If you leave a message here, I will respond on your talk page,unlessI perfectly know you are watching this page.
Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's fair enough. I have never asked Lego to do a GA for me in return for stuff i've review etc. and I didnt pick Pre-Madonna in the hope of getting Lego to do me a favour. Admittedly yes Lego has had some input into my FA nomination of When Love Takes Over, as in he participated in the peer review but has not commented on the FA nomination page, though he has been explaining some of the concerns of other editors to me. But other than that I didn't really see it as an issue. I will bare it in mind in future though. Just to clarify I am personally of the opinion that GA swaps are not a good idea. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1[talk]04:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This edit slightly broke the main {{jct}} template. You inserted the semi template, but on a new line, which inserted a line break into every transclusion of the subtemplate. No big deal, but I thought that I'd let you know for future reference to put the <noinclude> right after the last element of a template. Thanks for adding the template though. Imzadi 1979→21:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I would consider it reliable. Including the fact that it is a "website for kids, mostly Tweens, kids ages 9 - 14," which means it's articles are written for that audience, which also includes a portion of the audience who could read the article here on wikipedia. I would like to include it in the article, because it gives a great insight into the song and would help improve the "Critical Reception" portion... But it's more of a question like "is the site professional enough to include on the article without making it a joke?" Theuhohreo (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I didn't know there was a bot that updated those article histories, as I'd always done it myself in the past, with no negative repercussions. How does the bot know when to update the template? —Torchiesttalkedits23:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What you mentioned said not to manually update when the FAC closes. I don't think it's problematic to update the status beforehand, since the bot can still update it when the FAC is completed. Also, the article is now showing as both a FAC and a former FAC. I'd like to undo your change to fix that. It's not that big of a deal, is it? —Torchiesttalkedits23:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I swear Axel if I knew that this was going to be a monster, I would have made it my priority to develop it before my marriage. My editing rate has slowed down so much. By the way, have you noticed this terrible IP destroying every article on music? — Legolas(talk2me)05:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm scared of taking this to FA. They will probably rip it apart. That's why BR is teh safer bet. As for the IP, dont worry, an admin blockd his ass. — Legolas(talk2me)06:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism: Beagle 2 page
Could you please take a look at the developing situation on this page, 1st paragraph. I and Valhalan are attempting to reinstate the original text of this para, which is both more professional and more informative than the less-clear and less illuminating text which Ruslik0 is trying to replace it with.
On the Discussion page I have given my detailed reasons for the reinstatement. However, Ruslik0 is responding by not only trying to reinstate his inferior version, without citing any reasons whatsoever, but also trying to get me suspended "for Vandalism"!!!
This action of Ruslik0 is of course the ultimate in vandalism-- to abuse the mechanism for dealing with vandals, and then actually use it as a vandal's tool.
Could you please examine the matter.
Thankyou
(204.112.54.106 (talk) 04:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC))
NB Ruslik0 is particularly misleading in 2 key areas. First, the clear possibility that Beagle 2 missed Mars has been deleted by him (no reason given). Second, his misleading term "failed to make ground contact" in many English speaking countries, and to many foreigners whose English is not good, means "failed to Land".
I have warned Ruslik0 about his vandalistic attitude, but he has not heeded said warning.[reply]
Please see my Talk Page 72.128.202.20 (talk) 07:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism?
