Template talk:Did you know/Approved/week-2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the page of all the approved nominations for the "Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the third-most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the post-expand include size limit.

Strategion[edit]

(
)
  • Source: At this time, while the Emperor Theodosious [II] was in procession to the public granaries, he was pelted with stones by a hungry populace... Westbrook (2013), p. 10
  • ALT1: ... that the merchants of sheep were allowed to sell their livestock in the Strategion in Constantinople until the first day of Lent? Source: C'est au Strategion...que les merchands de moutons peuvent vendre leurs betes, et cela jusqu'au premier jour de careme. Janin (1950), p. 96
  • Reviewed: Fang Gan
Created by Alessandro57 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Alex2006 (talk) 07:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was created yesterday, so is new enough. It is much more than long enough and properly uses in-line citations. AGF on proper paraphrasing of the offline sources was used. Both hooks are interesting and cited in-line, with the first one being better I think (though perhaps need some commas?). The only thing holding up this review, Alessandro57, is that the QPQ hasn't been done yet. SilverserenC 21:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see that you're still editing, Alessandro57. Were you planning on doing a QPQ review or is this nomination abandoned? SilverserenC 23:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No worries, of course I am planning a QPQ. I am still recovering from last month's two QPQ per hook ... ;-) Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 03:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alessandro57 and Silver seren: There are an awful lot of single sentence paragraphs, which should be avoided per WP:PARAGRAPH - granted 'presentable' is nebulous to the point of otiosity but I think some of these can be knocked together.--Launchballer 21:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Silver seren and Launchballer: You were right, done! Alex2006 (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My objection has been resolved.--Launchballer 09:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Josephine Kenyon[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Feel free to share your alt blurbs.
Created by Xoak (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

X (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Reviewing... New enough, long enough, Earwig's copyvio <1%. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... Thank you for this interesting article. It reads well and follows the main refernece closely. QPQ not required. Hook is in article and referenced, but is quite general. Can you think of a more specific hook to her? Whispyhistory (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALT1: ... that editions of Josephine Kenyon's book Healthy Babies Are Happy Babies increasingly moved away from their original recommendations of rigid scheduling to "on-demand" scheduling based on the child? Source: Opitz, Donald: 'During the course of the book’s five revisions ... her trend in pediatric advice shifted from an emphasis on following rigid schedules to attending to a child’s “on-demand” schedule.' Possible Alt, 198 characters, suggested by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you... looks good. How about a hook containing 'good housekeeping'? There may be something in this reference p. 102. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Approving ALT2... I don't think the quote marks are needed as it appears a common term when I searched literature on the topic. Possibly link the book. The hook is in the article and in the main source. Thank you both. Whispyhistory (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong v Inter Miami[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: This is my first DYK nomination so please remind me if there is anything missing or should be improved. Thanks.
Created by Cypp0847 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

~~ J. Dann 15:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • What a ride that article was. QPQ not needed. Earwig has a high score for copyvio detection, but that's entirely due to Messi's paragraph-long statement in the "Departure and Japan trip" section, which has an inline citation to the flagged source. Referencing is adequate and length/newness criteria fulfilled. Hook is definitely interesting and cited in source, not cited inline as exact phrasing but separately so. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Cypp0847 and Juxlos: I have tagged the article for copyediting, as there are grammar-related issues throughout the article (tenses, for instance, are very often incorrect). This needs to be resolved before a DYK run. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwell–Paradise House[edit]

(
)
The Ludwell–Paradise House, Rockefeller's "antique"
The Ludwell–Paradise House, Rockefeller's "antique"
  • Source: Kopper, Philip (1986). Colonial Williamsburg. New York City: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.
Created by Pbritti (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Pbritti (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • AGF on offline book source. Article expansion is sufficient and recent, QPQ done. No copyvio is detected, Earwig flags a bibliography item and a direct quote only. Hook is good. To DYKA you go. Juxlos (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rosal, Sutherland[edit]

(
)
  • ... that Rosal was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver, shortly before it was deserted entirely?
  • Reviewed:
Created by DandelionAndBurdock (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

-- D'n'B-t -- 16:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, and properly sourced. No QPQ needed. Earwig found no problematic copied wording. Good-enough hook, but one must synthesize a couple pieces of information in the article to obtain it: the "largest township" part is at the end of the town section, dated to the early 19th century, while the "deserted" part is at the end of the "clearance" section. In fact both facts are adjacent in the "Maverick Guide to Scotland" source, with much tighter dating (largest in 1815; cleared between 1814 and 1818) and to avoid problems with WP:SYN the article would benefit from making them adjacent somewhere within it, footnoted to that source. Also, "deserted" is maybe a euphemism for what happened. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks David. What if the sentence in the Town section said "Before the clearance, it was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver"? That would would be consistent with the Maverick Guide guide source and not change up the current before-during-after structure. I could also change the sentence in the Clearance section to say "completely deserted by 1818" to avoid any ambiguity.
I think "deserted" is, from a NPOV, the end result of what happened, it describes what's left. You could say "forcibly depopulated" or something but I think "deserted" is clear enough and used in the sources. -- D'n'B-t -- 18:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To me, "deserted" is an accurate and neutral description of the state of the place now, but not of the process by which it reached that state. How about
  • ALT1 ... that before its inhabitants were evicted, Rosal was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver?
but that would require a new reviewer as I can't both propose hooks and approve them. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be happy with that ALT1, (although with the link just saying "Rosal" for preference). -- D'n'B-t -- 19:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was an unintentional omission. I've piped the link as you originally did now. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 short enough, cited, and interesting, though may be worth adding "in Scotland" per WP:DYKINT. Let's roll.--Launchballer 06:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a Devastating Turn of Events[edit]

