Sustainable food system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The large environmental impact of agriculture – such as its greenhouse gas emissions, soil degradation, deforestation and pollinator decline effects – make the food system a critical set of processes that need to be addressed for climate change mitigation and a stable healthy environment.

A sustainable food system is a type of food system that provides healthy food to people and creates sustainable environmental, economic and social systems that surround food. Sustainable food systems start with the development of sustainable agricultural practices, development of more sustainable food distribution systems, creation of sustainable diets and reduction of food waste throughout the system. Sustainable food systems have been argued to be central to many[1] or all[2] 17 Sustainable Development Goals.[3]

Life-cycle assessment of GHG emissions for foods

Moving to sustainable food systems, including via shifting consumption to sustainable diets, is an important component of addressing the causes of climate change and adapting to it. A 2020 review conducted for the European Union found that up to 37% of global greenhouse gas emissions could be attributed to the food system, including crop and livestock production, transportation, changing land use (including deforestation) and food loss and waste.[4] Reduction of meat production, which e.g. accounts for ~60% of GHG emissions and ~75% of agriculturally used land,[5][6][7] is one major component of this change.[8]

The global food system is facing major interconnected challenges, including mitigating food insecurity, effects from climate change, biodiversity loss, malnutrition, inequity, natural resource depletion and preventable ill-health.[9][additional citation(s) needed]

The concept of sustainable food systems is frequently at the center of sustainability-focused policy programs, such as proposed Green New Deal programs.

Definition[edit]

There are many different definitions of a sustainable food system.

From a global perspective, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations describes a sustainable food system as follows:[10]

A sustainable food system (SFS) is a food system that delivers food security and nutrition for all in such a way that the economic, social and environmental bases to generate food security and nutrition for future generations are not compromised. This means that:

The American Public Health Association (APHA) defines a sustainable food system as:[11]

one that provides healthy food to meet current food needs while maintaining healthy ecosystems that can also provide food for generations to come with minimal negative impact to the environment. A sustainable food system also encourages local production and distribution infrastructures and makes nutritious food available, accessible, and affordable to all. Further, it is humane and just, protecting farmers and other workers, consumers, and communities

The European Union's Scientific Advice Mechanism defines a sustainable food system as a system that:[12]

provides and promotes safe, nutritious and healthy food of low environmental impact for all current and future EU citizens in a manner that itself also protects and restores the natural environment and its ecosystem services, is robust and resilient, economically dynamic, just and fair, and socially acceptable and inclusive. It does so without compromising the availability of nutritious and healthy food for people living outside the EU, nor impairing their natural environment

Problems with conventional food systems[edit]

The food system, mainly via Brazil's beef and soya bean exports, is a main cause of tropical deforestation[13][14][15][16]

Industrial agriculture causes environmental impacts, as well as health problems associated with obesity in the rich world and hunger in the poor world.[17] This has generated a strong movement towards healthy, sustainable eating as a major component of overall ethical consumerism.[18][19]

Conventional food systems are largely based on the availability of inexpensive fossil fuels, which is necessary for mechanized agriculture, the manufacture or collection of chemical fertilizers, the processing of food products, and the packaging of foods. Food processing began when the number of consumers started growing rapidly. The demand for cheap and efficient calories climbed, which resulted in nutrition decline.[20] Industrialized agriculture, due to its reliance on economies of scale to reduce production costs, often leads to the compromising of local, regional, or even global ecosystems through fertilizer runoff, nonpoint source pollution,[21] deforestation, suboptimal mechanisms affecting consumer product choice, and greenhouse gas emissions.[22][23]

Options[edit]

Based on the location a person may live at it will determine the amount and type of food resources accessible to them. Therefore, not everyone receives the same quality of food. In addition, conventional channels do not distribute food by emergency assistance or charity. Urban residents receive a more sustainable food production from healthier and safer sources than low-income communities. Nonetheless, conventional channels are more sustainable than charitable or welfare food resources. Even though the conventional food system provides easier access and lower prices, their food may not be the best for our environment nor health.[24]

Complications from globalization[edit]

Also, the need to reduce production costs in an increasingly global market can cause production of foods to be moved to areas where economic costs (labor, taxes, etc.) are lower or environmental regulations are more lax, which are usually further from consumer markets. For example, the majority of salmon sold in the United States is raised off the coast of Chile, due in large part to less stringent Chilean standards regarding fish feed and regardless of the fact that salmon are not indigenous in Chilean coastal waters.[25] The globalization of food production can result in the loss of traditional food systems in less developed countries, and have negative impacts on the population health, ecosystems, and cultures in those countries.[26]

Systemic structures[edit]

Furthermore, the conventional food system does not structurally facilitate sustainable patterns of food production and consumption. In decision-making associated with the conventional food system, responsibility is in practice largely thought to rest with consumers and private companies in that they are often anticipated to spend time to – voluntarily and/or without external benefit – seek to educate themselves on which behaviours and specific product-choices are sustainable, in cases where such product-information and education is publicly available, and to subsequently change their respective decision-making related to production and consumption due to prioritized assumed ethical values and sometimes health-benefits, despite substantial drawbacks to such being common. For consumers such drawbacks may include higher prices of organic foods, inappropriate relative monetary price gaps between animal-intensive diets and plant-based ones and inadequate consumer guidance by contemporary valuations. In 2020, an analysis of external climate costs of foods indicated that external greenhouse gas costs are typically highest for animal-based products – conventional and organic to about the same extent within that ecosystem subdomain – followed by conventional dairy products and lowest for organic plant-based foods and concludes contemporary monetary evaluations to be "inadequate" and policy-making that lead to reductions of these costs to be possible, appropriate and urgent.[27][28][29]

Sourcing sustainable food[edit]

A matrix of the progress in the adoption of management practices and approaches

Sustainable agriculture[edit]

At the global level the environmental impact of agribusiness is being addressed through sustainable agriculture, cellular agriculture and organic farming.

