Jump to content

User talk:173.9.202.113

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Robert E. Lee constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Frankenpuppy (talk) 15:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William Gregg, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ale_Jrbtalk 18:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to William Gregg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Robert E. Lee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 17:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rafael Nadal has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 16:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Buoyancy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --RexxS (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rhombic triacontahedron has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kbdank71 14:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Rahul constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 14:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Fog Point Light has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Bolton by-election, 1916 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lufia: The Ruins of Lore. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Lufia: The Ruins of Lore. Epbr123 (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 14:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism, discovered Jan 28.DOR (HK) (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

[edit]

Your edits to May 26

[edit]

Dear 173.9.202.113,
Some of your edits on the page May 26 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 17:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ester has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to March 26

[edit]

Dear 173.9.202.113,
Some of your edits on the page March 26 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

No Wikipedia page has been linked to.

If a Wikipedia page for the person already exists, add a link to it (by putting it in doubled square brackets [[Like this]]) and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 19:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page March 26. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -- Tyler D Mace (talk · contr) 19:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at March 26, you will be blocked from editing. Mr. moose (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

April 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Allan Pinkerton worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Jojhutton (talk) 15:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Allan Pinkerton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 00:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Andrew Pitman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 15:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Oslo Accords has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jusdafax 14:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chief Pontiac. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Burner0718 JibbaJabba! 16:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chief Pontiac. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Until It Sleeps Talk • Contribs 16:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page John Philip Sousa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Vladimir Lenin. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. RolandR 16:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Lenin's Mausoleum worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. ♃ Dr. Yuriev 20:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Vladimir Lenin, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ♃ Dr. Yuriev 20:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fort Dearborn. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 21:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to H. H. Holmes, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Kermit Beahan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Staxringold talkcontribs 20:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.9.202.113 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are in violation of 17 USC 2402 which prohibits discrimination for unsure editions of open sourced material. If you can demonstrate this was fully and purposefully intended to be vandalism then you may continue. However, the changes made were to be constructive contributions as requested, so we believe the ban is unnecessary and are willing to contact our legal staff 173.9.202.113 (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Three things apply here. 1: Such edits are unambiguously vandalism beyond any reasonable standard. 2: You in violation of our no legal threats policy, which means you have no right to edit here while your legal threat is outstanding. 3: Wikipedia is hosted by a private entity, the Wikimedia Foundation. You may be interested to read Wikipedia:Free speech. NW (Talk) 21:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

post-block

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hong Kong, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Flyguy649 talk 22:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Timeline of Chinese history. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Flyguy649 talk 22:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Hong Kong. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --RrburkeekrubrR 22:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Timeline of the Mongol Empire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy (msg) 15:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hadrian, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hadrian was changed by 173.9.202.113 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-05-24T16:47:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:47, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Spartacus. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 19:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to 1800–1809, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely-used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Begoon (talk) 14:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Hummer H1 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mongol military tactics and organization has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ” TeLeS (T @ L C S) 21:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Octahedron, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ” TeLeS (T @ L C S) 21:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mongol military tactics and organization. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ” TeLeS (T @ L C S) 21:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to G, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

October 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dušan Slobodník. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Moogwrench (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chicxulub crater, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chicxulub crater. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 19:43, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Race riot. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Race riot with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Monty845 16:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Race riot. Morning277 (talk) 19:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Chicago Race Riot of 1919, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Perch, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tolly4bolly 18:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Perch with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tolly4bolly 18:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to John James Audubon, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan  15:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John James Audubon with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yintan  15:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Our Lady of the Angels School fire has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Our Lady of the Angels School fire. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dawn Bard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Elbert Shelley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dawn Bard (talk) 16:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water1744 by John Finscher, but it later (building)|church]] in the county was built in 1755. [[Native Americans in the United States|Native American]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Astrodome has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Astrodome with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Astrodome with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pure Land Buddhism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pure Land Buddhism with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ⁓ Hello71 17:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 19:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zerbu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cothon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Zerbu 💬 15:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:173.9.202.113&oldid=1145728569"