User talk:85.115.54.202

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Please can this IP be unblocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.115.54.202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The IP address which I am writing from has been flagged for vandalism but this has not happened through our activities. I use it for the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors - please can it be unlocked so that I can proceed with suggested changes to our page?85.115.54.202 (talk) 11:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Open proxies will not be unblocked, but see below. Huon (talk) 10:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The IP address is blocked not because of vandalism, but because it is a proxy, which potentially could be used to evade Wikipedia policies by hiding the true source of edits. Is there any reason why you need to edit via this proxy, rather than directly? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is (one of those) used by Ealing Main Library (and possibly other LB Ealing libraries); LB Hillingdon libraries also share a different IP, and is also blocked as a proxy (ie both systems have 100+ computers on a number of different sites). Is this the 'non-technical explanation'?

Both setups do not allow account creation - perhaps there could be 'some rigmarole' involving emailing for a user name, a temporary password and a CAPTCHA rigmarole to enable new users to register.

'Not the above user of the IP' (and 'knowing only sufficient technicalities to ask the above question). 85.115.54.202 (talk) 16:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is such a "rigmarole"; see Wikipedia:Request an account. Huon (talk) 10:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'#This user# of the LBE IP does so occasionally (and is harmless but not involved with engineering topics). 85.115.54.202 (talk) 17:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I or someone else undid one or more of your recent contributions to Max Woosnam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Duncan Watmore has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Egghead06 (talk) 14:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Williamson (footballer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 14:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Note - this IP is used by several persons rather than being a split personality. 85.115.54.202 (talk) 16:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eton College, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 12:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Eton College. Denisarona (talk) 12:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm CatcherStorm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wanderers F.C., but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CatcherStorm ^talk 01:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at HM Revenue and Customs with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 12:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Accessibility. BRP^ever 10:35, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Walkers Shortbread has been reverted.
Your edit here to Walkers Shortbread was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/WalkersShortbread) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Joe Hancock— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 11:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JumpiMaus (talk) 11:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of people from Stoke-on-Trent— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of people from Stoke-on-Trent with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 10:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Patrick Curran with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Sinatra. Dcirovic (talk) 13:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SMALL JIM 13:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Economy of Djibouti has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 12:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

The edits by the IP will seem an odd mix - and creative/non-constructive because it has 'multiple personality IP-syndrome' (What was the IP that was arguing with itself that time?) 85.115.54.202 (talk) 17:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Cologne. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 10:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Llanrumney

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Llanrumney article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Optometry. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Optometry. Favonian (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Richhill A.F.C.— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 09:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pub. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Felixstowe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Edward Thomas (poet) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016

Hello, I'm Justeditingtoday. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justeditingtoday (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Victor Wanyama. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 15:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Victor Wanyama, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm NgYShung. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jimmy Eat World— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NgYShung ^huh? 11:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Tiki Taane

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tiki Taane, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Charlie Heaton

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Charlie Heaton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to ETSV Weiche— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Non-Dropframe _talk 16:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Anglian Home Improvements, you may be blocked from editing. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 13:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm NsTaGaTr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Madagascar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NsTaGaTr ^(Talk) 17:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017

Hello, I'm Iggy the Swan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fernando Llorente, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iggy (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Prom. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 11:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pixie— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Spanish cuisine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 10:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to James Avery (actor). Aurora (talk | contribs) 12:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Granita. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RHcosm (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ethanol, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

85.115.54.202 (talk) 08:46, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Hello, I am a Communications Manager and I am trying to edit a Wikipedia page for St Ann’s Hospital https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Ann%27s_Hospital but I am unable to do as the IP address I’m using is blocked.[reply]

Could you please assist?

I need to remove the last sentence in the services section: As of 2017 there are plans to sell at least part of the site for housing in order to pay for improvements to the Trust's estate.[5]

This need to be replaced with the new copy below:

The Trust received full Planning approval in 2018 from Haringey Council for the new mental health inpatient building, to replace the current three adult mental health wards and the specialist eating disorders ward. This follows a lot of work with patients, carers and staff and the Trust’s design and build partner, Integrated Health Projects.

Construction of the new mental health building has begun with completion due by late summer 2020. This is very exciting news for the Trust, its patients and staff. It means that the current wards at St Ann’s Hospital will be replaced by brand new, state-of-the-art facilities, which will be amongst the best in the country.

The proposed residential development on the part of the site surplus to NHS needs is also progressing following the sale of the surplus land to the Greater London Authority (GLA). The GLA will develop the surplus land for housing, with at least 50% of the new homes being designated as affordable housing. 22 of the flats to be built will be available to the Trust to use to help recruit clinical staff.

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Edits cannot be made by proxy if there is a block. You will need to request the creation of an account for you at WP:ACC, or create one in a different physical location. Once you have an account, you must review and comply with the conflict of interest and paid editing policies; you can then make a formal edit request on the article talk page of the hospital. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just an additional note. A change like the one you are proposing would need to be cited to a proper source; the change can't just be made on your own authority. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please can this disgraceful commentary be removed in brackets

South Oxhey is a suburb of Watford in the Watford Rural parish of the Three Rivers district of Hertfordshire, England. It is located in the south western corner of Northwood (mostly tramps hang around this area and are from here girls who look like tangerines and are annoying come out of this area with at least 3 babies by 18 as they’re all slags with a serious attitude problem) Hertfordshire and close to the boundary with Greater London. At the 2011 Census South Oxhey's population was included in the Northwick Ward of Three Rivers Council

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.