Pseudomonadota: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
consistent citation formatting; combined repeated citations
added missing data to cites
Line 33: Line 33:


== Classification ==
== Classification ==
American microbiologist [[Carl Woese]] established this grouping in 1987, calling it informally the "purple bacteria and their relatives".<ref name="woese87">{{cite journal | vauthors = Woese CR | title = Bacterial evolution | journal = Microbiological Reviews | volume = 51 | issue = 2 | pages = 221–271 | date = June 1987 | pmid = 2439888 | pmc = 373105 | doi = 10.1128/MMBR.51.2.221-271.1987 }}</ref> The group was later formally named the 'Proteobacteria' after the Greek god Proteus, who was known to assume many forms.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Moon CD, Young W, Maclean PH, Cookson AL, Bermingham EN | title = Metagenomic insights into the roles of Proteobacteria in the gastrointestinal microbiomes of healthy dogs and cats | journal = MicrobiologyOpen | volume = 7 | issue = 5 | pages = e00677 | date = October 2018 | pmid = 29911322 | pmc = 6182564 | doi = 10.1002/mbo3.677 }}</ref> In 2021 the [[International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes]] designated the synonym Pseudomonadota, and renamed many other prokaryotic phyla as well.<ref name="Phynally" /> This renaming of several [[prokaryote]] phyla in 2021, including Pseudomonadota, remains controversial among microbiologists, many of whom continue to use the earlier name Proteobacteria, of long standing in the literature.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/newly-renamed-prokaryote-phyla-cause-uproar-69578 | title=Newly Renamed Prokaryote Phyla Cause Uproar }}</ref> The phylum Pseudomonadota encompasses classes ''Acidithiobacilia, Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Hydrogenophilia'', and ''Zetaproteobacteria.''<ref name = "Kersters_2006" /> The phylum includes a wide variety of [[pathogen]]ic genera, such as ''[[Escherichia]]'', ''[[Salmonella]]'', ''[[Vibrio]]'', ''[[Yersinia]]'', ''[[Legionella]]'', and many others.<ref name="Slonczewski">Slonczewski JL, Foster JW, Foster E. Microbiology: An Evolving Science 5th Ed. WW Norton & Company; 2020.</ref> Others are free-living (non-[[Parasitism|parasitic]]) and include many of the [[bacteria]]
American microbiologist [[Carl Woese]] established this grouping in 1987, calling it informally the "purple bacteria and their relatives".<ref name="woese87">{{cite journal | vauthors = Woese CR | title = Bacterial evolution | journal = Microbiological Reviews | volume = 51 | issue = 2 | pages = 221–271 | date = June 1987 | pmid = 2439888 | pmc = 373105 | doi = 10.1128/MMBR.51.2.221-271.1987 }}</ref> The group was later formally named the 'Proteobacteria' after the Greek god Proteus, who was known to assume many forms.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Moon CD, Young W, Maclean PH, Cookson AL, Bermingham EN | title = Metagenomic insights into the roles of Proteobacteria in the gastrointestinal microbiomes of healthy dogs and cats | journal = MicrobiologyOpen | volume = 7 | issue = 5 | pages = e00677 | date = October 2018 | pmid = 29911322 | pmc = 6182564 | doi = 10.1002/mbo3.677 }}</ref> In 2021 the [[International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes]] designated the synonym Pseudomonadota, and renamed many other prokaryotic phyla as well.<ref name="Phynally" /> This renaming of several [[prokaryote]] phyla in 2021, including Pseudomonadota, remains controversial among microbiologists, many of whom continue to use the earlier name Proteobacteria, of long standing in the literature.<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Robitzski D | date = 4 January 2022 | work = The Scientist | url=https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/newly-renamed-prokaryote-phyla-cause-uproar-69578 | title=Newly Renamed Prokaryote Phyla Cause Uproar }}</ref> The phylum Pseudomonadota encompasses classes ''Acidithiobacilia, Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Hydrogenophilia'', and ''Zetaproteobacteria.''<ref name = "Kersters_2006" /> The phylum includes a wide variety of [[pathogen]]ic genera, such as ''[[Escherichia]]'', ''[[Salmonella]]'', ''[[Vibrio]]'', ''[[Yersinia]]'', ''[[Legionella]]'', and many others.<ref name="Slonczewski">{{cite book | vauthors = Slonczewski JL, Foster JW, Foster E | title = Microbiology: An Evolving Science | edition = 5th | publisher = WW Norton & Company | date = 2020 }}</ref> Others are free-living (non-[[Parasitism|parasitic]]) and include many of the [[bacteria]]