(
)
  • Source: From NME: "But it was a later trip to LA in early 2023 where Chinouriri’s anxieties began to amplify. Emerging musicians often take trips to LA for writing sessions; some fly out four or so times a year, but visit for no more than a fortnight. Chinouriri, who has a fear of flying, elected to stay for five."
  • ALT1: ... that with her debut album What a Devastating Turn of Events, Rachel Chinouriri aimed to tackle the underrepresentation of Black female artists in the indie scene? Source: From NME: "Chinouriri wants to recreate the visual and sonic aesthetics of that era on her debut. The noughties represents a period of her life where she was eagerly learning about British pop culture icons such as Alexa Chung, Oasis, The Libertines. Taking inspiration from this era is Chinouriri’s way to reclaim her position in British society and the indie scene, where Black womanhood is routinely ignored and misrepresented."
  • ALT2: ... that Rachel Chinouriri decided to include the English flag on the cover art of What a Devastating Turn of Events in order to celebrate her Black British identity? Source: From The Guardian: "Chinouriri, however, decided to use the St George’s Cross as an act of reclamation. 'For Black people and POC, that flag’s not something people are proud of,' she says, adding that some people around her discouraged her from using it on her album cover. But on her single 'The Hills', Chinouriri sings about rediscovering her British identity after feeling lonely during a period spent in Los Angeles. 'No matter the trauma I’ve had from being raised in the UK, being Black British and being the only Black person in my neighbourhood, it’s made me the person who I am,' she says. 'There is a culture within being Black British that is distinct and strong, and harbours creativity.' Using the flag is 'a celebration – taking back this thing and saying: you can’t get rid of me'."
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Saturn (SZA song)
  • Comment: Thank you to QuietHere and all the people who took a look at this article! The album will actually be released next Friday, so I don't have any specific request for the date of publication. I must address that I've "recycled" my QPQ submission from a previous entry of mine that was rejected (due to my big mistake): is that still OK?
Moved to mainspace by Oltrepier (talk) and QuietHere (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Oltrepier (talk) 19:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment: Not a review, but I find ALT0 nothingburgery, and ALT2 would be more interesting if it read "Black British identity".--Launchballer 09:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I agree on ALT2, so I've slightly edited it accordingly. Thanks for the feedback! Oltrepier (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, well-sourced hooks that summarize the quotes well. Particularly, ALT1 and ALT 2 are the most interesting. This is my first review, so I'm not sure about the QPQ. Another review is needed.Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 17:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be inclined to take Saturn as a QPQ, on the grounds that it hasn't been 'paid', i.e. 2024 NCAA Division I women's basketball championship game wasn't actually reviewed. The Professional ratings table interferes with the Track listing - any chance that section could be expanded?--Launchballer 18:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer and Heidi Pusey BYU: Thank you for the feedback! Yes, that section is definitely too short at the moment, and I'll try to work on it as soon as possible. Oltrepier (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Done! This is the first time I edited an album article from scratch, so let me know if there's anything else I should fix! Oltrepier (talk) 12:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Heidi Pusey BYU: I agree with Launchballer, the QPQ can be used here. Go ahead and take credit for the review. Since Alt2 seems to be the preferred hook, I'm striking the others. BTW, I checked this over and will put the check down for you. --evrik (talk) 02:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Wesker[edit]

(
)
Created by Greenish Pickle! (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations. Article has been promoted into GA last week (7 days).

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 01:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Reviewing this:
  • 1. Each boldlinked article is new enough.
  • 2. Each boldlinked article is new enough.
  • 3. Every source is reliable and approved by the project.
  • 4. It is presentable.
  • 5. Hook is presented with a reliable source.
  • 6. ALT 2 seems more interesting than the other ones since it involves his creation and portrayal. The other ones seems to be interpretations of third party sources.
  • 7. The two non-free images are given sources.
  • 8. The user has less than 5 DYK nominations found.
  • 9. There are no issues.

Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: If this hook is approved, please post the green tick below, using this code: {{subst:DYKyes}}. If not, please add the question mark below, using this code: {{subst:DYK?}}. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only issue I see is the hook. ALT 2 is the only written from a creator's pespective rather than third party source which will interest more people.Tintor2 (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC) @Greenish Pickle!: Pinging just in case. Sorry for the delay. It's been since I reviewed a DYK nomination. I think I already suggested ALT 2 in discord.Tintor2 (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tintor2 Hey, I mean Alt 2 is fine. I don't have anything to do here actually. If you think Alt 2 is fine then you can replace it now with green tick like the user said above. Thanks. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Gusti Ngurah Jaya Negara[edit]

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 222 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new, long enough, neutral and presentable. It cites sources inline. All sources are in foreign language. The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its size is within limit. It is partly cited inline. The sentence ending with "... was laid off in 1998" needs to be cited inline. I understand from the article that he is somewhat the co-mayor. If it is correct, then the hook needs to be altered. Please advise. QPQ was done. CeeGee 11:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CeeGee: Inline citation added. The guy is the mayor - not entirely sure what you meant by comayor, but his running mate became vice mayor. Juxlos (talk) 00:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Juxlos: Thanks for adding the missing reference. The article does not say expilictly that he is the mayor and his mate is the vice mayor. It is said "they", so I understand that both are the mayors. Is it possible to clarifythat in the article? CeeGee 08:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. Everything is fine now. Good to go by AGF. CeeGee 05:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sunlight before signing[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by GobsPint (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GobsPint (talk) 06:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment: The article is relatively short and needs further development before being highlighted; the topic is an interesting one, but the hook could do with being shorter. Perhaps,

Alt1 ... that Barack Obama promised to make bills freely available online for public consultation under Sunlight before signing? Klbrain (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, numerically it's over the limit, but as written, this article would deserve {{no lead}}, and one should be added.--Launchballer 19:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reformatted the article into sections and sommething akin to a weak lead. Feeback is welcoem.GobsPint (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My concern is assuaged.--Launchballer 07:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!GobsPint (talk) 18:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Lots of good comments but nobody appears to have reviewed. So I guess I will take it on.4meter4 (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is new enough. It's long enough even after removing the large blocks of quoted text. Earwig did flag copyright violation, but this was due to the large blocks of quoted text which have been properly attributed and are within policy. No close paraphrasing or copyright found, and the article appears to be within policy in all other measures. Hook fact and length both check out for the original and Alt1 hooks. I leave it to the promoter to decide which hook wording they prefer to promote.4meter4 (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robyn Gigl[edit]

(
)
Created by Bridget (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Bridget (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long and new enough, and properly sourced. There are no BLP issues. Both hooks are interesting. ALT0 is properly cited but I'm unsure about ALT1. Waiting on that QPQ. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 15:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi LunaEclipse, I'm definitely leaning more towards ALT0, since it's focused on the critical reception of her work featuring a trans character, rather than the focus solely on the fact that Gigl and her character are trans. I've just added a DYK that I just reviewed. Thanks for taking a look at this! Best, Bridget (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The facts for ALT1 are supported but the phrasing seems a little awkward. How about
  • This one is great, but I'm kind of thinking the same thing as ALT1 – maybe we can come up with a hook that is centered on her literary work (rather than her transition)? Bridget (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) (edited 23:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Elizabeth Seifert[edit]

(
)
  • ... that Elizabeth Seifert quit medical school after only one year as she was denied a medical degree due to her gender, went on to publish more than 80 novels in her career?
Created by Xoak (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

X (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article created 27 April. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are all interesting and sourced. QPQ is not required. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lineage (anthropology)[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Me Da Wikipedian (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

In the article, and sign your posts.--Launchballer 16:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Needed to anyway for some minor stuff, how is it now? @Launchballer: Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still needs another 42 characters. You should consider installing WP:DYKcheck so you can check yourself.--Launchballer 17:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now added some stuff about the 2 types of ambilineal, which I may expand into there own sectrions at some point. Hows this now @Launchballer: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me Da Wikipedian (talk • contribs)
How are you remembering to put my username in your comments and not- anyway, length requirement met. Full review needed.--Launchballer 20:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do said review, and if not who and when will do it @Launchballer:Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It won't be me any time soon, I have a policy of doing my QPQs oldest first. Any other editor is free to review this in the interim.--Launchballer 07:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Nominated in time. 5x expansion. No QPQ need. Current hook as written is not reflected in the text of the article. Another hook please. --evrik (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nom is blocked and based on behavior likely a sock (but I haven't figured out who yet). Not to mention multiple issues with submission noted above. We have enough work to do, we don't need to be wasting time on this. RoySmith (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can however respond, here, and I will. It was in the article when it was submitted. Anyways, here is a new one:Did you know that lineages often have religious significance, determining ones religion and there role in that religion
https://collegeofarms.euclid.int/tracing-roots-the-significance-of-family-trees-in-traditional-societies/
. Also, I do not appreciate unfounded allegations by @RoySmith: that I am wasting their time and a sock. Thank you. @Evrik @Me Da Wikipedian: (talk) 20:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

I am posting the above from this this post. The user has suggested:

  • Alt2 ... that lineages often have religious significance, determining ones religion and their role in that religion?
I am AGF that this user will be welcomed back to the fold. --evrik (talk) 21:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Griffiths[edit]

