Jump to content

User talk:216.23.8.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



October 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paper recycling, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abbasid Caliphate with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nepenthes (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abbasid Caliphate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Web 2.0, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Web 2.0 was changed by 216.23.8.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952872 on 2011-10-25T18:30:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ganesha, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ganesha was changed by 216.23.8.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906657 on 2011-10-25T19:18:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Theda 19:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Luo Qingquan with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 17:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Paul E. Harney has been reverted.
Your edit here to Paul E. Harney was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://stljunque.wordpress.com, http://stljunque.wordpress.com, http://stljunque.wordpress.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:38, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Webb City High School (Missouri) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Webb City High School (Missouri) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
I did this because http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We generally try to avoid linking to external audio or video.

We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.

Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Tom Morris. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Triangle with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Tom Morris (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dice, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Ocaasi t | c 17:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Articles of Confederation, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vermin Supreme, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Elaine Anderson Steinbeck, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Triangle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

March 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Italian unification, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Cusworth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jim Proctor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jim Proctor was changed by 216.23.8.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-04-06T12:50:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Southworth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Orphan Wiki (talk) 19:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Roman economy was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 17:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Cycling, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Qwfp (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dysentery. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. John of Reading (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Duty with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ducknish (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Duty with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ducknish (talk) 13:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Duty with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 14:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Electriccatfish2. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Nishant (or) Nishanth because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Electric Catfish (talk) 18:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm SassyLilNugget. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Traditional Chinese holidays that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SassyLilNugget (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Circulatory system. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. - MrX 18:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm GoShow. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chemical energy because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. GoShow (............................) 21:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to East St. Louis, Illinois with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Weedwhacker128 (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taraxacum, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deli nk (talk) 14:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm James086. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Thermal insulation that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James086Talk 19:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Thermal insulation with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. James086Talk 19:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Thermal insulation with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. James086Talk 19:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Jonathanfu. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Canadian Football League, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jonathanfu (talk) 16:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lambeau Field. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Fraggle81 (talk) 18:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaylen Bledsoe (2), you may be blocked from editing. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at African bush elephant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. T H F S W (T · C · E) 21:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to John Tavares (ice hockey), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yinta 13:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Indian Rebellion of 1857, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, —MelbourneStartalk 13:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Becknell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Silvrous Talk 15:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Orgetorix, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃   18:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Orgetorix, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃   16:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Circulatory system

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Circulatory system with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 18:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ceres (dwarf planet), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Design elements and principles because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elements of art has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Design elements and principles, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]