User talk:Nileena joseph

Archives
	Sorted by Category Welcome Messages; Messages from Users; Sorted by Date August 2006 to October 2006; Current Discussions;

Welcome!

Hello, Nileena joseph, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Survival Tips

Hi Nileena, I see that you had a user box saying that you wish to become an administrator one day. You may consider the following. The wikipedia community is a community of aspirants. So the competition is tough. If you want to become one you should consider these.

1. All the policies can be violated resorting to common sense. But remember that common sense is not common. So while using common sense, use the uncommon; the sense of big brothers.

2. In case you notice something against your common sense, as an aspirant, what you should do is to go on editing new articles. Never question the big brother. Aspirants should pretend not to have noticed anything.

3. Edit count is important. Go on editing. Best is one word during one edit. Many here consider editors with higher edit count superior.

4. Sock-puppets are Okay. But be careful that you are not voting against the big brothers. (If you had voted to delete S. Jithesh, no one would have bothered). Also take care that your language does not betray you.

5. Barn stars are not sufficient. Be specific while praising. Oh your edit here was fantastic, etc. It helps. After all who is here to help the African child?

Dakshayani 07:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Administrators' Noticeboard

Hi, Nileena. I had to revert an edit you made to the Administrators' Noticeboard. Your edit accidentally wiped out many comments from others. It seemed to return the article to a version of several days ago. I can only advise you to try adding the message again. Thanks, A ecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 20:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New contributions

You can announce new articles at it's new section on the India noticeboard. If they have an interesting fact, you can nomininate the article at WP:DYK and have them appear on the mainpage. -- Ganeshk (talk) 05:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

S. Jithesh

Hi! We've no doubt that S. Jithesh exists. The question is whether he is notable enough to deserve an article on Wikipedia.

If you feel that the S. Jithesh article passes WP:V and WP:BIO, I will suggest that you start writing the article in your user space: User:Nileena joseph/S. Jithesh. When the article becomes good enough to pass WP:V and WP:BIO, it can be moved to article namespace.

While creating the article, ask yourself following questions: Is he associated with notable publication? Have his cartoons caused a major impact? Have his cartoons caused a political controversy? Has he won some award? etc. And more importantly, is there any way in which others can verify answers to above questions. In my opinion, being part of an exhibition or appearing on a TV show doesn't make a person notable enough.

You can request unprotection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection.

Image:News cutting exhi new.jpg proves that there was an exhibition of cartoons/caricatures by S. Jithesh. But it doesn't indicate that he is notable in some way. I can't comment on Image:Malayalam- jeevithath..1.jpg or Image:News paper cutting desa.jpg though, as I don't understand Malayalam. I think you can discuss it with User:Deepujoseph, who is a Keralite. utcursch | talk 12:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:VS VALLIATHAN PIC3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VS VALLIATHAN PIC3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 23:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:News cutting exhi new.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:News cutting exhi new.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 23:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:News paper cutting desa.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:News paper cutting desa.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 23:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Malayalam- jeevithath..1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Malayalam- jeevithath..1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 23:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

S. Jithesh

Hi! I'm not prejudiced. I'm not saying that S. Jithesh doesn't exist or is not famous. The issue is that the article fails WP:V.

Try to look at this issue from others' point of view. Suppose, there is a painter whose works has been displayed in four or five exhibitions. A news article has appeared in two or three newspapers about the exhibition with his photograph. His paintings have been published in a local magazine. Now suppose today a user writes an article about this person on Wikipedia. Should we accept the article? Is this person notable enough to deserve an article in an encyclopedia? There are hundreds of exhibitions organized all over the world everyday. There are thousands of artists, whose work is displayed at these exhibitions. Newspapers publish articles about these exhibitions.

The author of the article says that the painter has not received wide media coverage, because his paintings are controversial. How can we believe it? No! Wikipedia will be full of non-notable biographies, if we allow this. There has to be some evidence. See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence: "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material."

