User talk:Calibrador

This is Calibrador's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

American Idol

Is the rock 'n roll week edit okay now?

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 00:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is already a set template established for the performance charts. Quit changing it. Gage (talk) 00:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TX-14

Let me explain why I deleted TX-14 here, where I have more room. We're only including districts where the incumbent is or is considering retirement or where s/he may be in a competitive reelection. To determine how vulnerable an incumbent is to a potential or declared challenger we need a verifiable, non-partisan source saying that the incumbent may be vulnerable. For instance, regarding SC-04, we have a Politico page saying the incumbent, Bob Inglis, is vulnerable to a primary challenge. For RI-01 we have an article from The Hill saying that Congressman Patrick Kennedy may be vulnerable to a Republican challenger despite Kennedy representing a very Democratic district.

The problem with the source you provided is that it is not non-partisan, it's clearly pro- Ron Paul. If we had a source such as CQ or Politico saying Paul may be vulnerable to Jeffrey Cherry that would merit putting TX-14 on the 2008 House page. But since we don't, we have no reason to see Paul as vulnerable to a primary challenge. Just drawing a challenge isn't enough to warrant placing TX-14 on the page: we need a non-partisan source telling us that Paul may be in danger. This doesn't mean that Cherry won't become competitive or isn't already competitive, it just means that until we have a credible source saying Paul may be in danger, we shouldn't include TX-14.

I hope this made more sense than my other explanation did. If you have any questions about what I said or disagreements, please put them on the 2010 House Elections discussion page. CylonCAG (talk) 01:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Finale

I've opened a discussion on the American Idol (season 8) talk page. iMatthew : Chat 19:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Homer Simpson.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Homer Simpson.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AI8

We have a user adding the "new" formatted tables without a consensus. Any help would be appreciated. I myself am very tired of the constant changes, almost all without a real consensus. --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 12:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama Timeline

Great work and additions. My hope is that you won't mind if I caution you to be brief and controlled in your descriptions, etc. It is a timeline which is intended to be a chronology of "He was here, He did that. He met her:then signed a bill into law.'" with as little commentary as possible. The wider the door to commentary gets, the more political POV's we will encounter as the Administration proceeds. So far, it has been understood. Again, great edits and photos. (Not to sure about Judge Sotomayor Mom comments)...Take Care....--Buster7 (talk) 01:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gage...not to crazy about "reset". It seems a bit jargoney. I'm gonna change to "restructure". HAGD.--Buster7 (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I put it in quotes because I had actually taken it from the CNN article that I added as a reference, and Secretary Clinton had used the exact word "reset" a few months ago in regards to Russian relations, but I see no problem in changing it to "restructure." Gage (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, Gage. I see that now. If 'reset' becomes the active media word we can always change it back.--Buster7 (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous great work.--Buster7 (talk) 23:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Offer Shlomi

You're right, it is. That's pretty weird... I always knew him as Vince Offer. I wonder why he goes by Vince? <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I assume it is just a nickname he decided to give himself. Gage (talk) 06:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinked

I noticed you tagged the article Christina Tchen as overlinked. I routinely check this category, and so I noticed this. I must say I do not see any irrelevant links in this article. Nor does it seem overly linked to me. It might be that the problem is the other way around: that there should be more text in this article. Anyway, I'd like to ask you to reconsider, or to remove any links you deem superfluous yourself. Debresser (talk) 23:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was referring to all of the redlinks within the article. Is that not the correct Template to use in that case? Gage (talk) 23:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read Wikipedia:Red link? Based on that, I would say that all redlinks in this article may be kept. I agree with you that is leaves to be desired from an estetic point of view, but I think they are all valid redlinks. Consequently, IMHO, this article is not overlinked. Debresser (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama kids

Hello - I'll have to look for it - there were discussions about whether there should be a separate article(s) for the girls and it was decided that they didn't have independent notability, so were more appropriately handled as part of the family article. If you could hold off, I'll locate the discussions. You're of course welcome to discuss it, and if consensus has changed, that's fine - but please don't just reinstate. Thanks Tvoz/talk 06:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the delete discussion (speedy delete, in fact) for an earlier version of an article about Malia - there may have been additional discussions as well. I'll take a look tomorrow. Tvoz/talk 06:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I was aware of that discussion, and that consensus of deletion was made before Obama's election as president. Anyway, if there were any other discussions regarding the article more recently, I would be glad to have a look at those as well. Thanks again. Gage (talk) 06:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio Napolitano

Because he is already cite just before--87.3.185.218 (talk) 18:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I noticed that right after I readded his name. Do you have a reference for what you added about Giorgio Napolitano? As I was not able to find it in the reference that I had added. Gage (talk) 18:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, nevermind, thanks for adding a reference. Gage (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Legal Adviser of the Department of State

I noticed that you have recently edited the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, and I was wondering if you had any thoughts regarding the merger proposal I have initiated relating to that article. Please feel free to share any thoughts relating to my proposal on the article's Talk page. --TommyBoy (talk) 02:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For your excellent image of Mr. Groening, File:Matt Groening by Gage Skidmore.jpg! :-) The leftorium 10:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seth MacFarlane pic

Hi, Gage. Thanks so much for the picture! Do you think it would bother you if we move the pic. to speaking engagements, because he is speaking at ComicCon? Thanks. miranda 20:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. Gage (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential Election 2012 article

Hi there,

Myself and Timmeh have had a strong discussion about a major change to this article. Before we did anything we wanted to get feedback from regular editors of this page, William S. Saturn, Hysteria18, Jerzeykydd, Ratemonth, JayJasper, GoodDay, Qqqqqq, GageSkidmore, Reywas92, and FallenMorgan. Please send this to anyone else I may have left and please read the thread on Ruled Out and give us your feedback.

