Jump to content

User talk:Cedrus-Libani/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All those stub images

[edit]

All those pictures that you're uploading & replacing in the stub messages--we can't use them without knowing the source (where they came from/artist/etc.) and whether we have permission to use them and a specific license agreement such as {{GFDL}}. Could you please go back into those images & provide that info? If they're from clipart or other such source, we need to get permission to use them. Thanks. Elf | Talk 22:33, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

May I ask what was wrong with the sw-stub? Why was the pic of Yoda replaced with the Vader helmet. Your version looks like crap (no offense), and at least we know that the Yoda pic is a screenshot from the movies. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:10, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, Riffsyphon1024 is right, there is no reason to change all of these to free content clipart (which to me look like old school Windows 95 computer icons). Most of the stub templates you changed to these cliparts, already had an image that had fair usage, such as the Star Wars stub (sw-stub), the Yoada was a screenshot from one of the SW movies, and in Wikipedia that is fair useage. AlexTheMartian 01:24, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
I'm having troubling figuring out the legal status of freegaia.com images. I can't find a clear copyright notice. (There is a site copyright notice which seems to require permission to redistribute or display their content, but that seems to be at odds with the large number of images they offer.) For use on Wikipedia, we need to be a bit more clear than that. Is there a clear copyright statement somewhere?
I am also concerned that some of the images I have found on their site are not public domain images. For example, this images are ezboard.com images and to the best of my knowledge they are not public domain. I don't think that Star Wars images can be public domain, either (since they are derivatives of a copyrighted work).
It might also be wise to put a bit more care into changing images that were custom-created. (For one thing, images that were custom-created by Wikipedians have clear, known copyright status. For another, they may have been chosen for a reason.) For example, Template:Sf-stub really shouldn't have a Star Wars image on it. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:16, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Going by the one copyright statement that's there, I think that wikipedia shouldn't be using any of these images. After all, alternatives can usually be sourced fairly easily. 19:39, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC).


I have no problem: if you think that these images shouldn't be in Wikipedia (That's the concept of this site: to correct the mistakes of others). It's just that I was bored and I started changing pictures to a more beautiful and significant ones. I was asked by User:Grutness to change some pictures and I did it. So if you want, change it or remove it. 500LL 11:29, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Beautiful? -- Riffsyphon1024 00:20, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Aren't They? 500LL 12:24, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Look at them, man. Do they really look that good? -- Riffsyphon1024 19:28, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Free images

[edit]

I'm Sorry, I haven't mentionned theirs source. They all come from the free content (french) site FreeGaia [[1]
And I added the source of all the icons that I upploaded so far:
File:Composer-stub.jpg; File:X-wing-stub.jpg; File:Beagle-stub.jpg; File:Money-stub.jpg; File:Darth Vader-stub.jpg; File:Train56 stub.jpg; File:BMW-stub.jpg; File:Shuttle-stub.jpg; File:Plane6-stub.jpg; File:Boat-stub.jpg.
500LL 22:46, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Geo-stub images

[edit]

Hi 500LL, I must admit I'm not 100% happy with some of the new images you've added to the various geo-stubs. Several of the ones that were there were deliberately used so as not to include a flag, simply because with the size they are the predominance of white makes the maps hard to recognise (even with the shadow effect). This is particularly noticeable with Italy, Japan, and Mexico. The icons become far too busy, too, which is why a single colour associated with the country (blue for Italy's Azzuri and Green for Mexico) was used instead. Before you change too many more note that several of them are deliberately not maps for a reason (either disputed territory, for instance with India and Israel, or because the map is not an instantly identifiable shape, as with Spain and Germany).

Also, you replaced a map of the United Kingdom with a map of Great Britain on the UK-geo-stub - clearly a mistake - and that one has been reverted! Grutness|hello? 02:19, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for changing those three back - one thing I didn't say before is that several of the new pictures are a distinct improvement. It took me ages to find a rocketry picture that was half-way right. The clipart shuttle is a vast improvement! (PS - when you write on someone's talk page, it's helpful if you sign your name! :) Grutness|hello? 09:52, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

You put a {{vfd}} tag on List of cities in Lebanon, but you didn't make any explanations why. Please finish the VfD process (Go here for help), or remove the vfd tag. Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-13 15:53 Z


French Maid Merger

[edit]

In merging two contradictory articles you gave priority to some misstatements of fact that I have reverted.If you go to a costume shop looking for FM outfits they are unlikely to direct you to lingerie or nightgowns,which are a minority of available FM-themed outfits.A provocative dress not intended to be worn to sleep is the more usual form.But thanks for doing a merger that needed it...any chance you can do the other two pairs I inquired about on Village pump/assistance,namely Ageplay/Age play and William A. Bootle/William Augustus Bootle?--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 03:52, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Stub Images

[edit]

Greetings. I put up a good effort to try to save the stub images you uploaded, but it looks like I'm going to have to delete them. (I listed them on Wikipedia:Image sleuthing, but they determined the images aren't okay to use.) It's too bad. I know you put some work into uploading them. Anyway, if I can help you with anything, just let me know. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 14:34, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your interest and contributions, but can I ask you to be slightly cautious in changing the old details - Rail transport in India was COTW from May 20 to May 27 2004, but susequently moved (by cut and paste, it would seem) to Indian Railways. All of the edit history appears at Rail transport in India, not Indian Railways. -- ALoan (Talk) 22:12, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yusuf al-Khal

[edit]

Could you please see my questions at Talk:Yusuf al-Khal. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:23, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

FINUL / UNIFIL

[edit]

Just to let you know that the English wikipedia does have an article on UNIFIL. I would think that you can remove it from the 'list of French articles that have no English equivalent' -- Firehead | Talk 09:16, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for checking on my user page. 500LL 14:26, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Syrian presence in Lebanon

[edit]

Since you represent the Lebanese point of view, would you consider moving the article Syrian occupation of Lebanon to Syrian presence in Lebanon? Both governments never recognized an "occupation", and most Lebanese Shi'a didn't either. That article's title comes off from a very Right-Wing Maronite point of view. I feel, however, that if I moved it someone like DavidCannon would move it back. That is why I'd like your input on this idea, shukran.Yuber(talk) 20:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will be frank with you. As a lebanese I see the Syrian presence as an occupation. Also it's not only from a "Right-Wing Maronite point of view" as the USA and the european countries recognised it. But if it's really very offensive to the syrian community, I suggest moving it to "Syrian presence in Lebanon", and redirect it. 500LL 07:43, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
Well first of all, it's not offensive to the Syrian community because most Syrians and Lebanese understand that it was the dictatorial Ba'athist government that went into Lebanon (after being invited by the Christians). But, if it's an occupation, then you are comparing it to the Israeli occupation of Palestine. If you've been to Lebanon under "occupation", then you'd know that there are no curfews and the country rebounded well during the past 10 years. Anyways, I will leave it up to you to move it to Syrian presence in Lebanon, as there are some pro-Israeli editors stalking me and reverting everything I do.Yuber(talk) 15:15, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will move "Syrian occupation of Lebanon" to "Syrian presence in Lebanon" and redirect. Another thing, could you help and vote for the deletion of Lebanon under Syrian protection. There's some users (who apparently doesn't know anything about this subject) voted for keeping without knowing how offensive this title is for the lebanese.500LL 17:57, May 30, 2005 (UTC)

