Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

Usernames for administrator attention

This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.

This page was last updated at 15:22 on 11 July 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Bot-reported

• EfaGwyn (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "fag" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

  Not fag. but spam appears to be incoming from the paid editing declaration. Secretlondon (talk) 09:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

• Ηλίας1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

  This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

Leonardo DiCaprio (talk · contribs) I left a note on her user talk page advising her to change her name. To sound less bite-y (WP:BITE), I asked her to save it for the famous (not real) Leonardo. Is a polite message and block the right thing to do? Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 19:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC) I have studied WP:U which states "You should not edit under the real name of a well-known living person unless it is your real name, and you either are that person, or you make it clear that you are not. Such usernames may be blocked as a precaution, until it can be confirmed that the user in question is using their real name." So this person makes it clear that she is a fan and not the famous Leonardo. Do we let her keep her username??? Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)