One-party state: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
to call Singapore a one-party state effectively refuses recognition that the opposition exists, one which gets 1/3 of votes in the last election
Instantnood (talk | contribs)
32,683 edits
Yes. They get lots of votes but 4 seats at most in history, and many of them are sued and bankrupted.
Line 39: Line 39:
*[[Myanmar|Burma/Myanmar]]<sup>[[#Notes|1]]</sup>
*[[Myanmar|Burma/Myanmar]]<sup>[[#Notes|1]]</sup>
*[[Egypt]] ([[National Democratic Party (Egypt)|National Democratic Party]]) (other parties exist but face various restrictions)
*[[Egypt]] ([[National Democratic Party (Egypt)|National Democratic Party]]) (other parties exist but face various restrictions)
*[[Singapore]] ([[People's Action Party]]) (other parties exist but face governmental and judicial discrimination)
*[[Eritrea]] ([[People's Front for Democracy and Justice]])
*[[Eritrea]] ([[People's Front for Democracy and Justice]])
*[[Western Sahara]]'s [[Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic]] is composed entirely of [[Polisario Front]] members. Elections are held every three years with no opposition. In 2004, a splinter group, the [[Front Polisario Khat al-Shahid]] was announced.
*[[Western Sahara]]'s [[Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic]] is composed entirely of [[Polisario Front]] members. Elections are held every three years with no opposition. In 2004, a splinter group, the [[Front Polisario Khat al-Shahid]] was announced.

Revision as of 13:46, 5 November 2006

File:Form of government.png
States in which a single party is constitutionally linked to power are coloured in brown. Other states can also be classified as single-party on account of other legal or coercive obstacles.
Part of the Politics series
Party politics
Political spectrum
Left-Wing
Centre
Right-Wing
Platforms/Ideologies
Types
Leaders and organization
Internal elections
Party discipline
Party systems
Coalitions between parties
Lists of political parties
icon Politics portal
Part of the Politics series
Basic forms of government

List of forms of government

List of countries by system of government
Source of power
Democracy (rule by many)
Oligarchy (rule by few)
Autocracy (rule by one)
Anarchy (rule by none)
Power ideology
(socio-political ideologies)
(socio-economic ideologies)
  • Religious
  • Secular
(geo-cultural ideologies)
Power structure
Unitarism
Client state
Federalism
International relations
Related
icon Politics portal

A single-party state or one-party system or single-party system is a type of party system government in which a single political party forms the government and no other parties are permitted to run candidates for election. In most cases, parties other than the one in power are banned, although some systems guarantee a majority for one favored party that ensures the impotence of any parties relegated by law or practice (including rigged elections) to a permanent status as a miniscule and impotent minority. Even if some debate appears in the parliament, real power ordinarily lies in the unelected leadership of the dominant Party, as was the norm in the former German Democratic Republic.

Although other political parties are sometimes allowed under a single-party system, these other parties must subordinate themselves to the dominant party and cannot function as an opposition. Also, some one-party states may allow non-party members to run for legislative seats, as was the case with Taiwan's Tangwai movement in the 1970s and 1980s.

A one-party system should not be confused with a dominant-party system in which an opposition is not officially prohibited, but it is largely ineffective (has no realistic chance of becoming the government), nor should it be confused with a non-partisan democracy which prohibits all political parties.

In most cases, single-party states have arisen from fascist, Stalinist, or nationalist ideologies, particularly in the wake of independence from colonial rule. One-party systems often arise from decolonization because one party has had an overwhelmingly dominant role in liberation or in independence struggles.

Where the ruling party subscribes to a form of Marxism-Leninism or even Stalinism, the one-party system is usually called a Socialist or Communist state.

Arguments for and against a single party-system

Supporters of a single-party state often appeal to a sense of unity, strength and commonality that a single-party government can lend a state. They argue that multi-party systems introduce too much division and are unsuitable for economic and political development. This argument was particularly popular during the mid-20th century, as many developing nations sought to emulate the Soviet Union, which had transformed itself from a backward, agrarian nation into a superpower.

A common counter-argument is that one-party systems have a tendency to become rigid and unwilling to accept change, which renders them unable to deal with new situations and may result in their collapse. This counter-argument became more widely held as the 20th century drew to a close and the Soviet Union and the countries of the Warsaw Pact collapsed. Finally, one-party states have often been criticized for their disrespect towards human rights, however, this is more a reflection on the ideology of the party in power, rather than on the system itself.

Democracy, dictatorship and the single-party system

Some do not consider a single party system to be truly democratic. This is due, in part, to the perception that a single party represents a single choice for a voter, which is seen to be no choice at all. While this is often true it is not necessarily the case. For example, under Mussolini's National Fascist Party numerous candidates ran for election in each constituency, albeit under the Fascist Party.

Furthermore, the single-party system is heavily associated with dictatorship. As there is only one party, political power tends to be concentrated solely within the ruling party. As a result it is usually easy for the party in power to disregard previous laws or the constitution of the state, creating a dictatorship consisting of the party. Further contributing to the association of dictatorship and the single-party system is the fact that many dictatorships have adopted a single-party system. This may be a means of legitimizing the dictatorship under that nation's constitution, or to present a veneer of democracy to other democratic nations, or the ideology of the party may require that the dictatorship rule "by the will of the people".

Although many dictatorships represent themselves as one-party states, a one party-state is not a requirement of dictatorships. Examples of a dictatorship that is not a one-party state includes military dictatorships wherein the political power resides with the military, who exercise their authority without regard to political parties or elections.

Examples

Constitutionally-defined single party states

The following list includes the countries that are legally constituted as single-party states as of 2006 and the name of the single party in power:

Effective single-party states today

Various legal or military measures make these effectively (de facto) single-party states as of 2006:

Former single-party states

Examples include:

Notes

  • The Burmese / Myanmar military, which has ruled the country since 1988, created a "National Unity Party" to give the régime a civilian façade. An election held in 1990 was nullified. The legal status of the winner of that election, the National League for Democracy (NLD), is in flux.

See also

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=One-party_state&oldid=85845551"