Jump to content

Richard Dawkins: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
External links: Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath Debate, Uncut Edition
Evolutionary biology: Surprisingly this is missing fromt he article.
Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
Line 119: Line 119:


In a set of controversies over the mechanisms and interpretation of evolution (what has been called 'The Darwin Wars'),<ref>{{cite book |title=The Darwin Wars: How stupid genes became selfish genes |last=Brown |first=Andrew |authorlink=Andrew Brown (writer) |year=1999 |publisher=London: Simon and Schuster |isbn=0-684-85144-X |pages= }}</ref><ref name="AndrewBrown2000">{{cite book | last= Brown| first= Andrew| title= The Darwin Wars: The Scientific Battle for the Soul of Man| year = 2000| publisher= Touchstone| location= London |isbn= 0-684-85145-8}}</ref> one faction is often named after Dawkins, while the other faction is named after the American palaeontologist [[Stephen Jay Gould]], reflecting the pre-eminence of each as a populariser of the pertinent ideas.<ref name="Brockman">{{cite book | title= The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution | author= Brockman, J.| year=1995 | publisher=Simon & Schuster| location = New York |isbn=0-684-80359-3}}</ref><ref name="Sterelny">{{cite book | title= [[Dawkins vs. Gould|Dawkins vs. Gould: Survival of the Fittest]] | author= Sterelny, K. |authorlink=Kim Sterelny| year=2007 | publisher=Icon Books| location = Cambridge, UK |isbn=1-84046-780-0}} Also ISBN 978-1-84046-780-2</ref> In particular, Dawkins and Gould have been prominent commentators in the controversy over [[sociobiology]] and [[evolutionary psychology]], with Dawkins generally approving and Gould generally being critical.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Evolutionists |last=Morris |first=Richard |year=2001 |publisher=W. H. Freeman |isbn=0-7167-4094-X}}</ref> A typical example of Dawkins's position is his scathing review of ''[[Not in Our Genes]]'' by [[Steven Rose]], [[Leon J. Kamin]], and Richard C. Lewontin.<ref>{{Cite news | last=Dawkins | first=Richard | publication-date=24 January 1985 | title=Sociobiology: the debate continues | periodical=New Scientist | url=http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Reviews/1985-01-24notinourgenes.shtml | accessdate=2008-04-03|archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080501043602/http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Reviews/1985-01-24notinourgenes.shtml |archivedate =2008-05-01|deadurl=yes}}</ref> Two other thinkers who are often considered to be allied with Dawkins on the subject are [[Steven Pinker]] and [[Daniel Dennett]]; Dennett has promoted a gene-centred view of evolution and defended [[reductionism]] in biology.<ref>{{cite book |title=Darwin's Dangerous Idea |last=Dennett |first=Daniel |authorlink=Daniel Dennett |year=1995 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |location=United States |isbn=0-684-80290-2}}</ref> Despite their academic disagreements, Dawkins and Gould did not have a hostile personal relationship, and Dawkins dedicated a large portion of his 2003 book ''[[A Devil's Chaplain]]'' posthumously to Gould, who had died the previous year.
In a set of controversies over the mechanisms and interpretation of evolution (what has been called 'The Darwin Wars'),<ref>{{cite book |title=The Darwin Wars: How stupid genes became selfish genes |last=Brown |first=Andrew |authorlink=Andrew Brown (writer) |year=1999 |publisher=London: Simon and Schuster |isbn=0-684-85144-X |pages= }}</ref><ref name="AndrewBrown2000">{{cite book | last= Brown| first= Andrew| title= The Darwin Wars: The Scientific Battle for the Soul of Man| year = 2000| publisher= Touchstone| location= London |isbn= 0-684-85145-8}}</ref> one faction is often named after Dawkins, while the other faction is named after the American palaeontologist [[Stephen Jay Gould]], reflecting the pre-eminence of each as a populariser of the pertinent ideas.<ref name="Brockman">{{cite book | title= The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution | author= Brockman, J.| year=1995 | publisher=Simon & Schuster| location = New York |isbn=0-684-80359-3}}</ref><ref name="Sterelny">{{cite book | title= [[Dawkins vs. Gould|Dawkins vs. Gould: Survival of the Fittest]] | author= Sterelny, K. |authorlink=Kim Sterelny| year=2007 | publisher=Icon Books| location = Cambridge, UK |isbn=1-84046-780-0}} Also ISBN 978-1-84046-780-2</ref> In particular, Dawkins and Gould have been prominent commentators in the controversy over [[sociobiology]] and [[evolutionary psychology]], with Dawkins generally approving and Gould generally being critical.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Evolutionists |last=Morris |first=Richard |year=2001 |publisher=W. H. Freeman |isbn=0-7167-4094-X}}</ref> A typical example of Dawkins's position is his scathing review of ''[[Not in Our Genes]]'' by [[Steven Rose]], [[Leon J. Kamin]], and Richard C. Lewontin.<ref>{{Cite news | last=Dawkins | first=Richard | publication-date=24 January 1985 | title=Sociobiology: the debate continues | periodical=New Scientist | url=http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Reviews/1985-01-24notinourgenes.shtml | accessdate=2008-04-03|archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080501043602/http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Reviews/1985-01-24notinourgenes.shtml |archivedate =2008-05-01|deadurl=yes}}</ref> Two other thinkers who are often considered to be allied with Dawkins on the subject are [[Steven Pinker]] and [[Daniel Dennett]]; Dennett has promoted a gene-centred view of evolution and defended [[reductionism]] in biology.<ref>{{cite book |title=Darwin's Dangerous Idea |last=Dennett |first=Daniel |authorlink=Daniel Dennett |year=1995 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |location=United States |isbn=0-684-80290-2}}</ref> Despite their academic disagreements, Dawkins and Gould did not have a hostile personal relationship, and Dawkins dedicated a large portion of his 2003 book ''[[A Devil's Chaplain]]'' posthumously to Gould, who had died the previous year.

Dawkins believes - in light of the complex logic on display in the genetic code - it is entirely possible that life on earth was seeded by an alien life-form, implying the reluctance to accept the standard Darwinian line that life boot-strapped its way out of the primordial soup<ref>Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal By Amarnath Amarasingam, p. 65. Originally mentioned by Dawkins in 2008 film [[Expelled]]</ref>.


Dawkins's book ''[[The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution]]'' expounds the [[evidence of common descent|evidence for biological evolution]],<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thebookseller.com/news/52925-transworld-signs-new-book-from-dawkins.html |title=Transworld signs new book from Dawkins |accessdate=2009-01-12 |date=15 February 2008 |publisher=The Bookseller}}</ref> and coincided with [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s [[anniversary|bicentennial]] year.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |year=2009 |publisher=Transworld Publishers |isbn=0-593-06173-X |location=London |pages=xii }}</ref>
Dawkins's book ''[[The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution]]'' expounds the [[evidence of common descent|evidence for biological evolution]],<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thebookseller.com/news/52925-transworld-signs-new-book-from-dawkins.html |title=Transworld signs new book from Dawkins |accessdate=2009-01-12 |date=15 February 2008 |publisher=The Bookseller}}</ref> and coincided with [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s [[anniversary|bicentennial]] year.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |year=2009 |publisher=Transworld Publishers |isbn=0-593-06173-X |location=London |pages=xii }}</ref>

Revision as of 14:44, 23 September 2012

Richard Dawkins
Dawkins in 2010 at Cooper Union in New York City
Born
Clinton Richard Dawkins