At the local level there are various movements working towards local food production, more productive use of urban wastelands and domestic gardens including permaculture, urban horticulture, local food, slow food, sustainable gardening, and organic gardening.[30][31]

Sustainable seafood[edit]

Sustainable seafood is seafood from either fished or farmed sources that can maintain or increase production in the future without jeopardizing the ecosystems from which it was acquired. The sustainable seafood movement has gained momentum as more people become aware about both overfishing and environmentally destructive fishing methods.

Substitution of meat and sustainable meat and dairy[edit]

Novel foods such as under-development[32] cultured meat and dairy, algae, existing microbial foods and ground-up insects are shown to have the potential to reduce environmental impacts[8][33][34][35] – by over 80% in a study.[36][37] Various combinations may further reduce the environmental impacts of these alternatives – for example a study explored solar-energy-driven production of microbial foods from direct air capture.[38] Alternatives are not only relevant for human consumption but also for pet food and other animal feed.

Meat reduction strategies[edit]

(Large-scale) education and awareness building are important strategies to promote more sustainable consumption styles. Other types of policy interventions could accelerate the shifts and could include "restrictions or fiscal mechanisms such as [meat] taxes".[8] In the case of fiscal mechanisms, such could be based on forms of scientific calculation of external costs (externalities currently not reflected in any way in the monetary price).[39] In the case of restrictions, such could be based on limited domestic supply or Personal (Carbon) Allowances (certificates and credits which would reward sustainable behavior).[40][41]

A review concluded that "low and moderate meat consumption levels are compatible with the climate targets and broader sustainable development, even for 10 billion people".[8]

Effects and combination of measures[edit]

A study quantified climate change mitigation potentials of 'high-income' nations shifting diets – away from meat-consumption – and restoration of the spared land, finding that if these were combined they could "reduce annual agricultural production emissions of high-income nations' diets by 61%".[42][43]

Measures which increase state revenues from meat consumption/production could enable the use of these funds for related research and development and "to cushion social hardships among low-income consumers". Meat and livestock are important sectors of the contemporary socioeconomic system, with livestock value chains employing an estimated >1.3 billion people.[8]

"Policy sequencing" to gradually extend regulations once established to other forest risk commodities (e.g. other than beef) and regions and coordinating with other importing countries could prevent ineffectiveness.[44]

Meat and dairy[edit]

Despite meat from livestock such as beef and lamb being considered unsustainable, some regenerative agriculture proponents suggest to rear livestock with mixed farming system to restore organic matter in grasslands.[45][46] Organizations such as the Canadian Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (CRSB) are looking for solutions to reduce the impact of meat production on the environment.[47] In October 2021, 17% of beef sold in Canada was certified as sustainable beef by the CRSB.[48] However, sustainable meat has led to criticism, as environmentalists point out that the meat industry excludes most of its emissions.[49][50]

Important mitigation options for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from livestock include genetic selection,[51][52] introduction of methanotrophic bacteria into the rumen,[53][54] vaccines, feeds,[55] toilet-training,[56] diet modification and grazing management.[57][58][59] Other options include shifting to ruminant-free alternatives, such as to milk substitutes and meat analogues or e.g. poultry, which generates far fewer emissions.[60]

Plant-based meat is proposed for sustainable alternatives to meat consumption. Plant-based meat emits 30%–90% less greenhouse gas than conventional meat (kg-CO2-eq/kg-meat) [61] and 72%–99% less water than conventional meat.[62] Public company Beyond Meat and privately held company Impossible Foods are examples of plant-based food production.[63] However, consulting firm Sustainalytics assured that these companies are not more sustainable than meat-processors competitors such as food processor JBS, and they don't disclose all the CO2 emissions of their supply chain.[64]

Beyond reducing negative impacts of meat production, facilitating shifts towards more sustainable meat, and facilitating reduced meat consumption (including via plant-based meat substitutes), cultured meat may offer a potentially sustainable way to produce real meat without the associated negative environmental impacts.[65][66][67][68][69]

Phase-outs, co-optimization and environmental standards[edit]

Five broad food policy categories[70]

In regards to deforestation, a study proposed kinds of "climate clubs" of "as many other states as possible taking similar measures and establishing uniform environmental standards". It suggested that "Otherwise, global problems remain unsolvable, and shifting effects will occur" and that "border adjustments [...] have to be introduced to target those states that do not participate—again, to avoid shifting effects with ecologically and economically detrimental consequences", with such "border adjustments or eco-tariffs" incentivizing other countries to adjust their standards and domestic production to join the climate club.[71] Identified potential barriers to sustainability initiatives may include contemporary trade-policy goals and competition law.[70] Greenhouse gas emissions for countries are often measured according to production, for imported goods that are produced in other countries than where they are consumed "embedded emissions" refers to the emissions of the product. In cases where such products are and remain getting imported, eco-tariffs could over time adjust prices for specific categories of products – or for specific noncollaborative polluting origin countries – such as deforestation-associated meat, foods with intransparent supply-chain origin or foods with high embedded emissions.

Agricultural productivity and environmental efficiency[edit]

Agricultural productivity (including e.g. reliability of yields) is an important component of food security[72] and increasing it sustainably (e.g. with high efficiency in terms of environmental impacts) can be an major way to decrease negative environmental impacts such as by decreasing the amount of land needed for farming or reducing environmental degradation like deforestation.[73]

Genetically engineered crops[edit]

There is research and development to engineer genetically modified crops with e.g. increased heat/drought/stress resistance, increased yields, lower water requirements, and overall lower environmental impacts.[74][75]

Novel agricultural technologies[edit]

Vertical farms, automation, solar energy production, novel alternatives to pesticides, online food delivery ICTs, and other technologies may allow to localize or modify food production alongside policies such as eco-tariffs, targeted subsidies and meat taxes.[citation needed]

Organic food[edit]

From an environmental perspective, fertilizing, overproduction and the use of pesticides in conventional farming has caused, and is causing, enormous damage worldwide to local ecosystems, soil health,[76][77][78] biodiversity, groundwater and drinking water supplies, and sometimes farmers' health and fertility.[79][80][81][82][83]

Organic farming typically reduces some environmental impact relative to conventional farming, but the scale of reduction can be difficult to quantify and varies depending on farming methods. In some cases, reducing food waste and dietary changes might provide greater benefits.[83] A 2020 study at the Technical University of Munich found that the greenhouse gas emissions of organically-farmed plant-based food were lower than conventionally-farmed plant-based food. The greenhouse gas costs of organically produced meat were approximately the same as non-organically produced meat.[84][85] However, the same paper noted that a shift from conventional to organic practices would likely be beneficial for long-term efficiency and ecosystem services, and probably improve soil over time.[85]

Local food systems[edit]

A map of wheat production (average percentage of land used for its production times average yield in each grid cell) across the world.

