European Coal and Steel Community: Difference between revisions
clean up + reference formating fixes using AWB |
Robert1886 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''European Coal and Steel Community''' ('''ECSC''') was a six-nation [[international organisation]] during the [[Cold War]] and |
The '''European Coal and Steel Community''' ('''ECSC''') was a six-nation [[international organisation]] serving to unify Western Europe during the [[Cold War]] and creating the foundation for European democracy and the modern-day developments of the [[European Union]]. The ECSC was the first organisation to be based on the principles of [[supranational]]ism. These principles were enunciated by Robert Schuman (French Prime Minister and Foreign Minister) at the foundation of the Council of Europe in May 1949, in speeches around Europe and at the United Nations in 1948 and 1949. |
||
The ECSC was first proposed by [[Minister of Foreign Affairs (France)|French foreign minister]] [[Robert Schuman]] on [[9 May]] [[1950]] as a way to prevent further war between [[France]] and [[Germany]]. |
The ECSC was first proposed by [[Minister of Foreign Affairs (France)|French foreign minister]] [[Robert Schuman]] on [[9 May]] [[1950]] as a way to prevent further war between [[France]] and [[Germany]]. He declared his aim was to 'make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible.' The means to do so, Europe's first supranational Community, was formally established in 1951 by the [[Treaty of Paris (1951)|Treaty of Paris]], signed not only by France and Germany, but also by [[Italy]] and the three [[Benelux]] states: [[Belgium]], [[Luxembourg]] and the [[Netherlands]]. Between these states the ECSC would create a [[common market]] for [[coal]] and [[steel]]. The leaders also signed a declaration that this day, 18 April 1951, marked the true foundation of an organized Europe. The ECSC was governed by a '[[High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community|High Authority]]', checked by bodies representing governments, MPs and an independent judiciary. |
||
The ECSC was joined by two other similar communities in 1957, with whom it shared its membership and some [[Institutions of the European Union|institutions]]. In 1969 all its institutions were merged with that of the [[European Economic Community]] (EEC, which later became part of the [[European Union]]), but it retained its own independent identity. However in 2002 the Treaty of Paris expired, and with no desire to renew the treaty, all the ECSC activities and resources were absorbed by the [[European Community]]. During its existence, the ECSC had succeeded in creating a common market but could not prevent the decline of the coal and steel industries. It did however set the ground for the future European Union. |
The ECSC was joined by two other similar communities in 1957, with whom it shared its membership and some [[Institutions of the European Union|institutions]]. In 1969 all its institutions were merged with that of the [[European Economic Community]] (EEC, which later became part of the [[European Union]]), but it retained its own independent identity. However in 2002 the Treaty of Paris expired, and with no desire to renew the treaty, all the ECSC activities and resources were absorbed by the [[European Community]]. During its existence, the ECSC had succeeded in creating a common market but could not prevent the decline of the coal and steel industries. It did however set the ground for the future European Union. |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
[[Image:Schuman Declaration.jpg|thumb|left|[[Robert Schuman]] delivering his speech on [[9 May]] [[1950]]]] |
[[Image:Schuman Declaration.jpg|thumb|left|[[Robert Schuman]] delivering his speech on [[9 May]] [[1950]]]] |
||
{{see|History of the European Communities (1945-1957)}} |
{{see|History of the European Communities (1945-1957)}} |
||
The [[Schuman Declaration]] of [[9 May]] [[1950]] (later |
As Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Schuman was instrumental in turning French policy away from Gaullist policy of permanent occupation or control of parts of German territory such as the Ruhr or the Saar. Despite stiff ultra-nationalist, Gaullist and Communist opposition, the Assembly voted a number of resolutions in favor of his new policy of integrating Germany into a Community. The International Authority of the Ruhr changed in consequence. His guiding principles were based on the equality of States (international democracy) not power politics of domination. The [[Schuman Declaration]] of [[9 May]] [[1950]] (later known as [[Europe Day]]) celebrates the day when, after two Cabinet meetings, the proposal became French government policy. France was thus the first government to agree to share and grow sovereignty in a supranational Community. That decision was based on a text, written and edited by Schuman's friend and colleague, the Foreign Ministry lawyer, Paul Reuter and with the assistance of [[Jean Monnet]] and Schuman's Directeur de Cabinet, Bernard Clappier. It laid out a plan for a European Community to pool the [[coal]] and [[steel]] of its members in a [[common market]]. Schuman proposed that "''Franco-German production of coal and steel as a whole be placed under a common High Authority, within the framework of an organisation open to the participation of the other countries of Europe.''" Such an act was intended to help economic growth and cement peace between France and Germany, who were historic enemies. Coal and steel were vital resources needed for a country to wage war, so pooling those resources between two such enemies was seen as more than symbolic. Schuman saw the decision of the French Government on his proposal as the first example of a democratic and supranational Community, a new development in world history. The plan was also seen by some, like Monnet, who crossed out Reuter's mention of 'supranational' in the draft and inserted 'federation' as a first step to a "[[United States of Europe|European federation]]".