User talk:STEF1995S

Welcome!

Hello, STEF1995S, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like List of H2O: Just Add Water characters, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 00:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of H2O: Just Add Water characters

The article List of H2O: Just Add Water characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary fork from main article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 00:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of schools in Romania

The article List of schools in Romania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Utterly unmanageable... and even if it was, we're not a directory

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NVO (talk) 20:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wizards of Hannah Montana with H2O: Just Add JONAS

A tag has been placed on Wizards of Hannah Montana with H2O: Just Add JONAS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cargoking talk 15:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Wizards on Deck with Hannah Montana. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 15:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Scooby-Doo episodes

The article List of Scooby-Doo episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

exact copy from List of Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! episodes among others. unnecessary duplication of content with no required GFDL attribution links to the wiki article(s) created from.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NrDg 15:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wizards of Hannah Montana with H2O: Just Add JONAS

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wizards of Hannah Montana with H2O: Just Add JONAS, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NrDg 16:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did in the article Wizards of Hannah Montana with H2O: Just Add JONAS. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. NrDg 16:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Disney Universe

A tag has been placed on Template:Disney Universe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. NrDg 16:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ştefan Alexandrescu

A tag has been placed on Ştefan Alexandrescu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Calaka (talk) 11:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:STEF1995S.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:STEF1995S.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Avril Lavigne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. HamburgerRadio (talk) 19:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Kerαunoςcopia 23:14, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. JBsupreme (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 20:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hannah Montana discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Hannah Montana: The Movie (soundtrack)‎, you will be blocked from editing.

If You Feel My Love (album)

I have fixed typos in the title of this article. If it's to stay, you need to provide references to show that it is notable - see WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Hannah Montana 4

I have nominated Hannah Montana 4, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Montana 4. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of If You Feel My Love (album)

The article If You Feel My Love (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was created my a known sockpuppet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 117Avenue (talk) 06:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannah Montana 4.Jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hannah Montana 4.Jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of If You Feel My Love (album)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is If You Feel My Love (album). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If You Feel My Love (album). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 3). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 3). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see Talk:Hannah Montana (season 3)#In My Veins I Live In Hannah Montana for further information. AussieLegend (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 3). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 13:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dream, Dream, Dream and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Dream, Dream, Dream, Wake Up America (song). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream, Dream, Dream for Dream, Dream, Dream, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wake Up America (song) for Wake Up America (song). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Last Song (soundtrack)

The article The Last Song (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NALBUM, "Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release." I wasn't able to verify the name or track list of the soundtrack, so I don't believe there is enough information for an article at this time. See also: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liquidluck✽talk 23:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Save_The_World_2010.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Save_The_World_2010.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chart trajectories

Per WP:Record charts, chart trajectories should not be included in Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 18:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian Top 100

Hello! I have noticed you've updated the page for the Romanian Singles Chart number ones page, but none of the 3 sources hasn't updated the chart since week 3. I would like you to provide a source for that, or your contributions will be reverted. Thank you. Alecsdaniel (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cred ca pozitiile se referau la topul Fresh Top 40 mai mult, decat la Romanian Top 100. Alecsdaniel (talk) 18:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am vazut si eu topul pe Kiss :-D ms pt pont. BTW, acuma de unde ai mai facut update-ul? :))

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not include the Bulgarian Singles Chart from acharts.us, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, in any Wikipedia articles. There is a valid Bulgarian chart listed at http://www.bamp-bg.org/en/2009-07-08-09-48-53/nmc-charts.html if you want to see if Déjà Vu charted on the official chart.—Kww(talk) 00:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:DejaVuVideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DejaVuVideo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 07:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paula and Ovi Romania.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paula and Ovi Romania.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hot Live.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hot Live.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This image was already on Wikimedia Commons at File:Inna-sopot.jpg. I updated the article to use that one as it was reviewed. There's no need to reupload images from Commons here. They can be used just as if they were already on Wikipedia. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Avertizare