Local and regional food systems, commonly confused with direct marketing but both are distinct terms, come in multiple types and definitions. Local food demands from consumers within these systems include organic practices, greater nutritional value, better quality, and fresher product. Sometimes sold at lower prices, local food supply from farmers can also come at higher costs due to the environmentally sustainable production practices and through direct marketing farmers can even receive benefits for business such as consumer desires through fast product feedback.[86] Local and regional food systems also face challenges such as inadequate institutions or programs, geographic limitations, and seasonal fluctuations which can affect product demand within regions. In addition, direct marketing also faces challenges of accessibility, coordination, and awareness.[86] Farmers markets, which have increased over the past two decades, are designed for supporting local farmers in selling their fresh products to consumers who are wishing to buy. Food hubs are also similar locations where farmers deliver products and consumers come to pick them up. Consumers who wish to have weekly produce delivered can buy shares through a system called Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA).[86] However, these farmer markets also face challenges with marketing needs such as starting up, advertisement, payments, processing, and regulations.[86]

Debates over local food system efficiency and sustainability have risen as these systems decrease transportation which is a strategy for combating environmental footprints and climate change. A popular argument is the less impactful footprint of food products from local markets on communities and environment.[87] Main factors behind climate change include land use practices and greenhouse emissions as global food systems produce approximately 33% of theses emissions.[87] Compared to transportation in a local food system, a conventional system takes more fuel for energy and emits more pollution such as carbon dioxide. This transportation also includes miles for agricultural products to help with agriculture and depends on factors such as transportation sizes, modes, and fuel types. Some airplane importations have shown to be more efficient than local food systems in some cases.[87] Overall, local food systems can often support better environmental practices.

Misconception about the environmental impact of food miles[edit]

However, studies found that food miles are a relatively minor factor of carbon emissions, albeit increased food localization may also enable additional, more significant, environmental benefits such as recycling of energy, water, and nutrients.[88] For specific foods regional differences in harvest seasons may make it more environmentally friendly to import from distant regions than more local production and storage or local production in greenhouses.[89] This may vary depending on the environmental standards in the respective country, the distance of the respective countries and on a case-by-case basis for different foods.

Food distribution[edit]

In food distribution, increasing food supply is a production problem as it takes time for products to get marketed and as they wait to get distributed the food goes to waste. Despite the fact that throughout all food production an estimated 20-30% of food is wasted, there have been efforts to combat this issue such as campaigns conducted to promote limiting food waste.[90] However, due to insufficient facilities and practices as well as huge amounts of food unmarketed or harvested due to prices or quality, food is wasted through each phase of its distribution.[90] Another factor for lack of sustainability within food distribution includes transportation in combination with inadequate methods for food handling throughout the packing process. Additionally, poor or long conditions for food in storage and consumer waste add to this list of factors for inefficiency found in food distribution.[90]

Some modern tendencies in food distribution also create bounds in which problems are created and solutions must be met. One factor includes growth of large-scale producing and selling units in bulk to chain stores which displays merchandising power from large scale market organizations as well as their mergence with manufactures.[91] In response to production, another factor includes large scale distributing and buying units among manufacturers in development of food distribution which also affects producers, distributors, and consumers.[91] Another main factor involves protecting public interest which means better adaptation for product and service which results in rapid development of food distribution.[91] A further factor revolves around price maintenance which creates pressure for lower prices resulting in higher drive for lower cost throughout the whole food distribution process.[91] An additional factor comprises new changes and forms of newly invented technical processes such as developments of freezing food discovered through experiments to help with distribution efficiency. In addition to this, new technical development in distributing machinery to meet the influence of consumer demands and economic factors.[91] Lastly, another factor includes government relation to business those who petition against it in correlation with anti-trust laws due to large scale business organizations and the fear of monopoly contributing to changing public attitude.[91]

Food security, nutrition and diet[edit]

Cereal-use statistic showing an estimated large fraction of crops used as fodder

The environmental effects of different dietary patterns depend on many factors, including the proportion of animal and plant foods consumed and the method of food production.[92][93][94][95] At the same time, current and future food systems need to be provided with sufficient nutrition for not only the current population, but future population growth in light of a world affected by changing climate in the face of global warming.[96]

Nearly one in four households in the United States have experienced food insecurity in 2020–21. Even before the pandemic hit, some 13.7 million households, or 10.5% of all U.S. households, experienced food insecurity at some point during 2019, according to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That works out to more than 35 million Americans who were either unable to acquire enough food to meet their needs, or uncertain of where their next meal might come from, last year.[97]

The "global land squeeze" for agricultural land[98] also has impacts on food security.[99] Likewise, effects of climate change on agriculture can result in lower crop yields and nutritional quality due to for example drought, heat waves and flooding as well as increases in water scarcity,[100][101] pests and plant diseases. Soil conservation may be important for food security as well. For sustainability and food security, the food system would need to adapt to such current and future problems.

