Hong Kong independence movement
The Hong Kong independence movement (Traditional Chinese:香港獨立運動, Simplified Chinese:香港独立运动) is a movement that advocates Hong Kong becoming an independent sovereign state. Following the handover of Hong Kong to the People's Republic of China, many Hongkongers have expressed concern over the governance by the Communist Party of China over issues surrounding justice, freedom, democratic development, as well as well-developed economic environment after being a special administrative region. Some of them want the current SAR to become a sovereign city-state like Singapore. According to HKPOP's 2007 poll, 25% of Hong Kongers preferred an independent Hong Kong rather than an SAR ruled by PRC, an increase from 22% in 2005, while 64.7% of interviewees thought it should not be independent. 33% of interviewees said they would prefer independence if the Communist Party still rules PRC in 2047, when the Sino-British Joint Declaration expires, but stated that they would prefer to remain part of the country if and only if the Communist Party reforms into a full democracy with universal suffrage.
This movement should not be confused with the Hong Kong Autonomy Movement, which rather than advocate independence from the PRC, demands that the PRC allow and implement the Hong Kong people a high degree of autonomy, as was promised at the Handover of 1997.
The territories of Hong Kong were not entirely ceded to Britain at one time. The cessions were divided into three periods. In 1842, Hong Kong Island was formally ceded in perpetuity to the United Kingdom under the Treaty of Nanking. In 1860, after China's defeat in the Second Opium War, the Kowloon Peninsula and Stonecutter's Island were ceded in perpetuity to Britain under the Convention of Peking. In 1898, under the terms of the Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory, Britain obtained a 99-year lease of Lantau Island and the adjacent northern lands, which became known as the New Territories.
The ethnic majority of Hong Kong is Cantonese, including natives and immigrants from mainland China. Most of them escaped to Hong Kong due to the unrest in mainland China, such as the Civil War, and the ruling of Cultural Revolution. A sense of Chinese ethnicity and Hong Kong citizenship is stronger than Chinese citizenship.
In 16 December 1946, the United Nations Special Committee on Decolonization assented colonies, such as Singapore, Hong Kong and Macau, to being independent. However, both Hong Kong and Macau were later removed from the list by request of the People's Republic of China,. The PRC preferred to negotiate directly with the two colonial powers, the United Kingdom and Portugal, in order to avoid self-determination by the citizens in the two colonies. In 1960, UN Resolution 1514 was approved, which advocated that all colonies should be formally independent if they desire. In 1972, the permanent UN seat of the Republic of China was replaced by the People's Republic of China.
After the replacement, PRC proposed bilateral negotiation between China and Britain to resolve the Hong Kong sovereignty issue. Although China opposed Britain's attempts to push through last-minute democratic reform in Hong Kong on technical grounds, it did not oppose representative democracy in Hong Kong in principle; it only objected to "the introduction of any independence movement". When the negotiation had started, the mainland officials demanded that only the colonial powers were to negotiate the terms of the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Sino-Portuguese Joint Declaration directly with China, isolating public consultation from the political processes up to the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong and the transfer of sovereignty over Macau.
Some main reasons that caused the movement are listed below:
- Leftist Riot in 1967.
- The Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984 declares that the Britain would return all territories of Hong Kong to the People's Republic of China in 1997.
- The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 incited concern and skepticism over the PRC government's commitment to democracy. It also caused more Hong Kong people to worry about the Communists, eventually led to the mass migration wave of 1989.
- The controversial political reforms in 2012.
- Difference in ideology between Hong Kong and PRC: Hong Kong has been a developed capitalist economy since the 1980s. Although there is one Basic Law article which states that Hong Kong's systems and polices shall remain unchanged for 50 years, some people still believe that the PRC socialist regime would ruin Hong Kong's original economic environment and freedom. Politically, some people are afraid that Hong Kong would never have democracy under the PRC governance.
- The proposed enactment of the Article 23, Basic Law.
- Early 2012 Hong Kong protests
- 2014 Hong Kong protests
Independence advocates hope to create a democratic "Republic of Hong Kong", independent from China. Some hope a contest should be hosted to vote for the future flag of Hong Kong. New passports should be created. In the meantime, Hong Kong independence advocates want recognition in the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization.  There is also a possibility that such a state could join the British Commonwealth and adopt Elizabeth II as constituent monarch.
Comments by Chinese government
According to Zhang Dinghuai, a political scientist at Shenzhen University, those people who call for Hong Kong's "independence" represent a small minority amid a larger Chinese population which is pained by "the painful memory of national disintegration". Zhang pointed out that Beijing already grants Hong Kong a large level of autonomy, and that independentist complaints about the National People's Congress's power to interpret Court of Final Appeal decisions were unreasonable for a non-sovereign state.