<ref name="ENA TEC">{{cite web|title=The European Communities|publisher=[[European NAvigator]]|url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=16399|accessdate=2007-12-16}}</ref><ref name="EC TE-ECSC"/> |
||
===Political pressures=== |
===Political pressures=== |
||
In [[West Germany]], the [[Social Democratic Party of Germany]], in spite of support from unions and other socialists in Europe, decided it would oppose the Schuman plan. [[Kurt Schumacher]]'s personal distrust of France, capitalism, and [[Konrad Adenauer]] aside, he claimed that a focus on integrating with a "Little Europe of the Six" would override the SPD's prime objective of German re-unification and thus empower ultra-nationalist and Communist movements in the West. He also thought the ECSC would end any hopes of nationalising the steel industry and lock in a Europe of "cartels, clerics and conservatives."<ref name=Orlow2002>{{cite book |
In [[West Germany]], Schuman kept the closest contacts with the new generation of democratic politicians. Karl Arnold, the Minister President of North Rhine-Westphalia, the province that included the coal and steel producing Ruhr, was initially spokesman for German foreign affairs. He gave a number of speeches and broadcasts on a supranational coal and steel community at the same time as Robert Schuman began to propose this Community in 1948 and 1949. The [[Social Democratic Party of Germany]], in spite of support from unions and other socialists in Europe, decided it would oppose the Schuman plan. [[Kurt Schumacher]]'s personal distrust of France, capitalism, and [[Konrad Adenauer]] aside, he claimed that a focus on integrating with a "Little Europe of the Six" would override the SPD's prime objective of German re-unification and thus empower ultra-nationalist and Communist movements in the West. He also thought the ECSC would end any hopes of nationalising the steel industry and lock in a Europe of "cartels, clerics and conservatives." Younger members of the party like Carlo Schmid, were, however, in favor of the Community and pointed to the long socialist support for the supranational idea.<ref name=Orlow2002>{{cite book |
||
|author = Orlow, D. |
|author = Orlow, D. |
||
|year = 2002 |
|year = 2002 |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
In France, [[Charles de Gaulle]] had been an early supporter of "linkages" between economies - on French terms - and had spoken of a "European confederation" that would exploit the resources of the [[Ruhr]] in 1945. However, he opposed the ECSC as a ''[[faux]]'' pooling ("''le pool, ce faux semblant''") because he considered it an unsatisfactory "piecemeal approach" to European unity, and because he considered the French government "too weak" to dominate the ECSC as he thought proper.<ref name=Chopra1974>{{cite book |
In France, Schuman had gained strong political and intellectual support from all sections of the nation and many non-Communist parties. Notable amongst these were ministerial colleague Andre Philip and Edouard Bonnefous, president of the Foreign Relations Committee, and former prime minister, [[Paul Reynaud]]. Projects for a coal and steel authority and other supranational communities were formulated in specialist subcommittees of the Council of Europe in the period before it became French government policy. [[Charles de Gaulle]], who was then out of power, had been an early supporter of "linkages" between economies - on French terms - and had spoken of a "European confederation" that would exploit the resources of the [[Ruhr]] in 1945. However, he opposed the ECSC as a ''[[faux]]'' pooling ("''le pool, ce faux semblant''") because he considered it an unsatisfactory "piecemeal approach" to European unity, and because he considered the French government "too weak" to dominate the ECSC as he thought proper.<ref name=Chopra1974>{{cite book |
||
|author = Chopra, H.S. |
|author = Chopra, H.S. |
||
|year = 1974 |
|year = 1974 |
||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
}}</ref> De Gaulle also felt that the ECSC had insufficient supra-national authority because the Assembly was not ratified by a European referendum, and he did not accept [[Raymond Aron]]'s contention that the ECSC was intended as a movement away from [[United States]] domination. Consequently, de Gaulle and his followers in the [[RPF]] voted against ratification in the [[National Assembly of France|lower house of the French Parliament]].<ref name=Chopra1974/> |
}}</ref> De Gaulle also felt that the ECSC had insufficient supra-national authority because the Assembly was not ratified by a European referendum, and he did not accept [[Raymond Aron]]'s contention that the ECSC was intended as a movement away from [[United States]] domination. Consequently, de Gaulle and his followers in the [[RPF]] voted against ratification in the [[National Assembly of France|lower house of the French Parliament]].<ref name=Chopra1974/> |
