User talk:MPJ-DK

Full Disclosure: On June 23, 2016 I made my first paid edit on Wikipedia on behalf of a user on Fiverr. A log of all my paid work can be found can be found here. I am still a full time wrestling nut, but also a part time business man trying to make a living. I will not make any edits I believe are in bad faith, against guideline or the rules of Wikipedia. If I accidentally do please me know. Thank you.

The "No Drama" Professional Wrestling Society (NDPWS) - aka. Just me

By royal decree of the Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown Regent of the order of the "Timeless Triple Crown" and the most charismatic Most Plusquamperfect Looshpah Laureate I do declare that this page be a "No Drama" zone and that the royal regent of nobility (in other words me) shall "let it go" and practice the lost art of "No Drama". Fully recognizing my right to ignore my own decrees as well as your right to call me out on it when I an not being a "No Drama Lama". I am nothing if not incosistant.

Welterweight article

Looks like I tried to correct an apparent spelling mistake but made a spelling mistake in doing so. Since he is referred to as Misterioso elsewhere, should it not be Misterioso instead of Misterio in the note? In the FLC, you also wrote FLa in one place where you seem to mean FLs, but I didn't want to edit your comments. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

NXT TakeOver: Brooklyn Poster

I just thought I'd let you know that user Mostafa Elsherbini has been replacing your original TakeOver: Brooklyn upload with a fan-made version. You can see the image's history page and the changes he's made here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NXT_Brooklyn_Posters.jpg I have reverted it back to your original upload. OldSkool01 (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
		For splitting all the NXT specials off in to their own articles, I award you this. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 04:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Collaboration

Would you like to work together on making List of AAA Mega Champions an FL and perhaps the main article a GA?--WillC 02:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I've been working on a topic of titles that have appeared and been defended in TNA in some big way. Apparently Jarrett defended that belt a few times in TNA so I have to include it in the topic now. I thought all I had left was the NWA World and NWA Tag but I guess not. Seeing as you are the Mexican contributor around here, I figured I'd talk to you about it since you know more on the subject than I do. I can update the table and work on the prose if you'll source it and copyedit me?--WillC 02:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Alright, well I've put the list in a subpage located here so that we can work on it and possibly get a Did you Know out of it depending on how long it takes us to complete it. I'll update the table and everything shortly based on what I've learned in the King of the Mountain Champions FLC.--WillC 03:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I've always left the event names with the year listed to show which event it actually dropped at instead of them all seeming like the same event at a glance. Up to you what you want to do, I'm flexible.--WillC 03:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

The reason I added the templates is just to avoid that issue at FLC.--WillC 03:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm just doing it the same way everytime so anything different is odd to me. Just explaining myself out.--WillC 04:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I just now noticed your message so ignore me removing the tournament bracket. I agree, if you feel there is not enough info to split the articles then lets merge them. Never had a problem with merging them. I just assumed you had split the list off and you wanted to keep it that way. Fine with me either way. As for the NWA Tag, something tells me there is enough information there for two articles. Afterall, it is the NWA World Tag Team Championship and has the issue with WCW, its time in TNA, etc. There is alot of history behind that title going in and out of companies. Defended in the U.S., Mexico, Japan, England, etc. So yes on merge for AAA, I say nay on NWA. I'd rather merge the NWA but something tells me that they should remain separate.--WillC 05:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Article looks pretty good now. I guess we could use the Jarrett fact for a Did you know.--WillC 21:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't know if it qualifies yet either. Most likely won't since we haven't added 5 times the prose. Reads decently to me. I'll look it over again though.--WillC 22:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I was going to move the article to mainspace and merge the articles but then I looked at the title history from AAA. They keep track of defenses. I was wondering if you wanted to include that in the table like with New Japan: IWGP Heavyweight Championship?--WillC 23:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Not exactly sure what you are saying. NJPW promotes the defenses, not sure about AAA. I found a source for the TNA name with a video of Jarrett winning the title posted by TNA with the name in the caption.--WillC 18:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Alright do you want to add that column or me?--WillC 18:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

I'll go ahead and add it later today then.--WillC 17:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

I really don't go by the style guide anymore. I just go by what is good through FL. Not really anyone in the project knows what should be done and what shouldn't and we never have enough discussion on guides that anything important happens. Personally I hate that type of format and the WWE lists are poorly done and old, most likely fail FL. The TNA lists passed FL so that is good to me but I need to update them. I only change format if I'm shown something from the main MoS.--WillC 03:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm going to go ahead and move it to mainspace since I don't see that there is anything left to do.--WillC 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Moved and merged the articles, nominated it for FLC. Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/AAA Mega Championship/archive1, you're credited as well.--WillC 03:51, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