We're not being anti-S.Jithesh or anti-Nileena here. We value your contributions very much. Probably you've read my and others' comments at User talk:Srikeit. We have no doubt about you being a genuine user (and not a sockpuppet) and we agree that you've made good contributions to Malayalam-related articles. We just want the article to pass WP:V. Any article that is not verifiable is deleted. This is an official Wikipedia policy, and not our (my/Tintin's/Srikeit's/others') opinion.

If S. Jithesh is indeed notable, some evidence of him being notable should be provided. That's why I suggested that you start writing the article at User:Nileena joseph/S. Jithesh and keep adding the references as you find them. When the article passes WP:V, it can be moved to article space.

If you still feel that I am prejudiced, you can request unprotection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. utcursch | talk 11:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Sean gorter/Signature shop

Title says all. ~~•S e an•gorter•^{(T) (P)} 13:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks..... Nileena joseph ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 15:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Very thanks Nileena for wishes. If I am somehow able to help out in some admin work, then please let me know. Regards, Shyam ^(T/C) 09:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Thank you for your kind words on my userpage. I am very humbled that you feel this way. I have worked very hard on it, and it feels good to be appreciated of it. If you every need me please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers!--^ॐ S e adog ^ॐ 18:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Madhumita datta AfD

I agree with you about "weak delete", but I think the Google link you've cited is the wrong person. It looks like it's the woman who's a Delhi-based environmental activist, and not the Kolkata journalist. I also left a message for the journalist User:Madhumitadatta on her talk page but she hasn't come back yet. --Mereda 08:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google test fallibility

I've always held the view that search engines are not really benchmarks for notability when it comes to encyclopaedias. Because, a phenomenon or an entity, however underreported in the web or elsewhere does not become intrinsically uninteresting for an encyclopaedia. Over and above this, there's this language bias in a google test and this has been already acknowledged at Google_test#Google_bias. There's nothing that stops one from citing a reputed source like Malayala Manorama. Having said that, I feel that the entity becomes notable if it's unique or very different from other members of its class. This holds good if (when the entity is a living being) it has achieved a rare feat or is clearly distinguishable from the general population. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 06:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:News_cutting_exhi_new.jpg

Yes it is orphaned, per WP:FAIR. Please read again about uploading images under fair use. Read criterion #9:

Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are not covered under the fair use doctrine.

I've reverted back the image, unless you used it in the article namespace. — Indon (reply) — 15:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. The rule for fair use images is very strict. Why don't use use external links to the image? — Indon (reply) — 16:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then there's now way to show it, unless it is a free image. — Indon (reply) — 16:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

That article was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Jithesh. Please go to deletion review if you wish to contest the deletion. -- Steel 17:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well tell that to deletion review. -- Steel 17:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala wikipedians are discussing this matter in the tak page Talk:S. Jithesh of the deleted article. The administrator deleted this page without considering the opinion of native wikipedians. He was prejudiced. I consider it as an example of administrators abuse of power. Nileena joseph ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 04:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Hiya, to answer your question, I think that the page that you want is WP:RFCU. --Elonka 20:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I almost never vote delete on an India related AfD unless notability is absolutely impossible to establish. I'm quite aware the the Manorama is widely read (especially among overseas Malayali). I also generally ask ppl from the respective state for their input on afd's.Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent request for Checkuser

You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. For an outcome to be achieved, we require you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the requests for checkuser page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. Also, a checkuser has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 05:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC), checkuser clerk.[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for the Support

I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, Nileea joseph, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, M a rtinp23 14:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for your support!

A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. Thanks again! ReyBrujo 20:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent contributions

Hello Nileena. I really do appreciate the pains you are taking to add Kerala journalism related articles to wikipedia. However please be careful that for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--thunderboltz ^(Deepu) 07:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Image

Hi, just looking through your userpage and I saw that you had a userbox which said that you had taken a featured image. But going through your image contributions, I saw that none of your images have achieved Featured status. As such, could you remove that userbox. Thanks. --Agεθ020 (ΔT • ФC) 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mannaraprayil_Cor-Episcopa

Have any newspaper articles or something to back notability?Bakaman _Bakatalk 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, well maybe you should go to malayalam wiki, create the sourced pages, then create them on english wiki after they are on Malayalam wiki.Bakaman _Bakatalk 17:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or make a page called "User:Nileena joseph/Sandbox", create the article in your sandbox, and then when it looks good and sourced, move it into article space.Bakaman _Bakatalk 17:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reg: Ayyappappanikker