--Diamond Dave 16:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by David1982m (talk • contribs)

Sotomayor Image

You're right it doesnt matter, I am sure the image will be replaced with her official supreme court portrait once it is taken anyway. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hence the reason why I tentively readded her circuit court image, which I had previously removed. I think the circuit court image can suffice until her official Associate Justice portrait is released, so I will readd it now, unless you object. Gage (talk) 16:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No objection here, happy editing. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe svg map

Hi! It's not that I have an issue against svg format. I just prefer using the png version for the Miss Universe 2009 results map for the sake of consistency--all results map since 1952, as well as for the other major pageants, are not just in png formats, but also use the world map version with connectors. Hence, if svg format is the preferred version of this great editor, then kindly backtrack all the remaining maps just for the pageant maps to hold the same format. Joey80 (talk) 02:36, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're still not responding to this message despite changing the Miss Universe 2009 results map to svg format again. Joey80 (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've already responded to your similar statement on the Commons. Gage (talk) 02:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey Gage, thanks again for keeping Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama constantly updated! I've been a bit neglectful since early spring and will try to get back into the routine. Besides, with healthcare this fall there will be plenty to write about... Joshdboz (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, any help is appreciated, as it has been a bit of a chore to constantly update the article. I try my best though. Gage (talk) 12:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Henry

Hi, I see you moved Mike Henry to a disambiguated title, and put a dab page up instead. When you do that, please watch out for "What links here" and avoid leaving links that go to the disambiguation page instead of a destination article. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 18:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, thank you for making me aware of this. Gage (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No apology needed! and anyway, it gave me an excuse to upgrade AWB! --AndrewHowse (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avid has a new logo

Hi Gage, I have colleagues who work for Avid Technologies and they asked me to reach out to you because they have a new trademarked logo which is the legally approved version. I don't believe I have privileges to overwrite the logo you had put up at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avid_Technology. I have it in JPG (see link below where I posted it to my Facebook page) ... please let me know if you can help us with this or give advice?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3603540&id=680996321

I can get you the names of my Avid contacts to verify the veracity of this logo, just let me know what you need from me. Thanks! Greendmedia (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've uploaded a new version. Is that sufficient for your new trademarked logo? And feel free to upload the JPG version, if it isn't. If you're too new, you can just make ten edits and you should be able to upload images. Gage (talk) 19:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kara Vallow

I was asked by Kara to replace her picture on the page. She doesn't like the image of her and doesn't want it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RbiCreative (talk • contribs) 07:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

family guy season pages

Family guy does not have season DVD releases and the seasons are spread out on multiple volumes. For the case of season 5, it was released on volume5 and the second part on volume 6. The volume 6 info needs to be added to the season 5 page. It can also be added to the season 6 page since volume 6 contains episodes from that season as well. Grande13 (talk) 14:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Con

I have created a column for non-featured, notable guest/attendees. I hope this assist, and we can aviod an edit war. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please join us at Talk:San Diego Comic-Con International to help resolve the present issue regarding the article. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avid logo revisited

Hi Gage! I got a note from my friend at Avid and he tells me he had sent me the wrong version of the logo. I am sorry to bother you again, would you please replace the current logo with the one I recently attached in my Facebook account at http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/photo.php?pid=3719958&id=680996321

I appreciate the assist! Liz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.225.137 (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fixed. Let me know if you need anything else. Gage (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Sanford on 2012 Republican Primary Page?

I think the Sanford debate will never end, lol. I have 3 sources that are still discussing Mark Sanford in conjunction to 2012 that are less than 6 months old, but JerzeyKydd is still insisting that discussion for him has ceased for 6 months. The sources I added are less than 6 months. I agreed to take down Ensign because no one is talking him in conjunction 2012, but why are people still talking about Sanford in conjunction 2012? I was wondering if maybe you wanted to add your feedback to this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012. Thanks. --Diamond Dave (talk) 22:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brian's Got a Brand New Bag‎

I don't have cable or dish, so I can't confirm if the episode has aired on Adult Swim or not. Are you able to confirm or deny its airing? CTJF83 chat 17:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Grande13 confirmed it did not air, thanks anyway :) CTJF83 chat 18:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

can you help me in the lead of the FG cast, i am not good at them.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy

Hi, I noticed you uploaded an image of the design changes of Peter Griffin, I have two questions I would like to ask you. This "pilot" episode you took the first screenshot from, I've never heard/read about it, do you have some information about? Also, I noticed in the image description that you used the Family Guy Volume 1 DVD as a source, do you own this DVD? Because its special features might help expand the Peter Griffin article's Development section. Thanks.--Music26/11 11:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can actually watch the pilot episode on YouTube by simply searching for "Family Guy pilot," and you should be able to find it. And I don't have the volume one DVD, sorry. Gage (talk) 11:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No prob, just curious.--Music26/11 13:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FG2

I am making this section because the other one is too long, hey can you do me a favor couls you check on the FG history and tell me what do you think it needs, and this is juust a questio as i am new add FL when you make someones concerns they should supporrt but we have made concerns and we do not have any supporrt.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you are wanting me to do. Gage (talk) 14:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what you think it is not a review just your opinion.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Think about what? Sorry, I'm still a little confused. Gage (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, if it has a good shape, prose, refrences, i am planing to make it a GA.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:10, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The History of Family Guy article? Gage (talk) 15:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sorry for being so confuseing and not giveing detail hope to be forgivin .--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks very good overall. I think it could use some free-use images, of MacFarlane maybe, or the like. It should have a very good chance of becoming GA, in my opinion. Gage (talk) 15:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)b[reply]

