Vitamin C megadosage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Chemical structure of vitamin C
Chemical structure of vitamin C

Vitamin C megadosage is a term describing the consumption or injection of vitamin C (ascorbate) in doses comparable to the amounts produced by the livers of most other mammals. Such dosages correspond to amounts well beyond the current Dietary Reference Intake. Oral dosages are usually divided and consumed in portions over the day. Injections of hundreds of grams per day are advocated by some physicians for the treatment of certain conditions, poisonings, or recovery from trauma. People who practice vitamin C megadosage may consume many vitamin C pills throughout each day or dissolve pure vitamin C crystals in water or juice and drink it throughout the day.

Vitamin C megadoses are claimed by alternative medicine advocates including Matthias Rath and Patrick Holford to have effects on diseases such as cancer and AIDS,[1][2] but there isn't conclusive scientific evidence to back these claims.[3] Some trials show some effect in combination with other therapies, but this does not imply vitamin C megadoses in themselves have therapeutic effect.[4]

Contents

Background [edit]

The World Health Organization recommends a daily intake of 45 mg/day of vitamin C for healthy adults.[5] Vitamin C is necessary for production of collagen and other biomolecules, and for the prevention of scurvy.[6] Vitamin C is an antioxidant, which has led to its endorsement by some researchers as a complementary therapy for improving quality of life.[7] Since the 1930s, when it first became available in pure form, some physicians have experimented with higher than recommended vitamin C consumption or injection.[8]

Primates, including humans, and guinea pigs do not synthesize vitamin C internally.[9] Nearly all other animals synthesize vitamin C internally, maintaining cellular vitamin C concentrations that are considerably higher than those achieved with the Recommended Daily Intake set for humans. Irwin Stone coined the term hypoascorbia to describe the low level of vitamin C maintained in humans through their diet compared to the level other animals maintain through their internal production. He proposed that hypoascorbia is caused by a genetic defect in humans and most primates. Animals that produce ascorbate internally produce considerably higher amounts when they are stressed.[10]

Vitamin C has been promoted in alternative medicine as a treatment for the common cold, cancer, polio and various other illnesses. The evidence for these claims is mixed. Orthomolecular-based megadose recommendations for vitamin C are based mainly on theoretical speculation and observational studies, such as those published by Fred R. Klenner from the 1940s through the 1970s. There is a strong advocacy movement for such doses of vitamin C, and there is an absence of large scale, formal trials in the 10 to 200+ grams per day range. The single repeatable side effect of oral megadose vitamin C is a mild laxative effect if the practitioner attempts to consume too much too quickly. A tolerable upper limit (UL) of vitamin C was set at 2 grams for the first time in the year 2000, referencing this mild laxative effect as the reason for establishing the UL. This 2 g UL restricts the acceptance of formal vitamin C megadose trials by Institutional review boards.[citation needed]

Conditions [edit]

Common cold [edit]

A 2010 Cochrane Review concluded:[11]

The failure of vitamin C supplementation to reduce the incidence of colds in the general population indicates that routine prophylaxis is not justified. Vitamin C could be useful for people exposed to brief periods of severe physical exercise. While the prophylaxis trials have consistently shown that vitamin C reduces the duration and alleviates the symptoms of colds, this was not replicated in the few therapeutic trials that have been carried out.

Heart disease [edit]

Clinical trials investigating the use of vitamin C in the prevention of coronary disease or strokes have produced equivocal results, with positive, negative and neutral outcomes. Issues with methodology, patient selection and study design make the results of the studies difficult to interpret.[12]

Cancer [edit]

The use of vitamin C in high doses as a treatment for cancer was promoted by Linus Pauling, based on a 1976 study published with Ewan Cameron which reported intravenous vitamin C significantly increased lifespans of patients with advanced cancer.[13][14] This trial was criticized by the National Cancer Institute for being designed poorly, and three subsequent trials conducted at the Mayo Clinic could not replicate these results.[14][15]

More recently, in vitro data in animal models suggests intravenous ascorbic acid at high doses may hold some promise in the treatment of cancer, however this has not been supported in more rigorous clinical trials in humans. Preliminary clinical trials in humans have shown that it is unlikely to be a "miracle pill" for cancer and more research is necessary before any definitive conclusions about efficacy can be reached.[16] A 2010 review of 33 years of research on vitamin C to treat cancer stated "we have to conclude that we still do not know whether Vitamin C has any clinically significant antitumor activity. Nor do we know which histological types of cancers, if any, are susceptible to this agent. Finally, we don't know what the recommended dose of Vitamin C is, if there is indeed such a dose, that can produce an anti-tumor response."[15]

