User talk:Johnleemk
Did you know?
|
On 27 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Madhavan Nair & Anor. v. Public Prosecutor, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 13:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
DYK!
|
|
On 27 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article C. C. Too, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thank you for your contributions! Nishkid64 21:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Coca Cola
On 5 July 2004. you added a section to the Coca Cola article about Coca-Cola and World War II. Where did you get the sources for this section. Please contact me at User talk:Natl1.--Natl1 22:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
dyk's
I finally learned all I needed to know about malaysian law and precedence. You're making the rest of our law systems look bad lol (you got a little competition with the Phillipenes). Keep up the effort! Bakaman 23:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Loh Kooi Choon v. Government of Malaysia, was selected for DYK!
|
|
On December 28, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Loh Kooi Choon v. Government of Malaysia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 22:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Recovery of Abdul Taib Mahmud
Greetings johnleemk. The article referred above was deleted on the 25th due to copyvio. I am, however, looking for a way to restore it to its pre-copyvio state. Since the article was deleted, there are no edits which I can revert it to. Can you help in restoring the article?– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your assistance!– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 13:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
red links
Saw a couple of redlinks in your DYK, so I created the subarticles Surinder Singh Kanda v. The Government of the Federation of Malaya, Mohamed Azmi Mohamed, Ong Hock Thye and Category:Malaysian judges.Bakaman 23:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Assa Singh v. Menteri Besar of Johore, was selected for DYK!
|
|
On January 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Assa Singh v. Menteri Besar of Johore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 00:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Just a suggestion, John. Can you please try to re-word/shorten your DYK's. I noticed that some of yours have been exceeding in length, and seem too verbose, to say the least. Thanks again for all your DYK's. =) Nishkid64 22:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Public Prosecutor v. Khong Teng Khen & Anor., was selected for DYK!
|
|
On January 3, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Public Prosecutor v. Khong Teng Khen & Anor., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 03:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Johnson Tan Han Seng v. Public Prosecutor, was selected for DYK!
|
|
On January 4, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Johnson Tan Han Seng v. Public Prosecutor, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 21:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Just 'cuz I'm curious...
Hmm ... you wrote copyright law forbids the creation of derivative works without express permission from the copyright holder. But MATTEL INC. v. WALKING MOUNTAIN PRODUCTIONS [1] indicates a much greater leeway for transformative uses of copyrighted material. (And I really am trying to understand some of the finer legal points here...) Wikipedia would therefore be a "derivative" work in your view? Because I thought I read somewhere in this whole debate that taking a widely-released publicity photo and putting it in a non-profit encyclopedia would likely be more transformative than derivative. As I said, it's just 'cuz I'm curious... Jenolen speak it! 10:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
G'day. I hope you can spend a little time to take a look at the article and offer some comments on it.– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 10:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Added a little info on the Trisakti. As the sources (offline) that I've consulted so far made no mention that the Crown Colony flag and the 1870 flag was used together, I left out the 1870 flag, but made certain additions to the article.– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, it is similar. But not as similar as the Czech flag, where what one needs to do is just flip it over horizontally.– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair Use of City of Chicago Maps
Thanks for the Campbell's Soup explanation. On an unrelated fair use issue, I would like to add the Official City of Chicago Maps to all 77 City of Chicago officially designated community areas. What is necessary in this regards for uploading the 77 different .pdf files and appending them? TonyTheTiger 08:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am not sure I understand how either #1 or # 2 applies. #1 I believe it would be quite difficult to freely replace the map in order to adequately give the same information. #2 The maps are not being sold by the copyright holder thus use on WP would not make it so that one no longer needs to purchase the actual product. Nor would it truly replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media which serves (IMO). Please eplain further. TonyTheTiger 15:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I took the liberty of uploading another version of this picture over at Commons. Should I prepare a cropped version for EN and ZH Wikipedia?– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 17:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've added Wikisource:Malayan Proclamation of Independence. Perhaps you could offer some suggestions, or double-check the text. I'll be working on the Proclamation of Malaysia next.– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Usage of Chinese script in an Malaysian city article
You are probably tired of seeing my face on your talk page again.
There is a conflict (edit war?) going on on the usage of Chinese scripts in Kuching (see history page). I would like to hear your opinion/advice on this matter (Talk:Kuching).– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 10:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007
 WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| |
|
The question of capitalising of the letter "t" in The of The Beatles has been raised again. It appears that UK style references (here and here) also maintains that the letter should be in lower case. If the Project is to be appear professional then it may have to change the format. Polite discussion is invited at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Policy. If possible, please provide sources/references to support your position.