I have yet to really research into whether he defended it or not. I do know he had it with him in TNA and TNA has a tendency to defend other promotions titles as seen with the IWGP belts. I'm not sure whether it will be a Good Topic or a Featured Topic. I have two different topics. You can check out all the ones I've planned at User:Wrestlinglover/Turning Point (2008). It really depends on what happens to each article what will occur. I have the IWGP Third Belt, the NWA Heavyweight, the NWA Tag, and the AAA Mega left. This is because they all appeared in TNA and were promoted. Are they TNA Titles? Not really but were used by TNA. I'm doing something different than the current champions topic that was done with the WWE titles. Instead I'm doing a TNA Championship article that will encompass the current champions, replacing that short list, and give a history for all titles used by TNA in a large way. As far as I can tell the NWA Junior Heavyweight and Women's Title were used by TNA but nothing more than the champions appearing because they were in the NWA. I don't consider them promoted since they were one time appearances. The IWGP and AAA belts were used on tv and used alot.--WillC 05:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Triple Crown

I'm just being nit-picky, but The Fabulous Kangaroos, Al Costello and Abismo Negro all have a bare url i'd like you to get rid of. I'm also not a fan of how half the references in Bobby Eaton don't have parameters like 'website/publisher' or retrieval dates specified, but i'm happy to give you these awards now in the good faith that these issues will be fixed. Otherwise the articles look fine to me, though I'd appreciate it if you gave them a quick look over as well to see if anything needs updating or improving. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

I am pleased to award this Triple Crown to MPJ-DK for excellent additions to wikipedia. Freikorp (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

I, Freikorp award MPJ-DK with this Imperial Triple Crown for great improvements to Wikipedia's professional wrestling articles. Keep up the good work. Freikorp (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Five or more years have passed since your nominations for Bobby Eaton, The Fabulous Kangaroos, Al Costello, Don Kent (wrestler), Abismo Negro and others were promoted, so it's my pleasure to award you this Timeless Triple Crown. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

I am also pleased to award you this Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown for having five DYK nominations, five good articles and five featured articles. Freikorp (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

GA review of Richie Benaud article

Many thanks for your GA review of the Richie Benaud article. I think your most telling point is "this is supposed to be a Good Article, not a Good Cricket Article", which puts the whole thing in perspective. I think some of us with a special interest in a certain subject get used to certain phrases and uses of terminology and it is very helpful for people, not so steeped in the traditions, to point them out.

I've started fixing some of the issues you've raised and will certaily aim to work on the others. Again, many thanks. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the follow-up note. I'll keep working on it when I can. Perry Middlemiss (talk)

Peer review of Chief Secretary, Singapore

Hello, I addressed all your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Chief Secretary, Singapore/archive1. Anyway, thank you for taking the time to review this article! Mr Huang (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of El Hijo de Dos Caras

Hello! Your submission of El Hijo de Dos Caras at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for El Hijo de Dos Caras

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

AAA Mega Championship

Looks like the above may pass FL with 2 supports but I've been wrong before. There is a deadlink in the article now. Could you find a replacement for it?--WillC 08:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

It has been promoted to FL.--WillC 21:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Richie Benaud/GA1

MPJ-DK, the nominator requested back on November 26 that your review of the nomination be closed since it isn't feasible for him to do the necessary work until next year. Please take care of this as soon as possible. If you aren't able to do so within a week of the request, I'll be happy to close it for you. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I have just now closed the nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft-class project tags

Why are you removing project tags from draft articles? Draft-class exists for a reason. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Smoky Mountain Wrestling

Ive withdrawn the AFD for this article based on your finding reliable sources and defer to your expertise here. What looked like blogs without editorial control may be more reliable than I'm used to seeing in this area. I look forward to your inclusion of those in the article so that future deletion discussion can be avoided.--RadioFan (talk) 19:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Sean Royal#Another Sean Royal

The first couple of sentences of this section are a mess. Please rewrite and clarify. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 04:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Sean Royal Good job! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK and plot summaries

MPJ-DK, I wanted to point you to WP:DYKSG#D2, which talks about DYK's standards for inline source citations, including plot summaries. As you can see, plot summaries are an exception to the source citation requirements. This is the basis of my recent comment on the Episode 7202 review. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for adjusting the review. The only problem is that the review template and its summary icon is located at the top, before the ? icon I had to use when pulling back the nomination from prep, and it needs to remain there for the review chronology to make any sense. What you'll need to do is add another comment at the bottom, with the tick icon, indicating there that after further review, the nomination passes. The final icon on the nomination page is the one that holds sway, and my intermediate one needs to stay where it is. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

RE:Halloween Havoc

Please explain how it can be detrimental, I don't understand. Rewind Wrestling (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MPJ-DK. You have new messages at Talk:Royal Stag/GA1.
Message added 16:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Human3015^{Let It Go}  16:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Heavyweight Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CMLL World Heavyweight Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Heavyweight Championship