According to one estimate, "just four corporations control 90% of the global grain trade" and researchers have argued that the food system is too fragile due to various issues, such as "massive food producers" (i.e. market-mechanisms) having too much power and nations "polarising into super-importers and super-exporters".[102]

Production decision-making[edit]

In the food industry, especially in agriculture there has been a rise of problems towards the production of some food products. For instance, growing vegetables and fruits has become more expensive. It is difficult to grow some agricultural crops because some have a preferable climate condition for developing. There has also been an incline on food shortages as production has decreased.[103] However, the world still produces enough food for the population but not everyone receives good quality food because it's not accessible to them since it depends on their location and/or income. In addition, the amount of overweight people has increased and there are about 2 billion people that are underfed worldwide. This shows how the global food system lacks quantity and quality according to the food consumption patterns.[104]

A study estimated that "relocating current croplands to [environmentally] optimal locations, whilst allowing ecosystems in then-abandoned areas to regenerate, could simultaneously decrease the current carbon, biodiversity, and irrigation water footprint of global crop production by 71%, 87%, and 100%", with relocation only within national borders also having substantial potential.[105][106]

Policies, including policies that affect consumption may affect production-decisions, such as which foods are produced, to various degrees and in various indirect and direct ways. Individual studies have named several proposed options of such[107][108][70] and the restricted website Project Drawdown has aggregated and preliminarily evaluated some of such measures.[109]

Food waste[edit]

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), food waste is responsible for 8 percent of global human-made greenhouse gas emissions.[110] The FAO concludes that nearly 30 percent of all available agricultural land in the world – 1.4 billion hectares – is used for produced but uneaten food. The global blue water footprint of food waste is 250 km3, that is the amount of water that flows annually through the Volga or 3 times Lake Geneva.[111]

There are several factors that explain how food waste has increased globally in food systems. The main factor is population because as population increases more food production is being made but most food produce goes to waste. In addition, not all countries have the same resources to provide the best quality of food. Therefore, all throughout the world there are different ways that food is being processed. With different priorities different choices are being made to meet their most important needs. Money is another big factor that determines how long the process will take, who is working, and it is treated way differently than low income countries' food systems. However, high income countries food systems still may deal with other issues such as food security. This demonstrates how all food systems have their weaknesses and strengths. Climate change is affecting food waste to increase because the warm temperature causes crops to dry faster and have a higher risk for fires. Food waste can occur throughout any time of production.[112] According to the World Wild Life Organization,[113] since most food produced goes to landfills when it rots it causes methane to be produced. The disposal of the food has a big impact on our environment and health.[114][115]

Academic discipline[edit]

The study of sustainable food applies systems theory and methods of sustainable design towards food systems. As an interdisciplinary field, the study of sustainable food systems has been growing in the last several decades. University programs focused on sustainable food systems include:

There is a debate about "establishing a body akin to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for food systems" which "would respond to questions from policymakers and produce advice based on a synthesis of the available evidence" while identifying "gaps in the science that need addressing".[129]

Public policy[edit]

European Union[edit]

In September 2019, the European Union's Chief Scientific Advisors stated that transitioning to a sustainable food system should be a high priority for the EU:[130]

Although the availability of food is not perceived as an immediate, major concern in Europe, the challenge to ensure a long-term, safe, nutritious, and affordable supply of food, from both land and the oceans, remains. A portfolio of coordinated strategies is called for to address this challenge.

In January 2020, the EU put the transition to a sustainable food system at the core of the European Green Deal. The European Commission's 'Farm to Fork strategy for a sustainable food system', due to be published in spring 2020, is expected to lay out how European countries will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, protect biodiversity, reduce food waste and chemical pesticide use, and contribute to a circular economy.[131]

