Biofuel: Difference between revisions
Jakeschode (talk | contribs) ←Replaced content with 'I LIke Wikipedia :)' |
m Reverted edits by Jakeschode (talk) to last version by MER-C |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Redirect|Bio-energy|the term bio-energy in the context of non-mechanist philosophy or alternative medicine|Vitalism}} |
|||
I LIke Wikipedia :) |
|||
{{dablink|For articles on specific fuels used in vehicles, see [[Biogas]], [[Bioethanol]], [[Biobutanol]], [[Biodiesel]], [[Straight vegetable oil]], and [[Wood gas generator]].}} |
|||
[[Image:Sugar cane leaves.jpg|thumb|[[Sugar cane]] can be used as a biofuel or food.]] |
|||
{{Renewable energy sources}} |
|||
'''Biofuel''' (if cultivated, then also called ''agrofuel'' or ''agrifuel'') can be broadly defined as solid, liquid, or gas [[fuel]] consisting of, or derived from recently dead [[biological material]], most commonly [[plants]]. This distinguishes it from [[fossil fuel]], which is derived from long dead biological material. |
|||
Biofuel can be theoretically produced from any ([[biology|biological]]) carbon source. The most common by far is [[photosynthesis|photosynthetic]] [[plant]]s that capture [[solar energy]]. Many different plants and plant-derived materials are used for biofuel manufacture. |
|||
Biofuels are used globally and biofuel industries are expanding in Europe, Asia and the Americas. The most common use for biofuels is as liquid fuels for automotive transport. The use of renewable biofuels provides increased independence from petroleum and enhances [[Energy security and renewable technology|energy security]].<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.epa.gov/smartway/growandgo/documents/faq.htm#i_05 |title= SmartWay Grow & Go }}</ref> |
|||
There are various current issues with biofuel production and use, which are presently being discussed in the popular media and scientific journals. These include: the effect of moderating [[oil prices]], the "[[food vs fuel]]" debate, [[carbon emissions]] levels, [[sustainable biofuel]] production, [[deforestation]] and [[soil erosion]], impact on [[water resources]], [[human rights]] issues, [[poverty reduction]] potential, biofuel prices, energy balance and efficiency, and centralised versus decentralised production models. |
|||
One of the greatest technical challenges is to develop ways to convert biomass energy specifically to [[#Liquid fuels for transportation|liquid fuels for transportation]]. To achieve this, the two most common strategies are: |
|||
*1. To grow sugar crops ([[sugar cane]], and [[sugar beet]]), or [[starch]] ([[corn]]/[[maize]]), and then use [[yeast]] fermentation to produce [[ethanol]] (ethyl alcohol). |
|||
*2. To grow plants that (naturally) produce oils, such as [[oil palm]], [[soybean]], [[algae]], or [[jatropha]]. When these oils are heated, their [[viscosity]] is reduced, and they can be burned directly in a [[diesel engine]], or the oils can be chemically processed to produce fuels such as [[biodiesel]]. |
|||
Wood and its byproducts can be converted into biofuels such as [[woodgas]], [[methanol]] or [[ethanol fuel]]. Some researchers are working to improve these processes. |
|||
==History and policy== |
|||
Humans have used biomass fuels in the form of solid biofuels for heating and cooking since the discovery of fire. Following the discovery of electricity, it became possible to use biofuels to generate electrical power as well. However, the discovery and use of [[fossil fuels]]: [[coal]], [[Natural gas|gas]] and [[Petroleum|oil]], have dramatically reduced the amount of biomass fuel used in the developed world for transport, heat and power. |
|||
Liquid biofuels have been used since the early days of the [[automobile]] industry. [[Nikolaus August Otto]], the German inventor of the [[internal combustion engine]], conceived his invention to run on [[ethanol]].{{Fact|date=January 2008}} [[Rudolf Diesel]], the German inventor of the [[Diesel engine]], designed it to run on [[peanut oil]], and [[Henry Ford]] originally designed the [[Ford Model T]], a car produced from 1903 to 1926, to run completely on hemp derived biofuel.<ref> [http://freetheplant.net/ freetheplant.net]</ref><ref>[http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/2007-10/biofuels/biofuels-p2.html National Geographic, ''Green Dreams'', Oct 2007]</ref> However, when large [[supply|supplies]] of [[crude oil]] were discovered in [[Pennsylvania]] and [[Texas]], [[petroleum]] based fuels became inexpensive, and soon were widely used. Cars and trucks began using fuels derived from [[mineral oil]]/[[petroleum]]: [[gasoline]]/[[petrol]] or [[diesel]]. |
|||
Nevertheless, before [[World War II]], and during the high demand wartime period, biofuels were valued as a strategic alternative to imported oil. Wartime Germany experienced extreme oil shortages, and many energy innovations resulted. This include the powering of some of its vehicles using a blend of gasoline with alcohol fermented from potatoes, called ''Reichskraftsprit''.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} In Britain, [[grain alcohol]] was blended with [[petrol]] by the [[Distillers Company Limited]] under the name ''Discol'', and marketed through [[Esso]]'s affiliate Cleveland.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} |
|||
During the peacetime post-war period, inexpensive oil from the [[Middle East]] contributed in part to the lessened economic and geopolitical interest in biofuels. Then in 1973 and 1979, geopolitical conflict in the Middle East caused [[OPEC]] to cut exports, and non-OPEC nations experienced a very large decrease in their oil [[supply]]. This "[[energy crisis]]" resulted in severe shortages, and a sharp increase in high [[demand]] oil-based products, notably [[petrol]]/[[gasoline]]. There was also increased interest from governments and academics in energy issues and biofuels. Throughout history, the fluctuations of [[supply and demand]], [[energy policy]], [[military]] conflict, and the environmental impacts, have all contributed to a highly complex and volatile market for energy and fuel. |
|||
In the year 2000 and beyond, renewed interest in biofuels has been seen. The drivers for biofuel [[research and development]] include rising oil prices, concerns over the potential [[oil peak]], [[greenhouse gas emission]]s (causing [[global warming]] and [[climate change]]), rural development interests, and instability in the Middle East. |
|||
==Biomass== |
|||
{{main|Biomass}} |
|||
Biomass is material derived from recently living [[organism]]s. This includes plants, animals and their by-products. For example, manure, garden waste and crop residues are all sources of biomass. It is a [[renewable energy]] source based on the [[carbon cycle]], unlike other [[natural resource]]s such as [[petroleum]], [[coal]], and [[nuclear reactor|nuclear]] fuels. |
|||
Animal waste is a persistent and unavoidable pollutant produced primarily by the animals housed in industrial sized farms. Researchers from Washington University have figured out a way to turn manure into [[magic]]. In April 2008 with the help of imaging technology they noticed that vigorous mixing helps microorganisms turn farm waste into alternative energy. Providing farmers with a simple way to treat their waste and convert it into energy.<ref> [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080417/ap_on_bi_ge/farm_scene_waste_as_fuel;_ylt=AkqcOw73x0nKfqJCs2.iF1Ss0NUE]</ref> |
|||
There are also [[agriculture|agricultural]] products specifically grown for biofuel production include [[maize|corn]], [[switchgrass]], and [[soybeans]], primarily in the United States; [[rapeseed]], [[wheat]] and [[sugar beet]] primarily in Europe; [[sugar cane]] in Brazil; [[palm oil]] and [[miscanthus]] in South-East Asia; [[sorghum]] and [[cassava]] in China; and [[jatropha]] in India. [[Hemp]] has also been proven to work as a biofuel. [[Biodegradable]] outputs from industry, agriculture, forestry and households can be used for biofuel production, either using [[anaerobic digestion]] to produce [[biogas]], or using [[second generation biofuels]]; examples include straw, timber, manure, rice husks, sewage, and food waste. The use of biomass fuels can therefore contribute to waste management as well as fuel security and help to prevent climate change, though alone they are not a comprehensive solution to these problems. |
|||
==Bioenergy from waste== |
|||
Using waste biomass to produce energy can reduce the use of fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduce pollution and waste management problems. A recent publication by the European Union highlighted the potential for waste-derived bioenergy to contribute to the reduction of global warming. The report concluded that 19 million tons of oil equivalent is available from biomass by 2020, 46% from bio-wastes: municipal solid waste (MSW), agricultural residues, farm waste and other biodegradable waste streams.<ref>European Environment Agency (2006) How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? EEA Report no. 7</ref><ref>Marshall, A. T. (2007) Bioenergy from Waste: A Growing Source of Power, [http://www.waste-management-world-magazine ''Waste Management World Magazine''], April, p34-37</ref> |
|||
Landfill sites generate gases as the waste buried in them undergoes [[anaerobic digestion]]. These gases are known collectively as [[landfill gas]]. This can be burned and is considered a source of renewable energy, even though landfill disposal are often non-sustainable. [Landfill gas (LFG)] can be burned either directly for heat or to generate [[electric power|electricity]] for public consumption. Landfill gas contains approximately 50 percent methane, the same gas that is found in [[natural gas]].{{Fact|date=January 2008}} |
|||
If landfill gas is not harvested, it escapes into the atmosphere: this is not desirable because methane is a greenhouse gas, with more [[global warming potential]] than carbon dioxide.<ref name="IPCC2001"> [http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/248.htm IPCC Third Assessment Report], accessed August 31, 2007.</ref><ref name="EPAGWP"> [http://www.epa.gov/nonco2/econ-inv/table.html Non-CO2 Gases Economic Analysis and Inventory: Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes], U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed August 31, 2007</ref> Over a time span of 100 years, methane has a global warming potential of 23 relative to '''CO<sub>2</sub >'''.<ref name="IPCC2001" /> Therefore, during this time, one ton of methane produces the same greenhouse gas (GHG) effect as 23 tons of '''CO<sub>2</sub >'''.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} When methane burns the formula is '''CH<sub>4</sub > + 2O<sub>2</sub > = CO<sub>2</sub > + 2H<sub>2</sub >O''' So by harvesting and burning landfill gas, its global warming potential is reduced a factor of 23, in addition to providing energy for [[Combined heat and power|heat and power]]. |
|||
Frank Keppler and Thomas Rockmann discovered that living plants also produce methane '''CH<sub>4</sub >'''.<ref>{{cite journal |
|||
| journal = Nature |
|||
| volume = 439 |
|||
| pages = 187-191 |
|||
| year = 2006 |
|||
| doi = 10.1038/nature04420 |
|||
| title = Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions |
|||
| author = Frank Keppler, John T. G. Hamilton, Marc Bra, and Thomas Röckmann}}</ref> The amount of methane produced by living plants is 10 to 100 times greater than that produced by dead plants (in an aerobic environment) {{Fact|date=January 2008}} but does not increase global warming because of the [[carbon cycle]].{{Fact|date=January 2008}} |
|||
[[Anaerobic digestion]] can be used as a distinct waste management strategy to reduce the amount of waste sent to landfill and generate methane, or [[biogas]]. Any form of biomass can be used in [[anaerobic digestion]] and will break down to produce [[methane]], which can be harvested and burned to generate heat, power or to power certain automotive vehicles. |
|||
A 3 MW landfill power plant would power 1,900 homes.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} It would eliminate 6,000 tons per year of methane from getting into the environment.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} It would eliminate 18,000 tons per year of '''CO<sub>2</sub >''' from fossil fuel replacement.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} This is the same as removing 25,000 cars from the road,{{Fact|date=January 2008}} or planting {{convert|36000|acre|sqkm|0}} of forest,{{Fact|date=January 2008}} or not using 305,000 barrels of oil per year.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} |
|||
==Liquid fuels for transportation== |
|||
Most transportation fuels are liquids, because vehicles usually require high [[energy density]], as occurs in [[liquid]]s and [[solid]]s. Vehicles usually need high [[power density]] as can be provided most inexpensively by an [[internal combustion engine]]s. These engines require clean burning fuels, in order to keep the engine clean and minimize [[air pollution]]. The fuels that are easier to burn cleanly are typically liquids and [[gas]]es. Thus only liquids meet the requirements of being both portable and clean burning. Also, liquids can be [[pump]]ed, which means handling is easily mechanized, and thus less laborious. |
|||
== First generation biofuels == |
|||
'First-generation fuels' refer to biofuels made from [[sugar]], [[starch]], [[vegetable oil]], or [[animal fat]]s using conventional technology.<ref name="UN report"> [http://esa.un.org/un-energy/pdf/susdev.Biofuels.FAO.pdf UN biofuels report]</ref> |
|||
The most common first generation biofuels are listed below. |
|||
===Vegetable oil=== |
|||
{{main|Vegetable oil used as fuel}} |
|||
Vegetable oil can be used for either food or fuel; the quality of the oil may be lower for fuel use. Vegetable oil can be used in many older diesel engines (equipped with [[Indirect injection|indirect injection systems]]), but only in warm climates. In most cases, vegetable oil is used to manufacture biodiesel, which is compatible with most diesel engines when blended with conventional diesel fuel. [[MAN B&W Diesel]], [[Wartsila]] and [[Deutz AG]] offer engines that are compatible with straight vegetable oil. Used vegetable oil is increasingly being processed into biodiesel, and at a smaller scale, cleaned of water and particulates and used as a fuel. |
|||
===Biodiesel=== |
|||
{{main|Biodiesel|Biodiesel around the world}} |
|||
Biodiesel is the most common biofuel in Europe. It is produced from oils or fats using [[transesterification]] and is a liquid similar in composition to mineral diesel. Its chemical name is fatty acid methyl (or ethyl) ester ([[Fatty acid methyl ester|FAME]]). Oils are mixed with sodium hydroxide and methanol (or ethanol) and the chemical reaction produces biodiesel (FAME) and [[glycerol]]. 1 part glycerol is produced for every 10 parts biodiesel. |
|||
Biodiesel can be used in any [[diesel engine]] when mixed with mineral diesel. In some countries manufacturers cover their diesel engines under warranty for 100% biodiesel use, although Volkswagen Germany, for example, asks drivers to make a telephone check with the VW environmental services department before switching to 100% biodiesel (see [[Biodiesel#Use|biodiesel use]]). Many people have run their vehicles on biodiesel without problems. However, the majority of vehicle manufacturers limit their recommendations to 15% biodiesel blended with mineral diesel. In many European countries, a 5% biodiesel blend is widely used and is available at thousands of gas stations.<ref> http://www.biodiesel.de/ </ref><ref>[http://www.biodieselfillingstations.co.uk Welcome to Biodiesel Filling Stations<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
|||
In the USA, more than 80% of commercial trucks and city buses run on diesel. Therefore "the nascent U.S. market for biodiesel is growing at a staggering rate—from 25 million gallons per year in 2004 to 78 million gallons by the beginning of 2005. By the end of 2006 biodiesel production was estimated to increase fourfold to more than 1 billion gallons," energy expert [http://www.prleap.com/pr/80099/ Will Thurmond] writes in an article for the July-August 2007 issue of [http://www.wfs.org/futcontja07.htm THE FUTURIST magazine]. |
|||
===Bioalcohols=== |
|||
{{main|Alcohol fuel}} |
|||
Biologically produced [[alcohols]], most commonly [[ethanol]], and less commonly [[Propan-1-ol|propanol]] and [[butanol]], are produced by the action of [[microorganism]]s and [[enzyme]]s through fermentation of sugars or starches (easiest), or celulose (which is more difficult). [[Biobutanol]] (also called biogasoline) is often claimed to provide a direct replacement for [[gasoline]], because it can be used directly in a gasoline engine (in a similar way to biodiesel in diesel engines). |
|||
[[Butanol]] is formed by [[Clostridium acetobutylicum|ABE fermentation]] (acetone, butanol, ethanol) and experimental modifications of the process show potentially high net energy gains with butanol as the only liquid product. Butanol will produce more energy and allegedly can be burned "straight" in existing gasoline engines (without modification to the engine or car),<ref>[http://www.butanol.com/ ButylFuel,LLC Main Page<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> and is less corrosive and less water soluble than ethanol, and could be distributed via existing infrastructures. [[DuPont]] and [[BP]] are working together to help develop Butanol. |
|||
[[Ethanol fuel]] is the most common biofuel worldwide, particularly [[ethanol fuel in Brazil]]. [[Alcohol fuel]]s are produced by fermentation of sugars derived from [[wheat]], [[corn]], [[sugar beet]]s, [[sugar cane]], [[molasses]] and any sugar or starch that [[alcoholic beverage]]s can be made from (like [[potato]] and [[fruit]] waste, etc.). The [[ethanol]] production methods used are [[enzyme]] digestion (to release sugars from stored starches, [[ethanol fermentation|fermentation]] of the sugars, [[distillation]] and [[drying]]. The process requires significant energy input for heat (often unsustainable [[natural gas]] [[fossil fuel]]). |
|||