The American Cancer Society has stated, "Although high doses of vitamin C have been suggested as a cancer treatment, the available evidence from clinical trials has not shown any benefit."[14]

Treatment of phencyclidine psychosis [edit]

Large dosages of vitamin C can be used to augment an antipsychotic in the treatment of acute phencyclidine (PCP) psychosis. Usually, 1000–2000 mg. of vitamin C are given intravenously over the course of 5–10 minutes. It is given in combination with a DA-2 antagonist such as haloperidol or risperidone. The antagonist is given intramuscularly and not combined with vitamin C. The vitamin acts synergistically with phencyclidine or its metabolites.[17]

Burns [edit]

Due to the unique metabolic conditions after severe burns, short term intravenous administration of vitamin C has been suggested as an adjuvant treatment. One study used high intravenous doses of vitamin C (66 mg/kg/hour over 24 hours, for a total dose of around 110 grams) after severe burn injury,[18] but despite being described as promising, it has not been replicated by independent institutions and thus is not a widely accepted treatment.[19] Based on that study, the American Burn Association (ABA) considers high dose ascorbic acid an "option" to be considered for adjuvant therapy in addition to the more accepted standard treatments.[20] Guidelines released by the ABA noted there is likely no benefit beyond decreased intravenous fluid volume needs and there needs to be larger multicenter trials to replicate this study result before vitamin C is accepted as a standard treatment.[20] However, one medical review article noted vitamin C at the doses studied can be toxic, and recommended further validation by future studies before this therapy is clinically used,[18] and another noted that this therapy is not a mainstream treatment although the study results can be meaningful to physicians experienced in treating severe burns.[21]

Prevention of chronic severe pain after injury [edit]

Clinical trials using various daily doses of vitamin C to prevent complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) in wrist-fracture patients have, preliminarily, shown promising initial results;[22][23] however, as the cause of CRPS is not known at this time (nor the optimal vitamin C dosage), further research is necessary.

Possible adverse effects [edit]

Although sometimes considered free of toxicity, there are known side effects from vitamin C intake, and it has been suggested that any administration should require "a medical environment and trained professionals."[16]

Side effects [edit]

Blood levels of vitamin C remain steady at approximately 200 mg per day. Although vitamin C can be well tolerated at doses well above the RDA recommendations, adverse effects can occur at doses above 3 grams per day though overload is unlikely. The common 'threshold' side effect of megadoses is diarrhea. Other possible adverse effects include increased oxalate excretion and kidney stones, increased uric acid excretion, systemic conditioning ("rebound scurvy"), preoxidant effects, iron overload, reduced absorption of vitamin B12 and copper, increased oxygen demand and acid erosion of the teeth with chewing ascorbic acid tablets.[25] In addition, one case has been noted of a woman who had received a kidney transplant followed by high-dose vitamin C and died soon afterwards as a result of calcium oxalate deposits that destroyed her new kidney. Her doctors concluded that high-dose vitamin C therapy should be avoided in patients with renal failure.[26]

Chance of overdose [edit]

As discussed previously, vitamin C generally exhibits low toxicity. The LD50 (the dose that will kill 50% of a population) is generally accepted to be 11900 milligrams [11.9 grams] per kilogram in rat populations.[27]

Conflicts with prescription drugs [edit]

Pharmaceuticals designed to reduce stomach acid, such as the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), are among the most widely-sold drugs in the world. One PPI, omeprazole (Prilosec), has been found to lower the bioavailability of vitamin C by 12% after 28 days of treatment, independent of dietary intake. The probable mechanism of vitamin C reduction, intragastric pH elevated into alkalinity, would apply to all other PPI drugs, though not necessarily to doses of PPIs low enough to keep the stomach slightly acidic.[28] In another study, 40 mg/day of omeprazole lowered the fasting gastric vitamin C levels from 3.8 to 0.7 mcg/mL.[29]

Aspirin may also inhibit the absorption of vitamin C.[30][31][32]

Genetic deficiency and broad spectrum hypotheses [edit]

Linus Pauling's popular and influential book How to Live Longer and Feel Better, first published in 1986, advocated very high doses of vitamin C.

Since its discovery vitamin C has been considered almost a universal panacea by some,[33] although this led to suspicions of it being overhyped by others.[34]

Humans and higher primates, as well as guinea pigs and small number of other animal species, carry a mutated and ineffective form of the enzyme L-gulonolactone oxidase, the fourth and last step in the ascorbate-producing machinery. This mutation likely occurred 40 to 25 million years ago (in the anthropoids lineage). The three surviving enzymes continue to produce the precursors to vitamin C, but the process is incomplete and the body then disassembles them.

