User talk:Yoninah

• /Archive 1: July 2005-December 2005
• /Archive 2: January 2006-June 2006
• /Archive 3: July 2006-January 2007
• /Archive 4: October 2007-February 2010

Mattersdorf, Jerusalem

Good work on Mattersdorf! Now we need a few pictures.--Gilabrand (talk) 10:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Passover vs Passover (Christian holiday)

See discussion at Talk:Passover (Christian holiday)#Merge with Passover. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 06:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wonder Pot

Hello! Your submission of Wonder Pot at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer Waters 02:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Christian Yom Kippur discussion

Hi Yoninah: Regarding serious Christian content in the Yom Kippur article, please see Talk:Yom Kippur#Theological significance and Talk:Yom Kippur#Poll: Yom Kippur and Christianity. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 08:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Wonder Pot

On April 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wonder Pot, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

NW (Talk) 04:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Moving Breslev links to Breslov on Wikisource

I tried to get http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Author:Nachman_of_Breslev moved to Nachman of Breslov but it refused and said that page already exists, so I blanked the page and tried again but it still refused. Any idea? Thanks, Nissimnanach (talk) 16:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Nissimnanach

Zagreb Synagogue

As you may have noticed, Zagreb Synagogue has been promoted to GA status. Thank you for your help in improving it! GregorB (talk) 11:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi Yoninah: Please try to remember to place the {{subst:delsort|Judaism}}<small>~~~~</small> template in AfDs and CfDs relating to Judaic topics, such as in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 April 22#Category:People of Kohanim descent, and then listing it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism. this helps other Judaic editors keep track of deletion discussions. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 07:14, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Hasidic storytelling on Yiddish literature page

Hello Yoninah! I've just improved the Yiddish literature page, especially my former text on Hasidic storytelling and the Sippurei Ma'asiyot. Now it doesn't refer to "fairy tales"! I therefore took off the heading-section banner of "citations lacking". I hope it's OK now. Also, the image to represent the Sippurei Ma'asiyot on Hasidic philosophy is better! N.B. the former comparison of the Sleeping Beauty princess with its inversion in the "Lost Princess" is discussed in the Roskies book, "The Lost Art of Yiddish Storytelling" first chapter on Rabbi Nachman. But I took the uncited reference to this from the Yiddish literature page, as the Hasidic section needed to be similar brevity to the other sections, while such a detail, if cited, could be put on any future Sippurei Ma'asiyot page. I won't myself have the time to make such a page yet, as I now realise I would only want to do a proper job, and the research would take a long time.

I also admit (if you hadn't realised it already) to attempting to put the image of the Ukranian Trees-intuitive depiction of the imagination of Rabbi Nachman's Tales-on Nachman of Breslov page a couple of days ago! It was a long shot, as I guess it wasn't in keeping with the favoured concision of this page, but such intuitive imagery is more in keeping with the styles of other Hasidic pages on wikipedia. The image and caption probably wouldn't be out of place on, say, Hasidic philosophy or Deveikut, but there is already the other intuitive image to the Tales on Hasidic philosophy. Similar intuitive imagery is now on Hasidic Judaism. What do you think? Best Wishes April8 (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Yoninah. You have new messages at Jayjg's talk page.
Message added 04:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jayjg ^(talk) 04:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion Review: Category Jews vs Category: Jewish people

Dear Yoninah: Please see the serious Deletion Review discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 3#Category:Jewish people regarding the arbitrary and illogical replacement of Category:Jews by Category:Jewish people and its implications. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Prod: Meshulam Gross

Hi Yoninah: can you help the Meshulam Gross article. Debresser wants to get rid of it. What to make of it? IZAK (talk) 06:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Rav Odesser

I've changed "controversial" to "major." I think this is NPOV and I hope we can agree on this. Why should "controversial" be the first and foremost feature of this article? Anyone who's been to Israel has seen and heard Na Nach; the presence is very bold and widespread, and it is clearly a major influence. Also, why should opinion of the controvery be formed with respect to opinions of other "leaders" who are POV and have an interest in gaining or building a dynasty? Should we say Linux is controversial because it was rejected by influential companies Microsoft and Apple? Nissimnanach (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Nissimnanach

Follow-up CFD vote for Category Jews vs Category Jewish people

Hi Yoninah: As a result of the WP:DRV as noted above #Deletion Review: Category Jews vs Category: Jewish people, please see the final CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 May 10#Category:Jewish people. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 23:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

idea

Umm whilst waiting ..... approve/advise on everybody elses hooks at DYK? Victuallers (talk) 06:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Fred Thompson (writer) hook