The article CMLL World Heavyweight Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:CMLL World Heavyweight Championship for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 17:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Heavyweight Championship

The article CMLL World Heavyweight Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CMLL World Heavyweight Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

NWA Championship

I saw your edits on the NWA title. Are you preparing to expand that? Cause if you are, can I help? I was originally going to work on it but I just haven't continued. I have it in a subpage but not made much progress.--WillC 23:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

yeah I'm in the Cup too. I need to get on that but I have yet too. Was wondering. I may be taking it to FL soon along with the tag belt. I'm still working on that title topic and those are the only ones left.--WillC 01:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Sean Royal

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Light Heavyweight Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CMLL World Light Heavyweight Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Light Heavyweight Championship

The article CMLL World Light Heavyweight Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CMLL World Light Heavyweight Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Guerra de Titanes 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Guerra de Titanes 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for National Wrestling Association

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

CMLL World Heavyweight Championship

Hi there! I wrote the article Briarcliff Farms, and submitted it to FAC, where it didn't receive enough attention in time. I recently renominated it, and would really like if you could make comments. In turn, I'd like to review your FAC, in a quid pro quo manner. Thanks so much. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 01:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

I want to make sure you know, I already replied at the Briarcliff Farms review, and wrote a review of the CMLL page, although I'm not going to focus on prose yet; I'll wait for you to finish with the other guy first. Thanks! ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 00:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK for El Protector (2016)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MPJ-DK. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ranji Trophy triple centuries/archive1.
Message added 14:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for the review! Bharatiya29 14:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Howard Shane

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of Adam Cuerden’s several quality restorations during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by MPJ-DK (submissions), Hurricanehink (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), and Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 1

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 1 Greetings, all. The 3rd Annual GA Cup has officially begun, and you can start reviewing your articles/reassessments now! However, sign-ups will not close til March 15th if anybody (who wishes to sign up) has not signed up yet. We currently have 1 group of 33 contestants in Round 1, and we will have 16 Wikipedians left in Round 2. Please be sure to review this information and the FAQ if you haven't already, If you have any questions, please ask us here where all of the judges (including our newest one, Zwerg Nase!) will be answering any questions you may have. You can also feel free to ask us on our talk pages/send an email to us (information is here). Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)

Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that Cas Liber (submissions) claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Trios Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mexican National Trios Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 16:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Trios Championship

The article Mexican National Trios Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mexican National Trios Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 09:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

User Page

Hey there
Fixed a link for you on your user page. Be sure to check it out.
F4d3d123 (talk) 22:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Using Earwig's Copyvio Detector

MPJ-DK, I noticed in your Jaqeli reviews you've been basing your decision as to whether a GA nomination has copyvio issues on the percentage and characterization (e.g., "Highly unlikely") returned by the tool. My experience of the tool is that its percentages and likelihood claims need to be taken with a great deal of skepticism. Indeed, there was a period where it was removed from the DYK toolbox because of far too many false negatives, and it still gives quite a few.

I have found clear copyvios of two sentences when the tool returned a 9.1% chance of a copyvio, and more than once. The tool also doesn't check for overly close paraphrasing (plagiarism)—it isn't capable of it—yet that's as often a problem as exact copying is. More important than the tool is your own judgment: when you check a paragraph against its source to be sure the article accurately represents the facts in the source, also make sure that the wording isn't copied or otherwise has strong similarities.

Please let me know if you have any questions. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

Hi, since you appear to be interested in GA/FA topics, I'm leaving a quick note about a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history (WWII content: Otto Kittel, other GA/FA articles) that touches on that several of them. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Ray Candy at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Michael Chopra

Hi, I have addressed all the issues. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 18:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Nea Salamis Review

Hello. Thanks again for the review on Talk:Nea Salamis Famagusta/GA3. I was too busy last week to make improvements. Today, I have made some changes based on your comments. I would like your help so the article would meet the GA criteria, before to apply for GA again. Pls read again your comments and tell me what else I have to do. Take your time, when ever you can. I will not apply for GA again if you don't tell me that the article is in a form that can be a GA article. Xaris333 (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Yohei Komatsu

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Sho Tanaka

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

GA review of Quarrington, Lincolnshire

Hi. Thank you for taking this on. I shall wait for you to review a bit more of the content before making changes, but look forward to working with you. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 10:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC).