It has been a fairly quiet time with regard to the Project (or at least that is how it seems). If you are reading this and wondering why your efforts in respect of a Beatles article has not been mentioned, it may be that you haven't told any editor. This is your Newsletter, which means you can contribute to it, so please do! If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 010 – January/February 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
|
|
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
| |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. --AW 21:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Battle of the Somme FAR
Battle of the Somme has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 26 January, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Faridah Begum bte Abdullah v. Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Yomanganitalk 08:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
About Kuching
Can you please go to Talk:Kuching and state your comment on whether Jawi script is necessary or not. Just that Kawaputra insists on not having it. Thank you. --Zack2007 05:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lg_new_coke_logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lg_new_coke_logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 15:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
How did you get permission to use the Dewan Negara picture?
Hi John. For the picture uploaded by you onto Wikipedia, found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Dewan_negara.jpg, how did you obtain permission for fair use, and from whom did you obtain this permission? Thanks. AppleJuggler 12:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Appreciate your rapid response. Are American copyright laws consistent with Malaysian copyright laws? Could a situation arise where an authority from the Malaysian Parliament questions the use of this photograph on Wikipedia, despite the 'fair use' tag which, as it appears to me, is often very carelessly and broadly applied? AppleJuggler 12:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 10, February 2007
|
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| |
I look from the wings at the play you are staging While my guitar gently weeps As I'm sitting here doing nothing but aging Still my guitar gently weeps On the reverse of the page appears the lyrics to Hey Jude in the hand of Mal Evans.
|
Hottest issue or concern for this month is the perennial matter of Project articles losing their Good or Featured Article status. The main Project page now includes a status board that gives the current ratings of some of the more important articles. Let's make sure the core articles (The Beatles, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr) reach or retain Good Article status, if not Featured Article. If you are aware of another major article whose status is at risk, add it to the board.
Since there has been no response in the matter of the use of lowercase for the initial letter of the when applied with Beatles from the opponents, it is likely that the case for using lowercase only will be adopted as Project policy by default. User:LessHeard vanU will draw up a recommendation and submit it to the Policy talkpage in a few days.
We are pleased to welcome the contributions of Alexcalamaro to this newsletter. Any editor can include an item of interest or news; this medium can be an excellent tool for getting a comment seen by a great number of project members. As it says below, this is your newsletter. If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!
Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 011 – March 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
|
|
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
| |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
delivered by ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 03:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Cybergrind
I don't understand your action. The debate showed the outcome as 'no consensus' but the article has been deleted and protected. Why this antagonism towards a random music subgenre? In any case, the basic description was merged into Grindcore as a subgenre of it, so I don't see what the harm would be in at least making Cybergrind redirect there. Also, the page included a useful list of bands that is now inaccessible. This list should at least be copied into List of Grindcore Bands and pasted there under the "Cybergrind" subheading. Please don't ignore this. I understand that you may think this is just some made-up crap propelled by a few stupid kids, but the reality is that there are plenty of underground subgenres that will exist despite your dismissal and disparagement of them. It's hard enough to find reliable, non-biased information on underground music as it is without people trolling through Wikipedia deleting anything that's not pop or classic rock. Honestly, I think Wikipedia would be a lot better if editors restricted their jurisdiction to topics that they had some basic knowledge of. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Baligant (talk • contribs).
--Oh, ok, sorry about that - I was unaware there was a second nomination
Happy New Year
Happy New Year. --Ancheta Wis 10:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. is "Gumshi-gumshi" a recognizable greeting for New Years? Ancheta Wis
Fuzzy Zoeller edit controversy
Hello, there. As you may or may not know, the Miami Herald recently revealed that professional golfer Fuzzy Zoeller has filed a lawsuit against Josef Silny & Associates, Inc. for adding false statements to his Wikipedia biography.
For data gathering purposes, an SRS of 20 administrators has been created, you being one of them. I would like you to comment on this situation and its possible implications to Wikipedia, the accused company, and the general welfare of the community in general. (To what extent will this impact Wikipedia? To what extent will this impact those who use Wikipedia often? To what extent is the company guilty? Who do you believe is at fault?) Feel free to comment however you wish. I ask that you email me your responses via my emailuser page so as to reduce bias in your responses. (Again, don't post your responses on my talk page.)
The following are articles from various news agencies that you may use to inform yourself about the situation: Miami Herald, Herald Tribune, Web Pro News, The Smoking Gun.
I thank you for taking your time to express your opinion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. └Jared┘┌talk┐ 18:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
3RR on Timothy Noah
Actually, I thought you were correct for a second; I think if you look at the first of the three I was reverting vandalism[2]. Thanks for the reminder though; I'm more conscious of 3RR on articles I care about, at which point I must decide to either ignore the rules or not. Something I'm just keeping an eye on I'm way more likely to accidently go overboard. -- Kendrick7talk 17:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Follow-up
Dear Johnleemk,
Thank you for the comments you provided 2 months ago for the Ohio Wesleyan University page. Several people have worked on improving in the past few months. I just nominated it in the FAC process, so feel free to provide your opinion if you have the time. Thanks again! I very much appreciate it! LaSaltarella 03:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 11, March 2007
|
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| |
|
See below. There is genuine concern that the Newsletter is getting stale in terms of content and variety, and that the same individuals are featured each month. Furthermore, lack of "news" is hindering the timely distribution as the editors wait for something to report. All Project editors are encouraged to give their news, suggestions and thoughts to keep the 'Letter vital and interesting. If making direct contributions do not appeal, please give a mention on the Newsletter talkpage and it will be incorporated!