Hi. I modified the hook at the Did You Know nominations page. See Thompson's entry. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

It looks like it has been put into the queue with your new and improved hook. Good job. Thanks for being a DYK reviewer. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

While I'm here, I see that you have an interest in Judaism. This is obviously not your usual area of interest, but it may tickle your fancy: I notice that there is no article on Virgin martyrs, even though many bio articles about early saints describe them as virgin martyrs. Feel like putting up a stub? Or, perhaps you know someone interested in Catholicism or saint articles? I also left a message at wikiproject Christianity noting this. Anyhow, all the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Notability concerns for Myer Rosenblum

Hi Yoninah !
Thank you for your comments - I now realise that his notability is questionable. Rosenblum is only just notable per WP:ATH. He played four (yep, only four) games for the New South Rugby union team. These were only post-facto recognised as Australian national Rugby Union team matches, and the retrospective recognition was for Rugby union in its amateur era . In that respect, the Rosenblum article would appear rather not DYK-worthy. I would argue that the "hook" for the article is that he gave the second longest serving Prime Minister of Australia his first job. Your thoughts?
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Dorothee Mields

Thank you for adding all those festivals to the singer's article! I replied at DYK. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

As a token of thanks my DYK I liked best so far, Christian Gerhaher 19 April: ... that singers Anne Sofie von Otter and Christian Gerhaher recorded music written in the concentration camp of Terezín by artists such as Ilse Weber, Hans Krása, Pavel Haas and Viktor Ullmann? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK problem

I think I've fixed your concern; sorry for the delay! ceranthor 20:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Breslov Research Institute

Thanks for the article Victuallers (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Louis Cottrell, Jr.

Clarified the hook & source. Thanks! Lionelt (talk) 08:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Harry van der Kamp

Thanks for treating the DYK for the singer! I said soloist to stress that although he has a career as a soloist he is also interested and engaged in ensemble singing. But singer is fine, of course. I will try to find out more precisely if he had solo or ensemble function with the Huelgas Ensemble and others, "worked with" could mean both. I wonder if the composer Gesualdo got a DYK when created, quite a story. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Ensembles being improved a bit, one more question: which category would show the teaching of this Dutch singer at a German Hochschule? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion, taken, Dutch academic added. But how to describe: teaching in Germany, but not German, just for curiosity, not urgent. (My very first article got cats English cellists and German cellists, for being of English nationality but playing in Germany, discussed and accepted.) I would also like to learn why it's "Van der Kamp" but not "Van Beethoven"? I'll look for an answer here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: DYK nom for Emil Mihalik

Hello, thanks for reviewing DYK nom for Emil Mihalek. I agreed to your suggestion. ----moreno oso (talk) 13:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Lunar eclipses DYK

Thanks for your very kind and helpful copyediting. Invertzoo (talk) 20:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Ingeborg Reichelt

Thanks for your advice on using the templates for references. I tried it on Ingeborg Reichelt, please have a look. Questions: which date to use if none is supplied or just a year? Which publisher, name or webname? How to provide a translation of a title, which seems sometimes useful for a fancy title in the German press? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Joel Spitzer

Hi, Yoninah. Great comments on my DYK nomination. There is a question for you on Talk:Joel Spitzer and a new ALT2 at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_May_22. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Yoninah, follow up for you on the DYK page. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

And again! Moved to Template_talk:Did_you_know#Special_occasion_holding_area. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review of Jews by "[non-Jewish] national descent"

Hi Yoninah: This may be of interest to you: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 28#Categories:American Jews/Jewish people by fooian descent. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 09:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Henry Radcliffe Crocker

Hi there, nice work on your recent edits to Henry Radcliffe Crocker. I just wanted to point out, though, that per WP:LEAD, the lead section is supposed to summarise the whole of the rest of the article. That's why there was biographical information there, it was summarising the first section. Eventually the lead will have even more info, but that's as far as I'd got so far! Regards, --BelovedFreak 10:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Colorado Highway

Alt hook given. Buggie111 (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't know if you were watchlisting the DYK discussion (now gone, it has been accepted into the queue) but in case you weren't, you are entirely mistaken: maps can definitely be used as sources without problem. SpinningSpark 23:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Wem Town Hall

Hi, Thanks for adding references and cleaning up Wem Town Hall to allow it to become a DYK. It is much appreciated. 03md 00:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK Terrain Gallery

