User talk:Jmcc150/Archive4

Transponder

I could use your help editing one word in the entry for the film No Country for Old Men. There is a device called a 'transponder' that appears in the movie. I'm not sure if both the signal sender and the signal receiver should both be transponders.

Do you know?

Ring Cinema (talk) 05:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. It's a hard question for me.

Ring Cinema (talk) 12:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sailplane edits

I'd like to clarify with you so we don't get into an edit battle regarding spoilers on sailplanes. To clarify my position, I have a couple thousand hours of glider time, mostly instructing. I believe spoilers are only mounted on the top of the wing with a primary function to spoil lift across a section of wing and provide only minimal drag. A Schweizer 2-22 has only spoilers. Just a piece of aluminum that hinged at the front that tips up to spoil the lift with hardly any drag. Dive brakes, on the other hand, protrude enough into the airstream to provide drag as well as spoil the lift. Dive brakes can protrude just from the top also acting as spoilers. Or they can also protrude from the bottom. A 2-33 had dive brakes with only a spoiler on top (like the 2-22) but with another 'board' hinged at the rear and protruding out the bottom. Also, 'terminal dive brake' is a correct term though I suppose they should be called "terminal velocity dive brakes" and should not be deleted. The 1-34 has terminal dive brakes. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schweizer_SGS_1-34 and http://www.skysailing.com/pages/theory.htm "Glide Path and Speed Controls" as a reference.

Let me know if you want to revert part of your edits or if you want me to.

Thanks, --14:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Rackmount-guy (talk)

Sailplane edits

I significantly expanded on the landing section of the sailplane article. Please feel free to expand or correct as you feel necessary. Rackmount-guy (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AAH

Vernix caseosa was predicted in other aquatic mammals and found. JMcC (talk) 14:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was this a prediction made because of the AAH? I don't think we can use a 2005 BBC audio play-back as proof of this, we need something published.

How about a new section after "Criticisms" Proof of the AAH - Almost no proof of the AAH has been presented and little can be expected; as Morgan says, it would be very difficult to look at the fossilised skeletons of an otter and a stoat and establish that one of them was aquatic.(p.174 of Scars) And theories need to make predictions to be of interest; it was already known that the Rift Valley fossil sites were wetter than today and that Lucy's almost complete skeleton was found amongst the remains of crocodile eggs, turtle eggs and crab claws. In 1985 a revisit of the Taung baby site concluded that it had been humid, not arid as it is today.(p.18 of Scars) Elaine Morgan might have predicted such findings, but wasn't asked, paleoanthropologists still work the same as if there was no AAH. MalcolmMcDonald (talk) 14:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes though it was the Attenborough and the BBC that initiated it. OK, add the section if you like, though there is a risk that the article becomes a debating forum, as it has before. The odd thing about fossilisation is that it often happens in sedimentary rocks and so almost everything looks aquatic! JMcC (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think we must have this in a written form somewhere before we can consider using it. MalcolmMcDonald (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Marchington

Who is he? I would really like to know. Did he go to Oxford like Graham Richards?

Also have you heard of the forgotten hero Thomas Cochrane, 10th Earl of Dundonald?

Thanks a lot.

With compliments.

DAFMM (talk), 13th July 2009.

Ok then. Cochrane is very interesting.

DAFMM (talk), 14th July 2009.

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PROD on User:JamesBWatson/Alice Liddell

I see you have placed a PROD template on this page, with the reason "An unnecessary duplication by a new user. The main Alice Liddell article still exists". I agree that the page should go, and I have blanked it and requested a speedy delete under CSD U1. My original reason for creating this page no longer applies, so thank you for prompting me to deal with it. However, I thought it might be helpful to mention that "only articles, lists, and disambiguation pages may be deleted using the Proposed deletion process" (quoted from WP:PROD); it does not apply to a userspace page. Also I am not sure I qualify as a "new user", having been here since 1 August 2006. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And Did Those Feet in Ancient Time.

I would welcome your advice. You joined in the discussion on Satanic Mills in the above article.