[[Cellulosic ethanol]] production uses [[non food crops]] or inedible waste products, which has less of an impact on food. [[Lignocellulose]] is the "woody" structural material of plants. This feedstock is abundant and diverse, and in some cases (like citrus peels or sawdust) it is a significant industry-specific disposal problem. |
|||
Producing [[ethanol]] from [[cellulose]] is a more difficult-and-expensive additional-step technical problem to solve. [[Ruminant]] livestock (like [[cattle]]) eat grass and then use slow enzymatic digestive processes to break it into [[glucose]] (sugar). In [[cellulosic ethanol]] laboratories, various [[experimental]] processes are being used to do the same thing, and then do the above process to make ethanol fuel. |
|||
Some scientists have expressed concern that if experimental [[recombinant DNA]] [[genetic engineering]] continues to be used to develop unprecedented [[enzyme]]s that break down wood much faster than in nature, such [[microscopic]] life forms may accidentally be released into nature, grow exponentially, be distributed by the wind, and eventually destroy the structure of all [[tree]]s, ending all Earthly life that breathes [[oxygen]] released by [[photosynthesis]] in trees{{Fact|date=February 2008}}. |
|||
Ethanol can be used in petrol engines as a replacement for [[gasoline]]; it can be mixed with gasoline to any percentage. Most existing automobile petrol engines can run on blends of up to 15% bioethanol with petroleum/gasoline. Gasoline with ethanol added has higher [[octane]], which means that your engine can typically burn hotter and more efficiently. In high altitude (thin air) locations, some states mandate a mix of gasoline and ethanol as a winter [[oxidizer]] to reduce atmospheric polloution emissions. |
|||
[[Ethanol fuel]] has less [[BTU]] energy content, which means it takes more fuel (volume and mass) to go the same distance. More-expensive premium fuels contain less, or no, ethanol. In high-compression engines, less ethanol, slower-burning premium fuel is required to avoid harmful [[pre-ignition]] (knocking). Very-expensive aviation gasoline (Avgas) is 100 octane made from 100% petroleum. The high price of zero-ethanol Avgas does not include federal-and-state road-use taxes. |
|||
Ethanol is very [[corrosive]] to fuel systems, rubber hoses-and-gaskets, [[aluminum]], and [[combustion chamber]]s. It is therefore illegal to use fuels containing alcohol in aircraft. Ethanol is incompatible with marine fiberglass fuel tanks (it makes them leak). For higher ethanol percentage blends, and 100% ethanol vehicles, engine modifications are required. |
|||
[[Corrosive]] ethanol cannot be transported in petroleum pipelines, so more-expensive over-the-road stainless-steel tank trucks increase the cost and energy consumption required to deliver ethanol to the customer at the pump. |
|||
When considering the total energy consumed by [[farm equipment]], cultivation, planting, [[fertilizers]], [[pesticides]], [[herbicides]], and [[fungicides]] made from petroleum, [[irrigation]] systems, harvesting, transport of feedstock to processing plants, [[fermentation]], [[distillation]], drying, transport to fuel terminals and retail pumps, and lower [[ethanol fuel]] energy content, '''the net energy content value added and delivered to consumers is very small'''. And, the net benefit (all things considered) does little to reduce un-[[sustainable]] imported oil and fossil fuels required to produce the ethanol.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e780d216-5fd5-11dc-b0fe-0000779fd2ac.html |
|||
| title= "OECD warns against biofuels subsidies" |
|||
|author= Andrew Bounds |
|||
|date= September 10 2007 |publisher= ''[[Financial Times]]'' |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-03-07 }} </ref> |
|||
Many car manufacturers are now producing [[flexible-fuel vehicle]]s (FFV's), which can safely run on any combination of bioethanol and petrol, up to 100% bioethanol. They dynamically sense exhaust oxygen content, and adjust the engine's computer systems, spark, and fuel injection accordingly. This adds initial cost and ongoing increased vehicle maintenance. Efficiency falls and pollution emissions increase when FFV system maintenance is needed (regardless of the 0%-to-100% ethanol mix being used), but not performed (as with all vehicles). FFV [[internal combustion engine]]s are becoming increasingly complex, as are multiple-[[propulsion]]-system FFV [[hybrid vehicles]], which impacts cost, maintenance, [[reliability]], and useful lifetime [[longevity]]. |
|||
Alcohol mixes with both petroleum and with water, so [[ethanol fuel]]s are often diluted after the drying process by absorbing environmental moisture from the atmosphere. Water in alcohol-mix fuels reduces efficiency, makes engines harder to start, causes intermittent operation (sputtering), and oxidizes aluminum ([[carburetor]]s) and steel components ([[rust]]). |
|||
Even dry ethanol has roughly one-third lower energy content per unit of volume compared to gasoline, so larger / heavier fuel tanks are required to travel the same distance, or more fuel stops are required. With large current un-[[sustainable]], non-[[scalable]] subsidies, [[ethanol fuel]] still costs much more per unit of distance traveled than current high gasoline prices.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://zfacts.com/p/436.html |
|||
| title= With only 2/3 the energy of gasoline, ethanol costs more per mile |
|||
|date= 27 Apr 2007 |publisher= zFacts.com |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-03-07 }} </ref> |
|||
[[Methanol]] is currently produced from [[natural gas]], a non-[[renewable]] [[fossil fuel]]. It can also be produced from [[biomass]] as biomethanol. The [[methanol economy]] is an interesting alternative to the [[hydrogen economy]], compared to today's hydrogen produced from [[natural gas]], but not [[hydrogen production]] directly from water and [[state-of-the-art]] clean [[solar thermal energy]] processes.<ref>[http://www.hydrogensolar.com/ Hydrogen Solar home<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
|||
===BioGas=== |
|||
{{main|biogas}} |
|||
Biogas is produced by the process of [[anaerobic digestion]] of [[organic material]] by [[anaerobe]]s. It can be produced either from biodegradable waste materials or by the use of [[energy crop]]s fed into [[anaerobic digester]]s to supplement gas yields. The solid byproduct, [[digestate]], can be used as a biofuel or a fertilizer. |
|||
Biogas contains [[methane]] and can be recovered from industrial anaerobic digesters and [[mechanical biological treatment]] systems. Landfill gas is a less clean form of biogas which is produced in [[landfill]]s through naturally occurring anaerobic digestion. If it escapes into the atmosphere it is a potent [[greenhouse gas]]. |
|||
Oils and gases can be produced from various biological wastes: |
|||
* [[Thermal depolymerization]] of waste can extract methane and other oils similar to petroleum. |
|||
* [[GreenFuel Technologies Corporation]] developed a patented bioreactor system that uses nontoxic photosynthetic algae to take in smokestacks flue gases and produce biofuels such as biodiesel, biogas and a dry fuel comparable to coal.<ref> [http://www.greenfuelonline.com/ greenfuelonline.com] </ref> |
|||
===Solid biofuels=== |
|||
Examples include wood, grass cuttings, domestic refuse, charcoal, and dried [[manure]]. |
|||
===Syngas=== |
|||
{{main|Gasification}} |
|||
[[Syngas]] is produced by the combined processes of [[pyrolysis]], combustion, and [[gasification]]. Biofuel is converted into [[carbon monoxide]] and energy by pyrolysis. A limited supply of oxygen is introduced to support combustion. Gasification converts further organic material to hydrogen and additional carbon monoxide. |
|||
The resulting gas mixture, syngas, is itself a fuel. Using the syngas is more efficient than direct combustion of the original biofuel; more of the energy contained in the fuel is extracted. |
|||
Syngas may be burned directly in internal combustion engines. The [[wood gas generator]] is a wood-fueled gasification reactor mounted on an internal combustion engine. Syngas can be used to produce [[methanol]] and [[hydrogen]], or converted via the [[Fischer-Tropsch process]] to produce a synthetic [[petroleum]] substitute. Gasification normally relies on temperatures >700°C. Lower temperature gasification is desirable when co-producing [[biochar]]. |
|||
== Second generation biofuels == |
|||
{{main|Second generation biofuels}} |
|||
Supporters of biofuels claim that a more viable solution is to increase political and industrial support for, and rapidity of, second-generation biofuel implementation from [[non food crop]]s, including [[cellulosic biofuel]]s.<ref name=2G> http://www.renewable-energy-world.com/articles/print_screen.cfm?ARTICLE_ID=308325 {{Dead link|date=March 2008}} </ref> Second-generation biofuel production processes can use a variety of [[non food crops]]. These include waste biomass, the stalks of wheat, corn, wood, and special-energy-or-biomass crops (e.g. [[Miscanthus]]). Second generation (2G) biofuels use [[biomass to liquid]] technology, including [[cellulosic biofuel]]s from [[non food crop]]s.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.usda.gov/oce/forum/2007%20Speeches/PDF%20PPT/CSomerville.pdf |
|||
| title= "Development of Cellulosic Biofuels" |
|||
| author= Chris Somerville |
|||
|date= |year= |month= |
|||
| format= [[PDF]] |
|||
| publisher= [[United States Department of Agriculture|U.S. Dept. of Agriculture]] |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-15 }} </ref> Many second generation biofuels are under development such as [[biohydrogen]], [[biomethanol]], [[2,5-Dimethylfuran|DMF]], Bio-DME, Fischer-Tropsch diesel, biohydrogen diesel, mixed alcohols and wood diesel. |
|||
== Third generation biofuels== |
|||
{{Main|Algae fuel}} |
|||
'''Algae fuel''', also called '''oilgae''' or '''third generation biofuel''', is a biofuel from [[algae]]. Algae are low-input/high-yield (30 times more energy per acre than land) [[wikt:feedstock|feedstock]]s to produce biofuels<ref name="wapo-algae">{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010303907.html |
|||
| title= "A Promising Oil Alternative: Algae Energy" |
|||
|author= Eviana Hartman |date= January 6, 2008 |work= |publisher= ''[[Washington Post]]'' |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-15 }} </ref> and algae fuel are [[biodegradable]]: |
|||
*With the higher prices of oil, there is much interest in [[algaculture]] (farming algae). |
|||
*One advantage of many biofuels over most other fuel types is that they are [[biodegradable]], and so relatively harmless to the environment if spilled.<ref> [http://www.globeco.co.uk/Bio-diesel_news_0007.html Globeco biodegradable bio-diesel] </ref><ref> [http://www.friendsofethanol.com/facts.html Friends of Ethanol.com biodegradable ethanol] </ref><ref> [http://www.energy-arizona.org/archive/200708280001_low_cost_algae_production_system_introduced.php Low Cost Algae Production System Introduced] </ref> |
|||
*The [[United States Department of Energy]] estimates that if algae fuel replaced all the petroleum fuel in the United States, it would require 15,000 square miles (38,849 [[square kilometer]]s), which is a few thousand miles larger than [[Maryland]].<ref name="wapo-algae"/> |
|||
== Biofuels by country == |
|||
Recognizing the importance of implementing bioenergy, there are international organizations such as IEA Bioenergy,<ref> [http://www.ieabioenergy.com/IEABioenergy.aspx IEA bioenergy] </ref> established in 1978 by the [[OECD]] [[International Energy Agency]] (IEA), with the aim of improving cooperation and information exchange between countries that have national programs in bioenergy research, development and deployment. The [[United Nations|U.N.]] International Biofuels Forum is formed by [[Brazil]], [[China]], [[India]], [[South Africa]], the [[United States]] and the [[European Commission]].<ref> {{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.un.org/News/briefings/docs/2007/070302_Biofuels.doc.htm |
|||
| title= Press Conference Launching International Biofuels Forum |
|||
| date= 2 March 2007 | publisher= [[United Nations]] Department of Public Information |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-15 }} </ref> The world leaders in biofuel development and use are Brazil, United States, France, Sweden and Germany. |
|||
{{Seealso|Biodiesel around the world}} |
|||
=== China === |
|||
In [[China]], the government is making E10 blends mandatory in five provinces that account for 16% of the nation's passenger cars. In Southeast Asia, [[Thailand]] has mandated an ambitious 10% ethanol mix in gasoline starting in 2007. For similar reasons, the palm oil industry plans to supply an increasing portion of national diesel fuel requirements in [[Malaysia]] and [[Indonesia]].{{Fact|date=January 2008}} In [[Canada]], the government aims for 45% of the country’s gasoline consumption to contain 10% ethanol by 2010. |
|||
===India=== |
|||
{{Main|Biofuels in India}} |
|||
In India, a bioethanol program calls for E5 blends throughout most of the country targeting to raise this requirement to E10 and then E20. |
|||
Maneater |
|||
=== Europe === |
|||
The [[European Union]] in its [[biofuels directive]] (updated 2006) has set the goal that for 2010 that each member state should achieve at least 5.75% biofuel usage of all used traffic fuel. By 2020 the figure should be 10%. As of January 2008 these aims are being reconsidered in light of certain environmental and social concerns associated with biofuels such as rising food prices and deforestation.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7186380.stm |
|||
| title= "EU rethinks biofuels guidelines" |
|||
|author= Roger Harrabin |date= 14 January 2008 |publisher= ''[[BBC News]]'' |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= |accessmonthday= |accessdaymonth= |accessyear= }} </ref> |
|||
====France==== |
|||
[[France]] is the second largest biofuel consumer among the EU States in 2006. According to the Ministry of Industry, France's consumption increased by 62.7% to reach 682,000 [[Tonne of oil equivalent|toe]] (i.e. 1.6% of French fuel consumption). Biodiesel represents the largest share of this (78%, far ahead of bioethanol with 22%). The unquestionable biodiesel leader in Europe is the French company [[Diester Industrie]]. In bioethanol, the French [[agro industry|agro-industrial]] group Téréos is increasing its production capacities. Germany itself remained the largest European biofuel consumer, with a consumption estimate of 2.8 million tons of biodiesel (equivalent to 2,408,000 toe), 0.71 million ton of vegetable oil (628.492 toe) and 0.48 million ton of bioethanol (307,200 toe). |
|||
====Germany==== |
|||
The biggest biodiesel German company is [[ADM Oelmühle Hamburg AG]], which is a subsidiary of the American group [[Archer Daniels Midland Company]]. Among the other large German producers, [[MUW]] (Mitteldeutsche Umesterungswerke GmbH & Co KG) and EOP Biodiesel AG. A major contender in terms of bioethanol production is the German sugar corporation, [[Südzucker]].<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.checkbiotech.org/green_News_Biofuels.aspx?infoId=15225 |
|||
| title= EU biofuels barometer: Germany & France in the lead |
|||
|author= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |
|||
| date= July 30, 2007 |work= |publisher= |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-15 }} </ref> |
|||
====Spain==== |
|||
The Spanish group [[Abengoa]], via its American subsidiary Abengoa Bioenergy, is the European leader in production of bioethanol. |
|||
====Sweden==== |
|||
{{Main|Biofuel in Sweden}} |
|||
The government in Sweden has together with BIL Sweden, the national association for the automobile industry, that are the automakers in Sweden started the work to end oil dependency. One-fifth of cars in Stockholm can run on alternative fuels, mostly [[ethanol fuel]]. Also [[Stockholm]] will introduce a fleet of Swedish-made hybrid ethanol-electric buses. In 2005, [[oil phase-out in Sweden]] by 2020 was announced.<ref name='swegov2031'>{{cite web | url=http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/2031/a/67096 |
|||
|title=Making Sweden an OIL-FREE Society |author=Prime Minister's Office Commission on Oil Independence |
|||
|accessdate=2007-02-13}} </ref> |
|||
====United Kingdom==== |
|||
In the [[United Kingdom]] the [[Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation]] (RTFO) (announced 2005) is the requirement that by 2010 5% of all road vehicle fuel is renewable. In 2008 a critical report by the [[Royal Society]] stated ''that biofuels risk failing to deliver significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from transport and could even be environmentally damaging unless the Government puts the right policies in place''.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7187361.stm |
|||
| title= "Biofuels 'are not a magic bullet'" |
|||
|author= Richard Black |
|||
|date= 14 January 2008 |work= |publisher= ''[[BBC News]]'' |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-15 }} </ref><ref> {{cite web |
|||
| url= http://royalsociety.org/document.asp?latest=1&id=7366 |
|||
| title= "Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges" |
|||
|author= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |
|||
| date= 14 Jan 2008 |work= |publisher= [[The Royal Society]] |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-15 }} </ref> |
|||
=== Brazil === |
|||
{{Main|Biofuel in Brazil}} |
|||
In '''Brazil''', the government hopes to build on the success of the Proálcool ethanol program by expanding the production of biodiesel which must contain 2% biodiesel by 2008, increasing to 5% by 2013. |
|||
===Colombia=== |
|||
[[Colombia]] mandates the use of 10% ethanol in all gasoline sold in cities with populations exceeding 500,000.<ref>Press release from the Presidencia De La República de Colombia [http://www.presidencia.gov.co/prensa_new/sne/2003/agosto/26/16262003.htm "COLOMBIA SE ALISTA PARA ENTRAR A LA ERA DEL ETANOL"]</ref> In [[Venezuela]], the state oil company is supporting the construction of 15 sugar cane distilleries over the next five years, as the government introduces a E10 (10% ethanol) blending mandate.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} |