Help is needed for the job of putting future Newsletters together. The present incumbent is finding it difficult to reflect the breadth of the Project, focusing on much the same individuals and articles each month, and has decided to beg for contributions from other individuals. Interested persons need only start working on next months issue to qualify. It really is that simple! If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 012 – April 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
|
|
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
| |
){kind=link}
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
delivered by ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 00:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Johnleemk. I noticed the song sample you uploaded in 2004 on today's featured article, (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction. The song sample is 37 seconds, which is longer than the permitted "fair use" sample length under U.S. copyright law. Song samples must not exceed 30 seconds in length, or 10% of the duration of the recording, whichever is shorter. You can read more at Wikipedia:Music samples and Wikipedia:Fair use. Would you be able to upload a new sample which is less than 22.5 seconds long? Thanks. ~MDD4696 05:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I guess you're right about the law... I misconstrued the information at http://www.utsystem.edu/OGC/IntellectualProperty/confu.htm. ~MDD4696 14:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: User:Nosons
The user himself confessed of being a banned troll. Also, regarding the complaint, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Deskana#Re:_A_request --thunderboltz(TALK) 08:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Duran Duran FAR
Duran Duran has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. LuciferMorgan 16:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
weasel word
Regarding your edit here: Is Miller "some" who "believe"? It's still a weasel phrase and tagging it with the {{weasel word}} tag is the right thing. According to Wp:npov#A_simple_formulation, if there's a source for that a statement, it should be stated in the text who exactly (e.g. Author X) says what exactly (e.g. Quote Xy). So, if you know that this is attributable to Miller, please go ahead and rephrase it accordingly, and then delete the weasel tag. —AldeBaer 01:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- You're right, I could have fixed it myself. I just thought that removing the weasel tag without fixing it is not best practice. However, thanks for taking care of it. —AldeBaer 14:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted folks to know about real vampires.
I just wanted folks to know more about actual real vampires not just the ones in Hollywood. For centuries real vampires have lived in secrecy and practice the faith in secret. The whole negative discussion as to why my articles should be deleted just validates and supports vampires living in secret and not sharing anything about our lifestyle or faith with the mundane public. (Thank God the rest of the world is a little more open minded and civil, than some of these disgruntled, bitter, Wikipedians. I find myself laughing at the bitterness and hostile tone of some of these people. They should put this kind of energy into finding a cure for AIDS or ending world hunger. It is amazing that so many obviously, disgruntled, unhappy people are on Wikipedia. I guess not a lot of happy go lucky, out the coffin vampires like me are on Wikipedia. Maybe more people should take up the vampire faith. Although it might not help some of these severely depressed and repressed souls. Vampires just do not have the time or energy for this kind of negative energy. I feel really sorry for all those people who have nothing better to do besides sit around and discuss why someone does or does not have a right to post something on Wikipedia. It is really sad and precious time wasted on having a nasty attitude and a closed mind. These people make me thank my lucky stars I am a proud and very happy vampire.
Many Blessings and Hope All those Unhappy Wikipedians find something positive to do with their time and energy.
Vampire Libby Hodges
News Time
|
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| |
|
This has been a tumultuous month for the project yet again. We need your input on how the project should work and what it's role should be. And we need to start getting Featured Articles, folks! :)
This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 013 – May 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
|
|
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
| |
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
BetacommandBot 23:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Assistance wanted re: previously failed RfA.
Dear Sir,
I would like to ask for your assistance. About 14 months ago, I self nominated for an RfA, which I ultimately withdrew (see here). During that RfA, you lodged an oppose vote, and I have taken a lot of the comments from that failed RfA on board since then. I am now up to an average of near on 875 to 900 edits per year, having only recently got back to the net from health issues (Throat cancer), and I am once again considering attempting a request for adminship. I am writing to all those editors who opposed my original self-nomination to ask them to see if they would be kind enough to review my recent work, and to see whether they consider that I have taken those points from my old RfA on board enough to warrant another attempt.
I am enjoying getting back into the swing of working on Wikipedia again, and looking forward to enjoying many more years of work. I am now using Twinkle and VandalFighter for my reversion work on RCP and CVU, and looking to the future.
Thank you for your time, and for your comments.
