User talk:Theparties: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Theparties (talk | contribs) |
Theparties (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 221: | Line 221: | ||
==Unblock request== |
==Unblock request== |
||
{{help me-helped}} |
{{help me-helped}} |
||
{{Unblock|1=Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (6th nomination)|list that justified this "ban" has been deleted]] because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The [[User:Elockid|user]] who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also [[User:Elockid/Long-term abuse/23prootie|created a page about me]] that may violate Wikipedia's policies about [[WP:personal information|privacy and personal information]] and that page should be [[WP:Deletion policy|deleted]]. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban Appeals Subcommittee|Ban Appeals Subcommittee]] but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "[[Template:2nd chance|second chance]]" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new. |
{{Unblock|1=(I am putting this [[:Category:Unblock on hold|Unblock on hold]] as I figure out what to do next.)<br><br>Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (6th nomination)|list that justified this "ban" has been deleted]] because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The [[User:Elockid|user]] who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also [[User:Elockid/Long-term abuse/23prootie|created a page about me]] that may violate Wikipedia's policies about [[WP:personal information|privacy and personal information]] and that page should be [[WP:Deletion policy|deleted]]. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban Appeals Subcommittee|Ban Appeals Subcommittee]] but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "[[Template:2nd chance|second chance]]" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new.}} |
||
P.S> I am putting this [[:Category:Unblock on hold|Unblock on hold]] as I figure out what to do next.}} |
|||
: This is a checkuser block and requires either the Arbitration Commitee (through the Ban Appeals Sub Committee) or a checkuser to authorise your unblock. Editors and administrators, other than checkusers, are unable to assist you in this request. You may wish to use the [[WP:UTRS]] system to more quickly make a checkuser aware of your request, however. |
: This is a checkuser block and requires either the Arbitration Commitee (through the Ban Appeals Sub Committee) or a checkuser to authorise your unblock. Editors and administrators, other than checkusers, are unable to assist you in this request. You may wish to use the [[WP:UTRS]] system to more quickly make a checkuser aware of your request, however. |
||
Revision as of 13:02, 12 November 2014
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Theparties. |
| This is Theparties's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1 |
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
|
Hi Theparties! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Wow. Thank you.
DYK for The Magical Delights of Stevie Nicks
 | On 16 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Magical Delights of Stevie Nicks, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the American Horror Story: Coven episode "The Magical Delights of Stevie Nicks" was inspired by rumors about Stevie Nicks and witchcraft? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Magical Delights of Stevie Nicks. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yehey, I'm happy.--Theparties (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 |
 |
Love it. fabulous.--11:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Sasheer Zamata
| On 3 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sasheer Zamata, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sasheer Zamata is the first female black Saturday Night Live cast member hired since the addition of Maya Rudolph? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sasheer Zamata. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from the DYK project and I Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 |
DYK for Imelda (film)
| On 9 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Imelda (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Imelda Marcos (pictured) claimed in the film Imelda that her extravagant clothing "inspired the poor to dress better"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Imelda (film). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for nominating the episode article for DYK! Since it was approved, it became the second most viewed DYK article in January 2014 and was ranked 731 on WPTV's popular pages, which, you'll notice does not include many (if any) episode articles! Thanks again! — Wyliepedia 18:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 |
DYK for Fernanda Lima
| On 16 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fernanda Lima, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Fernanda Lima (pictured), the muse of the 2014 FIFA World Cup, is in a television show named Amor & Sexo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fernanda Lima. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 |
DYK for Orlando Quevedo
| On 22 February 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Orlando Quevedo, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Orlando Quevedo is the first cardinal from Mindanao, Philippines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Orlando Quevedo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Dom Justo Takayama
Nice work on the article. FYI, per the rules, an article may only be featured once per year (there are a few exceptions for holidays and observances), so I removed the article from February 4, leaving it on February 3. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 19:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 |
March 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)- When this current block expires, be aware that you are very likely to be blocked for edit warring if you continue your activities at Philippines. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
I am going to address why I mark all my edits as minor. There is a tendency I have to get into fights with other people and I just don't want that. Marking them minor makes me avoid these. It's not to be rude, no offence.--Theparties (talk) 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, marking all of your edits "minor" does mean fewer people will see them. This is exactly why marking all of your edits as "minor" is not acceptable. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh! I forgot about that one in December. Fine. I'm stopping. You win.--♥ 00:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, marking all of your edits "minor" does mean fewer people will see them. This is exactly why marking all of your edits as "minor" is not acceptable. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Imelda (film)
The article Imelda (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Imelda (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Your new signature