Will look at the refs now, though realistically, will not compete until the morning.--SPhilbrickT 02:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I've improved a number of the refs, but it is slow going because so many are from the 50's and 60's. (See Talk:Terrain_Gallery for some of the details.)In many cases, the original editor used a footnote as a combination of a citation and an explanatory footnote. I left the explanatory material in, and converted the citation, when I could find one, to a proper format. I haven't fixed all of them - do you have a sense of whether every single one must be linked to an online reference?--SPhilbrickT 00:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the extensive work you did improving the article. I added an Alt hook per your suggestion.--SPhilbrickT 14:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Benton Air Force Station

I believe I have addressed your concerns about Benton Air Force Station. Some of the references seem dubious. Especially the bits about UFOs. I have elected to exclude them. Thank you for taking the time to look at the article. Dincher (talk) 01:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK process question

As nominator, I don't think I should be declaring that a DYK is good to go, but as you wrote the Alt hook, you might not be in a position to approve your own hook. I think we reached a great solution, with a vastly improved article and a good hook, I'd hate to stall here because others glance at this one and think it is being handled. I suggest that if you feel the article is OK, and two editors have endorsed the Alt hook, that you can go ahead and mark this approved. Does that make sense?--SPhilbrickT 15:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Lofty Large

Hi,

I'm nitpicking I know, but as the article is about a British subject, should we not be using the British spelling of "leukemia/leukaemia"? This is mentioned in the Leukaemia article itself as the British/Canadian spelling. Arthur Holland (talk) 08:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

No probs. :-) Arthur Holland (talk) 08:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kanfei Nesharim Street (Jerusalem)

Hello! Your submission of Kanfei Nesharim Street (Jerusalem) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 21:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your review

Hi, I've made the changes in the hook you requested to Template talk:Did you know#Grangegorman killings. Thanks for your time in reviewing it. Quasihuman (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kanfei Nesharim Street (Jerusalem)

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

I appreciate your improvements to Walter Muma. I had originally planned to make the itinerary sections much more detailed with more scenery photos but I had been working on this off-wiki for quite some time and wanted to finally see it live. Best wishes. Kindzmarauli (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

This is a belated thanks for all the work you did on the Terrain Gallery. Your editing greatly improved the article, which did get almost 1500 hits on the day it was featured on DYK. Thanks again. Trouver (talk) 16:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Might I correspond with you via email concerning another article I am working on? Thanks. Trouver (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

I am among a number of editors representing different views in a re-write of the entry on Aesthetic Realism. Our WP admin, Will Beback, is on a temporary leave and we would like a third party to work with us as we try to merge two drafts of one of the final sections. (see Drafts/3: Rewrite) Thanks for your consideration of this request.Trouver (talk) 19:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Help out with reviewing DYK nominations!

Hi Yoninah, I thank you for contributing to the DYK section. You may want to note that the nomination entry system for DYK is backlogged - nominations up till as early as July 4 have yet to receive a single review. There have only been reviews on some articles sporadically, across the board (July 3 to July 10). You may want to consider volunteering your services as a reviewer at this time. We need to clear the "older nominations" before it turns old (and stale). Quick link here. Thanks! AngChenrui (talk) 09:42, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK noms

Hey, thanks for reviewing my Medal of Honor nominations. :) I've replied to you at T:TDYK#Bernard Taylor (Medal of Honor), T:TDYK#George W. Thompson (Medal of Honor) and T:TDYK#James H. Turpin respectively. Best, Whisky drinker | HJ's sock 16:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Hook

Sure. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:59, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Yosef Meir Weiss

Hi Yonina,

More material was added using the sources I have available to me. Please take another look at the article.

Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK

Is there an official format style that indicates that titles in submissions should not be linked? I had seen in both ways. The vast majority of the time without a link. Sometimes with. That caught my eye, and seemed better. But if it is forbidden, I apologize, and thank you for the de-link. If there is no rule on it, I imagine I would prefer to link it, as in my official edit. Can you point me to a DYK or other rule that mandates that what I had done was not acceptable? Many thanks, and apologies.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Template talk:Did you know#Henryk Cederbaum

You might want to comment in the thread regarding this DYK nomination. There turned out to be a factual problem with the hook you suggested and another ALT hook is needed. Nsk92 (talk) 12:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

RE:Did You Know - Teach Me How to Dougie

Hello, Yoninah. You have new messages at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Teach_Me_How_To_Dougie.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

C. J. Stevens

Many thanks for your helpful review of the DYK for C. J. Stevens. I believe that it now meets the 5x expansion requirement. Let me know if you disagree. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Tx for your help there!--Epeefleche (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The Nine Days

Hi Yoninah: Since this is now the time, would it be possible for you to review and add or in any way improve The Nine Days article. Please find more sources as well. Thanks in advance. Sincerely, IZAK (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you, great job, and very timely too! IZAK (talk) 05:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Building and destroying the Beit Hamikdash