Previously, the Pseudomonadota phylum included two additional classes, namely ''Deltaproteobacteria'' and ''Oligoflexia''. However, further investigation into the phylogeny of these taxa through genomic marker analysis demonstrated their separation from the Pseudomonadota phylum.<ref name="Waite_2020">{{cite journal | vauthors = Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, Loy A, Naganuma T, Nakai R, Whitman WB, Hahn MW, Kuever J, Hugenholtz P | title = Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes <i>Deltaproteobacteria</i> and <i>Oligoflexia</i>, and the phylum <i>Thermodesulfobacteria</i> into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities | journal = International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology | volume = 70 | issue = 11 | pages = 5972–6016 | date = November 2020 | pmid = 33151140 | doi = 10.1099/ijsem.0.004213 | doi-access = free }}</ref> ''Deltaproteobacteria'' has been identified as a diverse taxonomic unit, leading to a proposal for its reclassification into distinct phyla: ''Desulfobacterota'' (encompassing ''Thermodesulfobacteria''), ''Myxococcota'', and ''Bdellovibrionota'' (comprising ''Oligoflexia'').<ref name="Waite_2020" />
Previously, the Pseudomonadota phylum included two additional classes, namely ''Deltaproteobacteria'' and ''Oligoflexia''. However, further investigation into the phylogeny of these taxa through genomic marker analysis demonstrated their separation from the Pseudomonadota phylum.<ref name="Waite_2020">{{cite journal | vauthors = Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, Loy A, Naganuma T, Nakai R, Whitman WB, Hahn MW, Kuever J, Hugenholtz P | title = Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes <i>Deltaproteobacteria</i> and <i>Oligoflexia</i>, and the phylum <i>Thermodesulfobacteria</i> into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities | journal = International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology | volume = 70 | issue = 11 | pages = 5972–6016 | date = November 2020 | pmid = 33151140 | doi = 10.1099/ijsem.0.004213 | doi-access = free }}</ref> ''Deltaproteobacteria'' has been identified as a diverse taxonomic unit, leading to a proposal for its reclassification into distinct phyla: ''Desulfobacterota'' (encompassing ''Thermodesulfobacteria''), ''Myxococcota'', and ''Bdellovibrionota'' (comprising ''Oligoflexia'').<ref name="Waite_2020" />
Line 55: Line 55:
|-
|-
! colspan="1" | according to ARB living tree, iTOL, Bergey's and others.
! colspan="1" | according to ARB living tree, iTOL, Bergey's and others.
! colspan="1" | 16S rRNA based [[The All-Species Living Tree Project|LTP]]_12_2021<ref>{{cite web |title=The LTP |url=https://imedea.uib-csic.es/mmg/ltp/#LTP |access-date=23 February 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=LTP_all tree in newick format |url=https://imedea.uib-csic.es/mmg/ltp/wp-content/uploads/ltp/Tree_LTP_all_12_2021.ntree |access-date=23 February 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=LTP_12_2021 Release Notes |url=https://imedea.uib-csic.es/mmg/ltp/wp-content/uploads/ltp/LTP_12_2021_release_notes.pdf |access-date=23 February 2021}}</ref>
! colspan="1" | 16S rRNA based [[The All-Species Living Tree Project|LTP]]_12_2021<ref>{{cite web |title= The All-Species Living Tree (LTP) Project |url=https://imedea.uib-csic.es/mmg/ltp/#LTP |access-date=23 February 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=LTP_all tree in newick format |url=https://imedea.uib-csic.es/mmg/ltp/wp-content/uploads/ltp/Tree_LTP_all_12_2021.ntree |access-date=23 February 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=LTP_12_2021 Release Notes |url=https://imedea.uib-csic.es/mmg/ltp/wp-content/uploads/ltp/LTP_12_2021_release_notes.pdf |access-date=23 February 2021}}</ref>