It looks like you're on vandalism patrol at the moment, which is a good thing, but I would consider taking another look at this edit. Yes, it was correct to revert the edit, but I'm pretty sure he didn't intentionally want to disrupt the article, which is what vandalism is all about. He is new to Wikipedia and might not understand the rules, so I decided to give him a welcome message and a talkinarticle message too. Minimac (talk) 07:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Never Miss a Super Bowl Club
I left a commentary on the talk page about the picture. I'd wonder if free images of all four members individually even exist, and, as noted, there is an exemption for BLP non-free photos when it depicts a specific event unlikely to recur, I believe. - The BushrangerOne ping only04:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Harry Belafonte
Hello! Perhaps you could help me with something. I am enrolled in a college English course at Minneapolis Community and Technical College. One of our assignments is to research and improve a Wikipedia song article in an effort to make worthy of being a Featured Article. This was the article I was given. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and even though I have read through the policies and procedures pages, I am unsure of how to have the article unprotected. I think I did everything right. Would you be willing to consider my request or provide additional guidance as to how I can complete my assignment? Thanks! Boris n' Bosko (talk) 03:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have to say at first glance his complaints appear to have merit; it seems he is blocked for socking, but that the original block was unfair and his socking was within policy. Egg Centric (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How do I make a complaint against this user? He's consistently rude to people for no reason, and overrules anything he doesn't see fit, which is extremely tiresome. 81.100.21.62 (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking over my shoulder (if that's what you were doing). There was a "subtopic" parameter that I copied from the GANomination template which seemed odd to me as well. Would you mind looking at what I did there in promoting the article to see if I screwed anything up? Thanks! Dr Aaij (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Spanish people and Wikipedia wide issue about ethnicity
Hello, I was the one who changed the number of Spanish people in Spain to Unknown. This is not something subjective, the figure being wrong is a fact and the references are there. If this is something that should be discussed, I feel that it would make more sense that in the meanwhile it is left as Unknown instead of having a wrong figure, specially since I feel it will be largely ignored. I've also seen that the article Swedes has the same problem as the one for Spaniards, the number of ethnic Swedes is wrong. Many more articles might have this issue.
Also as I see that you are a well established Wikipedia editor, I would like to let you know about the Wikipedia wide issue of ethnicity percentage. In the section Ethnicity in the article for Germany it says 91% German, this word German links to the article Germans which is not about ethnic Germans but German nationals. 91% is in fact the percentage of German nationals, a great percentage of these aren't ethnic Germans, e.g Turks. There is a wrong figure in the page of almost every European country I checked. You can't provide the real figures since these countries don't keep track of ethnicity. One can't even provide a valid source for an estimation of these numbers.
I suggest doing a major revision of all these articles, either substituting the percentage/figure for Unknown or removing the ethnicity section. Wikipedia can't leave it the way it is now because it can mislead people.
Something less important but that I think I should note is that the articles are inconsistent. "French people" is NOT about ethnic French. "Spanish people" IS about ethnic Spaniards. "Swedish people" which redirects to "Swedes" IS about ethnic Swedes. "German people" which redirects to "Germans" is NOT about ethnic Germans, etc...
Thanks for the welcome...I've been on here for over three years, but thanks, regardless. That said, the other user did not cite sources correctly. In addition, the very first NYT statement was deleted. The other statements were kept, but that user should provide a convincing argument for why they deleted it. Regardless, I'm more concerned about the references, where correctly cited sources help maintain the article's FA status. I maybe should have approached the matter in a different way, but the user's edits should be reverted. Now, since I am at the three-edit threshold I will hold my edit until tomorrow, but you of all people should understand the importance of correctly citing a source. Thank you. BalticPat22Patrick (talk) 05:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the IP user just violated the revert rule. Should I give them a free pass on that as well because they're an IP user? I don't want to begin an argument, but users should know how to cite sources correctly, regardless if they're an IP user or not (which I find to be completely ridiculous). That said, I already had to correct grammar, unlinked sources, and correct translations from French to English (which is nearly impossible to do completely correctly). I also re-added the entire deleted New York Times statement that the IP user deleted without providing any explanation. Lastly, the user's using books as references, which is fine. I just don't think they should delete a source that's readily available to dissect with one that's not as "available." Your tone doesn't need to be as edgy, either. I acknowledged my mishandling of the IP user, but I do not regret the actions I took. Lastly, I truly appreciate all you do for this article, and I hope that something this trivial doesn't change anything.BalticPat22Patrick (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
spam?
1 - How can you class a relevant historical site as "spam"?
2 - please do not delete messages, it only makes you look bad.
I understand and applaud your efforts to keep people from using Wikipedia to advertise their business(like what has happened to sites such as you tube), but the link I added is not advertising/spam. these are places and things that no longer exist.