(1941-03-26) 26 March 1941 (age 83)
NationalityBritish
EducationMA, DPhil (Oxon)
Alma materBalliol College, Oxford
OccupationEthologist
Years active1967–present
Employer(s)University of California, Berkeley
University of Oxford
Organization(s)Fellow of the Royal Society
Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature
Known forgene-centred view of evolution, concept of the meme, as well as advocacy of atheism and science.
Notable workThe Selfish Gene (1976)
The Extended Phenotype (1982)
The Blind Watchmaker (1986)
The God Delusion (2006)
Spouse(s)Marian Stamp Dawkins (m. 1967–1984)
Eve Barham (m. 1984–?)
Lalla Ward (m. 1992–present)
ChildrenJuliet Emma Dawkins (born 1984)
Parent(s)Clinton John Dawkins
Jean Mary Vyvyan (née Ladner)
AwardsZSL Silver Medal (1989)
Faraday Award (1990)
Kistler Prize (2001)
Scientific career
ThesisSelective pecking in the domestic chick (1967)
Doctoral advisorNikolaas Tinbergen
Doctoral studentsAlan Grafen, Mark Ridley
WebsiteThe Richard Dawkins Foundation

Clinton Richard Dawkins, FRS, FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is an English ethologist, evolutionary biologist[1] and author. He is an emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford,[2] and was the University of Oxford's Professor for Public Understanding of Science from 1995 until 2008.[3]

Dawkins came to prominence with his 1976 book The Selfish Gene, which popularised the gene-centred view of evolution and introduced the term meme. In 1982, he introduced into evolutionary biology the influential concept that the phenotypic effects of a gene are not necessarily limited to an organism's body, but can stretch far into the environment, including the bodies of other organisms; this concept is presented in his book, The Extended Phenotype.[4]

Dawkins is an atheist, a vice president of the British Humanist Association, and a supporter of the Brights movement.[5] He is well known for his criticism of creationism and intelligent design. In his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker, he argues against the watchmaker analogy, an argument for the existence of a supernatural creator based upon the complexity of living organisms. Instead, he describes evolutionary processes as analogous to a blind watchmaker. He has since written several popular science books, and makes regular television and radio appearances, predominantly discussing these topics. In his 2006 book The God Delusion, Dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that religious faith is a delusion—"a fixed false belief".[6] As of January 2010, the English-language version has sold more than two million copies and had been translated into 31 languages.[7]

Biography

Dawkins was born in Nairobi, Kenya.[8] His father, Clinton John Dawkins (1915–2010),[9] was an agricultural civil servant in the British colonial service in Nyasaland (now Malawi). Dawkins has a younger sister.[10] His father was called up into the King's African Rifles during World War II;[11][12] he returned to England in 1949, when Dawkins was eight. His father had inherited a country estate, Over Norton Park, which he turned into a commercial farm.[9] Both his parents were interested in natural sciences; they answered Dawkins's questions in scientific terms.[13]

Dawkins describes his childhood as "a normal Anglican upbringing".[14] He was confirmed, and embraced Christianity until his mid-teens, at which point he concluded that the theory of evolution was a better explanation for life's complexity, and ceased believing in a god.[10] Dawkins states: "the main residual reason why I was religious was from being so impressed with the complexity of life and feeling that it had to have a designer, and I think it was when I realised that Darwinism was a far superior explanation that pulled the rug out from under the argument of design. And that left me with nothing."[10]

He attended Oundle School, an English public school with a distinct Church of England flavour,[10] from 1954 to 1959, where he was in Laundimer house.[15] He studied zoology at Balliol College, Oxford, graduating in 1962; while there, he was tutored by Nobel Prize-winning ethologist Nikolaas Tinbergen. He continued as a research student under Tinbergen's supervision, receiving his M.A. and D.Phil. degrees by 1966, and remained a research assistant for another year.[8] Tinbergen was a pioneer in the study of animal behaviour, particularly in the areas of instinct, learning and choice;[16] Dawkins's research in this period concerned models of animal decision-making.[17]

From 1967 to 1969, he was an assistant professor of zoology at the University of California, Berkeley. During this period, the students and faculty at UC Berkeley were largely opposed to the ongoing Vietnam War, and Dawkins became heavily involved in the anti-war demonstrations and activities.[18] He returned to the University of Oxford in 1970, taking a position as a lecturer. In 1990, he became a reader in zoology. In 1995, he was appointed Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford, a position that had been endowed by Charles Simonyi with the express intention that the holder "be expected to make important contributions to the public understanding of some scientific field",[19] and that its first holder should be Richard Dawkins.[20]

Since 1970, he has been a fellow of New College, Oxford.[21] He has delivered a number of inaugural and other lectures, including the Henry Sidgwick Memorial Lecture (1989), the first Erasmus Darwin Memorial Lecture (1990), the Michael Faraday Lecture (1991), the T. H. Huxley Memorial Lecture (1992), the Irvine Memorial Lecture (1997), the Sheldon Doyle Lecture (1999), the Tinbergen Lecture (2004) and the Tanner Lectures (2003).[8] In 1991, he gave the Royal Institution Christmas Lectures for Children. He has also served as editor of a number of journals, and has acted as editorial advisor to the Encarta Encyclopedia and the Encyclopedia of Evolution. He is a senior editor of the Council for Secular Humanism's Free Inquiry magazine, for which he also writes a column. He has been a member of the editorial board of Skeptic magazine since its foundation.[22]

He has sat on judging panels for awards as diverse as the Royal Society's Faraday Award and the British Academy Television Awards,[8] and has been president of the Biological Sciences section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2004, Balliol College, Oxford instituted the Dawkins Prize, awarded for "outstanding research into the ecology and behaviour of animals whose welfare and survival may be endangered by human activities".[23] In September 2008, he retired from his professorship, announcing plans to "write a book aimed at youngsters in which he will warn them against believing in 'anti-scientific' fairytales."[24]

Personal life

On 19 August 1967, Dawkins married fellow ethologist Marian Stamp in Annestown, County Waterford, Ireland;[25] they divorced in 1984. Later that same year, on 1 June, he married Eve Barham (19 August 1951[26]–28 February 1999) in Oxford. They had a daughter, Juliet Emma Dawkins (born 1984, Oxford).[26] Dawkins and Barham also divorced.[27] In 1992, he married actress Lalla Ward[27] in Kensington and Chelsea, London.[26] Dawkins met her through their mutual friend Douglas Adams,[28] who had worked with her on the BBC's Doctor Who.

Work

Evolutionary biology

Dawkins at the University of Texas at Austin, March 2008

In his scientific works, Dawkins is best known for his popularisation of the gene as the principal unit of selection in evolution; this view is most clearly set out in his books:[29]

Dawkins has consistently been sceptical about non-adaptive processes in evolution (such as spandrels, described by Gould and Lewontin)[30] and about selection at levels "above" that of the gene.[31] He is particularly sceptical about the practical possibility or importance of group selection as a basis for understanding altruism.[32] This behaviour appears at first to be an evolutionary paradox, since helping others costs precious resources and decreases one's own fitness. Previously, many had interpreted this as an aspect of group selection: Individuals are doing what is best for the survival of the population or species as a whole. British evolutionary biologist W. D. Hamilton had used the gene-centred view to explain altruism in terms of inclusive fitness and kin selection—that individuals behave altruistically toward their close relatives, who share many of their own genes.[33][a] Similarly, Robert Trivers, thinking in terms of the gene-centred model, developed the theory of reciprocal altruism, whereby one organism provides a benefit to another in the expectation of future reciprocation.[34] Dawkins popularised these ideas in The Selfish Gene, and developed them in his own work.[35]

He has also been strongly critical of the Gaia philosophy theory of the independent scientist James Lovelock.[36][37][38]

Critics of Dawkins's approach suggest that taking the gene as the unit of selection (a single event in which an individual either succeeds or fails to reproduce) is misleading; the gene could be better described, they say, as a unit of evolution (the long-term changes in allele frequencies in a population).[39] In The Selfish Gene, Dawkins explains that he is using George C. Williams's definition of the gene as "that which segregates and recombines with appreciable frequency."[40] Another common objection is that a gene cannot survive alone, but must cooperate with other genes to build an individual, and therefore a gene cannot be an independent "unit".[41] In The Extended Phenotype, Dawkins suggests that from an individual gene's viewpoint, all other genes are part of the environment to which it is adapted.

