I used the cool wp:catscan3 tool today to identify what turns out to be 255 wp:Canada articles having outgoing dablinks, and hooked up its output to repeatedly apply editor dispenser's equally cool DabSolver tool to yield the following list, all teed up for you to click and fix, if you're familiar with the article's topic and/or the specific term that links to a disambiguation page.
CatScan is a powerful tool to find articles meeting simple or complex criteria. DabSolver's tool reviews any page to find ambiguous terms and help you fix them. Usually you would cut-and-paste in an the article name into DabSolver, and you only have to pick which target the term should be linked to, from a drop down menu, as long as the intended target is given as an option on the disambiguation page. Here I have set it up so you can just select the article you'd like to review, and DabSolver will be applied to it. DabSolver usually works. It just can't detect sometimes when the ambiguous term is hidden inside a template call. Clear the ambiguous link by finding the more precise link intended (usually an existing article, but sometimes it's appropriate for the term to be a redlink where an article is needed), or by unlinking the term. It's even more of a contribution, if you see there's a gap at the disambiguation page and you can add a bluelink or a proper red-link (a redlink needs a supporting bluelink, see DAB page guideline MOS:DABRL). wp:The Daily Disambig shows the overall project's progress. It would be great to see the Canada articles get struck off wp:DPL's big working list! TIA for any help. :) sincerely, --doncram 03:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
clearing Canada's dablinks
List of 255 below per 17 August running of this CatScan query on Canada's dablinks (to run it again, hit "Do it" at bottom; scroll down to see results below the query)
Someone has been busy...the number actually remaining is down to 234, per re-run of that query, though relatively few of those have been marked as cleared, below. So sometimes if you click on one of the 255 listed below, the reason will be that DabSolver can't find the ambiguous link hidden in a template call, but now more often it will be because the ambiguous link has already been cleared. --doncram 13:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to note that I've also come across a few cases in this list where a {{dn}} template was, for no apparent reason, still sitting as an unnecessary leftover on a link that had already been corrected months or years ago. So that's also something I would recommend checking for if you hit a link where DabSolver says there's nothing — check the article to see if there's still a ghost tag sitting on a term that's already correctly disambiguated or entirely unlinked. Bearcat (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Total is now 204. --doncram 14:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion: Avoid any wasted time by setting up two windows side by side or overlapping. I.e., open a 2nd window on your screen with this same URL, and then run the CatScan query in that. Scroll down in that so its current results, a list of the articles which still need fixing, are showing (in a column on the left side of the window). Returning to this window, select an article to fix only if you can also see it in the current CatScan results. I'm not going to bother striking out any more here. I fixed a few but others must be proceeding along too: total is now 194. --doncram 00:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Count is now 155. --doncram 01:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
List of 255 items in a scrolling box (replaced by list of 132, below.)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
(cs-37) Crosby_Heights_Public_School (Cleared by assuming skipping sport is Skipping rope, by far the most likely meaning, though "citation needed" tag added to question whether this is really a continuing, inter-school competitive sport)
99 remaining. "nicer list of 132" is where you go to pick a page to disambiguate, and is working well. 3/4 chance the first one you click will need disambiguating. Thank you to User:PKT for keeping going with disambiguating. I've noticed that many of these are not super-easy to disambiguate. For example to clear Nova Central School District the drop-down menu did not offer the correct choice. It required creating a proper redlink Phoenix Academy (Newfoundland) and posting it properly (with a supporting bluelink per MOS:DABRL) at the Phoenix Academy disambiguation page. Which is progress, why should only U.S.-related "Phoenix" academies be listed, in this page which comes high in Google search display. --doncram 18:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Q: At Prospero (band), should Veela, singer for Prospero (band) who came from B.C. deserve the same redlink fixup treatment or should she just be delinked (judged not worthy of a Wikipedia article)?
I changed this to Bob Kerr (radio broadcaster) so it's no longer a dab, but it's now a redlink. Mr. Kerr might be deserving of an article. PKT(alk) 16:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it looks like he is. Especially when i find my way to Category:Classical music radio presenters and to AustralianBC's nav-list of red- and blue-linked presenters in template:ABC Classic FM. To finish on Bob Kerr, then the redlink needs to be added to the dab, with a supporting bluelink. And since describing his importance as being an alumni of his high school would be lame, i found my way to List of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation personalities and added him there, then could add his redlink to dab page properly. That is a fair amount of work to clear one dablink; it's better in this case IMHO but obviously harder than just delinking. Thanks PKT for considering it and making the redlink. The other two can be unlinked i suppose.