On 20 September 2012 Chen Zuo'er, former deputy director at the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, said he was "heartbroken" by protestors who waved British colonial flags and demanded "Chinese scram back to China" during protests against cross-border traders in Sheung Shui. On October 1, 2012 protesters again waved the Blue Ensign of Hong Kong and chanted "We are Hongkongers, not Chinese [nationals]" in front of the Central Government's Liaison office in Hong Kong. In response on October 12, Lu Ping, a former director and Chen's boss at the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, caused a minor controversy when he called the protesters "morons", asking "Do they know where the water they are daily drinking comes from?" On October 31, the Global Times advocated a cool response to independentists, explaining that separatist feelings in Hong Kong were a result of resentment at mainland China's economic development, which has robbed some Hongkongers of a "sense of superiority" over mainlanders.
On November 1, Lu challenged independence advocates to renounce their Chinese citizenship, saying "Our country, which has a population of 1.3 billion, would not be bothered losing this handful of people". The convener of the Executive council, Lam Woon-kwong denied the emergence of an independence movement. On November 5, Alex Lo of the South China Morning Post (SCMP) asserted that "There is no sign the movement is anything but the asinine rumblings of a few malcontents and juveniles", cautioning that Lu's comments were "making [the protestors] feel important instead of ridiculous".
- Early 2012 Hong Kong protests
- Hong Kong 1 July marches
- Politics of Hong Kong
- Hongkongese Priority
- 2014 Hong Kong protests
- 安平，“港独”暗流涌动网际 与各路分裂势力关系密切，中国新闻网，中新社香港，2005-02-06
- Courtauld, Caroline; Holdsworth, May; Vickers, Simon (1997). The Hong Kong Story. Oxford University Press. pp. 38–58. ISBN 978-0-19-590353-9.
- Hoe, Susanna; Roebuck, Derek (1999). The Taking of Hong Kong: Charles and Clara Elliot in China Waters. Routledge. p. 203. ISBN 978-0-7007-1145-1.
- Wiltshire, Trea (1997). Old Hong Kong. Volume II: 1901–1945 (5th ed.). FormAsia Books. p. 148. ISBN 962-7283-13-4.
- "History of Hong Kong". Global Times. 6 July 2010. Retrieved 31 August 2010.
- Scott, Ian (1989). Political change and the crisis of legitimacy in Hong Kong. University of Hawaii Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-8248-1269-0.
- Byrne, Joseph Patrick (2008). Encyclopedia of Pestilence, Pandemics, and Plagues: A-M. ABC-CLIO. p. 499. ISBN 0-313-34102-8.
- 中国大陆迁入香港的人口研究 李若建 香港中文大學 中國研究大學服務中心 2008/08/30
- 香港人的身份認同 香港觀察 譚衛兒 第一段:若別人問我們是不是中國人,我們不會否認。
- Liu, Xiaomei; Bin, Han. "The Basic Laws of HK and Macao SARs aren’t Subnational Constitutions in China". Institute of Law, China. Retrieved 24 February 2013.
- Postiglione, Gerard; Tang, James (1997). Hong Kong's Reunion with China: The Global Dimensions. Hong Kong University Press. p. 96.
- Elliot, Elsie (2003). Colonial Hong Kong in the Eyes of Elsie Tu. Hong Kong University Press. pp. 135–136.
- Patten, Christopher (1999). East and West: China, Power, and the Future of Asia. Crown. p. 32.
- Lai, Carol (2007). Media in Hong Kong: Press Freedom and Political Change, 1967–2005. Taylor & Francis. p. 83.
- CCPR/C/SR.2351 英文版
- Zhang, Dinghuai (2012-11-06). "'HK independence' an empty argument". Global Times. Retrieved 2012-11-16.
- Chan, Gary (2012-09-21). "Handover official Chen Zuo'er laments British flags at protests". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2012-11-16.
|last2=in Authors list (help)
- "Protests express freedom, not independence sentiment". South China Morning Post. 2012-11-02. Retrieved 2012-11-16.
- Lu, Ping. "Letters to the Editor, October 12, 2012: HK can't do without mainland". South China Morning Post.
- Lau, Gary (2012-11-01). "Love China or leave, Lu Ping tells Hong Kong's would-be secessionists". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2012-11-16.
|last2=in Authors list (help)
- "HK independence no more than an empty slogan". Global Times. 2012-10-31. Retrieved 2012-11-16.
- Lo, Alex (2012-11-05). "Flag-wavers have right to be ridiculous". South China Morning post. Retrieved 2012-11-16.
- Associated Press, 15 November 2004
- Associated Press, 16 November 2004
- South China Morning Post, 7 February 2005 at the Wayback Machine (archived February 15, 2005)