Advocates for higher levels of selection (such as Richard Lewontin, David Sloan Wilson, and Elliot Sober) suggest that there are many phenomena (including altruism) that gene-based selection cannot satisfactorily explain. The philosopher Mary Midgley, with whom Dawkins clashed in print concerning The Selfish Gene,[42][43] has criticised gene selection, memetics, and sociobiology as being excessively reductionist;[44] she has suggested that the popularity of Dawkins's work is due to factors in the Zeitgeist such as the increased individualism of the Thatcher/Reagan decades.[45]

In a set of controversies over the mechanisms and interpretation of evolution (what has been called 'The Darwin Wars'),[46][47] one faction is often named after Dawkins, while the other faction is named after the American palaeontologist Stephen Jay Gould, reflecting the pre-eminence of each as a populariser of the pertinent ideas.[48][49] In particular, Dawkins and Gould have been prominent commentators in the controversy over sociobiology and evolutionary psychology, with Dawkins generally approving and Gould generally being critical.[50] A typical example of Dawkins's position is his scathing review of Not in Our Genes by Steven Rose, Leon J. Kamin, and Richard C. Lewontin.[51] Two other thinkers who are often considered to be allied with Dawkins on the subject are Steven Pinker and Daniel Dennett; Dennett has promoted a gene-centred view of evolution and defended reductionism in biology.[52] Despite their academic disagreements, Dawkins and Gould did not have a hostile personal relationship, and Dawkins dedicated a large portion of his 2003 book A Devil's Chaplain posthumously to Gould, who had died the previous year.

Dawkins believes - in light of the complex logic on display in the genetic code - it is entirely possible that life on earth was seeded by an alien life-form, implying the reluctance to accept the standard Darwinian line that life boot-strapped its way out of the primordial soup[53].

Dawkins's book The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution expounds the evidence for biological evolution,[54] and coincided with Darwin's bicentennial year.[55]

Meme

Dawkins coined the word meme (the behavioural equivalent of a gene) as a way to encourage readers to think about how Darwinian principles might be extended beyond the realm of genes.[56] Indeed, it was intended as an extension of his "replicators" argument, but it took on a life of its own in the hands of other authors such as Daniel Dennett and Susan Blackmore. These popularisations then led to the emergence of memetics, a field from which Dawkins has distanced himself.[57]

Dawkins's meme refers to any cultural entity that an observer might consider a replicator of a certain idea or complex of ideas. He hypothesised that people could view many cultural entities as capable of such replication, generally through exposure to humans, who have evolved as efficient (although not perfect) copiers of information and behaviour. Because memes are not always copied perfectly, they might become refined, combined, or otherwise modified with other ideas; this results in new memes, which may themselves prove more or less efficient replicators than their predecessors, thus providing a framework for a hypothesis of cultural evolution based on memes, a notion that is analogous to the theory of biological evolution based on genes.[58]

Although Dawkins invented the specific term meme independently, he has not claimed that the idea itself was entirely novel,[59] and there have been other expressions for similar ideas in the past. For instance, John Laurent has suggested that the term may have derived from the work of the little-known German biologist Richard Semon.[60] In 1904, Semon published Die Mneme (which appeared in English in 1924 as The Mneme). This book discusses the cultural transmission of experiences, with insights parallel to those of Dawkins. Laurent also found the term mneme used in Maurice Maeterlinck's The Life of the White Ant (1926), and has highlighted the similarities to Dawkins's concept.[60] Author James Gleick describes Dawkins's concept of the meme as "his most famous memorable invention, far more influential than his selfish genes or his later proselytizing against religiosity".[61]

Criticism of creationism

Dawkins is a prominent critic of creationism (the religious belief that humanity, life, and the universe were created by a deity[62] without recourse to evolution[63]). He has described the Young Earth creationist view that the Earth is only a few thousand years old as "a preposterous, mind-shrinking falsehood",[64] and his 1986 book, The Blind Watchmaker, contains a sustained critique of the argument from design, an important creationist argument. In the book, Dawkins argues against the watchmaker analogy made famous by the 18th-century English theologian William Paley via his book Natural Theology, in which Paley argues that just as a watch is too complicated and too functional to have sprung into existence merely by accident, so too must all living things—with their far greater complexity—be purposefully designed. Dawkins shares the view generally held by scientists that natural selection is sufficient to explain the apparent functionality and non-random complexity of the biological world, and can be said to play the role of watchmaker in nature, albeit as an automatic, nonintelligent, blind watchmaker.[65]

Dawkins at the 34th annual conference of American Atheists, 2008

In 1986, Dawkins and biologist John Maynard Smith participated in an Oxford Union debate against A. E. Wilder-Smith (a Young Earth creationist) and Edgar Andrews (president of the Biblical Creation Society).[b] In general, however, Dawkins has followed the advice of his late colleague Stephen Jay Gould and refused to participate in formal debates with creationists because "what they seek is the oxygen of respectability", and doing so would "give them this oxygen by the mere act of engaging with them at all". He suggests that creationists "don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters is that we give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public."[66]

In a December 2004 interview with American journalist Bill Moyers, Dawkins said that "among the things that science does know, evolution is about as certain as anything we know." When Moyers questioned him on the use of the word theory, Dawkins stated that "evolution has been observed. It's just that it hasn't been observed while it's happening." He added that "it is rather like a detective coming on a murder after the scene... the detective hasn't actually seen the murder take place, of course. But what you do see is a massive clue... Huge quantities of circumstantial evidence. It might as well be spelled out in words of English."[67]

Dawkins has ardently opposed the inclusion of intelligent design in science education, describing it as "not a scientific argument at all, but a religious one".[68] He has been referred to in the media as "Darwin's Rottweiler",[69] a reference to English biologist T. H. Huxley, who was known as "Darwin's Bulldog" for his advocacy of Charles Darwin's evolutionary ideas. He has been a strong critic of the British organisation Truth in Science, which promotes the teaching of creationism in state schools, and he plans through the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science to subsidise schools with the delivery of books, DVDs, and pamphlets that counteract their work, which he has described as "educational scandal".[70]

Advocacy of atheism

Dawkins lecturing on his book The God Delusion, 24 June 2006.

Dawkins is an outspoken atheist and a prominent critic of religion. In an interview with Thomas Bass for a book published in 1994, Dawkins describes himself as a "fairly militant atheist".[71] In 1996, when asked if he would prefer to be known as a scientist or a militant atheist, he replied "Bertrand Russell called himself the Passionate Sceptic. It's aiming high, but I'll shoot for that."[72] Dawkins is an Honorary Associate of the National Secular Society,[73] a vice-president of the British Humanist Association (since 1996),[8] a Distinguished Supporter of the Humanist Society of Scotland,[74] a member of the Secular Coalition for America advisory board,[75] a Humanist Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism,[76] and a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.[77] In 2003, he became a signatory of the humanist manifesto Humanism and Its Aspirations, published by the American Humanist Association.[78] As a result of his advocacy of atheism, Dawkins has sometimes been described as a vocal, militant rationalist,[79][80] and as "the UK's Chief Atheist".[81]

Dawkins believes that understanding evolution led him to atheism[82] and that religion is largely incompatible with science.[83] In his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins writes:

An atheist before Darwin could have said, following Hume: "I have no explanation for complex biological design. All I know is that God isn't a good explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one." I can't help feeling that such a position, though logically sound, would have left one feeling pretty unsatisfied, and that although atheism might have been logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.[84]