Cedar Revolution OR Intifada of Independence

[edit]

I can’t find any references online for the term “Intifada of Independence” and I noticed the previous non-wiki-member reversed it back to his edit to read “Intifada of Independence”. I have been out of Lebanon for over a decade and was wondering if you can confirm which term is correct. Do you think that’s just the why North American Media refers to it? Thank you --NEWUSER|CARPEDIEM (talk) 23:59, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)

Locally there's no official name for the Cedar revolution. Many are used by the lebanese media to describe this event. The main one is Independance uprising or Intifada of Independance (Intifadat al-Isteqlal). There's also Lebanon spring (Rabi' Lubnan), Lebanon Independance (Iste'lel Lubnan), Cedar uprising (Itifadat al-Arz), Independance 05. The only name that I disagree with is Cedar spring added by AlladinSE.500LL 09:15, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Abikand_flag.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Abikand_flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 19:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Zscout370 (Sound Off) 02:57, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CG can you comment on the Gucci revolution issue? Talk:Cedar Revolution? By the way, I am thinking of creating a Lebanese project/community similar to this one Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism, what do you think?--equitor 17:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some people are inserting a Zionist POV into this article. Please check the latest revisions and see what you think.Yuber(talk) 21:38, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You might want to check out Operation Litani as well.Yuber(talk) 13:54, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Now he changed Qana massacre to Qana incident. I've changed it back, but he will change it again. You really should take action on this.Yuber(talk) 19:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I'm really sorry, during this month I'll be busy, and I won't be able to revew the article that u suggested.500LL 19:37, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Diacritics

[edit]

Hi there! I'm just curious about one thing: why have you been removing the diacritics such as the acute mark from the spelling of names like Béchara el-Khoury? If the diacritic is part of the spelling of the name, it's supposed to be included. That's why the accented characters are included, for easy insertion, at the bottom of every edit box (scroll down to the bottom of this page to see what I mean). David Cannon 21:42, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, but I tried to use the official names used in the presidential official site see, and second if we should use diactrics only for the spelling, you could leave the title and include the pronunciation in the introduction.500LL 03:52, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
Okay, that sounds reasonable to me. Thanks for explaining. I'll do the same in any future aarticles I upload. David Cannon 05:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

MEast-geo-stub ->Leb-stub

[edit]

Hi - any reason why you've taken MEast-geo-stub off a couple of articles when adding leb-stub to them? They're still geo-stubs, so they need to keep a geo-type stub template, since many editors search using the specific geo templates. If you wish to add leb-stub, that's fine (although the general country-stubs are usually for non-geographic items), but please add it as a second template rather than replacing the one that's there! Thanks. Grutness...wha? 11:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi, there was recently a dispute because the article about the civilian deaths at Qana was called Qana Massacre, which someone objected to as POV. It was therefore moved to Qana Incident, which was also objected to, and a revert war ensued, leading to page protection. The article has now been called Qana as a compromise, and I'm trying to determine whether that's okay with the editors on the page, so that I can unlock it. Yuber suggested I should check with you as you're from Lebanon. If you'd like to comment, please see Talk:Qana. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 05:54, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Barnstar proposal

[edit]

Hey, 500LL. It's been over a month since you've proposed a Barnstar for Wikiprojects. Why don't you drop by and give your thoughts on the design of this Barnstar? Thanks, Sango123 July 3, 2005 20:23 (UTC)

Diacritics and redirects

[edit]

Hi there! I've read your explanation on diacritics and I'm satisfied with it. That part is okay.

One other thing, though: please don't do cut-and-paste page moves. That destroys the edit history. If you find you cannot move a page because there is already something where you want to move it (as in the Emile Lahoud article), ask an administrator (I'm one of them) to delete the destination page for you. Then you'll be able to move the article there.

Meanwhile, I'll repair the cut-and-paste job on Emile Lahoud. David Cannon 5 July 2005 23:25 (UTC)

Thank you. 500LL July 6, 2005 11:26 (UTC)

Hiya, I did this move for you - did you get an error when you tried to do it? I'm not an admin, so I can't think of a technical reason why you might not have been able to. Cheers, Talrias (t | e | c) 7 July 2005 21:04 (UTC)

Thank you. But I really don't remember what error message was written. 500LL July 8, 2005 13:32 (UTC)


You helped choose {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} as this week's WP:ACID winner

[edit]
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Spanish translation of the week

[edit]


African COTW

[edit]
You showed support for the African Collaboration of the Week. This week Dar es Salaam was chosen. Please help improve it to featured-article standard.

Tfd instructions

[edit]

Please complete the Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Instructions. I already corrected your omission of the parameter on {{tfd}} and separated the votes so the links all work. (SEWilco 16:41, 11 July 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Discussion on standardized Arabic naming is going on at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Arabic). – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 17:05, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Cite video

[edit]

I have updated the the talk page. Ping me if you have any issues with the formatting. pamri 11:49, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Please check the Lebanese Forces article

[edit]

Hi there,

I'm sorry to break into your busy schedule, but could you please have a look at the Lebanese Forces article. A new user named User:Usurp, who claims to run the official Lebanese Forces website, has tried to rewrite the article to promote the party's propaganda. I told him that we cannot have POV on Wikipedia. I agreed with a lot of the POV by the way, but it is not acceptable material for Wikipedia. He refused to accept that, and for the last 48 hours, he and I have been constantly reverting and counter-reverting each other. Now, I'd be the last to claim that my version is perfectly correct. But his version is POV which is not even subtle. As of this moment, the version that's "up" is mostly mine, but by the time you read this, it will probably be his again.