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this—it's most appreciated. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC).

christian

Hi, DK. Can you help me? Marstino still doing his edition in Christian Cage's article. I'm near to the 3RR, so I can't put the retirement date again. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MPJ-DK. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Santosky v. Kramer.
Message added 15:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An alt hook has been suggested at the nomination page, for which a review is needed. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

FLC review request

Hi. Hope you're well. I also have an FLC up, and I was wondering if you could leave some comments on how to improve it? Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Selma (film)/archive1, List of accolades received by Selma (film). Cowlibob (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MPJ-DK. You have new messages at Talk:Love Me Like You/GA1.
Message added 21:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

It's been nearly a week since I responded.  — Calvin999 21:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup

Dear MPJ-DK, I am sorry that we had to revoke some of the points you received. Please know that your work is nevertheless very much appreciated. Keep it up! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Murciélago Velázquez

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Leroy Brown (wrestler)

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Mohanlal filmography

Hai, I have put this for FLC. Can you spare some time to take a look at it.--Inside the Valley (talk) 12:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA review

Hi. I did not want to say anything to you during the review process, not wanting to appear to influence you, but... wow, what a review. My GA nom languished there for months (most likely due to the article's length), and you did a superb job of evaluating it. A monumental feat, in my opinion. I shy away from such daunting tasks, but you dove right in. And your comments were spot on. The article is much better from your input, and I am proud of my part in bringing it to GA status. This isn't my first GA, but it is my most ambitious. Again, thank you so much. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks much

Thanks much for your GA Review, you've raised some wise recommendations.

I've implemented them directly in the article, and updated back at Talk:The Land of Gorch/GA2.

Thanks again,

— Cirt (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 2

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 1 Greetings, GA Cup competitors! Wednesday saw the end of Round 1. Sainsf took out Round 1 with an amazing score of 765. In second place, MPJ-DK earned an astounding 742 points, and in third place, FunkMonk received 610 points. In Round 1, 206 reviews were completed, more than any other year! At the beginning of March, there were 595 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 1, there were 490. We continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 2 so we can lower the backlog as much as possible. To qualify for the second round, you needed to make it into the top 16 of participants. Users were placed in 4 random pools of 4. To qualify for Round 3, the top 2 in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 9th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 2 will start on April 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on April 28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here Also, remember that a major rule change will go into effect starting on April 1, which marks the beginning of Round Two. Round 1 had an issue brought up in the rules, which we are correcting with this clarification. We believe that this change will make the competition more inherently fair. The new rule is: All reviews must give the nominator (or anyone else willing to improve the article) time to address the issues at hand, even if the article would qualify for what is usually called a "quick fail" in GA terms. To avoid further confusion, we have updated the scoring page, replacing the term "quick fail" with the term "fail without granting time for improvements". We expect all reviewers to put a review on hold for seven days in cases such as these as well, in order to apply the same standards to every competitor. The judges will strictly enforce this new rule. Good luck and have fun! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Ray Candy

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

The default in Argentina

The legislators celebrated when Rodríguez Saá declared the default because of a huge misconception that exists in the country, both back then and still nowadays. The external debt has been a grave financial problem for Argentina since a long time ago. Many people like to think that the debt is something that the evil imperialism imposed to Argentina, and that refusing to pay it would be an inconsequential action. This idea is encouraged by populist leaders and left-wing troublemakers, and it sticks because of the low literacy of the people, which makes them easy prey for the deceptions of those politicians. The fact is that Argentina requested financial aids, wasted them and then has to pay for them, and that refusing to pay it generates very grave problems, but putting the blame on foreign people and supporting "magical" solutions is always easier and more appealing. In particular, those legislators thought that by declaring default Argentina was saving all the money that would be payed, and that the money would be available to be used for something else (yes, a weird and faulty logic, but that was basically the logic behind the cheerings).

As you can see, this explanation was a bit off-topic in Talk:Adolfo Rodríguez Saá/GA1, which should be focused on the article and the GA nomination. Cambalachero (talk) 16:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Gran Alternativa 2012

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA review of Euonymeia

Thanks for the great work you did on the GA review on Euonymeia. Given the complexity of Greek-script sources, this was no easy task! Thank you for all the editing of the text as well, great suggestions. I’ve implemented and addressed the points you raised as outlined in the Revision section of the talk page Talk:Euonymeia#Revisions. I think it’s ready for you to proceed with further assessment. Either way this goes, the article has benefitted much. Thank you!! alx_bio 22:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Cheers! Euonymeia seems to have been accepted as a GA. I'm sure the people over there will be pretty happy and proud of their neighborhood. Oddly enough though, a bot updated my talk page indicating that the nomination has failed User_talk:Alx_bio. Any idea what the mix up is? Thanks again! alx_bio 00:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Gran Alternativa 2011

On 7 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gran Alternativa 2011, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after he won the 2011 Gran Alternativa with Último Guerrero, wrestler Escorpión anointed himself King? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gran Alternativa 2011. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Rockets review