In April 2020, the EU's Scientific Advice Mechanism delivered to European Commissioners a Scientific Opinion on how to transition to a sustainable food system, informed by an evidence review report undertaken by European academies.[132]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Science Advice for Policy by European Academies (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union (PDF). Berlin: SAPEA. p. 22. doi:10.26356/sustainablefood. ISBN 978-3-9820301-7-3. {{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  2. ^ "FOOD SUSTAINABILITY: KEY TO REACH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS". BCFN Foundation: Food and Nutrition Sustainability Index. 2018-10-01. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  3. ^ "Sustainable food systems" (PDF). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
  4. ^ Science Advice for Policy by European Academies (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union (PDF). Berlin: SAPEA. p. 39. doi:10.26356/sustainablefood. ISBN 978-3-9820301-7-3. {{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  5. ^ Xu, Xiaoming; Sharma, Prateek; Shu, Shijie; Lin, Tzu-Shun; Ciais, Philippe; Tubiello, Francesco N.; Smith, Pete; Campbell, Nelson; Jain, Atul K. (September 2021). "Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods". Nature Food. 2 (9): 724–732. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x. hdl:2164/18207. ISSN 2662-1355. S2CID 240562878.
    News article: "Meat accounts for nearly 60% of all greenhouse gases from food production, study finds". The Guardian. 13 September 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  6. ^ "If the world adopted a plant-based diet we would reduce global agricultural land use from 4 to 1 billion hectares". Our World in Data. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  7. ^ "20 meat and dairy firms emit more greenhouse gas than Germany, Britain or France". The Guardian. 7 September 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  8. ^ a b c d e Parlasca, Martin C.; Qaim, Matin (5 October 2022). "Meat Consumption and Sustainability". Annual Review of Resource Economics. 14. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-032340. ISSN 1941-1340.
  9. ^ Singh, Brajesh K.; Arnold, Tom; Biermayr-Jenzano, Patricia; Broerse, Jacqueline; Brunori, Gianluca; Caron, Patrick; De Schutter, Olivier; Fan, Shenggen; Fanzo, Jessica; Fraser, Evan; Gurinovic, Mirjana; Hugas, Marta; McGlade, Jacqueline; Nellemann, Christine; Njuki, Jemimah; Sonnino, Roberta; Tuomisto, Hanna L.; Tutundjian, Seta; Webb, Patrick; Wesseler, Justus (November 2021). "Enhancing science–policy interfaces for food systems transformation". Nature Food. 2 (11): 838–842. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00406-6. ISSN 2662-1355. S2CID 243475557.
  10. ^ Sustainable food systems Concept and framework (PDF) (Report). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  11. ^ "Toward a Healthy, Sustainable Food System (Policy Number: 200712)". American Public Health Association. 2007-06-11. Retrieved 2008-08-18.
  12. ^ Science Advice for Policy by European Academies (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union (PDF). Berlin: SAPEA. p. 68. doi:10.26356/sustainablefood. ISBN 978-3-9820301-7-3. {{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  13. ^ Rajão, Raoni; Soares-Filho, Britaldo; Nunes, Felipe; Börner, Jan; Machado, Lilian; Assis, Débora; Oliveira, Amanda; Pinto, Luis; Ribeiro, Vivian; Rausch, Lisa; Gibbs, Holly; Figueira, Danilo (17 July 2020). "The rotten apples of Brazil's agribusiness". Science. 369 (6501): 246–248. doi:10.1126/science.aba6646. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 32675358. S2CID 220548355.
  14. ^ "Amazon soya and beef exports 'linked to deforestation'". BBC News. 17 July 2020.
  15. ^ zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K. H. J.; Godar, Javier; Lathuillière, Michael J.; Löfgren, Pernilla; Gardner, Toby; Vasconcelos, André; Meyfroidt, Patrick (15 December 2020). "The origin, supply chain, and deforestation risk of Brazil's beef exports". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (50): 31770–31779. doi:10.1073/pnas.2003270117. PMC 7749302. PMID 33262283.
  16. ^ McCoy, Terrence; Ledur, Júlia. "How Americans' love of beef is helping destroy the Amazon rainforest". Washington Post. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  17. ^ Garnett, Tara (February 2013). "Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions". Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 72 (1): 29–39. doi:10.1017/S0029665112002947. ISSN 0029-6651. PMID 23336559.
  18. ^ Mason, J. & Singer, P. (2006). The Way We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter. London: Random House. ISBN 1-57954-889-X
  19. ^ Rosane, Olivia (29 November 2018). "Our Food Systems Are Failing Us': 100+ Academies Call for Overhaul of Food Production". Ecowatch. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  20. ^ Nestle, Marion. (2013). Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health." Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520275966
  21. ^ (1993); Schnitkey, G.D., Miranda, M.; "The Impact of Pollution Controls on Livestock Crop producers", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
  22. ^ "Reducing global food system emissions key to meeting climate goals". phys.org. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
  23. ^ Clark, Michael A.; Domingo, Nina G. G.; Colgan, Kimberly; Thakrar, Sumil K.; Tilman, David; Lynch, John; Azevedo, Inês L.; Hill, Jason D. (6 November 2020). "Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets". Science. 370 (6517): 705–708. Bibcode:2020Sci...370..705C. doi:10.1126/science.aba7357. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 33154139. S2CID 226254942. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
  24. ^ Pothukuchi, Kameshwari; Kaufman, Jerome L. (1999-06-01). "Placing the food system on the urban agenda: The role of municipal institutions in food systems planning". Agriculture and Human Values. 16 (2): 213–224. doi:10.1023/A:1007558805953. ISSN 1572-8366. S2CID 91181337.
  25. ^ (2001); Bjorndal, T., "The Competitiveness of the Chilean Salmon Aquaculture Industry", Foundation for Research in Economics and Business Administration, Bergen, Norway
  26. ^ (1996); Kuhnlein, H.V., Receveur, O.; Dietary Change and Traditional Food Systems of Indigenous Peoples; Centre for Nutrition and the Environment of Indigenous Peoples, and School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
  27. ^ Carrington, Damian (23 December 2020). "Organic meat production just as bad for climate, study finds". The Guardian. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  28. ^ "Organic meats found to have approximately the same greenhouse impact as regular meats". phys.org. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  29. ^ Pieper, Maximilian; Michalke, Amelie; Gaugler, Tobias (15 December 2020). "Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 6117. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.6117P. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7738510. PMID 33323933. CC-BY icon.svg Available under CC BY 4.0.
  30. ^ "Earth Stats." Archived 11 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Gardensofbabylon.com. Retrieved on: 7 July 2009.