Aside: Expanding Template:CBC Radio to list presenters, copying ABC, would be good to do. That makes a worklist in effect, towards building coverage in this area. The "list of CBC personalities" is not friendly, and does not serve that kind of function. --doncram 00:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This list can take a little while to load, but it's much better for picking out issues to fix. Thanks! PKT(alk) 15:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bump. The tool/list is showing 249 links today, down from over 500 when the link was first posted. PKT(alk) 03:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The tool/list is not working for me right now, but I find just 77 dablinks to fix now, when I ran the catscan query (without autorun). It took 245 seconds to finish, after I hit "Do it". A few of them are:
Canadian Forestry Association 42911527 (Article) 938 20160213163317
Canadian National Road Race Championships 32234272 (Article) 10885 20160220153426
Canadian Party of Labour 1078657 (Article) 1834 20160223222707
Canadian Rangers 2858114 (Article) 18915 20160314233017
Caribou River (Thunder Bay District) 44691329 (Article) 3696 20160220153426
Carla Rice 40919626 (Article) 9426 20160220153426
Covenant Awards
Again, the query output gives clickable links to the articles, but doesn't run DabSolver (so cut & paste to DabSolver, is what I recall is how to proceed). --doncram 17:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Val-Jalbert
There's an editor (or group of editors) at Val-Jalbert that modifies one POV text (which I've improved slightly) to another POV text in which implications or outright claims are made that opponents of a project are drug users and vandals. Can some of you add it to your watchlist? Mindmatrix 14:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Aside: the section about the dam project needs some work and sourcing; I've done a little bit, but it's clearly insufficient. Anyone have familiarity with this project? Mindmatrix 14:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I read about it in the news, but I'll add some material and clean up the messy hydro dam section. When you have a problem like this one, please check with people over at fr:Discussion Projet:Québec. We usually do not follow closely what's going on over here, but some of us also contribute a bit on the English side. Bouchecl (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all. There's been an edit war at Canadian dollar, which spawned a discussion on the talk page. The two involved editors are currently blocked for a few days. Eyes and/or opinions welcome; I'll probably wade into it before the user blocks expire. Mindmatrix 16:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox for provinces and territories of Canada only lists the provincial/territorial flower, tree and bird. Most provinces/territories also have a provincial/territorial animal, mineral, and many have a provincial/territorial fish. Some provinces/territories also grass, soil, and fossil as their symbols. I think that if not all of the symbols, at least the animal, mineral, and fish should be added to the infobox.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Beejsterb (talk • contribs) 21:25, 22 January 2016
I'm not sure. I think that it would be better to remove all of them rather than making the infobox larger. The symbols could have a section in the body of the article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with CambridgeBayWeather on this. There shouldn't be more clutter in infoboxes; it makes more sense to me to list provincial/territorial symbols in a section of the respective articles. PKT(alk) 18:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree too. Good idea. Ground Zero | t 21:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Esoteric Technical Issue
Several articles about Canadian communities have a "Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "cp2011" defined multiple times with different content". Orillia is an example - the error shows up in the References section for footnote #1. I have been unable to fix these errors. In every case I have looked at, refname "cp2011" is defined in the infobox related to population, but it's not defined elsewhere. I think there's something in the Template:Canada census, which is used to show census highlights from 2011, 2006 and 2001, that is causing this error message, but I don't see anything in the template that defines the refname "cp2011".