Thorsteinn A. Malmjursson User:Iceflow / Formerly User:Tmalmjursson 17:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Regarding User: 221.148.48.216
Greetings, Johnleemk. I am sorry to bring this to your attention, but I see you have dealt with IP 221.148.48.216 earlier. Due to continued and widespread abuses, I have reported this IP to Suspected Sock Puppets. In addition to blanking the IP talk page of warnings, this IP has improperly used multiple user accounts. The abuse continues; my report of sockpuppetry is here: [5] if you have the time to contribute. I hope you do not mind, but I have quoted your statement regarding the final warning on the IP talk page (in the conclusion), as it sums up exactly the problem we are dealing with.
Thank you for your attention. Enigma3542002 08:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
If you haven't been watching the article or GAN, you'll be pleased to know that it is now a good article. I just thought you might be interested, as you were one of first people to comment on the article. Will (We're flying the flag all over the world) 03:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Regarding protection of Starcraft
Maybe it was a little to soon or maybe not even needed to lock the page. I noticed that the page was being flooded with "OMG starccraft 2 and just bad eddits Sorry. Natural number is e 06:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Harry Kretchmer
The article is about a fellow student at my college, of little note. The notability of the article has already been disputed and it should be deleted. He has created the article purely for publicity reasons, the article is not serious and is a joke; the fact that he is on Wikipedia for some rural newspaper articles written when he was 16 and a minor film appearance (which he obtained through living in the area of where the film was made, not talent) when he was 7 is a joke, and should be treated seriously if this resource has any integrity. I myself have have appeared on television a few times, most notably on the BBC's University Challenge, as well as writing for college publications and appearing in the student newspapers, yet do not have the gall to create an article about myself. I would suggest you think about the integrity of this resource as a reference tool, then look again at Harry Kretchmer, then take the correct course of action and delete this worthless article of no reference value. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.67.63.62 (talk • contribs).
Re: Paul Dobransky
I'm not going to contest the removal. But it could use more info. --Whstchy 16:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
deletion of iCM Freedom entry
Curious to understand why our competitors have entries of a very similar nature and yet my contribution was deleted as spam. New to this so would appreciate your feedback. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.153.216.20 (talk • contribs).
Deletion of Fundadores article
Please explain why you deemed this article spam? I would take issue with you on this point. The article is intended to be purely informational, and part of that information includes identifying brand owner, manufacturers, etc., the kind of data that cigar smokers want/need to see. If your objection is to the fact that the information was cited as coming from an online dealer catalogue, that is unfortunate, because that is currently the only source for this info. It may or may not be included in a future edition of Perelman's Pocket Cyclopedia of Cigars, but until/unless it is, I have no other source for the information included in the article. Please advise me of what you deem necessary in order to remove the article from the category of spam and move it into the realm of information. If I have not heard from you within three days, I will re-publish the article unchanged. Further, I have absolutely no connection whatsoever to the brand owner/retailer. Thank you. Glacierman 03:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Beatles-singles-from-me-to-you-us-1.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Beatles-singles-from-me-to-you-us-1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MER-C 05:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Ok thanks for letting me know!! :-)
Best regards
Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 16:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
New Dawn Fades
I know very well about PROD and AFD, thank you very much. It's more of me making a mistake in tagging the article. Evilclown93 13:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: OKCupid Wikipedia test
I think 96% is as high as you can get, actually. I'm not sure why that is. And yeah, that test is painfully out of date. I keep meaning to update it, but I'm not very active on either Wikipedia or OKCupid at the moment. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 17:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
David Mestel(Talk) 18:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, since it seems you deleted and then restored Fumadores, you might be willing to voice your opinion on the AfD. Cheers! -- lucasbfr talk 22:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Adam Leemon
Thats fine with me - I must have been mistaken. Thanks for fixing my error. Kind regards, Anonymous Dissident Utter 12:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Request for Protection
Hi John, this is youngyew / changyang1230. The Sekolah Menengah Damansara Utama page has been vandalised repeatedly in the past few days, and despite my reversion to a "good" version it was vandalised within days (refer to the history). Is that possible for you to semi-protect it against unregistered users? Thanks a lot! :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.219.254.46 (talk • contribs).
- Holy crap, that's insane. I just reverted to the last clean version and semiprotected it. Thanks for the heads-up. Johnleemk | Talk 16:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Yesterdaysample.ogg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Yesterdaysample.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 06:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Somethingsample.ogg
I have tagged Image:Somethingsample.ogg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 06:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Shelovesyousample.ogg
I have tagged Image:Shelovesyousample.ogg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 06:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Real-Love-sample.ogg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Real-Love-sample.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 06:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Real-Love-sample.ogg
I have tagged Image:Real-Love-sample.ogg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 06:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Norwegianwoodsample.ogg
I have tagged Image:Norwegianwoodsample.ogg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 07:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Getbacksample.ogg
I have tagged Image:Getbacksample.ogg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 07:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Frometoyousample.ogg
I have tagged Image:Frometoyousample.ogg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 07:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Norwegianwoodsample.ogg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Norwegianwoodsample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
E.T.
