Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WPVG icon 2016.svg WikiProject
Video games
Main page talk
Guidelines
Manual of Style talk
  Article naming talk
Sources talk
  Search engine
Templates
Wikidata Guide
Departments
Assessment
Reference library talk
  Online print archive
  Sales charts
  Website archive
Newsletter talk
  Current issue Draft
Articles
Article alerts
Article for Improvement
  Voting
Deletion discussions
Essential articles
New articles
Popular pages
Recognized content
  Good article Good content
  Featured article Featured content
Requested articles

viewtalkeditchanges

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Video games. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary, it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Video games|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Video games.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from August 2015) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

See also Games-related deletions.


Video games-related deletions[edit]

List of GameHouse Original Stories[edit]

List of GameHouse Original Stories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

A long list of non-notable video games, none with its own article. Sourced primarily by its publisher and digital distribution channels. WP:NOTCATALOG. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE, also serves as a list of links for downloading or purchasing. Ajf773 (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete unnecessary list. Orientls (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

List of City of Heroes characters[edit]

List of City of Heroes characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

This article has been tagged since 2008 for in-universe style, reliance on primary refs and lack of notability. Most of it isn’t sourced at all. Some sections may be merged to City of Heroes but for the most part it does not meet our notability requirements. Mccapra (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

EV Interactive[edit]

EV Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Article topic does not appear to be notable per WP:GNG. This search of the WP:VG/SE pulls up nothing of interest or significance. Izno (talk) 05:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 05:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 05:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Lawnmower Racing Mania 2007[edit]

Lawnmower Racing Mania 2007 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Article topic does not appear to be notable based on this search on the WP:VG/SE. Metacritic similarly lists no professional reviews from print sources. Izno (talk) 05:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 05:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete The only thing I was able to find was Igromania coverage at [1]. A shovelware release that didn't rise to notability, fails WP:GNG for the lack of multiple significant coverage in reliable sources. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Smallant1[edit]

Smallant1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Please nominate Smallant1 for deletion, Thank you. No reliable sources has been presented and it fails Notability for youtuber. 58.121.22.165 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


Nomination on behalf of IP. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:NBIO. Does not appear to have notability from significant mentions in reliable sources.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Three intellectually separate secondary sources have been sourced (Medium, Polygon, LPB Community Corner), fulfilling WP:NBIO Basic Criteria, as I understand it. As per WP:ENT Has made 'unique contributions' in the SMO community (see Medium article[1]) and has a sizable following. Subscriber count may be lower than other notable YouTubers, but Smallant1 the is the #1 BOTW and SMO streamer on Twitch. Lycelsara (talk) 10:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
  1. ^ Zach Benson (13 November 2019). "The Art of Speed Running (feat. Smallant1 & Keizaron)". Medium. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  • Delete. There isn't enough coverage in the sources already in the article to establish notability, and I was unable to find more when I searched myself. Of the sources mentioned by Lycelsara, Medium is self published and unreliable, the LBP source is an interview on an extremely niche website which does little to nothing to contribute to notability, and the Polygon article is not particularly significant in its coverage. Lowercaserho (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Index of gaming articles[edit]

Index of gaming articles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

I'm struggling to understand what this index is even supposed to accomplish. It's not listed at Wikipedia:Contents/Indices or linked in the nav template at the bottom. Is it... just... every possible thing about games? It doesn't seem to distinguish between game concepts, individual articles about board and video games, types of games, people/companies who make games, people who play games, etc. It's just a (hopelessly incomplete) alphabetized list of everything that might have to do with games if you squint at it a little (and if it were complete, it would be hundreds of pages long). Outline of games seems to be this article but in a more organized and restricted fashion. Why does this exist? Axem Titanium (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete Yep this seems like a pointless article. Really sloppy and lacking a defined purpose. Bluedude588 (talk) 23:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per above and too self-referential. Possibly move to a wikiproject page if a wikiproject wants it. The keep arguments in the previous AFD (e.g. "an index of all gaming articles is an appropriate goal to accommodate navigation through the ocean of gaming subjects covered on Wikipedia") are very unconvincing. See also discussions such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of India-related articles. DexDor (talk) 12:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Love Football[edit]