Hi Nileena, You can find more information about Ayyappappanikker here.

http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%85%E0%B4%AF%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%AF%E0%B4%AA%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%AA%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%A3%E0%B4%BF%E0%B4%95%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%95%E0%B4%B0%E0%B5%8D%E2%80%8D

Hope this helps in expanding the article (I am too lazy to do it myself :-) )

And here is an article on Kunjunni Mash also

http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%95%E0%B5%81%E0%B4%9E%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%9E%E0%B5%81%E0%B4%A3%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%A3%E0%B4%BF%E0%B4%AE%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%B7%E0%B5%8D

Simynazareth 15:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)simynazareth[reply]

Reg: T Padmanabhan

Hi Nileena,

I just added some more information on the page for T. Padmanabhan (Writer). I would love to keep contributing, but as of now, my priority is to get Malayalam Wikipedia to a snowballing level.

I translated the article to malayalam wiki ([1]). I also Started translating few of your articles already to Malayalam wiki :-) (M.V. Devan) Keep up the good work!

Please find more information about me at [2]

By the way, the statue of mother and child (Ammayum Kunjum) at Kollam Nehru Park is created by Artist M.V. Devan. Also, he is the chairman of Malayala Kalagramam in Kannur. (http://www.malayalakalagramam.com/graphic.html)

Simynazareth 17:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)simynazareth[reply]

s jithesh and stuff

Please take a look at WP:CITE . There is a way for you to use Malayali newspapers (in addition to mainstream papers) to assert notability.Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said earlier[3], I've no doubt that S. Jithesh exists. The question is whether he is notable enough to deserve an article on Wikipedia. In what way The Hindu links prove his notability? One report says that he addressed a gathering along with District Information Officer, Deputy District Medical Officer, Assistant Information Officer. The other says that he contributed to a booklet, along with many other cartoonists. Like I earlier suggested (and Bakasuprman has suggested above), you can start writing the article at User:Nileena joseph/S. Jithesh. I'm not convinced of his notability, but I'll help with formatting and copyediting, if required. When the article becomes good enough to pass WP:V and WP:BIO, it can be moved to article namespace. If you feel I'm being unreasonable or prejudiced, you can always request unprotection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. utcursch | talk 04:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that we cannot rely on Google or English newspapers to establish notability or non-notability of a person. But WP:V and WP:BIO are fair policies. If I write an article on XYZ today, saying that XYZ is highly notable in some part of the world where English is not spoken, should others believe me blindly? No! The Hindu (and other) links mention Mannaraprayil_Cor-Episcopa and S. Jithesh, but they do not prove that the subjects are notable enough to deserve an article on Wikipedia. If these are indeed notable in Kerala, why do majority of the Keralite Wikipedians say otherwise? If enough established users say that the subject is notable, articles are not deleted. See for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billoo. Anyway, I've restored the deleted content to your subpage: User:Nileena joseph/S. Jithesh and User:Nileena joseph/Mannaraprayil Cor-Episcopa. I'll be happy to help with copyediting/formatting work. utcursch | talk 09:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support

I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your (strong) confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 00:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishing for pike

Could you clarify why you chose delete instead of Transwikification? The transwikification won't have any ill effects on the quality of the pike article and still removes the material from Wikipedia while putting it where it belongs (on WikiBooks). - Mgm|^(talk) 11:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award for you

		The India Star
		I Arjun award you Nileena joseph the India Star. I award you this for all your great articles you have created concerning Indian topics. You work is highly appreciated and will not go unnoticed any longer. Keep up the great work my friend. ~ Arjun 03:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously great work, I love that you work quietly yet greatly for wikipedia. Cheers! ~ Arjun 03:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outstanding work

I am a wikipedian from Kerala. My work too has largely been confined to Kerala and India.Nice to see your work. sumal 13:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Jithu cari.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Jithu cari.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Jithu cari.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Jithu cari.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see a wikipedian

finally I managed to find a wikipedian with some admin powers... good ... Hope you ll clear If I have any issues or doubts in posting in Wiki... Regards, Anand.S