||
Despite these pressures, the ECSC was established. It gained strong majority votes in all eleven chambers of the parliaments of the Six, as well as support among associations and public opinion. In 1950 many had thought another war was inevitable. The steel and coal interests, however, were quite vocal in their opposition. The Council of Europe, created by a proposal of Schuman's first government in May 1948, helped articulate European public opinion and gave the Community idea positive support. |
|||
Despite these pressures, the ECSC was established. |
|||
===Treaties=== |
===Treaties=== |
||
The 100 article long [[Treaty of Paris (1951)|Treaty of Paris]] which established the ECSC was signed on [[18 April]] [[1951]] by France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, It made the ECSC the first international organisation to be based on [[supranational]] principles<ref name="ENA TEC"/> and was, through the establishment of a common market for coal and steel, intended to expand the economies, increase employment, and raise the standard of living within the Community. The market was also intended to progressively rationalise the distribution of high level production whilst ensuring stability and employment. The common market for coal was opened on [[10 February]] [[1953]], and for steel on [[1 May]] [[1953]].<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> Upon taking effect the ECSC gradually replaced the [[International Authority for the Ruhr]].<ref>[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/GerRecon/omg1952Jan/reference/history.omg1952jan.i0023.pdf Office of the US High Commissioner for Germany Office of Public Affairs, Public Relations Division, APO 757, US Army, January 1952] "Plans for terminating international authority for the Ruhr" , pp. 61-62</ref> |
The 100 article long [[Treaty of Paris (1951)|Treaty of Paris]] which established the ECSC was signed on [[18 April]] [[1951]] by France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, It made the ECSC the first international organisation to be based on [[supranational]] principles<ref name="ENA TEC"/> and was, through the establishment of a common market for coal and steel, intended to expand the economies, increase employment, and raise the standard of living within the Community. The market was also intended to progressively rationalise the distribution of high level production whilst ensuring stability and employment. The common market for coal was opened on [[10 February]] [[1953]], and for steel on [[1 May]] [[1953]].<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> Upon taking effect the ECSC gradually replaced the [[International Authority for the Ruhr]].<ref>[http://images.library.wisc.edu/History/EFacs/GerRecon/omg1952Jan/reference/history.omg1952jan.i0023.pdf Office of the US High Commissioner for Germany Office of Public Affairs, Public Relations Division, APO 757, US Army, January 1952] "Plans for terminating international authority for the Ruhr" , pp. 61-62</ref> |
||
Six years after the Treaty of Paris, the [[Treaties of Rome]] were signed by the six ECSC members, creating the [[European Economic Community]] (EEC) and the [[European Atomic Energy Community]] (EAEC or 'Euratom'). These Communities were based, with some adjustments, on the ECSC. The Treaties of Rome were to be in force indefinitely, unlike the Treaty of Paris which was to expire after fifty years. These two new Communities worked on the creation of a [[customs union]] and [[atomic energy]] |
Six years after the Treaty of Paris, the [[Treaties of Rome]] were signed by the six ECSC members, creating the [[European Economic Community]] (EEC) and the [[European Atomic Energy Community]] (EAEC or 'Euratom'). These Communities were based, with some adjustments, on the ECSC. The Treaties of Rome were to be in force indefinitely, unlike the Treaty of Paris which was to expire after fifty years. These two new Communities worked on the creation of a [[customs union]] and [[atomic energy and non-proliferation]] community respectively. The Rome treaties were hurried through just before de Gaulle seized power and proclaimed the Fifth Republic. Despite his efforts to 'chloroform' the Communities, their fields rapidly expanded and the EEC became the most important tool for political unification, overshadowing the ECSC.<ref name="ENA TEC"/> |
||
===Merger and expiry=== |
===Merger and expiry=== |
||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
==Institutions== |
==Institutions== |
||
{{see|Institutions of the European Union}} |
{{see|Institutions of the European Union}} |
||
The institutions of the ECSC were the ''High Authority'', the ''Common Assembly'', the ''Special Council of Ministers'' and the ''Court of Justice''. A |
The institutions of the ECSC were the ''High Authority'', the ''Common Assembly'', the ''Special Council of Ministers'' and the ''Court of Justice''. A ''Consultative Committee'' was established alongside the High Authority, as a key fifth institution representing civil society. These institutions were merged in 1967 with those of the European Community, which then governed the ECSC,<ref name="ENA TEEC">{{cite web|title=The Treaties establishing the European Communities|publisher=[[European NAvigator]]|url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=16393|accessdate=2007-12-16}}</ref> except for the Committee which continued to be independent until the expiration of the Treaty of Paris in 2002.<ref name="ENA CC"/> |