In the setion Dark Satanic Mills Cygnis Insignis keeps censoring the fact that one view of their meaning is the Church of England. I could simply revert again. But it seems childish

I have replied to him in discussion but to no avail. I would welcome your advice on how to avoid an edit war. Brixtonboy (talk) 23:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the onus on me to disprove accusations of censorship, POV pushing, vandalising or "instigating Edit Wars"? I will if you give this stratagem your tacit endorsement. Do you think the revision history and talk page will support Brixtonboy's version of who said and did what? Assume, if only for a moment, that these unverified accusations are the antithesis of my approach to editing and review the situation again. cygnis insignis 09:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the sane word. It looks like it has gone unheeded. But hey.Brixtonboy (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lasham Airfield

HI Jmcc150,

Is there a problem with using the convert template; you reverted just one of the instances that I added to the article? Your edit summary didn't quite make sense to me. Bleakcomb (talk) 13:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure we are talking on the same frequency? Seeing that you have no problem with the use of the convert template, I have reverted your edit to put it back in. Thanks. Bleakcomb (talk) 01:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gliding competition grid.JPG

I made an answer here da:Brugerdiskussion:MGA73#Big_relicensing_migration. --MGA73 (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pandy

I think youhave misunderstood my request. Pandy is the Welsh for fulling mill, so that the article on fulling mills should be there. There already is a disambiguation page Pandy (disambiguation). What I am proposing is that that page should be renamed to Pandy. This will mean that the article deals with these places, which is I suspectwhat you are wanting. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Wirral map.JPG

File:Wirral map.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Wirral map.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Wirral map.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Glider (disambiguation)

Thanks for your edits to this page. Unfortunately I'm not sure they were constructive. Please see my comments at Talk:Glider (disambiguation)#Recent edits to this page where I have opened a discussion on the tipic. Thanks --MegaSloth (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi perhaps you missed the link above? At this link:

Talk:Glider (disambiguation)#Recent edits to this page

I am quite specific about the reasons for my comment, and address many of the concerns you raise in your message. As other editors were involved, I think it would be best to discuss it there. --MegaSloth (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmcc150. You have new messages at MegaSloth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jmcc150! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 316 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Howard Kendall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Glider Cockpit.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Glider Cockpit.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmcc150. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_January_18#File:Glider_Cockpit.JPG.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— BQZip01 — ^talk 00:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission will answer most of your questions and provides a step-by-step guide as to how to accomplish what you desire. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Glider Cockpit.JPG

Hello, Jmcc150. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello Jmcc150. Thank you for your edit here [1] that corrected the title of the music. I was just listening to that song on the Delerue Music from the films of Truffaut CD last night. I thought that was an interesting coincidence so I wanted to take the time to say thanks. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 19:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks for your note. I find that very first ep of An Unearthly Child a remarkable piece of TV sci fi. Even all these years later it is fascinating. Those who saw it originally must have wondered what they had just experienced. Katy M is a treat. In her DVD commentary for the last ep of The Green Death she is almost in tears remembering how special her time on the show was. I don't know if you've ever seen Life Story. It makes the story of the discovery of the structure of DNA very exciting. The Delarue music is used twice. Once in the scene where Crick and Watson are showing their colleagues the finished model of DNA and again at the end of the film where it is played during the closing credits. I have never been able to tell for sure but I think that they recorded a new version of the song rather then just using the one from Day For Night. Though I could be wrong about this the play time seems longer - especially the time it is played at the end of the film - and is played at a slightly slower speed. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find it on DVD and my tape is getting older. Back in '06 it accompanied a set of film clips during the Academy Awards telecast and it was this thread at IMDb [2] that lead me to the CD. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 04:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delerue Update. You may have already seen this but I wanted to let you know that "Le Grand Choral" is used at a couple of points in the recent stop motion animation film Fantastic Mr. Fox. Now this film may not be the kind of thing that you enjoy but I wanted to let you know about it anyway. Also, I enjoyed the the Ron Grainer quote about Delia Derbyshire and his Dr Who theme. There is a brief but nice tribute to him on the DVD set for the series Flickers. If you haven't seen it I can't recommend this series highly enough. It is about the early days of films and features Bob Hoskins and Frances de la Tour (who are marvelous together) and aired in 1980. Wikipedia does not have a page for it and even Imdb's page [3] is lacking in detail, including the fact that Grainer wrote the music for it. Hope you are well and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 00:31, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAI

In FAI_Gliding_Commission#Gliding records you've added a record as 'to be ratified'. The heading for that section says 'Records that had not yet been ratified have not been included.' Those two statements are inconsistent ....