I think that you, being Lebanese, would have a more objective understanding that I have of the article, and I will defer to your judgement. I'm sending an identical message to User:Equitor. Please check the recent edit history of the article. Thank you! David Cannon 01:23, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you recently added {{FAOL|French|fr:Titan arum}} to Talk:Titan arum. Unfortunately, fr:Titan arum does not exist, and fr:Arum titan is not featured! Did something go wrong? -- ALoan (Talk) 23:15, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my error - I saw that it was essentially a French translation of our article and had a redlinked talk page and drew the wrong conclusion: I forgot that the French denote featured articles with their wikimedal on the article page. But that is a shockingly bad featured article. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:19, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Templates

[edit]

Although I was not the one who created Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates (originally it was User:Stevertigo), I did try to make it look more like an active WikiProject and not just an empty copy of the WikiProject creation boilerplate Template:WikiProject (there is a long and boring story of why I show in the article history as the project creator)). I did plan to eventually get back to the Template WP and do more work, but I am currently trying to turn the Southern California WikiProject into a viable WP. I will, however, try to help out in any way that I can.

You might want to take a look at the organization of the SoCal WikiProject, which has been drastically modified from the WP boilerplate into what I think is a more workable arraingement. Eventually I'll probably change the Template:WikiProject to match, but that's way down on my list of ToDo's.

The Template WikiProject has much to do. One of the biggest problems is that much like the rest of the Wikipedia, there is very little documentation, while at the same time there are plenty of undocumented "traditions" going on at TFD, etc. And then there is the problem of trying to keep on top of sometimes not-well-publicized "standardization" efforts (such as the new Wikipedia:Infobox standardisation). I was going to add that to the descendent projects, but for some reason you just deleted that section.

The efforts of the Template WP should probably start small while it builds up a critical number of participants (recruiting some of the more active participants at TFD and Wikipedia:Template standardisation). Once that happens I think that it should undertake a major search through the Template namespace (similar to the efforts of the Stub-sorting WikiProject) where all the unused templates will get nominated for deletion, all the useful but poorly documented templates will get documentation, and all the badly designed but potentially useful templates will get redesigned.

My guess, from a rather hapazardly going through of the Template namespace, is that 5-10% of the templates can be speedy deleted as user tests, plus another 10-20% are probably not used at all and will quickly pass a nomination at TFD. There probably should be some expansion of the criteria of speedy deletion of templates, but all the proposals so far have not passed consensus, mostly because each proposal still had problems with the chance of false positives. BlankVerse 18:20, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox standardization

[edit]

You opposed Wikipedia:No infobox standardization, but did not give a rationale for your vote. Can you add your motivations? This is important because you have set an important precedent. So far, policies have always been discussed for a reasonable time. It was never done via the VfD-process sofar because most users on VfD has disapproved of this procedure sofar and there is widespread consensus that policy proposals should be subject to discussion. --Fenice 19:34, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gaming Collaboration of the week

[edit]
Gaming Collaboration of the week
Gaming Collaboration of the week
You showed support for Gaming Collaboration of the week.
This week Wikipedia:Gaming Collaboration of the week/current was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Grumpy Troll (talk) 02:52, 22 August 2005 (UTC).[reply]

Removal of Interlingua

[edit]

What was the reason?

Interlingua

[edit]

Hi, I replaced the interlingua section on the multilingual page as no reason was given for its removal. If you know something I don't on why it doesn't belong there please make a note of it next time and also leave a note on my talk page. Thank you.

Mithridates 23:06, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about deleting the Interlangua link without any explanation. I wasn't sure if it was the Interlangua equivalent of the English FA, and since there wasn't an interlanguage link in WP:FA linking to this page. CG 09:05, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

A nice shiny barnstar!

[edit]
A barnstar for your voice - you asked just the right questions at just the right time, ultimately resulting in the grand Reference Desk changes. Thank you! --HappyCamper

Hi Cedar-Guardian! If it weren't for your questions, the changes to the reference desk would never have been made. You were instrumental in getting those changes started - by asking the just right questions at the just right time. Thank you for your observant diligence and revival of dialogue. In recognition of the impact of your small yet substantially significant actions, I wish to award you this barnstar - may it bring you good luck and all the best there is! I hope you treasure it and keep it forever bright! --HappyCamper 01:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your barnstar! :-) --HappyCamper 00:24, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

removing colors from conservation status templates

[edit]

I'm trying to look for the discussion that came up to the consensus that conservative templates (like {{StatusSecure}} should be decolorised. I saw that you decolorised at least one template. Why did you do that? I think that the colored ones are more beautiful. CG 21:07, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

The discussion you seek is here. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:20, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. CG 08:44, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

Belarus Infobox

[edit]

I Fixed it, though it took me a while. Does it look good now? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:01, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, how does it look now? Zach (Sound Off) 02:09, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation status of Tasmanian devil

[edit]

I didn't quite understood the reason for removing the conservation status of the Tasmanian devil, even if it's from an IUCN source. Could you clarify? CG 07:58, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

The problem with the ICUN status is that is an opinion of the ICUN that actually bears no relation to conservation status in Australia. Australia has its own laws and so on for ranking threatened speices, and so far the Devil is not listed as a threatened species here. I also think that the lower concern ranks aren't actually worth adding to a taxobox and only the more severe ranks (theatened, endandered etc.) should be included.--nixie 08:04, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't unserstand why the IUCN bears no relation to conservation status in Australia, please clarify. And what is the conservative status of this animal for an australian view? CG 09:39, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations!

[edit]

I'm pleased to inform you that you are now an administrator. Please consider reading all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. Though everything you do, excluding image deletions and page history merges, is reversible, you should nevertheless be very careful with your sysop capabilities. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Good luck! — Dan | Talk 23:21, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CG! Congrats on your adminship! :-) --HappyCamper 00:43, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations and good luck as an admin! Andre (talk) 21:38, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Popups tool

[edit]

Congratulations on being made an admin! I thought you might like to know of a javascript tool that may help in your editing by giving easy access to many admin features. It's described at Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation popups. The quick version of the installation procedure for admins is to paste the following into User:Cedrus-Libani/Archive 1/monobook.js:

// [[User:Lupin/popups.js]] - please include this line 

document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' 
             + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js' 
             + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');

popupShortcutKeys=true; // optional: enable keyboard shortcuts
popupAdminLinks=true;   // optional: enable admin links

There are more options which you can fiddle with listed at Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation popups. Give it a try and let me know if you find any glitches or have suggestions for improvements! Lupin|talk|popups 01:00, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

File:WikiThanks.jpg Thanks for the WikiThanks, and congratulations on being an adm. Molotov (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

[edit]

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian (t) (c) 05:57, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations, my distinct pleasure. I did reread Ambi's comments to you again, and it appears she (yes, Ambi's a she) had a valid point or two on the reorganization you'd done. Nevertheless, I gave you the benefit of the doubt due to the work you did on the Wikipedia Reference Desk. I do urge you to be cautious about large changes in the manner that Ambi mentioned, and to get feedback from the community first. This reduces aggravation from other users, and lets them know the direction you are trying to go. If I may be a sounding board to you on this or other matters, please do let me know. --avnative 13:26, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Usercategorization

[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Lebanon page as living in or being associated with Lebanon. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Lebanon for instructions. Rmky87 07:39, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

I hereby apologize for my remark on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalal Haddad. I posted an apology on that page. I am still fairly new at this (about 3 months) and still have a lot to learn. ♠ DanMS 00:16, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions

[edit]

Hi there! I haven't seen you in a while. Could you check the contributions of User talk:213.176.78.6? I think s/he might be adding some technical information about chemistry, which might be useful. --HappyCamper 05:15, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Religious Pluralism

[edit]

Hi Cedar Guardian,

thank you for supporting Religious Pluralism in WP:AID! If you want, take a look at Talk:Religious Pluralism page (especially the section about the new outline) and see if you can contribute something - one thing I could imagine would be interesting would be to bring in the case of the Lebanese multi-religious society into the section where we'll discuss the situation in different countries and times. Any help and expert knowledge would be most welcome.