||
The Treaty stated that the [[Location of European Union institutions|location of the institutions]] would be decided by common accord of the members, yet the issue was hotly contested. As a temporary compromise, the institutions were provisionally located in the [[Luxembourg (city)|City of Luxembourg]], despite the Assembly being based in [[Strasbourg]].<ref name="ENA seats">{{cite web|first=|title=The seats of the institutions of the European Union|date=|url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=20822|publisher=[[European NAvigator]]|accessdate=2007-07-18}}</ref> |
The Treaty stated that the [[Location of European Union institutions|location of the institutions]] would be decided by common accord of the members, yet the issue was hotly contested. As a temporary compromise, the institutions were provisionally located in the [[Luxembourg (city)|City of Luxembourg]], despite the Assembly being based in [[Strasbourg]].<ref name="ENA seats">{{cite web|first=|title=The seats of the institutions of the European Union|date=|url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=20822|publisher=[[European NAvigator]]|accessdate=2007-07-18}}</ref> |
||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
[[Image:Luxembourg0080.JPG|thumb|Headquarters of the High Authority in Luxembourg]] |
[[Image:Luxembourg0080.JPG|thumb|Headquarters of the High Authority in Luxembourg]] |
||
{{main|High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community}} |
{{main|High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community}} |
||
The High Authority (the predecessor to the [[European Commission]]) was a nine-member executive body which governed the community. France, Germany and Italy |
The High Authority (the predecessor to the [[European Commission]]) was a nine-member executive body which governed the community. Nationality was not specified. Governments could chose only eight, forcing them to chose fair-minded people. France, Germany and Italy and other smaller States would have a maximum of two members each on the Authority. One Member was to be co-opted.The first in this position was Paul Finet, a Belgian metallurgist and trade unionist. Thus the Authority and the later Commission is not to be composed of national figures but rather experienced, independent Europeans known for honesty and judgement. Schuman suggested that half the Authority should be co-opted to assure the independence and impartiality of the Authority, but this was not taken up. The president was to be appointed by a procedure provided by the governments (article 11), specifying also the vice-presidents [[President of the European Commission|President of the High Authority]].<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> |
||
Despite being appointed by national governments, the members were |
Despite being appointed by agreement of national governments acting together, the members were to pledge not to represent their [[national interest]], but rather took a oath to defend the general interests of the Community as a whole. Their independence was aided by members being barred from having any occupation outside the Authority or having any business interests (paid or unpaid)and for three years after they left office.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> To further ensure impartiality, one third of the membership was to be renewed every two years, (article 10). |
||
The Authority's principle innovation was its supranational character. It had a broad area of competence to ensure the objectives of the treaty were met and that the common market functioned smoothly. The High Authority could issue three [[Law of the European Union#Institutional acts|types of legal instruments]]: [[Regulation (European Union)|Decisions]], which were entirely binding laws; [[Directive (European Union)|Recommendations]], which had binding aims but the methods were left to member states; and Opinions, which had no legal force.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> |
The Authority's principle innovation was its supranational character. It had a broad area of competence to ensure the objectives of the treaty were met and that the common market functioned smoothly. The High Authority could issue three [[Law of the European Union#Institutional acts|types of legal instruments]]: [[Regulation (European Union)|Decisions]], which were entirely binding laws; [[Directive (European Union)|Recommendations]], which had binding aims but the methods were left to member states; and Opinions, which had no legal force.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> |
||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
===Other institutions=== |
===Other institutions=== |
||
The Common Assembly (which later became the [[European Parliament]]) was composed of 78 representatives and exercised supervisory powers over the executive High Authority. The Common Assembly representatives were to be national MPs |