In the 1960s, the Nobel-Prize-winning chemist Linus Pauling, after contact with Irwin Stone, began actively promoting vitamin C as a means to greatly improve human health and resistance to disease. His book How to Live Longer and Feel Better was a bestseller and advocated taking more than 10 grams per day orally, thus approaching the amounts released by the liver directly into the circulation in other mammals: an adult goat, a typical example of a vitamin-C-producing animal, will manufacture more than 13,000 mg of vitamin C per day in normal health and much more when stressed.[10]

Matthias Rath is a controversial German physician who worked with Pauling and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.[35][36] He is an active proponent and publicist for high dose vitamin C. Pauling's and Rath's extended theory states that deaths from scurvy in humans during the ice age, when vitamin C was scarce, selected for individuals who could repair arteries with a layer of cholesterol provided by lipoprotein(a), a lipoprotein found in vitamin C-deficient species (higher primates and guinea pigs).[37]

Genetic rationales for high doses [edit]

Four gene products are necessary to manufacture vitamin C from glucose. The loss of activity of the gene for the last step, Pseudogene ΨGULO (GLO), the terminal enzyme responsible for manufacture of vitamin C, has occurred separately in the history of several species. The loss of this enzyme activity is responsible for the inability of guinea pigs to synthesize vitamin C enzymatically, but this event happened independently of the loss in the haplorrhini suborder of primates, including humans. The remains of this non-functional gene with many mutations are, however, still present in the genome of the guinea pigs and in primates, including humans.[38][39] GLO activity has also been lost in all major families of bats, regardless of diet.[40] In addition, the function of GLO appears to have been lost several times, and possibly reacquired, in several lines of passerine birds, where ability to make vitamin C varies from species to species.[41]

Loss of GLO activity in the primate order supposedly occurred about 63 million years ago, at about the time it split into the suborders haplorrhini (which lost the enzyme activity) and the more primitive strepsirrhini (which retained it). The haplorrhini ("simple nosed") primates, which cannot make vitamin C enzymatically, include the tarsiers and the simians (apes, monkeys and humans). The suborder strepsirrhini (bent or wet-nosed prosimians), which are still able to make vitamin C enzymatically, include lorises, galagos, pottos, and to some extent, lemurs.[42]

Stone[43] and Pauling[44] calculated, based on the diet of primates[45] (similar to what our common ancestors are likely to have consumed when the gene mutated), that the optimum daily requirement of vitamin C is around 2,300 milligrams for a human requiring 2,500 kcal a day.

Pauling criticized the established US Recommended Daily Allowance, pointing out that it is based on the known quantities that will prevent acute scurvy but is not necessarily the dosage for optimal health.[46]

Regulation of vitamin C [edit]

Regulation [edit]

There are regulations in most countries which limit the claims on the treatment of disease that can be placed on food, drug, and nutrient product labels. Regulations include:

  • Claims of therapeutic effect with respect to the treatment of any medical condition or disease are prohibited by the Food and Drug Administration in the USA, and by the corresponding regulatory agencies in other countries, unless the substance has gone through a well established clinical trial with neutral oversight.
  • In the United States, the following notice is mandatory on food, drug, and nutrient product labels which make health claims: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.[47]

Advocacy arguments [edit]

Vitamin C advocates argue that there is a large body of scientific evidence that the vitamin has a wide range of health and therapeutic benefits but that this belief is rejected by current science and medical research.[48]

There is some evidence regarding the applications and efficacy of vitamin C, but recommended governmental agency doses and frequency of intake have remained relatively fixed. This has led some researchers to challenge the recommendations. In 2003, Steve Hickey and Hilary Roberts of the Manchester Metropolitan University published a fundamental criticism of the approach taken to fix the nutritional requirement of vitamin C. In 2004, they again argued that the RDA, which is based on blood plasma and white blood cell saturation data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was based on flawed data.[49] According to these authors, the doses required to achieve blood, tissue and body "saturation" are much larger than previously believed.