(
)
  • Source: "one of the first two British women to cross the Antarctic Circle" [2]
  • ALT1: ... that librarian Anne Griffiths was one of the few non-royals invited to Prince Philip's 90th birthday lunch? Source: "In 2011 she was one of the few non-royal guests invited to his 90th birthday luncheon at Windsor Castle." [3]
  • Reviewed: [[]]
5x expanded by Mystery Merrivale (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Mystery Merrivale (talk) 19:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: AGF for paywalled sources. Everything looks solid!  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boroline[edit]

(
)
  • ... that the antiseptic cream Boroline was marketed to appeal to nationalistic sentiments?
5x expanded by Sohom Datta (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Sohom (talk) 16:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article recently expanded. No copyvio detected, and QPQ is done. Hook is verified in sources and cited inline. Preference for original hook. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 05:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Lander[edit]

(
)
Defusing explosives, 1943, photographed by Lander
Defusing explosives, 1943, photographed by Lander
  • ... that Olga Lander used a fixed 50 mm focal length camera, requiring her to work close to the dangerous war-time subjects she photographed (example pictured)?
Created by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 00:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting life and work, on fine sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I approve the hook, and it goes well with the current trend for short "hooky" wording. I wonder, however, if - since her name doesn't give much clue to where she comes from - some hint at place and/or time might add interest. I found interesting, for example, that she took pics in both world wars. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How about including her photo, which - with a year in the caption - would add some time? It would illustrate the hook perfectly although it is not strictly she who is pictured. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gerda Arendt: I've added the photo as you suggest. Regarding the hook info, if you don't tell them everything, they have to click through to find out, right? Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the image which tells what I missed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    adding to approval: the image is licensed and a great illustration of the kind of photos she took. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation of the Communist Party of India[edit]

(
)
Banner of the Communist Party of India
Banner of the Communist Party of India
  • Source: Kiran Saxena (1990). Trade Union Movement and the National Movement. South Asian Publishers. p. 128. ISBN 978-81-7003-116-1.
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 380 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Soman (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: This is a very nicely-written and well-researched article, with quite the interesting hook for DYK. Excellent work on this! Only real issue is that it's currently tagged as an orphan, this can be remedied by linking to this article from at least one other article. Ping me once this is done and I'll be happy to approve this. (I'm also not convinced that the picture is necessary for this kind of a hook, but its inclusion is up to the DYK coordinators) Grnrchst (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Lord Chamberlain's plays[edit]

(
)
  • ... that the Lord Chamberlain was the official theatrical censor in England for over 200 years until 1968 with the power to prevent any new play from being performed, often for blasphemy or indecency?
  • ALT1: ... that the Lord Chamberlain's plays are a historical archive of play scripts curated through theatrical censorship that provide a unique insight to attitudes to race and sexuality?
  • Reviewed:
Created by OAnick (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Nick Sheppard (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Launchballer

  • fair point, novice at DYK…is update any good?

Nick Sheppard (talk)

It's customary to propose new ALTs instead of replacing them. Full review needed.--Launchballer 18:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've suggested a possibility of linking for the original alt. Someone else may have a better idea of whether this complies appropriately with best practice for formatting a DYK hook. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: I prefer ALT1 to ALT. The hook length is acceptable for both. ALT has a couple of issues: the title of the article does not appear, but more importantly, the idea of the office's powers is not clearly conveyed: it currently says "for over 200 years until 1968 with the power to prevent ANY new play from being performed". However, those powers were somewhat restricted after 1843, so to say ANY new play could be restricted after 1843 is perhaps misleading. This hook could be rephrased slightly, but at this point, for both reasons, I recommend ALT1 instead. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 23:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peale's Philadelphia Museum[edit]

(
)
The Exhumation of the Mastadon
The Exhumation of the Mastadon
  • ... that exhibits at Peale's Philadelphia Museum included the first known skeleton of a mastodon (excavation pictured)? Source: Semonin, Paul (2000). American Monster: How the Nation's First Prehistoric Creature Became a Symbol of National Identity. NYU Press. p. 5 "Charles Willson Peale and his son Rembrandt excavated the first complete skeleton of the American incognitum, or mastodon" "when the mounted skeleton was placed in their Philadelphia Museum for public viewing".
Created by TSventon (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

TSventon (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review:


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I don't see anything in the guidelines about QPQs needing to be done recently, but this one was done in 2021 and hasn't been used as a QPQ by the nominator before. If that's okay, then this nom is good to go. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voorts, thank you for the review, I tried to do a few QPQs before I needed them and they have got rather old. Fortunately WP:QPQ says QPQs do not expire and may be used at any time for a future DYK nomination. TSventon (talk) 00:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Voorts and TSventon: I cannot confirm in any sources that this was the first known skeleton. Maybe first "complete" can be investigated if sources support? I do see a source for "Peale eventually founded the first natural history museum in the United States". But I do not know about the reliability of the source (czasopisma) - that can be investigated for a hook idea, or you can introduce a different hook. Bruxton (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts and Bruxton: I was trying to put the hook in my own words and overdid the paraphrasing. When Semonin says the skeleton was complete I think he meant almost complete so I have reworded the article and the hook. Peale's museum as "the first natural history museum in the United States" is arguable, but would need more work. This argued it was not.