Te rog nu mai umbla pe la RT100, e clar ca faci mai mult rau decat bine. Opreste-te sau te reclam pentru vandalism repetat. Alecsdaniel (talk) 14:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] incheierea discutiei. Alecsdaniel (talk) 19:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replica mi-e sa te uiti sa vezi ca nu e doar pe zile, ci la sfarsitul fiecarei saptamani se calculeaza totalul, da cateva clickuri si vezi. Alecsdaniel (talk) 19:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia merge dupa posibilitatea de a fi verificate informatiile. Topul prezentat de Kiss in niciun caz nu poate fi verificat, nu putem fi crezuti pe cuvant. Si cei de la Kiss tot se lauda ca topul e facut de media forest si uite ce diferenta. Logic ca tot site-ul media forest are mai multa credibilitate. Alecsdaniel (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blah blah blah

Am văzut fără să vreau discuţia ta cu Alecsdaniel şi am o întrebare: prin ce referinţe susţii faza cu "Morning After Dark"? (Având în vedere că Morena a fost #1 - per [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], în lipsa a ceva mai bun); Nimeni nu a scris că Morning... este/a fost #1. Lucian C. (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Atunci arată sursa conform căreia Morning este/a fost #1. Lucian C. (talk) 09:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TelephoneBritAwards.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TelephoneBritAwards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian Top

E ilogic ca topul romanesc sa fie la fel ca cel din Bulgaria. Nu se poate ca o melodie romaneasca sa fie ascultata in acelasi timp si acolo, la fel cum nu se asculta muzica bulgareasca in Romania, ceea ce inseamna ca in acel top ar fi doar melodii straine si atunci topul nu este corect realizat. Pentru topul corect Airplay Romania, puteti consulta site-ul bestmusic.ro la capitolul stiri. Odata pe saptamana este publicat un articol cu privire la primele 10 melodii din Romanian Chart, furnizat de Nielsen Music. Din pacate, en.wiki are site-ul bestmusic pe lista celor spam (nu stiu de ce). Eddie Nixon (talk) 22:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ori matematica mea este proasta, ori datele adunate in mediaforest nu duc la acelasi rezultat ca la nielsen. Am adunat numerele din mediaforest pentru ultima saptamana publicata pe upfr.ro si topurile nu coincid. Asadar, solutia propusa de dv. nu este cea corecta, iar topul romanesc ramane cel furnizat de Nielsen si publicat pe bestmusic.ro in fiecare saptamana (si pe alte site-uri precum antena1.ro), sau din cand in cand pe upfr.ro. Eddie Nixon (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Butterflyflyawaycover.png

Thank you for uploading File:Butterflyflyawaycover.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:RedandBlueEPCover2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:RedandBlueEPCover2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RT100

Acum de unde mai faci update? Alecsdaniel (talk) 18:29, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charly1300

WP:CHARTS. Site-ul nu este permis ca si sursa, deci orice referinta care duce catre site va fi scoasa mai devreme sau mai tarziu. Alecsdaniel (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Time of Our Lives (Miley Cyrus song)

I have nominated The Time of Our Lives (Miley Cyrus song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Time of Our Lives (Miley Cyrus song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –Chase (talk) 23:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problema ta

Am observat în ultima vreme că tot faci update-uri la RT100 şi am mai avut discuţia asta. Atâta timp cât nu ai surse valide, în care să fie scris negru pe alb că o "X" melodie este pe nu ştiu ce poziţie, nu poţi introduce aşa ceva în articol. Faci update din capul tău câteodată, am impresia, unde scrie că Gypsy a fost #1 în România? Induci în eroare cititorii şi introduci afirmaţii false în articole (lucru care se numeşte calomnie). Situaţia cu RT este foarte dificilă şi tu nu faci decât să înrăutăţeşti toată situaţia. Dacă nu acţionezi cum ţi-am recomandat (folosirea strictă a surselor de încredere - scris negru pe alb, nu "am auzit la kiss tv/fm" sau "am citit in bravo") o să cer blocarea ta. (Pont - dacă nu ai cu ce să faci update, nu faci) — Lucian C. (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Es wäre schlimm wenn jeder sich einfach anders ausdrucken würde, oder? Sí, sí, es la verdad. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 12:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Hips Don't Lie. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Europe22 (talk) 20:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Big Time Vandalism

