Talk:Deaths in 2023: Difference between revisions
CrosswalkX (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
:{{done}} by someone. [[User:Marbe166|Marbe166]] ([[User talk:Marbe166|talk]]) 17:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
:{{done}} by someone. [[User:Marbe166|Marbe166]] ([[User talk:Marbe166|talk]]) 17:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Steve Harwell is missing Pororo's Racing Adventure and Shrek songs. == |
|||
To the Wikipedia staff and users, I'm sorry to hear about Steve Harwell's death. I have been to Steve Harwells final concert at the Orem Utah Scera Shell concert, he did play every popular like "Allstar" but he skipped 2 songs "Everything's Just Crazy", "Beside Myself" and I talked to him and showed him a picture of Pororo's Racing Adventure 2013 on my phone and he gave me a high five. That was the last time I saw him face to face. |
|||
Anyways, where are the songs like "Allstar", "Everything's Just Crazy", "Beside Myself"? Also, where's Rat Race 2001 film cameo he was in? The death section for Steve Harwell is incomplete. Is it possible to add 3 to 4 credits to his page on September 4 2023? Let me know, and I'll try to be more reasonable in my talk page. I wish the Wikipedia staff would consider increasing the 3 credit limit policy to 4 credit limit policy for earlier famous singers, actors in the earlier death years. [[User:CrosswalkX|CrosswalkX]] ([[User talk:CrosswalkX|talk]]) 17:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:46, 4 September 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deaths in 2023 redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 40 days ![]() |
![]() | You can help by finding people who recently died via Wikidata reports: with an English Wikipedia article or without an English Wikipedia article. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | On 28 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to List of deaths in 2023. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Deaths needing a better source
I've added a few hundred missing deaths over the past month. There are a few for whom I couldn't find a non-social media source. Perhaps somebody else here might have better luck? (feel free to edit below if a source is found or add to the list if it's helpful) Star Garnet (talk) 06:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) Updated July 5. Star Garnet (talk) 17:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC) And August 5. Star Garnet (talk) 22:08, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
Section for delayed reported deaths
Hi, I always check DEATHS IN 2023 to find out who dies. WHile I do check usually a week back I think a page or section for delayed celeb deaths is needed. I use this example that I just found out about on another page. https://obscurevideoanddvd.blogspot.com/2023/08/rip-sharon-farrell-1940-2023.html
Who would think to look back to May for a recently reported death. So I would suggest a subpage or page for notable deaths that are not reported till 2 weeks or more later. I would say keep the death up for 2 weeks then it can be deleted. 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 15:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Why would we put in a name that passed away months earlier just because someone might’ve first heard about the death months later? It’s really not a big leap to go “oh she died in May, I’ll go look at her entry in Deaths in May 2023”. A whole subsection for “delayed” deaths is worthless. Rusted AutoParts 15:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a news update facility and never has been. If you add months to your watchlist you'll find out soon enough, or even research back manually like I and many others do. Ref (chew)(do) 16:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean add months to your watchlist? Also I do disagree to a point with your first line. While not a news update facility it is the internet living encyclopedia. So if you have a topic such as Deaths In 2023 that is updated multiple times a day it becomes a major reference point. Being a major reference point that is updated why would we not update just reported deaths that happened a time ago? Would it really be much work to do a subpage of Late reported deaths? Even more so leaving a link to the persons page up for only 2 weeks? Its not rebulding the whole wikipedia website. For those with the talent I bet they could create the page in less than 5 minutes. Then only the oddly late reported death here & there would even be on the page so very little upkeep. How can you research back manually on something you dont know about? If I didnt go on that other website I would not have known Sharon died. Are you saying there is a tool on wiki that informs people of random deaths? I dont understand the resistance to a simple page? 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- ”Would it really be much work to do a subpage of Late reported deaths?”. There is literally a “Previous Months” subsection at the bottom of the page to guide readers to other months, what are you talking about? Rusted AutoParts 19:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- You are comparing apples to oranges. I am talking about deaths that are just being reported about months later. You are saying just look up previous months deaths. But I am talking about situations such as Sharon Farrell where the person may have died in May but the news was not released till August. 