Now amended JMcC (talk) 10:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Countenance divine

I have opened an AfD for Countenance divine at WP:Articles for deletion/Countenance divine if you are interested. Tb (talk) 01:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gliding FAR

I have nominated Gliding for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I don't have e-mail settings in my preferences since I'm very private with things like e-mail addresses. Even if I wasn't, I haven't had working e-mail from a provider since upgrading to broadband anyway. There are two other ways I can think of to do this. One is to make a copy of the article in your userspace, and I can come in and add tags; if this is your choice, see WP:CWW to check what attribution will be required. The other is for me to list where cites are needed on the FAR page. Please tell me which you would prefer. Sorry I can't be of more help on the e-mail front. Oh, and the extra code was in reference 56, not 55. My mistake. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 16:27, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added cite tags at User:Jmcc150/gliding at the ends of paragraphs that need more citing, either overall or at the end. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 19:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cattle Brands

Hi, I see you PRODed your own article on Cattle brands. Instead of that, you can request it to be speedily deleted under [[WP:CSD#G7|]] (author requests deletion) where it will be deleted much faster. I have taken the liberty to already tag it because of your request. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 03:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the admin redirected it to Livestock branding instead. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 04:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Leslie

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Rose Leslie. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brought up Warthill, Aberdeenshire. Educated England. Verifiably Scottish. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am convinced by her family tree. Kittybrewster ☎ 10:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gliding articles for Version 0.8

Hi, I'm not sure what the problem was, but you can now see this list, which include these six articles: Gliding, Wind shear, Glider_(sailplane), Paragliding, [List of X-planes]], Sea breeze. Please let me know if there is anything wrong with the selection. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 08:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caterpillar Club

You are in Edit history as an editor on this article. It has been multiply tagged for improvement as an alternative to being recommended for deletion. This is a request for editorial intervention to improve this article. Please help if possible.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Project

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to note my appreciation for being one of the people that helped to raise the quality of the Manhattan Project article.

This user helped promote Manhattan Project to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suze Rotolo

Thanks for your contribution to Rotolo article. I've tried to add an online link to The Times obituary. Mick gold (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rugmark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugmark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugmark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 17:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gliders

Hi, I have replied to your message at User_talk:Steelpillow#Glider — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 18:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About that glider video

I thought the video helped showcase motion of gliders in flight, why do you think it wasn't useful? Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took your feedback to heart, and searched through my raw video materiel and found a slightly longer more interesting clip but it was quite bumpy. I did my best to stabilize it digitally in the software Shake and added a view from the cockpit. I hope that these efforts make File:Glider2010-overgunma.ogv a more interesting video file for you (it is now a total of 20 seconds). Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Winter solstice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mean time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Joseph Mawle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BTEC and Prep school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gliding New Zealand

Hi. I've restored Gliding New Zealand per your request on my talk page and in accordance with WP:PROD. Usually an editor who's made a significant contribution to the page would usually be notified by the person nominating the page for deletion rather than by the admin closing the PROD, which was my role. It's in relation to other proposed deletion closures that you'll find comments on my talk page, since I do a large number of PROD closures. Despite your assertion, I don't think anyone else on there actually accused me of failing to notify them, did they? Cheers - Whouk (talk) 16:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Good thing about PROD is that although stuff can be relatively easily deleted, anyone is able to request its restoration! Whouk (talk) 21:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gliding New Zealand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliding New Zealand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliding New Zealand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aung_San_Suu_Kyi

Pls go to this link "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aung_San_Suu_Kyi" for Aung_San_Suu_Kyi and correct the Date of Birth of her husband, it should be 1946 NOT 1972. Many thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.179.196.208 (talk • contribs)