  31. ^ Holmgren, D. (March 2005). "Retrofitting the suburbs for sustainability." Archived 15 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine CSIRO Sustainability Network. Retrieved on: 7 July 2009.
  32. ^ "Lebensmittel aus dem Labor könnten der Umwelt helfen". www.sciencemediacenter.de. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
  33. ^ Rzymski, Piotr; Kulus, Magdalena; Jankowski, Maurycy; Dompe, Claudia; Bryl, Rut; Petitte, James N.; Kempisty, Bartosz; Mozdziak, Paul (January 2021). "COVID-19 Pandemic Is a Call to Search for Alternative Protein Sources as Food and Feed: A Review of Possibilities". Nutrients. 13 (1): 150. doi:10.3390/nu13010150. ISSN 2072-6643. PMC 7830574. PMID 33466241.
  34. ^ Onwezen, M. C.; Bouwman, E. P.; Reinders, M. J.; Dagevos, H. (1 April 2021). "A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat". Appetite. 159: 105058. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058. ISSN 0195-6663. PMID 33276014. S2CID 227242500.
  35. ^ Humpenöder, Florian; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Weindl, Isabelle; Lotze-Campen, Hermann; Linder, Tomas; Popp, Alexander (May 2022). "Projected environmental benefits of replacing beef with microbial protein". Nature. 605 (7908): 90–96. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04629-w. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 35508780. S2CID 248526001.
    News article: "Replacing some meat with microbial protein could help fight climate change". Science News. 5 May 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  36. ^ "Lab-grown meat and insects 'good for planet and health'". BBC News. 25 April 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
  37. ^ Mazac, Rachel; Meinilä, Jelena; Korkalo, Liisa; Järviö, Natasha; Jalava, Mika; Tuomisto, Hanna L. (25 April 2022). "Incorporation of novel foods in European diets can reduce global warming potential, water use and land use by over 80%". Nature Food. 3 (4): 286–293. doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00489-9. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
  38. ^ Leger, Dorian; Matassa, Silvio; Noor, Elad; Shepon, Alon; Milo, Ron; Bar-Even, Arren (29 June 2021). "Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (26): e2015025118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2015025118. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 8255800. PMID 34155098. S2CID 235595143.
  39. ^ Pieper, Maximilian; Michalke, Amelie; Gaugler, Tobias (15 December 2020). "Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 6117. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.6117P. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7738510. PMID 33323933. S2CID 229282344.
  40. ^ Fuso Nerini, Francesco; Fawcett, Tina; Parag, Yael; Ekins, Paul (December 2021). "Personal carbon allowances revisited". Nature Sustainability. 4 (12): 1025–1031. doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00756-w. ISSN 2398-9629. S2CID 237101457.
  41. ^ "A blueprint for scaling voluntary carbon markets | McKinsey". www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 2022-06-18.
  42. ^ "How plant-based diets not only reduce our carbon footprint, but also increase carbon capture". Leiden University. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
  43. ^ Sun, Zhongxiao; Scherer, Laura; Tukker, Arnold; Spawn-Lee, Seth A.; Bruckner, Martin; Gibbs, Holly K.; Behrens, Paul (January 2022). "Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend". Nature Food. 3 (1): 29–37. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00431-5. ISSN 2662-1355. S2CID 245867412.
  44. ^ Bager, Simon L.; Persson, U. Martin; dos Reis, Tiago N. P. (19 February 2021). "Eighty-six EU policy options for reducing imported deforestation". One Earth. 4 (2): 289–306. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.011. ISSN 2590-3322. S2CID 233930831.
  45. ^ Finney, Clare (2021-06-29). "Eat this to save the world! The most sustainable foods – from seaweed to venison". the Guardian. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
  46. ^ "What Is the Most Environmentally Friendly Meat?". Eco & Beyond. 2021-01-01. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
  47. ^ Roberrts, Wayne (2019-12-02). "Is 'sustainable beef' a load of bull?". Corporate Knights. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
  48. ^ Stockford, Alexis (2021-10-18). "Sustainable beef interest hits new peak". Manitoba Co-operator. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
  49. ^ Lazarus, Oliver; McDermid, Sonali; Jacquet, Jennifer (2021-03-25). "The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers". Climatic Change. 165 (1): 30. doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03047-7. ISSN 1573-1480. S2CID 232359749.
  50. ^ Christen, Caroline (2021-07-18). "Meat Industry Climate Claims – Criticisms and Concerns". DeSmog. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
  51. ^ "Bovine Genomics | Genome Canada". www.genomecanada.ca.
  52. ^ Airhart, Ellen. "Canada Is Using Genetics to Make Cows Less Gassy". Wired – via www.wired.com.
  53. ^ "The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review".
  54. ^ Parmar, N.R.; Nirmal Kumar, J.I.; Joshi, C.G. (2015). "Exploring diet-dependent shifts in methanogen and methanotroph diversity in the rumen of Mehsani buffalo by a metagenomics approach". Frontiers in Life Science. 8 (4): 371–378. doi:10.1080/21553769.2015.1063550. S2CID 89217740.
  55. ^ "Kowbucha, seaweed, vaccines: the race to reduce cows' methane emissions". The Guardian. 30 September 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
  56. ^ Dirksen, Neele; Langbein, Jan; Schrader, Lars; Puppe, Birger; Elliffe, Douglas; Siebert, Katrin; Röttgen, Volker; Matthews, Lindsay (13 September 2021). "Learned control of urinary reflexes in cattle to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions". Current Biology. 31 (17): R1033–R1034. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.011. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 34520709. S2CID 237497867.
  57. ^ Boadi, D (2004). "Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review". Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (3): 319–335. doi:10.4141/a03-109.
  58. ^ Martin, C. et al. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4 : pp 351-365.
  59. ^ Eckard, R. J.; et al. (2010). "Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review". Livestock Science. 130 (1–3): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.010.
  60. ^ "Livestock Production Science | Livestock Farming Systems and their Environmental Impacts | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier". www.sciencedirect.com.
  61. ^ Poore, J.; Nemecek, T. (June 2018). "Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers". Science. 360 (6392): 987–992. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 29853680. S2CID 206664954.
  62. ^ Lamb, Anthony; Green, Rhys; Bateman, Ian; Broadmeadow, Mark; Bruce, Toby; Burney, Jennifer; Carey, Pete; Chadwick, David; Crane, Ellie; Field, Rob; Goulding, Keith (May 2016). "The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture". Nature Climate Change. 6 (5): 488–492. doi:10.1038/nclimate2910. ISSN 1758-6798.