--Robin.rueth 21:42, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your vote, and HDI discussion underway ...

[edit]

Hello! I hope you're well. I'd like to thank you for participating in the vote earlier to include the HDI in the country infobox/template. Yay!

After a lengthy gestation, a discussion piece has been prepared to help give form to the vote. If you've a preference for how and where this information should appear in the infobox, and if you're around :), I'd appreciate it if you head on over there and comment. :)

After a decision is arrived at, if at all, I'm also hopeful to prevail upon you to add the values (if you're willing and comfortable) for a handful of countries; the more people doing it, the less time it will take to implement the vote and realise the fruits of our collective labour.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks again for your co-operation! E Pluribus Anthony 04:12, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MFD

[edit]

Thank for trying to clean the Wikipedia namespace by nominating some pages in WP:MFD, but why didn't you follow the normal procedures by putting a template on the nominated page, and create a subpage of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion for each one? CG 18:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I did, at least that was the intent, but maybe I missed one? Which one(s) are you referring to? Radiant_>|< 18:28, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, the problem wasn't coming form you. It was caused by a revert war on Template:mfd about using either Miscellany or Miscellaneous as name for the subpages (silly war). Again, sorry for bothering you. CG 18:51, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all! Revert war you say? Hm, I'll take a look. Such templates may need protection. Radiant_>|< 21:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I started a new article, maybe you'd be interested. Yuber(talk) 00:55, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

that presence/occupation/tutelle/wisaya/thing

[edit]

Thanks for the comment. As you can no doubt imagine, I feel somewhat constrained in discussing the question. However, John McW seems to be on some sort of crusade. I don't know whether you have noticed further ramifications of this in Syria, where he has repeatedly been adding detailed information about the presence of Syrian workers in Lebanon quoting "Lebanese scholar Habib Issa". As a result of reverting over this, Yuber has now got himself banned from editing that article. Your view as to how relevant and accurate these insertions are might be helpful should they reappear (they're still gone at the moment). Palmiro 15:48, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

problem with English

[edit]

I noticed your comment on the help desk about writing in English. If you have something short in French or Arabic, I'll be more than happy to translate it for you, or to help you write it in English - let me know if required. Palmiro | Talk 14:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have tried to produce English corresponding to these points, let me know if it is the sort of thing you were looking for or if I can improve it.
By the way, you might take a look at Talk:Democratic Left (Lebanon) - I'm suggesting a move. Palmiro | Talk 12:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HDI

[edit]

Hi there; thanks for your note. The discussion hasn't stopped per se: as its moderator, I was allowing sufficient time to collect various user opinions. I intend on closing it on 30 Nov. (and a consensus does seem to be forming); I will then post results and a process for updating the relevant country infoboxes (and ask that interested users update 20 or so records each for expediency). Then I can update the template and ... tada! Make sense? Thanks for your input and patience. E Pluribus Anthony 21:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HDI discussion concluded and next steps ... pitch in!

[edit]

Hello again! The discussion to determine the appearance of the HDI in the country/infobox template has been concluded, with an outline for moving forward. Please consider entering some metadata; we will more quickly realise the fruits of our labour if more users do so. In any event, thanks again for your participation! E Pluribus Anthony 02:48, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Empty talk pages

[edit]

Hi there. I haven't made any empty talk pages. I just removed "{{Arabic}}" from them after adding the Arabic scripts needed, as requested here. --Mohammed Khalil 23:50, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Can you explain the purpose of Template:FAOL text - I'm not sure I understand what it is meant to do. It just shows up as a redlinked template on Wikipedia:Templates with red links. Cheers! BD2412 T 01:40, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the information - it's a fascinating project you're working on, and I may take a stab at writing some of the redlinked articles there. I'll leave your template in peace. Cheers! BD2412 T 18:25, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

tutelle, again

[edit]

Why thank you! I have actually edited the template text on your test-2 page - see if it is helpful.

Re wisaya, I'm not sure. I'm sure you can understand that I feel somewhat constrained in discussing this topic. If I have any flash of inspiration I'll let you know. Palmiro | Talk 12:56, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image replaced and up for deletion

[edit]

Hi, I've replaced two images uploaded by you with SVG versions, because SVG is a more suitable format for images with no photographic content:

The original images have been listed for deletion—hope this is OK. –Mysid 07:15, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CIA Arabic site

[edit]

Thanks for the information. I was mostly just curious what the CIA was doing with a page in Arabic and if it was propaganda or what. 216.159.75.180 15:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

French

[edit]

I am a new student of french language. I find it fascinatingly precise, elegant, and a delight to hear spoken. I began my study with an overriding desire, to one day perform my own translation of Bastiat's 'La Loi' (June, 1850). Not to take anything from Dean Russell's popular english translation, but on such a subject, I feel it quite important to read the original for myself. Is that the kind of thing you were speaking of at the pump? I would be interested in building multilingual pages for both the pamphlet, and its author. (respond here, I'll check back) 68.110.237.166 21:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I didn't quite get your point (I'm only at an intermediate level of English), but you are always welcome to translate any page from any language. The project I was talking about is to join French-speaker wikipedians and collaborate together in translating some quality articles from the French wikipedia in English. CG 22:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images on the MainPage

[edit]

Hello, Cedar-Guardian. Please be reminded that everything on the MainPage must be protected to avoid vandalism. For images, please see Category:Protected main page images. Thanks. -- PFHLai 08:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE: new collaboration project

[edit]

I am already listed as a translator, but I haven't been active since then. JB82 17:59, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

French translations

[edit]