Thanks for the encouraging comments so far on the FAC. You will stick around right, to offer support/oppose when Bignole expand the Themes section? Alientraveller 17:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Bureaucratship again
Hello! In September 2005 you indicated your desire to be notified if and when I was nominated for bureaucratship again. As per your comment, I'm letting you know that I'm up for bureaucratship for the third and final time at Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Andrevan3, and your opinion would be welcome. It has been a while, so if you're no longer interested, I apologize and understand. Cheers, Andre (talk) 22:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Jude FAR
Hey Jude has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. LuciferMorgan 19:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
165.228.129.11's edits on Jeff Ooi
Hi. It's come to our attention a user under 165.228.129.11, registered under a Australian ISP, has been censuring and adding unreferenced attacks on the Jeff Ooi article.[6] [7][8][9][10] This behaviour clearly ignores both WP:CENSOR and WP:SOAP. Similiarly, the same IP address was used to perform minor vandalism on the same article in late-May and early-June.[11][12][13] Not suggesting the editting patterns are of the same person though.
Several people have revert changes made by the Telstra user, but the user has clearly remained persistent, reintroducing the same form of commentaries since the beginning of July. Your assistance is much appreciated.
Thanks. - Two hundred percent 01:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
(Copy from 165.228.129.11 reply reference page. Help needed.) To request unblocking:
IP address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:165.228.129.11 Blocking admin: Johnleemk Block reason: edit warring, adding potentially defamatory material to Jeff Ooi Block originally applied to: 165.228.129.11 Your account name (if you have one): An explanation of why your block is unfair: Changing baseless (no proof) statement, defame innocent company names. Defamation is unethical.
Hi Johnleemk,
I am using userID :4867219 (the IP you blocked)
I work for a PR firm. I try not to make wikipedia a commercial place which become a platform to defame companies without proof. My team of 2 person recently did a successful round of misinformation damage control for an International client using public education and soft fixing to avoid being too personal and stay within the line of truth and justice. The process went smoothly and cleared many unclear misunderstandings, and received strong media and public support. When I saw the Jeff Ooi vs commercial issue, the misinformation came long way to wikipedia carrying baseless claims, I have to fix this unfair event.
Refers to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Ooi
The User bio was OK to cite "facts" without framing "names" of "selected target" he wants to target. Unfortunately until this happens: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeff_Ooi&oldid=139193098 The User on 13:07, 19 June 2007 by username of Relaxtoday posted this statement:
Subject : SMS Scam
Currently Jeff is devoted in revealing SMS scam on his blog. His effort has gain mainstream media attention. He managed to show proof that companies like Macrokiosk and NextNation are involved is SMS spoofing, and also MCMC's lack of control over such problem.
Which is unfair to the target company, a system provider which serves large corporate customers (refers to their website) which has nothing to do with the issues Jeff wanted to make a point. I would suggest it could be fair and ethical to display a commercial issue without the smell of commercial defamation like this:
Subject : Spawned Clearer Defination of SMS, Spam and ScamSMS, Spam and Scam
The 1st sentence: "Currently Jeff is devoted in revealing the different stake holders in mobile industry and his effort has spawned the public to better understand the difference of SMS, spam and scam on his blog. His effort has gain some media attention" (arguable, only 1 small tabloit mistakenly quote "company names" which had appologized the next day for "misquotation". Jeff took that as his credit, but he did not slow the article "next day" which appology for their mistakes. In actual fact, the "main stream" media did not get the piece of information from Jeff but the vendors who being baselessly accused did their clarifications. The press in fact clearly explained the difference of SMS, spam and scam, and "did not name any software vendors such as <targetcompany1> and <targetcompany2>" in the press, and that is professional. Jeff can't get a credit for what the vendors PR company did and twist the facts. That is the type of ethical press freedom we want to see in Wikipedia. The vendor <companyname>, which was clarified by the authority as "unrelated" to SPAM or SCAM or SPOOFING, was "released from the mistaken accusation", so why Jeff take it personally? Because he can't proof, he has to make story to support his claims? Refers to: http://mobilebedsidenews.blogspot.com/2007/06/draft-technology-101-hardware-software.html and http://www.mcmc.gov.my/consumer/non_compliance.asp). Read the industry blog reveal the truth, and the MCMC statement which has nothing to do with "SPAM, SCAM or SPOOFING".)
The next defamation statement is unnecessary and too personal "He managed to show proof that companies like <target company1> and <target company2> are involved is SMS spoofing, and also MCMC's lack of control over such problem." This could be fairly quote as "He managed to show some proof of sms issues and trying to find the relationship between the issues and the stake holders, namely the mobile operators, the vendors and the public."