! colspan="1" | 120 single copy marker proteins based [[Genome Taxonomy Database|GTDB]] 08-RS214<ref name="about">{{cite web |title=GTDB release 08-RS214 |url=https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/about#4%7C |access-date=10 May 2023 |website=[[Genome Taxonomy Database]]}}</ref><ref name="tree">{{cite web |title=bac120_r214.sp_label |url=https://data.gtdb.ecogenomic.org/releases/release214/214.0/auxillary_files/bac120_r214.sp_labels.tree |access-date=10 May 2023 |website=[[Genome Taxonomy Database]]}}</ref><ref name="taxon_history">{{cite web |title=Taxon History |url=https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/taxon_history/ |access-date=10 May 2023 |website=[[Genome Taxonomy Database]]}}</ref>
! colspan="1" | 120 single copy marker proteins based [[Genome Taxonomy Database|GTDB]] 08-RS214<ref name="about">{{cite web |title=GTDB release 08-RS214 |url=https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/about#4%7C |access-date=10 May 2023 |website=[[Genome Taxonomy Database]]}}</ref><ref name="tree">{{cite web |title=bac120_r214.sp_label |url=https://data.gtdb.ecogenomic.org/releases/release214/214.0/auxillary_files/bac120_r214.sp_labels.tree |access-date=10 May 2023 |website=[[Genome Taxonomy Database]]}}</ref><ref name="taxon_history">{{cite web |title=Taxon History |url=https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/taxon_history/ |access-date=10 May 2023 |website=[[Genome Taxonomy Database]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
Line 139: Line 139:
==Characteristics==
==Characteristics==
{{refimprove section|date=December 2023}}
{{refimprove section|date=December 2023}}
Pseudomonadota are a diverse group. Though some species may stain Gram-positive or Gram-variable in the laboratory, they are nominally [[Gram-negative]]. Their unique [[Bacterial outer membrane|outer membrane]] is mainly composed of [[Lipopolysaccharide|lipopolysaccharides]], which helps differentiate them from the Gram-positive species<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S | title = The bacterial cell envelope | journal = Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology | volume = 2 | issue = 5 | pages = a000414 | date = May 2010 | pmid = 20452953 | pmc = 2857177 | doi = 10.1101/cshperspect.a000414 }}</ref>. Most Pseudomonadota are motile and move using flagella. Many move about using [[Flagellum|flagella]], but some are nonmotile, or rely on [[bacterial gliding]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pseudomonadota Garrity et al., 2021 |url=https://www.gbif.org/species/113662549 |access-date=2024-04-11 |website=www.gbif.org |language=en}}</ref>
Pseudomonadota are a diverse group. Though some species may stain Gram-positive or Gram-variable in the laboratory, they are nominally [[Gram-negative]]. Their unique [[Bacterial outer membrane|outer membrane]] is mainly composed of [[Lipopolysaccharide|lipopolysaccharides]], which helps differentiate them from the Gram-positive species<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S | title = The bacterial cell envelope | journal = Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology | volume = 2 | issue = 5 | pages = a000414 | date = May 2010 | pmid = 20452953 | pmc = 2857177 | doi = 10.1101/cshperspect.a000414 }}</ref>. Most Pseudomonadota are motile and move using flagella. Many move about using [[Flagellum|flagella]], but some are nonmotile, or rely on [[bacterial gliding]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pseudomonadota Garrity et al., 2021 |url=https://www.gbif.org/species/113662549 |access-date=2024-04-11 | work = Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) |language=en}}</ref>