Can an editor who understands template coding have a look into this? It will fix error messages on several (many?) pages related to Canadian communities. Thanks in advance! PKT(alk) 01:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I've noticed this error as well. It definitely relates somehow to the Canada census template, because that's where the competing reference tag is located if you try to solve the error by checking where the implicated footnotes are in an article — but I wasn't able to find that tag being defined anywhere in the template either. In reality, templates shouldn't be artificially transcluding references into their articles anyway — in a case like this, for example, the exact same reference is usually already in the article anyway, meaning that the transcluded reference causes this problem because we're using the same name in both places. But if we try to solve it by just renaming the tags in one place or the other to get them out of each other's way, then the article now features unnecessary duplication of the same reference as two different footnotes instead of one. So there's really just no way to make the template-transcluded reference useful without causing problems in the articles. Bearcat (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've found the problem, and it's actually even uglier than advertised: there's a second template, {{Canada census/reference}}, which is transcluded into {{Canada census}} to create the references that are then transcluded into the articles via the latter template. For the time being, I've changed the coding of that template so that it creates references named cp2year instead of cpyear, to get the transcluded references out of the way of the direct ones — however, changes to templates aren't instantaneously propagated through to all transclusions of that template, so it may take a few hours before the change actually pushes through to all of the affected articles. (I did null-edit one affected article just to check whether the change had worked or not, and it did — but I am not going to sit here for the next six hours nulling the entire list of articles just to force it through faster.) However, because that still leaves the issue of most articles now containing two different footnotes to the same page, we should still discuss totally dropping the transclusion of any references through the template. Bearcat (talk) 20:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Or the other alternative, if it's important that the information in the template be directly footnoted, would be to take the defining reference tag (the <ref name=cp2011>Complete URL of the census profile</ref> one) out of each article, so that the template itself defines the reference tag and each individual article only contains callback <ref name=cp2011/> tags to it. Bearcat (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Vita Tornado
The tornado happened on a Sunday afternoon as a baseball tournament was in progress. The funnel swept in from the states. It was June 19, 1955 & I was 10 years old. My parents owned the Old Bill's Inn Restaurant [Bill & Annie Shmigelsky]. Our restaurant was packed with people as many came in for shelter......some joked, some prayed & some cried as my oldest brother Bob & his teammates were stuffing pillows into broken windows. The north side of the tracks absorbed the most damage. The restaurant location was where todays Motor Inn is. The rest. was destroyed by fire a year later & my parents rebuilt and became The Shady Lawn Licensed Rest. & Motel [4 units]...After it was sold in 1968-9, it again was destroyed by fire. References on the tornado are in the Carillon News...Steinbach & also in the 1998 Shewchenko School Reflections [reunion] program with many pictures of the destruction. The school children we were extremely lucky it happened on a Sunday.
Thank you Martin Shmigelsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.66.168.245 (talk) 04:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that this page is not a venue for posting personal reflections or memoirs — it's a venue for discussion about Wikipedia content which requires the attention of one or more editors for some reason, not a forum to just post any random thing you want to talk about. Bearcat (talk) 22:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, he may have been looking for the requests page, and provided some information for an interested reader to find sources. I do agree that it could have been done with less anecdote, though. Mindmatrix 14:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cadillac Fairview malls
As many of you know, Cadillac Fairview has started branding its malls with a "CF" prefix (e.g. CF Chinook Centre, CF Eaton Centre, etc.). Accordingly, for the past few months some of the mall articles have been moving back and forth between the traditional mall names and the new CF + mall name monickers. Rather than having a series of individual battles, with possibly inconsistent results, I thought it might make sense to have a central discussion to try and find some comprehensive consensus. My gut reaction is that the new CF names have not yet been shown to meet the WP:COMMONNAME test, and I noticed this morning that newspapers in Toronto (I checked the Globe and the Star) are mostly not using the CF names (although someone should do a more thorough media review).
If this discussion has already occurred, my apologies. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I did a search for Eaton Centre as an example and other than press releases or other non-independent sources, all other sources don't include CF. The CF shouldn't be included right now. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Did a similar look yesterday, before requesting move reverts. The user in question (@Echaryk: works in marketing for CF (simple Google search tells you this), and there are almost no reliable sources that put CF in front of the names.