Your e-mail address

It may not be wise to put your e-mail address on your user page and wikipedia doesn’t encourage doing so. Therefore, I have edited your user profile. Hope you like it. You may also check: WP:EMAIL --Avinesh Jose 09:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arakkal Museum

Hi, take a look at the article on Arakkal Museum. Shijaz 05:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VS VALLIATHAN new.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VS VALLIATHAN new.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of category from your userpage

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Indulekha.com

I have nominated Indulekha.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indulekha.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ChiragPatnaik (talk) 05:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ninan Koshy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ninan Koshy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninan Koshy. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ==

--Googlean (talk) 11:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mayilamma

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mayilamma, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayilamma. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ==

Googlean (talk) 11:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malayalam literature

Nileena, I guess the above mentioned article needs a serious cleanup. Has a bit of COI edits going on there. Also, Ml wikipedia has decided to delete Thomas Kuzhinapurath on notability grounds. please see ml:സംവാദം:തോമസ് കുഴിനാപ്പുറത്ത്. Just FYI. --Jyothis (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Indian Barnstar of National Merit

		The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
		I hereby award Nileena joseph for her contributions to India content in WP and to assure that her contributions havent gone unnoticed.Keep up the good work ! -- *Tinu* *Cherian* - 04:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Nileena joseph. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Article Rescue Members are not necessarily inclusionists, all wikipedians are warmly welcome to join.~~~~

Malayalam literature

Hi, I am addressing this to you, because I saw your name constantly appearing in the talk page of this article. Quality-wise the article is disastrous; it is basically nothing more than a list of names. Literature is not exactly my field of interest, but its shameful to leave such an important article like that. On a sharp contrast, see the kind of work gone into Tamil literature. Let's spend some time and improve it. You must be knowing, if the article is of one's area of interest, writing for long becomes less tedious. I am always wlling to help, and let me know what you think.--Anoopkn (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Santhigiri

I have nominated Santhigiri, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhigiri. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neon Merlin 18:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Karunakara Guru

I have nominated Karunakara Guru, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karunakara Guru (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neon Merlin 18:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Nileena joseph! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 691 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

K. N. Panikkar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Brittas for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article John Brittas, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Brittas until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pharis Aboobaker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pharis Aboobaker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fæ (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D. Vinayachandran for deletion

The article D. Vinayachandran is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Vinayachandran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...Captain......Tälk tö me... 08:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D. Vinayachandran for deletion

The article D. Vinayachandran is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Vinayachandran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exbit on chikun guniya.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Exbit on chikun guniya.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 03:25, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Nileena joseph,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Nileena joseph! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Speedy deletion nomination of Venu Nair

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Venu Nair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §everal⇒|Times 17:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

K. A. Francis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Painter

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paris Viswanathan

The article Paris Viswanathan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. If you can find reliable sources, you can remove this tag and avert deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stedrick (talk) 19:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C. J. Kuttappan

The article C. J. Kuttappan has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 03:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Bose Krishnamachari, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Painter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Caricature, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indian and Thing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kattoor Narayana Pillai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kattoor Narayana Pillai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kattoor Narayana Pillai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AKS (talk) 06:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Rahul Easwar

An article you have contributed is nominated for deletion. Rahul Easwar. Pls participate in the deletion discussion. Wikieditindia (talk) 11:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Nileena joseph! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Nileena joseph! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kantararu Maheshwararu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kantararu Maheshwararu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kantararu Maheshwararu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 05:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nileena Joseph

I hope you could help me in editing and repairing pages of towns in Alapuzha and Pathanamthitta.It just about tidying up and adding more info to the pages.Thanks Kayamlulam-Punalur(Prof. Thomas P.K) Kayamkulam-Punalur (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Nileena joseph,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nileena joseph. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cinema Mangalam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cinema Mangalam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema Mangalam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Venu Nair

Hello, Nileena joseph. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Venu Nair, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Venu Nair

Hello, Nileena joseph. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Venu Nair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]