Salut, CG! J'ai répondu à ton message à ma page personnelle. — BrianSmithson 18:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another small question — I read your user page, and the English is very good. However, I do see a few spots where your usage is not completely idiomatic. If you are interested, I can make some very minor changes and then answer any questions you may have about them. I know that I certainly find such corrections helpful when I am writing in French! — BrianSmithson 18:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cedar, I'd be very interested in helping out too. This is actually how I got my start at Wikipedia--the French wiki's coverage of West African topics is generally much better than ours. If you get a project page up and running, drop me a note! Many thanks, --Dvyost 19:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I'd have time to participate in a whole project, but I find an interesting topic on fr: that we don't have on en:, I often translate it if I have the time (mostly crusade articles). Adam Bishop 19:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to join the project. I've done a number of translations from fr: before, I've even done some in the other direction, my writing isn't nearly as good as my reading though! - FrancisTyers 22:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would be interested too, I'm French and not very confident at writing English, while I have no comprehension problems. --pankkake 20:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cedar Guy! Thanks for the notice. Count on me. We've somehow already started thinking of doing something. Grenavitar and me have been thinking to translate Voile islamique en France but due to some circumstances, our work is a bit delayed. Cheers -- Svest 00:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)  Wiki me up™[reply]

I'd be happy to participate; only slight problem: I do wiki at work, and so have only limited access to the net (excluding, sorry about that, the french wiki). But if someone would provide me with a copypaste of a French article (I could create a subpage where it can be moved to), I'd be more than happy to oblige. Lectonar 08:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I would be more than happy to participate, though there are no guarantees that I'd be able to contribute large amounts. Darobsta 08:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I would be happy to participate as well. J2rome 07:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

your new project

[edit]

Yes, I'd be willing to participate (not necessarily every week, but more than once a month?) Mamawrites 21:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, would be more than happy to participate in this project. Frenchgeek 22:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea to me! It'd be good to focus on the topics that only exist, or are far better developed in the French-language Wikipedia. Regards, Redux 01:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

French Collaboration/Translations --- putting the plan into action

[edit]

For starting a new French collaboration project, see the info on Wikipedia:Collaborations. Before starting the French page, I see two questions that need to be answered by the group at large:

  1. Should there be an indication of frequency (e.g. "of the week") in the page/project title (like Wikipedia:Spanish Translation of the Week) or should there be none (like Wikipedia:European Union collaboration).
  2. Should we go with "collaboration" or "translation"? I myself am a little apprehensive of the title "Wikipedia:French Collaboration" for obvious historical reasons. "Wikipedia:French Translation of the Week" however seems a little dull. Maybe "Wikipedia:French Collaboration Project" or Wikipedia:France Collaboration"?

Comments? --NYArtsnWords 18:28, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure all working together on an article each week would be the best way to organize this project; it seems that that might result in a lot of duplicated effort. Would it be possible to set up a page that simply lists high-priority translation articles (topics covered in the French wiki but not here), and we can just grab them individually? --Dvyost 18:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you. I'm not a big fan of the "of the week" task. I'm more for a list of high-priority translations (perhaps by subject matter... "featured articles from French", missing articles in the en wiki on French history, lit, arts, people...) and perhaps some other French collaborative projects (stubs, stubsorting, cats) that anyone can work on. --NYArtsnWords 19:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, but I think that we should emphasise on the "collaboration" term, I would prefer we work hard on one article for an amount of time, rather than working on many things at a time. But each individual work is highly welcomed. So we could base our project on a collaboration on one hand and some other tasks on the other hand. CG 19:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Should we just follow the lead of the Spanish collaboration, and maybe call our page something along the lines of "The French Collaborative Translation Project"? I am not too concerned about duplicating work. We can check back on the page that we are working on, and see what needs to be done there. I'm thinking that maybe we shouldn't have a set time limit, because some articles may take longer than others to translate, and once we finish with one article, we can start on a new one. Frenchgeek 01:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer not to put "of the week" in the title of the effort, because we may discover that some articles take more than a week, and others take less. "French Collaboration Project" would be OK. "France Collaboration" seems to imply that we would only translate articles on topics pertaining to France, and I think that this restricts the scope of the project unnecessarily. Perhaps something like the "French Featured Articles Collaborative Translation Team"? It's a little wordy, but it has a sort-of cool acronym... we could make the shortcut WP:FFACTT which might inspire others... like G-FACT-Team, R-FACT-Team, etc. Mamawrites 02:57, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just my 2 cents here: I think we should go along with the procedure and the name of the Spanish collaboration (only monthly); this is a good working project (btw, they don't have much of a problem with redundancies). And a little bythought: let's try keep this as uninformal as possible, and do not put to much strain on everyone by making high priority tasks et al.; also, don't pour to much in it for the beginning (as the idea above about stubs etc.), but let's just stick to translations at first. Don't forget, c'est facultatif. Lectonar 07:31, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I did a first write for a project page -- borrowing heavily from Wikipedia:Spanish Translation of the Week, but also behoven to Dvyost's suggestions -- and saved it at Wikipedia:French Collaboration Project. Change it, move it, rename it, do whatever... for right now it's a working document and a rough draft, nothing more (I haven't done anything else at this stage -- like redirects or templates or wikilinks -- that'll happen only when everyone is cool with the project). --NYArtsnWords 19:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would like that this project emphasises on French translation and not France-related articles like it's stated on the page that you've created. Since the main source of nomination are French featured articles, very few of them are related to this country. And also, is archiving or moving failed nominations really necessary? It may be less complicated if they just be deleted. Anyway, I want to congratulate you for the great progress in this project. CG 19:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

French translation of the week

[edit]

I'd love to participate in such a project! Please keep me posted on its status. --Zantastik 10:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please reconsider your support of the expansion of the culture of Asia article and consider nominating it for deletion. There is nothing unifying about cultures as diverse as Israel, Lebanon, Pakistan, former Soviet Republics, China, Vietnam, Taiwan, Indonesia, Nepal, Japan... many of these countries have very very little movement or information flow between them... the very idea of "Asia" doesn't even make sense geographically. It's something of a "not Europe, but on the same landmass as Europe..."

