYK updates have been a bit slow and there's a bit of a shortage of admins actively involved. We are asking folks who listed themselves on Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins to update details on this page - User:Olaf Davis/DYKadmins, so we can grade everyone's involvement (and who, knows, someone may want to get involved more :) ). Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gallery of 1913 Great Lakes storm images/Cleveland images

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gallery of 1913 Great Lakes storm images/Cleveland images, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gallery of 1913 Great Lakes storm images/Other images

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gallery of 1913 Great Lakes storm images/Other images, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BrandNewMontyPythonPapperbok.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BrandNewMontyPythonPapperbok.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN, AIG, and POV (TLA hell)

Noting this change, how is Fed "rescues AIG from likely bankruptcy" POV? I based it on the NY Times' description. I don't intend to revert this, I'm just interested in sharpening my understanding of NPOV. Cheers.--chaser - t 19:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gallery of 1913 Great Lakes storm images

I have nominated Gallery of 1913 Great Lakes storm images, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of 1913 Great Lakes storm images. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 08:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All faiths united are involved edwardcares83@msn.com

Hi, i am Edward Pavelka;

I was over in Germany and visited most of the concentration camps. The ground i stood on was gravel like material but was bones of the living flesh of the final solution.

I actually cried when i saw the devistation, and the stench was still evident in the air and in the chamber courters.

For all the humans that indured the unthinkable, their souls are more at peace than any of our souls will ever be. When my time comes to pass on, i hope to meet these blessed souls.

edward pavelka United States Marines 87 battallion unit screaming eagles 1985-2005

May God bless the redeemers that helped the living, become free again

God Bless the British,American,Scotish soldiers that recieved many blessings for doing so.

thank you

edwardcares83@msn.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.76.22 (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

stop deleting important articles!!!!!!!!!! ##%#@@#$@$%$%$#@#$@#$#@ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.172.116.211 (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:James Harlan.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:James Harlan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Macgyver.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Macgyver.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs at "Norman Borlaug"

Hello, I'm a Japanese wikipedian. I saw two graphs made by you at the Norman Borlaug. Because I want to use this file for Japanese Wikipedia at green revolution, I uploaded it into Comonns. The names of those are same as original one, and those were categorized into "Wheat" and "Agricultural charts/Agricultural graphs". Thank you. Janus01 (talk) 08:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DoNotAdjustYourSetCast.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DoNotAdjustYourSetCast.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obesity

Recent study that addresses your question:

http://www.medicalpost.com/therapeutics/nutrition/article.jsp?content=20080818_121920_25640

--Doc James (talk) 14:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wyatt Earp#Life after Tombstone

File:Wyattearp1.jpg

Wyatt Earp at about age 39, photo in San Diego about 1887

Please, replace his photograph by the better one http://www.azadventuretours.com/images/wyatt_earp.jpg.

Offered image is the same photo, but larger and has bigger resolution.

Sorry, for disturbing you, but i can not do this myself. Minchenko Michael (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FPC Result Template

Hi Brian,

I see you were instrumental in creating Template:FPCresult.

Just a question you may be able to help with. On the talkpage Template talk:FPCresult it says "The bot will assume that anything without the leading keyword Image: means that the picture was not promoted". I'm not sure what the bot mentioned actually does, or even why the template is necessary, so perhaps you can provide some information.

With the change of pictures to have the lead word File rather than Image, how should they be closed? Will there be any problems with discrepant names being used, or a problem if people close using File rather than Image?

See for example Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Alstroemeria aurantiaca.jpg, where File:Alstroemeria aurantiaca.jpg has been closed with {{FPCresult|Promoted|Image:Alstroemeria aurantiaca.JPG}}, or conversely Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Dakota, 1890 where the closer has used the File leader.

Thanks for any input you can give, --jjron (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway. AllyUnion hasn't edited since a single edit in November and before that not since May, so I'd tend to say he's MIA, which is why I thought I'd try you first. May have a bit more of a look into it. --jjron (talk) 11:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I just ran across one of our old haunts and I figured I would drop in and say hello! Cheers! – Clockwork Soul 01:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rand

I just wished to clarify that I wasn't conceding that her position could be justified as plausible, no matter how we interpret it. I'll try harder to refrain from calling her crackers and what not. I can do it. I can stop calling Rand bonkers in the interests of civility. I vow to no longer distract from the discussion by calling her bonkers, crackers, and the like. It's hard, but I realize that it's inappropriate. CABlankenship (talk) 19:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Battles for Jackson's Operations Against the B&O Railroad of the American Civil War

Category:Battles for Jackson's Operations Against the B&O Railroad of the American Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. McMuff (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NAS