Can you continue with your GA review of Houston Rockets? Not only I worked a bit on it, but I also reviewed your FLC (kno how a good WikiCup performance is enjoyable; too bad my writer's block has taken me down early two years in a row!). igordebraga ≠ 01:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Rebelión de los Juniors (2016)

On 8 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rebelión de los Juniors (2016), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by winning the 2016 Rebelión de los Juniors tournament, professional wrestler Danny Casas earned a match for the IWRG Junior de Juniors Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rebelión de los Juniors (2016). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Precious

professional wresting without drama

Thank you for quality articles about professional wresting and its people such as The Fabulous Kangaroos, for featured lists such as Mexican National Welterweight Championship, for substantial GA reviews including heavyweight, for "I am nothing if not inconsistent.", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar

If I'm not mistaken, the reviewer is part of the team as well, lest we forget! So I am just so delighted to send you a very well deserved Teamwork barnstar for the exciting springboard and kind help you provided in achieving GA status for Michael Laucke. My goal was really to make the article the best it could be, and of course your input was not only immensely helpful but simply indispensable. ...and the GA status is nice too :) ... ...excited about the possibility of the next article creation. ...Time to celebrate with a nice croissant, as we French are wont to do . Besides the hard work, it really was a pleasure all around. My warmest (...havent forgot your roots either), heartfelt thanks for your fantastic work here, truly appreciated, to be sure. Natalie.Desautels (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship was just promoted to FL. Congratulations! ツ FrB.TG (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Oh and your comments at Gaga FLC were quite helpful. I think we all should get out of our comfort zone. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Olly Murs/archive1

Could I bring your attention back to this FLC of mine please. Despite contributions from three editors, the FLC does not have any votes yet. Could I ask you to go through my responses and cast your vote please. Thank you. 16:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Arena México 60th Anniversary Show

Hello! Your submission of Arena México 60th Anniversary Show at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your diligence!

Thank you, MPJ-DK, for your rigorous review of Cross-country skiing (sport) in regard to its candidacy for GA status. Your diligence is exemplary and is central to Wikipedia's steady progress to improve readers' confidence in the encyclopedia. With my admiration and best wishes, User:HopsonRoad 02:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Arena México 60th Anniversary Show

On 15 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arena México 60th Anniversary Show, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Arena México 60th Anniversary Show celebrates the completion of Arena México in 1956, the largest venue ever built specifically for professional wrestling? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arena México 60th Anniversary Show. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arena México 60th Anniversary Show), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Los Espantos

On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Los Espantos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Los Espantos), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Espanto I

On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Espanto I, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Espanto I), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Espanto II

On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Espanto II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Espanto II), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Espanto III

On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Espanto III, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Espanto III), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Espanto IV and V

On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Espanto IV and V, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Espanto IV and V), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Los Hijos del Espanto

On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Los Hijos del Espanto, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Los Hijos del Espanto), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Espantito

On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Espantito, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Espantito), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Trios Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CMLL World Trios Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Middleweight Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CMLL World Middleweight Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Tag Team Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CMLL World Tag Team Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Welterweight Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CMLL World Welterweight Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Tag Team Championship

The article CMLL World Tag Team Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CMLL World Tag Team Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Trios Championship

The article CMLL World Trios Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CMLL World Trios Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Middleweight Championship

The article CMLL World Middleweight Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CMLL World Middleweight Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Welterweight Championship

The article CMLL World Welterweight Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CMLL World Welterweight Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Espectro I

On 29 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Espectro I, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mexico City wrestling commission banned Espectro I from using a casket as part of his entrance ritual? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Espectro I. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Espectro I), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 3

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! Thursday saw the end of Round 2. Sainsf once again took out Round 2 with an amazing score of 996 (a higher score then he received in Round 1!). In second place, MPJ-DK earned an astounding 541 points, and in third place, Carbrera received 419 points. In Round 2, 142 reviews were completed! At the beginning of April, there were 486 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 1, there were 384. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [1]; at the end of Round 2, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months.[2] It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 3 so we can keep lowering the backlog as much as possible. To qualify for the third round, contestants had to earn the two highest scores in each of the four pools in Round 2; plus, one wildcard. We had an unusual occurrence happen in Round 2: because only one contestant submitted reviews in one pool, we selected the contestant with the next highest score to move forward to Round 3. (There will be a rule change for future competitions in case something like this happens again.) For Round 3, users were placed in 3 random pools of 3. To qualify for the Final of the 3rd Annual GA Cup, the top user in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 4th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 3 will start on May 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on May 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here. Good luck and have fun! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 May newsletter

FP of Christ Church Cathedral, Falkland Islands by Godot13

Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.