Lebanon stuff

[edit]

hi there

I'm after making some changes to the article on the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, think you're likely to get a chance to look over it? Also I happened to come across Lebanon crisis of 1958 which is a pathetic not-much-more-than-stub almost entirely focussed on the role of the US and Fuad Chehab which reads like a hagiography. Just in case you didn't have enough to be getting on with.. Palmiro | Talk 05:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

[edit]

You voted for Lee Smith (baseball), this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.

hi CG

I am after making some remarks on Talk:Allah about how the opening of this article is phrased, in relation to who uses the term Allah and how, and how it is seen in other countries. Perhaps you might be able to help work out how to deal with the issue. Hope all's well, Palmiro | Talk 04:17, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just to be clear, I didn't have anything to do with the writing of the article, I just came to it and was a bit put out by how it was phrased. I find it very annoying how little people know about Arab and Middle Eastern Christians! I think your suggestions make sense. Thanks, Palmiro | Talk 16:07, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Qala'un Mosque

[edit]

Hi, would you care to explain on Talk:Qala'un Mosque why you removed it from the GA list? Thanks, — mark 16:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Cedar-Guardian! I wanted to sincerely thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with a final result of 55/14/3. Your support means a lot to me! If you have any questions or input regarding my activities, be they adminly or just a "normal" user's, or if you just want to chat about anything at all, feel free to drop me a line. Cheers! —Nightstallion (?) 07:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arab League template

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you just added {{Arab League}} to the base of each member country. I'm sorry for reverting an effort that must have taken some time, but such templates on country articles have been deprecated for some time, after lengthy discussions at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Countries. Since most countries belong to at least a half dozen international organizations, which creates quite a mess at the bottom of articles when a box is added for each. Another option is a customized international ties template replacing both the geographical and organization boxes, such as is in use on United Kingdom. - SimonP 14:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the main issue is that international ties templates take a lot of work to create and so far have only been done for major nations. For Middle Eastern countries this will also eliminate the current situation of needlessly having both the Southwest Asia and Middle East templates. - SimonP 22:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can't remember what exactly was not right when I first played with this, but, it firstly has a few technical limitations:

  • It does not work for images more than 100px in height
  • It does not work for images more than 3 non-breaking spaces in 100px-size font width
  • It cannot be placed on the same line as text

By being built using CSS tricks, it also does not work consistently on web browsers without full support thereof, or that need to play games with the CSS themselves. For example, web browsers for mobile phones (such as Opera with its small and medium screen rendering) which have to modify the page layout so that it is suitable for smaller screens display this as an image linked to the image page, or worse (if the image is unable to be displayed at the required width) as the image title text linked to the image page...

So, unless I can find what I may have complained about earlier, I will only say that it should not be used unless necessary. jnothman talk 01:52, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AID

[edit]

If you have time, please take a look at my concerns about the Article Improvement Drive nomination of Cold War posted here. Thanks. 172 23:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You helped choose {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} as this week's WP:ACID winner

[edit]
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Hi there

I'd be interested in your views on the discussion that's going on about the possible renaming of this page.

All the best, Palmiro | Talk 14:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Asteroid deflection strategies was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Request for assistance: Please place this notice at the top of the Main Page:

[edit]

Voting for the new Main Page has begun! There are several candidates to choose from. Voting ends January 28th. To see the candidates, CLICK HERE



If you think the voting time should be extended another week, feel free to change the ending date to February 4th.

Thank you. --Go for it! 00:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Project

[edit]

Hi, my name is Federico (alias Pain) and I am creating a section for nominating th best user page, I was wondering if you were interested in joining the project.

The project has just started, and we need help to spread the word and ameliorate it.

Wikipedia:Votes_for_best_User_page

Best regards, Federico Pistono 14:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Little Boy

[edit]

Hi CG,

I'm a bit disappointed by the lack of activity on Little Boy by the translators. When I provided my initial rough translation, I expected that it would be edited much more than it has, especially since many people have signed up as translators. Is the translation supposed to be completed already ? I find that some of the style that I used is far from perfect, as I'm not a native English speaker. What are your thoughs ? -- Ze miguel 14:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries anon

[edit]

Oh, I think at this point we should just ban whatever IP he shows up with. I don't imagine he has infinite patience. --Fastfission 13:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanon stubs

[edit]

Merhaba. Please do not remove "MEast-geo-stub"s from Lebanese geography-related articles. Articles under these geo-stubs are watched by User:Grutness. When there will be 65 Lebanese geography-related stubs, new stub called "Lebanon-geo-stub" will be created. - Darwinek 17:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK. According to User:Grutness/Geo-stub tallying. More than 20 articles are needed to make pass Lebanon-geo-stub. It is just a matter of time when it will happen. - Darwinek 17:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to {{qif}}

[edit]

Your change to {{qif}} caused an extra blank line to appear everywhere this template was used; in some cases this meant multiple extra blank lines because it is sometimes used many times in succession. This is generally the case with <noinclude> sections in templates: you should always avoid extra line-feeds before and after if at all possible. Please be more careful when you make changes like this in future.

I'm sorry you stumbled into this: that template probably should have had the {{esoteric}} label on it already. I hope you aren't put off by this. By the way, why actually did you make that change? I couldn't figure out from your contributions today what might have made you think it was necessary. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 18:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merxaba

[edit]

User_talk:Sargonious#I.27ve_devised_a_Romanized_Assyrian_Alphabet.

Semi protect list of nuke states?

[edit]

Agreed. Guinnog 15:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree as well, I don't think there's any choice at this point. Reason has failed. --DV8 2XL 16:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cynna Neele

[edit]

Thanks. :) I'm not sure what I can do about photos - I'm not very good with writing permission letters. I was thinking I'd wait until the season starts in May and borrow someone's camera. Ambi 02:45, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

french translation project

[edit]

Hi CG,

I have a small proposal for next month's translation: I think we should post a list of things that need to be done, then people would be able to come in and add their names to the list, and once the process is completed, the article is done.

I'd propose something like this:

  • Initial translation of paragraphs 1-5
    • user1 -> done
  • Initial translation of paragraphs 6-10
    • user2 -> done
  • Copyediting
    • user3 -> done
    • user4 -> ongoing
    • user5 -> not done

What do you think ?

-- Ze miguel 12:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. The fact that translating a complete article may be a long work is responsible for the low activity of this project. Dividing the work in this kind of way would be a good solution. I'm for it. I'm just worried that during this process some information in the English Wikipedia will be erased. About the Little Boy article, I think the translation is finished (great work from you), do you think the commented french version could be erased? CG 18:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
I erased it. I think the article is mostly fine now, and will be improved over time anyway. If you think of other tasks, don't hesitate to add them. I'll be waiting for the next article. Cheers. -- Ze miguel 11:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your user page

[edit]

Have you abolsihed your Lebanon-portal, or just moved it somewhere else? I thought it was very good, and quite helpful, especially the two lists of articles from the French and Arabic Wikipedias (I've been meaning to write an article on زياد الرحباني for a while, by the way...). Hope all's well, in any case. Palmiro | Talk 19:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that, I have from time to time pointed it out to new contributors writing on Lebanese topics. Actually, I think it might be worthwhile having a Lebanese, or a Levantine (Lebanon + Syria + Jordan - or would that bring back too many unhappy memories) or Mashriq portal/noticeboard, like the one for Palestine. There've been quite a few new editors appearing with an interest in Lebanon and there are now also a couple quite active on Syrian topics. Palmiro | Talk 22:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least we should be able to deal with Ziad al-Rahbani and Majwa Karam without too much aggro. Hopefully. By the way, what is your view on the new (I think) Category:Ethnic Lebanese? Palmiro | Talk 13:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At first I thought its creation was part of the tendency to portray various nationalist myths as history, but looking again I think I was probably wrong. I came across it first on Lebanese Arabic, which, as that article is peculiarly susceptible to this sort of problem, made me immediately suspicious about it. But in fact the way it is presented and the list of contents both make it seem quite reasonable. Palmiro | Talk 00:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]

Thanks a lot for the barnstar, CG :) -- Ze miguel 13:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara

[edit]

Hi, here is a vote related to Western Sahara, it's about the neutrality of wikipedia in this conflict, are you interested? Daryou 18:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is Arabic Wikipedia supposed to be helpful for the article on kimono?