Long ago you made the first version of the List of members of the National Academy of Sciences, as a table. I now want to do the same for the National Academy of Engineering. Did you prepare it manually or use a template of some sort? I'm prepared to do it by search and replace in an external editor from the sectional lists, but I hope there's an easier way. DGG (talk) 09:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Campaignbox Operations near Saint Mark's

A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox Operations near Saint Mark's requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 16:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HI

[

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Table of Mechanicks, Cyclopaedia, Volume 2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Table of Mechanicks, Cyclopaedia, Volume 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arrested Development - Rita.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arrested Development - Rita.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Delist nom

A featured picture you nominated, Wrightflyer.jpg, has recently been nominated for delisting. Please feel free to weigh in on the discussion. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 16:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia background image

Hi! I was wondering, where did you get File:Headbg.jpg? I see you were the initial uploader for that file, could I ask about your source? If you remember that long ago(!) Anxietycello (talk) 03:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alphos

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alphos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I own several unabridged dermatology texts and cannot find a reliable secondary source for this content.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. kilbad (talk) 20:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kermit0918.ogg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kermit0918.ogg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Haskell Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Haskell Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:BroochAquamarinePlatinumDiamonds.gif

Thanks for uploading File:BroochAquamarinePlatinumDiamonds.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Infocom logo.png

File:Infocom logo.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Infocom logo.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Infocom logo.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battle of Fort Sanders.png is now available as Commons:File:Battle of Fort Sanders.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AcomaPuebloFromDistance.jpg is now available as Commons:File:AcomaPuebloFromDistance.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hieronymus Bosch - The Garden of Earthly Delights - 3.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hieronymus Bosch - The Garden of Earthly Delights - Hell.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Terry Gilliam Elephants.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Terry Gilliam Elephants.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andrew c ^[talk] 00:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lupin's popups

I am trying to find out if I can use Lupin's popups on Wikia, and if someone would be able to help me out with it's install. Lupin is away, and you were listed as one of the helpers. Any help you can give me would be appreciated. 68.226.0.35 (talk) 01:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unattributed use of your photo

Hi Brian! Today in a coffee shop in Somerville MA (Bloc 11) I saw some drawings obviously based on your caribou FP for sale without attribution. The artist is Peter Rubijono. I'm not sure if you care or not. I took a digital photo of one of the drawings and could email it to you if you want. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Borlaug

I have nominated Norman Borlaug for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ceroma

The article Ceroma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been copied to Wiktionary. Not a notable enough subject for its own Wikipedia page. Not linked to any other page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sophitessa (talk) 20:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cessor

The article Cessor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been copied to Wiktionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sophitessa (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ceroma

I have nominated Ceroma, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceroma. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sophitessa (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Brian0918. You have new messages at Arrant's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've marked this page for WP:PROD. It was a redirect to Knight-errant, but the two words are unrelated. SimonTrew (talk) 11:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAR Review

I have nominated Arrested Development (TV series) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Torsodog^Talk 19:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist nomination

Hi, just to let you know that the an image you previously nominated to Wikipedia Featured Pictures is being nominated for delisting, at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Plunging bronco, Bar Diamond Bar range. Mostlyharmless (talk) 04:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CleeseChapman1948Show.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CleeseChapman1948Show.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andrew c ^[talk] 17:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:GOB on stage.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GOB on stage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 06:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:"

Template:" has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Hairy Dude (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AMAZING!!!

Wow. You're a Master Editor?! That must have taken YEARS to accomplish (5, to be precise :) ). I hope I might someday be as accomplished as you! However, all your awards and barnstars all seem to be so serious, so...

		The Oddball Barnstar
		Awarded to you for your many serious accomplishments, and for providing a reason for pursuing the Master Editor Award.

Thanks!--Jakkinx (talk) 00:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)|}[reply]

Now, I also would like to ask for your help with a little project of mine, called Create Barnstars, basically, it is a page designed for Users to display Barnstars they have made themselves, talk about Barnstars and about making Barnstars, and make special Barnstars that are made just to look cool, fun, awarded personally by the User who made them. You can check out the page if you are interested here. Thanks again!

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Bison skull pile

Hi, apologies for not delivering this notice sooner. You seemed to be nearly inactive. A featured picture you nominated in 2005 has come up for review. You may wish to participate. Durova³⁵⁷ 03:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops!