In his 1991 essay "Viruses of the Mind" (from which the term faith-sufferer originated), he suggests that memetic theory might analyse and explain the phenomenon of religious belief and some of the common characteristics of religions, such as the belief that punishment awaits non-believers. According to Dawkins, faith—belief that is not based on evidence—is one of the world's great evils. He regards it as analogous to the smallpox virus, though more difficult to eradicate.[85] Dawkins is well known for his contempt for religious extremism,[86] but he has also argued with religious scientists and liberal believers, such as biologists Kenneth Miller[87] and Francis Collins,[88] and theologians Alister McGrath and Richard Harries.[89] Dawkins has stated that his opposition to religion is twofold: Religion is both a source of conflict and a justification for belief without evidence.[90] However, he describes himself as a "cultural Christian",[91] and proposed the slogan "Atheists for Jesus".[92]

Following the 11 September 2001 attacks, when asked how the world might have changed, Dawkins responded:

Many of us saw religion as harmless nonsense. Beliefs might lack all supporting evidence but, we thought, if people needed a crutch for consolation, where's the harm? September 11th changed all that. Revealed faith is not harmless nonsense, it can be lethally dangerous nonsense. Dangerous because it gives people unshakeable confidence in their own righteousness. Dangerous because it gives them false courage to kill themselves, which automatically removes normal barriers to killing others. Dangerous because it teaches enmity to others labelled only by a difference of inherited tradition. And dangerous because we have all bought into a weird respect, which uniquely protects religion from normal criticism. Let's now stop being so damned respectful![93]

Dawkins has especially risen to prominence in contemporary public debates relating science and religion since the publication of his 2006 book The God Delusion, which has achieved greater sales figures worldwide than any of his other works to date. Its success has been seen by many as indicative of a change in the contemporary cultural zeitgeist, central to a recent rise in the popularity of atheistic literature.[94][95] The God Delusion was praised by the Nobel laureates Sir Harold Kroto and James D. Watson and by psychologist Steven Pinker,[96] while criticized by philosopher of biology Michael Ruse,[97] prominent literary critic Terry Eagleton,[98] and journalist Andrew Brown.[99] In the book, Dawkins suggests that atheists should be proud, not apologetic, because atheism is evidence of a healthy, independent mind.[100] He sees education and consciousness-raising as the primary tools in opposing what he considers to be religious dogma and indoctrination.[18][101][102] These tools include the fight against certain stereotypes, and he has adopted the term Bright as a way of associating positive public connotations with those who possess a naturalistic worldview.[102] Dawkins notes that feminists have succeeded in arousing widespread embarrassment at the routine use of "he" instead of "she". Similarly, he suggests, a phrase such as "Catholic child" or "Muslim child" should be considered just as socially absurd as, for instance, "Marxist child"; children should not be classified based on their parents' ideological beliefs.[102] According to Dawkins, there is no such thing as a Christian child or a Muslim child, as children have about as much capacity to make the decision to become Christians or Muslims as they do to become Marxists.[100]

In January 2006, Dawkins presented a two-part television documentary, The Root of All Evil?, addressing what he sees as the malignant influence of religion on society. The title itself is one that Dawkins disliked, noting that religion shouldn't be regarded as the root of all evil.[103] Critics have said that the programme gives too much time to marginal figures and extremists, and that Dawkins's confrontational style does not help his cause and exhibits similarities with the approaches of religious fundamentalists more than with the approaches of the dispassionate, analytic approach of 'hard' science;[104][105] Dawkins has rejected these claims, citing the number of moderate religious broadcasts in everyday media as providing a suitable balance to the extremists in the programmes; he has further remarked that someone who is deemed an "extremist" in a religiously moderate country may well be considered "mainstream" in a religiously conservative one.[106] The unedited recordings of Dawkins's conversations with Alister McGrath and Richard Harries, including material unused in the broadcast version, have been made available online by the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science.[107]

Dawkins's work has been controversial, and a number of authors have criticized it. For example, in London Review of Books, Terry Eagleton refers to Dawkins as "the least well-equipped to understand what he castigates", saying:[108]

Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.

Oxford theologian Alister McGrath (author of The Dawkins Delusion and Dawkins' God) maintains that Dawkins is ignorant of Christian theology and therefore unable to engage religion and faith intelligently.[109] In reply, Dawkins asks: "Do you have to read up on leprechology before disbelieving in leprechauns?"[110] In the paperback edition of The God Delusion, Dawkins invokes the American biologist PZ Myers, who has satirised this line of argument as "The Courtier's Reply".[111] Dawkins had an extended debate with McGrath at the 2007 Sunday Times Literary Festival.[112]

Dawkins argues that "the existence of God is a scientific hypothesis like any other".[113] He disagrees with Stephen Jay Gould's principle of nonoverlapping magisteria. In an interview with Time magazine, Dawkins says:

I think that Gould's separate compartments was a purely political ploy to win middle-of-the-road religious people to the science camp. But it's a very empty idea. There are plenty of places where religion does not keep off the scientific turf. Any belief in miracles is flat contradictory not just to the facts of science but to the spirit of science.[114]

Astrophysicist Martin Rees, who has described himself as an unbeliever who identifies with Christianity from a cultural perspective, has suggested that Dawkins's attack on mainstream religion is unhelpful.[115] Regarding Rees's claim in his book Our Cosmic Habitat that "such questions lie beyond science; however, they are the province of philosophers and theologians", Dawkins asks "what expertise can theologians bring to deep cosmological questions that scientists cannot?"[116][117] Elsewhere, Dawkins has written that "there's all the difference in the world between a belief that one is prepared to defend by quoting evidence and logic, and a belief that is supported by nothing more than tradition, authority or revelation."[85] As examples of "good scientists who are sincerely religious", Dawkins names Arthur Peacocke, Russell Stannard, John Polkinghorne, and Francis Collins, but says "I remain baffled ... by their belief in the details of the Christian religion."[118][119][120][121][122] He has said that the publication of The God Delusion is "probably the culmination" of his campaign against religion.[123]

Inspired by the gay rights movement, Dawkins founded the Out Campaign in 2007 to encourage atheists worldwide to declare their stance publicly and proudly;[124] Dawkins hopes that the more atheists identify themselves, the more the public will become aware of just how many people actually hold these views, thereby reducing the negative opinion of atheism among the religious majority.[125][126]

In September 2008, following a complaint by Islamic creationist Adnan Oktar, a court in Turkey blocked access to Dawkins's website richarddawkins.net. The court decision was made due to "insult to personality".[127][128][129][130][131][132] As of 8 July 2011, richarddawkins.net is no longer blocked in Turkey.[133]

Dawkins with Ariane Sherine at the Atheist Bus Campaign launch in London

In October 2008, Dawkins officially supported the UK's first atheist advertising initiative, the Atheist Bus Campaign. Created by Guardian journalist Ariane Sherine and administered by the British Humanist Association, the campaign aimed to raise funds to place atheist advertisements on buses in the London area, and Dawkins pledged to match the amount raised by atheists, up to a maximum of £5,500. However, the campaign was an unprecedented success, raising over £100,000 in its first four days, and generating global press coverage.[134][135] The campaign, started in January 2009, features adverts across the UK with the slogan: "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life." Dawkins said that "this campaign to put alternative slogans on London buses will make people think—and thinking is anathema to religion."[136]

In 2010, Dawkins supported legal efforts to charge Pope Benedict XVI with crimes against humanity. Dawkins and fellow anti-religion campaigner Christopher Hitchens were believed to have explored the option of attempting to have the Pope arrested under the same legal principle that saw Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet arrested during a visit to Britain in 1998.[137]

Dawkins has given support to the idea of a "free thinking" school which he calls "Think for Yourself Academy".[138] The school would not "indoctrinate children in atheism any more than in religion" but it would teach children to "ask for evidence, to be sceptical, critical, open-minded".[139][140]

On 15 September 2010, Dawkins and 54 other public figures signed an open letter published in The Guardian, stating their opposition to Pope Benedict XVI's state visit to the United Kingdom, while acknowledging his right to tour the UK as head of the Roman Catholic Church.[141]