The Common Assembly (which later became the [[European Parliament]]) was composed of 78 representatives and exercised supervisory powers over the executive High Authority. The Common Assembly representatives were to be national MPs delegated each year by their Parliaments to the Assembly, or directly elected 'by universal suffrage' (article 21). Though in practice it was the former as there was no time requirement for elections. This requirement was repeated in the [[Treaties of Rome]] but despite democratic protestation throughout de Gaulle's presidency of France, no election was held[[European Parliament election, 1979|until 1979]]. However, to emphasise that the chamber was not a traditional international organisation composed of representatives of national governments, the Treaty of Paris used the term "''representatives of the peoples''".<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> The Assembly was not originally specified in the [[Schuman Proposal]] because it was hoped the Community would use the institutions (Assembly, Court) of the Council of Europe. When this became impossible because of British objections, separate institutions had to be created. The Assembly was intended as a democratic counter-weight and check to the High Authority, to advise but also to have power to sack the Authority for incompetence, injustice, corruption or fraud. The first [[President of the European Parliament|President]] (akin to a [[Speaker (politics)|Speaker]]) was [[Paul-Henri Spaak]].<ref name="ENA multi">{{cite web | title = Multilateral negotiations | publisher =[[European NAvigator]] | url =http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=326 | accessdate = 2008-02-24 }}</ref> |
||
The Special Council of Ministers (equivalent to the current [[Council of the European Union]]) was composed of representatives of national governments. The [[Presidency of the Council of the European Union|Presidency]] was held by each state for a period of three months, rotating between them in alphabetical order. One of its key aspects was the harmonisation of the work of the High Authority and that of national governments, which were still responsible for the state's general economic policies. The Council was also required to issue opinions on certain areas of work of the High Authority.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> Issues relating only to coal and steel were in the exclusive domain of the High Authority and in these areas the Council (unlike the modern Council) could only act as a scrutiny on the Authority. However, areas outside coal and steel required the consent of the Council.<ref name="ENA history">{{cite web|publisher = [[European NAvigator]]|title = Council of the European Union|url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=5604|accessdate = 2007-06-24}}</ref> |
The Special Council of Ministers (equivalent to the current [[Council of the European Union]]) was composed of representatives of national governments. The [[Presidency of the Council of the European Union|Presidency]] was held by each state for a period of three months, rotating between them in alphabetical order. One of its key aspects was the harmonisation of the work of the High Authority and that of national governments, which were still responsible for the state's general economic policies. The Council was also required to issue opinions on certain areas of work of the High Authority.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> Issues relating only to coal and steel were in the exclusive domain of the High Authority and in these areas the Council (unlike the modern Council) could only act as a scrutiny on the Authority. However, areas outside coal and steel required the consent of the Council.<ref name="ENA history">{{cite web|publisher = [[European NAvigator]]|title = Council of the European Union|url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=5604|accessdate = 2007-06-24}}</ref> |
||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
The Court of Justice was to ensure the observation of ECSC law along with the interpretation and application of the Treaty. The Court was composed of seven judges, appointed by common accord of the national governments for six years. There were no requirements that the judges had to be of a certain nationality, simply that they be qualified and that their independence be beyond doubt. The Court was assisted by two Advocates General.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> |
The Court of Justice was to ensure the observation of ECSC law along with the interpretation and application of the Treaty. The Court was composed of seven judges, appointed by common accord of the national governments for six years. There were no requirements that the judges had to be of a certain nationality, simply that they be qualified and that their independence be beyond doubt. The Court was assisted by two Advocates General.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> |
||
The Consultative Committee (similar to the [[Economic and Social Committee]]) had between 30 and 50 members equally divided between producers, workers, consumers and dealers in the coal and steel sector. Members were appointed for two years and were not bound by any mandate or instruction of the organisations which appointed them. The Committee had a plenary assembly, bureau and a president. The High Authority was obliged to consult the Committee in certain cases where it was appropriate and to keep it informed.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> The Consultative Committee remained independent (despite the merger of the other institutions) until 2002, when the Treaty expired and its duties were taken over by the Economic and Social Committee (ESC). Despite its independence, the Committee did cooperate with the ESC when they were consulted on the same issue.<ref name="ENA CC">{{cite web|publisher = [[European NAvigator]]|title = |
