Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
1 user left. rm 186.77.204.176 (blocked 1 day by Daniel Case (AO ACB)). |
Daniel Case (talk | contribs) →User-reported: ns |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
List begins BELOW this line --> |
List begins BELOW this line --> |
||
*{{vandal|Null It}} – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Smuckola|Smuckola]][[User talk:Smuckola|(talk)]]</span> 18:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC) |
*{{vandal|Null It}} – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Smuckola|Smuckola]][[User talk:Smuckola|(talk)]]</span> 18:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
::{{AIV|ns}} And really, I'm not sure his actions are vandalism. They're a little drastic for a new editor, but his reasons are policy-based. They deserve discussion, not a report here. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:19, 19 July 2021
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 12:37 on 25 August 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Reports
- QuackPop (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Level 2, since the filter already warned them once. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- 112.209.31.96 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jessegardnernz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:84:837c:9300:cc6d:daf8:cd1e:d068 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- 117.222.236.237 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- 117.222.236.237 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- 114.10.103.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- 114.10.103.133 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Null It (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. — Smuckola(talk) 18:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. And really, I'm not sure his actions are vandalism. They're a little drastic for a new editor, but his reasons are policy-based. They deserve discussion, not a report here. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)