Round 2 saw three FAs (two by Cas Liber (submissions) and one by Montanabw (submissions)), four Featured Lists (with three by Calvin999 (submissions)), and 53 Good Articles (six by Worm That Turned (submissions) and five each by Hurricanehink (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions), and MPJ-DK (submissions)). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by Adam Cuerden (submissions) and five by Godot13 (submissions)). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) scored 265 base points, while The C of E (submissions) and MPJ-DK (submissions) each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with MPJ-DK (submissions) completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and Cas Liber (submissions), broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for WWE Road to WrestleMania X8

On 6 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WWE Road to WrestleMania X8, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that of all the wrestlers in the video game WWE Road to WrestleMania X8, only Kevin Nash did not actually compete at WrestleMania X8? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WWE Road to WrestleMania X8. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, WWE Road to WrestleMania X8), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Negro Casas

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Negro Casas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mephisto (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mephisto (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Volador Jr.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Volador Jr. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Máscara Dorada

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Máscara Dorada you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of La Sombra (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article La Sombra (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Negro Casas

The article Negro Casas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Negro Casas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mephisto (wrestler)

The article Mephisto (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mephisto (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Volador Jr.

The article Volador Jr. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Volador Jr. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Máscara Dorada

The article Máscara Dorada you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Máscara Dorada for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of La Sombra (wrestler)

The article La Sombra (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:La Sombra (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Guerra del Golfo (2016)

On 9 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guerra del Golfo (2016), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after losing a steel cage match in the main event of the 2016 Guerra de Golfo, professional wrestler Astro was forced to take off his mask? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guerra del Golfo (2016). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Guerra del Golfo (2016)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup-Round 3 Clarification

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! It has been brought to our attention that we made a mistake in the last newsletter. In the last newsletter, we said that the "4th place" overall would make the Final along with the top user from each pool. However, the users who will advance will be the top user from each pool along with "4th and 5th place" overall. We apologize for any inconvenience or confusion that we caused. Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Gran Alternativa 2016

On 10 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gran Alternativa 2016, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2016 Gran Alternativa wrestling tournament marked the Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre debut of Golden Magic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gran Alternativa 2016. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gran Alternativa 2016), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of CMLL Torneo Nacional de Parejas Increibles (2016)

Hello! Your submission of CMLL Torneo Nacional de Parejas Increibles (2016) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 22:49, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Apuestas

Hi. What was the result of the lucha de apuestas discussion? Articles like Barrett, sheamus, cena or ziggler looks really bad. Mask/Hair? Maybe titles included? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 23:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

In that case, I'll clean up WWE articles like ziggler, sheamus, cena and barrett. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

I left Career and Titles as Lucha de Apuestas. Superluchas called Jericho vs Mysterio Mask vs Title a Lucha de Apuestas. [3] --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for CMLL Torneo Nacional de Parejas Increíbles (2016)

On 12 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article CMLL Torneo Nacional de Parejas Increíbles (2016), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that less than two months after Rush kicked Marco Corleone out of Los Ingobernables, the two wrestlers were teamed up for the 2016 Torneo Nacional de Parejas Increíbles? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, CMLL Torneo Nacional de Parejas Increíbles (2016)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Tunisian Arabic

The final version of the work has appeared. I invite you to review it. --Csisc (talk) 14:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Full Impact Pro

On 24 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Full Impact Pro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Full Impact Pro World Heavyweight Championship changed hands during their tour of China? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Full Impact Pro. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Full Impact Pro), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Finals

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! Tuesday saw the end of Round 3. Sainsf, for the third time, won with a sizable 487 points and a shocking 29 articles reviewed. In second, MPJ-DK had 168 points and 7 reviewed articles. In second place, MPJ-DK earned 168 points with just 7 articles, and in third place, Carbrera received 137 points with just 9 articles. Our two wildcard slots went to J Milburn with 122 points and Sturmvogel 66 with 101 points. In Round 3, 65 reviews were completed! At the beginning of the GA Cup, there were 595 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 3, there were 394. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of the GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [4]; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months [5]—nothing before 2016. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Finals for the GA Cup so that are successes continue. To qualify for the Finals, contestants had to earn the highest scores in each of the three pools in Round 3; plus, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users in all of the pools. For the Finals, users were placed in one pool of the remaining five users. To win the GA Cup, you must have the most points. The Finals started on June 1 at 0:00:01 UTC' and end on June 30 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about the Finals and the pools can be found here. A clarification: in order for the points to count, you must mark your reviews as completed; it's not up to the judges to ensure that all reviews are completed by the end of a round. We wish all the contestants the best of luck! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Promo Azteca

Hi. I was told you might be able to help with a lucha libre article I submitted to WP:AFC (Draft:Promo Azteca). I'm interested in improving it to a B or GA-status, or possibly nominating it as a DYK article, and was hoping your project might be able to give me some feedback (assuming it's approved). Thanks. 72.74.202.198 (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with the article. I've been searching for more sources using Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources but haven't found much so far. Would any of these Spanish-language pages be considered reliable sources?