Momentum rewritten

Jmcc150, I have completely rewritten the first two sections of Momentum (now called "Basics" and "Conservation"). I'd appreciate it if you'd look at those sections and tell me if there there is anything that is still confusing. Ignore the lead for now. RockMagnetist (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	By starting with a move discussion at Talk:Glider aircraft, rather than just requesting the move, and doing it by the book, you've made everyone's life easier. Especially mine. Wily D 10:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Birkenhead School

I've no reason to doubt that you're right, but we really ought to reflect the information published on websites, rather than what we "know" to be correct, don't you think? Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - obviously some pages get updated before other pages! Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Shepheard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civic Trust (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Piggott

Hi. I removed the needs infobox tag using Rater. Have a log at the edit summary - the minus sign in front of needs means I removed it. Hope this clarifies things. -needs-infobox; Aviation: -needs-infobox Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Fleming

Please read WP:BLP before posting passive-aggressive messages on my talk page. Giant Snowman 14:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am genuinely surprised by your response. It was not my intention to be aggressive and I still find it hard to see anything that contravenes WP guidelines. As I said it was just curiosity. I honestly thought that things had moved on and that zapping all unreferenced material in living biographies was now official policy. It seemed a shame and so I wrote. I had just assumed that you are more au fait with the myriad of WP:XXs than I am. Should I now believe it was just a simple error on your part? JMcC (talk) 14:47, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It contravenes WP:BLP; I may seem stricter in my application than other editors but we have to be. Giant Snowman 16:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forces in flight.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Forces in flight.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Shepheard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Press|date=Jan 2006|url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/76855|accessdate=14 Aug 2013]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Philip Toosey 2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Philip Toosey 2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Philip Toosey 1942.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Philip Toosey 1942.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilfrid Gordon Lindsell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eighth Army and British Expeditionary Force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Charlesworth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melvill Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Physical Laboratory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melvill Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woolwich Arsenal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David John Pearson

I raised the question at WP:BLP/N, with no response. Should it be taken somewhere else? Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think I'll wait a while longer, but then go to AFD. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Micky Dolenz may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}</ref>Samantha Juste died following a stroke on February 5, 2014.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cookies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abernethy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Philip Toosey 2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Philip Toosey 2.JPG, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 30 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:17, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I went to considerable effort to get these photos several years ago and got permission from the family. I am not prepared to spend any more time on this to satisfy additional nit-picking rules.JMcC (talk) 09:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NSRW on Birkenhead

Re: "Birkenhead" . The New Student's Reference Work . 1914. and "I don't see why a link is needed to an obscure reference work that does add any additional information."

It is a different point of view, from the U.S. 100 years ago. How it summarizes the information I think is interesting. There is an intermediate population figure which I don't see elsewhere. It is comforting that it confirms the trend noted in the History section. I don't think it is needed, but I think it is useful. The Wikisource 1911 Britannica has a Birkenhead article at this point (

Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). 1911. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)). It is more elaborate, but it hasn't been proofread at this point, and I don't think it is ready for posting. And there is that big blank spot with no in-line links. Library Guy (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julia Samuel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Mary's Hospital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FAI Gold Air Medal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Doolittle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mont Chaberton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triple Alliance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wirral Peninsula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:LS40075.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LS40075.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:NB3DT6321.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NB3DT6321.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:OL0026.jpg. If there are any others you know of from the source, they will end up being tagged for deletion sooner or later without evidence of permission. Sorry about this. Kelly ^hi! 18:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

I've moved your stub to Linsey Pollak, no "d", which seems from all the sources to be the way it's spelled - you seemed determined to have a "d" in it, even adding " [http://www.linseypollak.com lindsey pollak.com]"! (I replaced that using the {{official website}} template). Worth looking out for weird spellings of names to make sure we get it right. Happy Editing! PamD 12:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:K13 glider.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:K13 glider.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Derek Piggott.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Piggott.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Varley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Varley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1395970/Elizabeth-Varley.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elizabeth Varley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages West End and Beaulieu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:LS40075.jpg

Hello, Jmcc150. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:LS40075.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 16:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Corgi.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Corgi.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Schempp-Hirth Ventus 3. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Auditory exostoses