Thanks Gage, can you connect.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added copule of refs to brian dose hollywood hope i could help.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are they so many merge articals in the season 3.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because they were all unreferenced. I'm working on it though. Gage (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you need help with? I'm not happy with any of the pages just being merged. CTJF83 chat 22:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, adding references to all the articles currently tagged with the Template:Notability banner. This includes a majority of the season 3 articles. For a rough example, see this as a very basic guideline. And for the articles that were merged (without any consensus whatsoever), adding references, and reverting the merges by Feydey should help to establish notability. Gage (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, an admin should know better than to just merge with no consensus and no real reason. I'll get to work on them later tonight. CTJF83 chat 22:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on! Why are you removing the season episode list from episode pages?? CTJF83 chat 23:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go ahed and ask the same question.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was only following what was done on the North by North Quahog article. Gage (talk) 23:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O yes now i remember, it is samller but a bit anoinan is ther any way to do like the simopsons articals.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok, you just haven't the list of episode link to the other pages. CTJF83 chat 23:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what source are you using for the family guy episodes airdates for dog gone and such Grande13 (talk) 14:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need you opinion here --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gage can byou put producction to the non-GA episodes of season 5 i think nyou have the dvds.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Will try doing homework so it willl take time but i will.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

could not find any will help in disscusion--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 00:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that the artical did not make FL but i will try it again in a small amount of time.Cheers.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you now how to copy-edit--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not copyedit. Ask User:Scapler again. Gage (talk) 21:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUFF Puppy image

Hey where did you get that T.U.F.F. Puppy promo image? It looks awesome!76.255.214.133 (talk) 06:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC) a man who awaits the premire of said show[reply]

It was released by Butch Hartman on his personal Facebook. Gage (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, I take it you want to see the show too?76.255.214.133 (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I just simply saw the article needed an image. Gage (talk) 00:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just felt like asking76.255.214.133 (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Con

You maybe interested in the fact that User:MikeWazowski has not allowed the reintroduction of removed content in the compromise column which was created for said content. You are more then welcome to join in the present discussion regarding the matter.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 14:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FG season 5

look gage i say peace no more fights, look i was thinking tha after the list passes(god make it happen)can you help me out makeing the season a GT--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

County maps

Hey. I remember for the NJ gubernatorial election and the Massachusetts senate election you put a blank county map. Do you know where I can find a blank county map for any state??????--Jerzeykydd (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You create your own. Gage (talk) 00:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Jersey Counties Outline.svg also. CTJF83 chat 00:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of recurring characters in Family Guy‎

Do you really think we need this page? It looks incomplete as it stops at D. CTJF83 chat 07:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article can be greatly improved, redirecting the article as opposed to expanding it simply because it looks incomplete is wrong, in my opinion. Gage (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do you separate a character from a recurring one? CTJF83 chat 22:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A recurring character is a supporting character, such as a coworker, a family friend, local celebrities, extended relatives and townspeople. With most of these characters as one-time jokes, a number of them have garnered expanded roles and have subsequently starred in future episodes, as well as in their own episodes. Death, Consuela and Angela are just a few examples of this. Gage (talk) 05:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photografic genisus

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For your images on The cast, the show and the pilot you are the best image updater ever, but sadly i can only give you this hope at least it can make you see what you do for Fg and for the simpsons, THANKS;)--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Wanted to let you now i have nominated Family Guy for FAC and informeing major FG contributers.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

Gage remember as season 5 renominaated could you give me a hand, your support did not count as Dabomb added you as a nominator(which you are you helped alot in the last FLC) so could you give me a han d maybe contact users to review or something. ThAnKs--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Night Live

A proposal has been created for WikiProject Saturday Night Live. Please leave comments, and consider joining as a potential project member.Mainly.generic (talk) 13:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Road to the Multiverse GAN

Could you help me a bit on the ploy\t it may need a bit of re-word, its on GAN.--Saint Pedrolas J. ^{Hohohohohoh merry christmas} 01:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debate over whether or not Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford should be removed the 2012 Rep Primary Page

There seems to be yet another debate over Mark Sanford and now whether not Bobby Jindal should remain on this page. Since you are an editor on this page, I was hoping you would be interested in joining the discussion at the link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012#This_article_is_not_about_who_will_be_running.3F

Please provide your feedback! Thanks so much!

--Diamond Dave (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Conway

What's the problem with the picture of him that I uploaded?--Jerzeykydd (talk) 00:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The government of Kentucky isn't the United States government. Portraits by individual states, in most cases, are not in the public domain. Gage (talk) 01:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I personally emailed the Attorney General and he said that it is ok for me to use the pic for wikipedia. What should I do now?--Jerzeykydd (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:OTRS. Gage (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rand Paul

You made a mistake. MJ787123 is the vandal on the Rand Paul page, I am the one who just recently corrected all his stuff. And put your previous photos back where they were.

Also, re:Rand Paul's middle name, yes I have a source. If you go here: https://cdcbp.ky.gov/VICWeb/VIC and look up Randal Paul and his date of birth, you can see his middle name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CullVernon (talk • contribs) 09:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of things

Hi. I've been looking over your contributions and you certainly seem to do good work here. I've gone ahead and issued you rollback rights. Please be careful with the privilege - it can be easily lost. I recommend you carefully read up on the what you should do and should not do with rollback, then practice here before using it. I'm confident you'll use it wisely. If for some reason you don't want it, let me know and I'll revert. You may wish to display {{User rollback}} on your user page.

The other thing, is you really should start archiving this talk page. It's getting rather long and unweildy.

Happy editing. Toddst1 (talk) 14:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Obama cabinet nominations

Template:Obama cabinet nominations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.. — MrDolomite • Talk 07:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FG

Hey gage have not heared from you in a while, sorry to say that the FLC did not pass.--Saint Pedrolas J. ^{Hohohohohoh merry christmas} 12:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements in Texas

We can try to consolidate it like Mitt Romney's endorsements in Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2008.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that. Gage (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dog Gone (Family Guy)

Hey, I've conducted the GAN review for Dog Gone (Family Guy). There are a number of sourcing concerns that need to be addressed before it can pass. Please see my comments in the review page. Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 21:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've passed the article. Nice work! — Hun ter Ka hn 05:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! Gage (talk) 05:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Hello, Calibrador. You have new messages at NielsenGW's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Trey Grayson

This article could use some updating. I have noticed that you have provided many pertinent facts about Mr. Grayson for this article in the recent past.