Pseudomonadota have a wide variety of [[metabolism]] types. Most are facultatively or obligately [[anaerobic organism|anaerobic]], [[chemolithoautotrophic]], and [[heterotrophic]], but numerous exceptions occur. A variety of genera, which are not closely related to each other, convert energy from light through conventional [[photosynthesis]] or [[anoxygenic photosynthesis]].{{cn|date=November 2023}}
Pseudomonadota have a wide variety of [[metabolism]] types. Most are facultatively or obligately [[anaerobic organism|anaerobic]], [[chemolithoautotrophic]], and [[heterotrophic]], but numerous exceptions occur. A variety of genera, which are not closely related to each other, convert energy from light through conventional [[photosynthesis]] or [[anoxygenic photosynthesis]].{{cn|date=November 2023}}

Revision as of 06:23, 17 April 2024

Pseudomonadota
Escherichia coli
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Pseudomonadota
Garrity et al. 2021[1]
Classes
Synonyms
  • "Proteobacteria" Stackebrandt et al. 1988[6]
  • "Proteobacteria" Gray and Herwig 1996[7]
  • "Proteobacteria" Garrity et al. 2005[8]
  • "Proteobacteria" Cavalier-Smith 2002[9]
  • Alphaproteobacteraeota Oren et al. 2015
  • "Alphaproteobacteriota" Whitman et al. 2018
  • "Caulobacterota" corrig. Garrity et al. 2021
  • "Neoprotei" Pelletier 2012
  • Rhodobacteria Cavalier-Smith 2002

Pseudomonadota (synonym Proteobacteria) is a major phylum of Gram-negative bacteria.[10] Currently, they are considered the predominant phylum within the realm of bacteria.[11] They are naturally found as pathogenic and free-living (non-parasitic) genera.[11] The phylum comprises six classes Acidithiobacilia, Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Hydrogenophilia, and Zetaproteobacteria.[12] The Pseudomonadota are widely diverse, with differences in morphology, metabolic processes, relevance to humans, and ecological influence.[11]

Classification

American microbiologist Carl Woese established this grouping in 1987, calling it informally the "purple bacteria and their relatives".[13] The group was later formally named the 'Proteobacteria' after the Greek god Proteus, who was known to assume many forms.[14] In 2021 the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes designated the synonym Pseudomonadota, and renamed many other prokaryotic phyla as well.[1] This renaming of several prokaryote phyla in 2021, including Pseudomonadota, remains controversial among microbiologists, many of whom continue to use the earlier name Proteobacteria, of long standing in the literature.[15] The phylum Pseudomonadota encompasses classes Acidithiobacilia, Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Hydrogenophilia, and Zetaproteobacteria.[12] The phylum includes a wide variety of pathogenic genera, such as Escherichia, Salmonella, Vibrio, Yersinia, Legionella, and many others.[16] Others are free-living (non-parasitic) and include many of the bacteria

Previously, the Pseudomonadota phylum included two additional classes, namely Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia. However, further investigation into the phylogeny of these taxa through genomic marker analysis demonstrated their separation from the Pseudomonadota phylum.[17] Deltaproteobacteria has been identified as a diverse taxonomic unit, leading to a proposal for its reclassification into distinct phyla: Desulfobacterota (encompassing Thermodesulfobacteria), Myxococcota, and Bdellovibrionota (comprising Oligoflexia).[17]

The class Epsilonprotobacteria was additionally identified within the Pseudomonadota phylum. This class is characterized by its significance as chemolithotrophic primary producers and its metabolic prowess in deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems.[18] Noteworthy pathogenic genera within this class include Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Arcobacter. Analysis of phylogenetic tree topology and genetic markers revealed the direct divergence of Epsilonprotobacteria from the Pseudomonadota phylum.[18] Limited outgroup data and low bootstrap values support these discoveries. Despite further investigations, consensus has not been reached regarding the monophyletic nature of Epsilonproteobacteria within Proteobacteria, prompting researchers to propose its taxonomic separation from the phylum. The proposed reclassification of the name Epsilonprotobacteria is Campylobacterota.[18]

Taxonomy

The currently accepted taxonomy is based on the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LSPN)[19] and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).[20]

The group is defined primarily in terms of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences. The Pseudomonadota are divided into several classes. These were previously regarded as subclasses of the phylum, but they are now treated as classes. These classes are monophyletic.[21][22][23] The genus Acidithiobacillus, part of the Gammaproteobacteria until it was transferred to class Acidithiobacillia in 2013,[2] was previously regarded as paraphyletic to the Betaproteobacteria according to multigenome alignment studies.[24] In 2017, the Betaproteobacteria was subject to major revisions and the class Hydrogenophilalia was created to contain the order Hydrogenophilales[4]