TSventon (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It is difficult to find the hook because it is not explicit in the article. I did find the two parts to the hook in The Peale Mastodon section so ALT1 works. Bruxton (talk) 14:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The hook is explicit but unreferenced in the lead, I could add a reference to the Smithsonian article there if that made things clearer. In the body one of the sentences was not immediately followed by a reference, so I fixed that.
By the way, on the first museum, I have seen things like the first successful public museum of natural history, but that would need to be discussed in the article and is not particularly hooky. TSventon (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aza Arnold[edit]

(
)
  • ... that within years of Aza Arnold inventing a device to improve cotton roving, it was plagiarized across the United States and Europe?
  • Source: Jeremy, D. J. (1981). Technological diffusion—the case of the differential gear. Industrial Archaeology Review, 5(3), 217–227. doi:10.1179/iar.1981.5.3.217
Created by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 05:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. AGF on the offline source. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DellaXOZ[edit]

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 225 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 12:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Hook fact checks out to source. Strong preference for ALT0 as more distinctive than ALT1 or ALT2. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Southeast Asia heat wave[edit]

(
)
Created by Robertsky (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 11:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: recently created, QPQ done, interesting hook that is cited. Looks good to go, but please expand the lede a little bit. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky and PSA: An article with a lede that short would deserve {{lead too short}}, so yeah, what Makeandtoss said.--Launchballer 09:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded the lead, sought to provide an overview without simply repeating country by country. CMD (talk) 07:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Better, although I've just noticed that the Laos and Malaysia sections are pretty short. Possibly worth merging into something like 'Other countries'?--Launchballer 07:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure about merging countries, I would expect those sections to be where the article might grow (and where editors who click on DYKs might be tempted to pitch in?). There is some specific reporting, for example Reliefweb page on Malaysia. CMD (talk) 08:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still think that (at least) the Malaysia section could be expanded somewhat (in fact I'm pretty sure it would deserve {{expand}}).--Launchballer 10:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Yeampierre[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by CaptainAngus (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

CaptainAngus (talk) 01:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Final free-QPQ nom from nominator. Article of sufficient length and newness. Hook interesting and cited in source (well, quoted inline). Earwig detects no copyvio aside from again direct quotes. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evgeniia Subbotina[edit]

(
)
  • Source: Shilov, A. A.; Karnaukhova, M. G., eds. (1932). "Субботина, Евгения Дмитриевна" [Subbotina, Evgeniia Dmitrievna]. Деятели революционного движения в России [ru] (in Russian). Vol. 4. Moscow: Society of Former Political Prisoners and Exiled Settlers. p. 1635–1636. OCLC 749336544. С помощью А. Лу. кашевича пыталась 28 янв. 1879 г. бежать; добралась до Иркутска, где была задержана 29 янв. т. г. Признанная ген.-губернаторок виновной в самовольн. отлучке, подвергнута 7-дневн. аресту при Иркутск. тюремн. Зам. к. азатем выслана в Верхоленск (Иркутск. губ.) с ением за ней особ. [...] В 1881 г. переведена в Иркутск, где жила с В. Александровой-Натансон, Принимала вместе с нею участие в денежной помощи и в организации побегов Е. Брешко-Брешковской из Баргузина и Е. Ковальской и С. Богомолец из Иркутск. [With the help of A. L. Kashevich she tried to escape on 28 January 1879; she reached Irkutsk, where she was detained on 29 January of that year. Found guilty of AWOL by the Governor-General, she was subjected to a 7-day arrest at the Irkutsk prison. She was deported to Verkholensk (Irkutsk province) and then deported with a special charge. [...] In 1881, she was transferred to Irkutsk, where she lived with V. Alexandrova-Natanson; she took part with her in providing monetary aid and in organising the escape of E. Breshko-Breshkovskaya from Barguzin and E. Kovalskaya and S. Bogomolets from Irkutsk.]
Created by Grnrchst (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 35 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Grnrchst (talk) 14:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Thanks for creating this. I've read some interesting first person accounts that mention the women Russian exiles. Please tag me once the missing citation is added. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Mary Mark Ockerbloom: I'm confused as to why this claim needs a citation? She collaborated on Lavrov's Vpered, was involved in a Narodnik organisation, was tried in two mass trials of Narodnik revolutionaries and actively organised with other Narodniks for decades. Is it not exceedingly obvious that this was the movement she was involved in? --Grnrchst (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Grnrchst: Yes, but all of that relies on the reader having knowledge of what that movement was and who it involved. For a Wikipedia reader who follows the hook to a topic that they aren't knowledgeable about, none of that is obvious. So I would suggest adding a sentence or phrase later in the body that in which you explicitly use the term Narodnik, with a citation to something that clarifies or at least uses that term. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 12:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bill McNulty[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 531 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