See also [edit]

References [edit]

  1. ^ Bad Science, Ben Goldacre
  2. ^ Trick Or Treatment, Simon Singh & Edzard Ernst
  3. ^ The Dark Side Of Linus Pauling's Legacy, Quackwatch
  4. ^ David Gorski, Science Based Medicine, 18 Aug 2008
  5. ^ "Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition, 2nd edition" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2004. Retrieved 2007-02-20. 
  6. ^ Gropper SS, Smith JL, Grodd JL (2004). Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism (4th ed.). Belmont, CA. USA: Thomson Wadsworth. pp. 260–275. 
  7. ^ Yeom CH, Jung GC, Song KJ (2007). "Changes of terminal cancer patients' health-related quality of life after high dose vitamin C administration". J. Korean Med. Sci. 22 (1): 7–11. doi:10.3346/jkms.2007.22.1.7. PMC 2693571. PMID 17297243. Retrieved 2007-08-03. 
  8. ^ "Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid)". University of Maryland Medical Center. April 2002. Retrieved 2007-02-19. 
  9. ^ Pauling L (1970). "Evolution and the need for ascorbic acid". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 67 (4): 1643–1648. Bibcode:1970PNAS...67.1643P. doi:10.1073/pnas.67.4.1643. PMC 283405. PMID 5275366. Retrieved 2007-07-27. 
  10. ^ a b Stone, I. (1979). "Homo sapiens ascorbicus, a biochemically corrected robust human mutant". Medical hypotheses 5 (6): 711–721. doi:10.1016/0306-9877(79)90093-8. PMID 491997.  edit
  11. ^ Hemilä, H; Chalker E, Douglas B (2000). "Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3 (2): CD000980. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000980. ISSN 1464-780X. PMID 10796569. 
  12. ^ Houston, M. C. (2010). "The role of cellular micronutrient analysis, nutraceuticals, vitamins, antioxidants and minerals in the prevention and treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease". Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease 4 (3): 165. doi:10.1177/1753944710368205. PMID 20400494.  edit
  13. ^ Cameron E, Pauling L (October 1976). "Supplemental ascorbate in the supportive treatment of cancer: Prolongation of survival times in terminal human cancer". PNAS 73 (10): 3685–3689. Bibcode:1976PNAS...73.3685C. doi:10.1073/pnas.73.10.3685. PMC 431183. PMID 1068480. 
  14. ^ a b c "Vitamin C". American Cancer Society. 
  15. ^ a b Cabanillas, F (2010). "Vitamin C and cancer: what can we conclude--1,609 patients and 33 years later?". Puerto Rico health sciences journal 29 (3): 215–7. PMID 20799507.  edit
  16. ^ a b c d Verrax J, Calderon PB (December 2008). "The controversial place of vitamin C in cancer treatment". Biochem. Pharmacol. 76 (12): 1644–52. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2008.09.024. PMID 18938145. 
  17. ^ Giannini AJ, Loiselle RH, DiMarzio LR, Giannini MC (September 1987). "Augmentation of haloperidol by ascorbic acid in phencyclidine intoxication". The American Journal of Psychiatry 144 (9): 1207–1209. PMID 3631319. 
  18. ^ a b Berger MM (October 2006). "Antioxidant micronutrients in major trauma and burns: evidence and practice". Nutr Clin Pract 21 (5): 438–49. PMID 16998143. 
  19. ^ Greenhalgh DG (2007). "Burn resuscitation". J Burn Care Res 28 (4): 555–65. PMID 17665515. 
  20. ^ a b Pham TN, Cancio LC, Gibran NS (2008). "American Burn Association practice guidelines burn shock resuscitation". J Burn Care Res 29 (1): 257–66. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e31815f3876. PMID 18182930. 
  21. ^ Smith DC (March 1990). "'Cured' myasthenia". Anaesthesia 45 (3): 252. PMID 1970713. 
  22. ^ Paul Zollinger. Vitamin C for Prevention of CRPS-I in Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery. ISBN 9789088900099. 
  23. ^ Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Vitamin C on Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Extremity Trauma and Surgery—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. PMID 22985495. 
  24. ^ Rees; Kelsey, Richards. "Acute haemolysis induced by high dose ascorbic acid in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency". British Medical Journal 306: 841–2. PMC 1677333. PMID 8490379. 
  25. ^ Dietary reference intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and carotenoids: a report of the Panel on Dietary Antioxidants and Related Compounds, Subcommittees on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients and of Interpretation and Use of Dietary Reference Intakes, and the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press. 2000. pp. 156–161. ISBN 0-309-06949-1. 
  26. ^ Nankivell, BJ; Murali KM (2008). "Renal failure from vitamin C after transplantation". NEJM 358 (4): e4. doi:10.1056/NEJMicm070984. PMID 18216350. 
  27. ^ "Safety (MSDS) data for ascorbic acid". Oxford University. October 9, 2005. Retrieved 2007-02-21. 