• [6]
• [7]
• [8]
• [9]

I also wrote a separate list for Promo Azteca alumni when it got too big for the original article. I submitted it to WP:AFC (Draft:List of Promo Azteca alumni) but I'm not sure if it's formatted correctly. I borrowed bits and pieces from various pro wrestling lists so please let me know if there's anything else I should do. 72.74.202.198 (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espantito

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espantito you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 02:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Promo Azteca

Hi, when moving the Promo Azteca draft from Draft: to mainspace, you forgot to remove the AfC template. I checked the history of it and you left a summary saying you couldn't find the button. It was located at the very bottom of the page. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikicup review rules

Hey, could you please point me to the wiki cup rules where one need to be a participant in order to add their article/lists to the review needed section? I am unaware of such rules so thought of checking with you with respect to your recent revert. - Vivvt (Talk) 10:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

GA nomination Enrico Alfano

Hi, thanks for reviewing the GA nomination of Enrico Alfano. Unfortunately, I was not able to respond in time. However, I did improve the article according to your review later, and added new information. Maybe you could review it again since you are now familiar with the article. That would be highly appreciated, but it is no obligation of course. DonCalo (talk) 10:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espantito

The article Espantito you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Espantito for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espantito

The article Espantito you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Espantito for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 01:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Yet Another AFC Helper Script

Hi, I noticed when you were reviewing AFC submissions a few days ago and approved one, you wrote in the edit summary you could not find the button mentioned in the documentation. The tool used for submissions is the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which is enabled under gadgets and normally under the more bar when reviewing articles. If you need any more help, you should respond here. In veritas (talk) 04:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto Jr.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espanto Jr. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto Jr. (CMLL)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espanto Jr. (CMLL) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Espantos

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Los Espantos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto II

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espanto II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

@MPJ-DK: I saw your comments on Los Espantos, but will get to those, and more of these reviews tomorrow after some sleep. Just wanted to give you a heads up so you don't wait around thinking I'm still doing more reviews. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 02:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto III

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espanto III you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espanto I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto IV and V

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espanto IV and V you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Hijos del Espanto

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Los Hijos del Espanto you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

La Sombra

Why do you think what I'm dong is vandalism have you actually have seen the Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide there it states everything an wrestling page of a wrestler need to have and if you quickly go and see the in wrestling section there is stated "One reliable source merely mentioning that the wrestler performed the move is not enough", in fact there are not more than just one source for each move and also the sources given are not even reliable they are just book pages and a profile from the Sombra wrestler. So please if you mind why I revert the editions here is my speech about and before you accuse somebody of making vandalism firstly investigate about thank you .TheBellaTwins1445^(talk) 2:26, June 12, 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Espantos

The article Los Espantos you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Los Espantos for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto II

The article Espanto II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Espanto II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto III

The article Espanto III you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Espanto III for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto I

The article Espanto I you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Espanto I for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto Jr.

The article Espanto Jr. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Espanto Jr. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto IV and V

The article Espanto IV and V you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Espanto IV and V for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Hijos del Espanto

The article Los Hijos del Espanto you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Los Hijos del Espanto for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 01:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for CMLL International Gran Prix (2016)

On 20 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article CMLL International Gran Prix (2016), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2016 International Gran Prix wrestling tournament will be the first Gran Prix held by Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre since the 2008 International Gran Prix? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, CMLL International Gran Prix (2016)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for CMLL International Gran Prix (2008)

On 20 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article CMLL International Gran Prix (2008), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2016 International Gran Prix wrestling tournament will be the first Gran Prix held by Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre since the 2008 International Gran Prix? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, CMLL International Gran Prix (2008)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Espanto Jr. (CMLL)

The article Espanto Jr. (CMLL) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Espanto Jr. (CMLL) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Wrap Up