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lucian C. (talk) 21:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you respond to the concerns raised there. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 13:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of number-one hits of 2010 (Romania), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Since you did not respond @ ANI, I am now watching your contributions. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 16:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Romanian Airplay Chart

The article Romanian Airplay Chart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Possible Hoax; see ANI thread

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 16:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of most played artists of 2010 (Romania)

The article List of most played artists of 2010 (Romania) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I Want U to Want Me

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on I Want U to Want Me requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Top Jim (talk) 15:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BADCHARTS

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sun Is Up, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been warned numerous times about WP:BADCHARTS. You have been specifically warned about the Bulgarian chart at acharts.us. You have been specifically warned about charly1300.com. You must stop adding these charts to articles.—Kww(talk) 20:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tophit.ru

Tophit.ru is on WP:BADCHARTS. Please don't add it to articles.—Kww(talk) 18:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for addition of charts from WP:BADCHARTS after final warning. I didn't notice that you were on final warning when I left the above notice, so I'm carrying it out. You are blocked until you agree to consult WP:BADCHARTS prior to adding charts to articles. Any admin can lift this block when that condition is met.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 19:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dear Mama Video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dear Mama Video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 16:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:DejaVuCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DejaVuCover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Innadejavu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Innadejavu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Déjà Vu (Inna song)

A tag has been placed on Déjà Vu (Inna song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Bob Taylor has absolutely no article, he is the lead artist of the song, so this means non-notable music

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ian Streeter (talk) 14:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Playingwithfire Live.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Playingwithfire Live.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of channels on RCS&RDS for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of channels on RCS&RDS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of channels on RCS&RDS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bazonka (talk) 19:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - June 2012

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the blue bar.

This Newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. [reply]

Project Eurovision RFC discussion reminder

WikiProject Eurovision: This is a reminder to all members of Project Eurovision, that there is still an ongoing RfC discussion taking place at the project talk page. It is vital that everyone participates in this discussion, as it concerns the future manual of style and article layout in regards to Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year articles. This is your ideal opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas on a major issue, which will reflect on the way these articles will be written in future. Thank You! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:13, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - July 2012

Your monthly WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter has arrived. To open click "show".

EUROISION

• WikiProject News •

Issue #20 • July 2012

Home • Talk • Portal • Newsdesk • Archives

Message from the Editorial Team

Bienvenue! Willkommen! Welcome!

Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project. It is easy for editors to get into conflict with each other, and things can get very nasty on the most trivial of issues, whether that be on the language of songs, the names of certain countries, or how we deal with incidents at the contest. In such circumstances it is worth remembering one thing: we are all here to build an encyclopedia, and the contribution of Eurovision to human knowledge can only be given justice if we work together and make articles, not drama!

If you would like something to appear in the August 2012 Edition of the newsletter, then please inform us at the Project Newsdesk.
If there is an article you think we should have? Request it here.

Happy editing!