Jeff "FAILS" to proof that there is any SMS spoofing out there (no UFO ok!) despite some spam which has nothing to do with the 2 victims. The statement above is a commercial attack without proof. Until today, there is no single proof of "SPAM, SCAM or SPOOFING" did by the 2 victims(Quote spoofing proof here if can find 1 piece of scientific evidence). In actual fact, the actual vendors which has clients doing SPAM was not cited, such as: Mobile365 (aka Sybase365), AKN Mtech and Lanetro Zed. Why Jeff only wanted to target only 2 companies but not the other vendors? Read this detailed analysis: http://mobilebedsidenews.blogspot.com/2007/05/akn-mtechs-uncle-lim-man-who-kills.html
Technically and realistically, there is NO WAY any third party could do spoofing except mobile operators themselves. Jeff good intention to stop SPAM or SCAM, is like many techies who wanted to stop email SPAM and SCAM, which is OK. Despite many good intention friends remind him of his misjudgement, he still promote baseless SMS spoofing story until he touches misinformation on "financial numbers", which is serious crime in Malaysia. Finally Jeff Ooi stopped his baseless comments. Jeff is indeed getting into trouble and proof himself of "generalize" different issues and "defame" people mixing truth and lie.... which is sad to see he step into the other side, went too far.
Questions:
1. Jeff Ooi on his website has been feeded mix sources of information, "generalize" SMS to SPAM and SCAM. Just like people used to generalize email providers = spam = scam supporters.
2. Jeff Ooi highlighted the companies which provides system and has basic system errors, which has been "proven unrelated to spam or scam or spoofing", and was released from MCMC questions. The authority questioned "all the top 20 vendors", not just the 2 names Jeff Ooi pick for some reason.
3. There is not a single proof of spoofing up to date, nor spam or scam related to the vendors. There are "SPAM and SCAM" from China and South Africa reported in the past, which are totally other issue.
After the local media and public had made known to "differentiate SMS, SPAM and SCAM", during June 2007, the misinformation and people who over carried by Jeff's generalized blog has resulted in spoiling Wikipedia? Is this what Wikipedia suppose to be a baseless commercial defamation platform?
The Wikipedia Earth did it right by revert back the original unspoiled posting: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeff_Ooi&oldid=144760085
However, for some reason, the "Relaxtoday" wikipedia user seems to be supporting baseless defamation work and add the no proof statement again on: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeff_Ooi&oldid=144765568
Is this what Wikipedia will end up with, supporting commercial defamation and personal attacks?
Kristy
Singapore
Hi guys, I am new to here, I don't know how or where to get help. Can't let unjust issue hanging out there, sorry if I post wrong section etc. please give guidance to help me put justice in place :'(
Replaceable fair use Image:Badruddin_amiruldin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Badruddin_amiruldin.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
CloseAFD.js
Seems like a great tool but I'm having a problem. I should have come straight to you (slapping forehead), but I posted my question at the help desk. In the interest of not repeating, please see Wikipedia:Help desk#What does this template do?. You can respond there, here, or to my talk page; doesn't matter. Thanks in advance.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Aimee Allen
Please undelete the page "Aimee Allen". If you search "Aimee Allen" the Wikipedia article called "Aimee allen" comes up with the last name being lowercase. Unfortunately any pages elsewhere link you to the wiki article "Aimee Allen" which has been prohibited. It seems that you administrated the decision to delete the article. I think you will now find that she meets and exceeds all guidelines and criteria for both and artist and a composer/lyricist. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Revolucian (talk • contribs).
Review of Wee Meng Chee
Hi again. Mind taking a look at Wee Meng Chee as a third party and give your two cents on what can be improved? There are comments on the talk page stating that descriptions of a song and reactions is seemingly overwritten. Thanks. - Two hundred percent 18:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
You're Invited!
Apa Kabar,
I have just joined WikiProject Malaysia and have contributed to the article Malaysian Indian by expanding it. Hope you like it. Regards.
|
Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Dravidian civilizations. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Dravidian related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You. |
Wiki Raja 06:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
It's a long time ago now (Dec 2005), and it doesn't really matter, but I was amused by this and wondered if you just had an off day, or if you had a reason for your decision. Regards SilkTork *SilkyTalk 06:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Clanton, Mississippi
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Clanton, Mississippi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 09:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Clanton, Mississippi
Clanton, Mississippi, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Clanton, Mississippi satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clanton, Mississippi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Clanton, Mississippi during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 17:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject:Malaysia collaboration of the Month is Malaysia
Hi there. Based on the majority votes, we have selected Malaysia to be our first Collaboration of the month for October 2007. Please feel free to contribute and make suggestions to improve the article. Thanks! kawaputratorque 05:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
You're question concerning the Backstreet Boys!