Foundation

In 2006, Dawkins founded the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science (RDFRS), a non-profit organisation. The foundation is in a developmental phase. It has been granted charitable status in the United Kingdom and the United States. RDFRS plans to finance research on the psychology of belief and religion, finance scientific education programs and materials, and publicise and support charitable organisations that are secular in nature. The foundation also offers humanist, rationalist, and scientific materials through its website.[142]

Dawkins has said the "trend toward theocratic thinking in the United States is a danger not only for America but for the entire world."[143] Connected to this concern, Dawkins invited Sean Faircloth to serve as opening speaker on Dawkins's 2011 US book tour. Faircloth is author of the book Attack of the Theocrats, How the Religious Right Harms Us All and What We Can Do About It. The Richard Dawkins Foundation (United States branch) later hired Faircloth, who has ten years experience as a state legislator, as Director of Strategy and Policy.[143]

Other fields

Dawkins speaking at Kepler's Books, Menlo Park, California, 29 October 2006

In his role as professor for public understanding of science, Dawkins has been a critic of pseudoscience and alternative medicine. His 1998 book Unweaving the Rainbow considers John Keats's accusation that by explaining the rainbow, Isaac Newton diminished its beauty; Dawkins argues for the opposite conclusion. He suggests that deep space, the billions of years of life's evolution, and the microscopic workings of biology and heredity contain more beauty and wonder than do "myths" and "pseudoscience".[144] For John Diamond's posthumously published Snake Oil, a book devoted to debunking alternative medicine, Dawkins wrote a foreword in which he asserts that alternative medicine is harmful, if only because it distracts patients from more successful conventional treatments and gives people false hopes.[145] Dawkins states that "there is no alternative medicine. There is only medicine that works and medicine that doesn't work."[146]

Dawkins has expressed concern about the growth of the planet's human population and about the matter of overpopulation.[147] In The Selfish Gene, he briefly mentions population growth, giving the example of Latin America, whose population, at the time the book was written, was doubling every 40 years. He is critical of Roman Catholic attitudes to family planning and population control, stating that leaders who forbid contraception and "express a preference for 'natural' methods of population limitation" will get just such a method in the form of starvation.[148]

As a supporter of the Great Ape Project—a movement to extend certain moral and legal rights to all great apes—Dawkins contributed the article "Gaps in the Mind" to the Great Ape Project book edited by Paola Cavalieri and Peter Singer. In this essay, he criticises contemporary society's moral attitudes as being based on a "discontinuous, speciesist imperative".[149]

Dawkins also regularly comments in newspapers and weblogs on contemporary political questions; his opinions include opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq,[150] the British nuclear deterrent, and the actions of US President George W. Bush.[151] Several such articles were included in A Devil's Chaplain, an anthology of writings about science, religion, and politics. He is also a supporter of the Republic's campaign to replace the British monarchy with a democratically elected president.[152] Dawkins has described himself as a Labour voter in the 1970s[153] and voter for the Liberal Democrats since the party's creation.[154] In 2009, he spoke at the party's conference in opposition to blasphemy laws, alternative medicine, and faith schools. In the UK general election of 2010, Dawkins officially endorsed the Liberal Democrats, in support of their campaign for electoral reform and for their "refusal to pander to 'faith'."[155]

In the 2007 TV documentary The Enemies of Reason,[156] Dawkins discusses what he sees as the dangers of abandoning critical thought and rationale based upon scientific evidence. He specifically cites astrology, spiritualism, dowsing, alternative faiths, alternative medicine, and homoeopathy. He also discusses how the Internet can be used to spread religious hatred and conspiracy theories with scant attention to evidence-based reasoning.

Continuing a long-standing partnership with Channel 4, Dawkins participated in a five-part television series Genius of Britain, along with fellow scientists Stephen Hawking, James Dyson, Paul Nurse, and Jim Al-Khalili. The five-episode series was broadcast in June 2010. The series focuses on major British scientific achievements throughout history.[157]

In a More4 documentary entitled Faith School Menace? and presented by Dawkins, he argues "for us to reconsider the consequences of faith education, which... bamboozles parents, and indoctrinates and divides children."[158][159]

In 1998, Dawkins expressed his appreciation for two books connected with the Sokal affair:

These books are famous for their criticism of postmodernism in US universities (namely in the departments of literary studies, anthropology, and other cultural studies).[160] In the same occasion, Dawkins also criticised Cambridge University for awarding philosopher Jacques Derrida an honorary doctorate.[160]

In 2011, Dawkins joined the professoriate of the New College of the Humanities, a new private university in London established by A. C. Grayling, which is scheduled to open in September 2012.[161]

Awards and recognition

Dawkins receiving the Deschner Prize in Frankfurt, 12 October 2007, from Karlheinz Deschner.

Dawkins was awarded a Doctor of Science by the University of Oxford in 1989. He holds honorary doctorates in science from the University of Huddersfield, University of Westminster, Durham University,[162] the University of Hull, the University of Antwerp, and the University of Oslo,[163] and honorary doctorates from the University of Aberdeen,[164] Open University, the Vrije Universiteit Brussel,[8] and the University of Valencia.[165] He also holds honorary doctorates of letters from the University of St Andrews and the Australian National University (HonLittD, 1996), and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 1997 and the Royal Society in 2001.[8] He is one of the patrons of the Oxford University Scientific Society.

In 1987, Dawkins received a Royal Society of Literature award and a Los Angeles Times Literary Prize for his book, The Blind Watchmaker. In the same year, he received a Sci. Tech Prize for Best Television Documentary Science Programme of the Year for his work on the BBC's Horizon episode, The Blind Watchmaker.[8]

His other awards include the Zoological Society of London's Silver Medal (1989), the Finlay Innovation Award (1990), the Michael Faraday Award (1990), the Nakayama Prize (1994), the American Humanist Association's Humanist of the Year Award (1996), the fifth International Cosmos Prize (1997), the Kistler Prize (2001), the Medal of the Presidency of the Italian Republic (2001), the Bicentennial Kelvin Medal of The Royal Philosophical Society of Glasgow (2002),[8] and the Nierenberg Prize for Science in the Public Interest (2009).[166]

Dawkins topped Prospect magazine's 2004 list of the top 100 public British intellectuals, as decided by the readers, receiving twice as many votes as the runner-up.[167][168] He was short-listed as a candidate in their 2008 follow-up poll.[169] In 2005, the Hamburg-based Alfred Toepfer Foundation awarded him its Shakespeare Prize in recognition of his "concise and accessible presentation of scientific knowledge". He won the Lewis Thomas Prize for Writing about Science for 2006, as well as the Galaxy British Book Awards's Author of the Year Award for 2007.[170] In the same year, he was listed by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2007,[171] and he was ranked 20th in The Daily Telegraph's 2007 list of 100 greatest living geniuses.[172] He was awarded the Deschner Award, named after German anti-clerical author Karlheinz Deschner.[173]

Since 2003, the Atheist Alliance International has awarded a prize during its annual conference, honouring an outstanding atheist whose work has done the most to raise public awareness of atheism during that year; it is known as the Richard Dawkins Award, in honour of Dawkins's own efforts.[174]

In February 2010, Dawkins was named to the Freedom From Religion Foundation's Honorary Board of distinguished achievers.[175]

In 2012, scientists studying fish in Sri Lanka honored Dawkins by creating Dawkinsia as a new genus name (members of this genus were formerly members of the genus Puntius). Explaining the reasoning behind the genus name, lead researcher Rohan Pethiyagoda was quoted as stating that "Richard Dawkins has, through his writings, helped us understand that the universe is far more beautiful and awe-inspiring than any religion has imagined [...] We hope that Dawkinsia will serve as a reminder of the elegance and simplicity of evolution, the only rational explanation there is for the unimaginable diversity of life on Earth."[176]