CE/BCE usage for Maya stelae was not against any portion of the WP:MOS that I could find. If I am wrong, please point me to the correct information. I apologize if I am, but I believe I am not wrong in using CE/BCE for the article. - 205.167.124.179 (talk) 02:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was deleted, of course, due to me asking for its deletion :D Is the article better now? I mean, I added some info, and split the sections. – Novice7 (talk) 06:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, I take a free-day, so I have not checked many things, excepting this embarrassing typo, thanks BTW. I'll check it later, if there's something to be fixed, I'll comment you. Tbhotch* ۩۞06:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. And, considering Halo, nobody would've noticed it, as the article is amusing and beautifully written. Amazing job on Halo Tbhotch! – Novice7 (talk) 06:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That is kinda funny (that nobody noticed it) =D It was a very small typo though, maybe that's why. And, thank you so much! I'm so happy to hear that my editing quality has improved :) – Novice7 (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi my friend, i hope you are in good health. While searching for Knowles' live performances yesterday, i fell on this Beyonce performing Halo live. It was so emotional. She is a true vocalist. Jivesh • Talk2Me04:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You have protected the wrong version, please correct it. Robert De Niro Sr.'s father was Italian-American and not Arbëresh (Albanian). Unfortunately, there is a video fragment on YouTube which has been completely misunderstood by many albanians who are now vandalizing a lot of wikipedia pages about Robert De Niro's origins. This is the video about De Niro's interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clIUE4SRDd8 and this is what many albanians think he stated: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zVT2eipw4E (they think that he told about his albanian origins...) Thank You in advance78.12.110.111 (talk) 07:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I noticed about that user's "plagarism" (how I hate the CC-SA license) thanks to the images I use, and s/he and another user did the same time ago, but currently it is no more. In part fun, in part obnoxious. Tbhotch* ۩۞05:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'm waiting for the album's release, and a music video so that I can expand it more. I'll surely contact you. Thanks again Tbhotch! — Novice7 (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
With the Oscars now over, I've now begun the harsh and painstaking process of added more info and cleaning the article up. I'm adding a critical reviews section of the Oscar ceremony (since there is a lot of bad ones). Do you have any tips on how to keep it neutral.
I noticed your notifications regarding a couple of my FAs. Unfortunately User:Tiptoety is repeatedly blocking me at the moment so it's difficult for me to log in. I've also been briefly stalked by User:Risker, which was frightening to say the least.
I'm VERY sorry I missed Battle of Musa Qala on the main page. That involves real people, real deaths, and on-going difficulties.
But some of the administrators are really scary people these days and I hestitate to contribute to the site.
In all the vandal reverting some wires got crossed and I think I overwrote your addition of the protection template. Can you double check and make sure I didn't break something? Millahnna (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Berlin Wall
I read the citation page. No citation needed cuz it says "This requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations." Please put my edit back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghbvgy (talk • contribs) 05:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I was wondering if you are able (or interested) in contributing photos of places in and around Mexico City? WhisperToMe is looking for some photos of buildings in DF, and I only know of a couple of editors in the area. I rarely get up that way now that I can fly international out of Oaxaca. Saludos --nsaum75!Dígame¡08:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the photo requests:
Volaris headquarters - Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 490 piso 1 Col. Santa Fe Peña Blanca México DF, Delegación Álvaro Obregón C.P. 0121
Interjet headquarters - Prado Sur 230, First Floor, Colonia Lomas de Chapultepec, CP 11000, Mexico City, D.F. - Map
Secretariat of Public Security headquarters - Avenida Constituyentes 947, Ex Hacienda de Belem, Deleg. Alvaro Obregón. C.P. 01110. Ciudad de México
Aeromar headquarters - Hangar 7, Zona "D", Terminal de Aviacion General, Col Federal, Mexico DF, 15620, Mexico"
Aviacsa headquarters - Hangar 1, Zona "C", Col. Aviación Gral. [...] Aeropuerto Int. de la Cd. de México. C.P. 15520
And if you are willing to go to the Toluca area, there is:
Federal Social Readaptation Center No. 1 (Prison) - Santa Juana, Almoloya de Juárez, State of Mexico (Only get the main entrance sign - While there is one as seen in this document it may be best to get a sign that you see when first going into the compound, as I understand that prison authorities may not permit you to actually enter the compound) - If it is not possible to get a photo of the sign, please let me know and I will try to use the photo in the SSP document as a fair use photo, citing that it is not possible to get a representative photo of the prison
Alternatively I could e-mail the prison authorities and see if they are willing to relicense that photo and/or produce a free photo
Have you seen the Gwen Stefani perfume commercials? I could care less about the fragrance, but I like singing a long to her songs that it seems everyone has forgotten. --ĈÞЯİŒ1ооо17:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Assistance with editor