Pseudomonadota classes with validly published names include some prominent genera:[25] e.g.:

according to ARB living tree, iTOL, Bergey's and others. 16S rRNA based LTP_12_2021[26][27][28] 120 single copy marker proteins based GTDB 08-RS214[29][30][31]

"Caulobacteria" (Alphaproteobacteria)

"Mariprofundia" (Zetaproteobacteria)

"Magnetococcia"

"Pseudomonadia"

clade 1

"Foliamicales"

clade 3

Immundisolibacterales

clade 5

"Acidithiobacillidae" (Acidithiobacillia)

"Neisseriidae" (Betaproteobacteria & nested Hydrogenophilalia)

"Pseudomonadidae" (Gammaproteobacteria)

Characteristics

Pseudomonadota are a diverse group. Though some species may stain Gram-positive or Gram-variable in the laboratory, they are nominally Gram-negative. Their unique outer membrane is mainly composed of lipopolysaccharides, which helps differentiate them from the Gram-positive species[32]. Most Pseudomonadota are motile and move using flagella. Many move about using flagella, but some are nonmotile, or rely on bacterial gliding.[33]

Pseudomonadota have a wide variety of metabolism types. Most are facultatively or obligately anaerobic, chemolithoautotrophic, and heterotrophic, but numerous exceptions occur. A variety of genera, which are not closely related to each other, convert energy from light through conventional photosynthesis or anoxygenic photosynthesis.[citation needed]

The Acidithiobacillia contain only sulfur, iron, and uranium-oxidising autotrophs. The type order is the Acidithiobacillales, which includes economically important organisms used in the mining industry such as Acidithiobacillus spp.[citation needed]

Some Alphaproteobacteria can grow at very low levels of nutrients and have unusual morphology such as stalks and buds. Others include agriculturally important bacteria capable of inducing nitrogen fixation in symbiosis with plants. The type order is the Caulobacterales, comprising stalk-forming bacteria such as Caulobacter. The mitochondria of eukaryotes are thought to be descendants of an alphaproteobacterium.

The Betaproteobacteria are highly metabolically diverse and contain chemolithoautotrophs, photoautotrophs, and generalist heterotrophs. The type order is the Burkholderiales, comprising an enormous range of metabolic diversity, including opportunistic pathogens.[citation needed]

The Gammaproteobacteria are one of the largest classes in terms of genera, containing approximately 250 validly published names. The type order is the Pseudomonadales, which include the genera Pseudomonas and the nitrogen-fixing Azotobacter.[citation needed]

The Hydrogenophilalia are thermophilic chemoheterotrophs and autotrophs. The bacteria typically use hydrogen gas as an electron donor. The type order is the Hydrogenophilales which contains two genera, Hydrogenophilus and Tepidiphilus.

The Zetaproteobacteria are best known for being iron-oxidizing neutrophilic chemolithoautotrophs, distributed worldwide in estuaries and marine habitats. This group is so successful in its environment due to to their microaerophilic nature. Because they require less oxygen than what is present in the atmosphere, they are able to compete with abiotic iron(II) oxidation. The type order is the Mariprofundales.[citation needed]

Transformation

Transformation, a process in which genetic material passes from one bacterium to another,[34] has been reported in at least 30 species of Pseudomonadota distributed in the classes alpha, beta, and gamma.[35] The best-studied Pseudomonadota with respect to natural genetic transformation are the medically important human pathogens Neisseria gonorrhoeae (class beta), and Haemophilus influenzae (class gamma).[36] Natural genetic transformation is a sexual process involving DNA transfer from one bacterial cell to another through the intervening medium and the integration of the donor sequence into the recipient genome. In pathogenic Pseudomonadota, transformation appears to serve as a DNA repair process that protects the pathogen's DNA from attack by their host's phagocytic defenses that employ oxidative free radicals.[36]

