User talk:Lindenhurst Liberty

Welcome!

Hello, Lindenhurst Liberty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Dan56. Your recent edit to the page The Weeknd appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lindenhurst Liberty, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Lindenhurst Liberty! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Band or group

Why do you keep moving band pages? (I.e. the moved from Coming of Age (band) to Coming of Age (group)? A band is a group of people who make music. A group is less specific. Almost all articles about bands that require disambiguation use the term band, not group. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving pages to ...(group) pages. This is not in keeping with the norm at Wikipedia, and is not helpful. The move of Blaque to Blaque (group) is particularly problematic, as the page, at its original location, presented no problems and does not need a disambiguating phrase. Please stop working and take time to discuss why you are doing what you are doing. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted page move

Again, I have reverted your move of Starshell to Starshell (singer) as the disambiguating term is not needed (there is no other Starshell article on Wikipedia). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé

Uh-oh, you might get into hot water with the Beyoncé nuts by implying that the star was only 11 when she started out in Girl's Tyme, lol--Aichik (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Like It (Sevyn Streeter song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Like It (Sevyn Streeter song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Like It (Sevyn Streeter song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stefan2 (talk) 15:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:CHERISH.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CHERISH.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CHERISH.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CHERISH.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in biography articles

Please note that I have reverted your edit at Malika Haqq as the website you linked to does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources. While it's certainly appreciated that you would like to add references to articles, please ensure you review the guideline linked above to ensure the sources are reliable. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, multiple consecutive edits

Hello LL- Here are a couple general editing notes you might consider:

When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered. Regards, Eric ^talk 14:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alex Trebek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sudbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Huertas

I meant to revert your edits with an explanation, and I hit the wrong button. Sorry about that. We need a more reliable source than TV Guide for Huertas's birth date, particularly given that there's some dispute as to when he was born. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gotye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montmorency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George H. W. Bush

Lindenhurst Liberty, sorry, but I have reverted your edits. Adding those commas is unnecessary, and terms like "El Salvador" need not be wikilinked (WP:OVERLINK, major geographic entity). In addition, this was incorrect. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:54, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liam Hemsworth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Hi, can you please not make edits like this (I've seen you make several). The templates were not broken so your changes did not make any difference, they just effectively wasted Wikimedia's resources. Thanks. –anemone projectors– 19:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Birth/date templates

Hello, I've seen you edit birth/date templates of articles of quite a lot of articles to show either "Birth date and age" or "birth date age". Note that either one does not effect the outcome of the template, i.e. what you're doing isn't making a difference. Feel free to drop me a talk page note if you need any infobox help. Regards. —JennKR | ☎ 18:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lindenhurst Liberty, other editors have previously requested that you discontinue the unnecessary and minute changes you continue to make to the 'birth date and age' templates, as well as your overlinking of common terms, yet you continue to make these same trivial (and sometimes incorrect) changes without responding to any of the concerns raised here. Could you please leave a message here to show that you have at least read the advice provided by other editors here? --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the advice provided by other editors and i will not edit the birthdate templates no more, because what i am doing isn't making a difference and I have realize that. Lindenhurst Liberty (talk) 15:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding - it's always worrisome when messages are being left and you're unsure if they are being read. You seem to enjoy WikiGnome type activities; the 'Help out' section of the Wikipedia:Community portal has a wide variety of topics listed where your help would certainly be appreciated! --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Kiss Land, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 23:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matt Wachter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Space Camp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi there. You seem to make a lot of edits that are, for lack of a better description, either pointless (like replacing en dash glyphs with en dash code) or unhelpful, such as subjective changes from "References" to "Notes" and so on. Could you please at least try to use an edit summary that explains your changes so people know what you're trying to accomplish? Some things (like referencing style) are a matter of personal preference and you shouldn't arbitrarily change them without discussion and agreement with the article's primary editors. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 22:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is disappointing Lindenhurst Liberty as you told me in the section "Birth/date templates" above that you had read the advice provided and would no longer make trivial and unnecessary changes to the templates (WP:OVERLINK has also been pointed out to you before, and yet it continues unabated). Do you still not understand that the majority of your edits do not improve the readability of the article whatsoever? You're certainly keen, and Wikipedia needs wikignomes, but you are essentially making hundreds upon hundreds of null edits.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 23:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ponyo, I know you been watching me make those same birthdate template edits and I disobeyed you because I told you I wasn't going to edit the birthdate templates no more but I am going to stick to that also I been making other unconstructive edits that do not improve the article I am editing such as changing Notes to References that is not helpful at all and does not correspond with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view as Notes and References are the same thing also I will not be overlinking articles no more because I read WP:OVERLINK and I now know what needs to be linked and what doesn't and I will also use an edit summary before I save an edit to an article so editors on Wikipedia will know what edits I made to the article. Lindenhurst Liberty (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That would be very helpful.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 00:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final note