Jmcc150, I'm trying to redraft the Aquatic ape hypothesis page and was checking the reference you added about them being found at Lake Ndutu near Olduvai. But looking at the book you cited, the only reference I can find in the Google version is on page 51, which is the section about the Ngandong12 specimen from Java. I don't have direct access to the book. Do you have a copy? If so, can you give me a page number for the reference to exostoses at Lake Ndutu. Chris55 (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply (on my page). I see that p159 of AAH talks of abnormalities "consistent with the diagnosis of external auditory canal exostoses". I'm not an expert so I can't tell whether that's a correct observation or not. But it certainly explains it. Chris55 (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jmcc150. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably / not probably

I was looking at the change to Birkenhead by the IP and thinking that while the edit summary was inaccurate, the change was actually not that bad. I have never seen any other suggestion for the origin of the name. Any reason why 'probably' is being used, is there a rival theory? Figured I'd ask yourself directly as I can see no discussion on the talk page. Koncorde (talk) 12:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree. Koncorde (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MAUD Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Pegram. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thermals

Before I re-instate my edit of the article that I took to featured status, may I ask you to state your qualifications as a glider pilot? There are places where the thermals will last for hours. May I suggest "flows"? My image of a bubble is a spherical object created by soap. JMcC (talk) 10:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David writes: Thank you for asking. However, my qualifications as a pilot should be relatively irrelevant as I thought Wikipedia relied upon referenced materials like the related wikipedia article I referenced. In any case, I have nearly 1,500 hours of soaring in a dozen or so countries with hang gliders and gliders where thermals are a significant part of our flying phenomena. I teach advanced hang glider pilots how to soar thermals and in 1977 was the first pilot to teach leading Japanese pilots how to fly long distance, including their first formal use of thermals. I've even observed butterflies soaring a thermal bubble - not a stream (not yet published). (I see you are from UK, where I loved soaring Devil's Dyke !)

I can understand your concern when thinking of a spherical bubble shape as made by soap. Thermals are actually shaped much like a doughnut; a torus. However, pilots and aviation writers most commonly call them "bubbles."

The wikipedia Thermals article says it fairly well "Generally, when the air is cold, bubbles of warm air are formed by the ground heating the air above it and can rise like a hot air balloon." "Flows" can be accurate as can "streams" for well-developed specific (some would say excellent) conditions; and they can indeed last for hours. However, both terms ignore the majority of thermals which are bubbles that form, then pop off the ground and are fairly discrete and coherent - with no connection to subsequent bubbles formed from the same place.

An atomic bomb explosion is a weak example, but it it is useful by providing a dynamic visual depiction of how a thermal forms. The initial heat on the ground soon rises to make a mushroom cloud. Soon after the cloud becomes coherent and disconnects from its ground heated source. Even when normal solar-generated thermals are making streams or flows, they typically generate enough clouds that they cut off the solar radiation causing the thermals, until the clouds adequately dissipate and the cycle restarts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DDilworth (talk • contribs) 18:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jmcc150. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DG Flugzeugbau

Re: this, please see this. If the original edit was valid, fine, thanks for restoring. Giant Snowman 16:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hang Gliding

Hi. You reverted one of my edits and I reverted it again. I've stated that Hang gliding is still Gliding.101.178.163.208 (talk) 06:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the web-site of the governing body for air sports Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, you will see that there is a sport called Gliding, and another sport called Hang gliding. Gliding is a sport that uses sailplanes. Hang gliding uses foot-launched aircraft. These are quite distinct. They have their own championships at different places. The equivalent would be mixing Rugby League and Rugby Union in the same article even though they contain the same word, use the same ball and goal-posts. What links the sports, as well as other forms of flight, is that they involve Gliding flight. I think you are trying to show this link between the sports in the wrong article. You can see a comparison of the two types of aircraft in Glider (sailplane). I have been flying gliders for 36 years and I have written a book on the subject. Please acknowledge that there are people out there with more knowledge that you. The history on your talk page indicates that you find this difficult to accept. I have to preserve the quality of this featured article and so your reversion must be reverted. JMcC (talk) 08:52, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that there many people who know more than you and me. Thanks for that. You too need to acknowledge that people make good faith edits and that I was mistaken. I did take a look at the Gliding flight though. You are right; that article would be more appropriate and not the Gliding article. 101.178.163.208 (talk) 07:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jmcc150. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]