– Muboshgu (talk) 03:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Yup this one is definitely good to go. Was expanded the required amount within the allotted time frame. Long enough, well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant and copy-vio free. Earwig pops up low violation %. Article is presentable, sourced well, and QPQ is done. Hook is interesting as well. Def good to go :) Soulbust (talk) 01:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Detroit Lions Pro Bowl selections[edit]

(
)
Created by Hey man im josh (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • As a lifelong Lions fan due to watching Barry play in my formative years, I'm happy to review this. The article is new enough, long enough, and well sourced. Tone is neutral, Earwig is clean, and a spot check showed no issues. QPQ not needed. The hook is interesting and well-sourced, but unless I'm missing it, it doesn't appear in the actual article. The prose mentions he shares the team record for selections, and an image caption mentions he was chosen every season he played, but there's nothing about being the first NFL player to play at least ten seasons and be selected each year. @Hey man im josh: if you'll just include the fact in the article's prose and cite the SI article this should be good to go. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well that's embarrassing. I guess I had so many revisions and write ups I somehow accidently left it out altogether!! I've made sure it's now included in the prose. Thanks @DrOrinScrivello. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No worries, happens to the best of us! This is now ready for the Main Page. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 13:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Charge to Keep I Have[edit]

(
)
  • Source: "The title of the book is based upon a hymn written by Charles Wesley, 'A Charge to Keep I Have'" - George W. Bush, A Charge to Keep, page x.
  • Reviewed:
Created by Mystery Merrivale (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Mystery Merrivale (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is good, well-sourced, new enough, long enough and free of copyright. I do find the hook to be quite interesting + it is cited. QPQ not required. Template:LunaEatsTunaSig (talk), posted at 21:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Poitras[edit]

(
)
Created by B3251 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

B3251 (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Not ready yet, nominator needs a QPQ. Also, how is the Aquinian reliable? 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Aquinian is the St. Thomas University (STU)'s student newspaper. Per WP:RSSM as well as general consensus through discussions cited by WP:RSSM, using student media sparingly is generally fine; sometimes it is the only option for certain details/facts, such as in this instance for a general assumption of the subject's age, his connection to the University, and a small detail in the creation process of his book.
I apologize if you find that The Aquinian seems disputed, but because WP:N and WP:GNG has already been established it should be alright using student media for small bits of the article, as this is an instance where better sources couldn't be found. (this only applies to articles whose subject is connected to the University of said student press, of course, in which this case Poitras is). If it helps, STU has a more "official" magazine where Poitras has a small mention here as a journalism professor, and is mentioned here in a third-party provincial newspaper interview with a STU journalism student.
I hope this addresses any concerns! QPQ will be finished soon. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair rationale. Waiting for the QPQ. Ping me when you're done. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LunaEclipse: QPQ added, thank you. B3251 (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Approved. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 12:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of New England Revolution managers[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Brindille1 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Brindille1 (talk) 03:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC). This was not expanded five-fold in the past week (since 24 April), but great work on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me Da Wikipedian (talk • contribs) [reply]

WP:DYKcheck says this was 866 characters as recently as 26 April and is 6476 now. Full review needed.--Launchballer 15:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Full review:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article was nominated within a week of being expanded fivefold. Article coverage is neutral with the prose being consistently backed by reliable, high-quality sources formatted with inline citations. Earwig shows no copyright violations; top result only borrows spoken quotes. Though it's rather embarrassing to see as a Revs fan, ALT0 is unfortunately the most interesting hook out of the bunch, with ALT2 being second-best. All hooks are sourced and mentioned in the prose. No QPQ requirement necessary for this user. Here's to hoping the Revs can at least get the #1 draft pick next year... in the meantime, this nom is good to go! Aria1561 (talk) 23:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Swain[edit]

(
)
Swain in blackface
Swain in blackface
Created by 4meter4 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 76 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

4meter4 (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New, substantial, well-written, no plagiarism detected, image correctly licensed (I tweaked the tag to cover 100+ period of public domain); QPQ done. Hook verified AGF. Dahn (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shiva (British band)[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 226 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 10:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • 5x expansion has been done, sources check out, QPQ completed too. Only minor gripe is that the hook is rather vague but everything looks okay otherwise. Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 13:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Storie[edit]