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not comparing anything, I'm highlighting an objective fact. You're asking for a needless page for people who weren't revealed to have died until a period of time later. It's not that highlightable a thing to make an entire Wikipedia article for, nor would it be needing a category. Rusted AutoParts 20:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Surely you know what a watchlist is? Every registered editor has one. In a computer browser the link can be found at the top, third from the right. Ref (chew)(do) 20:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- You are comparing apples to oranges. I am talking about deaths that are just being reported about months later. You are saying just look up previous months deaths. But I am talking about situations such as Sharon Farrell where the person may have died in May but the news was not released till August. 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- ”Would it really be much work to do a subpage of Late reported deaths?”. There is literally a “Previous Months” subsection at the bottom of the page to guide readers to other months, what are you talking about? Rusted AutoParts 19:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean add months to your watchlist? Also I do disagree to a point with your first line. While not a news update facility it is the internet living encyclopedia. So if you have a topic such as Deaths In 2023 that is updated multiple times a day it becomes a major reference point. Being a major reference point that is updated why would we not update just reported deaths that happened a time ago? Would it really be much work to do a subpage of Late reported deaths? Even more so leaving a link to the persons page up for only 2 weeks? Its not rebulding the whole wikipedia website. For those with the talent I bet they could create the page in less than 5 minutes. Then only the oddly late reported death here & there would even be on the page so very little upkeep. How can you research back manually on something you dont know about? If I didnt go on that other website I would not have known Sharon died. Are you saying there is a tool on wiki that informs people of random deaths? I dont understand the resistance to a simple page? 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- “oh she died in May, I’ll go look at her entry in Deaths in May 2023”. Unless you found out how would you know she died? That is the whole point. I dont want to look up the person, I want the news of who died. So a subsection is not worthless if the death was not known about. 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- The three ways you’d find her having died is: through the news, which clearly state she died May 15; her Wiki page, which states based off the news she died May 15; or or someone telling you she died, which will prompt your to do one of the previous options. It’s not difficult so yes, this proposed section is completely worthless. Just view her entry on Deaths in May 2023. Rusted AutoParts 19:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- But the news of her May death was not released till August. Her wiki page NOW says she died in May. Only because the news was released in August. It did not say in June she died in May. I do not get the backlash against a page for late reported deaths. Would a page like that affect you directly? 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- There is zero reason to create another deaths page for people “late reported”, that is really silly. It doesn’t have to directly affect me to declare this. There’s zero point. Rusted AutoParts 20:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Go to Template:Deaths by month and year and add every page to your watchlist. Then as soon as someone is added to any of those months, you will know about it immediately. WWGB (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- But the news of her May death was not released till August. Her wiki page NOW says she died in May. Only because the news was released in August. It did not say in June she died in May. I do not get the backlash against a page for late reported deaths. Would a page like that affect you directly? 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:89C7:4BB7:9469:78BC (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- The three ways you’d find her having died is: through the news, which clearly state she died May 15; her Wiki page, which states based off the news she died May 15; or or someone telling you she died, which will prompt your to do one of the previous options. It’s not difficult so yes, this proposed section is completely worthless. Just view her entry on Deaths in May 2023. Rusted AutoParts 19:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a news update facility and never has been. If you add months to your watchlist you'll find out soon enough, or even research back manually like I and many others do. Ref (chew)(do) 16:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Johnny Johnson