[edit]

Just wondering. Exploding Boy 22:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, though I must confess I'm still confused as to why Arabic Wikipedia is given as a potential source for this Japanese subject. Exploding Boy 18:09, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There's no need to keep copying everything I write here and pasting it on my talk page along with your response. We can just keep the conversation on one page (here).

I checked the Arabic article and many of the images it contains are likely to be copyrighted (there are several that I can identify as being taken from various websites), which makes them useless to us.

However, even if some of the images might be useful, I still don't see the logic in the template message you posted on the Kimono article's talk page. The fact remains that the subject is Japanese, and as such the best source is going to be the Japanese article, not a foreign-language article (which may have been translated from Japanese, or for which research may have been done in Japanese anyway). Exploding Boy 18:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The logic you're using is wrong. Wikipedia's goal is to provide articles about everything in every language. So even the Arabic wiki has the right to write about japan-related articles, and that goes also for the English wikipedia. As for the quality of the Arabic article, I agree that there isn't much we can extract from, but like I said, this template is still small, keep it just for statistical purposes. CG 19:21, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstand me. I'm certainly not suggesting that we have no right or authority to write about things in other languages. That's not the case at all. But if you agree that the images in the Arabic article are not of much use to us, then why is Arabic specifically listed in the Wikiproject Echo template you have placed on the Kimono talk page? It would seem to make a lot more sense to place a link there to the Japanese article. If it's because the article in question was a FA on Arabic Wikipedia, then surely the place to put that template would be on the Arabic- language article talk page? Plus, in light of the information I've given you about the images, perhaps the article shouldn't even be a featured article at all. Exploding Boy 21:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason this template is put is that the Arabic version of the article is a FA in the Arabic wiki regardless of wether it's really useful or the Arabic FA criterias are low. There's surely a lot of articles better than the Arabic one even though it's featured, but this project just aims at gathering a list of FAs in each language regardless of the content of the article. The only criteria is the FA status given by each wiki. CG 19:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how the template makes it seem. Exploding Boy 20:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you suggest improvments? CG 20:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Join Wikipedians for Palestine

[edit]

You are invited to join Wikipedians for Palestine. --DieWeibeRose 07:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

[edit]

Hello, I saw that you are a native speaker of Arabic, so I would like to ask you if you could take a look at 2003 invasion of Iraq and Iraq War. There is a featured article in Arabic which we would like to know how it could be used the English one which is of course dominated by people who have either been there as soldiers or have their knowledge from western media. Someone also asked if the section about "related propaganda and phrases" could be amplified with information about the Iraqi side. Maybe there are also people who took photos in Iraq at the Arabic version? Nameme 15:40, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manga

[edit]

You voted for Manga to be the comics collaboration of the month and it has been selected! Let's knock this article into shape. Remember, to make it to featured article status, it will need to be well referenced. ike9898 14:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requested!

[edit]

Hi there! How are you? I'm swamped (hence my distance) but, if you get a moment, please weigh in on this issue/poll. Thanks! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 22:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We Belong Together chart trajectories

[edit]

Perhaps you are right, but I am still reluctant to accepting the terms. Do you by chance own a program that is capable of creating a line graph such as the one in Cool (song)? —Eternal Equinox | talk 20:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right then, could you please change a few chart trajectories into one line graph using Microsoft Excel? I'd appreciate it. Thanks. —Eternal Equinox | talk 20:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to be leaving the chart trajectories with you for now, whether you accept or decline the offer to creating the image. You see, I'm going to busy later and may not receive the response until tomorrow or something (the image should be added before the We Belong Together FAC closes). I'd really appreciate it, CM! If you do decide to fulfill my request, could you structure it in a similar style to the one in Cool (song)? Again, thanks! —Eternal Equinox | talk 22:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
U.S. Billboard Hot 100 Chart trajectory
Week 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Chart position 81 61 30 12
7
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
3
5
6
9
12 15 22
UK Singles Chart trajectory
Week 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Chart position
2
3
2
5
7
9
13 24 28 30 33 35 48 61 68 75
New Zealand Singles Chart trajectory
Week 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Chart position 34 17
2
2
2
3
4
5
7
13 21 39 49 65 75 85 97

Thanks for contributing to the We Belong Together article. I was just wondering if you could make a few minor touches to the image? A single cannot reach "0" on a chart, so it should be removed. Also, I'd appreciate it if you included the New Zealand chart trajectory. Otherwise, excellent. You deserve a barnstar. —Eternal Equinox | talk 22:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For adding the chart trajectory image to We Belong Together, I award Cedar-Guardian with the original barnstar! Keep up the good work! —Eternal Equinox (Mar. 8/06).
I understand that New Zealand is not a significant music market, but Wikipedia is supposed to summarize the facts. If someone is interested in the chart trajectory of the New Zealand market, and because we have the numbers, it should be included in the image. Nonetheless, thanks. —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The remaining four weeks of the New Zealand chart trajectory for the song is in the template above that reads "New Zealand Singles Chart trajectory". It has been expanded to 17 weeks, one week longer than the song's stay on the UK chart. Once this is added, I believe that the trajectory is complete! Thanks, once again! —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The information comes from RIANZ itself. By the way, even though the chart trajectory graph is now complete, could I request that you remove the final portion reading from 101 – 110? Its usage is not relevant considering that song's do not commonly receive a recorded base of descending 100. Thanks! —Eternal Equinox | talk 22:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
RIANZ is the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand. —Eternal Equinox | talk 20:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: update about the sound icon

[edit]

Sorry, I haven't got around to asking an admin yet. You'll see from my contributions page that I haven't been around too much recently; this is partly because I started a new job this week. Feel free to ask a friendly admin yourself, if you want. T J McKenzie 03:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Current sport.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 21:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned fair use image (Image:Current sport.jpg)

[edit]
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Current sport.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 21:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be delighted to help, though I'm not sure how much time I'll be able to put into it. I agree that the current version is very faulty ("like other artificial states"? As opposed to all the natural states out there, I suppose?)? I have two of Kamal Salibi's books on Lebanese history and Samir Kassir's excellent history of Beirut at home anyway, which may be of some use.