Kentucky senate race

If a primary election has two or more candidates who have photos, than there is no reason not to have it.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 12:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No other Senate article has photos. It is not necessary, especially since you continually removed the three minor candidate's photos and names from the Republican candidates section, to have photos. It is irrelevent. Gage (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quagmire's Dad

Hi, I am reviewing your GA nomination and have made a few comments at Talk:Quagmire's Dad/GA1. I think it is a fine article, but I felt the lead needed a little more. Please feel free to change what I added. Best wishes, Xtzou (Talk) 17:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Election result tables in United States Senate election in California, 2010

Hi GageSkidmore! It appears that you have reverted the formating for the primary result tables at United States Senate election in California, 2010. You have replaced Template:Election box begin no party no change, which is intended for use in non-partisan and primary elections, with Template:Election box begin no change, which is intended only for partisan elections. It doesn't really make sense to use Template:Election box begin no change because there is no need to list which party each candidate belongs to in a primary election. I understand that some other articles may use the formating that you prefer, but I feel that is both irrelevant and erroneous since the other formating is better suited for this type of election. – Zntrip 23:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elections held in California are no different from the rest of the country. It is irrelevent whether the party is shown or not, however, every other article in relation to the 2010 midterm elections, besides those held in California apparently, use the format that I have attempted and reattempted to include in the article. Ignoring that fact does not rationalize your explanation for inclusion of the supposed "non-partisan" format. Gage (talk) 23:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just saying that it doesn't make sense to list the party name five times in a row when its a given that all the candidates belong to the same party. It's redundant. Just because the other template is used in other articles is irrelevant; did it ever occur to you that perhaps the format of the other articles can be changed? Other than the fact that Template:Election box begin no change is used elsewhere, is there any other reason that it should be used in place of Template:Election box begin no party no change? – Zntrip 00:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to use the no party template in the article, then fine. My opinion of the matter is still unchanged. Gage (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Calibrador. You have new messages at Diannaa's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Partial TermsI don't actually read The Mail on Sunday because it is an organ of racism and social malnutrition, but I'd guess the review is out of five stars. It's not really a "review" so much as a "pick of the day" thing. The full text is: "Family Guy 10PM, BBC3 **** / Two more new episodes of Seth MacFarlane's crazy, frequently brilliant animated comedy, opening with Stewie (left) taking drastic measures to get on TV." I just added it because otherwise the article won't have a reception section until the DVD comes out in the States. Bradley0110 (talk) 12:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Spies Reminiscent of UsHi! I am wanting to clear this article from the Requests page and was wondering if you want the whole article done, or just the marked section? I find the plot section intimidating in its length and would not know how to trim it effectively as I have not seen the episode and do not know which events were the most important. I will go ahead with the marked section for now. --Diannaa ^TALK 02:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Well, I think the whole article would be most beneficial. If you cut something important out, I'll try to readd it, as I am very familiar with the episode. Gage (talk) 04:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] OK, I got through it. If you could explain the last bit: How does "Thriller" help Ackroyd hack into the missle guidance system? --Diannaa ^TALK 21:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] If I remember correctly, it's the code used to disarm the missile system. Gage (talk) 02:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] OK. I incorporated it in a general way as I don't know what the code was exactly. I like the way it reads now anyway so I think its ok the way it is. Good luck with your GA nomination. :-)) --Diannaa ^TALK 03:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Re: Family GuyI'll be happy to do the reviews, I do like Family Guy, though I haven't seen it for a while, and I actually gotta do some reviews, cause I got a bunch of nominations over there. Example—for the note on my talkpage—when I put "No Chris Left Behind" on hold, that means not to leave a message that you're done with my concerns, cause I add the reviews to my watchlist, and I see the activity of what's going on. But, since you left me that one message regarding the reviews, it's fine cause we talking about the same thing, so. ;) Also, if you could review "Kidney Now!" it would be most appreciated, cause like you, I'm trying to get the episode's season to GT status and that's the last episode I need for it to be promoted. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Thank you. I've went ahead and reviewed the episode that you noted. Gage (talk) 18:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] FYI, so you know, and not that I would bring into question either of your reviews or submissions, cause I know you are both great editors, and review fairly, but someone brought up a conflict of interest when User:Qst and myself used to review each others GACs. Just a thought. CTJF83 chat 19:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Road to the multiverseHi For now I have just edited the lead which you can see here and compare before and after versions to see my changes [1]. If you agree with the edits and general style I will continue with the rest of the article. Do not feel bad if you think my edits were not along the style you wished: simply revert and ask someone else to have a look. I will not be offended :¬) thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Seems fine to me. Feel free to continue. Gage (talk) 21:39, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Ok no probs - i am just about to watch Futurama though and having a little problem with another editor so maybe in 40 mins or so ? Chaosdruid (talk) 22:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Sure. Gage (talk) 22:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]The second section of the plot was a little tricky to say the least ! Dog Brian and Human stewie I have tried to put as just Brian and Stewie to cut down on the confusing amount of Dog and Human references. The same is true for the universes and at the end of the second para I have used "original universe" to try and differentiate. Most of it was commas which are normally used to add extra info not needed in the sentence. Using that rule it is easiest to read the sentence and skip the bit in commas. If the sentence makes sense then the commas are ok, and if it doesn't we try to rearrange the sentence and use a few commas as possible. I hope I didn't do too badly on that score :¬) K - finished. Have a look and tell me if you think it's ok. I tried to save it often so that you can revert anything you deem to have changed too much or made it incomprehensible :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 01:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]The only mistake I was able to spot was where you changed a sentence to say that Seth Green executive produced the Robot Chicken sequence in the episode, when what I was really saying was that he is the executive producer for the actual Robot Chicken show. Other than that, some of the sentences do seem like run-ons without commas, so I think a second opinion would be beneficial. Or if the sentences can be better rearranged, feel free to take a shot at it, I'll try to correct anything if I find something like what I just mentioned. Gage (talk) 01:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Sorry I didnt see your message till after I posted here. The large amount of commas that were in there were more like a speech where one may need to breath between carrying on. It is true that most people seem to think that short sentences are the only thing peoples brains can cope with - maybe thats true lol but to me there are none that are too long. The Seth Green thing I understand, I think that as you had already mentioned he was the prod of RobotChicken may have been enough, but maybe you could add a little more to the sentence (I assume it was the one in the Cultural references section ?) to point that out again Chaosdruid (talk) 01:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Ah sorry - I just looked at the diffs and I admit complete stupidity in that edit - I did make him into the producer lol - apologies for that Chaosdruid (talk) 01:39, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] No problem. I asked for a second opinion, so hopefully they'll take a look at the article and fix anything else, in regards to the commas, which I can see why some should have been removed. If you know anyone willing to take a look at the article, I'd appreciate it if you could get their opinion on the article, as I am hoping to get it to FA status after the peer review is complete. Gage (talk) 01:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Hey, I saw your request on my talk page and I looked at the article a bit. Did the 2007–2008 Writers Guild of America strike affect the sixth or seventh season? The lead says the sixth and the Production and development section says the seventh season. Just wanted some clarification.Derild4921☼ 15:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Well, it affected both actually, as the sixth season was cut short (and not because their weren't anymore episodes to air), but the seventh season was essentially the conclusion to the sixth season production line. And the eighth season began anew. Gage (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]FG FTDo you need me to watch the commentaries (if there are some), or did you do that? Meet the Quagmires:All the Back to the Future references are unsourced. Also imdb is not a valid reference for Kenny Loggin's song.Boys Do Cry:Is the explanation of Stewie throwing up the wine important? I think "Brian later gets a gun under Texas state law at a liquor store, while buying a bottle of Jack Daniels. Throwing away the gun, it goes off, exciting Brian. He shoots the gun in the air five more times before the Super Devil falls dead to the ground in front of him, with a pool of blood forming around the body. " is probably irrelevant to the plot Not sure the ending, about Peter criticizing people who criticize Family Guy, while funny, is not really important to the plot. Should DVD info be in the Reception section, instead of Production?No Meals on Wheels:Only concern is, as with above, if DVDs should go to Reception.I made minor adjustments on all 3, but want to discuss these with you before I changed them. Let me know if I need to watch the commentaries. CTJF83 chat 18:13, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]I already watched them, and wasn't able to get much out of them. The only article I've concentrated on expanding so far was No Meals on Wheels because it just happened to be on Adult Swim last night. Pretty sure Boys Do Cry is on tonight's and I'll try to get the article put together a little better. And the DVD info should stay in the production section.And as for the references in the cult ref section of Meet the Quagmires, I had nothing to do with it being unsourced, but that episode is on tomorrow I believe, and I wanted to just start from scratch. Gage (talk) 02:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Ok, that's fine, I'll help clean all 3 up. CTJF83 chat 19:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Sorry i was not much help in the articals. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Talkback