Habitat

Due to the distinctive nature of each of the six classes of Pseudomonadota, this phylum occupies a multitude of habitats. These include:

  • Human oral cavity[37]
  • Microbial mats in the deep sea[38]
  • Marine sediments[7]
  • Thermal sulfur springs[39]
  • Agricultural soil[39]
  • Hydrothermal vents[40]
  • Stem nodules of legumes[12][12]
  • Within aphids as endosymbionts[12]
  • Gastrointestinal tract of warm-blooded species[12]
  • Brackish, estuary waters[12]
  • Microbiomes of shrimp and mollusks[12]
  • Human vaginal tract[10]

Significance

Human Health

Studies have suggested Pseudomonadota as a relevant signature of disease in the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract, by operating as a marker for microbiota instability.[10] The human gut microbiome consists mainly of four phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Pseudomonadota.[10] Microorganism gut colonization is dynamic from birth to death, with stabilization at the first few years of life, to higher diversity in adults, to reduced diversity in the elderly.[10] The gut microbiome conducts processes like nutrient synthesis, chemical metabolism, and the formation of the gut barrier.[10] Additionally, the gut microbiome facilitates host interactions with its surrounding environment through regulation of nutrient absorption and bacterial intake. In 16s rRNA and metagenome sequencing studies, Proteobacteria have been identified as bacteria that prompts endotoxemia (an inflammatory gut response) and metabolic disorders in human GI tracts.[10] An example in Lambeth et al. found increased bacterial count in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in comparison to patients with pre-diabetes or other control groups.[41] Another study by Michail et al. showed a correlation of microbial composition in children with and without nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), wherein patients with NAFLD having a higher abundance of Gammproteobacteria than patients without the disease.[42]