Media

Selected publications

Documentary films

Other appearances

Notes

a. ^ W. D. Hamilton hugely influenced Dawkins and the influence can be seen throughout Dawkins's book The Selfish Gene.[18] They became friends at Oxford and following Hamilton's death in 2000, Dawkins wrote his obituary and organised a secular memorial service.[179]

b. ^ The debate ended with the motion "That the doctrine of creation is more valid than the theory of evolution" being defeated by 198 votes to 115.[180][181]

References

  1. ^ Ridley, Mark (2007). Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think : Reflections by Scientists, Writers, and Philosophers. Oxford University Press. p. 228. ISBN 0-19-921466-2., Extract of page 228
  2. ^ Emeritus and Honorary Fellows of New College, Oxford
  3. ^ "Previous holders of The Simonyi Professorship". The University of Oxford. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
  4. ^ "European Evolutionary Biologists Rally Behind Richard Dawkins's Extended Phenotype". Sciencedaily.com. 20 January 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  5. ^ "Richard Dawkins on militant atheism". TED Conferences, LLC. Retrieved 14 December 2011.
  6. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Transworld Publishers. p. 5. ISBN 0-593-05548-9.
  7. ^ "The God Delusion – back on the Times extended list at #24". Richard Dawkins at RichardDawkins.net. 27 January 2010. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Curriculum vitae of Richard Dawkins". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 23 April 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)[dead link] Cite error: The named reference "cv" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  9. ^ a b Dawkins, Richard (11 December 2010). "Lives Remembered: John Dawkins". The Independent. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  10. ^ a b c d Hattenstone, Simon (10 February 2003). "Darwin's child". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 22 April 2008.
  11. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2004-10). [[The Ancestor's Tale]]. p. 317. ISBN 978-0-618-00583-3. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); URL–wikilink conflict (help)
  12. ^ Dawkins, Richard. "Brief Scientific Autobiography". RichardDawkins.net. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  13. ^ "Richard Dawkins: The foibles of faith". BBC News. 12 October 2001. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  14. ^ Pollard, Nick (1995-04). "High Profile". Third Way. 18 (3). Harrow, England: 15. ISSN 0309-3492. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  15. ^ "The Oundle Lecture Series". Oundle School. 2012b. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  16. ^ Schrage, Michael (1995). "Revolutionary Evolutionist". Wired. Retrieved 21 April 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  17. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1969). "A threshold model of choice behaviour". Animal Behaviour. 17 (1): 120. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(69)90120-1.
  18. ^ a b c ""Belief" interview". BBC. 5 April 2004. Retrieved 8 April 2008.
  19. ^ Simonyi, Charles (15 May 1995). "Manifesto for the Simonyi Professorship". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 23 April 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ "Internet Archive Wayback Machine". Web.archive.org. 23 April 2008. Retrieved 28 June 2011. {{cite web}}: Cite uses generic title (help)
  21. ^ "The Current Simonyi Professor: Richard Dawkins". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 23 April 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ "Editorial Board". The Skeptics' Society. Retrieved 22 April 2008.
  23. ^ "The Dawkins Prize for Animal Conservation and Welfare". Balliol College, Oxford. 9 November 2007. Archived from the original on 12 September 2007. Retrieved 30 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  24. ^ Martin Beckford and Urmee Khan (24 October 2008). "Harry Potter fails to cast spell over Professor Richard Dawkins". London: The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 1 November 2008.
  25. ^ "Marriage" (PDF). The Times. London. 23 August 1967. p. 8.[dead link]
  26. ^ a b c "Births, Marriages and Deaths, England and Wales 1984–2006". Findmypast.com. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  27. ^ a b McKie, Robin (25 July 2004). "Doctor Zoo". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 17 March 2008.
  28. ^ Simpson, M. J. (2005). Hitchhiker: A Biography of Douglas Adams. Justin, Charles & Co. p. 129. ISBN 1-932112-35-9., Chapter 15, p. 129
  29. ^ Lloyd, Elisabeth Anne (1994). The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00046-6.
  30. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay (1979). "The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. 205 (1161). London: 581–598. doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086. PMID 42062. Retrieved 14 August 2009. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  31. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1999). The Extended Phenotype. Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press. p. 4. ISBN 0-1....
  32. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Transworld Publishers. pp. 169–172. ISBN 0-593-05548-9.
  33. ^ Hamilton, W.D. (1964). "The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7 (1): 1–16, 17–52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4. PMID 5875341.
  34. ^ Trivers, Robert (1971). "The evolution of reciprocal altruism". Quarterly Review of Biology. 46 (1): 35–57. doi:10.1086/406755.
  35. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1979). "Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection" (PDF). Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie. 51: 184–200. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x.[dead link]
  36. ^ Williams, George Ronald (1996). The molecular biology of Gaia. Columbia University Press. p. 178. ISBN 0-231-10512-6., Extract of page 178
  37. ^ Schneider, Stephen Henry (2004). Scientists debate gaia: the next century. MIT Press. p. 72. ISBN 0-262-19498-8., Extract of page 72
  38. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2000). Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 223. ISBN 0-618-05673-4., Extract of page 223
  39. ^ Dover, Gabriel (2000). Dear Mr Darwin. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-7538-1127-8.
  40. ^ Williams, George C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection]. United States: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-02615-7.
  41. ^ Mayr, Ernst (2000). What Evolution Is. Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-04426-3.
  42. ^ Midgley, Mary (1979). "Gene Juggling". Philosophy. Vol. 54, no. 210. pp. 439–458. doi:10.1017/S0031819100063488. Retrieved 18 March 2008.
  43. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1981). "In Defence of Selfish Genes". Philosophy. Vol. 56. pp. 556–573. doi:10.1017/S0031819100050580. Retrieved 17 March 2008.
  44. ^ Midgley, Mary (2000). Science and Poetry. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-27632-2.
  45. ^ The Solitary Self: Darwin and the Selfish Gene Mary Midgley Mcgill Queens Univ Press (September 2010) ISBN 978-1-84465-253-2
  46. ^ Brown, Andrew (1999). The Darwin Wars: How stupid genes became selfish genes. London: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-684-85144-X.
  47. ^ Brown, Andrew (2000). The Darwin Wars: The Scientific Battle for the Soul of Man. London: Touchstone. ISBN 0-684-85145-8.
  48. ^ Brockman, J. (1995). The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-80359-3.
  49. ^ Sterelny, K. (2007). Dawkins vs. Gould: Survival of the Fittest. Cambridge, UK: Icon Books. ISBN 1-84046-780-0. Also ISBN 978-1-84046-780-2
  50. ^ Morris, Richard (2001). The Evolutionists. W. H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-4094-X.
  51. ^ Dawkins, Richard (24 January 1985). "Sociobiology: the debate continues". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 1 May 2008. Retrieved 3 April 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  52. ^ Dennett, Daniel (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. United States: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-80290-2.
  53. ^ Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal By Amarnath Amarasingam, p. 65. Originally mentioned by Dawkins in 2008 film Expelled
  54. ^ "Transworld signs new book from Dawkins". The Bookseller. 15 February 2008. Retrieved 12 January 2009.
  55. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2009). The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. London: Transworld Publishers. pp. xii. ISBN 0-593-06173-X.
  56. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1989). The Selfish Gene (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 11. ISBN 0-19-286092-5.
  57. ^ Burman, J. T. (2012). The misunderstanding of memes: Biography of an unscientific object, 1976–1999. Perspectives on Science, 20(1), 75-104. [1] doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00057 (This is an open access article, made freely available courtesy of MIT Press.)