Hello, Calibrador. You have new messages at NerdyScienceDude's talk page. Message added 21:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 21:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]family guy season 8 pageI dont have much time to add it myself, but this should be included on the season 8 page as it includes a special from season 8, and the unaired in the USA episode. http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Family-Guy-Partial-Terms-of-Endearment/14026 Grande13 (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Yeah, I've known about that for a couple weeks now. It's already mentioned in the lead though. Gage (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Carte GoodwinRecently, my friend made some edits to the SPLC on my computer, I was trying to be constructive with the pic of Carte Goodwin, though my pic did not go through. Sorry bout it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.199.20 (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Well, I doubt the photo is non-fair use anyway. Gage (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]To quote C-SPAN's own copyright policy, "Although C-SPAN is the only news media organization that regularly televises the legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, it does not hold a copyright in that video coverage. That government-produced video is in the public domain which means that it belongs to the American people and may be used without restrictions of any kind." Regardless of what they state on their page, no one can unilaterally withdraw media from the public domain. harej 05:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Furthermore, C-SPAN's legal threats are usually justified by the unauthorized use of their trademarks. Nothing that could be conceived as C-SPAN property has been uploaded by me to Commons; only federally-produced public domain goodness. harej 06:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#PollingYou are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#Polling. —Markles 10:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]PicturesSuperb job on the Comic-Con pictures. I was interested in going this year, but didn't get a ticket before they sold out. Of course, had I known they were going to have an Expendables panel, I think I would have tried a lot harder. I'll shoot for next year when Expendables 2 comes out. Anyway, nice work on the new images. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Thanks!Just noticed that three articles I wrote (Peter's Progress, The Juice Is Loose and Long John Peter) are good articles. I just didn't think they were worthy of being good articles, so I never nominated them myself. Thanks for nominating them ! :) --Pancake (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Liev SchreiberThanks for replacing that horrific, ghastly, abominable, demonic and simply bad picture of a swollen Liev Schreiber, apparently taken after a bender, with your own. μηδείς (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Your GA nomination of Da BoomThe article Da Boom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are many changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within one week, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 02:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Your GA nomination of Da BoomThe article Da Boom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see the talkpage for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 00:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:We Have a Bad Feeling About This - Family Guy promo.png⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Have a Bad Feeling About This - Family Guy promo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]ImagesThanks again for taking pictures of the Simpsons panel. They are awesome! :) Do you have a list of all the Simpsons-related ones? Theleftorium ^(talk) 13:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]What exactly are you referring to when you say a list of all the-Simpsons related ones? Unfortunately, every year they seem to think 50 minutes of mostly uninformative Q&A is the most entertaining, so this year's panel once again consisted of Groening, Al Jean, Matt Selman, and Mike B. Anderson, as it was last year. So those are the only people I got. Gage (talk) 21:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Although, I did get a picture of David M. Stern during the Ugly Americans panel. Gage (talk) 21:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]GreatHey just noticed that you created the Road to episodes artical, i want to say thanks a a fellow Fg contributor as i am a fan of the series of episodes and no one out of the FG group nacepted it as a series as the treehouse of horror, i would like to now if in the future you wish to get it to a GA as i have some info on the series. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:51, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Certainly, if you can expand the article, pleas--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)e do. Gage (talk) 23:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] hEY this is an idea for the fuyere, futere ok, dose Fg pardoying films count as a hallmark, becuase in an interiew with macfarlanne he said that he was intrested in parodying raiders of the lost ark and wrath of khan. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 09:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] No, I don't think that would count, as that bridge has yet to be crossed. Consideing the only series they've seriously parodied are the Star Wars films, I don't think it can be considered a hallmark. Especially since Robot Chicken has accomplished the same thing. Gage (talk) 10:03, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Could you get on the Simpsons IRC chat thing though real quick? Gage (talk) 10:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] The java thing. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Also its for the futere, so yeah i now its not good now but if they do make indy jones and star trek things it would count so im saying for the futree. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:27, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Yes, the Java thing. And that sounds good to me. Gage (talk) 11:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Gage i cannot go im in another coputer and i am not in my house can you think of another way. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:41, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] When will you be at your house? Gage (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] i am in spain on vacation but im in java i got in go see. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Im back concet. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Gage leave love blacually to me alright. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 06:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Hey gage would it be a bad idea to make an artical for the FG pilot. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd only support that if there was the strong potential of getting it to GA status. I've considered doing that for a while now, though. Gage (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And looking at your sandbox, it just seems to be a carbon copy of Death Has a Shadow, which I'm sure would result in the article being nominated for merging into the Death Has a Shadow article anyway. Gage (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, but i belive some day it could be made, anyway if yor there can you conect. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 16:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Done. Gage (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Could you watch my 2 sandbox and tell me what you think. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 12:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] I think it is a great improvement. I moved Povenmire's photo down a few paragraphs though, as it was a little bit crowded being right next to MacFarlane's, but do feel free to add it to the actual article, as it may better help distinguish it as the hallmark that it is. Gage (talk) 13:15, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Nominated the splendid source, and could you take a look at chitty chitty death bang to tell me if its close to gan. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Also worked on Stew-Roids so check it out. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] gage i would love for you to check out spies recimt me, Buisness guy and 420 i have worked on those and would like your opinion. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Please wait before nominating even more articles. I don't even think Business Guy should have been nominated yet. Simply listing the casting director, the producers, etc. does not create an intriguing production section. That is what the DVD commentary is for, if it is available, and that's what interviews about the episode is for. Please wait a while before nominating any more articles. Gage (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]GA reviewSince you asked me to review some articles, I already did it for No Meals on Wheels (GAR) , but I'll leave to other users to review them. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 20:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Already did most of it. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Thanks to Pedro for facilitate the GAR, I've already passed the nomination , good luck with other nominations. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 17:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]RE: Family Guy GANAlright, seems fare but i am sateing that it is not necesary for articals to have CR as it is seen here Interactions (The Spectacular Spider-Man), A Rugrats Chanukah, Homer the Whopper, just noteing and yeah that episode needs cleaning and could you conect. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Re: "Meet the Quagmires"Consider it done. You know, you can leave me messages if you want me to review something, that I don't mind seeing. ;) You're welcome for the "Boys Do Cry" review, just doing my job. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]FGHello, Gage. It appears my recent edits to the article I Never Met the Dead Man have been reverted. The sources for several of the cultural references appears to be the Family Guy Volume 1 DVD. One question: is the DVD itself considered a reliable source for citing cultural references? Thanks, -Phil Fry (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]CONECThey gage i made this new section for the issue not to cluuter the other one up so can you conect. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:32, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Not sure if you saw my reply CTJF83 chat 03:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] can you conect. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Gage can you Conect please. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Stewie Kills Lois and Lois Kills StewieHey Gage i think of someday geting this to FA, and i really need help with the lead and a bit copyedit. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]The article is nowhere near FA status. Too much work would need to be done. Gage (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Gage plase read, also forgive my rudness in the coment. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Road to... (Family Guy)Excellent scholarly article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Patton OswaltHi - we are the web firm for Patton Oswalt. He has requested that the new picture from comic con not be used on this page. Can you please leave the one he sent us up there? We'd like to avoid reverting it again. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyowhorker (talk • contribs) 17:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]FLCGage i see 8 season and it looks good it could be a futre FLC but first it would need a PR, so tell me if you think so as well i am working on the 1 seaons but as well it needs a PR, but just saying, tell me what youthink. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 09:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]I do not think a peer review is necessary. I would like to expand the article before anything else is done though, and then get someone from the GOCE to copyedit it, specifically the plots, which really need to be cut down by someone who has not seen the episodes. Gage (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] What season are you talking about 8 or 1. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Eight. I'm not involving myself with season one, but I'm glad you and Ctjf83 are taking care of it. Gage (talk) 23:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Alright i nominated the 1 season for PR but its good that we work on it, also baby not on board just passed. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Seth MacFarlaneCome again? I don't appreciate blank reverts of good faith edits. As the atheism article will tell you, atheism is the rejection of belief. How exactly is it a belief system then? Nymf _hideliho! 18:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Any chance you can comment on this? Thanks. Nymf _hideliho! 15:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Re: "Mother Tucker"Sure, I'll take a look at the article, though, didn't Ophois keep the GA status? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Yes, but because I happened to mention that fact in the other article Ophois nominated at GAR, a user from that page decided to add that template, out of seemingly spite, to Mother Tucker. Gage (talk) 21:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Okay, then. I'll look at it tomorrow, cause I got to log off, is that cool? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] That's fine. Gage (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] I added some minor details, hope you don't mind. In the Cultural references section, you should probably say that "D'oh" is a reference to the Homer Simpson character of The Simpsons another Fox show. Overall, the article is good. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Alright, I've done so. If you now believe the article is up to GA standards, could you please remove the {{GA request}} template from the talk page? Gage (talk) 19:24, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Baby Not on BoardIn case you're interested, I've started a reassessment at Talk:Baby Not on Board/GA2.--BelovedFreak 09:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Found ReceptionLOOK i found info for Road to Europe, and fixed it up, it only needs the CRS could you be kind enough to ask CTJ to add them if he can, thank you. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]CONGRATSCongrats here is why. :D --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]The Family Guy (Freaking Sweet)-star To Gage Skidmore a great wikipedian, this is for Road to the Multiverse, for getting it to FA, hope you keep up the good work :] Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 11:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Talkback