All of them sing, just at different times. They are known for their wonderful harmonies and they all play some sort of instrument. They only play those instruments at certain times though. Nick plays the drums, Kevin plays the piano and keyboards, Brian plays the Guitar (usually accoustic), AJ plays the bass guitar, and Howie plays the Electric Guitar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweetheart8181 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Dew Crew
What did you do with the Dew Crew??? You deleted their page. That is unfair to them. Immortal301 (Not to be confused with Immortal300 who was framed for erasing part of your site*)
- A friend was using Immortal300 when Immort300 did that, Immort300 couldn't do anything about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Immortal301 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
About you
Hi, nice to meet you! I heard that you're a Malaysian admin right? I think you're the first admin from Malaysia I know. Btw you're a Chinese right? Do you know Chinese? If not, why not you use the zh-0 box in your Babel? Because if you're a Chinese, you'll probably expected to know Chinese... --Edmund the King of the Woods! 11:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Yvonne Foong?
Hi Johnleemk,
May I draw your attention to the article here: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yvonne_Foong). It seems awfully like vanity. What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.184.30.185 (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles
Your user name is on the “Inactive, or have just popped out for a cup of tea...” list on the Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles page. You can move it back to the “Participants” list if you feel this is not the case. :) -- WikiProject The Beatles 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
WP Malaysia December 2007 collaboration of the month
Hi there, based on this month's total votes, our collaboration of the month will be none other than our capital city as well as Malaysia's primate city of Kuala Lumpur! Please feel free to make improvements on the article, or comment or give ideas on ways to further improve the quality of the article. Thanxzsz. kawaputratorque 04:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal
It has been proposed that WP:EPISODE be merged into WP:WAF. Your input is desired, so please comment here. Ursasapien (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Salleh_Abas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Salleh_Abas.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Beatles-singles-please-please-me-us-2-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Beatles-singles-please-please-me-us-2-1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:May 13 aftermath.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:May 13 aftermath.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
WP Malaysia: January 2008 collaboration
Hello, based on the total votes collected in December, our collaboration of the month will be ♦ Mahathir bin Mohamad ♦. Please feel free to make improvements on the article, or comment or give ideas on ways to further improve the quality of the article. Thanks. kawaputratorque 18:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Getback roof.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Getback roof.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of McDonald's urban legends
An editor has nominated McDonald's urban legends, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McDonald's urban legends (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you mentioned you would reconsider your opposition if the time limit was extended. The time 'limit' was removed [14] and it has now been published in the mailing list and in the watch list (none of this by me) generating significant more discussion so I hope this has address your concerns. Nil Einne (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Close AFD script
Hi, do you mind if I tear apart your closing AFD script to work for TfD and MfD (and possibly other deletion debates)? Thanks. jj137 ♠ 03:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just making sure. :) Thanks jj137 ♠ 12:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [15]. --Maniwar (talk) 23:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Real-love2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Real-love2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Question about the script CloseAFD
Hi. I see you created this so was wondering if it were possible to add another feature to it. Actually, half a feature. When relisting AfD's, this script only adds the Template:Relist to the AfD page. Is it possible to have the script move the entry to the current days AfD log as well? Maybe, maybe not, I just know that would help the process ;-) . Thanks. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have an idea that might make this easier; have the user open up the current log in another tab/window, and then get the script to insert the relisted AFD under the "add new entries here" comment? Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 01:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Would you mind if I take the code and see what I can do? I'm by no means an experienced coder, but I think that if I can steal some elements of Twinkle it might be doable. Thoughts? Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 01:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting us know. - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:REALLUV1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:REALLUV1.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
This has been nominated at DRV here; as you closed the AfD two years ago (it's been recreated since thenn and speedied as a recreation), you might be interested in commenting. Cheers Iain99Balderdash and piffle 11:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Malaysia announcement
Hi there. I just want to announce that this month's collaboration will be ΦЏ Orang Asli ЏΦ. You are encouraged to participate in improving the quality of this article by however means you wish. I would suggest that our target by the end of the month would be for this article to achieve a Good Article status. Happy editing! kawaputratorque 13:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Years late, congradulations on getting Teddy featured. Cheers, Basketballone10 02:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem. (YAY GIANTS!) Basketballone10 03:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- In fact, I'm a Cowboys fan, and (almost) hate both Giants and Pats, but better Giants. Basketballone10 03:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy new year
Glad to see you are at Dartmouth. It's cold at these latitudes! --Ancheta Wis (talk) 13:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TunHusein.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:TunHusein.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Script QUestion
I noticed that you created the Close AFD script. Is it possible to edit it so that it works on all xFDs? The Placebo Effect (talk) 14:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grossmanattack.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Grossmanattack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for standing up to stop the Maki Pulido article being deleted
Thanks Johnleemk, i just saw your comment in the edit page "19:53, 1 October 2007 Johnleemk (Talk | contribs) (518 bytes) (we do not delete articles on CNN journalists, so why do we differ on 3rd world journalists?". Very true indeed Drjonesgp (talk) 07:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Pictures
I didn't travel widely because I only concentrated around my area and that of Nik Nazmi. But I have Nik Nazmi (posted), Tony (posted), Goh Burne and Hannah Yeoh. I think I have Nurul Izzah somewhere but I can't find it. __earth (Talk)
Image:Heyjude.jpg
I have tagged Image:Heyjude.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Nurul Izzah Anwar
|
On 15 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nurul Izzah Anwar, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 10:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
April 2008 collaboration
Hi there. We need more votes again for our April 2008 collaboration. As of March 27, only 6 members have voted. Please do exercise your right to vote! Thanks! :-) White2020 (talk) 04:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Conclusion: Image placeholders centralized discussion
Hi. I'm sending this to you because you participated in the Centralized discussion on image placeholders that ended on 23 April.