|||
=== USA === |
|||
{{Main|Biofuel in the United States}} |
|||
In 2006, the [[United States]] president [[George W. Bush]] said in a [[2006 State of the Union address#Energy|State of the Union]] speech that the US is "addicted to oil" and should replace 75% of imported oil by 2025 by alternative sources of energy including biofuels. |
|||
Essentially all of the [[ethanol fuel]] in the US is produced from [[corn]]. Corn is a very energy intensive crop, which requires one unit of fossil-fuel energy to create just 0.9 to 1.3 energy units of ethanol.<ref>[[ethanol fuel]]</ref> A senior member of the [[House Energy and Commerce Committee]] Congressman [[Fred Upton]] has introduced legislation to use at least E10 fuel by 2012 in all cars in the USA. |
|||
The 2007-12-19 U.S. [[Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007]] requires American “fuel producers to use at least 36 billion gallons of biofuel in 2022. This is nearly a fivefold increase over current levels.”<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/12/20071219-6.html | title= Bush Signs Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007}}</ref> This is causing a significant agricultural resource shift away from food production to biofuels. American food exports have decreased (increasing grain prices worldwide), and US food imports have increased significantly. |
|||
Most biofuels are not currently cost-effective without significant subsidies. "America's ethanol program is a product of government subsidies. There are more than 200 different kinds, as well as a 54 cents-a-gallon tariff on imported ethanol. This prices Brazilian ethanol out of an otherwise competitive market. Brazil makes ethanol from sugarcane rather than corn (maize), which has a better [[EROEI]]. Federal subsidies alone cost $7 billion a year (equal to around $1.90 a gallon)."<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10250420 | title= Food Prices: Cheap No More}}</ref> |
|||
General Motors is starting a project to produce [[E85 fuel]] from [[cellulosic ethanol|cellulose ethanol]] for a projected cost of $1 a gallon. This is optimistic however, because $1/gal equates to $10/MBTU which is comparable to [[woodchips]] at $7/MBTU or [[cord wood]] at $6-$12/MBTU, and this does not account for conversion losses and plant operating and capital costs which are significant. The raw materials can be as simple as corn stalks and scrap petroleum-based vehicle tires,<ref>''G.M. Buys Stake in Ethanol Made From Waste'' By MATTHEW L. WALD Published: January 14, 2008 [[New York Times]] [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/business/14gm.html?ei=5070&en=8461e0f658455111&ex=1200978000&adxnnl=1&emc=eta1&adxnnlx=1200428791-KwYo2SIqRNjzFuH/Aw1/3g Link]</ref> but used tires are an expensive feedstock with other more-valuable uses. GM has over 4 million E85 cars on the road now, and by 2012 half of the production cars for the U.S. will be capable of running on E85 fuel, however by 2012 the supply of ethanol will not even be close to supplying this much E85. Coskata Inc. is building two new plants for the ethanol fuel. Theoretically, the process is claimed to be five times more energy efficient than corn based ethanol, however it is still in development and has not been proven to be cost effective in a free market. |
|||
The greenhouse gas emissions are reduced by 86% for cellulose compared to corn’s 29% reduction.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} |
|||
=== Biofuels in developing countries === |
|||
Biofuel industries are becoming established in many developing countries. Many developing countries have extensive biomass resources that are becoming more valuable as demand for biomass and biofuels increases. The approaches to biofuel development in different parts of the world varies. Countries such as India and China are developing both bioethanol and biodiesel programs. India is extending plantations of [[jatropha]], an oil-producing tree that is used in biodiesel production. The Indian sugar ethanol program sets a target of 5% bioethanol incorporation into transport fuel.<ref> [http://www.ethanolindia.net/ethanol_govt.html Ethanol India website] </ref> China is a major bioethanol producer and aims to incorporate 15% bioethanol into transport fuels by 2010. Costs of biofuel promotion programs can be very high, though.<ref>See Jörg Peters and Sascha Thielmann (2008) Promoting Biofuels: Implications for Developing Countries, Ruhr Economic Papers #38 ([www.rwi-essen.de] for download)</ref> |
|||
Amongst rural populations in developing countries, biomass provides the majority of fuel for heat and cooking. Wood, animal dung and crop residues are commonly burned. Figures from the International Energy Agency show that biomass energy provides around 30% of the total primary energy supply in developing countries; over 2 billion people depend on biomass fuels as their primary energy source.<ref> [http://pdf.wri.org/page_forests_008_woodfuels.pdf world resources institute document on wood fuels] (PDF) </ref> |
|||
The use of biomass fuels for cooking indoors is a source of health problems and pollution. 1.3 million deaths were attributed to the use of biomass fuels with inadequate ventilation by the [[International Energy Agency]] in its World Energy Outlook 2006. Proposed solutions include improved stoves and alternative fuels. However, fuels are easily damaged, and alternative fuels tend to be expensive. Very low cost, fuel efficient, low pollution biomass stove designs have existed since 1980 or earlier.<ref>Scientific American</ref> Issues are a lack of education, distribution, excess corruption, and very low levels of foreign aid. People in [[developing countries]] are often unable to afford these solutions without assistance or financing such as [[microloan]]s. Organizations such as [[Intermediate Technology Development Group]] work to make improved facilities for biofuel use and better alternatives accessible to those who cannot get them. |
|||
==Current issues in biofuel production and use== |
|||
Biofuels are proposed as having such benefits as: reduction of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions, reduction of [[fossil fuel]] use, increased national [[energy security]], increased [[rural development]] and a sustainable fuel supply for the future. |
|||
However, biofuel production is questioned from a number of angles. The chairman of the [[International Panel on Climate Change]], [[Rajendra Pachauri]], notably observed in March 2008 that questions arise on the emissions implications of that route, and that biofuel production has clearly raised prices of corn, with an overall implication for food security. <ref> [http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L26549810.htm] </ref> <ref> [http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=428913] </ref> |
|||
Biofuels are also seen as having limitations. The feedstocks for biofuel production must be replaced rapidly and biofuel production processes must be designed and implemented so as to supply the maximum amount of fuel at the cheapest cost, while providing maximum environmental benefits. Broadly speaking, first generation biofuel production processes cannot supply us with more than a few percent of our energy requirements sustainably. The reasons for this are described below. Second generation processes can supply us with more biofuel, with better environmental gains. The major barrier to the development of second generation biofuel processes is their capital cost: establishing second generation biodiesel plants has been estimated at €500million.<ref> [http://www.nnfcc.co.uk Nexant Chem Systems study] </ref> |
|||
Recently, an inflexion point about advantages/disadvantages of biofuels seems to be gaining momentum. The March 27, 2008 [[TIME magazine]] cover features the subject under the title "The Clean Energy Myth": |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
Politicians and Big Business are pushing biofuels like corn-based ethanol as alternatives to oil. All they’re really doing is driving up world food prices, helping to destroy the Amazon jungle, and making global warming worse.<ref>Grunwald, Michael: ‘’The Clean Energy Scam’’ TIME Magazine. Mar. 27, 2008. [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1725975,00.html]</ref> |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
===Oil price moderation=== |
|||
The [[International Energy Agency]]'s ''World Energy Outlook 2006'' concludes that rising oil demand, if left unchecked, |
|||
would accentuate the consuming countries' vulnerability to a severe supply disruption and resulting price shock. Renewable biofuels for transport represent a key source of diversification from [[petroleum products]].<ref name=IEA>[http://www.iea.org/textbase/papers/2007/so_contribution.pdf Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security]</ref> |
|||
Biofuels offer the prospect of real market competition and oil price moderation. According to the [[Wall Street Journal]], crude oil would be trading 15 per cent higher and gasoline would be as much as 25 per cent more expensive, if it were not for biofuels. A healthy supply of alternative energy sources will help to combat gasoline price spikes.<ref>[http://www.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=e08c8e19-4a95-491c-9386-d30afeab5cdf&sponsor= Biofuels are part of the solution]</ref><ref>[http://www.climateark.org/shared/reader/welcome.aspx?linkid=95429 As Biofuels Catch On, Next Task Is to Deal With Environmental, Economic Impact]</ref> |
|||
=== Rising food prices — the "food vs. fuel" debate=== |
|||
{{main|food vs fuel}} |
|||
This topic is internationally controversial. Prices on a number of food types used for biofuel have doubled in the last couple years. There are those that say biofuel is not the main cause. |
|||
Some say the problem is a result of government actions to support biofuels. Others say it is just due to oil price increases. The impact of food price increases is greatest on poorer countries.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/caribbean/news/story/2007/11/071101_oxfambiofuels.shtml |
|||
| title= "NGO has biofuel concerns" |
|||
|date= 01 November, 2007 |work= |publisher= ''[[BBC News]]'' |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-20 }} </ref> Some have called for a freeze on biofuels. Some have called for more funding of second generation biofuels which should not compete with food production so much.<ref name=bourne>''Green Dreams'' J.K. Bourne JR, R. Clark, ''[[National Geographic Magazine]]'', October 2007 p. 41, [http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/2007-10/biofuels/biofuels-interactive.html Article] </ref><ref> {{cite web |url= http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=7216688&story_id=10252015 | title= The Economist – The End Of Cheap Food}}</ref> |
|||
===Carbon emissions=== |
|||
Biofuels and other forms of [[renewable energy]] aim to be [[carbon neutral]] or even carbon negative. Carbon neutral means that the carbon released during the use of the fuel, e.g. through burning to power transport or generate electricity, is reabsorbed and balanced by the carbon absorbed by new plant growth. These plants are then harvested to make the next batch of fuel. [[Carbon neutral]] fuels lead to no net increases in human contributions to atmospheric [[carbon dioxide]] levels, reducing the human contributions to [[global warming]]. A carbon negative aim is achieved when a portion of the biomass is used for [[carbon sequestration]].<ref name="eprida04">[http://www.eprida.com/hydro/yahoo2004.htm] “Carbon negative energy to reverse global warming” (a posting to Energy Resources Group on Yahoo). Report on the symposium (EACU) in 2004 at the University of Georgia at Athens (Georgia, USA). Several scientists from very diverse disciplins: chemistry, archeology, physics, anthropology, microbiology, [[Pedology (soil study)|pedology]], agronomy, researchers in renewable energies, and representatives for the DOE (Department of Environment), USDA and industry. Aim: to observe the evidences of massive utilisations of carbon in history, make a synopsis on present research, and study how carbon-negative energy can be economically deployed today” (See also [http://www.georgiaitp.org/carbon])</ref> Calculating exactly how much [[greenhouse gas]] (GNG) is produced in burning biofuels is a complex and inexact process, which depends very much on the method by which the fuel is produced and the assumptions made in the calculation. |
|||
The carbon emissions ([[Carbon footprint]]) produced by biofuels are calculated using a technique called [[Life Cycle Analysis]] (LCA). This uses a "cradle to grave" or "well to wheels" approach to calculate the total amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases emitted during biofuel production, from putting seed in the ground to using the fuel in cars and trucks. Many different LCAs have been done for different biofuels, with widely differing results. The majority of LCA studies show that biofuels provide significant greenhouse gas emissions savings when compared to fossil fuels such as petroleum and diesel.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} Therefore, using biofuels to replace a proportion of the fossil fuels that are burned for transportation can reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions. The [[Life cycle assessment|well-to-wheel]] analysis for biofuels has shown that first generation biofuels can save up to 60% carbon emission and second generation biofuels can save up to 80% as opposed to using fossil fuels.<ref>[http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wtw.html Concawe European WTW study]</ref> However these studies do not take into account emissions from nitrogen fixation, deforestation, land use, or any indirect emissions. |
|||
In October 2007, a study was published by scientists from Britain, U.S., Germany and Austria, including Professor [[Paul Crutzen]], who won a Nobel Prize for his work on ozone. They reported that the burning of biofuels derived from [[rapeseed]] and [[corn]] (maize) can contribute as much or more to global warming by [[nitrous oxide]] emissions than cooling by fossil fuel savings. Nitrous oxide is both a potent greenhouse gas and a destroyer of atmospheric ozone. But they also reported that crops with lower requirements for [[nitrogen]] [[fertilizer|fertilizers]], such as grasses and woody [[coppicing]] will result in a net absorption of greenhouse gases.<ref> {{cite web |url= http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/11191/2007/acpd-7-11191-2007.html |title= N<sub>2</sub>O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels }}</ref> <ref>{{cite paper |
|||
| author = Smith, Lewis (The Times) |
|||
| title = Study: Biofuels May Produce More Greenhouse Gas Than Oil |
|||
| date = 2007, Sept. |
|||
| url =http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,297681,00.html |
|||
| format = [[HTML]] |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-09-24 }}</ref> |
|||
In February 2008, two articles were published in [[Science (journal)|Science]] which investigated the GHG emissions effects of the large amount of natural land that is being converted to cropland globally to support biofuels development.<ref> {{cite web |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/08/science/earth/08wbiofuels.html?_r=1&oref=slogin |title=Biofuels Deemed a Greenhouse Threat}}</ref> The first of these studies, conducted at the [[University of Minnesota]],<ref name=one>''Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt'' Joseph Fargione, Jason Hill, David Tilman, Stephen Polasky, Peter Hawthorne Published Online February 7, '''2008''' Science {{DOI|10.1126/science.1152747}}</ref> found that: |
|||
<blockquote>...converting rainforests, peatlands, savannas, or grasslands to produce food-based biofuels in Brazil, Southeast Asia, and the United States creates a ‘biofuel carbon debt’ by releasing 17 to 420 times more CO<sub>2</sub> than the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions these biofuels provide by displacing fossil fuels.</blockquote> |
|||
This study not only takes into account removal of the original vegetation (as timber or by burning) but also the biomass present in the soil, for example roots, which is released on continued plowing. It also pointed out that: |
|||
<blockquote>...biofuels made from waste biomass or from biomass grown on degraded and abandoned agricultural lands planted with perennials incur little or no carbon debt and can offer immediate and sustained GHG advantages.<ref name=one/></blockquote> |
|||
The second study, conducted at [[Princeton University]],<ref>''Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land Use Change'' Timothy Searchinger, Ralph Heimlich, R. A. Houghton, Fengxia Dong, Amani Elobeid, Jacinto Fabiosa, Simla Tokgoz, Dermot Hayes, Tun-Hsiang Yu Published Online February 7, '''2008''' ''Science'' {{DOI|10.1126/science.1151861}}</ref> used a worldwide agricultural model to show that: <blockquote>...corn-based ethanol, instead of producing a 20% savings, nearly doubles greenhouse emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years.</blockquote> |
|||
Both of the Science studies highlight the need for [[sustainable biofuel]]s, using feedstocks that minimize competition for prime croplands. These include farm, forest and municipal waste streams; energy crops grown on marginal lands, and algaes. These second generation biofuels feedstocks "are expected to dramatically reduce GHGs compared to first generation biofuels such as corn ethanol". In short, biofuels done unsustainably could make the climate problem worse, while biofuels done sustainably could play a leading role in solving the carbon challenge.<ref>[http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007885.html Growing Sustainable Biofuels: Common Sense on Biofuels, part 2]</ref> |
|||
===Sustainable biofuel production=== |
|||
{{main|Sustainable biofuel}} |
|||