Interested editors may want to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Deaths in March 2023 whether Johnny Johnson meets the criteria for inclusion in these pages. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Pronouncing the two notable occupants as dead (if they were actually IN the aircraft) is not a truthful statement within the entry added recently, as at this post's timestamp, and relies on massive assumptions. Both of the notables' own articles state "presumed dead", and the event article itself states that there are "unconfirmed reports" that the two were on the transport at all. This is a clear case of jumping the gun for this list of what are supposed to be reliably sourced deaths. If you can't accept my recent change to the lead-in used in the Deaths in 2023 list, then the whole entry should be removed until deaths ARE confirmed - unequivocably and reliably so. Ref (chew)(do) 19:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yevgeny Prigozhin just died. Carman9990 (talk) 21:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Still not confirmed at his article. Ref (chew)(do) 00:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Updated source for our page. I don't care about individuals' pages. Wyliepedia @ 00:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- It is frankly ridiculous that the deaths of Prighozhin and Utkin are being left off this page - every single respectabele media outlet is reporting on it, Prighozhin's own Wagner-group is confirming it, public gestures of mourning in Russia have been reported, world leaders are commenting on it, the Russian air travel authorities are reporting that the two were on the passenger list and there is absolutely no evidence to give the slightest creedence to assumptions they weren't on board. Leaving this out is just plain silly, and goes against common sense and sensible application of Wikipedia guidelines. This kind of thing is harming Wikipedia. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Entries here are based on absolutely certain facts supported by reliable sources. Currently (see my timestamp), although the esteemed BBC seem certain that the notables have died, other respected outlets are waiting to see. As should we. Ref (chew)(do) 08:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- And that is exactly what I mean by abusing or misapplying Wikipedia policies. There is no reasonable doubt. There are confirmations from the aviation authorities and from the Wagner group itself. These are good enough for gold-standard news media, including the BBC as you mention. Wiki guidelines are now misapplied to keep this out - and why? There is no good reason. It's just another example of the decentralized bureaucracy that has formed and is seriously harming Wikipedia - the way guidelines are bent and selectively applied for the apparent sake of bureaucracy itself. Disturbing. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I mean, let's look at this in the abstract: a plane crash has been confirmed. The fact that 10 dead have been recovered and that the authorities state there are no survivors has been confirmed. The passenger and crew list has been released by aviation authorities, and it contains 10 names. The organization Prighozhin led confirms his death. All of this is reported by numerous sources considered undoubtedly reliable by Wikipedia. There is no way this would be considered insufficient sourcing for reporting the death of anyone else. The only argument not to list Prighozhin and Utkin is that the Russian *government* has not given confirmation. Even though there is no reason to assume they ever will/would explicitly do so. This is Kafka-level bizarre. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Putin himself has given condolences to Prigozhin's family, and speaks of him in the past tense. Tenorlove (talk) 21:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with the IP. The deaths were sourced here by a reputable news agency. If any agency is mistaken and said entries are found to be alive (no information has yet to contradict it), then we can take it out. We're going on 48 hours after the fact. I understand other agencies are waiting to see, mainly because the "assassination" speculation, but, again, that's not what this page is about. Also, the BBC link above and I used on the page constantly updates. Ten people are still dead, including these two. Wyliepedia @ 08:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Assumptions and second-guessing have no place in what we do here. Ref (chew)(do) 16:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- May one ask what would constitute as sufficient proof? Hexmaster.se (talk) 21:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- This whole argument against publishing the notable victims of the plane crash is bordering on conspiracy theory. What real evidence is there that the victims are not as claimed by the large majority of international major media? And even if such survivor theories turn out to be true, all of us will be surprised to some extent and that is the proper time to remove them from this list of notable deaths. Wholeflaffer (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Assumptions and second-guessing have no place in what we do here. Ref (chew)(do) 16:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I mean, let's look at this in the abstract: a plane crash has been confirmed. The fact that 10 dead have been recovered and that the authorities state there are no survivors has been confirmed. The passenger and crew list has been released by aviation authorities, and it contains 10 names. The organization Prighozhin led confirms his death. All of this is reported by numerous sources considered undoubtedly reliable by Wikipedia. There is no way this would be considered insufficient sourcing for reporting the death of anyone else. The only argument not to list Prighozhin and Utkin is that the Russian *government* has not given confirmation. Even though there is no reason to assume they ever will/would explicitly do so. This is Kafka-level bizarre. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- And that is exactly what I mean by abusing or misapplying Wikipedia policies. There is no reasonable doubt. There are confirmations from the aviation authorities and from the Wagner group itself. These are good enough for gold-standard news media, including the BBC as you mention. Wiki guidelines are now misapplied to keep this out - and why? There is no good reason. It's just another example of the decentralized bureaucracy that has formed and is seriously harming Wikipedia - the way guidelines are bent and selectively applied for the apparent sake of bureaucracy itself. Disturbing. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Entries here are based on absolutely certain facts supported by reliable sources. Currently (see my timestamp), although the esteemed BBC seem certain that the notables have died, other respected outlets are waiting to see. As should we. Ref (chew)(do) 08:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- It is frankly ridiculous that the deaths of Prighozhin and Utkin are being left off this page - every single respectabele media outlet is reporting on it, Prighozhin's own Wagner-group is confirming it, public gestures of mourning in Russia have been reported, world leaders are commenting on it, the Russian air travel authorities are reporting that the two were on the passenger list and there is absolutely no evidence to give the slightest creedence to assumptions they weren't on board. Leaving this out is just plain silly, and goes against common sense and sensible application of Wikipedia guidelines. This kind of thing is harming Wikipedia. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Updated source for our page. I don't care about individuals' pages. Wyliepedia @ 00:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Still not confirmed at his article. Ref (chew)(do) 00:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
High profile but uncertain? (Yevgeny Prigozhin)
[2]. @Folengo . I was expecting to see Prigozhin mentioned on Main Page in Recent Deaths. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- This is not the place to discuss the Main Page. WWGB (talk) 07:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- That's as may be - if deaths are not confirmed beyond doubt, it certainly won't appear there, as it shouldn't here. Ref (chew)(do) 08:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- NYT clearly says his death is unconfirmed. Official confirmation may be quite far away and of course we are not a news agency, so no need to jump the gun. --Folengo (talk) 09:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reliable sources around the world, and Putin himself, have acknowledged the deaths. We follow reliable sources; we are not bound to The New York Times. I don't mind "presumed dead" in the stem of the listing if that softens the statement. WWGB (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- NYT clearly says his death is unconfirmed. Official confirmation may be quite far away and of course we are not a news agency, so no need to jump the gun. --Folengo (talk) 09:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
I think it seems strange to use "presumed dead" in their article but list them as confirmed deaths here. Has that ever been done before? We need to make up our minds. Are they dead or not? Personally I don't care which as long as we are consequent here and on their articles. DrKilleMoff (talk) 17:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- One of my previous edits added "presumed dead" instead of "dead", but that was changed some time ago. Ref (chew)(do) 08:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Deaths now confirmed by Russia.[3] WWGB (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks - it's a crying shame that the NY Times source confirming their deaths is paywalled. Ref (chew)(do) 21:16, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Deaths now confirmed by Russia.[3] WWGB (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Straw poll
By my count, the current tally is 6:3 in favour of listing the deaths:
- For: 82.176.221.176, Badmotorfinger, Tenorlove, Wholeflaffer, WWGB, Wyliepedia
- Against: DrKilleMoff, Folengo, Refsworldlee
Requested move 28 August 2023
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. It's snowing (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 01:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Deaths in 2023 → List of deaths in 2023 – Per WP:NCLIST, list articles should generally have titles beginning with "List of". I don't see any reason for this article to be an exception to that rule. Chessrat (talk, contributions) 16:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, in the first instance simply because anyone visiting the page will already be aware that it will probably be a list, of notable dead people, and that it is an unnecessary elongation of a succinct title. In addition to that perhaps flimsy rationale, it follows that the many years/months of archived lists would need to be renamed in line with this change i.e. Deaths in July 2023 to List of deaths in July 2023, and so on. Ref (chew)(do) 17:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:CONSISTENT with Deaths in August 2022, Deaths in June 2019, etc. See List of deaths by year (I'm not sure why 2023 has its own page and other years seem not to, but maybe it's because it's the current year?). WPscatter t/c 17:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - the consistency argument is reasonable- in the event of this RM supporting a move, I would also propose moving all of those other list of deaths articles. Chessrat (talk, contributions) 18:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose as needless. My stance for every one of these discussions is if it isn't broken, it doesn't need fixing. Rusted AutoParts 18:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - If it aint broke dont fix it! 2603:7000:BE00:4C1:942A:ECFA:C7C1:6653 (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose as needless. You know what they say: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Hansen SebastianTalk 19:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Support - I used to click on "List of Deaths in 2023" (for example), only to find it was a list of wikilinks to people who had died in specific months of a given year, followed by the "Deaths in (year in question)" wikilink. If this wikilink were a more faithful representation of what it is supposed to be, it would supply us with the information that Deaths in 2023 (for example) currently supplies. YTKJ (talk) 20:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - If it ain't broke don't fix it! Marbe166 (talk) 20:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Marbe166. This is needless, no point IMO. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - How many times do we have to have this discussion? There's nothing wrong with naming it "Deaths in 2023". 142.161.36.210 21:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Strong oppose What is this, the second or third time this year? Stop beating a dead horse. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 22:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - Third time this has come up this year. Answer is still no.SunnyDoo, 22:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - Why create more unnecessary work to change every prior Deaths in (year)? As it's been said before, if it ain't broke, don't fix it! Erasmussen (talk) 23:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Dead as per list but alive as per article
This death is nowhere to be found in our article about Aparna Nair. Do we have policy on that, i.e. listing a death here while the article remains untouched? SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is not uncommon for the deceased to appear here before the death is reported in the deceased's article. WWGB (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- And, in cases like this, a sourced report of death, it would be suitable to update the article of the person in question, wouldn't it? --Marbe166 (talk) 11:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes it would, for the person listing the death here to do so, not leave that for someone else to clean up. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- And, in cases like this, a sourced report of death, it would be suitable to update the article of the person in question, wouldn't it? --Marbe166 (talk) 11:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- See Aparna P Nair. Thanks. Wyliepedia @ 16:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 September 2023
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Lefty Sm, 31, Mexican rapper (murdered by gunshot Sept 3 2023) 187.190.198.188 (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 23:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Miklós Hanó (Fidesz politican, Békéscsaba)
Miklós Hanó (Fidesz politican) is died in September 3, 2023, aged 67. Here is a source https://behir.hu/elhunyt-hano-miklos-bekescsaba-alpolgarmestere KovZXad1970 (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Done by someone. Marbe166 (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Steve Harwell is missing Pororo's Racing Adventure and Shrek songs.
To the Wikipedia staff and users, I'm sorry to hear about Steve Harwell's death. I have been to Steve Harwells final concert at the Orem Utah Scera Shell concert, he did play every popular like "Allstar" but he skipped 2 songs "Everything's Just Crazy", "Beside Myself" and I talked to him and showed him a picture of Pororo's Racing Adventure 2013 on my phone and he gave me a high five. That was the last time I saw him face to face.
Anyways, where are the songs like "Allstar", "Everything's Just Crazy", "Beside Myself"? Also, where's Rat Race 2001 film cameo he was in? The death section for Steve Harwell is incomplete. Is it possible to add 3 to 4 credits to his page on September 4 2023? Let me know, and I'll try to be more reasonable in my talk page. I wish the Wikipedia staff would consider increasing the 3 credit limit policy to 4 credit limit policy for earlier famous singers, actors in the earlier death years. CrosswalkX (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect-Class biography articles
- NA-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- Redirect-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- NA-Class Years articles
- Low-importance Years articles
- NA-Class Years articles of Low-importance
- Redirect-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report