I generally agree with your three recommendations. One thing I find rather annoying is when things that have been in the news recently takes up a ridiculous amount of space on the article on a country. Of course, this doesn't happen to the articles on the US or Britain! Palmiro | Talk 21:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been watching the article and will continue to. If it's necessary, you can request the page be protected. Post there, or message me if I can help. Tom Harrison Talk 14:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Translation

[edit]

Hi. I found you listed under Arabic-English translators and thought this section (a scan of a short letter) might be a worthwhile thing to have translated: [2]. Thanks. Azate 12:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User templates

[edit]

I just wanted to comment that you have collected a delightful array of user templates on your user page. I've pilfered some of them for my own page. I've seen them around and have been wanting to incorporate some of them, but was finally inspired to do so when I saw your pleasant selection :-) --AladdinSE 01:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keratoconus image caption

[edit]

Thanks for the pointer. I hadn't known that was possible with that template until being prompted into looking. BillC 11:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. You recently added a comment for improvement on the Keratoconus article. I'm not sure if you were aware, but at the time, Keratoconus was (and still is) a featured article candidate. If you have any views on its candidature, or any more on how the article might be improved, they would be welcome on its candidate page. --BillC 09:19, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Human

[edit]

Please do not give misleading edit summaries like you did at Human. Thanks. JoshuaZ 22:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Sorry about that, got confused with the edit differences since the edit right before yours was a POV edit. JoshuaZ 23:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request (very short text)

[edit]

Hi CG. I'm interested in writing an article on the freize in the US Supreme Court (which includes a depiction of Muhammad, amongst various other lawgivers), and I'm curious whether the Arabic visible in this image is actually a legitimate quote from the Qur'an, and if so what verse is being quoted. I'm told by Szvest that the Arabic is actually just "a random collection of words in Qur'anic style", and wondered if you'd be willing to give a second opinion. Thanks for any help you can provide! — JEREMY 07:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you may be interested in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Music#Sound_samples. Tuf-Kat 05:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just started this stub. If you have anything you would like to contribute, please consider taking a look. If no extensive details are available, I would at least like to ascertain dates of his birth and death! On-line sources are extremely sparce. I will do some library research later. Thanks. --AladdinSE 06:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Featuredcountries.png

[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you uploaded this image and I was wondering if you could alter it to reflect the recent featured article status of Pakistan. Pepsidrinka 22:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan should be green in the map as well. Pepsidrinka 16:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I'm afraid that your deletion of the above article was a bit out of process. CSD AD reads "Any article that has been discussed at Articles for Deletion (et al), where the outcome was to transwiki, and where the transwikification has been properly performed and the author information recorded." There had not been a discussion at AfD resulting in a transwiki outcome at the time of the deletion. Although the result for this gallery would probably have been the same if the AfD had been allowed to run its course, image galleries are not always deleted. There is a full discussion as to why I and others feel that a transwiki to Commons is often not a good option for image galleries at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/galleries. Dsmdgold 04:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that in order for an article to fit CSD A5 there has to be a completed AfD with the result of transwiki. This is not what happened. From the time that it was nominated until the time it was deleted was only a few hours, and if I am reading the time stamps correctly, the only result of the AfD at the time the article was deleted was that ONE editor had voted speedy. This is not the same as getting a result of speedy from AfD. Please understand that I am not asserting that this gallery should have been kept, given the chance I would have voted to delete it. However, I feel strongly that SOME galleries are a vauable addition to wikipedia and that the proper place for them is at Wikipedia, not at Commons. I understand that this is not a universally held opinion, but it is also not an isolated one. It bothers me to think that one of the galleries that I do think should be kept can be nominated, transwikied and deleted within the space of few hours. Dsmdgold 18:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to trouble you with this image once again, but as per an objection raised here, would you be able to convert all of the information in the image to a scatterplot? This is what one of the other Wikipedians suggested so that it looks more accurate. You don't have to if you don't want to, but I would certainly appreciate it. —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You do not have to fulfill this request. It has been done. Thank you nontheless. —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a second request, this one which I would appreciate your assistance. You may or may have not noticed, but Image:Mariah Carey We Belong Together chart trajectories.jpg was replaced with an easier-to-read graph, Image:Mariah Carey We Belong Together chart trajectories.png. I was wondering if you could possibly convert Image:Gwen Stefani Cool chart trajectories.jpg over to the new style that had been completed with the We Belong Together trajectory. Please respond on my talk page. —Eternal Equinox | talk 00:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD

[edit]

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_12#Template:Otheruses4, which was deleted last year, but has come back from the dead. ed g2stalk 23:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michel Aoun, again

[edit]

Hi CG, can you maybe take another look at this hagiography article? It is flitting between a version with a slight anti-Aoun POV and accuracy issues and one with a huge pro-Aoun POV and accuracy issues. There is probably not much point in me doing anything about it as it has now also attracted the attentions of a very determined editor who definitely doesn't seem to like me.

You might also like to have a look at Syrian occupation of Lebanon, specifically with regard to it being back there again and not at Syrian presence in Lebanon. Any more ideas for a fully accurate and NPOV title?

Cordialement, Palmiro | Talk 12:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Request

[edit]
Cedar, Can you translate the article Ayyavazhi to Arabic. Please... - Vaikunda Raja 22:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Templates

[edit]

Hey I wanted to know if me and a friend can take control of the WikiProject Templates. We just started WikiProject Unused Templates and it looks good. The WikiProject Templates looks dead and if you gave it to us to take control we would totaly revamp it. Thanks --Actown e 05:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will talk to my firend and then I will know what we will do. --Actown e 14:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Half-Life 2 FAC

[edit]

Hello,

I have addressed and taken action upon your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Half-Life 2/archive2. If you would be so kind as to review what I did, I would appreciate it. Thanks! Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 13:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help on Mathematics

[edit]
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Mathematics was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by Pruneau 21:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Music samples on Selena

[edit]

I added one sample in the Selena article, I don't know if I did it right though. I probaly going to upload one other sample before the night is over. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 23:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a second sample. But now I got a object vote because of it :/ Please comment again in the FAC. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 04:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CG, I have replied to your comments on the FLC. Please check and comment. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 17:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response on the FLC. If you don't mind, could you please change your vote to Support? Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanon/Temp

[edit]

At present, Lebanon/Temp is considered by the software to be a seperate article, and can therefore be found using "Random Page". As the ability to make subpages in the article: space has been removed, in order to make it a subpage, it should be moved to Talk:Lebanon/Temp. By the way, thanks for commenting on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nuclear power by country/archive1. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 18:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]