Responsible policies and economic instruments would help to ensure that biofuel commercialization, including the development of new [[Cellulosic ethanol|cellulosic technologies]], is [[sustainable]]. Sustainable biofuel production practices would not hamper food and fibre production, nor cause water or environmental problems, and would actually enhance soil fertitlity.<ref>[http://oilendgame.com/ReadTheBook.html Winning the Oil Endgame] p. 107.</ref> Responsible commercialization of biofuels represents an opportunity to enhance sustainable economic prospects in Africa, Latin America and impoverished Asia.<ref name=sol>[http://www.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=e08c8e19-4a95-491c-9386-d30afeab5cdf&sponsor= Biofuels are part of the solution]</ref> |
|||
===Soil erosion, deforestation, and biodiversity=== |
|||
It is important to note that [[carbon]] compounds in waste [[biomass]] that is left on the ground are consumed by other [[microorganism]]s. They break down [[biomass]] in the soil to produce valuable [[nutrient]]s that are necessary for future crops. On a larger scale, plant biomass waste provides small wildlife [[habitat]], which in turn ripples up through the food chain. The widespread human use of biomass (which would normally [[compost]] the field) would threaten these organisms and natural habitats. When [[cellulosic ethanol]] is produced from feedstock like [[switchgrass]] and [[saw grass]], the nutrients that were required to grow the [[lignocellulose]] are removed and cannot be processed by microorganisms to replenish the soil nutrients. The soil is then of poorer quality. Loss of ground cover root structures accelerates unsustainable [[soil erosion]].<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=36021500 |
|||
| title= National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory |
|||
|author= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |
|||
|date= 03/05/2008 |work= |publisher= [[U.S. Department of Agriculture]] |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-03-07 }} </ref> |
|||
Significant areas of native [[Amazon rainforest]] have been cleared by [[slash and burn]] techniques to make room for [[sugar cane]] production, which is used in large part for [[ethanol fuel in Brazil]], and growing [[ethanol]] exports. Large-scale [[deforestation]] of mature trees (which help remove CO<sub>2</sub> through [[photosynthesis]] — much better than does [[sugar cane]] or most other biofuel feedstock crops do) contributes to un-[[sustainable]] [[global warming]] atmospheric [[greenhouse gas]] levels, loss of [[habitat]], and a reduction of valuable [[biodiversity]].<ref>Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, ''Extinction'', Random House, New York (1981) ISBN 0-394-51312-6</ref> Demand for biofuel has led to clearing land for [[Palm Oil]] plantations<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/business/worldbusiness/31biofuel.html | title= Once a Dream Fuel, Palm Oil May Be an Eco-Nightmare - New York Times}}</ref>. |
|||
A portion of the biomass should be retained onsite to support the soil resource. Normally this will be in the form of raw biomass, but processed biomass is also an option. If the exported biomass is used to produce [[syngas]], the process can be used to co-produce [[biochar]], a low-temperature charcoal used as a soil amendment to increase soil organic matter to a degree not practical with less recalcitrant forms of organic carbon. For co-production of biochar to be widely adopted, the soil amendment and carbon sequestration value of co-produced charcoal must exceed its net value as a source of energy.<ref> [http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/(xquef445kynlbt3pti5kdsr0)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,3,14;journal,5,231;linkingpublicationresults,1:102022,1] “Prehistorically modified soils of central [[Amazonia]]: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century”, by Bruno Glaser at the Institute of Soil Science and Soil Geography, University of Bayreuth (see the [http://www.geo.uni-bayreuth.de/bodenkunde/terra_preta/ “Terra Preta Web Site”]). Extract available [http://climatechange.researchtoday.net/archive/4/1/759.htm here]. Published online December 20, 2006 in Philosophic Transactions Royal Society B (2007) 362, 187–196. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006. 1978. This article studies the evidences concerning the process of generation of Terra preta as well as the reasons why its organic matter's and nutrients' retention is so superior to the surrounding soils.</ref> |
|||
=== Impact on water resources === |
|||
{{More sources}} |
|||
Increased use of biofuels puts increasing pressure on water resources in at least two ways: water use for the irrigation of crops used as feedstocks for biodiesel production; and water use in the production of biofuels in refineries, mostly for boiling and cooling. |
|||
==== Irrigation of feedstocks ==== |
|||
The amount of water needed to grow feedstock depends on the amount of rainfall. In areas with sufficient rainfall feedstocks can be grown without any irrigation, such as corn or sugarcane in areas with sufficient rainfall and [[Jatropha]], which is only cultivated under rainfed conditions. |
|||
However, in many parts of the world supplemental or full irrigation is needed to grow feedstocks. For example, if in the production of corn (maize) half the water needs of crops are met through irrigation and the other half through rainfall, about 860 liters of water are needed to produce one liter of ethanol.<ref> To calculate this relationship, one has to take into account that irrigated corn needs about 560 cubic meters (2.1m gallons) of water per ton of corn (as quoted in[http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2007/06/04/corn-ethanol-water/ Eco-World. Ed Ring:Is bio-fuel water positive? June 4th, 2007] using estimates from the University of Colorado and UNESCO, as well as a clarification by David Nielsen, Research Agronomist, USDA-ARS, Akron, Colorado, posted on July 19, 2007.) A good ethanol yield is about 480 galons per acre per year, and a typical corn yield is 5.6 tons per acre per year. Assuming that half the crop water needs can be met through rainfall, this would mean that still 1,570 cubic meter (1.57m liter) - 280 cubic meter of water per ton, multiplied by 5.6 tons per acre - of irrigation water are needed per acre per year to produce 1,817 liter (480 galons) of ethanol.</ref> This is 215 times more than the amount of water per liter of ethanol used in the refining process. |
|||
==== Water use in refineries ==== |
|||
Using the example of ethanol, a typical ethanol factory producing 50m gallons of biofuels a year needs about 500 gallons of water a minute, corresponding to about 4 gallons of water per gallon of biofuel. Ethanol plants now use about half as much water per gallon of ethanol as they did a decade ago. |
|||
In the United States, the number of ethanol factories has almost tripled from 50 in 2000 to about 140 in 2008. A further 60 or so are under construction, and many more are planned. Projects are being challenged by residents at courts in Missouri (where water is drawn from the [[Ozark Aquifer]]), Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas (all of which draw water from the non-renewable [[Ogallala Aquifer]]), central Illinois (where water is drawn from the [[Mahomet Aquifer]]) and Minnesota.<ref> The Economist, March 1st 2008, Ethanol and water: don't mix, p. 36 </ref> The [[Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007]] aims at increasing biofuels production in the U.S. to 36 billion gallons per year by 2022. |
|||
Using the ratio of 4 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol mentioned above this would require about 144 billion gallons of water (554 million cubic meters) per year for refining, corresponding to 4 percent of current depletion of the [[Ogallala aquifer]], the largest aquifer in the United States. While water use for refining of biofuel can have significant local impacts, its overall impact on the water balance of a larger region thus seems to be relatively limited. |
|||
===Human rights abuses=== |
|||
In some locations such as Indonesia deforestation for Palm Oil plantations is leading to displacement of Indigenous peoples. Also, extensive use of pesticide for biofuel crops is reducing clean water supplies.<ref name="indigenous" /> |
|||
===Environmental organizations stance=== |
|||
Some mainstream environmental groups support biofuels as a significant step toward slowing or stopping global climate change.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} However, biofuel production can threaten the environment if it is not done sustainably. This finding has been backed by reports of the [[UN]],<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/05/08/europe/EU-GEN-UN-Biofuels.php |title= U.N. raises possible negative impact of biofuels on environment, food security}}</ref> the [[IPCC]],<ref> [http://www.mnp.nl/ipcc/ IPCC's Mitigation of Climate Change report negative on biofuels].</ref> and some other smaller environmental and social groups as the [[EEB]]<ref> [http://www.climnet.org/EUenergy/2006_EEB_BiofuelsStrategy.pdf Biofuels no panacea] (PDF). </ref> and the Bank Sarasin,<ref> [http://www.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/2073.html Biofuels — Transporting Us to a Fossil-Free Future?].</ref> which generally remain negative about biofuels. |
|||
As a result, governmental<ref> [http://www.mail-archive.com/sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg70965.html Governmental (OECD) organisations against unsustainable biofuels].</ref> and environmental organisations are turning against biofuels made at a non-sustainable way (hereby preferring certain oil sources as [[jatropha]] and [[Cellulosic ethanol|lignocellulose]] over [[palm oil]])<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange2007/story/0,,2111985,00.html Friends of the Earth, Oxfam, ... preferring jatropha over palm oil].</ref> and are asking for global support for this.<ref> [http://www.downtoearth.org.in/full6.asp?foldername=20060715&filename=news&sec_id=49&sid=59 Environmental organisations against non-sustainable biofuels 1].</ref><ref> [http://www.eubusiness.com/Energy/ceo-press.07-09-21 Environmental organisations against non-sustainable biofuels 2].</ref> Also, besides supporting these more sustainable biofuels, environmental organisations are redirecting to new technologies that do not use [[internal combustion engine]]s such as [[Zero emission#Zero emission engines|hydrogen and compressed air]].<ref> [http://www.zerocarbonnow.org/ Zero Carbon Environmental Organisation].</ref> |
|||
The "Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels" is an international initiative which brings together farmers, companies, governments, non-governmental organizations, and scientists who are interested in the sustainability of biofuels production and distribution. During 2008, the Roundtable is developing a series of principles and criteria for [[sustainable biofuel]]s production through meetings, teleconferences, and online discussions.<ref>[http://cgse.epfl.ch/page65660.html The Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels: Ensuring Biofuels Deliver on their Promise of Sustainability]</ref> |
|||
The increased manufacture of biofuels will require increasing land areas to be used for agriculture. Second and third generation biofuel processes can ease the pressure on land, because they can use waste biomass, and existing (untapped) sources of biomass such as crop residues and potentially even marine algae. |
|||
In some regions of the world, a combination of increasing demand for food, and increasing demand for biofuel, is causing deforestation and threats to biodiversity. The best reported example of this is the expansion of oil palm plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia, where rainforest is being destroyed to establish new oil palm plantations. It is an important fact that 90% of the palm oil produced in Malaysia is used by the food industry;<ref> [http://www.mpoc.org.za/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=2 Malaysian Palm Oil Council].</ref> therefore biofuels cannot be held solely responsible for this deforestation. There is a pressing need for sustainable palm oil production for the food and fuel industries; palm oil is used in a wide variety of food products. The ''Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels'' is working to define criteria, standards and processes to promote sustainably produced biofuels.<ref> [http://cgse.epfl.ch/page65660-en.html Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels website].</ref> Palm oil is also used in the manufacture of detergents, and in electricity and heat generation both in Asia and around the world (the UK burns palm oil in coal-fired power stations to generate electricity). |
|||
Significant area is likely to be dedicated to sugar cane in future years as demand for ethanol increases worldwide. The expansion of sugar cane plantations will place pressure on environmentally-sensitive native ecosystems including rainforest in South America.<ref> [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6636467.stm ''BBC News''].</ref> In forest ecosystems, these effects themselves will undermine the climate benefits of alternative fuels, in addition to representing a major threat to global biodiversity.<ref> [http://www.tni.org/detail_pub.phtml?know_id=188 Agrofuels — towards a reality check in nine key areas].</ref> |
|||
Although biofuels are generally considered to improve net carbon output, biodiesel and other fuels do produce local air pollution, including [[nitrogen oxide]]s, the principal cause of [[smog]].{{Fact|date=May 2007}} |
|||
===Potential for poverty reduction=== |
|||
Researchers at the [[Overseas Development Institute]] have argued that biofuels could help to reduce poverty in the developing world, through increased [[employment]], wider [[economic growth]] multipliers and energy price effects. However, this potential is described as 'fragile', and is reduced where feedstock production tends to be large scale, or causes pressure on limited agricultural resources: capital investment, land, water, and the net cost of food for the poor. |
|||
With regards to the potential for poverty reduction or exacerbation, biofuels rely on many of the same policy, regulatory or investment shortcomings that impede [[agriculture]] as a route to [[poverty reduction]]. Since many of these shortcomings require policy improvements at a country level rather than a global one, they argue for a country-by-country analysis of the potential poverty impacts of biofuels. This would consider, among other things, land administration systems, market coordination and prioritising investment in [[biodiesel]], as this 'generates more labour, has lower transportation costs and uses simpler technology'.<ref name="biofuelsandpovreduction">{{cite web |url= http://www.odi.org.uk/nrp/NRP107.pdf |title= Biofuels, Agriculture and Poverty Reduction |accessyear= 2007 |year= 2007 |publisher= Overseas Development Institute }}</ref> |
|||
=== Biofuel prices === |
|||
Retail, at the pump prices, including U.S. subsidies, Federal and state [[motor tax]]es, B2/B5 prices for low-level Biodiesel (B2-B5) are lower than [[petroleum]] diesel by about 12 cents, and B20 blends are the same per unit of volume as petrodiesel.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/pdfs/afpr_jul_07.pdf |
|||
| title= "Clean Cities Alternative Fuel Price Report" |
|||
|author= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |
|||
| date= July 2007 | format= [[PDF]] |work= |
|||
| publisher= [[United States Department of Energy|U.S. Dept. of Energy]] |
|||
|pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-01-15 }} </ref> |
|||
Due to the 1/3 lower energy content of [[ethanol fuel]], even the heavily-subsidized net cost to drive a specific distance in [[flexible-fuel vehicle]]s is higher than current gasoline prices. |
|||
===Energy efficiency and energy balance of biofuels=== |
|||
{{More sources}} |
|||
Production of biofuels from raw materials requires [[energy]] (for farming, transport and conversion to final product, and the production / application of [[fertilizer]]s, [[pesticide]]s, [[herbicide]]s, and [[fungicide]]s). We cannot continue stripping ecosystems of large quantities of biomass year-after-year, without environmental consequences.<ref>[http://www.venturebeat.com/2006/11/05/why-cellulosic-ethanol-will-not-save-us/ Cellulosic ethanol will not save us]</ref> |
|||
The level of energy expenditure varies by location: more-intensive, high-yield, genetically-engineered crop agricultural regimes such, as those found in Western countries, are more energy and irrigation intensive. The more machinery is used for farming, the greater the energy expended in the process; developing countries tend to have less-energy-intensive, lower-yield, agricultural methods. |
|||
It is possible to produce biomass without incurring large agricultural energy costs: for example, wild-harvesting grass and wood byproducts from established forests can be done without much energy input. However, the yield of biomass from such resources is not consistent or large enough to support biofuel manufacture on a large scale. Producing biofuels from [[cellulose]] is more energy intensive than from [[sugar]] and [[starch]] foods, like corn and soy, which negatively impact food supply. |
|||
The [[energy balance]] of a biofuel is determined by the amount of energy put into the manufacture of fuel compared to the amount of energy released when it is burned in a vehicle. This varies by feedstock and according to the assumptions used. Biodiesel made from sunflowers may produce only 0.46 times the input rate of fuel energy.<ref>{{Cite journal| last = Pimentel | first = D. | coauthors = T.W. Patzek | title = Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower | journal = Natural Resources Research | volume = 14 | issue = 1 | pages = 65-75 | year = 2005 | doi = 10.1007/s11053-005-4679-8 | url = http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/Pimentel-Tadzek.pdf | accessdate = 2008-01-25}}</ref> Biodiesel made from soybeans may produce 3.2 times the input rate of fossil fuels.<ref>{{cite book | title = Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel |
|||
| author = John Sheehan | coauthors = Vince Camobreco, J. Duffield, M. Graboski, H. Shapouri | year = 1998 |
|||
| month = May | publisher = National Renewable Energy Laboratory | place = Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 |
|||
| url = http://www.biodiesel.org/resources/reportsdatabase/reports/gen/19980501_gen-339.pdf | format = [[PDF]] |
|||
| id = NREL/SR-580-24089 | accessdate = 2008-01-24}} (see page 33)</ref> This compares to 0.805 for gasoline and 0.843 for diesel made from petroleum.<ref>{{citation | title = The Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol: An Update | url = http://www.ethanolrfa.org/objects/documents/79/aer-813.pdf | last = Shapouri |year = 2002 | publisher = [[USDA]] | id = Agricultural Economic Report No. 813 | accessdate = 2008-01-25}}(see page 8)</ref> |
|||
Biofuels may require higher energy input per unit of [[BTU]] energy content produced than [[fossil fuel]]s: petroleum can be pumped out of the ground and processed more efficiently than biofuels can be grown and processed. However, this is not necessarily a reason to use oil instead of biofuels, nor does it have an impact on the environmental benefits provided by a given biofuel. |
|||
Other factors connected to energy balance include a) cost and b) environmental impact. High energy impacts do not necessarily mean that the resulting fuel will be bad for the environment: energy can be derived from renewable resources to power biofuel manufacture. |
|||
Energy balance is not necessarily a measure of a good biofuel. Biofuels must eventually become cost-effective without heavy subsidies: affordable, lower total cost per unit of distance, environmentally [[sustainable]], abundant, and provide lower [[greenhouse gas]] (GHG) emissions (all things considered) than fossil fuels. As fossil fuel [[peak oil]] supply declines, prices increase, and biofuel technology (like [[collocation]]) improves, progress toward these challenging goals should slowly improve. |
|||
Energy balance/ efficiency of conversion is relevant when considering how best to use a given amount of biomass resources. For example, given limited resources should biomass be converted into heat and power or liquid transport fuels? Looking at energy balance and the efficiency of energy conversion can help to use biomass resources efficiently and with maximum environmental gain. |
|||
Studies have been done that calculate energy balances for biofuel production. Some of these show large differences depending on the biomass feedstock used and location.<ref> [http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/3/60542/---/l=2 "Biofuel" does not necessarily mean ecologically friendly] ([[EMPA]] report May 2007).</ref> |
|||
To explain one specific example, a [[June 17]], [[2006]] editorial in the Wall. St. Journal stated, "The most widely cited research on this subject comes from Cornell's David Pimental and Berkeley's Ted Patzek. They've found that it takes more than a gallon of fossil fuel to make one gallon of ethanol — 29% more. That's because it takes enormous amounts of fossil-fuel energy to grow corn (using fertilizer and irrigation), to transport the crops and then to turn that corn into ethanol."<ref> [http://www.opinionjournal.com/weekend/hottopic/?id=110008530 An Energy Field of Dreams] The Wall St. Journal, June 17, 2006</ref> |
|||
The energy balance is more favourable for biofuels made from crops grown in subtropical or tropical areas than those made from crops grown in temperate areas, where there is snow on the ground part of the year, and the growing season is short. This is largely due to the increased yield of biomass from crops in areas that receive more annual sunlight, with a year-round growing season (as in equatorial [[Brazil]]). |
|||
Life cycle assessments of biofuel production show that under certain circumstances, biofuels produce only limited savings in energy and greenhouse gas emissions. Fertiliser inputs and transportation of biomass across large distances can reduce the GHG savings achieved. The location of biofuel processing plants can be planned to minimize the need for transport, and agricultural regimes can be developed to limit the amount of fertiliser used for biomass production. A European study on the greenhouse gas emissions found that [[Life cycle assessment|well-to-wheel]] (WTW) CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of biodiesel from seed crops such as [[rapeseed]] could be almost as high as fossil diesel. It showed a similar result for bio-ethanol from starch crops, which could have almost as many WTW CO<sub>2</sub> emissions as fossil petrol. This study showed that second generation biofuels have far lower WTW CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.<ref> [http://www.refuel.eu/fileadmin/refuel/user/docs/Final_report_-_Shift_Gear_to_Biofuels.pdf European VIEWLS Biofuel report p.28 fig.4] (PDF).</ref> |
|||
Other independent LCA studies show that biofuels save around 50% of the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the equivalent fossil fuels. This can be increased to 80-90% GHG emissions savings if second generation processes or reduced fertiliser growing regimes are used. Further GHG savings can be achieved by using by-products to provide heat, such as using [[bagasse]] to power ethanol production from sugarcane.<ref> [http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wtw.html Concawe Well to Wheels LCA for biofuels].</ref> |
|||
[[Collocation]] of [[synergistic]] processing plants can enhance efficiency. One example is to use the exhaust heat from an industrial process for ethanol production, which can then [[recycle]] cooler processing water, instead of evaporating hot water that warms the atmosphere.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url= http://www.biomassmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=1278 |
|||
| title= "FPL Energy finds partner for citrus-peel-to-ethanol plant" |
|||
|date= October 2007 |publisher= ''Biomass Magazine'' |
|||
| accessdate= 2008-03-07 }} </ref> |
|||
===Biofuels and solar energy efficiency=== |
|||
Biofuels from plant materials convert energy that was originally captured from [[solar energy]] via [[photosynthesis]]. A comparison of conversion efficiency from solar to usable energy (taking into account the whole energy budgets) shows that [[photovoltaics]] are 100 times more efficient than [[corn ethanol]]<ref> [http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/SuperModels/ShuckTheEthanolAndLetSolarShine.aspx Markman, Jon, "Shuck the ethanol and let solar shine" 10/11/2007]</ref> and 10 times more efficient than the best biofuel.<ref>[http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/06/15/solar-power-biofuel-vs-photovoltaics/ "Biofuel vs. Photovoltaics" EcoWorld]</ref> <!-- this may need cleaning up or more references, but the comparisons seem very important to include somewhere in this article --> |
|||
===Centralized vs. decentralized production=== |
|||
{{More sources}} |
|||
There is debate around the best model for production. |
|||
One side sees centralized vegetable oil fuel production offering |
|||
*efficiency |
|||
*greater potential for fuel standardization |
|||
*ease of administrating taxes |
|||
*possibility for rapid expansion |
|||
The other side of the argument points to |
|||
*increased fuel security |
|||
*rural job creation |
|||
*less of a 'monopolistic' market due to the increased number of producers |
|||
*benefits to local economy as a greater part of any profits stay in the local economy |
|||
*decreased transportation of feedstock and end product |
|||
*consumers close to and able to observe the effects of production |
|||
The majority of established biofuel markets have followed the centralised model with a few small or micro producers holding a minor segment of the market. A noticeable exception to this has been the [[pure plant oil]] (PPO) market in [[Germany]] which grew exponentially until the beginning of 2008 when increasing feedstock prices and the introduction of fuel duty combined to stifle the market. Fuel was produced in hundreds of small oil mills distributed throughout Germany often run as part of farm businesses. |
|||
Initially fuel quality could be variable but as the market matured new technologies were developed that made significantly improvements. As the technologies surrounding this fuel improved usage and production rapidly increased with [[rapeseed oil]] [[PPO]] forming a large segment of transportation biofuels consumed in 2007. <ref>[http://ltnet.lv-h.de/en/volltext/Lt20051/LT20051E_016_017.pdf Oil Processing in Decentralised Oil Mills]</ref> <ref>[http://www.ufop.de/publikationen_english.php Reports on markets for vegetable oils at UFOP]</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
|||
{{EnergyPortal}} |
|||
{{Portal|Ecology}} |
|||
{{Portal|Sustainable development|Sustainable development.svg}} |
|||
{{Wikinewscat|Renewable energy}} |
|||
{| |
|||
|- valign=top |
|||
| width=250 align=left | |
|||
* [[:Category:Biofuel by country]] |
|||
* [[Algaculture]] and [[algology]] |
|||
* [[Anaerobic digestion]] |
|||
* [[Biobutanol]], a direct biofuel that replaces gasoline. |
|||
* [[Biodiesel]] |
|||
* [[Bioenergy]] |
|||
* [[Biofuel in Sweden]] |
|||
* [[Biofuel in the United States]] |
|||
* [[Biofuelwatch]] |
|||
* [[Biogas]] and [[Biogas powerplant]] |
|||
* [[Bioheat]], a biofuel blended with [[heating oil]]. |
|||
* [[Biohydrogen]] |
|||
* [[pyrolysis|Biomass to liquid bio-oil]] |
|||
* [[Directive on the Promotion of the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels for transport]] |
|||
* [[Ecological sanitation]] and biogas. |
|||
* [[Energy content of biofuel]] |
|||
* [[Ethanol fuel]] |
|||
| width=250 align=left | |
|||
* [[Gasification]] |
|||
* [[Hybrid vehicle]] |
|||
* [[List of emerging technologies]] |
|||
* [[List of vegetable oils]] section on oils used as biodiesel |
|||
* [[Low-carbon economy]] |
|||
* [[Straight vegetable oil]] |
|||
* [[United Nations Environment Programme]] (UNEP) |
|||
* [[Vegetable oil economy]] |
|||
* [[Waste vegetable oil]] |
|||
* [[Energy crop]] |
|||
* [[Energy density]] |
|||
* [[Energy Policy Act of 2005]] |
|||
* [[Energy security]] |
|||
|} |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{reflist|2}} |
|||
==External links== |
|||
* {{dmoz|Science/Technology/Energy/Renewable/Biomass_and_Biofuels/|Biofuels}} |
|||
{{Environmental technology}} |
|||
[[Category:Alternative propulsion]] |
|||
[[Category:Anaerobic digestion]] |
|||
[[Category:Biodegradable waste management]] |
|||
[[Category:Biofuels]] |
|||
[[Category:Climate change]] |
|||
[[Category:Renewable energy]] |
|||
[[Category:Sustainable technologies]] |
|||
[[Category:Energy sources]] |
|||
[[ar:طاقة حيوية]] |
|||
[[zh-min-nan:Seng-bu̍t jiân-liāu]] |
|||
[[be:Біяпаліва]] |
|||
[[bg:Биогориво]] |
|||
[[da:Biobrændsel og biobrændstof]] |
|||
[[de:Biokraftstoff]] |
|||
[[et:Biokütus]] |
|||
[[el:Βιοκαύσιμα]] |
|||
[[es:Biocombustible]] |
|||
[[fr:Biocarburant]] |
|||
[[gl:Biocombustible]] |
|||
[[ko:바이오 연료]] |
|||
[[id:Biofuel]] |
|||
[[it:Biocarburante]] |
|||
[[lt:Biodegalai]] |
|||
[[nl:Biobrandstof]] |
|||
[[ja:バイオ燃料]] |
|||
[[no:Biobrensel]] |
|||
[[oc:Biocombustible]] |
|||
[[pa:ਬਾਇਓ ਬਾਲਣ]] |
|||
[[pl:Biopaliwo]] |
|||
[[pt:Biocombustível]] |
|||
[[ru:Биотопливо]] |
|||
[[fi:Biopolttoaine]] |
|||
[[sv:Biobränsle]] |
|||
[[ta:உயிரி எரிபொருள்]] |
|||
[[th:เชื้อเพลิงชีวภาพ]] |
|||
[[vi:Nhiên liệu sinh học]] |
|||
[[tr:Biyoyakıt]] |
|||
[[uk:Біопаливо]] |
|||
[[wa:Biyocarburant]] |
|||
[[zh:生質燃料]] |
Revision as of 11:01, 30 April 2008
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Sugar_cane_leaves.jpg/220px-Sugar_cane_leaves.jpg)
Part of a series on |
Renewable energy |
---|
![]() |
Biofuel (if cultivated, then also called agrofuel or agrifuel) can be broadly defined as solid, liquid, or gas fuel consisting of, or derived from recently dead biological material, most commonly plants. This distinguishes it from fossil fuel, which is derived from long dead biological material.
Biofuel can be theoretically produced from any (biological) carbon source. The most common by far is photosynthetic plants that capture solar energy. Many different plants and plant-derived materials are used for biofuel manufacture.
Biofuels are used globally and biofuel industries are expanding in Europe, Asia and the Americas. The most common use for biofuels is as liquid fuels for automotive transport. The use of renewable biofuels provides increased independence from petroleum and enhances energy security.[1]
There are various current issues with biofuel production and use, which are presently being discussed in the popular media and scientific journals. These include: the effect of moderating oil prices, the "food vs fuel" debate, carbon emissions levels, sustainable biofuel production, deforestation and soil erosion, impact on water resources, human rights issues, poverty reduction potential, biofuel prices, energy balance and efficiency, and centralised versus decentralised production models.
One of the greatest technical challenges is to develop ways to convert biomass energy specifically to liquid fuels for transportation. To achieve this, the two most common strategies are:
- 1. To grow sugar crops (sugar cane, and sugar beet), or starch (corn/maize), and then use yeast fermentation to produce ethanol (ethyl alcohol).
- 2. To grow plants that (naturally) produce oils, such as oil palm, soybean, algae, or jatropha. When these oils are heated, their viscosity is reduced, and they can be burned directly in a diesel engine, or the oils can be chemically processed to produce fuels such as biodiesel.
Wood and its byproducts can be converted into biofuels such as woodgas, methanol or ethanol fuel. Some researchers are working to improve these processes.
History and policy
Humans have used biomass fuels in the form of solid biofuels for heating and cooking since the discovery of fire. Following the discovery of electricity, it became possible to use biofuels to generate electrical power as well. However, the discovery and use of fossil fuels: coal, gas and oil, have dramatically reduced the amount of biomass fuel used in the developed world for transport, heat and power.
Liquid biofuels have been used since the early days of the automobile industry. Nikolaus August Otto, the German inventor of the internal combustion engine, conceived his invention to run on ethanol.[citation needed] Rudolf Diesel, the German inventor of the Diesel engine, designed it to run on peanut oil, and Henry Ford originally designed the Ford Model T, a car produced from 1903 to 1926, to run completely on hemp derived biofuel.[2][3] However, when large supplies of crude oil were discovered in Pennsylvania and Texas, petroleum based fuels became inexpensive, and soon were widely used. Cars and trucks began using fuels derived from mineral oil/petroleum: gasoline/petrol or diesel.
Nevertheless, before World War II, and during the high demand wartime period, biofuels were valued as a strategic alternative to imported oil. Wartime Germany experienced extreme oil shortages, and many energy innovations resulted. This include the powering of some of its vehicles using a blend of gasoline with alcohol fermented from potatoes, called Reichskraftsprit.[citation needed] In Britain, grain alcohol was blended with petrol by the Distillers Company Limited under the name Discol, and marketed through Esso's affiliate Cleveland.[citation needed]
During the peacetime post-war period, inexpensive oil from the Middle East contributed in part to the lessened economic and geopolitical interest in biofuels. Then in 1973 and 1979, geopolitical conflict in the Middle East caused OPEC to cut exports, and non-OPEC nations experienced a very large decrease in their oil supply. This "energy crisis" resulted in severe shortages, and a sharp increase in high demand oil-based products, notably petrol/gasoline. There was also increased interest from governments and academics in energy issues and biofuels. Throughout history, the fluctuations of supply and demand, energy policy, military conflict, and the environmental impacts, have all contributed to a highly complex and volatile market for energy and fuel.
In the year 2000 and beyond, renewed interest in biofuels has been seen. The drivers for biofuel research and development include rising oil prices, concerns over the potential oil peak, greenhouse gas emissions (causing global warming and climate change), rural development interests, and instability in the Middle East.
Biomass
Biomass is material derived from recently living organisms. This includes plants, animals and their by-products. For example, manure, garden waste and crop residues are all sources of biomass. It is a renewable energy source based on the carbon cycle, unlike other natural resources such as petroleum, coal, and nuclear fuels.
Animal waste is a persistent and unavoidable pollutant produced primarily by the animals housed in industrial sized farms. Researchers from Washington University have figured out a way to turn manure into magic. In April 2008 with the help of imaging technology they noticed that vigorous mixing helps microorganisms turn farm waste into alternative energy. Providing farmers with a simple way to treat their waste and convert it into energy.[4]
There are also agricultural products specifically grown for biofuel production include corn, switchgrass, and soybeans, primarily in the United States; rapeseed, wheat and sugar beet primarily in Europe; sugar cane in Brazil; palm oil and miscanthus in South-East Asia; sorghum and cassava in China; and jatropha in India. Hemp has also been proven to work as a biofuel. Biodegradable outputs from industry, agriculture, forestry and households can be used for biofuel production, either using anaerobic digestion to produce biogas, or using second generation biofuels; examples include straw, timber, manure, rice husks, sewage, and food waste. The use of biomass fuels can therefore contribute to waste management as well as fuel security and help to prevent climate change, though alone they are not a comprehensive solution to these problems.