  63. ^ Greenberg, Sarah. "10 Leading Companies in Plant-Based Meat". blog.bccresearch.com. Retrieved 2021-11-08.
  64. ^ Creswell, Julie (2021-10-15). "Plant-Based Food Companies Face Critics: Environmental Advocates". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-11-08.
  65. ^ Bryant, Christopher J (3 August 2020). "Culture, meat, and cultured meat". Journal of Animal Science. 98 (8): skaa172. doi:10.1093/jas/skaa172. ISSN 0021-8812. PMC 7398566. PMID 32745186.
  66. ^ Hong, Tae Kyung; Shin, Dong-Min; Choi, Joonhyuk; Do, Jeong Tae; Han, Sung Gu (May 2021). "Current Issues and Technical Advances in Cultured Meat Production: AReview". Food Science of Animal Resources. 41 (3): 355–372. doi:10.5851/kosfa.2021.e14. ISSN 2636-0772. PMC 8112310. PMID 34017947.
  67. ^ Treich, Nicolas (1 May 2021). "Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges". Environmental and Resource Economics. 79 (1): 33–61. doi:10.1007/s10640-021-00551-3. ISSN 1573-1502. PMC 7977488. PMID 33758465.
  68. ^ Bryant, Christopher J (1 August 2020). "Culture, meat, and cultured meat". Journal of Animal Science. 98 (8): skaa172. doi:10.1093/jas/skaa172. PMC 7398566. PMID 32745186.
  69. ^ Treich, Nicolas (May 2021). "Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges". Environmental and Resource Economics. 79 (1): 33–61. doi:10.1007/s10640-021-00551-3. PMC 7977488. PMID 33758465.
  70. ^ a b c Saviolidis, Nína M.; Olafsdottir, Gudrun; Nicolau, Mariana; Samoggia, Antonella; Huber, Elise; Brimont, Laura; Gorton, Matthew; von Berlepsch, David; Sigurdardottir, Hildigunnur; Del Prete, Margherita; Fedato, Cristina; Aubert, Pierre-Marie; Bogason, Sigurdur G. (January 2020). "Stakeholder Perceptions of Policy Tools in Support of Sustainable Food Consumption in Europe: Policy Implications". Sustainability. 12 (17): 7161. doi:10.3390/su12177161. ISSN 2071-1050.
  71. ^ Stubenrauch, Jessica; Garske, Beatrice; Ekardt, Felix; Hagemann, Katharina (January 2022). "European Forest Governance: Status Quo and Optimising Options with Regard to the Paris Climate Target". Sustainability. 14 (7): 4365. doi:10.3390/su14074365. ISSN 2071-1050.
  72. ^ Mbow et al. 2019, p. 454.
  73. ^ "Sustainable Intensification for Smallholders". Project Drawdown. 2020-02-06. Retrieved 2020-10-16.
  74. ^ Kovak, Emma; Blaustein-Rejto, Dan; Qaim, Matin (8 February 2022). "Genetically modified crops support climate change mitigation". Trends in Plant Science. 27 (7): 627–629. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.01.004. ISSN 1360-1385. PMID 35148945.
  75. ^ Liang, Chanjuan (2016). "Genetically Modified Crops with Drought Tolerance: Achievements, Challenges, and Perspectives". Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 2: Molecular and Genetic Perspectives. Springer International Publishing: 531–547. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32423-4_19. ISBN 978-3-319-32421-0.
  76. ^ Reeve, J. R.; Hoagland, L. A.; Villalba, J. J.; Carr, P. M.; Atucha, A.; Cambardella, C.; Davis, D. R.; Delate, K. (1 January 2016). "Chapter Six - Organic Farming, Soil Health, and Food Quality: Considering Possible Links". Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press. 137: 319–367. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2015.12.003.
  77. ^ Tully, Katherine L.; McAskill, Cullen (1 September 2020). "Promoting soil health in organically managed systems: a review". Organic Agriculture. 10 (3): 339–358. doi:10.1007/s13165-019-00275-1. ISSN 1879-4246. S2CID 209429041.
  78. ^ M. Tahat, Monther; M. Alananbeh, Kholoud; A. Othman, Yahia; I. Leskovar, Daniel (January 2020). "Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture". Sustainability. 12 (12): 4859. doi:10.3390/su12124859.
  79. ^ Brian Moss (12 February 2008). "Water pollution by agriculture". Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363 (1491): 659–66. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2176. PMC 2610176. PMID 17666391.
  80. ^ "Social, Cultural, Institutional and Economic Aspects of Eutrophication". UNEP. Retrieved 2018-10-14.
  81. ^ Aktar; et al. (March 2009). "Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards". Interdiscip Toxicol. 2 (1): 1–12. doi:10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7. PMC 2984095. PMID 21217838.
  82. ^ Sharon Oosthoek (17 June 2013). "Pesticides spark broad biodiversity loss". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13214. S2CID 130350392. Retrieved 2018-10-14.
  83. ^ a b Seufert, Verena; Ramankutty, Navin (2017). "Many shades of gray — The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture". Science Advances. 3 (3): e1602638. Bibcode:2017SciA....3E2638S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602638. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 5362009. PMID 28345054.
  84. ^ "Organic meats found to have approximately the same greenhouse impact as regular meats". phys.org. Retrieved 2020-12-31.
  85. ^ a b Pieper, Maximilian; Michalke, Amelie; Gaugler, Tobias (2020-12-15). "Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 6117. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.6117P. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7738510. PMID 33323933.
  86. ^ a b c d O’Hara, Jeffrey K. "Description of Local Food Systems." Union of Concerned Scientists, 2011, pp. 6–13
  87. ^ a b c Shindelar, Rachel. "The Ecological Sustainability of Local Food Systems." RCC Perspectives, no. 1, 2015, pp. 19–24.
  88. ^ Yang, Yi; Campbell, J. Elliott (1 March 2017). "Improving attributional life cycle assessment for decision support: The case of local food in sustainable design". Journal of Cleaner Production. 145: 361–366. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.020. ISSN 0959-6526. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  89. ^ Edwards-Jones, Gareth (2010). "Does eating local food reduce the environmental impact of food production and enhance consumer health?". Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 69 (4): 582–591. doi:10.1017/S0029665110002004. ISSN 1475-2719. PMID 20696093.
  90. ^ a b c Kling, William. "Food Waste in Distribution and Use." Journal of Farm Economics, vol. 25, no. 4, 1943, pp. 848–859.
  91. ^ a b c d e f Pelz, V. H. "Modern Tendencies in Food Distribution." Journal of Farm Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, 1930, pp. 301–310.
  92. ^ McMichael A.J.; Powles J.W.; Butler C.D.; Uauy R. (September 2007). "Food, Livestock Production, Energy, Climate change, and Health" (PDF). Lancet. 370 (9594): 1253–63. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61256-2. hdl:1885/38056. PMID 17868818. S2CID 9316230. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2010. Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
  93. ^ Baroni L.; Cenci L.; Tettamanti M.; Berati M. (February 2007). "Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Various Dietary Patterns Combined with Different Food Production Systems" (PDF). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 61 (2): 279–86. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522. PMID 17035955. S2CID 16387344. Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
  94. ^ Steinfeld H., Gerber P., Wassenaar T., Castel V., Rosales M., de Haan, C. (2006). "Livestock's Long Shadow – Environmental Issues and Options". Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