(
)
  • ... that Elizabeth Storie's doctor poured nitric acid into her mouth, causing her teeth to fall out?
  • Source: Elizabeth Storie, The Autobiography of Elizabeth Storie, A Native of Glasgow, Who Was Subjected to Much Injustice at the Hands of Some Members of the Medical, Legal, and Clerical Professions (Glasgow: Richard Stobbs, 1859)
  • ALT1: ... that calomel was a popular medicine that caused mercury poisoning? Source: Haller, John S. “Samson of the Materia Medica: Medical Theory and the Use and Abuse of Calomel: In Nineteenth Century America.” Pharmacy in History, vol. 13, no. 2, 1971, pp. 67–76. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41108706. Accessed 1 May 2024.
  • ALT2: ... that a disabled Scottish seamstress published her autobiography in 1859? Source: Elizabeth Storie, The Autobiography of Elizabeth Storie, A Native of Glasgow, Who Was Subjected to Much Injustice at the Hands of Some Members of the Medical, Legal, and Clerical Professions (Glasgow: Richard Stobbs, 1859)
  • ALT3: ... that a 19th century autobiography by a disabled, working-class Scotswoman combines horror and tales of her spiritual awakening with court documents to convince her readers? Source: Graham Lai, Dana; Nelson, Holly Faith (2024). ""There Was Death in the Powder and He Knew It": Dis/ability and Tactics of Resistance in the Autobiography of Elizabeth Storie". Études écossaises (23). doi:10.4000/etudesecossaises.4925. ISSN 1240-1439.
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: I'm completely new to DYK so I'm not sure that these hooks are the best, but I think the topic of the article is interesting - it's about Elizabeth Stories, one of the first disabled women and working class women to publish her autobiography in the UK. The story of how she was disfigured by a doctor dosing her with calomel (mercury) and nitric acid is horrific.
5x expanded by Lijil (talk) and Discott (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Lijil (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Striking ALT1, as it does not contain the expanded article nor any reasonable place to put it. Full review needed.--Launchballer 07:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: LGTM, preference for ALT0 sohom@enwiki 14:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hevearita Gunaryanti Rahayu[edit]

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 221 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 04:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • I'll take this nomination. This is my first DYK review by the way. 750h+ 04:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The page was created by nominator within seven days of nomination. QPQ done. Hook is verified and article adheres to all criteria. Earwig finds no problems. Nom is good to go. 750h+ 04:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto Pölzl[edit]

(
)
  • Source: Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur, Vol. 40-41. Stiasny Verlag, 1996. p. 157
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 381 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Soman (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, long enough, Earwig notes no notable copyvio. Hook is interesting but on an offline source (Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur, Vol. 40-41) so I am assuming good faith. QPQ is completed. Everything seems to check out! Ornithoptera (talk) 05:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lyle Bauer[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 259 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Bloom6132 (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Great work on expanding the article! Just the height issue to address and then I'd be happy to pass this. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 05:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Suntooooth: thanks for the review! The source for his height in the infobox is ref 3 (StatsCrew.com) at the very bottom of the box – not that easy to see given the grey background (which I can't change because it's the default). —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologia Pro Vita Sua[edit]

(
)
  • Source: "He worked hour after hour, up to sixteen hours in one day - once for twenty-two hours running, on May 20th, with Rivington's man at the door next morning." p. 334, first full paragraph
  • ALT1: ... that after John Henry Newman wrote his Apologia Pro Vita Sua in response to an attack by Charles Kingsley, Kingsley compared Newman to a "treacherous ape" and implied that he was insane? Source: "If I am to bandy words, it must be with sane persons." and "I cannot be weak enough to put myself a second time ... into the power of one who like a treacherous ape, lifts to you meek and suppliant eyes ... " p. 343, first two full paragraphs
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: 2nd nom, so no QPQ needed
5x expanded by Smdjcl (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Smdjcl (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Approved: A very nice article, expanded within the window. Both hooks are good and check out. QPQ not required. I like ALT1 better: would suggest amending ALT0 to something like "the manuscript ready for the printer to collect..." in both hook and article, as the "at Newman's door" is a little confusing and not really idiomatic for someone coming to visit him - you could even cut it in the hook, as the interesting thing is the 22-hour day, not where he handed the manuscript over. Would also suggest reworking, in the article, Newman had been accused of secretly working to convert people to Catholicism while outwardly professing to be Anglican, and this belief persisted even after his conversion to Catholicism in 1845, as he would hardly be accused of outwardly professing Anglicanism after he had publicly converted to Catholicism. Still, none of these points should be an obstacle at this stage. Good work. UndercoverClassicist T·C 05:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@UndercoverClassicist: Thank you for your review and the kind words, and sorry for disappearing for a couple of days! Those two sentences that you pointed out were definitely the ones I had the most difficulty phrasing (my original draft of that second sentence you mentioned implied that he was still Anglican when he wrote the Apologia!). I've rephrased the sentences in the article, hopefully for the better. As for the hooks, I have no preference, so if you prefer alt1, I'm fine just going with that rather than trying to improve alt0. (Also, looking at the source again, it's not clear if it should be "manuscript" or "proof" - I just had "pamphlet" in the article. Probably better just to avoid that altogether in the hook.) Smdjcl (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don Johnson (basketball)[edit]

(
)
  • Source: All-American at UCLA (Los Angeles Times) "Eaton and Swen Nater are Johnson’s legacy--two raw seven-footers, with little or no basketball credentials before Cypress, who spent two years with Johnson and went on to lucrative careers in the NBA." (Los Angeles Times) "But when the massive Eaton enters the game, UCLA will shift to a low-post offense and the Bruin fast break will slow to a snail's pace. Eaton is a 23-year-old former master auto mechanic who learned his basketball at Cypress (Calif.) Community College from the same coach—former UCLA backcourt star Don Johnson—who sent the Bruins Swen Nater." (Sports Illustrated) "Not only did both Nater and Eaton play in the NBA, each still holds league records." (Cypress College)
Created by Bagumba (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 106 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