Bioenergy from waste
Using waste biomass to produce energy can reduce the use of fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduce pollution and waste management problems. A recent publication by the European Union highlighted the potential for waste-derived bioenergy to contribute to the reduction of global warming. The report concluded that 19 million tons of oil equivalent is available from biomass by 2020, 46% from bio-wastes: municipal solid waste (MSW), agricultural residues, farm waste and other biodegradable waste streams.[5][6]
Landfill sites generate gases as the waste buried in them undergoes anaerobic digestion. These gases are known collectively as landfill gas. This can be burned and is considered a source of renewable energy, even though landfill disposal are often non-sustainable. [Landfill gas (LFG)] can be burned either directly for heat or to generate electricity for public consumption. Landfill gas contains approximately 50 percent methane, the same gas that is found in natural gas.[citation needed]
If landfill gas is not harvested, it escapes into the atmosphere: this is not desirable because methane is a greenhouse gas, with more global warming potential than carbon dioxide.[7][8] Over a time span of 100 years, methane has a global warming potential of 23 relative to CO2.[7] Therefore, during this time, one ton of methane produces the same greenhouse gas (GHG) effect as 23 tons of CO2.[citation needed] When methane burns the formula is CH4 + 2O2 = CO2 + 2H2O So by harvesting and burning landfill gas, its global warming potential is reduced a factor of 23, in addition to providing energy for heat and power.
Frank Keppler and Thomas Rockmann discovered that living plants also produce methane CH4.[9] The amount of methane produced by living plants is 10 to 100 times greater than that produced by dead plants (in an aerobic environment) [citation needed] but does not increase global warming because of the carbon cycle.[citation needed]
Anaerobic digestion can be used as a distinct waste management strategy to reduce the amount of waste sent to landfill and generate methane, or biogas. Any form of biomass can be used in anaerobic digestion and will break down to produce methane, which can be harvested and burned to generate heat, power or to power certain automotive vehicles.
A 3 MW landfill power plant would power 1,900 homes.[citation needed] It would eliminate 6,000 tons per year of methane from getting into the environment.[citation needed] It would eliminate 18,000 tons per year of CO2 from fossil fuel replacement.[citation needed] This is the same as removing 25,000 cars from the road,[citation needed] or planting 36,000 acres (146 km2) of forest,[citation needed] or not using 305,000 barrels of oil per year.[citation needed]
Liquid fuels for transportation
Most transportation fuels are liquids, because vehicles usually require high energy density, as occurs in liquids and solids. Vehicles usually need high power density as can be provided most inexpensively by an internal combustion engines. These engines require clean burning fuels, in order to keep the engine clean and minimize air pollution. The fuels that are easier to burn cleanly are typically liquids and gases. Thus only liquids meet the requirements of being both portable and clean burning. Also, liquids can be pumped, which means handling is easily mechanized, and thus less laborious.
First generation biofuels
'First-generation fuels' refer to biofuels made from sugar, starch, vegetable oil, or animal fats using conventional technology.[10]
The most common first generation biofuels are listed below.
Vegetable oil
Vegetable oil can be used for either food or fuel; the quality of the oil may be lower for fuel use. Vegetable oil can be used in many older diesel engines (equipped with indirect injection systems), but only in warm climates. In most cases, vegetable oil is used to manufacture biodiesel, which is compatible with most diesel engines when blended with conventional diesel fuel. MAN B&W Diesel, Wartsila and Deutz AG offer engines that are compatible with straight vegetable oil. Used vegetable oil is increasingly being processed into biodiesel, and at a smaller scale, cleaned of water and particulates and used as a fuel.
Biodiesel
Biodiesel is the most common biofuel in Europe. It is produced from oils or fats using transesterification and is a liquid similar in composition to mineral diesel. Its chemical name is fatty acid methyl (or ethyl) ester (FAME). Oils are mixed with sodium hydroxide and methanol (or ethanol) and the chemical reaction produces biodiesel (FAME) and glycerol. 1 part glycerol is produced for every 10 parts biodiesel.
Biodiesel can be used in any diesel engine when mixed with mineral diesel. In some countries manufacturers cover their diesel engines under warranty for 100% biodiesel use, although Volkswagen Germany, for example, asks drivers to make a telephone check with the VW environmental services department before switching to 100% biodiesel (see biodiesel use). Many people have run their vehicles on biodiesel without problems. However, the majority of vehicle manufacturers limit their recommendations to 15% biodiesel blended with mineral diesel. In many European countries, a 5% biodiesel blend is widely used and is available at thousands of gas stations.[11][12]
In the USA, more than 80% of commercial trucks and city buses run on diesel. Therefore "the nascent U.S. market for biodiesel is growing at a staggering rate—from 25 million gallons per year in 2004 to 78 million gallons by the beginning of 2005. By the end of 2006 biodiesel production was estimated to increase fourfold to more than 1 billion gallons," energy expert Will Thurmond writes in an article for the July-August 2007 issue of THE FUTURIST magazine.
Bioalcohols
Biologically produced alcohols, most commonly ethanol, and less commonly propanol and butanol, are produced by the action of microorganisms and enzymes through fermentation of sugars or starches (easiest), or celulose (which is more difficult). Biobutanol (also called biogasoline) is often claimed to provide a direct replacement for gasoline, because it can be used directly in a gasoline engine (in a similar way to biodiesel in diesel engines).
Butanol is formed by ABE fermentation (acetone, butanol, ethanol) and experimental modifications of the process show potentially high net energy gains with butanol as the only liquid product. Butanol will produce more energy and allegedly can be burned "straight" in existing gasoline engines (without modification to the engine or car),[13] and is less corrosive and less water soluble than ethanol, and could be distributed via existing infrastructures. DuPont and BP are working together to help develop Butanol.
Ethanol fuel is the most common biofuel worldwide, particularly ethanol fuel in Brazil. Alcohol fuels are produced by fermentation of sugars derived from wheat, corn, sugar beets, sugar cane, molasses and any sugar or starch that alcoholic beverages can be made from (like potato and fruit waste, etc.). The ethanol production methods used are enzyme digestion (to release sugars from stored starches, fermentation of the sugars, distillation and drying. The process requires significant energy input for heat (often unsustainable natural gas fossil fuel).
Cellulosic ethanol production uses non food crops or inedible waste products, which has less of an impact on food. Lignocellulose is the "woody" structural material of plants. This feedstock is abundant and diverse, and in some cases (like citrus peels or sawdust) it is a significant industry-specific disposal problem.
Producing ethanol from cellulose is a more difficult-and-expensive additional-step technical problem to solve. Ruminant livestock (like cattle) eat grass and then use slow enzymatic digestive processes to break it into glucose (sugar). In cellulosic ethanol laboratories, various experimental processes are being used to do the same thing, and then do the above process to make ethanol fuel.
Some scientists have expressed concern that if experimental recombinant DNA genetic engineering continues to be used to develop unprecedented enzymes that break down wood much faster than in nature, such microscopic life forms may accidentally be released into nature, grow exponentially, be distributed by the wind, and eventually destroy the structure of all trees, ending all Earthly life that breathes oxygen released by photosynthesis in trees[citation needed].
Ethanol can be used in petrol engines as a replacement for gasoline; it can be mixed with gasoline to any percentage. Most existing automobile petrol engines can run on blends of up to 15% bioethanol with petroleum/gasoline. Gasoline with ethanol added has higher octane, which means that your engine can typically burn hotter and more efficiently. In high altitude (thin air) locations, some states mandate a mix of gasoline and ethanol as a winter oxidizer to reduce atmospheric polloution emissions.
Ethanol fuel has less BTU energy content, which means it takes more fuel (volume and mass) to go the same distance. More-expensive premium fuels contain less, or no, ethanol. In high-compression engines, less ethanol, slower-burning premium fuel is required to avoid harmful pre-ignition (knocking). Very-expensive aviation gasoline (Avgas) is 100 octane made from 100% petroleum. The high price of zero-ethanol Avgas does not include federal-and-state road-use taxes.
Ethanol is very corrosive to fuel systems, rubber hoses-and-gaskets, aluminum, and combustion chambers. It is therefore illegal to use fuels containing alcohol in aircraft. Ethanol is incompatible with marine fiberglass fuel tanks (it makes them leak). For higher ethanol percentage blends, and 100% ethanol vehicles, engine modifications are required.
Corrosive ethanol cannot be transported in petroleum pipelines, so more-expensive over-the-road stainless-steel tank trucks increase the cost and energy consumption required to deliver ethanol to the customer at the pump.
When considering the total energy consumed by farm equipment, cultivation, planting, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides made from petroleum, irrigation systems, harvesting, transport of feedstock to processing plants, fermentation, distillation, drying, transport to fuel terminals and retail pumps, and lower ethanol fuel energy content, the net energy content value added and delivered to consumers is very small. And, the net benefit (all things considered) does little to reduce un-sustainable imported oil and fossil fuels required to produce the ethanol.[14]
Many car manufacturers are now producing flexible-fuel vehicles (FFV's), which can safely run on any combination of bioethanol and petrol, up to 100% bioethanol. They dynamically sense exhaust oxygen content, and adjust the engine's computer systems, spark, and fuel injection accordingly. This adds initial cost and ongoing increased vehicle maintenance. Efficiency falls and pollution emissions increase when FFV system maintenance is needed (regardless of the 0%-to-100% ethanol mix being used), but not performed (as with all vehicles). FFV internal combustion engines are becoming increasingly complex, as are multiple-propulsion-system FFV hybrid vehicles, which impacts cost, maintenance, reliability, and useful lifetime longevity.
Alcohol mixes with both petroleum and with water, so ethanol fuels are often diluted after the drying process by absorbing environmental moisture from the atmosphere. Water in alcohol-mix fuels reduces efficiency, makes engines harder to start, causes intermittent operation (sputtering), and oxidizes aluminum (carburetors) and steel components (rust).
Even dry ethanol has roughly one-third lower energy content per unit of volume compared to gasoline, so larger / heavier fuel tanks are required to travel the same distance, or more fuel stops are required. With large current un-sustainable, non-scalable subsidies, ethanol fuel still costs much more per unit of distance traveled than current high gasoline prices.[15]
Methanol is currently produced from natural gas, a non-renewable fossil fuel. It can also be produced from biomass as biomethanol. The methanol economy is an interesting alternative to the hydrogen economy, compared to today's hydrogen produced from natural gas, but not hydrogen production directly from water and state-of-the-art clean solar thermal energy processes.[16]
BioGas
Biogas is produced by the process of anaerobic digestion of organic material by anaerobes. It can be produced either from biodegradable waste materials or by the use of energy crops fed into anaerobic digesters to supplement gas yields. The solid byproduct, digestate, can be used as a biofuel or a fertilizer.
Biogas contains methane and can be recovered from industrial anaerobic digesters and mechanical biological treatment systems. Landfill gas is a less clean form of biogas which is produced in landfills through naturally occurring anaerobic digestion. If it escapes into the atmosphere it is a potent greenhouse gas.
Oils and gases can be produced from various biological wastes:
- Thermal depolymerization of waste can extract methane and other oils similar to petroleum.
- GreenFuel Technologies Corporation developed a patented bioreactor system that uses nontoxic photosynthetic algae to take in smokestacks flue gases and produce biofuels such as biodiesel, biogas and a dry fuel comparable to coal.[17]
Solid biofuels
Examples include wood, grass cuttings, domestic refuse, charcoal, and dried manure.
Syngas
Syngas is produced by the combined processes of pyrolysis, combustion, and gasification. Biofuel is converted into carbon monoxide and energy by pyrolysis. A limited supply of oxygen is introduced to support combustion. Gasification converts further organic material to hydrogen and additional carbon monoxide.
The resulting gas mixture, syngas, is itself a fuel. Using the syngas is more efficient than direct combustion of the original biofuel; more of the energy contained in the fuel is extracted.
Syngas may be burned directly in internal combustion engines. The wood gas generator is a wood-fueled gasification reactor mounted on an internal combustion engine. Syngas can be used to produce methanol and hydrogen, or converted via the Fischer-Tropsch process to produce a synthetic petroleum substitute. Gasification normally relies on temperatures >700°C. Lower temperature gasification is desirable when co-producing biochar.
Second generation biofuels
Supporters of biofuels claim that a more viable solution is to increase political and industrial support for, and rapidity of, second-generation biofuel implementation from non food crops, including cellulosic biofuels.[18] Second-generation biofuel production processes can use a variety of non food crops. These include waste biomass, the stalks of wheat, corn, wood, and special-energy-or-biomass crops (e.g. Miscanthus). Second generation (2G) biofuels use biomass to liquid technology, including cellulosic biofuels from non food crops.[19] Many second generation biofuels are under development such as biohydrogen, biomethanol, DMF, Bio-DME, Fischer-Tropsch diesel, biohydrogen diesel, mixed alcohols and wood diesel.
Third generation biofuels
Algae fuel, also called oilgae or third generation biofuel, is a biofuel from algae. Algae are low-input/high-yield (30 times more energy per acre than land) feedstocks to produce biofuels[20] and algae fuel are biodegradable:
- With the higher prices of oil, there is much interest in algaculture (farming algae).
- One advantage of many biofuels over most other fuel types is that they are biodegradable, and so relatively harmless to the environment if spilled.[21][22][23]
- The United States Department of Energy estimates that if algae fuel replaced all the petroleum fuel in the United States, it would require 15,000 square miles (38,849 square kilometers), which is a few thousand miles larger than Maryland.[20]
Biofuels by country
Recognizing the importance of implementing bioenergy, there are international organizations such as IEA Bioenergy,[24] established in 1978 by the OECD International Energy Agency (IEA), with the aim of improving cooperation and information exchange between countries that have national programs in bioenergy research, development and deployment. The U.N. International Biofuels Forum is formed by Brazil, China, India, South Africa, the United States and the European Commission.[25] The world leaders in biofuel development and use are Brazil, United States, France, Sweden and Germany.
China
In China, the government is making E10 blends mandatory in five provinces that account for 16% of the nation's passenger cars. In Southeast Asia, Thailand has mandated an ambitious 10% ethanol mix in gasoline starting in 2007. For similar reasons, the palm oil industry plans to supply an increasing portion of national diesel fuel requirements in Malaysia and Indonesia.[citation needed] In Canada, the government aims for 45% of the country’s gasoline consumption to contain 10% ethanol by 2010.
India
In India, a bioethanol program calls for E5 blends throughout most of the country targeting to raise this requirement to E10 and then E20. Maneater
Europe
The European Union in its biofuels directive (updated 2006) has set the goal that for 2010 that each member state should achieve at least 5.75% biofuel usage of all used traffic fuel. By 2020 the figure should be 10%. As of January 2008 these aims are being reconsidered in light of certain environmental and social concerns associated with biofuels such as rising food prices and deforestation.[26]
France
France is the second largest biofuel consumer among the EU States in 2006. According to the Ministry of Industry, France's consumption increased by 62.7% to reach 682,000 toe (i.e. 1.6% of French fuel consumption). Biodiesel represents the largest share of this (78%, far ahead of bioethanol with 22%). The unquestionable biodiesel leader in Europe is the French company Diester Industrie. In bioethanol, the French agro-industrial group Téréos is increasing its production capacities. Germany itself remained the largest European biofuel consumer, with a consumption estimate of 2.8 million tons of biodiesel (equivalent to 2,408,000 toe), 0.71 million ton of vegetable oil (628.492 toe) and 0.48 million ton of bioethanol (307,200 toe).
Germany
The biggest biodiesel German company is ADM Oelmühle Hamburg AG, which is a subsidiary of the American group Archer Daniels Midland Company. Among the other large German producers, MUW (Mitteldeutsche Umesterungswerke GmbH & Co KG) and EOP Biodiesel AG. A major contender in terms of bioethanol production is the German sugar corporation, Südzucker.[27]
Spain
The Spanish group Abengoa, via its American subsidiary Abengoa Bioenergy, is the European leader in production of bioethanol.
Sweden
The government in Sweden has together with BIL Sweden, the national association for the automobile industry, that are the automakers in Sweden started the work to end oil dependency. One-fifth of cars in Stockholm can run on alternative fuels, mostly ethanol fuel. Also Stockholm will introduce a fleet of Swedish-made hybrid ethanol-electric buses. In 2005, oil phase-out in Sweden by 2020 was announced.[28]
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) (announced 2005) is the requirement that by 2010 5% of all road vehicle fuel is renewable. In 2008 a critical report by the Royal Society stated that biofuels risk failing to deliver significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from transport and could even be environmentally damaging unless the Government puts the right policies in place.[29][30]
Brazil
In Brazil, the government hopes to build on the success of the Proálcool ethanol program by expanding the production of biodiesel which must contain 2% biodiesel by 2008, increasing to 5% by 2013.
Colombia
Colombia mandates the use of 10% ethanol in all gasoline sold in cities with populations exceeding 500,000.[31] In Venezuela, the state oil company is supporting the construction of 15 sugar cane distilleries over the next five years, as the government introduces a E10 (10% ethanol) blending mandate.[citation needed]
USA
In 2006, the United States president George W. Bush said in a State of the Union speech that the US is "addicted to oil" and should replace 75% of imported oil by 2025 by alternative sources of energy including biofuels.