That discussion must produce a conclusion.
We originally asked "Should the addition of this box [example right] be allowed? Does the placeholder system and graphic image need to be improved to satisfy policies and guidelines for inclusion? Is it appropriate to some kinds of biographies, but not to others?" (See introduction).
Conclusions to centralized discussions are either marked as 'policy', 'guideline', 'endorsed', 'rejected', 'no consensus', or 'no change' etc. We should now decide for this discussion.
Please read and approve or disapprove the section here: Conclusion --Kleinzach (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Please note this message conforms to WP:CANVASSING and has not been sent to anyone has not already participated in the centralized discussion.
Theodore Roosevelt FAR
Theodore Roosevelt has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
CloseAfD
Hi John. I was wondering if you could help me out. The script doesn't seem to work in my monobook, and I was just wondering if you could tell me where I was going wrong! I've tried copying the script on WP:US and a copy in Philippe (talk · contribs)'s monobook. Thanks! PeterSymonds (talk) 19:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem! :) Thanks for the quick response. Maybe another one can be made; I'll file another request. Best wishes, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Notability Problem
Hi Johnlee, Hope everything is going well. You might remember me from the days when I frequented heavengames.com as Sharpe novel reader. I've run into an issue regarding an article, and after remembering you were a wikipedia administrator I was wondering if you could give me some advice?
I have been editing an article on a local politician who I'm friends with, however opposition activists have repeatedly deleted the article citing it breaches notability guidelines. From what I understand, a local politician is not automatically disqualified from an entry provided they are notable outside of the immediate area in which they serve as an elected politician. My friend has appeared on a number of national politics shows providing a local government politicians perspective on central government grants. The article in question is "Jeremy Moulton" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Moulton) which has been redirected to the Southampton article repeatedly despite my complaint in the discussion section of the page.
Cheers
Chris (SNR)
Emily Oster is not notable
A tag has been placed on Emily Oster, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Emily Oster and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Emily Oster is not notable. Her page constitutes advertising for her own agenda. There are many many economists much more famous than her and none of them have pages; probably justly so. Please delete her entry.
Thanks for preventing the page Norman Riley from deletion Ruerd (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Beatles-singles-i-want-to-hold-your-hand-us-1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Beatles-singles-i-want-to-hold-your-hand-us-1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Beatles-singles-iwanttoholdyourhand-1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Beatles-singles-iwanttoholdyourhand-1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (Image:FELDA logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:FELDA logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Hello, thank you for creating the helpful script Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/CloseAFD.js. Can there be an option made so that "non-admin closure" could be an option inserted into the end of the edit summary? Cirt (talk) 02:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Cirt asked me if I could make the changes, so I went ahead and added non-admin closure and cleaned up a few things. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Something has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. -- K. Annoyomous24[c] 06:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Shelovesyou-us2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Shelovesyou-us2.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
Hi Malaysians! Please take a note at List of schools in Malaysia. Me, Mark Chung (talk) would like to invite all Malaysians to contribute to this list. If you can understand and contribute in Malay, please have a look at http://forum.engkabang.net for more information. This project is leaded by me. If you are interested, please sign your name at User:Mark Chung/School Project Members before 17/11/2008. I will plan later steps. Thanks. Mark Chung (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Ohai Johnleemk, I see that you are listed towards the top of this page, which means you have experience with article writing and expanding articles -- getting them featured. I'd like you to check out the WikiCup, beginning in January for the fourth cup. ayematthew ✡ 23:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
January 2009 collaboration
Hi there. We need more votes again for our January 2009 collaboration. As of December 7, only 4 members have voted. Please do exercise your right to vote! Thanks! :-) White2020 (talk) 08:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)