Hello, Calibrador. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page. Message added 15:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]Alaska 2010 Gov RaceDo you have a source saying Berowitz won? According to Politico(who gets it's projection's from the AP), no winner has been projected yet, at the moment I am writing it. And the reason I bring up Politico is because as you more then likely know, that where the returns are coming from. Thank you for the work you have done this evening, it has been really hard to keep up with all the numbers and projections, hope I helped as well!! Thanks, America69 (talk) 07:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]2010 Michigan Governor electionI need help on Michigan gubernatorial election, 2010. This rookie editor keeps reverting my edits because he's against the 5% rule. He keeps reverting despite past discussions and majority of consensus.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Road to the MultiverseRoad to the MultiverseJust wanted to say to you, excellent work on this article! -- Cirt (talk) 01:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Thank you. Gage (talk) 03:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] Connected. CTJF83 chat 06:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Signpost articleWould you care to comment on your article, Road to the Multiverse, in reference to Wikipedia:FCDW/3000? As in what your feelings working on the article? Regards, ResMar 23:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Certainly. I was completely and totally unaware of this approaching distinction, and I am very glad to have received this honor. A lot of hard work went into getting the article to featured status, and just knowing that 3,000 other articles, and at least 3,000 other users also went through the same process is inspiring. Gage (talk) 23:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]IRCon it. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Good article reassessment/Hell Comes to Quahog/1Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I undid your closing of the discussion at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hell Comes to Quahog/1 because per the instructions at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment, "discussions which have lasted more than 4 weeks can be closed with no consensus". Although the article was listed more than four weeks ago, the reassessment discussion was started less than four weeks ago.--BelovedFreak 19:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Also, although there don't seem to be any particular instructions about who may or may not close the discussion, given that it's not a clear consensus, it might be better if someone without a vested interest on the outcome closed it. Just a thought... (I wouldn't close it either) --BelovedFreak 20:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]BarnstarThe Tireless Contributor Barnstar Your tireless hard work is essential to wikipedia. Jerzeykydd (talk) 23:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]Articles for deletion nomination of List of Conan episodes