Project News

When creating new articles about a performer or song, please remember to add sources either from Eurovision.tv, ESCToday or other reliable sources. If you're not sure a source is reliable enough, then ask the project for an opinion.
Remember to only add content to articles that is relevant to the article's main subject. Anything not in relation to the article may be questioned and/or subject to redirection to an article that would benefit it's inclusion. Again if in doubt, ask on the article or project talk pages for an opinion - communication is an important tool.
On the subject of communication, please make use of the article talk pages. They are a vital tool in conducting consensus talks of additions of proposed new sections and/or removal of unnecessary section. If you don't use these pages to put across your views, then you only have yourself to blame if actions are taken that you disagree with and you end up wandering into edit warring territory.
The 2012 season of Eurovision has drawn to a close, and we now start preparations for the 2013 edition. While things will be slow to start of with, now is the ideal opportunity to do a clean-up exercise across articles relating to the project. There's over 4,500 articles associated with the project. If you happen to see a Eurovision related article without the {{EurovisionNotice}} template on the article's talk page, please add it. You can also read Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment if you would like to help assess or reassess articles in our project if you see that they have outgrown their current assessment. There is currently one unassessed article.
And finally... a massive thank you to all members of the project for your constant hard work on collaborating and contributing to Eurovision related articles. Keep up the good work team!

Project Alerts

Please remember to keep checking the project articles that have been flagged up as an alert. Since our last publication the following alerts have flagged up:
- good article nominees - Eurovision Song Contest 2012
- requests for comment - Blue and Project Eurovision

Headlines
Project Gossip

The RfC discussion in regards to article layout, is still taking place on the project talk page. Could all members please ensure that they participate in the discussion so that we can all agree on important article structure issues. If you don't take part, then you only have yourselves to blame if a consensus is passed that you disagree with.

Page Milestones

List of Eurovision Song Contest winners on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on 28 May 2012.
Eurovision Song Contest 2012 has been nominated for a Good Article review on 15 June 2012.

Eurovision Song Contest - Sweden 2013

So far 20 countries have confirmed participation for the Eurovision Song Contest 2013, which is scheduled to take place in Sweden. Please remember to only cite reliable sources when adding countries to the article.
The host city for Eurovision Song Contest 2013 has still not been announced. Gothenburg, Malmö, and Stockholm are among the candidate cities so far.

Junior Eurovision Song Contest - Netherlands 2012

The tenth edition of the Junior Eurovision Song Contest is scheduled to take place on the 1 December 2012, in Amsterdam, Netherlands. Details about confirmed participation are slowly filtering out into the world wide web. Please cite reliable sources when including new information.
The EBU extended the submission deadline to 29 June 2012. So far only 8 countries confirmed participations, and the contest needs a minimum of eleven in order for the show to continue. Bulgaria have withdrawn.

Asiavision Song Contest - South Korea 2012

After several postponements, the first contest is now scheduled to take place in the South Korean capital of Seoul; on 14 October 2012.
Could all members please find any reliable sources on participants etc, so that we can consider creating an article for this event.

Eurovision Young Musicians - Austria 2012

On 11 May 2012, Norwegian, Eivind Holtsmark Ringstad, won the 16th Eurovision Young Musicians 2012, in Vienna, Austria. This is a biennial event, and the next contest will take place in 2014, with Vienna most likely to be the host nation for a fifth consecutive time.

Eurovision Young Dancers - Norway 2011

The next contest is scheduled to take place in 2013 - the host city is expected to be announced towards the end of 2012.

Eurovision Dance Contest - United Kingdom 2008

Glasgow were the hosts of the Eurovision Dance Contest 2008, and since then there have been no announcements of the contest continuing with a third edition.

Members
The project had 90 members, with eighty-six active, and four inactive members at the time of publication. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list
Have you encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project..

New Recruits

We would like to welcome the following new members who joined since our June publication. (in alphabetical order)

Adieu! Auf Wiedersehen! Farewell!

We would like to bid farewell and show our appreciation to the following members who have decided to depart the project for personal reasons since our June publication. (in alphabetical order)

NovaSkola (talk · contribs)

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - August 2012

Your monthly WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter has arrived. To open click "show".

EUROISION

WikiProject Newsletter - August 2012

HOME • TALK • PORTAL • NEWSDESK • ARCHIVES

Message from the Editorial Team

Bienvenue! Willkommen! Welcome!

Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project.