Looking over the articles relating to the Temple in Jerusalem, there is lots of confusion, some stemming from opposing secular and religious scholarly outlooks, but more so from various editors making major contributions over the course of a decade and creating and running parallel articles about what should be one topic. This is the situation at the moment:

1. Temple in Jerusalem is the over-all article. So far so good, but it does not connect with so many other articles about its own subject matter, essentially the First and Second Temples. There should really be more about its name and place in Judaism over the millennia as the Beit Hamikdash - "House of Holiness" that was built for, functioned for, existed for, was destroyed for, and prayed for by the Jewish people.
2. The First Temple article is at Solomon's Temple which reads like a Christian exposition and not like the holiest Jewish house of worship and sanctity that it was, while the Second Temple article is at Second Temple of Jerusalem. This is inconsistent. In addition, there is also a separate and parallel article for the Second Temple at Herod's Temple since Herod's Temple was an extension of the Second Temple.
3. When trying to place the destruction of the First and Second Temples, which according to Judaism occurred on Tisha B'Av, with the general dates for their destruction in Jewish history conventionally given as 586 BCE and 70 CE, when one tries to look for the times relating to the destruction of the First Temple, there is no linkage to the subject matter of the Jewish version such as the build up from The Three Weeks and The Nine Days but rather the Solomon's Temple/First Temple article links to Siege of Jerusalem (597 BC) which cites "Babylonian chronicles" (published by Donald Wiseman in 1956) making no mention of the accepted Jewish chronology and observances relating to the same time-frame. In fact it uses the Jewish-sounding months in the non-Jewish Babylonian time-frame. (The names were originally from Babylonia, but not the actual concepts and months themselves which were of Mosaic origin in the Torah itself). With more articles like this from non-Torah sources each with their own POV of course.
4. The only "normally named" Temple is the Third Temple, which does not even exist! While the First Temple and Second Temple have still not earned the honor of a clear-cut and clearly identifiable name and articles for themselves.

This is a big job. But to start, please see how the article about the First Temple/Solomon's Temple can be improved by inserting into it more Jewishly relevant material about it's destruction that incorporates the timely themes of Seventeenth of Tammuz; The Three Weeks; The Nine Days; Tisha B'Av. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 06:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Correct names for the First and Second Temples

Discussion about the correct names for the First and Second Temples at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Building and destroying the Beit Hamikdash. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 18:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

OPR Rybitwa nom

Hi, in re this [1], could you also leave a note at User:Loosmark talk page? He wrote the article, I just nominated it.radek (talk) 20:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

RE:Did You Know - Enrique Pérez Santiago

Hello, Yoninah. You have new messages at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Enrique Pérez Santiago.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

hope that makes it betterEl Johnson (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks El Johnson (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK Florence Blumenthal

I like your suggestion. Do I need to do anything, as in change the hook... or just wait? 842U (talk) 21:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Street of the Prophets

Hello! Your submission of Street of the Prophets at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nsk92 (talk) 21:34, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK hooks

Just wanted to say thanks for reviewing several of my DYK hooks. Strikehold (talk) 01:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Prix Blumenthal

Much better!

DYK hook for Sherman White (basketball)

Hi Yoninah. I see that you've been pretty active on verifying DYK hooks lately, and I didn't know where else to turn regarding a concern for one of my hooks. A few days ago, my hook for Sherman White (basketball) was accepted. I had written it to be:

"...that Sherman White was banned from ever playing in the NBA due to his involvement in a point shaving scandal in college?"

I just now looked at Template:Did you know/Queue to see how long it'll be until it makes the main page (because I thought it'd have been up there by now) and I find that the hook now reads:

"...that in 1950–51, Sherman White came within 77 points of becoming the National Collegiate Athletic Association's all-time single season leading scorer?"

Frankly I'm pissed. Not only did no one bother telling me, as the creator of the article, but the reason I chose my hook was because practically the entire article is about his involvement in one of the biggest controversies in college basketball history. Not only that, but the reason he didn't break the scoring record was because he was forced to prematurely quit the team once he was caught and the scandal broke! The hook, as it stands now, is a tangential DYK to Sherman White at best and is far less interesting (not to mention it's misleading) than the one I had written about being banned for life from the NBA.

