User talk:Mizzou1993

Mizzou1993, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mizzou1993! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mount Auburn Hospital

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Mount Auburn Hospital article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! : Noyster (talk), 07:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Taxation as theft has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Taxation as theft was changed by Mizzou1993 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966475 on 2015-08-07T15:31:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

If you have concerns about an article you have several options: (1) edit it yourself, explaining your changes in the edit summary or at greater length on the article's Talk page; (2) propose major changes on the Talk page, to seek other editors' opinions before making the changes; (3) if you consider that the whole article merits deletion, then open a deletion discussion as explained here. Don't ever just blank the article (except in cases of apparent copyright violation or defamation): Noyster (talk), 09:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add speculation to the United Airlines Flight 93 article. The material you added was not from The Times, but The Sunday Times which is a different publication - although owned by the same company; and was pure speculation. Wikipedia relies on confirmed facts and not speculative theories. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 09:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Racism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Racism was changed by Mizzou1993 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85283 on 2015-08-25T02:48:47+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Air France Flight 689

Hello, Mizzou1993. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Air France Flight 689, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. (aeropagitica) 07:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Air France Flight 689 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air France Flight 689 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 689 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MilborneOne (talk) 22:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Sources

Hi. Take a look at WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. You can always ask at WP:RSN. Doug Weller (talk) 21:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New York Mets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wornall Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brush Creek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Coolest Christmas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock and Roll Christmas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Coolest Christmas

The article The Coolest Christmas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Standard unspectacular Christmas compilation. No significant coverage, failing WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Coolest Christmas album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Coolest Christmas album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flint, Michigan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Wiae. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Arizona Cardinals— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wiae /tlk 02:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flint, Michigan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 04:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spencer^T♦C 05:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Sports in Philadelphia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sports in Philadelphia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! HGilbert (talk) 17:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism of United Airlines article

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United Airlines. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Darkest Tree Talk 18:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chicago Blackhawks, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  20:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Federal Communications Commission have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 06:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve C&R Market

Hi, I'm PamD. Mizzou1993, thanks for creating C&R Market!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Nothing in this article indicates that the chain is "Notable" in Wikipedia's terms. Please add some sources which are independent of the company. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

PamD 22:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of C&R Market

Hello, Mizzou1993. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, C&R Market, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

PamD 22:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Springs Aquatic Center Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Springs Aquatic Center Logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Springs Aquatic Center

Hello, Mizzou1993. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Springs Aquatic Center, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, I'm AmericanAir88. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Water park have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Springs Aquatic Center Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Springs Aquatic Center Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Pasley

The article John Pasley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Pasley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Pasley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ GB fan 14:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karen Pasley

The article Karen Pasley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC. Editors are not inherently notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 05:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AARoads

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AARoads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Actualcpscm (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Taxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxation

A tag has been placed on Taxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 22:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pluzzer and minuzzer

A tag has been placed on Pluzzer and minuzzer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 22:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Minuzzer

A tag has been placed on Minuzzer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 22:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pluzzer

A tag has been placed on Pluzzer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 22:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)