—Bagumba (talk) 10:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article that was created on 1 May 2024‎‎ is 4,704 characters and nominated two days later. No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 193 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Refs 11, 20, 21, and 22 (verifying the hook) are reliable sources. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saparinah Sadli[edit]

(
)
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 657 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article that was moved to mainspace on 2 May 2024‎‎ is 5,109 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Main hook is 108 characters long (ALT1 is 160); both are under 200 character max. and are interesting. Refs 2 (verifying ALT1) and 5 (verifying the main hook) are reliable sources from The Jakarta Post. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lineage (anthropology)[edit]

(
)
5x expanded by Me Da Wikipedian (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

In the article, and sign your posts.--Launchballer 16:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Needed to anyway for some minor stuff, how is it now? @Launchballer: Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still needs another 42 characters. You should consider installing WP:DYKcheck so you can check yourself.--Launchballer 17:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now added some stuff about the 2 types of ambilineal, which I may expand into there own sectrions at some point. Hows this now @Launchballer: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me Da Wikipedian (talk • contribs)
How are you remembering to put my username in your comments and not- anyway, length requirement met. Full review needed.--Launchballer 20:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do said review, and if not who and when will do it @Launchballer:Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It won't be me any time soon, I have a policy of doing my QPQs oldest first. Any other editor is free to review this in the interim.--Launchballer 07:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Nominated in time. 5x expansion. No QPQ need. Current hook as written is not reflected in the text of the article. Another hook please. --evrik (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nom is blocked and based on behavior likely a sock (but I haven't figured out who yet). Not to mention multiple issues with submission noted above. We have enough work to do, we don't need to be wasting time on this. RoySmith (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can however respond, here, and I will. It was in the article when it was submitted. Anyways, here is a new one:Did you know that lineages often have religious significance, determining ones religion and there role in that religion
https://collegeofarms.euclid.int/tracing-roots-the-significance-of-family-trees-in-traditional-societies/
. Also, I do not appreciate unfounded allegations by @RoySmith: that I am wasting their time and a sock. Thank you. @Evrik @Me Da Wikipedian: (talk) 20:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

I am posting the above from this this post. The user has suggested:

  • Alt2 ... that lineages often have religious significance, determining ones religion and their role in that religion?
I am AGF that this user will be welcomed back to the fold. --evrik (talk) 21:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lock's Quest[edit]

(
)

* ... that Lock's Quest featured "some of the best original music in a DS game"?

Improved to Good Article status by GraziePrego (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GraziePrego (talk) 08:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review: (1) article is new enough - nominated 3 days following promotion to GA; (2) article is long enough; (2) promoted to GA so assumed policy compliant; (3) copvio looks OK, with most similar text identified as being in quotes, so no issues; (4) Article is presentable; (5) hooks are both cited to independent source (both with a stated editorial policy), and are cited in the article; (6) Not my area, but both hooks are of interest. I have struck the first hook to create ALT0a below - this is just a minor change to clarify "it was said" rather than "it was". I'll leave it to the Promoter to choose the preferred hook. (7) no image; (8) no QPQ needed; and (9) no other issues detected. Good stuff GraziePrego! ResonantDistortion 22:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT0a: ... that Lock's Quest was said to feature "some of the best original music in a DS game"?
    Minor update: I added a wikilink to "DS" in ALT0a in case the reader is not familiar with the term. ResonantDistortion 08:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central Synagogue (Manhattan)[edit]

(
)
Central Synagogue
Central Synagogue
  • ... that the roof of New York City's Central Synagogue was rebuilt using surveillance photographs? Source: Barista, Dave (December 2001). "Tradition restored". Building Design & Construction. Vol. 42, no. 12. p. 24.
    • ALT1: ... that New York City's Central Synagogue is topped by onions? Source: Prial, Dunstan (September 16, 2001). "Central Synagogue in New York City reopened". Jerusalem Post. Associated Press. p. 7.
    • ALT2: ... that New York City's Central Synagogue is topped by onion-shaped domes? Source: Prial, Dunstan (September 16, 2001). "Central Synagogue in New York City reopened". Jerusalem Post. Associated Press. p. 7.
    • ALT3: ... that New York City's Central Synagogue has hosted churches and a mosque? Source: Multiple in article
    • ALT4: ... that the design of New York City's Central Synagogue was intended to allude to the history of Jews in Muslim countries? Source: Sachs, Susan (August 29, 1998). "A Living History of American Judaism". The New York Times.
    • ALT5: ... that Central Synagogue has been continuously used by a congregation for longer than any other synagogue in New York City? Source: Jackson, Kenneth T., ed. (2010). The Encyclopedia of New York City (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 226.
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tad's Steaks
    • Comment: More hook suggestions would be appreciated.
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 652 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Epicgenius (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Substantial interesting article, on its way to FA I assume, on plenty of sources, offline sources accepted AGF. The image is licensed and says better what ALTs 1 and 2 say. The original hook is nothing specific to this treasure. My favourite is ALT3. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know/Approved/week-2&oldid=1171759124"