Since you've edited many album article, I'd like to ask for help with a troublesome editor, Markelmitchell, who makes unconstructive edits to album articles on a daily basis, specifically to track listings by adding boldface, small scripts, and other unexplained, unnecessary changes, such as to In My Own Words. I've posted warnings at his talk page, but he has not gotten the message. Would you help in any way? Dan56 (talk) 02:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly the same three weeks ago, excepting that my userpage was attacked 20 times, including some death thrats of my British fan, and it is now move-protected, Grawp's PSP is broken, so he's having fun moving pages again. Anyway, nothing new with me. And we'll see you in May, take care. Tbhotch* ۩۞06:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion. It is not a Wikipedia policy. I do not obey essays. Tbhotch* ۩۞06:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have a response to that, but in the interests of remaining as civil as possible, I will withhold my remarks and simply tell you that I don't appreciate being templated. In the future, if you have a concern with one of my edits, please do me a simple courtesy and leave a brief, more personal, message. Have a nice evening, sir. Strikerforce (talk) 06:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, except for the fact that I did nothing worth being templated over. Here are my edits to that article[3][4] and [5]. How did that warrant a template message on my talk page? The only thing that you even remotely could have templated me for was a result of someone else's mistake in an edit that I reverted to, in the interest of the information in that edit being accurate.Strikerforce (talk) 06:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. This is a pretty stupid discussion to be having. My point is, I believe you acted too quickly and in error by templating a regular which, essay as it may be, is a practice that is not done by a majority of the users with whom I've interacted. I'm not thrilled about it, but it's small stuff and they say that you shouldn't sweat the small stuff. Have a good night, sir. Strikerforce (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
public markets, mercados públicos or what?
I am working on a general article about mercados públicos/mercados municipales for English WP.... and Im trying to decide whether to name it Mercados públicos (Mexico), Mexican public markets or what. Got an opinion?Thelmadatter (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a big priority (I agree with the reversions), but I'd like a few examples. I doubt it's actually CharlieJS13: he edits using a DSL line out of British Telecom. This editor is also British, but using a different network. It's not Greenock125, either. —Kww(talk) 19:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
About Diner Dash and all Dash of the game series
Hi, I want to add link to Diner Dash page and other but semi-protected, then I seen at page history and you are the last editor, now can you help me add link to page???
I have become aware of your notifications to major contributors of forthcoming TFA appearances on the Main Page, which looks to be a useful service. I wonder whether you might copy such a note to the talk page of the articles involved, so that anyone with the page on their watchlist will be aware: I am prompted to this by recent discussion at Talk:Thoroughbred. I guess sometimes the main contributor cannot be easily identified, or might be on a wikibreak. Kevin McE (talk) 22:18, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ANI / Assistance w/editor
Pertaining to my previous post to you, I made a post at WP:ANI concerning user Markelmitchell, after another editor's response to my report of the user at WP:AVI. Here's the "ANI-notice" that the ANI noticeboard said to post to anyone in the discussion, if you'd like to add something. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit summary
Hello... while I do regret (and apologize for) inadvertently undoing your rearranging of the template order at Basketball, I also feel quite strongly that your edit summary - "Thanks for your rollback missuse" - was out of line and rather inappropriate. Even the most cursory examination of my edits to the article tonight would have clearly indicated that they were in good faith and beneficial. In future, please just leave a note on my talk page to draw my attention to any inadvertent errors, instead of making snide comments in edit summaries. --Ckatzchatspy04:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nate Dogg
Not sure you would see this on my talk page, so I included here for your convenience:
I disagree with your interpretation of my comment. I was not attacking any users in particular (therefore no personal attacks) but the fascist regime that requires me to sign-in to pay proper tribute to a great artist now lost. That is to say, if such restrictions were not arbitrarily placed on this "sum of all human knowledge" then my constructive contributions would be made directly to the article and not the discussion page (as outlined in the "Be Bold" section of the Wikipedia Welcome). Further, if there were to be a personal attack made, I would call into question your ability to logically reason and command the English language as you want me to "rephrase [my] comment as a civil criticism of the article" when there were no criticisms of anything but the article present in my comment; simply that the article had a minor misspelling that I would have liked to have fixed but could not due to restrictions imposed by "someone else". And even then, if I were to make such statements about your frivolous and vulgar abuses of power, I would argue that it my saying so would be less of a personal attack and more of an observation of circumstances. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.55.118.152 (talk) 06:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
sorry sorry sorry...