Is there any way, if you get this in time, for you to change it? I can't figure out how and I'm really mad at whatever editor thought that his/her hook is better, because frankly it sucks. Thanks. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

• I've replied to your comment on my own talk page. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
• I've brought the issue up. It's thread can be found here. Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Wow 1,500 is a pretty solid number of views. Thanks for your help in resolving my issue. Jrcla2 (talk) 18:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Discussions

Given your recent interest in the underlying article, the RfC discussion here and the AfD here may be of interest to you.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Street of the Prophets

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Justin_McIsaac

Please see my comment in Template talk:Did you know#Justin McIsaac, thanks,  Chzz  ►  12:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

It works. Good edits, thanks!

Hello, Yoninah. You have new messages at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Dhimit.C3.ABr_Anagnosti.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Sulmues ^(talk) 15:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Made a little tweak to your Alt1 [2] and added source to hook [3], hope it's Ok with you. Why did you put the vote sign and not the Confirmed sign?--Sulmues ^(talk) 15:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Excellent and thanks for letting me know how the Alt thing works, I had never figured it out and was too lazy to research it. Best! --Sulmues ^(talk) 16:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Yoninah. You have new messages at Template talk:Did you know#Anup Rai.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-Secret Saturdays (talk to me) 23:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Also, was the article a pass? Secret Saturdays (talk to me) 23:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Second Temple (Judaism)

Hi Yoninah: Please see what you can do to deal with the "message" from the "CorenSearchBot" on the Second Temple (Judaism) article which appeared out of nowhere when I redirected the page without omitting anything from its previous Second Temple of Jerusalem location per the general consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Building and destroying the Beit Hamikdash. Thanks for your help in advance. Sincerely, IZAK (talk) 06:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Please

do not change other editors comments as you did here. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Temple discussion at ANI

Hi Yoninah: A discussion and related vote you participated in is being reviewed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#All talk pages, and more, were notified about the discussions and proposed moves. You may want to add your views to the ongoing discussion. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Rabbi Berkowitz

Why do you continuously remove my statements about Rabbi Yitzchak Berkowitz? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.97.251 (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:

To begin with, I have listened to Rabbi Berkowitz for years and would never slander him. Secondly, I am not synthesizing anything- I am simply quoting what he himself has said. It is simply a published quote from a living person recorded through audio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ventura488 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

RFA - I think you ought to!

I can understand your preference for content work. Despite Jimbo's pronouncement that adminship "should be no big deal" it has a habit of drawing people into all sorts of machinations. I now do predominantly content work and that is probably what I prefer. The tools are useful when I need them and if someone makes a request. JFW | T@lk 20:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

I'd second this idea, although you nmay need to enable e-mail :) -- Avi (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Yoninah. You have new messages at Jfdwolff's talk page.
Message added 16:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for all the cleanup

I wanted to take the time to thank you for all of the times that you've cleaned up the little messes I've created and for all the work that you've been doing at DYK. Your efforts are greatly appreciated. Alansohn (talk) 18:59, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Regarding a DYK question

Regarding this, could you copy this request to this user's talk page? Currently he takes care of such issues for our WikiProject. Thanks, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks!AMuseo (talk) 15:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Maharishi Peace Palace

Thanks for your copy-editing of Maharishi Peace Palace. Many small changes make for a big improvement.   Will Beback  talk  16:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Bach Missa

Thank you for prompting me to improve Missa Brevis a bit (by finding the hook for BWV 179), - that has been on my to-do-list for a while. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Yoninah. You have new messages at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Battle_of_Flores_.281591.29.
Message added 04:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK nomination of Berman's Bakery

Hello! Your submission of Berman's Bakery at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 15:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

cookie

Tommy2010 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

For [4] -- well done!! Tommy! [message] 00:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Box and Cox

I suggested an alt hook at the DYK nom . Can you please revisit it? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I added the information you requested to support the first hook. I also think your Alt 2 is good. So please go ahead with either one. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Veda Brown

Thanks for your edits. Referencing is not my strong point, so I'm grateful for the help. One point I noticed is that you changed "sweepstake" to "sweepstakes". That reflects US usage rather than my (UK) usage (where the word "sweepstake" is used, unless there is more than one of them), and therefore your change is fine - but I wonder whether the drawing of lots to choose a name would be described as a "sweepstakes" in any case in the US. Would it? I'm in the hands of editors who use US terminology here. Can you advise? Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. The ref says "sweepstake" - here - so we'll stick to that. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Angel Bakeries

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Berman's Bakery

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

In convertendo Dominus

Thank you for your help with Günter Reich and your approving words. I would like to interest you in the DYK nom for a great psalm composition we will sing on Sunday - a personal Special occasion for me. - Question concerning cite web: I understand that you use "date" for a precise date and "year" if you just know that. Wrong? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)