  58. ^ Kelly, Kevin (1994). Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World. United States: Addison-Wesley. p. 360. ISBN 0-201-48340-8.
  59. ^ Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla. "Memes". Center for the Study of Complex Systems. University of Michigan. Retrieved 14 August 2009.
  60. ^ a b Laurent, John (1999). A Note on the Origin of 'Memes'/'Mnemes'. Vol. 3. Journal of Memetics. pp. 14–19. Retrieved 17 March 2008.
  61. ^ Gleick, James (2011). The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood. Pantheon. p. 269 ISBN 978-0-375-42372-7
  62. ^ Ruse, Michael. "Creationism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford University. Retrieved 9 September 2009. a Creationist is someone who believes in a god who is absolute creator of heaven and earth.
  63. ^ Scott, Eugenie C. "Creationism". Evolution vs. creationism: an introduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-520-26187-7. The term 'creationism' to many people connotes the theological doctrine of special creationism: that God created the universe essentially as we see it today, and that this universe has not changed appreciably since that creation event. Special creationism includes the idea that God created living things in their present forms...
  64. ^ Dawkins, Richard (9 March 2002). "A scientist's view". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  65. ^ Catalano, John. "Book: The Blind Watchmaker". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  66. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2004). A Devil's Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 218. ISBN 0-618-48539-2., Chapter 5, p 218
  67. ^ Moyers, Bill (3 December 2004). "Now with Bill Moyers". Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 29 January 2006.
  68. ^ Dawkins, Richard and Coyne, Jerry (1 September 2005). "One side can be wrong". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 21 December 2006.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  69. ^ Hall, Stephen S. (9 August 2005). "Darwin's Rottweiler". Discover magazine. Retrieved 22 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  70. ^ Swinford, Steven (19 November 2006). "Godless Dawkins challenges schools". London: The Times. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  71. ^ Bass, Thomas A. (1994). Reinventing the future: Conversations with the World's Leading Scientists. Addison Wesley. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-201-62642-1.
  72. ^ "Richard Dawkins: You Ask The Questions Special". Independent (UK). 4 December 2006.
  73. ^ "Our Honorary Associates". National Secular Society. 2005. Retrieved 21 April 2007.
  74. ^ "The HSS Today". The Humanist Society of Scotland. 2007. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  75. ^ "Secular Coalition for America Advisory Board Biography". Secular.org. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  76. ^ "The International Academy Of Humanism — Humanist Laureates". Council for Secular Humanism. Retrieved 7 April 2008.
  77. ^ "The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry — Fellows". The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 15 June 2008. Retrieved 7 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  78. ^ "Humanism and Its Aspirations — Notable Signers". American Humanist Association. Retrieved 9 February 2010.
  79. ^ Kane, Pat (1998). Franklin, Jane (ed.). The politics of risk society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-7456-1925-5. Richard Dawkins, appointed to a chair in 'the public understanding of science' at Oxford and one of the most vocal militant rationalists...
  80. ^ Ralph Levinson, Science Today: Problem Or Crisis?, Routledge, 1997, p. 32. Books.google.com. 1997-01. ISBN 978-0-203-97482-7. Retrieved 2010-04-29. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  81. ^ "Doubtful Dick". The Financial Times. London. 17 September 2010. Retrieved 17 September 2010.
  82. ^ Sheahen, Laura (2005). "The Problem with God: Interview with Richard Dawkins (2)". Beliefnet.com. Retrieved 11 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  83. ^ "Interview with Richard Dawkins". PBS. Retrieved 12 April 2008.
  84. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton. p. 6. ISBN 0-393-31570-3.
  85. ^ a b Dawkins, Richard (January/February 1997). "Is Science a Religion?". American Humanist Association. Retrieved 2008-03-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  86. ^ Dawkins, Richard (15 September 2001). "Religion's misguided missiles". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 13 April 2008.
  87. ^ Hall, Stephen S. (9 August 2005). "Darwin's Rottweiler". Discover magazine. Archived from the original on 4 April 2008. Retrieved 22 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  88. ^ Biema, David Van (5 November 2006). "God Vs. Science". Time. Retrieved 7 April 2008.
  89. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). "The Root of All Evil?". Channel 4. Retrieved 13 April 2008.
  90. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Transworld Publishers. pp. 282–286. ISBN 0-593-05548-9.
  91. ^ "Dawkins: I'm a cultural Christian". BBC News. 10 December 2007. Retrieved 1 March 2008.
  92. ^ Dawkins, Richard (11 April 2006). "Atheists for Jesus". RichardDawkins.net. Archived from the original on 31 March 2008. Retrieved 15 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  93. ^ Dawkins, Richard (11 November 2001). "Has the world changed?". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 29 January 2006.
  94. ^ Odoyo, Peter (16 July 2007). "The Death of Religion And Rise of Atheism in the West". The Nation. Retrieved 15 March 2008.
  95. ^ Burkowitz, Peter (16 July 2007). "The New Atheism". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 15 March 2008.
  96. ^ "The God Delusion — Reviews". RichardDawkins.net. Archived from the original on 2 July 2008. Retrieved 8 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  97. ^ Ruse, Michael (2 November 2009). "Dawkins et al bring us into disrepute". The Guardian.
  98. ^ http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n20/terry-eagleton/lunging-flailing-mispunching
  99. ^ http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/dawkinsthedogmatist/
  100. ^ a b Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. p. 3. ISBN 0-618-68000-4. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  101. ^ Smith, Alexandra (27 November 2006). "Dawkins campaigns to keep God out of classroom". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 15 January 2007.
  102. ^ a b c Dawkins, Richard (21 June 2003). "The future looks bright". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  103. ^ Dawkins (2006: 23)
  104. ^ Jacobson, Howard (21 January 2006). "Nothing like an unimaginative scientist to get non-believers running back to God". London: The Independent. Retrieved 27 March 2007.
  105. ^ Ferguson, Ron (19 January 2006). "What a lazy way to argue against God". The Herald. Archived from the original on 29 January 2008. Retrieved 3 April 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  106. ^ Dawkins, Richard (30 January 2006). "Diary — Richard Dawkins". New Statesman. Retrieved 25 March 2007.
  107. ^ "Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath Root of All Evil? Uncut Interviews". RichardDawkins.net. 31 May 2007. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  108. ^ London Review of books, Vol. 28 No. 20 · 19 October 2006 pages 32-34
  109. ^ McGrath, Alister (2004). Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing. p. 81. ISBN 1-4051-2538-1.
  110. ^ Dawkins, Richard (17 September 2007). "Do you have to read up on leprechology before disbelieving in them?". RichardDawkins.net. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  111. ^ Myers, PZ (24 December 2006). "The Courtier's Reply". Pharyngula. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  112. ^ Cole, Judith (26 March 2007). "Richard Dawkins at The Sunday Times Oxford Literary Festival". The Times. London. Retrieved 4 March 2008. [dead link]
  113. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. p. 50. ISBN 0-618-68000-4.
  114. ^ Van Biema, David (5 November 2006). "God vs. Science (3)". Time. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  115. ^ Jha, Alok (29 May 2007). "Scientists divided over alliance with religion". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 17 March 2008.
  116. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). "When Religion Steps on Science's Turf". Free Inquiry magazine. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  117. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. pp. 55–56. ISBN 0-618-68000-4.
  118. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. p. 99. ISBN 0-618-68000-4.
  119. ^ Crace, John (10 January 2006). "Richard Dawkins: Beyond belief". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  120. ^ Ruse, Michael (2000). "Double-Dealing in Darwin". Beliefnet. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  121. ^ "Belief — radio interview". BBC Radio. 2004. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  122. ^ "The Atheist: interview with Gordy Slack". Salon.com. 28 April 2005. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  123. ^ Bearder, Tim (24 March 2006). "BBC Oxford interview". FT Magazine. Retrieved 25 May 2007.