...I didn't mean for you to have to clean up after me with all the pp-semi templates; I was just trying to stay on top of the IP and meant to come back and add them after. Cheers for that, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots20:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adding LGBT project to GNAA talk
Are you sure it is a good idea to add the LGBT studies to the GNAA talk page? I will defer to your judgment on it, but I just wanted to bring it to your attention that it may not be the best move in light of the nature of the group. Monty84503:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The most insulting here is "a bunch of nerds" (written by a geek BTW). Anyway if I where you I would not reply, I'd remove it, it seems to be a random forum comment. Tbhotch* ۩۞08:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Time to go to bed, if you see him/her returning to forum-kind comments and/or attacking people again, contact an admin. Tbhotch* ۩۞08:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the following numbers:182.177.161.219, 182.177.194.23. Somebody on these numbers continuously vandalising on pages like: Derawali ,Riyasati, Jangli etc. One of these two numbers you already have warned. Please stop this person or numbers. Can these pages be saved?--Khalid Mahmood (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
About vandalism on your user page.
Hello there Tbhotch.I am Damirgraffiti.I would like to remind you that an IP user vandalized your user page.Don't worry though.We've been able to revert back to the way it was.One of the warners also reported the IP user to the Administrators.He's blocked, so he can't vandalize your user page.Check your page history for more info.--Damirgraffiti (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Help Needed! Vandal!
Hi! Are you an Administrator or able to ban Vandals? If so, could you please look at the developing situation on the Robert Falcon Scott article, where I am trying to introduce accurate text, but it is being deleted without reason or explanation by Ruhrfisch. I have warned him , but no use. Thankyou. (204.112.57.130 (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Sorry to involve you in this - the IP has already earned a 3RR block. I am an admin, but am reluctant to block him or her as I am involved in the dispute. Ruhrfisch><>°°02:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
HAlo
The FAC brought up a query about researching print sources. Here are a few scanned magazines you might wanna take a look at (not sure how relevant): [6][7] (I can't view this one) [8] (Jivesh might be able to help you with French) [9] and [10] (in German). Good luck with the FAC!! :D Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article is only about that she knelt down in Australia 10 October 2009 to sing "Halo" to a girl she brought onstage. Barely 3 lines. Do you still want me to translate it? Jivesh • Talk2Me16:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To tell you frankly, editors at FAC are too demanding. The composition section is already great. By the way, i do not think he was talking about the composition section only. He wanted to verify if the article contains all the information that can be found on it on reliable sources. Just tell him a YES. Jivesh • Talk2Me16:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wait i just figured out what he means. I think that he wants more information on recording and production (of course only if there is) and the information should not be from magazines. I will try find some. Jivesh • Talk2Me16:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are most welcome. This is the least i can do after that you have helped me so much in the past.
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For supporting me, keeping me company, believing me, and for being my friend. And kind as well as patient, obviously. I would not have acquired such good editing skills without your your help. Thanks! Jivesh • Talk2Me16:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for telling me that. You are a true friend. I really wanted to give you that barn-star. I will keep on posting links. I have not finished. Jivesh • Talk2Me17:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I will continue my research tomorrow. i am going to bed for now. By the way, i hope you know that the new single of Beyonce is coming out in April 2011? Jivesh • Talk2Me17:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my God. I am happy that she did not really sang like this. It was a false (tricked) tape only. If she starts singing like that, that would be a complete disaster. You are most welcome. See you tomorrow. Jivesh • Talk2Me17:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
@Novice, neither iTunes or Amazon are "unreliable", and you had to argue otherwise. Neither source is unreliable unless it has a characteristic listed here or it is blacklisted. Here, Nikki argued that Yahoo! "blog" is unreliable because of the use of the word "blog", I denoted her that this was not true at all, so you have to do two things a) Defend the article the most you can and b) Still being flexible about reviewers.