At this point I no longer believe that you have any intention of listening to editors on your talk page with regard to your unnecessary null edits to articles. You have (twice now) stated unequivocally that you would not continue to make unnecessary edits to articles such as changing the case/number format of the birth date age templates and yet it continues unabated to this day. I don't know whether you simply don't care that your edits are unproductive and an irritant to many other users, or whether you are incapable of stopping yourself. Regardless, your continued disregard of the requests of others as well as your dishonesty reflects poorly on you with regard to your ability to edit collaboratively. I've given up in trying to explain these issues to you in hopes that your editing could be directing into a more productive area as you simply won't listen. That's unfortunate and I expect that it will ultimately lead to more exasperated talk page messages from frustrated editors and possibly sanctions; that is the Wikipedia path you have chosen for yourself. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood#8 children by 6 women. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weigh in at discussion?

Hi. Would you care to weigh in at this discussion. It concerns whether a reviewer's paraphrased criticism should be included/kept at a music article. Dan56 (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Gourami Watcher. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --GouramiWatcher^(?) 01:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lisa "Left Eye" Lopes.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Lisa "Left Eye" Lopes.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. January (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:CHERISH.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CHERISH.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miranda Cosgrove. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. You made two edits to this page. One was completely pointless (your ongoing changes of case within templates), the other was nonsensical. SummerPhD (talk) 23:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote (support/oppose) at my FA nomination for the article New York Dolls (album)? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 23:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ed Sheeran may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Avril Lavigne infobox picture

Pls. take part in the ongoing talk page thread on this, instead of undoing my edits without even an edit summary why. --Mareklug ^talk 09:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Katy Perry. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:12, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ed Sheeran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 goals for WikiProject NJ

Hey there, your feedback is welcome here. We are trying to get new users too. Tinton5 (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hey there! I noticed that you almost never include an edit summary for your edits. FWIW, per WP:FIES: "It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit". Please consider using them so it's easier for others to "decide whether it is worthwhile for them to review an edit". Thanks! Rationalobserver (talk) 22:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I second this request, especially since many of your edits have to be reverted for being incorrect. Please stop editing templates, please stop introducing grammatical errors, and please review WP:CAPTION before you change any more image captions. I see that as far back as October 2013, people such as Ponyo have been trying to get you to use edit summaries and stop changing templates. You promised to cooperate—what happened? --Laser brain (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck, gang. Note LL's replies in sections 18 and 21 above... Eric ^talk 00:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I really hope I'm wrong, but many of this user's edits could be described as subtle forms of vandalism. I apologize in advance if this assertion is inaccurate. Rationalobserver (talk) 00:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yolanda "La La" Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yolanda "La La" Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yolanda "La La" Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tupac Shakur 4.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tupac Shakur 4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 00:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tupac Shakur 4.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Tupac Shakur 4.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image resolution

Hi there. I'm curious why you reverted the bot here. Per WP:IMAGERES, non-free images should generally not exceed 0.1 megapixels. Your image was much too large, and the bot did what it was meant to do and resized it down to a lower resolution. Once reduced, the page is tagged so that the larger image is removed from the file history, leaving only the sized-down version. This is done whenever new versions of non-free files are uploaded. We do not retain the history, as the old versions of the files are technically orphaned. I've reverted back to the bot's version and again tagged the file as having orphaned non-free revisions. Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 19:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You been blocked for your long-term insignificant edits to birthdate templates as Ponyo had been discussing with you as early as 2013. There's also been numerous requests by others on your talk page to use edit summaries as well, which have gone unheeded Per Wikipedia:Civility, editors are expected to be cooperative and responsive.—Bagumba (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tupac June 1996.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tupac June 1996.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC) [reply]

January 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 02:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion though IP edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 07:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Floyd

Please see this discussion and the timeline is here. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 01:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to make this indefinite but you've shown absolutely no indication of acknowledging or understanding anything other editors have been communicating with you, or any intention of stopping the same behavior that's been causing problems going back to when you started editing. You'll have to communicate here and address community concerns before you will be allowed to edit again. --Laser brain (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's also the use of multiple accounts at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lindenhurst Liberty.—Bagumba (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lindenhurst Liberty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]