Jump to content

Talk:Rabies: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 81: Line 81:


I don't think I am qualified to discuss this, so I won't.[[User:Kylesenior|Kylesenior]] ([[User talk:Kylesenior|talk]]) 04:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't think I am qualified to discuss this, so I won't.[[User:Kylesenior|Kylesenior]] ([[User talk:Kylesenior|talk]]) 04:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


:This source accounts for twelve.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Souza |first1=Aaron de |last2=Madhusudana |first2=Shampur Narayan |title=Survival from rabies encephalitis |journal=Journal of the Neurological Sciences |date=15 April 2014 |volume=339 |issue=1 |pages=8–14 |doi=10.1016/j.jns.2014.02.013 |url=https://www.jns-journal.com/article/S0022-510X(14)00099-9/fulltext |language=English |issn=0022-510X}}</ref> Then this source documents the 13th case.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Weyer |first1=Jacqueline |last2=Msimang-Dermaux |first2=Veerle |last3=Paweska |first3=Janusz T |last4=le Roux |first4=Kevin |last5=Govender |first5=Premi |last6=Coertse |first6=Jessica |last7=Markotter |first7=Wanda |last8=Nel |first8=Louis H |last9=Blumberg |first9=Lucille H |title=A case of human survival of rabies, South Africa |journal=Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases |date=9 June 2016 |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=66–68 |doi=10.1080/23120053.2016.1128151 |url=https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.1080/23120053.2016.1128151 |language=en |issn=2312-0053}}</ref> The source you're talking about<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Manoj |first1=S. |last2=Mukherjee |first2=A. |last3=Johri |first3=S. |last4=Kumar |first4=K. V. S. Hari |title=Recovery from rabies, a universally fatal disease |journal=Military Medical Research |date=15 July 2016 |volume=3 |pages=21 |doi=10.1186/s40779-016-0089-y |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947331/ |issn=2095-7467}}</ref> documents the fourteenth case. You are correct the authors cite the paper that reports twelve cases. The publication dates for the papers documenting the 13th and 14th cases are only one month apart. I would guess the authors of the latter paper were aware of the 13th case, but that paper hadn't been published yet for them to cite so they cited the next best thing. [[User:Sizeofint|Sizeofint]] ([[User talk:Sizeofint|talk]]) 03:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist|section}}

Revision as of 03:43, 16 October 2021

Template:Vital article

Former good articleRabies was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 21, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 October 2018 and 12 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gikdavis (article contribs).

Tragedy in Germany: six transplants have rabies

Terrible tragedy looms in Germany: more recent news say all six transplants have rabies now. Added to the article. See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4271453.stm

Mentioned in FoxTrot

This article was mentioned in a FoxTrot comic strip (the image) about Wikipedia today (May 7 2005), though it obviously didn't get the same attention that Warthog did as a result [1]. Just thought I'd mention it. --Phoenix-forgotten 17:52, 2005 May 7 (UTC)

Rabies Survivors

The article says that there were 14 rabies survivors, but the first scientific source cited says four, not fourteen, and the second one, while it says 13 (presumably plus the case described as 14), gives a citation for an article that doesn't actually support that number. [This paper] gives "seven", but as noted in the paper, two of those succumbed within 2-4 years after "recovering" from the disease. I added a Citation Needed tag. Titanium Dragon (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 September 2021

In the section Treatment > After Onset, there is a small grammatical mistake / typo.

It reads:

" The protocol has be criticised in the journal Asian Biomedicine,"

I think it should be changed to:

" The protocol has been criticised in the journal Asian Biomedicine," Stuartws777 (talk) 20:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Rabies transmission into Rabies

No real point in keeping Rabies transmission as a standalone article. It is poorly sourced and redundant with Rabies § Transmission. Maybe a few sentences could be lifted and copied here but not much else. JBchrch talk 02:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago rabies case

Unreliable source, but an RS may eventually confirm. [3] Sizeofint (talk) 18:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed: Number of survivors

Someone added the citation needed tag to the statement "14 people have survived rabies". The correct format is to add the disputed tag instead. I have quoted the person's comment verbatim:

First scientific source says four survivors, not fourteen; second one gives a number but the source it cited for the number gives a different one.

I don't think I am qualified to discuss this, so I won't.Kylesenior (talk) 04:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This source accounts for twelve.[1] Then this source documents the 13th case.[2] The source you're talking about[3] documents the fourteenth case. You are correct the authors cite the paper that reports twelve cases. The publication dates for the papers documenting the 13th and 14th cases are only one month apart. I would guess the authors of the latter paper were aware of the 13th case, but that paper hadn't been published yet for them to cite so they cited the next best thing. Sizeofint (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Souza, Aaron de; Madhusudana, Shampur Narayan (15 April 2014). "Survival from rabies encephalitis". Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 339 (1): 8–14. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.02.013. ISSN 0022-510X.
  2. ^ Weyer, Jacqueline; Msimang-Dermaux, Veerle; Paweska, Janusz T; le Roux, Kevin; Govender, Premi; Coertse, Jessica; Markotter, Wanda; Nel, Louis H; Blumberg, Lucille H (9 June 2016). "A case of human survival of rabies, South Africa". Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases. 31 (2): 66–68. doi:10.1080/23120053.2016.1128151. ISSN 2312-0053.
  3. ^ Manoj, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Johri, S.; Kumar, K. V. S. Hari (15 July 2016). "Recovery from rabies, a universally fatal disease". Military Medical Research. 3: 21. doi:10.1186/s40779-016-0089-y. ISSN 2095-7467.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)