Classes Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria are prevalent within the human oral cavity, and are markers for good oral health.[37] The oral microbiome consists of 11 habitats, including the tongue dorsum, hard palate, tonsils, throat, saliva, and more.[43] Changes in the oral microbiome are due to endogenous and exogenous factors like host lifestyle, genotype, environment, immune system, and socioeconomic status.[43] Considering diet as a factor, high saturated fatty acid (SAF) content, achieved through poor diet, has been correlated to increased abundance of Betaproteobacteria in the oral cavity.[43]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Oren A, Garrity GM (October 2021). "Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 71 (10): 5056. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.005056. PMID 34694987. S2CID 239887308.
  2. ^ a b c Williams KP, Kelly DP (August 2013). "Proposal for a new class within the phylum Proteobacteria, Acidithiobacillia classis nov., with the type order Acidithiobacillales, and emended description of the class Gammaproteobacteria". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 63 (Pt 8): 2901–2906. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.049270-0. PMID 23334881. S2CID 39777860.
  3. ^ Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T (2005). "Class I. Alphaproteobacteria class. nov.". In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds.). Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 2 (Proteobacteria), Part C (The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta- and Epsilonproteobacteria) (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 1. doi:10.1002/9781118960608.cbm00041. ISBN 978-1-118-96060-8.
  4. ^ a b c Boden R, Hutt LP, Rae AW (May 2017). "Reclassification of Thiobacillus aquaesulis (Wood & Kelly, 1995) as Annwoodia aquaesulis gen. nov., comb. nov., transfer of Thiobacillus (Beijerinck, 1904) from the Hydrogenophilales to the Nitrosomonadales, proposal of Hydrogenophilalia class. nov. within the 'Proteobacteria', and four new families within the orders Nitrosomonadales and Rhodocyclales". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 67 (5): 1191–1205. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.001927. hdl:10026.1/8740. PMID 28581923.
  5. ^ Emerson D, Rentz JA, Lilburn TG, Davis RE, Aldrich H, Chan C, et al. (August 2007). "A novel lineage of proteobacteria involved in formation of marine Fe-oxidizing microbial mat communities". PloS One. 2 (7): e667. Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..667E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000667. PMC 1930151. PMID 17668050.
  6. ^ Stackebrandt E, Murray RG, Trüper HG (1988). "Proteobacteria classis nov., a name for the phylogenetic taxon that includes the "purple bacteria and their relatives"". International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 38 (3): 321–325. doi:10.1099/00207713-38-3-321.
  7. ^ a b Gray JP, Herwig RP (November 1996). "Phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial communities in marine sediments". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 62 (11): 4049–4059. Bibcode:1996ApEnM..62.4049G. doi:10.1128/aem.62.11.4049-4059.1996. PMC 168226. PMID 8899989.
  8. ^ Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T (2005). "Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov.". In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds.). Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 2 (Proteobacteria), Part B (Gammaproteobacteria) (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. p. 1.
  9. ^ Cavalier-Smith T (January 2002). "The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 52 (Pt 1): 7–76. doi:10.1099/00207713-52-1-7. PMID 11837318.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Rizzatti G, Lopetuso LR, Gibiino G, Binda C, Gasbarrini A (2017). "Proteobacteria: A Common Factor in Human Diseases". BioMed Research International. 2017: 9351507. doi:10.1155/2017/9351507. PMC 5688358. PMID 29230419.
  11. ^ a b c Parker CT, Garrity GM (1 January 2003). "Nomenclature Abstract for Pseudomonadota corrig. Garrity et al. 2021". The NamesforLife Abstracts. doi:10.1601/nm.40185 (inactive 16 April 2024). Retrieved 2024-04-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of April 2024 (link)
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h Kersters K, De Vos P, Gillis M, Swings J, Vandamme P, Stackebrandt E (2006). "Introduction to the Proteobacteria". In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH (eds.). The Prokaryotes. Vol. 5: Proteobacteria: Alpha and Beta Subclasses. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 3–37. doi:10.1007/0-387-30745-1_1. ISBN 978-0-387-30745-9. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
  13. ^ Woese CR (June 1987). "Bacterial evolution". Microbiological Reviews. 51 (2): 221–271. doi:10.1128/MMBR.51.2.221-271.1987. PMC 373105. PMID 2439888.
  14. ^ Moon CD, Young W, Maclean PH, Cookson AL, Bermingham EN (October 2018). "Metagenomic insights into the roles of Proteobacteria in the gastrointestinal microbiomes of healthy dogs and cats". MicrobiologyOpen. 7 (5): e00677. doi:10.1002/mbo3.677. PMC 6182564. PMID 29911322.
  15. ^ Robitzski D (4 January 2022). "Newly Renamed Prokaryote Phyla Cause Uproar". The Scientist.
  16. ^ Slonczewski JL, Foster JW, Foster E (2020). Microbiology: An Evolving Science (5th ed.). WW Norton & Company.
  17. ^ a b Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, et al. (November 2020). "Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 70 (11): 5972–6016. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004213. PMID 33151140.
  18. ^ a b c Waite DW, Vanwonterghem I, Rinke C, Parks DH, Zhang Y, Takai K, et al. (2017). "Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Class Epsilonproteobacteria and Proposed Reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.)". Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 682. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00682. PMC 5401914. PMID 28484436.