Also, in general Wikipedia doesn't use sponsorship names (for example the many sponsored sports stadia that don't use their official/sponsored name). Joseph2302 (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody except CF appears to use the addition of their corporate identity. Recent advertising materials for high profile tenants don't (see recent Nordstrom announcements), nor do any of the websites for existing tenants that I have found. In addition, even CF's own website refers to the centres without the 'CF' in the majority of prose on many pages. Considering that the centres already have established public identities, unless CF is undertaking a gradual complete rebranding of all of them to simply 'CF Centre' or similar, I can't see how this clumsy agglutination will ever really catch on and we shouldn't be in the position of leading that process. Pyrope 19:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
On a side note, regarding North American sports venues: since the media typically uses the sponsored name, usually the corresponding Wikipedia article will be renamed when the venue is renamed. However it's unclear at this point if the subtle rebranding of the malls will result in a change in common usage. isaacl (talk) 23:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Compare the former CN & CP railway hotels now in the Fairmont chain, all having been officially so branded for at least a decade: I just had a quick look at a handful of our articles, and none of those are under titles beginning with “(The) Fairmont”.—Odysseus1479 00:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fairmont Royal York does, although in that case this is to disambiguate the Toronto establishment from other 'Royal York' hotels. However, in the majority of cases you are absolutely right. Pyrope 02:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Other than noting the 'CF' in the article, I see no reason to change from the common names. If there is a new mall to be built with a new name, I could understand that possibly. But right now, I don't see the company being able to get the 'CF' into common usage. I believe it is more for industry insiders, and the retail and construction industry media. E.g. urbantoronto.ca. Alaney2k (talk) 04:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Yes I do work for Cadillac Fairview and I am simply just trying to update the content in the Wikipedia pages to ensure they are accurate. The mall properties were rebranded recently with "CF" at the end of 2015. This is not a sponsorship, rather it's the new legal name of the buildings. Signage in the buildings have been updated to reflect this change as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Echaryk (talk • contribs)
@Echaryk: We don't go by legal name in Wikipedia. As previously mentioned, 'CF' can be noted in the article, but the malls are commonly referred to by the public without your corporate suffix. I doubt if you do that internally either. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Echaryk, I think you should review our guideline at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before making any further edits to CF-related articles. Second, we believe our articles are accurate when they reflect the English-language naming that is generally used in the world (see WP:COMMONNAME), which does not necessarily correspond to official names or corporate branding (although the latter can be mentioned in the body of an article, as Secondarywaltz notes above). Thus, we have articles, for example, on Bob Rae, Rhode Island and Quebec City, not Robert Keith Rae, State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, or Ville de Québec. If the general public and media start to routinely refer to these malls as "CF Eaton Centre", "CF Sherway Gardens", etc. then we would, of course, reconsider the titles of these articles.Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Echaryk, what you're being told in this discussion is correct — the title of a page is dictated by the thing's WP:COMMONNAME, not its "official" one. So the "CF" addition can be noted in the body of the article, but it's not appropriate to move the page to a new title until somebody can demonstrate that the new name has actually superseded the old one in common usage. Bearcat (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks everyone for your comments. Many of the higher profile articles had already been moved back to the original titles some time ago, so I cleaned up whatever was left. Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
On March 13, Echaryk changed the articles again, despite being told not to. I have reverted them. freshacconci talk to me 14:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Taking a few of your reverts at random, the changes made seem fairly innocuous and minor: [1], [2], [3]. This edit has a more subjective element, regarding what stores should be considered anchor tenants, but I don't feel the edit is promotional, which your warning on the user's talk page is about. Perhaps the editor can be given appropriate guidance regarding the best approach to make minor article updates? I know the usual advice is "use the talk page", but for low-profile pages there may be a lengthy delay before someone decides to take any action. Perhaps for trivial changes such as updating a web site link, minor factual updates, or insubstantial copy edits, something more streamlined could be suggested? (A paid-contributor disclosure still hasn't been given in the prescribed manner, which remains an issue.) isaacl (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Canadian royal succession
We need input at Monarchy of Canada, as to how to present the Canadian royal succession. GoodDay (talk) 20:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I've been working a bit on this article, trying to fix it up (and hopefully get rid of the pesky template at the top). I've done a bit and it's looking a bit better to me, but I wouldn't mind having some other eyes go over it and see if there are any glaring issues - especially with referencing. Thanks! Ajraddatz (Talk) 06:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone know which are the most reliable definitions for defining the regions of Canada? It would be good to decide on which ones to use that closely reflects the climate since I may be planning to write a Wikipedia article on the Climate of Canada in a similar structure to Climate of India and Climate of Argentina (the latter that I have successfully expanded from start class to GA) in which the climate of different regions are described in these articles. Thanks. Ssbbplayer (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