Feel free to edit out my offer from the Barnstar above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakkinx (talk • contribs) 00:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP delist nom

Just so you know, I have nominated File:Oceans.png for delist. Feel free to leave a comment. upstate NYer 22:01, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clancularii

An article you created, Clancularii has been proposed for deletion. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 15:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lock icon.gif

Hi Brian0918. Back in 2005 you uploaded File:Lock icon.gif . It is not clear from its image description page if you are the author of that image, or just uploaded it as a copy since it is the lock icon used by the Wikimedia projects. And in case you didn't make that image, how did you know what license to put on it?

The reason I would like to know is that I am going to copy that image to Commons, so I would like to have the right data on the image description page there. (I use that image in the {{sec link auto}} template. And my templates tend to be copied to many of the other Wikimedia projects, so the image needs to be available on Commons.)

If/when you have answered or simply updated that image page, could you poke me on my talk page?

--David Göthberg (talk) 05:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Aldred

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Robert Aldred requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Abductive (reasoning) 05:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Water Cycle Image

Is it possible for me to use this image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrosphere)and adapt it to my language ( Irish Gaelic) for use on the article which I have started to translate on http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidrisf%C3%A9ar Eog1916 (talk) 15:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Robert Aldred

An article that you have been involved in editing, Robert Aldred, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Aldred. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abductive (reasoning) 23:02, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Brian0918! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 292 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Hólmfríður Karlsdóttir - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of fictional future events

You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 18:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, Brian0918/Archive 30! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello; can I ask you a rename please?

Hello, my name is Andrea and I'm Italian.

Can I ask you a rename of a file?

I posted already the TAG requesting the rename time ago but nothing happened.

The file is:

File:ÇFDFE.jpg

and the motivation is:

It has been suggested that this media object be renamed to "File:Napoli_CastelDellOvo_02.jpg" or another more suitable name for the following reason: the current name is difficult to be indicized, the new name reflects the actual image info to be indicized

Thank you, ciao
Decio Mure (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service award update

Hello, Brian0918! The requirements for the service awards have been updated, and you may no longer be eligible for the award you currently display. Don't worry! Since you have already earned your award, you are free to keep displaying it. However, you may also wish to update to the current system.

Sorry for any inconvenience. — the Man in Question (in question) 10:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:202.82.33.202

Hi, Brian. Did you check the history of this IP? The IP is static and belongs to Edward Nilges, who is User:Spinoza1111. I find a block of 31 hours quite ridiculous for someone who continues to evade an indefinite block with the same behavior over and over again, especially after three 6 month blocks.--Atlan (talk) 19:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good one, thanks.--Atlan (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Angelici

The article Angelici has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hoax & unfounded claims, per talk page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 10:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Angelici

Hello! Regardless of the Cyclopedia source, this is extremely dubious information. There were no chivalric orders in the Western sense in Byzantium, and titles such as those supposedly used where never in use in the Byzantine Empire. A 1728 source is also not the most reliable guide on historical issues. As I have written on the talk page, this appears to be this order, which does claim Byzantine heritage but has no recorded history before the 16th century. The article should be redirected & merged with the Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George, with a proper explanation that its founding myth is exactly that, at the very least. Constantine ✍ 10:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:New york police department car-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:New york police department car-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:New york police department car-2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New york police department car-2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Caribou from Wagon Trails.jpg

Hi, the above discussion may be of interest to you. J Milburn (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 00:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Robert Wadlow at 10, Edwardsville Intelligencer (Edwardsville, Illinois), 1928 March 17.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Robert Wadlow at 10, Edwardsville Intelligencer (Edwardsville, Illinois), 1928 March 17.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bosch-musicians-hell.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bosch-musicians-hell.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bosch-musicians-hell.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bosch-musicians-hell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darryl Wright

The article Darryl Wright has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RL0919 (talk) 23:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lester H. Hunt

The article Lester H. Hunt has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Poorly sourced and with no indication of the subject's notability.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bkalafut (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Mayhew (philosopher)

The article Robert Mayhew (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Unsourced and with no indication of the subject's notability.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bkalafut (talk) 06:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita.

Text 123

They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas.

Text 124

These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava".

Text 125

Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished.

Text 126

Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening.

Text 127

By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava.

Text 128

No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava.

Text 129

Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava.

Text 130

One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down.

Text 131

Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone.

Text 132

Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish.

Text 133

Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise.

Text 134

Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself.

Text 135

By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas.

Text 136

By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu.

Text 137

Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's glories

Text 138

I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants.

Text 139

A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya.

Text 140

Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life.

Text 141

Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew.

Text 142

Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha!

Text 143

O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy?

Text 144

Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life.

Text 145

Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place?

Text 146

Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart.

Text 147

I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts.

Text 148

The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet.

[1] Point aux Barques Lighthouse Society on John V. McGean.

[2] Northeast dive news, Isaac M. Scott.

[1]

[2]