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Final/Wrap-Up Hello to our truly awesome GA Cup competitors! Thursday, June 30 saw the end of the 2016 GA Cup. It was a huge success. In the final, our five competitors reviewed an astonishing 207 articles, the most in any GA Cup final thus far. We continue to reach our goals and make a substantial impact in how quickly articles are reviewed for GA status. On March 1, the start of this competition, the article longest in the queue had languished there since June 26, 2015 [10]; in the July 1, 2016 list, the average wait length is just four months [11]. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for their enthusiasm, and for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success. Remember that most articles can't even be considered for FA status unless it's been passed to GA first, so our efforts have created hundreds of potentials FAs. That is, as they say, a big deal. The final this time represented a real horse race between our 1st and 2nd place winners. First-time competitor (who had won all previous rounds) Sainsf earned an impressive 1456 points with 91 articles reviewed during the final. Close behind, in second place was Carbrera, also a first-time competitor, reviewed the most articles (94). Their enthusiasm was a treat to witness. Congrats to you both! The competition went relatively smoothly, with very little drama this time. We had to clarify one rule: in order for the points to count, you must mark your reviews as completed; it's not up to the judges to ensure that all reviews are completed by the end of a round. We were strict about adhering to this clarification, especially at the end of the final. We intend on stressing it in the stated rules for our next competition, which will be announced soon, so watch out for it. We also intend on applying for a grant through Wikimedia to include gift certificates for our winners, to further incentivize the GA Cup. MrWooHoo should receive special recognition for acting as our main judge, and for stepping in for the rest of the judges when real-life busyness took over. He reviewed the majority of the submissions during our final round. Thanks for your hard work, and for the hard work of all our judges. We look forward to the next competition. Again, thanks to all our competitors, and congrats to our winners. Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arena Naucalpan 37th Anniversary Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imposible (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of El Castillo del Terror (2004) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Castillo del Terror (2004) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Castillo del Terror (2004) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Arena Naucalpan 5th Anniversary Show for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arena Naucalpan 5th Anniversary Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arena Naucalpan 5th Anniversary Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/70 IWRG DYKs at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Boa catshark

MPJ-DK, I was wondering whether you had seen Cwmhiraeth's response to your review? Just so you know: generally, all DYK reviews should be given an icon when posted; as things are fixed, subsequent responses should be given a different icon when appropriate. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Moving DYK nominations to different date

MPJ-DK, I just moved 19 of your nominations from July 1 to July 2: DYK is UTC based as far as dates are concerned, and all of these had articles that were created or expanded starting on July 2. (If you have any multi-article nominations where some articles are from one date and some from another, place it under the earliest date.) I've also been adding "subpage" parameters to the DYKmake templates that don't have them on some of your multi-article nominations, and updating hooks that begin "...that" so they now begin "... that" with the required space. (I haven't gotten them all yet; you'll probably want to make sure they're all fixed.) Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

I should probably also have noted that I think you'll want to limit the number of hooks overall that talk about a wrestler getting his head shaven. Once or twice is surprising and hooky but after that it gets to be old hat unless combined with something else unusual; since these wrestling hooks will probably be running every day or two for a while, the more variety the better. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Arena Naucalpan 22nd and 25th Anniversary Show

Hello! Your submission of Arena Naucalpan 22nd and 25th Anniversary Show at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Arena Naucalpan 36th and 37th Anniversary Show

Hello! Your submission of Arena Naucalpan 36th and 37th Anniversary Show at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/El Castillo del Terror (2000, 2002) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/El Castillo del Terror (2000, 2002)

Thanks for submitting your proposed double DYKs. There are issues. Please take a look and address them. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Arena Naucalpan 29th Anniversary Show

Hello! Your submission of Arena Naucalpan 29th Anniversary Show at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Valenciano (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

AAA

Hi, MPJ. Sorry to bother you. I talk to you and Ribbon about AAA. A friend of mine (a wrestling journalist) told me the oficial name of the promotion is AAA, no Asistencia, Asesoría y Administración since one decade ago (like WWE is no longer World Wrestling Entertainment). Can you confirm that? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MPJ-DK. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Berger Kirche.
Message added 14:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MPJ-DK. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Lothar Zenetti.
Message added 14:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Billie Nipper

You are invited to join the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Billie Nipper. Discussion occurring there about the nomination. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Template:Z48

DYK for IWRG Caravana de Campeones

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article IWRG Caravana de Campeones, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/IWRG Caravana de Campeones. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, IWRG Caravana de Campeones), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (2008)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (2008), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (2008)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (2009)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (2009), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (2009)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (2011)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (2011), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (2011)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (May 2012)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (May 2012), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (May 2012)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (August 2012)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (August 2012), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (August 2012)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (August 2013)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (August 2013), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (August 2013)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (November 2013)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (November 2013), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (November 2013)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (2014)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (2014), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (2014)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Caravana de Campeones (2015)

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caravana de Campeones (2015), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a total of 11 different professional wrestling championships have been defended at the recurring Caravana de Campeones, spread out between shows in 2008, 2009, 2011, May and August 2012, August and November 2013, 2014, and 2015? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caravana de Campeones (2015)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Promo Azteca alumni

Hi MPJ-DK. Draft:List of Promo Azteca alumni was rejected as a "meaningless list" a few days ago. I used other lucha libre rosters and WikiProject Professional wrestling's featured lists as a guide so I'm not sure what I did wrong. Is there anyway to improve the list or am I better off just merging it into the main article? Thanks. 72.74.203.203 (talk) 08:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)