I have nominated List of Conan episodes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Conan episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QuestionDo ytou think it would be a bad idea to make a Quahog artical, comparing it to Springfield (The Simpsons). --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]It's been attempted in the past, including by myself, and I would oppose its creation. Gage (talk) 23:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] You have how did it finish up being, and why? --<fon color="Orange">Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 02:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] I never saved it, I was just toying with it in preview mode, and decided against creating it, based on the AfD, or whatever it was, of the article. Gage (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] I am atempting to get it at par with SPringfieled you can see on one of my sandboxes the version i made put now i am not sure to even publish it. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 02:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] I am also intrested in helping you get FG episodes to FA(fact i was gonna ask ya if you wanted to get to FLC in about 2 weeks) so if i can help out just tell me. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 02:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] I would still oppose its creation. For now. In a couple years, when it becomes more distinct, like Springfield is, having existed for twenty seasons, then it can be created. I'm not saying we need to wait another decade, but just when it becomes a larger part of the series' distinction. It'd be sort of like creating an article for Stoolbend, Virginia or Langley Falls, Virginia. Gage (talk) 03:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Maybe wait until the movie comes out? --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 03:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] If it is as relevant as Springfield was in The Simpsons' movie. Gage (talk) 03:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Hope so anyway back to the question of the episodes. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 03:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] You don't just decide to try to get an article to FA... Information has to be made available in great quantity. Partial Terms of Endearment and Extra Large Medium have potential, but neither have been released on DVD as of yet. Gage (talk) 03:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] OH HELL, MY BAD, FORGET WHAT YOU READ UP THERE WHAT I MEANT WAS: I saw you put the FG episodes to FL and i really wanna help here(fact i was gonna ask ya if you wanted to get to FLC in about 2 weeks) so if i can help out just tell me. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 03:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Alright. Gage (talk) 03:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Thank you sorry for the misspell. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 03:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]RE:IRCconcected. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]RE:FLCAlright sorry for the burden. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 00:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]Was changeinhg it to that format, but changed it in the last minute, i will kepp FG page like that if you do not mind, hope the FLC works out. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 00:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] That's fine, just don't use it in other articles. Use the "XXXX-XX-XX" format. Gage (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Yes, yes i did. Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 06:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]Happy GageSkidmore's Day!GageSkidmore has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as GageSkidmore's Day! For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian, enjoy being the star of the day, GageSkidmore! Signed, Neutralhomer A record of your Day will always be kept here.For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]WikiProject Conan O'BrienI've noticed you have started the Conan O'Brien WikiProject. Does this WikiProject to do with the coverage of Conan O'Brien? JJ98 (Talk) 11:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]IRCWould you mind connecting to IRC briefly, it is very important. Please write on my talkpage when you have connected. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 03:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]Sorry, I was gone all day. I can connect later in the day tomorrow though. Gage (talk) 06:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]NiceNice job, with the creation of WP:COCO. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]Excellence in Broadcasting has been placed on holdHello, I have reviewed the article and it has been placed on hold. There a few issues to be dealt with, but I will allow seven days for thos issues to be fixed. Thanks. -- Matthew RD 21:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]QueryPlease see disruption at {{Conan O'Brien}} by multiple IPs, would appreciate your input at the Template talk:Conan O'Brien. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 02:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]File:Iowa Gubernatorial Election Results by County, 2010.svgI don't understand .svg, can you fill in the colors? [2] thanks, CTJF83 chat 03:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]FLC and ACCESSAs a regular at FLC, I'd like to draw your attention to ongoing discussion here about changes to the format of tables which will affect all existing FLs and all current and future FLCs. Your input would be welcome. Thanks for your contributions so far! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:A Cleveland Brown Christmas - Promo.png⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Cleveland Brown Christmas - Promo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Cleveland Brown Jr. PicMy computer isn't working right, can you get a pic of skinny Jr from Family Guy from a screenshot for comparative purposes? CTJF83 chat 19:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Love Rollercoaster - The Cleveland Show promo.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Love Rollercoaster - The Cleveland Show promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Ladies Night - The Cleveland Show promo.png⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ladies Night - The Cleveland Show promo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Comic Con PhotosI love your 2010 Comic Con photos - nice work! I first noticed them on the Always Sunny in Philadelphia cast articles. --David Shankbone 00:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Thank you! It is an honor. Gage (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Family Guy Volume 8 - DVD box cover.png⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Family Guy Volume 8 - DVD box cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]fg episode listWhat is the advantage of having the main episode list NOT link to the season pages? It just makes sure everything is correct between the two, and it is easier to spot errors/vandalism, as well as making it easier for edits. Grande13 (talk) 13:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Your claim that it is easier to spot errors and vandalism is irrelevent. There have been no difficulties in monitoring either. Additionally, multiple users at FLC have requested that a ratings column be added to the season eight article, as the information is readily available. This information is not available for most of the early seasons, and would make the list inconsistent. The article is fine the way it is. Gage (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] the ratings info can go at the bottom of the season page then to fix that situation. Please dont revert main list until a discussion is had.Grande13 (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]BSThe Original Barnstar Too often great editors like you are overlooked and not given the credit deserved for all their great contributions. So I am awarding you this barnstar to let you know I greatly appreciate all you do for Wikipedia, and please keep up the outstanding work!! CTJF83 chat 03:16, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Your GA nomination of Partial Terms of EndearmentHello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Partial Terms of Endearment you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Viriditas (talk) 07:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]FYI...this article is looking pretty good, but I'm having trouble reaching the Digital Spy links. It's telling me the page is down due to server maintenance, so I expect it will be back up shortly. I'll have more to say on the review page later. Viriditas (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Your GA nomination of Partial Terms of EndearmentThe article Partial Terms of Endearment you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Partial Terms of Endearment for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Viriditas (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Good job on the article! Viriditas (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Conan (TV series)Hi. I get that you've put a lot of work into this article and that you are passionate about the subject, and the show. However, now that the show has premiered, and it is clear what the show's format entails, there is enough information out there to remove most of the information that is duplicated in 2010 Tonight Show conflict. I understand how it may feel that a lot of your hard work is grounds to be deleted now, but the time is now. Milchama (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Continue to revert me, and I will gladly report you to WP:3RR. I do not know why you believe you have any right to remove any information from the article, especially without consensus, but your understanding of creating a well researched article, and continually claiming that a show that has been on for three weeks is somehow established is absurd. Gage (talk) 21:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Family Guy (season 8)/archive1Hi Gage, have you addressed Giants' comments in the above FLC? If so, please leave a note at the nomination page so Giants knows to revisit. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]I will look over his concerns as soon as I can. Gage (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Proposed deletion of New Kidney in TownThe article New Kidney in Town has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:per WP:CRYSTALWhile all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 21:34, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Nomination of New Kidney in Town for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article New Kidney in Town, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Kidney in Town until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion. You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 04:32, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]HelloHi GageSkidmore, hope you're well. As an editor who has used the services of the Guild of Copy Editors, I thought you might be interested in knowing that the Guild is currently holding elections for its coordinators. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit the election page. Thanks! Lunalet (talk) 10:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Hannah BananaHi Gage, I will be reviweing the HB article for GA criteria. Please follow-up with the review page Talk:Hannah Banana/GA1. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]FG season 5GTC? Nergaal (talk) 23:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]I'd support it, but I'd really like to avoid what happened last time. Gage (talk) 23:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Main page appearanceHello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on December 24, 2010. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 24, 2010. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbh®tch^Talk ^© Happy Holidays 00:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]"Road to the Multiverse" is the first episode of the eighth season of the animated comedy series Family Guy. Directed by Greg Colton and written by Wellesley Wild, the episode originally aired on Fox in the United States on September 27, 2009. In "Road to the Multiverse", two of the show's main characters, baby Stewie and anthropomorphic dog Brian, who are voiced by series creator Seth MacFarlane (pictured), use an "out-of-this-world" remote control to travel through a series of various parallel universes. They eventually end up in a world where dogs rule and humans obey. This causes Brian to become reluctant to return home to his own universe, and he ultimately ends up breaking the remote, much to the dismay of Stewie, who soon seeks a replacement. The "Road to" episodes which have aired throughout various seasons of Family Guy were inspired by the Road to... comedy films starring Bing Crosby, Bob Hope and Dorothy Lamour, though this episode was not originally conceived as a "Road to" show. Critical responses to the episode were mostly positive; critics praised its storyline, numerous cultural references, and its use of various animation styles. (more...)Marlin StutzmanHi, any reason for you to make his starting date January? He's been a member since November. Please always leave an edit summary. Hekerui (talk) 10:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]My apologies, it completely crossed my mind that he'd already taken office. I was cleaning up all the new member's pages, and had instictively assumed it was just vandalism. Please revert if you have not already. Gage (talk) 10:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Peter Griffin New Kidney in Town ArticleI need assistance adding the reference to the Madonna's Ray of Light video in the article in an appropriate way. Since you sited WP:OR I found this youtube video showing http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xRZlT8EMyWo#t=24s him singing the song and this Madonna video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY. Thanks for your help.YouTube cannot be used as a reference. Gage (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]Please assist in adding an appropriate reference in the appropriate way. Thanks.