  28. ^ E. B. Henry, A. Carswell, A. Wirz, V. Fyffe & K. E. L. Mccoll (September 2005). "Proton pump inhibitors reduce the bioavailability of dietary vitamin C". Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. Retrieved 2007-02-21. 
  29. ^ C. Mowat, A. Carswell, A. Wirz, K.E. McColl (April 1999). "Omeprazole and dietary nitrate independently affect levels of vitamin C and nitrite in gastric juice.". Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. Retrieved 2011-02-14. 
  30. ^ Loh HS, Watters K & Wilson CW (1 November 1973). "The Effects of Aspirin on the Metabolic Availability of Ascorbic Acid in Human Beings". J Clin Pharmacol 13 (11): 480–486. PMID 4490672. 
  31. ^ Basu TK (1982). "Vitamin C-aspirin interactions". Int J Vitam Nutr Res Suppl 23: 83–90. PMID 6811490. 
  32. ^ Ioannides C, Stone AN, Breacker PJ & Basu TK (1982). "Impairment of absorption of ascorbic acid following ingestion of aspirin in guinea pigs". Biochem Pharmacol 31 (24): 4035–4038. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(82)90652-9. PMID 6818974. 
  33. ^ Levy, Thomas (2011). Primal Panacea. MedFox Publishing. p. 352. ISBN 0983772800. 
  34. ^ Harri Hemilä (January 2006). "Do vitamins C and E affect respiratory infections?" (PDF). University of Helsinki. Retrieved 2007-02-21. 
  35. ^ Rath M, Pauling L (1990). "Immunological evidence for the accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in the atherosclerotic lesion of the hypoascorbemic guinea pig". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87 (23): 9388–9390. Bibcode:1990PNAS...87.9388R. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.23.9388. PMC 55170. PMID 2147514. 
  36. ^ Rath M, Pauling L (1990). "Hypothesis: lipoprotein(a) is a surrogate for ascorbate". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87 (16): 6204–6207. Bibcode:1990PNAS...87.6204R. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.16.6204. PMC 54501. PMID 2143582. 
  37. ^ Rath M, Pauling L (1992). "A unified theory of human cardiovascular disease leading the way to the abolition of this disease as a cause for human mortality". Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine 7 (1): 5–15. 
  38. ^ Nishikimi M, Kawai T, Yagi K (25 October 1992). "Guinea pigs possess a highly mutated gene for L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase, the key enzyme for L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis missing in this species". J Biol Chem 267 (30): 21967–21972. PMID 1400507. 
  39. ^ Ohta Y, Nishikimi M (October 1999). "Random nucleotide substitutions in primate nonfunctional gene for L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase, the missing enzyme in L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis". Biochim Biophys Acta 1472 (1-2): 408–411. doi:10.1016/S0304-4165(99)00123-3. PMID 10572964. 
  40. ^ A trace of GLO was detected in only 1 of 34 bat species tested, across the range of 6 families of bats tested: See Jenness R, Birney E, Ayaz K (1980). "Variation of L-gulonolactone oxidase activity in placental mammals". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 67B: 195–204.  Earlier reports of only fruit bats being deficient were based on smaller samples.
  41. ^ Carlos Martinez del Rio (July 1997). "Can passerines synthesize vitamin C?". The Auk. 
  42. ^ Pollock JI, Mullin RJ (May 1987). "Vitamin C biosynthesis in prosimians: evidence for the anthropoid affinity of Tarsius". Am J Phys Anthropol 73 (1): 65–70. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330730106. PMID 3113259. 
  43. ^ Stone, Irwin (1972). The Healing Factor: Vitamin C Against Disease. Grosset and Dunlap. ISBN 0-448-11693-6. OCLC 3967737. 
  44. ^ Pauling, Linus (1970). "Evolution and the need for ascorbic acid". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 67 (4): 1643–1648. Bibcode:1970PNAS...67.1643P. doi:10.1073/pnas.67.4.1643. PMC 283405. PMID 5275366. 
  45. ^ Milton K (2003). "Micronutrient intakes of wild primates: are humans different?" (PDF). Comp Biochem Physiol a Mol Integr Physiol 136 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00084-9. PMID 14527629. 
  46. ^ Pauling, Linus (1986). How to Live Longer and Feel Better. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 0-380-70289-4. OCLC 154663991 15690499. 
  47. ^ "Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994". 
  48. ^ Richards E (November 1988). "The Politics of Therapeutic Evaluation: The Vitamin C and Cancer Controversy". Social Studies of Science 18 (4): 653–701. doi:10.1177/030631288018004004. JSTOR 284966. 
  49. ^ Hickey S, Roberts H (September 2005). "Misleading information on the properties of vitamin C". PLoS Med. 2 (9): e307; author reply e309. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020307. PMC 1236801. PMID 16173838. 

External links [edit]