Can you please change your signature so that it contains your username? A heart symbol doesn't really help people in identifying who you are. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 01:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- The new signature works. Thanks, Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 17:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome.--♥(Theparties) 23:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Imelda (film)
The article Imelda (film) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Imelda (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Theparties (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry. It's been a habit so it's quite difficult to undo marking my edits. I check the minor edit to make sure I am logged in (and yeah to avoid conflict). Could you warn me first next time before blocking me? Sorry again. And yeah I agree to stop marking my edits minor. ♥(Theparties) 00:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You received plenty of warning above, leading to your previous block on the same issue. I doubt that you mean it this time regarding marking these edits as minor. SQLQuery me! 04:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Gabriel Yuji (talk), I honestly don't know how to upload an image without any copyright issues. I may be able to fill the rest of the infobox once my block expires. In the meantime, could you find anyone who can do it?--♥(Theparties) 15:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- I can upload it. I found this and this image. Do you have any preference or another image? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- The second one. I went to an error page for the first one.--♥(Theparties) 22:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Does this link work? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- The second one. I went to an error page for the first one.--♥(Theparties) 22:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
_-_Geographicus_-_EastIndies-cary-1801.jpg) |
 |
DYK for Saddle Ridge Hoard
| On 18 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saddle Ridge Hoard, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Saddle Ridge Hoard (pictured) of Gold Country in California is believed to be the biggest hoard of gold coins ever unearthed in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saddle Ridge Hoard. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 |
Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Imelda Marcos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonesey95 -- Jonesey95 (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos
The article Imelda Marcos you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Imelda Marcos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonesey95 -- Jonesey95 (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unblock request
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Theparties (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(I am putting this Unblock on hold as I figure out what to do next.)
Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The list that justified this "ban" has been deleted because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The user who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also created a page about me that may violate Wikipedia's policies about privacy and personal information and that page should be deleted. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "second chance" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new.
Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The list that justified this "ban" has been deleted because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The user who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also created a page about me that may violate Wikipedia's policies about privacy and personal information and that page should be deleted. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "second chance" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=(I am putting this [[:Category:Unblock on hold|Unblock on hold]] as I figure out what to do next.)<br><br>Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (6th nomination)|list that justified this "ban" has been deleted]] because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The [[User:Elockid|user]] who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also [[User:Elockid/Long-term abuse/23prootie|created a page about me]] that may violate Wikipedia's policies about [[WP:personal information|privacy and personal information]] and that page should be [[WP:Deletion policy|deleted]]. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban Appeals Subcommittee|Ban Appeals Subcommittee]] but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "[[Template:2nd chance|second chance]]" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=(I am putting this [[:Category:Unblock on hold|Unblock on hold]] as I figure out what to do next.)<br><br>Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (6th nomination)|list that justified this "ban" has been deleted]] because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The [[User:Elockid|user]] who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also [[User:Elockid/Long-term abuse/23prootie|created a page about me]] that may violate Wikipedia's policies about [[WP:personal information|privacy and personal information]] and that page should be [[WP:Deletion policy|deleted]]. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban Appeals Subcommittee|Ban Appeals Subcommittee]] but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "[[Template:2nd chance|second chance]]" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=(I am putting this [[:Category:Unblock on hold|Unblock on hold]] as I figure out what to do next.)<br><br>Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of banned users (6th nomination)|list that justified this "ban" has been deleted]] because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The [[User:Elockid|user]] who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also [[User:Elockid/Long-term abuse/23prootie|created a page about me]] that may violate Wikipedia's policies about [[WP:personal information|privacy and personal information]] and that page should be [[WP:Deletion policy|deleted]]. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban Appeals Subcommittee|Ban Appeals Subcommittee]] but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "[[Template:2nd chance|second chance]]" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- This is a checkuser block and requires either the Arbitration Commitee (through the Ban Appeals Sub Committee) or a checkuser to authorise your unblock. Editors and administrators, other than checkusers, are unable to assist you in this request. You may wish to use the WP:UTRS system to more quickly make a checkuser aware of your request, however.
- Also, when filing an unblock request, do NOT keep editing it and causing edit conflicts. Nick (talk) 12:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks. I am going to try your suggestion. And sorry for creep-editing. I was trying to cram all the info.-♥(Theparties) 12:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)