Love Football (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Nominating this for its lack of notability. Cannot find any sources online and it being Japanese exclusive it may not have any English sources to it. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete This article is one of the reasons I think A7 should matter for products too. I was simply unable to find multiple in-depth coverage in reliable sources (nor there is a JP Wiki counterpart to look for more), and this a clear failure of WP:GNG. There are pre-release brief articles like [2] and one Japanese indepth review [3], but nothing that would signal GNG being met/need for a standalone article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
One indepth source is not enough to meet WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:06, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete - I did a search for "LoveFOOTBALL 青き戦士たちの軌跡" which seems to be the official Japanese name (I don't speak the language sadly). I found a few different game database entries, but was unable to find anything more than what Ludost Mlačani found. Without more, doesn't meet WP:GNG. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

List of Devil Hunter Yohko video games[edit]

List of Devil Hunter Yohko video games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

This is a bare bones list that does not seem to be needed. With only three games listed there does not seem to be a use for it. GamerPro64 17:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:43, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete. Absolutely useless content fork. Ajf773 (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • This could have just been redirected/merged to Devil Hunter Yohko#Video games. Invoking AFD bureaucracy is a complete waste of time when there's such an easy editing solution, not to mention contrary to policy. postdlf (talk) 20:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Devil Hunter Yohko#Video games as there are some earlier versions of this article that could help be mined for information, although that information would require a video game reliable source. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Devil Hunter Yohko#Video games as an obvious WP:ATD per above. Doesn't serve the navigational purpose as there is only one game with Wiki article (also having questionable notability on it's own), and there aren't many sources that talk about the games to support the list. The section is quite sufficient to cover the subject. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

List of Game Room games[edit]

List of Game Room games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Similar to other 'List of [x games] on [x platform]', another WP:CATALOG of a huge list of video games for the Game Room virtual arcade. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep (though should be merged to Game Room, that article is short enough to support the list). Unlike the other lists that are mentioned above, this is not the same type of catalog: this is effectively the list of downloadable content for Game Room. Outside of product availability/discontinuation, it isn't the case of these games being temporarily free - the packs remain(ed?) available to download through the life of the 360 and product. It is equivalent to, say, List of PlayStation Now games, List of Virtual Console games for Nintendo 3DS (North America) and the more general List of Xbox 360 games. To stress, the other lists that were deleted were just listing games that were offered for free for a limited time, which is what made those lists more catalog-like than just a listing. --Masem (t) 15:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Masem:, thanks for your input. I don't see a huge difference there. Maybe it's not very similar to PlayStation Plus and similar listings, but what about List of OnLive games? Game Room itself is no longer available and this is a list of games that were available for purchase for that particular digital distribution channel. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Fully aware the differences are extremely subtle. A core one are that the lists I had put to AFD and since were deleted were based on "games free/discounted for a limited time". That's effectively documenting a sale period. Unless that sale had significant downstream effects (And in the ur example of this, Rocket League had temporarily been offered free on the PlayStation at its launch which is reported to have significantly helped the title's popularity and growth, so that sale promotion is documented in the article), we should not include such sales or discounts per NOTCATALOG. To this Game Room list, nothing about sales or promotions are given outside of noting one had to buy some of these , others may have offered free at all times (not a sale/promotion period). These were simply the list of older arcade games that had been made available to this title. One can consider this a game platform, and we generally do document all games available for such platforms. yeeees, this could be considered a catalog to a degree, but again, a key point of the NOTCATALOG argument is that these lists are neutral of any pricing or promotion aspects, simply documenting what one could potentially get. (In this vein, the deleted lists were thus subsets of "List of games for (platform)"). But again, its subtle and a similar question or two were raised in the prior AFDs. --Masem (t) 17:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
And also to add, I know we also have some "List of free-to-play" games. While we're talking a $0 price point on these games, these games were always (or retroactively made) to be offered free (which is a notable facet in the vg industry, the whole freemium game model), not as part of a promotional or sale. So that's another difference to consider. --Masem (t) 17:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Per Masem. This is not the same as those other lists. --McDoobAU93 16:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. This does appear to be a retrospective catalogue, nothing really providing the list any notability. Ajf773 (talk) 07:14, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

LDShadowLady[edit]