Essentially all of the ethanol fuel in the US is produced from corn. Corn is a very energy intensive crop, which requires one unit of fossil-fuel energy to create just 0.9 to 1.3 energy units of ethanol.[32] A senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Congressman Fred Upton has introduced legislation to use at least E10 fuel by 2012 in all cars in the USA.
The 2007-12-19 U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires American “fuel producers to use at least 36 billion gallons of biofuel in 2022. This is nearly a fivefold increase over current levels.”[33] This is causing a significant agricultural resource shift away from food production to biofuels. American food exports have decreased (increasing grain prices worldwide), and US food imports have increased significantly.
Most biofuels are not currently cost-effective without significant subsidies. "America's ethanol program is a product of government subsidies. There are more than 200 different kinds, as well as a 54 cents-a-gallon tariff on imported ethanol. This prices Brazilian ethanol out of an otherwise competitive market. Brazil makes ethanol from sugarcane rather than corn (maize), which has a better EROEI. Federal subsidies alone cost $7 billion a year (equal to around $1.90 a gallon)."[34]
General Motors is starting a project to produce E85 fuel from cellulose ethanol for a projected cost of $1 a gallon. This is optimistic however, because $1/gal equates to $10/MBTU which is comparable to woodchips at $7/MBTU or cord wood at $6-$12/MBTU, and this does not account for conversion losses and plant operating and capital costs which are significant. The raw materials can be as simple as corn stalks and scrap petroleum-based vehicle tires,[35] but used tires are an expensive feedstock with other more-valuable uses. GM has over 4 million E85 cars on the road now, and by 2012 half of the production cars for the U.S. will be capable of running on E85 fuel, however by 2012 the supply of ethanol will not even be close to supplying this much E85. Coskata Inc. is building two new plants for the ethanol fuel. Theoretically, the process is claimed to be five times more energy efficient than corn based ethanol, however it is still in development and has not been proven to be cost effective in a free market.
The greenhouse gas emissions are reduced by 86% for cellulose compared to corn’s 29% reduction.[citation needed]
Biofuels in developing countries
Biofuel industries are becoming established in many developing countries. Many developing countries have extensive biomass resources that are becoming more valuable as demand for biomass and biofuels increases. The approaches to biofuel development in different parts of the world varies. Countries such as India and China are developing both bioethanol and biodiesel programs. India is extending plantations of jatropha, an oil-producing tree that is used in biodiesel production. The Indian sugar ethanol program sets a target of 5% bioethanol incorporation into transport fuel.[36] China is a major bioethanol producer and aims to incorporate 15% bioethanol into transport fuels by 2010. Costs of biofuel promotion programs can be very high, though.[37]
Amongst rural populations in developing countries, biomass provides the majority of fuel for heat and cooking. Wood, animal dung and crop residues are commonly burned. Figures from the International Energy Agency show that biomass energy provides around 30% of the total primary energy supply in developing countries; over 2 billion people depend on biomass fuels as their primary energy source.[38]
The use of biomass fuels for cooking indoors is a source of health problems and pollution. 1.3 million deaths were attributed to the use of biomass fuels with inadequate ventilation by the International Energy Agency in its World Energy Outlook 2006. Proposed solutions include improved stoves and alternative fuels. However, fuels are easily damaged, and alternative fuels tend to be expensive. Very low cost, fuel efficient, low pollution biomass stove designs have existed since 1980 or earlier.[39] Issues are a lack of education, distribution, excess corruption, and very low levels of foreign aid. People in developing countries are often unable to afford these solutions without assistance or financing such as microloans. Organizations such as Intermediate Technology Development Group work to make improved facilities for biofuel use and better alternatives accessible to those who cannot get them.
Current issues in biofuel production and use
Biofuels are proposed as having such benefits as: reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, reduction of fossil fuel use, increased national energy security, increased rural development and a sustainable fuel supply for the future.
However, biofuel production is questioned from a number of angles. The chairman of the International Panel on Climate Change, Rajendra Pachauri, notably observed in March 2008 that questions arise on the emissions implications of that route, and that biofuel production has clearly raised prices of corn, with an overall implication for food security. [40] [41]
Biofuels are also seen as having limitations. The feedstocks for biofuel production must be replaced rapidly and biofuel production processes must be designed and implemented so as to supply the maximum amount of fuel at the cheapest cost, while providing maximum environmental benefits. Broadly speaking, first generation biofuel production processes cannot supply us with more than a few percent of our energy requirements sustainably. The reasons for this are described below. Second generation processes can supply us with more biofuel, with better environmental gains. The major barrier to the development of second generation biofuel processes is their capital cost: establishing second generation biodiesel plants has been estimated at €500million.[42]
Recently, an inflexion point about advantages/disadvantages of biofuels seems to be gaining momentum. The March 27, 2008 TIME magazine cover features the subject under the title "The Clean Energy Myth":
Politicians and Big Business are pushing biofuels like corn-based ethanol as alternatives to oil. All they’re really doing is driving up world food prices, helping to destroy the Amazon jungle, and making global warming worse.[43]
Oil price moderation
The International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook 2006 concludes that rising oil demand, if left unchecked, would accentuate the consuming countries' vulnerability to a severe supply disruption and resulting price shock. Renewable biofuels for transport represent a key source of diversification from petroleum products.[44]
Biofuels offer the prospect of real market competition and oil price moderation. According to the Wall Street Journal, crude oil would be trading 15 per cent higher and gasoline would be as much as 25 per cent more expensive, if it were not for biofuels. A healthy supply of alternative energy sources will help to combat gasoline price spikes.[45][46]
Rising food prices — the "food vs. fuel" debate
This topic is internationally controversial. Prices on a number of food types used for biofuel have doubled in the last couple years. There are those that say biofuel is not the main cause. Some say the problem is a result of government actions to support biofuels. Others say it is just due to oil price increases. The impact of food price increases is greatest on poorer countries.[47] Some have called for a freeze on biofuels. Some have called for more funding of second generation biofuels which should not compete with food production so much.[48][49]
Carbon emissions
Biofuels and other forms of renewable energy aim to be carbon neutral or even carbon negative. Carbon neutral means that the carbon released during the use of the fuel, e.g. through burning to power transport or generate electricity, is reabsorbed and balanced by the carbon absorbed by new plant growth. These plants are then harvested to make the next batch of fuel. Carbon neutral fuels lead to no net increases in human contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, reducing the human contributions to global warming. A carbon negative aim is achieved when a portion of the biomass is used for carbon sequestration.[50] Calculating exactly how much greenhouse gas (GNG) is produced in burning biofuels is a complex and inexact process, which depends very much on the method by which the fuel is produced and the assumptions made in the calculation.
The carbon emissions (Carbon footprint) produced by biofuels are calculated using a technique called Life Cycle Analysis (LCA). This uses a "cradle to grave" or "well to wheels" approach to calculate the total amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases emitted during biofuel production, from putting seed in the ground to using the fuel in cars and trucks. Many different LCAs have been done for different biofuels, with widely differing results. The majority of LCA studies show that biofuels provide significant greenhouse gas emissions savings when compared to fossil fuels such as petroleum and diesel.[citation needed] Therefore, using biofuels to replace a proportion of the fossil fuels that are burned for transportation can reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions. The well-to-wheel analysis for biofuels has shown that first generation biofuels can save up to 60% carbon emission and second generation biofuels can save up to 80% as opposed to using fossil fuels.[51] However these studies do not take into account emissions from nitrogen fixation, deforestation, land use, or any indirect emissions.
In October 2007, a study was published by scientists from Britain, U.S., Germany and Austria, including Professor Paul Crutzen, who won a Nobel Prize for his work on ozone. They reported that the burning of biofuels derived from rapeseed and corn (maize) can contribute as much or more to global warming by nitrous oxide emissions than cooling by fossil fuel savings. Nitrous oxide is both a potent greenhouse gas and a destroyer of atmospheric ozone. But they also reported that crops with lower requirements for nitrogen fertilizers, such as grasses and woody coppicing will result in a net absorption of greenhouse gases.[52] [53]
In February 2008, two articles were published in Science which investigated the GHG emissions effects of the large amount of natural land that is being converted to cropland globally to support biofuels development.[54] The first of these studies, conducted at the University of Minnesota,[55] found that:
...converting rainforests, peatlands, savannas, or grasslands to produce food-based biofuels in Brazil, Southeast Asia, and the United States creates a ‘biofuel carbon debt’ by releasing 17 to 420 times more CO2 than the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions these biofuels provide by displacing fossil fuels.
This study not only takes into account removal of the original vegetation (as timber or by burning) but also the biomass present in the soil, for example roots, which is released on continued plowing. It also pointed out that:
...biofuels made from waste biomass or from biomass grown on degraded and abandoned agricultural lands planted with perennials incur little or no carbon debt and can offer immediate and sustained GHG advantages.[55]
The second study, conducted at Princeton University,[56] used a worldwide agricultural model to show that:
...corn-based ethanol, instead of producing a 20% savings, nearly doubles greenhouse emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years.
Both of the Science studies highlight the need for sustainable biofuels, using feedstocks that minimize competition for prime croplands. These include farm, forest and municipal waste streams; energy crops grown on marginal lands, and algaes. These second generation biofuels feedstocks "are expected to dramatically reduce GHGs compared to first generation biofuels such as corn ethanol". In short, biofuels done unsustainably could make the climate problem worse, while biofuels done sustainably could play a leading role in solving the carbon challenge.[57]
Sustainable biofuel production
Responsible policies and economic instruments would help to ensure that biofuel commercialization, including the development of new cellulosic technologies, is sustainable. Sustainable biofuel production practices would not hamper food and fibre production, nor cause water or environmental problems, and would actually enhance soil fertitlity.[58] Responsible commercialization of biofuels represents an opportunity to enhance sustainable economic prospects in Africa, Latin America and impoverished Asia.[59]
Soil erosion, deforestation, and biodiversity
It is important to note that carbon compounds in waste biomass that is left on the ground are consumed by other microorganisms. They break down biomass in the soil to produce valuable nutrients that are necessary for future crops. On a larger scale, plant biomass waste provides small wildlife habitat, which in turn ripples up through the food chain. The widespread human use of biomass (which would normally compost the field) would threaten these organisms and natural habitats. When cellulosic ethanol is produced from feedstock like switchgrass and saw grass, the nutrients that were required to grow the lignocellulose are removed and cannot be processed by microorganisms to replenish the soil nutrients. The soil is then of poorer quality. Loss of ground cover root structures accelerates unsustainable soil erosion.[60]
Significant areas of native Amazon rainforest have been cleared by slash and burn techniques to make room for sugar cane production, which is used in large part for ethanol fuel in Brazil, and growing ethanol exports. Large-scale deforestation of mature trees (which help remove CO2 through photosynthesis — much better than does sugar cane or most other biofuel feedstock crops do) contributes to un-sustainable global warming atmospheric greenhouse gas levels, loss of habitat, and a reduction of valuable biodiversity.[61] Demand for biofuel has led to clearing land for Palm Oil plantations[62].
A portion of the biomass should be retained onsite to support the soil resource. Normally this will be in the form of raw biomass, but processed biomass is also an option. If the exported biomass is used to produce syngas, the process can be used to co-produce biochar, a low-temperature charcoal used as a soil amendment to increase soil organic matter to a degree not practical with less recalcitrant forms of organic carbon. For co-production of biochar to be widely adopted, the soil amendment and carbon sequestration value of co-produced charcoal must exceed its net value as a source of energy.[63]
Impact on water resources
This article needs additional citations for verification. |
Increased use of biofuels puts increasing pressure on water resources in at least two ways: water use for the irrigation of crops used as feedstocks for biodiesel production; and water use in the production of biofuels in refineries, mostly for boiling and cooling.
Irrigation of feedstocks
The amount of water needed to grow feedstock depends on the amount of rainfall. In areas with sufficient rainfall feedstocks can be grown without any irrigation, such as corn or sugarcane in areas with sufficient rainfall and Jatropha, which is only cultivated under rainfed conditions.
However, in many parts of the world supplemental or full irrigation is needed to grow feedstocks. For example, if in the production of corn (maize) half the water needs of crops are met through irrigation and the other half through rainfall, about 860 liters of water are needed to produce one liter of ethanol.[64] This is 215 times more than the amount of water per liter of ethanol used in the refining process.
Water use in refineries
Using the example of ethanol, a typical ethanol factory producing 50m gallons of biofuels a year needs about 500 gallons of water a minute, corresponding to about 4 gallons of water per gallon of biofuel. Ethanol plants now use about half as much water per gallon of ethanol as they did a decade ago.
In the United States, the number of ethanol factories has almost tripled from 50 in 2000 to about 140 in 2008. A further 60 or so are under construction, and many more are planned. Projects are being challenged by residents at courts in Missouri (where water is drawn from the Ozark Aquifer), Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas (all of which draw water from the non-renewable Ogallala Aquifer), central Illinois (where water is drawn from the Mahomet Aquifer) and Minnesota.[65] The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 aims at increasing biofuels production in the U.S. to 36 billion gallons per year by 2022.
Using the ratio of 4 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol mentioned above this would require about 144 billion gallons of water (554 million cubic meters) per year for refining, corresponding to 4 percent of current depletion of the Ogallala aquifer, the largest aquifer in the United States. While water use for refining of biofuel can have significant local impacts, its overall impact on the water balance of a larger region thus seems to be relatively limited.
Human rights abuses
In some locations such as Indonesia deforestation for Palm Oil plantations is leading to displacement of Indigenous peoples. Also, extensive use of pesticide for biofuel crops is reducing clean water supplies.[66]
Environmental organizations stance
Some mainstream environmental groups support biofuels as a significant step toward slowing or stopping global climate change.[citation needed] However, biofuel production can threaten the environment if it is not done sustainably. This finding has been backed by reports of the UN,[67] the IPCC,[68] and some other smaller environmental and social groups as the EEB[69] and the Bank Sarasin,[70] which generally remain negative about biofuels.
As a result, governmental[71] and environmental organisations are turning against biofuels made at a non-sustainable way (hereby preferring certain oil sources as jatropha and lignocellulose over palm oil)[72] and are asking for global support for this.[73][74] Also, besides supporting these more sustainable biofuels, environmental organisations are redirecting to new technologies that do not use internal combustion engines such as hydrogen and compressed air.[75]
The "Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels" is an international initiative which brings together farmers, companies, governments, non-governmental organizations, and scientists who are interested in the sustainability of biofuels production and distribution. During 2008, the Roundtable is developing a series of principles and criteria for sustainable biofuels production through meetings, teleconferences, and online discussions.[76]
The increased manufacture of biofuels will require increasing land areas to be used for agriculture. Second and third generation biofuel processes can ease the pressure on land, because they can use waste biomass, and existing (untapped) sources of biomass such as crop residues and potentially even marine algae.
In some regions of the world, a combination of increasing demand for food, and increasing demand for biofuel, is causing deforestation and threats to biodiversity. The best reported example of this is the expansion of oil palm plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia, where rainforest is being destroyed to establish new oil palm plantations. It is an important fact that 90% of the palm oil produced in Malaysia is used by the food industry;[77] therefore biofuels cannot be held solely responsible for this deforestation. There is a pressing need for sustainable palm oil production for the food and fuel industries; palm oil is used in a wide variety of food products. The Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels is working to define criteria, standards and processes to promote sustainably produced biofuels.[78] Palm oil is also used in the manufacture of detergents, and in electricity and heat generation both in Asia and around the world (the UK burns palm oil in coal-fired power stations to generate electricity).
Significant area is likely to be dedicated to sugar cane in future years as demand for ethanol increases worldwide. The expansion of sugar cane plantations will place pressure on environmentally-sensitive native ecosystems including rainforest in South America.[79] In forest ecosystems, these effects themselves will undermine the climate benefits of alternative fuels, in addition to representing a major threat to global biodiversity.[80]
Although biofuels are generally considered to improve net carbon output, biodiesel and other fuels do produce local air pollution, including nitrogen oxides, the principal cause of smog.[citation needed]
Potential for poverty reduction
Researchers at the Overseas Development Institute have argued that biofuels could help to reduce poverty in the developing world, through increased employment, wider economic growth multipliers and energy price effects. However, this potential is described as 'fragile', and is reduced where feedstock production tends to be large scale, or causes pressure on limited agricultural resources: capital investment, land, water, and the net cost of food for the poor.