The past month has been an eventful one for the project as a whole. Old dramas have closed, new ones have begun. Four articles nominated for GA review, three of them passed and promoted, with one of them making ProjectEurovision history by being the first annual contest article to ever achieve GA status. If it wasn't for the hard work and the many hours of team collaborations that we have endured on this project, then those accolades would never have been gained. Each of those article promotions are as a result of your continuous determination to be part of the best team this project has seen for a long time. There is a teamwork barnstar with this newsletter for you to cherish and you may display the award on your pages if you wish. Now we look to the months ahead and start preparations for Malmo 2013, and see if we can work to getting another annual article to GA status. Here's to you - the team of excellence.

If you would like something to appear in the September 2012 Edition of the newsletter, then please inform us at the Project Newsdesk.
If there is an article you think we should have? Request it here.
And finally... a massive thank you to all members of the project for your constant hard work on collaborating and contributing to Eurovision related articles. Keep up the good work team!

Happy editing!

Headlines
Page Milestones

Malmö Arena was promoted to GA status on 15 July 2012
Eurovision Song Contest 2012 was promoted to GA status on 16 July 2012
Lena Meyer-Landrut was promoted to GA status on 22 July 2012

Project Alerts

Please remember to keep checking the project articles that have been flagged up as an alert. Since our last publication the following alerts have flagged up:

Anggun is currently a GA nominee as of 19 July 2012.

Eurovision Song Contest - MALMÖ 2013

File:Eurovision Song Contest 2013.svg

So far 21 countries have confirmed participation for the Eurovision Song Contest 2013, which is scheduled to take place in Sweden. Please remember to only cite reliable sources when adding countries to the article.
On 8 July 2012 Malmö Arena in the city of Malmö was confirmed as the host venue for Eurovision Song Contest 2013.

Junior Eurovision Song Contest - AMSTERDAM 2012

The tenth edition of the Junior Eurovision Song Contest is scheduled to take place on the 1 December 2012, in Amsterdam, Netherlands. Details about confirmed participation are slowly filtering out into the world wide web. Please cite reliable sources when including new information.
Israel announced on 10 July 2012 that they will make their début in Amsterdam. Thus bringing the total number of confirmed participant to 9 countries so far. The contest needs a minimum of eleven in order for the show to continue. The EBU had extended the submission deadline to 29 June 2012, although no further details in regards to the contest has been released.

Asiavision Song Contest - SEOUL 2012

File:Our Sound - The Asia-Pacific Song Contest logo.svg

After several postponements, the first contest is now scheduled to take place in the South Korean capital of Seoul; on 14 October 2012.
Could all members please find any reliable sources on participants etc, so that we can consider creating an article for this event.

Eurovision Young Musicians - VIENNA 2012

On 11 May 2012, Norwegian, Eivind Holtsmark Ringstad, won the 16th Eurovision Young Musicians 2012, in Vienna, Austria. This is a biennial event, and the next contest will take place in 2014, with Vienna most likely to be the host nation for a fifth consecutive time.

Eurovision Young Dancers - OSLO 2011

The next contest is scheduled to take place in 2013 - the host city is expected to be announced towards the end of 2012.

Eurovision Dance Contest - GLASGOW 2008

Glasgow were the hosts of the Eurovision Dance Contest 2008, and since then there have been no announcements of the contest continuing with a third edition.

Project Gossip

The RfC discussion in regards to article layout, is still taking place on the project talk page. Could all members please ensure that they participate in the discussion so that we can all agree on important article structure issues. If you don't take part, then you only have yourselves to blame if a consensus is passed that you disagree with.

Project News

Project 1 - Contest by year and contest related pages involves:

A page for each year's contest
Improving/maintaining all the contest related pages in the project.

Project 2 - Contestants and songs involves:

Creating a page for each contestant and song involved in the contest.

Project 3 - "Country" in the contest involves:

Creating a page for each participating country in the contest. This will give information about a country's efforts and achievements in Eurovision.