LDShadowLady (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Number of viewers & rankings might qualify her but almost all the sources here are not valid. Not finding other acceptable relevant sources to demonstrate WP:GNG. Plenty of WP:OR here. Without much more sourcing this doesn't appear valid. JamesG5 (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep - I was pretty skeptical myself to start here; I'm not one to think highly of YouTube streamers as being noteworthy subjects. But, a WP:BEFORE check on Google using the News filter seems to have turned up several sources which look to be potentially reliable. At least one or two call her the UK's top female gamer streamer, and there are a couple of articles specifically about her, with numerous mentions elsewhere. Some of the key ones I found:[4][5] This article needs work, but my search seems to indicate she might pass GNG. Red Phoenix talk 05:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete Currently, the article is in need to a desperate rework if this article is kept as almost all sources are primary or unreliable. In regards to notability, I do not think the the subject is notable enough for a standalone article. The subject has garnered some coverage like the two dedicated articles by Evening Standard and Gazette Review ([6], [7]) as pointed out by Red Phoenix in addition to its mentions in listicles. However when applying WP:GNG how must consider the reliablity of the sources. The Evening Standard has no consensus of reliablity per WP:RSP and I am not convinced about the reliablity of Gazette Review. The reliablity aspect is especially important here as we are dealing with a WP:BLP. The other brief mentions in mostly unreliable sources (with the exception of The Guardian [8]) do not demonstrate notablity hence fails WP:GNG.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep The Guardian article counts is significant coverage in a reliable source. So does ABC news, opinion of a paid editor, [9] so that passes the requirements of the general notability guidelines. She gets coverage in Daily Mail [10] and elsewhere that aren't considered reliable sources anymore apparently, but doesn't matter, you only need two reliable sources found from searching through the many Google news search results to prove she is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Dream Focus 17:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
    @Dream Focus: Two brief mentions of the subject in opinion pieces in reliable sources (The Guardian and ABC News) do not constitute as significant coverage. To quote WP:GNG: "Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content." Here plainly this is the case.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
    The ABC one has them doing a long interview with her. IGN translated [11] shows she was in a Minecraft game Minecraft:_Story_Mode#A_Portal_to_Mystery_(Episode_6). She gets brief mention in Marie Claire [12] "The ultimate vlogger event is coming to London for the first time" calling her "the UK’s top female gamer on YouTube". Significant is what they say not how many words they say it in. Dream Focus 18:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
    @Dream Focus: The interview from ABC from my understanding is an informal interview with an eight-year old talking about the generational gap in entertainment with a mention of the subject which does not add any notablity. But even if it was with the subject it would not add significant coverage since WP:GNG requires coverage to be in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The brief mentions in IGN and Marie Claire also do not fulfill as significant coverage as there is not in-depth. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention. The label "the UK's top female gamer on YouTube" does not automatically make the subject notable enough to warrant a separate page.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 18:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
    Passes the subject specific guideline for Entertainers "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.". WP:ENTERTAINER has been met so the article can be kept. Dream Focus 19:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
    @Dream Focus: Understandably the subject has 4.9 million subscribers which is a considerable fan base. However, that guideline means they are likely to be notable and meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. Currently, the subject has not passed WP:BASIC (WP:GNG) with no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject hence it should be deleted. Perhaps, if there were more reliable coverage, even if more not fully in-depth, I would suggest "Keep" but currently this is certainly not the case so I still think it should be deleted due to the lack of notablity.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 21:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Pokémon Insurgence[edit]

Pokémon Insurgence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Non-notable fan game. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Should probably get a mention somewhere given the first reference in the article, but I and the WP:VG/SE otherwise agree the topic is not notable enough for a standalone page. --Izno (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Merge Can't find additional sources beyond that Kotaku (from RSes, that is). There should probably be a section in the main Pokemon VG Series article about fan made games, which have individually weak notability but are notable as a general class of game to be mentioned there. --Masem (t) 18:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete An obvious case of WP:TOOSOON. Can be recreated at a later date once it gets more coverage besides just a couple articles.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete The only reliable coverage is the Kotaku article thus it fails WP:GNG. I would not be opposed to it being mentioned in a small fan-made section on Pokémon as mentioned by Masem.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:07, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge - There could be a List of Pokémon fan games, or similar, I suppose, which would be a good location for a merge and redirect. I don't think the main Pokémon article would be a suitable location for specific fan games, (maybe a small sections in general though). If there isn't a specific merge location, then delete would be fine - clearly doesn't pass WP:GNG at this time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
    • I wouldn't even call for a separate list. The idea of Pokemon fan games is just barely notable, so a standalone is not a good idea (and will draw "hey, post my homefan fan project!" type entries). Plus, with the recent release of Temtem, a section in Pokémon (video game series) of Legacy, with "games inspired by Pokemon" and "Fan-made games" (Alongside Nintendo's avid takedown of such games, per [13]), there is a very comfy fit for all that there. --Masem (t) 01:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)