  19. ^ Euzéby JP. "Pseudomonadota". List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN). Retrieved 2016-03-20.
  20. ^ Sayers. "Proteobacteria". National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) taxonomy database. Retrieved 2016-03-20.
  21. ^ Krieg NR, Brenner DJ, Staley JT (2005). Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 2: The Proteobacteria. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-95040-2.
  22. ^ Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, von Mering C, Creevey CJ, Snel B, Bork P (March 2006). "Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life". Science. 311 (5765): 1283–1287. Bibcode:2006Sci...311.1283C. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.381.9514. doi:10.1126/science.1123061. PMID 16513982. S2CID 1615592.
  23. ^ Yarza P, Ludwig W, Euzéby J, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Glöckner FO, et al. (October 2010). "Update of the All-Species Living Tree Project based on 16S and 23S rRNA sequence analyses". Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 33 (6): 291–299. doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2010.08.001. PMID 20817437.
  24. ^ Williams KP, Gillespie JJ, Sobral BW, Nordberg EK, Snyder EE, Shallom JM, et al. (May 2010). "Phylogeny of gammaproteobacteria". Journal of Bacteriology. 192 (9): 2305–2314. doi:10.1128/JB.01480-09. PMC 2863478. PMID 20207755.
  25. ^ "Interactive Tree of Life". Heidelberg, DE: European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2022-02-23. Retrieved 2022-02-23.
  26. ^ "The All-Species Living Tree (LTP) Project". Retrieved 2021-02-23.
  27. ^ "LTP_all tree in newick format". Retrieved 2021-02-23.
  28. ^ "LTP_12_2021 Release Notes" (PDF). Retrieved 2021-02-23.
  29. ^ "GTDB release 08-RS214". Genome Taxonomy Database. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  30. ^ "bac120_r214.sp_label". Genome Taxonomy Database. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  31. ^ "Taxon History". Genome Taxonomy Database. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  32. ^ Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S (May 2010). "The bacterial cell envelope". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2 (5): a000414. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000414. PMC 2857177. PMID 20452953.
  33. ^ "Pseudomonadota Garrity et al., 2021". Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Retrieved 2024-04-11.
  34. ^ Johnston C, Martin B, Fichant G, Polard P, Claverys JP (March 2014). "Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control". Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 12 (3): 181–196. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3199. PMID 24509783. S2CID 23559881.
  35. ^ Johnsborg O, Eldholm V, Håvarstein LS (December 2007). "Natural genetic transformation: prevalence, mechanisms and function". Research in Microbiology. 158 (10): 767–778. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2007.09.004. PMID 17997281.
  36. ^ a b Michod RE, Bernstein H, Nedelcu AM (May 2008). "Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens". Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 8 (3): 267–285. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.01.002. PMID 18295550.
  37. ^ a b Leão I, de Carvalho TB, Henriques V, Ferreira C, Sampaio-Maia B, Manaia CM (February 2023). "Pseudomonadota in the oral cavity: a glimpse into the environment-human nexus". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 107 (2–3): 517–534. doi:10.1007/s00253-022-12333-y. PMC 9842593. PMID 36567346.
  38. ^ Williams KP, Kelly DP (August 2013). "Proposal for a new class within the phylum Proteobacteria, Acidithiobacillia classis nov., with the type order Acidithiobacillales, and emended description of the class Gammaproteobacteria". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 63 (Pt 8): 2901–2906. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.049270-0. PMID 23334881.
  39. ^ a b Boden R, Hutt LP, Rae AW (May 2017). "Reclassification of Thiobacillus aquaesulis (Wood & Kelly, 1995) as Annwoodia aquaesulis gen. nov., comb. nov., transfer of Thiobacillus (Beijerinck, 1904) from the Hydrogenophilales to the Nitrosomonadales, proposal of Hydrogenophilalia class. nov. within the 'Proteobacteria', and four new families within the orders Nitrosomonadales and Rhodocyclales". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 67 (5): 1191–1205. doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.001927. hdl:10026.1/8740. PMID 28581923.
  40. ^ Emerson D, Rentz JA, Lilburn TG, Davis RE, Aldrich H, Chan C, et al. (August 2007). "A novel lineage of proteobacteria involved in formation of marine Fe-oxidizing microbial mat communities". PloS One. 2 (7): e667. Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..667E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000667. PMC 1930151. PMID 17668050.
  41. ^ Lambeth SM, Carson T, Lowe J, Ramaraj T, Leff JW, Luo L, et al. (December 2015). "Composition, Diversity and Abundance of Gut Microbiome in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes". Journal of Diabetes and Obesity. 2 (3): 1–7. doi:10.15436/2376-0949.15.031. PMC 4705851. PMID 26756039.
  42. ^ Michail S, Lin M, Frey MR, Fanter R, Paliy O, Hilbush B, et al. (February 2015). "Altered gut microbial energy and metabolism in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 91 (2): 1–9. doi:10.1093/femsec/fiu002. PMC 4358749. PMID 25764541.
  43. ^ a b c Jia G, Zhi A, Lai PF, Wang G, Xia Y, Xiong Z, et al. (March 2018). "The oral microbiota - a mechanistic role for systemic diseases". British Dental Journal. 224 (6): 447–455. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.217. PMID 29569607.

External links

Wikispecies has information related to Pseudomonadota.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudomonadota&oldid=1219349262"