Hope you have read my message above. Tbhotch, i want to ask you something but i am a bit scared. Please do not get me wrong. You count a lot for me, more than you think. I mean that you are a very good friend on Wikipedia and everyone here on Wikipedia is like my second family. What i want to ask is that, are you sure Nathan vandalize your talk-page? I mean, don't you suspect someone else... Someone with whom you had a fight, other than Nathan. Please do not be angry Tbhotch. I just wanted to ask. I know you consider me as a good friend (I saw it here and i feel very happy to be in that short list) and i do not want to lose your friendship. Try to think about what i told you with a cool mind. Trust me, you are not the only one to have had problems with Nathan. I have suffered from kind of a fate (February 11, 2011 but was not so serious). I am not taking his side. I just want you both to clear your misunderstandings (if there is any). I am telling you once again my friend, i left you this message with a good intention. Try to think about it. I will wait patiently. Jivesh • Talk2Me12:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For the first point, I believe I'll request a copy-edit, could you recommend me one? I remember an user has helped you before with those things. For the second, as I said at his SPI, I like to know why an IP vandaiize my page. I immediately recognize if I already know that user, for example, if this IP starts with 86.xxx.... I know he is CharlieJS13 (talk·contribs), but this IP has nothing to do with me (apparently) until I saw his edits to Theuhohreo page. You better than no one knows that he has done nothing to no one. Peter argued he never had contact with him, but he is in the same Wikiproject that Nathan used to participate. After I saw that the IP comes from Miami, I first thought in him, but well, I was not sure until I saw that "I come from Miami Beach", and all fit. I'm not angry with this Jivesh, and in some measure an indef block (which is not the same as infinite) is excessive, but a kind of action had to be done he has a long-term sockpuppetry abuse. According to the SPI, he was caught on the IP autoblock, so, I have nothing to say about this. Tbhotch* ۩۞19:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, just wanted to know why There Are Rules got a C rating. (This sounds like a bitchy "This article deserves better than this!" post, but trust me, it's not.) It has a fair deal of prose and sources already, but I trust your judgement. Mostly I'm interested in what you feel I can do to fix it up going forward. Thanks! Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 19:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He wasn't in the film that IP added: this user has caused a major problem creating fake characters and assigning actors to them. I'm having a hell of a time cleaning up after his considerable messes, and I don't want to screw up your table on that page. Could you remove that film from his filmography? I'd appreciate it :> Doctalk08:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, unless you read the sources, you won't know whether or not they have valuable information you might need, be it about the songwriting or recording or promotion of the record. It's up to you to determine if those sources have something you might need or if all there is is just miscellany--my main concern was to make sure you you can exhausted all source options before we proceed further during the FAC process. If you still need to research sources, I suggest withdrawing the FAC at this point. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
His block has been shortened after he confessed and agreed not to repeat. Can you explain to me what is going on? What is he so angry with you about?—Kww(talk) 21:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tbhotch, I don't want to bother you, but I'd like to make a question, if you don't mind. Portuguese naming convention is the same as in the United States: the first name is the given name, then (usually) comes the surname of his mother and lastly the father's surname. Why an explanation in the article, then? Regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that, but does that means that we will have to add this kind of note to every single article about a Brazilian or a Portuguese? --Lecen (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I think you protect the article Travers Island, New York but am not sure why. The page had many mistakes which were ultimately corrected and then removed repeatedly without proper cause. The article currently reads that Travers Island is located in New York Harbor which is false; that the island is part of New York City which is false; and that the island is adjacent to Glen, Neptune and Hunter Islands in New York City's Pelham Bay Park which is false as well. Travers island is in the city of New Rochelle in Westchester County; the island is located in the lower harbor of New Rochelle; the island is situated between the New Rochelle mainland and Glen Island & Neptune Island (which are both part of New Rochelle as well) AND the island is adjacent to the New York City / Westchester border ( and therefore merely in close proximity to Hunter Island and Pelham Bay Park which are in NYC ). Perhaps you can correct these errors so that the article is accurate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.255.164.75 (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
'Travers Island' article errors
Hi. I think you protect the article Travers Island, New York but am not sure why. The page had many mistakes which were ultimately corrected and then removed repeatedly without proper cause. The article currently reads that Travers Island is located in New York Harbor which is false; that the island is part of New York City which is false; and that the island is adjacent to Glen, Neptune and Hunter Islands in New York City's Pelham Bay Park which is false as well. Travers island is in the city of New Rochelle in Westchester County; the island is located in the lower harbor of New Rochelle; the island is situated between the New Rochelle mainland and Glen Island & Neptune Island (which are both part of New Rochelle as well) AND the island is adjacent to the New York City / Westchester border ( and therefore merely in close proximity to Hunter Island and Pelham Bay Park which are in NYC ). Perhaps you can correct these errors so that the article is accurate?