Project 4 - "Country" in the contest "year" involves:

Creating a page for each country participating in the contest each year. This will give information about the year in Eurovision for that country, like how the song was chosen (selection events), how well it did, any other information about its participation that year.

Project 5 - Sourcing involves:

On Wikipedia, it is very important not only to have the correct information, but to show where you got it from so it can be verified. Editor's should be finding additional sources to reference information with.
This project also includes checking all similar pages to make sure things are consistent across the board and correcting any errors. A listing of pages marked for some sort of cleanup is available here.
When creating new articles about a performer or song, please remember to add sources either from Eurovision.tv, ESCToday or other reliable sources. If you're not sure a source is reliable enough, then ask others members of the project.

Project 6 – Assessment involves:

Assessing project pages. The first thing to do to assess an article is to add {{EurovisionNotice}}, the project banner, to the talk page of an article if it does not have one. If an article already has a banner, you should assess the article using the assessment scale. Assessing articles gives us a good idea about the quality of the articles in our project and can help identify short comings.

Communication involves:

Remember to only add content to articles that is relevant to the article's main subject. Anything not in relation to the article may be questioned and/or subject to redirection to an article that would benefit it's inclusion. Again if in doubt, ask on the article or project talk pages for an opinion - communication is an important tool.

On the subject of communication, please make use of the article talk pages. They are a vital tool in conducting consensus talks of additions of proposed new sections and/or removal of unnecessary section. If you don't use these pages to put across your views, then you only have yourself to blame if actions are taken that you disagree with and you end up wandering into edit warring territory.

Members
The project had 92 members, with eighty-eight active, and four inactive members at the time of publication. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list
Have you encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project..

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to every member of Project Eurovision for their contributions as a team towards Eurovision Song Contest 2012 article, which as a result gained the project its first Eurovision by Year article a GA Status. Thank you! - WP:ESC

New Recruits

We would like to welcome the following new members who joined since our July publication.

This newsletter was delivered on 19:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision: Recent changes

Hello,

Please note that there have been some changes to operations surrounding Eurovision articles, these being that:

Template names have now been modernised and/or megred into super-templates, for example Countries in the Eurovision Song Contest has now been merged into Template:Eurovision Song Contest making it even easier to find everything under one template. If you are planning to create a new template, please keep the standardised titles in mind. Other templates have been modernised and a full list of them can be found here.
The Eurovision Song Contest and Junior Eurovision Song Contest articles have now been standardised to keep a consitancy throughout the project and to the genral reader too. Skeleton article drafts can be found for Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year.

If you have any questions, please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Eurovision[reply]

WP:Eurovision Newsletter (September 2012)

Your monthly WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter has arrived. To open click "show".

EUROISION

Issue: XXII

HOME • TALK • PORTAL • NEWSDESK • ARCHIVES

Message from the Editorial Team

Bienvenue! Willkommen! Welcome!

Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project. Remember that this project can only operate if we act in a cooperative manner and engage in discussions regarding article matters. It is seen as best practice to put forward ideas to other members of the project before rushing ahead and acting on a potential falsifying action. If you feel an article may warrant a deletion, why not test the waters by opening a discussion on the article's talk page or our very own project talk page - before rushing off and submitting an AfD. It saves wasting time nominating an article for deletion which could end up with an overwhelming "keep" by other editors. Communicating with each other is a vital tool and a skill that may prove advantageous in real-life scenarios.

Also be on the look out for potential new members to the project. Post {{subst:EurovisionInvite}} (which will produced this template) on any user page you think is interested to join the WikiProject, to officially invite them to join.

If you would like something to appear in the October 2012 Edition of the newsletter, then please inform us at the Project Newsdesk.
If there is an article you think we should have? Request it here.
And finally... a massive thank you to all members of the project for your constant hard work on collaborating and contributing to Eurovision related articles. Keep up the good work team!

Happy editing!

Headlines
Page Milestones

No new milestones to report this month.