With regards to the potential for poverty reduction or exacerbation, biofuels rely on many of the same policy, regulatory or investment shortcomings that impede agriculture as a route to poverty reduction. Since many of these shortcomings require policy improvements at a country level rather than a global one, they argue for a country-by-country analysis of the potential poverty impacts of biofuels. This would consider, among other things, land administration systems, market coordination and prioritising investment in biodiesel, as this 'generates more labour, has lower transportation costs and uses simpler technology'.[81]
Biofuel prices
Retail, at the pump prices, including U.S. subsidies, Federal and state motor taxes, B2/B5 prices for low-level Biodiesel (B2-B5) are lower than petroleum diesel by about 12 cents, and B20 blends are the same per unit of volume as petrodiesel.[82]
Due to the 1/3 lower energy content of ethanol fuel, even the heavily-subsidized net cost to drive a specific distance in flexible-fuel vehicles is higher than current gasoline prices.
Energy efficiency and energy balance of biofuels
This article needs additional citations for verification. |
Production of biofuels from raw materials requires energy (for farming, transport and conversion to final product, and the production / application of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides). We cannot continue stripping ecosystems of large quantities of biomass year-after-year, without environmental consequences.[83]
The level of energy expenditure varies by location: more-intensive, high-yield, genetically-engineered crop agricultural regimes such, as those found in Western countries, are more energy and irrigation intensive. The more machinery is used for farming, the greater the energy expended in the process; developing countries tend to have less-energy-intensive, lower-yield, agricultural methods.
It is possible to produce biomass without incurring large agricultural energy costs: for example, wild-harvesting grass and wood byproducts from established forests can be done without much energy input. However, the yield of biomass from such resources is not consistent or large enough to support biofuel manufacture on a large scale. Producing biofuels from cellulose is more energy intensive than from sugar and starch foods, like corn and soy, which negatively impact food supply.
The energy balance of a biofuel is determined by the amount of energy put into the manufacture of fuel compared to the amount of energy released when it is burned in a vehicle. This varies by feedstock and according to the assumptions used. Biodiesel made from sunflowers may produce only 0.46 times the input rate of fuel energy.[84] Biodiesel made from soybeans may produce 3.2 times the input rate of fossil fuels.[85] This compares to 0.805 for gasoline and 0.843 for diesel made from petroleum.[86] Biofuels may require higher energy input per unit of BTU energy content produced than fossil fuels: petroleum can be pumped out of the ground and processed more efficiently than biofuels can be grown and processed. However, this is not necessarily a reason to use oil instead of biofuels, nor does it have an impact on the environmental benefits provided by a given biofuel.
Other factors connected to energy balance include a) cost and b) environmental impact. High energy impacts do not necessarily mean that the resulting fuel will be bad for the environment: energy can be derived from renewable resources to power biofuel manufacture.
Energy balance is not necessarily a measure of a good biofuel. Biofuels must eventually become cost-effective without heavy subsidies: affordable, lower total cost per unit of distance, environmentally sustainable, abundant, and provide lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (all things considered) than fossil fuels. As fossil fuel peak oil supply declines, prices increase, and biofuel technology (like collocation) improves, progress toward these challenging goals should slowly improve.
Energy balance/ efficiency of conversion is relevant when considering how best to use a given amount of biomass resources. For example, given limited resources should biomass be converted into heat and power or liquid transport fuels? Looking at energy balance and the efficiency of energy conversion can help to use biomass resources efficiently and with maximum environmental gain.
Studies have been done that calculate energy balances for biofuel production. Some of these show large differences depending on the biomass feedstock used and location.[87]
To explain one specific example, a June 17, 2006 editorial in the Wall. St. Journal stated, "The most widely cited research on this subject comes from Cornell's David Pimental and Berkeley's Ted Patzek. They've found that it takes more than a gallon of fossil fuel to make one gallon of ethanol — 29% more. That's because it takes enormous amounts of fossil-fuel energy to grow corn (using fertilizer and irrigation), to transport the crops and then to turn that corn into ethanol."[88]
The energy balance is more favourable for biofuels made from crops grown in subtropical or tropical areas than those made from crops grown in temperate areas, where there is snow on the ground part of the year, and the growing season is short. This is largely due to the increased yield of biomass from crops in areas that receive more annual sunlight, with a year-round growing season (as in equatorial Brazil).
Life cycle assessments of biofuel production show that under certain circumstances, biofuels produce only limited savings in energy and greenhouse gas emissions. Fertiliser inputs and transportation of biomass across large distances can reduce the GHG savings achieved. The location of biofuel processing plants can be planned to minimize the need for transport, and agricultural regimes can be developed to limit the amount of fertiliser used for biomass production. A European study on the greenhouse gas emissions found that well-to-wheel (WTW) CO2 emissions of biodiesel from seed crops such as rapeseed could be almost as high as fossil diesel. It showed a similar result for bio-ethanol from starch crops, which could have almost as many WTW CO2 emissions as fossil petrol. This study showed that second generation biofuels have far lower WTW CO2 emissions.[89]
Other independent LCA studies show that biofuels save around 50% of the CO2 emissions of the equivalent fossil fuels. This can be increased to 80-90% GHG emissions savings if second generation processes or reduced fertiliser growing regimes are used. Further GHG savings can be achieved by using by-products to provide heat, such as using bagasse to power ethanol production from sugarcane.[90]
Collocation of synergistic processing plants can enhance efficiency. One example is to use the exhaust heat from an industrial process for ethanol production, which can then recycle cooler processing water, instead of evaporating hot water that warms the atmosphere.[91]
Biofuels and solar energy efficiency
Biofuels from plant materials convert energy that was originally captured from solar energy via photosynthesis. A comparison of conversion efficiency from solar to usable energy (taking into account the whole energy budgets) shows that photovoltaics are 100 times more efficient than corn ethanol[92] and 10 times more efficient than the best biofuel.[93]
Centralized vs. decentralized production
This article needs additional citations for verification. |
There is debate around the best model for production.
One side sees centralized vegetable oil fuel production offering
- efficiency
- greater potential for fuel standardization
- ease of administrating taxes
- possibility for rapid expansion
The other side of the argument points to
- increased fuel security
- rural job creation
- less of a 'monopolistic' market due to the increased number of producers
- benefits to local economy as a greater part of any profits stay in the local economy
- decreased transportation of feedstock and end product
- consumers close to and able to observe the effects of production
The majority of established biofuel markets have followed the centralised model with a few small or micro producers holding a minor segment of the market. A noticeable exception to this has been the pure plant oil (PPO) market in Germany which grew exponentially until the beginning of 2008 when increasing feedstock prices and the introduction of fuel duty combined to stifle the market. Fuel was produced in hundreds of small oil mills distributed throughout Germany often run as part of farm businesses.
Initially fuel quality could be variable but as the market matured new technologies were developed that made significantly improvements. As the technologies surrounding this fuel improved usage and production rapidly increased with rapeseed oil PPO forming a large segment of transportation biofuels consumed in 2007. [94] [95]
See also
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/24/Wikinews-logo.svg/40px-Wikinews-logo.svg.png)
|
|
References
- ^ "SmartWay Grow & Go".
- ^ freetheplant.net
- ^ National Geographic, Green Dreams, Oct 2007
- ^ [1]
- ^ European Environment Agency (2006) How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? EEA Report no. 7
- ^ Marshall, A. T. (2007) Bioenergy from Waste: A Growing Source of Power, Waste Management World Magazine, April, p34-37
- ^ a b IPCC Third Assessment Report, accessed August 31, 2007.
- ^ Non-CO2 Gases Economic Analysis and Inventory: Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed August 31, 2007
- ^ Frank Keppler, John T. G. Hamilton, Marc Bra, and Thomas Röckmann (2006). "Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions". Nature. 439: 187–191. doi:10.1038/nature04420.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ UN biofuels report
- ^ http://www.biodiesel.de/
- ^ Welcome to Biodiesel Filling Stations
- ^ ButylFuel,LLC Main Page
- ^ Andrew Bounds (September 10 2007). ""OECD warns against biofuels subsidies"". Financial Times. Retrieved 2008-03-07.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ "With only 2/3 the energy of gasoline, ethanol costs more per mile". zFacts.com. 27 Apr 2007. Retrieved 2008-03-07.
- ^ Hydrogen Solar home
- ^ greenfuelonline.com
- ^ http://www.renewable-energy-world.com/articles/print_screen.cfm?ARTICLE_ID=308325 [dead link]
- ^ Chris Somerville. ""Development of Cellulosic Biofuels"" (PDF). U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ a b Eviana Hartman (January 6, 2008). ""A Promising Oil Alternative: Algae Energy"". Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ Globeco biodegradable bio-diesel
- ^ Friends of Ethanol.com biodegradable ethanol
- ^ Low Cost Algae Production System Introduced
- ^ IEA bioenergy
- ^ "Press Conference Launching International Biofuels Forum". United Nations Department of Public Information. 2 March 2007. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
- ^ Roger Harrabin (14 January 2008). ""EU rethinks biofuels guidelines"". BBC News.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|accessyear=
,|accessdaymonth=
, and|accessmonthday=
(help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ "EU biofuels barometer: Germany & France in the lead". July 30, 2007. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Prime Minister's Office Commission on Oil Independence. "Making Sweden an OIL-FREE Society". Retrieved 2007-02-13.
- ^ Richard Black (14 January 2008). ""Biofuels 'are not a magic bullet'"". BBC News. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ ""Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges"". The Royal Society. 14 Jan 2008. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Press release from the Presidencia De La República de Colombia "COLOMBIA SE ALISTA PARA ENTRAR A LA ERA DEL ETANOL"
- ^ ethanol fuel
- ^ "Bush Signs Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007".
- ^ "Food Prices: Cheap No More".
- ^ G.M. Buys Stake in Ethanol Made From Waste By MATTHEW L. WALD Published: January 14, 2008 New York Times Link
- ^ Ethanol India website
- ^ See Jörg Peters and Sascha Thielmann (2008) Promoting Biofuels: Implications for Developing Countries, Ruhr Economic Papers #38 ([www.rwi-essen.de] for download)
- ^ world resources institute document on wood fuels (PDF)
- ^ Scientific American
- ^ [2]
- ^ [3]
- ^ Nexant Chem Systems study
- ^ Grunwald, Michael: ‘’The Clean Energy Scam’’ TIME Magazine. Mar. 27, 2008. [4]
- ^ Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security
- ^ Biofuels are part of the solution
- ^ As Biofuels Catch On, Next Task Is to Deal With Environmental, Economic Impact
- ^ ""NGO has biofuel concerns"". BBC News. 01 November, 2007. Retrieved 2008-01-20.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ Green Dreams J.K. Bourne JR, R. Clark, National Geographic Magazine, October 2007 p. 41, Article
- ^ "The Economist – The End Of Cheap Food".
- ^ [5] “Carbon negative energy to reverse global warming” (a posting to Energy Resources Group on Yahoo). Report on the symposium (EACU) in 2004 at the University of Georgia at Athens (Georgia, USA). Several scientists from very diverse disciplins: chemistry, archeology, physics, anthropology, microbiology, pedology, agronomy, researchers in renewable energies, and representatives for the DOE (Department of Environment), USDA and industry. Aim: to observe the evidences of massive utilisations of carbon in history, make a synopsis on present research, and study how carbon-negative energy can be economically deployed today” (See also [6])
- ^ Concawe European WTW study
- ^ "N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels".
- ^ Smith, Lewis (The Times) (2007, Sept.). "Study: Biofuels May Produce More Greenhouse Gas Than Oil" (HTML). Retrieved 2007-09-24.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ "Biofuels Deemed a Greenhouse Threat".
- ^ a b Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt Joseph Fargione, Jason Hill, David Tilman, Stephen Polasky, Peter Hawthorne Published Online February 7, 2008 Science doi:10.1126/science.1152747
- ^ Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land Use Change Timothy Searchinger, Ralph Heimlich, R. A. Houghton, Fengxia Dong, Amani Elobeid, Jacinto Fabiosa, Simla Tokgoz, Dermot Hayes, Tun-Hsiang Yu Published Online February 7, 2008 Science doi:10.1126/science.1151861
- ^ Growing Sustainable Biofuels: Common Sense on Biofuels, part 2
- ^ Winning the Oil Endgame p. 107.
- ^ Biofuels are part of the solution
- ^ "National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory". U.S. Department of Agriculture. 03/05/2008. Retrieved 2008-03-07.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, Extinction, Random House, New York (1981) ISBN 0-394-51312-6
- ^ "Once a Dream Fuel, Palm Oil May Be an Eco-Nightmare - New York Times".
- ^ [7] “Prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century”, by Bruno Glaser at the Institute of Soil Science and Soil Geography, University of Bayreuth (see the “Terra Preta Web Site”). Extract available here. Published online December 20, 2006 in Philosophic Transactions Royal Society B (2007) 362, 187–196. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006. 1978. This article studies the evidences concerning the process of generation of Terra preta as well as the reasons why its organic matter's and nutrients' retention is so superior to the surrounding soils.
- ^ To calculate this relationship, one has to take into account that irrigated corn needs about 560 cubic meters (2.1m gallons) of water per ton of corn (as quoted inEco-World. Ed Ring:Is bio-fuel water positive? June 4th, 2007 using estimates from the University of Colorado and UNESCO, as well as a clarification by David Nielsen, Research Agronomist, USDA-ARS, Akron, Colorado, posted on July 19, 2007.) A good ethanol yield is about 480 galons per acre per year, and a typical corn yield is 5.6 tons per acre per year. Assuming that half the crop water needs can be met through rainfall, this would mean that still 1,570 cubic meter (1.57m liter) - 280 cubic meter of water per ton, multiplied by 5.6 tons per acre - of irrigation water are needed per acre per year to produce 1,817 liter (480 galons) of ethanol.
- ^ The Economist, March 1st 2008, Ethanol and water: don't mix, p. 36
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
indigenous
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "U.N. raises possible negative impact of biofuels on environment, food security".
- ^ IPCC's Mitigation of Climate Change report negative on biofuels.
- ^ Biofuels no panacea (PDF).
- ^ Biofuels — Transporting Us to a Fossil-Free Future?.
- ^ Governmental (OECD) organisations against unsustainable biofuels.
- ^ Friends of the Earth, Oxfam, ... preferring jatropha over palm oil.
- ^ Environmental organisations against non-sustainable biofuels 1.
- ^ Environmental organisations against non-sustainable biofuels 2.
- ^ Zero Carbon Environmental Organisation.
- ^ The Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels: Ensuring Biofuels Deliver on their Promise of Sustainability
- ^ Malaysian Palm Oil Council.
- ^ Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels website.
- ^ BBC News.
- ^ Agrofuels — towards a reality check in nine key areas.
- ^ "Biofuels, Agriculture and Poverty Reduction" (PDF). Overseas Development Institute. 2007.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|accessyear=
ignored (|access-date=
suggested) (help) - ^ ""Clean Cities Alternative Fuel Price Report"" (PDF). U.S. Dept. of Energy. July 2007. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Cellulosic ethanol will not save us
- ^ Pimentel, D. (2005). "Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower" (PDF). Natural Resources Research. 14 (1): 65–75. doi:10.1007/s11053-005-4679-8. Retrieved 2008-01-25.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ John Sheehan (1998). Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel (PDF). Golden, Colorado 80401-3393: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/SR-580-24089. Retrieved 2008-01-24.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: location (link) (see page 33) - ^ Shapouri (2002), The Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol: An Update (PDF), USDA, Agricultural Economic Report No. 813, retrieved 2008-01-25(see page 8)
- ^ "Biofuel" does not necessarily mean ecologically friendly (EMPA report May 2007).
- ^ An Energy Field of Dreams The Wall St. Journal, June 17, 2006
- ^ European VIEWLS Biofuel report p.28 fig.4 (PDF).
- ^ Concawe Well to Wheels LCA for biofuels.
- ^ ""FPL Energy finds partner for citrus-peel-to-ethanol plant"". Biomass Magazine. October 2007. Retrieved 2008-03-07.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ Markman, Jon, "Shuck the ethanol and let solar shine" 10/11/2007
- ^ "Biofuel vs. Photovoltaics" EcoWorld
- ^ Oil Processing in Decentralised Oil Mills
- ^ Reports on markets for vegetable oils at UFOP