Jump to content

Talk:Pug: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Reverted edits by 50.227.69.146 (talk) to last version by Favonian
→‎Affiliate blog: new section
Line 129: Line 129:
::No it's one of the many dogs I photographed. Sorry, just though this picture was better fitting than the current one. Didn't have a bad thought with it. [[User:Smokerking92|Smokerking92]] ([[User talk:Smokerking92|talk]]) 13:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
::No it's one of the many dogs I photographed. Sorry, just though this picture was better fitting than the current one. Didn't have a bad thought with it. [[User:Smokerking92|Smokerking92]] ([[User talk:Smokerking92|talk]]) 13:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> These are both very nice pictures. But the one titled Sad-pug.jpg is facing a natural and/or artificial light source, and is thus, more illuminated in the dog's facial details. Fawn-pug.png was not taken outside, or was taken in the shade, away from a natural and/or artificial light source. When combined with that dog's darker facial fur, this makes its facial features less distinct. '''<span style="font-size:80%;border:2px solid red;border-radius:50px;font-color:#00008b">[[User:Spintendo|<span style="color:#00008b;font-variant:small-caps">&nbsp;spintendo&nbsp;</span>]]</span>''' 06:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> These are both very nice pictures. But the one titled Sad-pug.jpg is facing a natural and/or artificial light source, and is thus, more illuminated in the dog's facial details. Fawn-pug.png was not taken outside, or was taken in the shade, away from a natural and/or artificial light source. When combined with that dog's darker facial fur, this makes its facial features less distinct. '''<span style="font-size:80%;border:2px solid red;border-radius:50px;font-color:#00008b">[[User:Spintendo|<span style="color:#00008b;font-variant:small-caps">&nbsp;spintendo&nbsp;</span>]]</span>''' 06:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

== Affiliate blog ==

Hi {{u|Kuru}},

I was unable to understand: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pug&diff=925968466&oldid=925967222], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pug&diff=925967222&oldid=925965233] revert. But there are many cites, which are affiliate blogs. EX: PugInformation.org, pugminded.com, OwnedByPugs.com. So we need to remove that also. [[User:Xain36|<span style="font-weight: bold; color: #DC143C;">X</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #000000;">ain36</span>]] '''{'''[[User talk:Xain36|<span style="font-weight: bold; color: #000000;">talk</span>]]'''}''' 12:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:36, 15 November 2019

Template:Vital article

Good articlePug has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 3, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 4, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 18, 2010Good article nomineeListed
September 30, 2012Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 9, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

New picture

A Pug with a brindle coat

This dog looks like it levitates, don't understand it. Crisco 1492 - how does this work? Hafspajen (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Anyway, I just checked the standard and brindle is not accepted, so we can't use it. But thanks anyway. Hafspajen (talk) 01:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2015

Hello, I have found the Chinese name for the Pug, which is 巴哥犬 (Bā gē quǎn), and I was wondering if I could add it to the page please. Jgc145c (talk) 12:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Thank you very much, JGC, 7/3/15, 7:54 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. A quick Google search concurs with the translations. Done, thanks! ‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This has zero relevance for a breed of dog that was imported some 500 years ago. The Chinese term is also clearly a phonetic borrowing of the English term. This is about as interesting as giving the Chinese term for oranges. Or the Mayan term for Chihuahuas
Peter Isotalo 23:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Pug. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move on page pugs

Please see Talk:Pugs#Requested_move_22_February_2017 Olidog (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2018

File:Sad-pug.jpg

to:

File:Fawn-pug.png Smokerking92 (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? ~ GB fan 19:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: The pug in the current does not have good eyes. Its correct, that pug eyes should be large but they are simply to large. They almost look like they are falling out. Another reason would be, that this pug does not have a nose at all. It is just to flat. This is how pugs used to be in the 90s. Good pug breeder are now trying to develop their noses back. And I dont want to talk bad about the current pug, he is still super adorable, but I believe there are better choices for a picture showing how a healthy pug looks like. Smokerking92 (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would that happen to be, your dog ? - FlightTime (open channel) 16:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No it's one of the many dogs I photographed. Sorry, just though this picture was better fitting than the current one. Didn't have a bad thought with it. Smokerking92 (talk) 13:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now: These are both very nice pictures. But the one titled Sad-pug.jpg is facing a natural and/or artificial light source, and is thus, more illuminated in the dog's facial details. Fawn-pug.png was not taken outside, or was taken in the shade, away from a natural and/or artificial light source. When combined with that dog's darker facial fur, this makes its facial features less distinct.  spintendo  06:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliate blog

Hi Kuru,

I was unable to understand: [1], [2] revert. But there are many cites, which are affiliate blogs. EX: PugInformation.org, pugminded.com, OwnedByPugs.com. So we need to remove that also. Xain36 {talk} 12:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pug&oldid=926297909"