Project Alerts

Please remember to keep checking the project articles that have been flagged up as an alert. Since our last publication the following alerts have flagged up:

Anggun is currently a GA nominee as of 19 July 2012.
Requests for Comment at WP:ESC on 13 August 2012. (see discussion)
Requested moves for Havana Brown (DJ) on 25 August 2012. (see discussion)

Project Gossip

The RfC discussion in regards to article layout has now closed. Visit here to read the concluding report. A new discussion is taking place regarding a proposal on Project Reform. You contributions in the discussion are vital.

Eurovision Young Musicians - VIENNA 2012

On 11 May 2012, Norwegian, Eivind Holtsmark Ringstad, won the 16th Eurovision Young Musicians 2012, in Vienna, Austria. This is a biennial event, and the next contest will take place in 2014, with Vienna most likely to be the host nation for a fifth consecutive time.

Eurovision Young Dancers - OSLO 2011

The next contest is scheduled to take place in 2013 - the host city is expected to be announced towards the end of 2012.

Eurovision Dance Contest - GLASGOW 2008

Glasgow were the hosts of the Eurovision Dance Contest 2008, and since then there have been no announcements of the contest continuing with a third edition.

Eurovision Song Contest - MALMÖ 2013

So far 25 countries have confirmed participation for the Eurovision Song Contest 2013, which is scheduled to take place in Sweden. Please remember to only cite reliable sources when adding countries to the article.

Junior Eurovision Song Contest - AMSTERDAM 2012

The tenth edition of the Junior Eurovision Song Contest is scheduled to take place on the 1 December 2012, in Amsterdam, Netherlands. Details about confirmed participation are slowly filtering out into the world wide web. Please cite reliable sources when including new information.
Albania announced on 25 July 2012 that they will make their début in Amsterdam, and Moldova confirmed their participation. Thus bringing the total number of confirmed participant to eleven countries so far.

ABU Song Festivals - SEOUL 2012

Asiavision Pte's Our Sound: The Asia-Pacific Song Contest seems to have been indefinitely postponed. However, the Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union (ABU) are launching their own versions; which are not to be confused with Our Sound or Eurovision Song Contest. The "cultural extravaganza" concept may be the same, but the format is completely different. The Radio Festival will be competitive, while the TV Festival is just a showcase of music so is non-competitive.
ABU Radio Song Festival 2012 - Twenty-six entries from sixteen countries took part in a preliminary selection round. Of those, fifteen have been selected and will perform in the first ABU Radio Song Festival on 11 October 2012.
ABU TV Song Festival 2012 - Thirteen countries have confirmed participation in the first ABU TV Song Festival on 14 October 2012.

Members
The project had 90 members, with eighty-six active, and four inactive members at the time of publication. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list
Have you encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project..

New Recruits

We would like to welcome the following new members who joined since our last publication.

Olli (talk · contribs)

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 03:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project Memorandum

Eurovision Mini Memorandum

16 September 2012

A new RfC has opened at Project Eurovision in regards to how "Country by Contest" articles such as Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest, Denmark in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest and Australia in the ABU Song Festivals will be stylised.
It is important that all members of this project participate in the discussion so that we can share our views on how these articles should be presented, what content could do with being added/removed. If a consensus is reached and you have failed to participate then you only have yourself to blame if you disagreed with the layout style that has been reached.

To discontinue receiving Eurovision newsletters and mini memorandums, please remove your name from here.

This mini memorandum has been delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - October 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Inna-10-minutes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Inna-10-minutes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love Video.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Love Video.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inna discography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inna discography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inna discography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 08:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Inna-Christmas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inna-Christmas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Playing With Fire.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playing With Fire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Playing with fire video.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playing with fire video.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glitter & Grease listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glitter & Grease. Since you had some involvement with the Glitter & Grease redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blaxy Girls discography

The article Blaxy Girls discography has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bakertheacre ^Chat/_{What I Baked} 17:49, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Romanian Top 100

Template:Romanian Top 100 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Solidest (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]