  95. ^ Heitschmidt R.K.; Vermeire L.T.; Grings E.E. (2004). "Is Rangeland Agriculture Sustainable?". Journal of Animal Science. 82 (E–Suppl): E138–146. doi:10.2527/2004.8213_supplE138x (inactive 28 February 2022). PMID 15471792.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2022 (link) Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
  96. ^ "Sustainable food systems – UNSCN". www.unscn.org. Retrieved 2019-11-27.
  97. ^ Silva, Christianna (2020-09-27). "Food Insecurity In The U.S. By The Numbers". NPR. Retrieved 2021-10-19.
  98. ^ "What is the Global Land Squeeze?". Land & Carbon Lab. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  99. ^ Hanson, Craig; Ranganathan, Janet (14 February 2022). "How to Manage the Global Land Squeeze? Produce, Protect, Reduce, Restore". Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  100. ^ "Water scarcity predicted to worsen in more than 80% of croplands globally this century". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
  101. ^ Liu, Xingcai; Liu, Wenfeng; Tang, Qiuhong; Liu, Bo; Wada, Yoshihide; Yang, Hong (April 2022). "Global Agricultural Water Scarcity Assessment Incorporating Blue and Green Water Availability Under Future Climate Change". Earth's Future. 10 (4). Bibcode:2022EaFut..1002567L. doi:10.1029/2021EF002567. S2CID 248398232.
  102. ^ "The banks collapsed in 2008 – and our food system is about to do the same | George Monbiot". The Guardian. 19 May 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  103. ^ Rushcheva, D. (November 2, 2020). "Food Production and National Food Security: Situation, Problems and Prospects". Trakia Journal of Sciences. 18 (Suppl.1): 346–349. doi:10.15547/tjs.2020.s.01.058. S2CID 244351877.
  104. ^ Capone, Roberto (2016). "Relations Between Food and Nutrition Security, Diets and Food Systems". Agriculture and Forestry. 62: 49–58. doi:10.17707/AgricultForest.62.1.05.
  105. ^ "Relocating farmland could turn back clock twenty years on carbon emissions, say scientists". University of Cambridge. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
  106. ^ Beyer, Robert M.; Hua, Fangyuan; Martin, Philip A.; Manica, Andrea; Rademacher, Tim (10 March 2022). "Relocating croplands could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of global food production". Communications Earth & Environment. 3 (1): 49. Bibcode:2022ComEE...3...49B. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00360-6. ISSN 2662-4435. S2CID 247322845.
  107. ^ Lindgren, Elisabet; Harris, Francesca; Dangour, Alan D.; Gasparatos, Alexandros; Hiramatsu, Michikazu; Javadi, Firouzeh; Loken, Brent; Murakami, Takahiro; Scheelbeek, Pauline; Haines, Andy (1 November 2018). "Sustainable food systems—a health perspective". Sustainability Science. 13 (6): 1505–1517. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0586-x. ISSN 1862-4057. PMC 6267166. PMID 30546484.
  108. ^ Wynes, Seth; Nicholas, Kimberly A; Zhao, Jiaying; Donner, Simon D (1 November 2018). "Measuring what works: quantifying greenhouse gas emission reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use". Environmental Research Letters. 13 (11): 113002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 115133659.
  109. ^ "Food, Agriculture, and Land Use @ProjectDrawdown". Project Drawdown. 5 February 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  110. ^ "Food wastage footprint & Climate Change" (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization.
  111. ^ "Food wastage footprint, impacts on natural resources" (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization.
  112. ^ Bond, M.; Meacham, T.; Bhunnoo, R.; Benton, TG. (2013). Food Waste Within Global Food Systems.
  113. ^ "Fight climate change by preventing food waste". World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved 2021-03-30.
  114. ^ Tonini, Davide; Albizzati, Paola Federica; Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard (2018-06-01). "Environmental impacts of food waste: Learnings and challenges from a case study on UK". Waste Management. 76: 744–766. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.032. ISSN 0956-053X. PMID 29606533. S2CID 4555820.
  115. ^ von Massow, Michael; Parizeau, Kate; Gallant, Monica; Wickson, Mark; Haines, Jess; Ma, David W. L.; Wallace, Angela; Carroll, Nicholas; Duncan, Alison M. (2019). "Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Household Food Waste". Frontiers in Nutrition. 6: 143. doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00143. ISSN 2296-861X. PMC 6738328. PMID 31552260.
  116. ^ "Sustainable Food Systems". Masters of the Environment. 2018-08-10. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  117. ^ rebecca (2019-05-23). "Sustainable Food Systems Certificate". Harvard Extension School. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  118. ^ "Sustainable Food Systems | University of Delaware". www.udel.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  119. ^ "Sustainable Food Systems | Nutrition & Dietetics | Mesa Community College". www.mesacc.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  120. ^ "Breakthrough Leaders for Sustainable Food Systems – University Of Vermont Continuing & Distance Education". learn.uvm.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  121. ^ "Food Systems". www.uvm.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  122. ^ "Sustainable Food Systems Degree Vermont | Sustainable Food Systems". Sterling College. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  123. ^ "Graduate Certificate in Sustainable Food Systems – Sustainable Food Systems Initiative". 6 August 2014. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  124. ^ "Portland State Graduate Certificate in Sustainable Food Systems | Welcome". www.pdx.edu. Retrieved 2020-02-07.
  125. ^ "Portland State College of Urban & Public Affairs: Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies & Planning | Food Systems Advising Pathway". www.pdx.edu. Retrieved 2020-02-07.
  126. ^ "Postgraduate courses | Institute for Sustainable Food | The University of Sheffield". www.sheffield.ac.uk. Retrieved 2020-04-14.
  127. ^ "Grad Certificate | UGA Sustainable Food Systems Initiative". site.extension.uga.edu. Retrieved 2021-01-11.
  128. ^ "CIA Online Master's in Sustainable Food Systems". www.ciachef.edu. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
  129. ^ "The war in Ukraine is exposing gaps in the world's food-systems research". Nature. 604 (7905): 217–218. 12 April 2022. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00994-8. PMID 35414667. S2CID 248129049. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  130. ^ Group of Chief Scientific Advisors (25 September 2019). "Scoping paper: Towards an EU Sustainable Food System" (PDF). EU Scientific Advice Mechanism.
  131. ^ Binns, John (2019-12-10). "Farm to Fork strategy for sustainable food". Food Safety – European Commission. Retrieved 2020-04-14.
  132. ^ "The shift to a more sustainable food system is inevitable. Here's how to make it happen | SAPEA". www.sapea.info. Retrieved 2020-04-14.

Cited sources[edit]

  • Mbow, C.; Rosenzweig, C.; Barioni, L. G.; Benton, T.; et al. (2019). "Chapter 5: Food Security" (PDF). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. p. 454.

Further reading[edit]