  124. ^ "The Out Campaign (original announcement)". RichardDawkins.net. 30 July 2007. Archived from the original on 30 April 2008. Retrieved 1 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  125. ^ Chittenden, Maurice (23 December 2007). "Dawkins to preach atheism to US". London: The Sunday Times. Retrieved 1 April 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  126. ^ Dawkins, Richard (24 October 2007). "Richard Dawkins speech at Atheist Alliance International Convention 2007". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. RichardDawkins.net. Retrieved 1 April 2008.
  127. ^ Gledhill, Ruth (19 September 2008). "Dawkins website banned in Turkey". The Times. London. Retrieved 19 September 2008.
  128. ^ Hooper, Rowan (19 September 2008). "Turkey bans evolutionist's website". New Scientist Blogs. Retrieved 20 September 2008.
  129. ^ Butt, Riazat (19 September 2008). "Missing link: creationist campaigner has Richard Dawkins' official website banned in Turkey". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 20 September 2008.
  130. ^ Staff writer (17 September 2008). "Evolutionist Dawkins' Internet Site Banned In Turkey". Bianet. Retrieved 20 September 2008.
  131. ^ Arpa, Yasemin (17 September 2008). "Evrimci yazarın sitesini Adnan Oktar kapattırdı". NTV-MSNBC (in Turkish). Retrieved 20 September 2008.
  132. ^ Ozimek, John (22 September 2008). "The Turkish court bans Dawkins' website". The Register. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
  133. ^ "RD.net no longer banned in Turkey!". The Richard Dawkins Foundation. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
  134. ^ Ariane Sherine (22 October 2008). "All aboard the atheist bus campaign". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 11 December 2008.
  135. ^ Ariane Sherine (23 October 2008). "'Probably' the best atheist bus campaign ever". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 11 December 2008.
  136. ^ Riazat Butt (22 October 2008). "Arriving soon: atheist bus campaign gets off to a flying start". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 11 December 2008.
  137. ^ Marc Horne (11 April 2010). "'Richard Dawkins calls for arrest of Pope Benedict XVI' by UPDATE 4–12 Marc Horne – TimesOnline". Times Online. Retrieved 11 June 2010. (also on Dawkins's blog)
  138. ^ Powell, Michael (19 September 2011). "A Knack for Bashing Orthodoxy". The New York Times. p. 4. Retrieved 20 September 2011.
  139. ^ Beckford, Martin (24 June 2010). "Richard Dawkins interested in setting up 'atheist free school'". London: Telegraph. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  140. ^ Garner, Richard (29 July 2010). "Gove welcomes atheist schools – Education News, Education". London: The Independent. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  141. ^ "Letters: Harsh judgments on the pope and religion". The Guardian. London. 15 September 2010. Retrieved 16 September 2010. ...the pope, as ... the leader of a religion with many adherents in the UK, is of course free to enter and tour our country. However, as well as a religious leader, the pope is a head of state...
  142. ^ "Our Mission". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Archived from the original on 17 November 2006. Retrieved 17 November 2006. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  143. ^ a b "Sean Faircloth joins RDFRS (US) as Director of Strategy and Policy". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved 1 October 2011.
  144. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1998). Unweaving The Rainbow. United Kingdom: Penguin. pp. 4–7. ISBN 0-618-05673-4.
  145. ^ Diamond, John (2001). Snake Oil and Other Preoccupations. United Kingdom: Vintage. ISBN 0-09-942833-4.
  146. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2003). A Devil's Chaplain. United States: Houghton Mifflin. p. 58. ISBN 0-618-33540-4.
  147. ^ "The Selfish Green". RichardDawkins.net. 2 April 2007. Archived from the original on 1 May 2008. Retrieved 22 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  148. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1989). The Selfish Gene (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 213. ISBN 0-19-286092-5.
  149. ^ edited by Paola Cavalieri and Peter Singer. (1993). The Great Ape Project. United Kingdom: Fourth Estate. ISBN 0-312-11818-X. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  150. ^ Dawkins, Richard (22 March 2003). "Bin Laden's victory". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 15 March 2008.
  151. ^ Dawkins, Richard (18 November 2003). "While we have your attention, Mr President..." London: The Guardian. Retrieved 16 March 2008.
  152. ^ "Our supporters". Republic. 24 April 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
  153. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1989). "Endnotes. Chapter 1. Why are people?". The Selfish Gene (1st extra chapter) (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-286092-5.
  154. ^ "Richard Dawkins: Keep Libel Laws OUT of Science". YouTube. Retrieved 12 December 2009. [dead link]
  155. ^ "Show your support – vote for the Liberal Democrats on May 6th. libdems.org.uk. Monday, 03 May 2010". Libdems.org.uk. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  156. ^ "The Enemies of Reason". Channel 4. 2007. Retrieved 13 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  157. ^ "C4 lines up Genius science series". Broadcast. 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  158. ^ "Faith School Menace? – Faith School Menace?". Channel 4. 18 August 2010. Retrieved 17 September 2010.
  159. ^ Sutcliffe, Tom (19 August 2010). "Last Night's TV: Faith Schools Menace?/More 4 – Reviews, TV & Radio". London: The Independent. Retrieved 17 September 2010.
  160. ^ a b Dawkins, Richard. "Postmodernism Disrobed". Retrieved 24 September 2010.
  161. ^ "New university to rival Oxbridge will charge £18,000 a year". Sunday Telegraph. 5 June 2011
  162. ^ "Durham salutes science, Shakespeare and social inclusion". Durham News & Events Service. 26 August 2005. Retrieved 11 April 2006.
  163. ^ "Æresdoktorer i 2011 - Universitetet i Oslo" (in Template:No icon). Uio.no. Retrieved 22 October 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link) [dead link]
  164. ^ Best-selling biologist and outspoken atheist among those honoured by University, University of Aberdeen.
  165. ^ "Richard Dawkins, doctor 'honoris causa' per la Universitat de València". 31 March 2009. Retrieved 2 April 2009.
  166. ^ Scripps Institution of Oceanography (7 April 2009). "Scripps Institution of Oceanography Honors Evolutionary Biologist, Richard Dawkins, in Public Ceremony and Lecture". Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Retrieved 7 April 2009.
  167. ^ "Q&A: Richard Dawkins". BBC News. 29 July 2004. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  168. ^ Herman, David (2004). "Public Intellectuals Poll". Prospect magazine. Retrieved 9 March 2008. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  169. ^ "The Top 100 Public Intellectuals". Prospect magazine. Retrieved 22 April 2008. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  170. ^ "Galaxy British Book Awards — Winners & Shortlists 2007". Publishing News. 2007. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 21 April 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  171. ^ Behe, Michael (3 May 2007). "Time Top 100". TIME. Retrieved 2 March 2008.
  172. ^ "Top 100 living geniuses". The Daily Telegraph. 28 October 2007. Retrieved 4 October 2010.
  173. ^ Giordano Bruno Stiftung (28 May 2007). "Deschner-Preis an Richard Dawkins". Humanistischer Pressedienst. Retrieved 4 April 2008.
  174. ^ Slack, Gordy (30 April 2005). "The atheist". Salon. Retrieved 3 August 2007.
  175. ^ "Honorary FFRF Board Announced". Retrieved 20 August 2008.
  176. ^ "Sri Lankans name new fish genus after atheist Dawkins". Google News. Agence France-Presse. 15 July 2012. Retrieved 16 July 2012.
  177. ^ ""The Magic of Reality - new book by Richard Dawkins this Fall" 10 May 2011". Richarddawkins.net. 10 May 2011. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  178. ^ Staff. "BBC Educational and Documentary: Blind Watchmaker". BBC. Retrieved 2 December 2008. [dead link]
  179. ^ Dawkins, Richard (3 October 2000). "Obituary by Richard Dawkins". The Independent. Archived from the original on 18 March 2008. Retrieved 22 March 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  180. ^ Critical-Historical Perspective on the Argument about Evolution and Creation, John Durant, in "From Evolution to Creation: A European Perspective (Eds. Sven Anderson, Arthus Peacocke), Aarhus Univ. Press, Aarhus, Denmark
  181. ^ "1986 Oxford Union Debate: Richard Dawkins, John Maynard Smith". RichardDawkins.net. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 10 May 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help) Debate downloadable as MP3 files.

Template:Wikipedia books

General

Video

Selected writings

Audio

Template:Persondata

Template:Link FA Template:Link GA Template:Link GA Template:Link FA