New article on Special Olympics pioneer Frank Hayden
I have just started an article on Special Olympics pioneer Frank Hayden. I would welcome any help in improving the article, in particular from editors familiar with biography articles. --papageno (talk) 18:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've been cleaning up this article a bit, but it's still a mess. Apart from the poor writing and promotional tone, it appears that this is mostly original research. The city refers to the area as "Markham Centre", to which I've linked in the article. Many edits to this article are by editors who have edited nothing but this article (eg: 99.247.70.112, Packers35, Bungalow8). To me, this appears to be a marketing term by Remington Group (the developers of the project); the website about the location is operated by Remington. Other online mentions (such as at Urban Toronto) are clearly promotional fluff pieces. My inclination is to move this to "Markham Center", or merge it to Unionville, Ontario, Markham, Ontario and/or other articles, but I thought I'd solicit some ideas first. So...ideas? Mindmatrix 03:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely support a move to "Markham Centre", as the City of Markham calls the area. I also think that an article should exist for the area, given that there are articles for all sorts of areas/neighbourhoods of Markham. PKT(alk) 23:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Map
I've put together this useful map, detailing provincial WikiProject activity levels. MB298 (talk) 22:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What criteria was used to determine a WP active v. semi-active? Also, I recommend that the map have a legend within it. Hwy43 (talk) 03:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Still think our talk from years ago should be implemented....that is redirect the tlak pages here...we come here anyways. -- Moxy (talk) 03:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's horrible and imperialistic. the WP:QWNB already replaced the WPP Talk Page. And the region/city project talk pages deal with local matters that a national project wouldn't deal with unless there were no local projects. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 03:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We usually follow the format Example Street (city), (and not Example Street, City), correct? Was just discussing a similar topic with Hong Kong related streets, and looked into Category:Roads in Toronto, and found it not entirely consistent. --kelapstick(bainuu) 05:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't seen a policy, or anything consistent. I believe parentheses is the best way to disambiguate. 117Avenue (talk) 00:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kelapstick: Coincidentally, see the latest thread at WT:CRWP and follow the link to the March 2012 version of the WikiProject page for naming conventions in Canada. Therein may lie an answer for you. It was just noticed as missing and a new home will be found for it tonight. Hwy43 (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Does WP:CANST have anything? CRWP is for highways, but CANST is for streets -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't aware of WP:CANST. Appears inactive since late 2011. Also nothing there regarding the above. I've since ploughed through all the sub-cats at Category:Streets in Canada by city. With the exception of in Edmonton, the dominant format appears to be parentheses, but it is not an overwhelming majority. IIRC, the MOS or something similar states default format for geographic-related disambiguation is to use parentheses except for communities, which uses the comma convention. WP:CANSTYLE#Geography speaks to natural geographic features, but not constructed ones such as streets, buildings, etc. I agree with 117Avenue that parentheses would be the best way to disambiguate streets. Hwy43 (talk) 07:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CANST has never been active. I don't know why it was created, why it couldn't be handled by CANROADS. 117Avenue (talk) 01:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IIRC, CRWP and other roads projects refused jurisdiction for streets. Asking about tagging for the various HWY/RD projects to street articles gets rejections. But circumstances may have changed since the time the various STREETS projects were formed. (such as WP:CANST and WP:USST )
Personally, I think a single wikiproject to cover tracks/trails/roads/highways/streets makes more sense. Perhaps we should ask CRWP and CANST to merge together.
I have reluctantly nominated this article for deletion after finding no quality references in doing a google books search and google search. However, if the claims in the article are accurate he certainly would be considered a notable Canadian. Perhaps there are members of this project who have access to sources offline which may rescue this article. Best.4meter4 (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I commented on the AFD. I can't find anything offline through database searches myself, though by no means does that mean that there isn't anything. Ajraddatz (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Alexander Street Press (ASP) is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online: Premium collection" includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (like 60 minutes) and newsreels, music and theatre, speeches and lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. This collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, engineering, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. For more topics see their website.
There are up to 30 one-year ASP accounts available to experienced Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 21:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
anyone want to cleanup the worlds largest infobox--Moxy (talk) 17:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Haha... I'm not even sure where to start. Maybe removing the image montage at the top, and moving it somewhere else in the article? This might be worth discussing on the article's talk page, in case the people who added all the stuff in the first place have thoughts on it. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've taken a pass at it, more work welcome. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, HMCS Quebec has been proposed to be merged into HMS Uganda, see the discussion at Talk:HMS Uganda (66) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]