The Consultative Committee (similar to the [[Economic and Social Committee]]) had between 30 and 50 members equally divided between producers, workers, consumers and dealers in the coal and steel sector. Again, there was no national quotas and the treaty requires representatives of European associations to organise their own democratic procedures. They were to establish rules to make their membership fully and 'representative' of these aspects of democratic organised civil society. Members were appointed for two years and were not bound by any mandate or instruction of the organisations which appointed them. The Committee had a plenary assembly, bureau and a president. Again, the required democratic procedures were not introduced and nomination of these members remained in the hands of national ministers. The High Authority was obliged to consult the Committee in certain cases where it was appropriate and to keep it informed.<ref name="ENA TEEC"/> The Consultative Committee remained independent (despite the merger of the other institutions) until 2002, when the Treaty expired and its duties were taken over by the Economic and Social Committee (ESC). Despite its independence, the Committee did cooperate with the ESC when they were consulted on the same issue.<ref name="ENA CC">{{cite web|publisher = [[European NAvigator]]|title = |
||
European Economic and Social Committee and ECSC Consultative Committee |url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=8594|accessdate = 2007-06-24}}</ref> |
European Economic and Social Committee and ECSC Consultative Committee |url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=8594|accessdate = 2007-06-24}}</ref> |
||
==Achievements and failures== |
==Achievements and failures== |
||
The Community had little effect on coal and steel production, which respectively decreased and increased relative to the world trends. |
The Community had little effect on coal and steel production, which respectively decreased and increased relative to the world trends. Its mission (article 2)was more general: to 'contribute to the expansion of the economy, the development of employment and the improvement of the standard of living' of its citizens. Trade between members did increase (tenfold for coal) which saved members' money by not having to import resources from the United States, particularly where there were cutbacks in one state. The High Authority also issued 280 modernisation loans to the industry which helped the industry to improve output and reduce costs. Costs were further reduced by the abolition of tariffs at borders.<ref name="Mathieu">{{cite web|last=Mathieu|first=Gilbert|title=The history of the ECSC: good times and bad|publisher=[[Le Monde]], accessed on [[European NAvigator]]|date=[[1970-05-09]]|url=http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=16472|accessdate=2007-12-16}}</ref> |
||
Among the ECSC's greatest achievements are those on welfare issues. Some mines, for example were clearly unsustainable without government subsidies. Some miners had extremely poor housing. Over 15 years it financed 112,500 flats for workers, paying [[United States dollar|US$]]1,770 per flat, enabling workers to buy a home they could not have otherwise afforded. The ECSC also paid half the occupational redeployment costs of those workers who have lost their jobs as coal and steel facilities began to close down. Combined with regional redevelopment aid the ECSC spent $150 million creating 100,000 jobs, a third of which were for unemployed coal and steel workers. The welfare guarantees invented by the ECSC were extended to workers outside the coal and steel sector by some of its members.<ref name="Mathieu"/> |
|||
Far more important than creating Europe's first social and regional policy, the ECSC introduced European peace. It involved the continent's first European tax. This was a flat tax, a levy on production with a maximum rate of one percent. Given that the European Community countries are now experiencing the longest period of peace in more than two thousand years, this has been described as the cheapest tax for peace in history. Another world war, or 'world suicide' as Schuman called this threat in 1949, was avoided. In October 1953 Schuman said that the possibility of another European war had been eliminated. Reasoning had to prevail among member states. |
|||
| ⚫ | However the ECSC failed to achieve several fundamental aims of the Treaty of Paris. It was hoped the ECSC would prevent a resurgence of large coal and steel groups such as the ''Konzerne'', which helped [[Adolf Hitler]] rise to power. |
||
| ⚫ | However the ECSC failed to achieve several fundamental aims of the Treaty of Paris. It was hoped the ECSC would prevent a resurgence of large coal and steel groups such as the ''Konzerne'', which helped [[Adolf Hitler]] rise to power. In the Cold War trad-offs, the cartels and major companies re-emerged, leading to apparent [[price fixing]] (another element that was meant to be tackled). With a democratic supervisory system the worst aspects of past abuse were avoided with the anti-cartel powers of the Authority, the first international anti-cartel agency in the world. Efficient firms were allowed to expand into a European market without undue domination. Oil, gas, electricity became natural competitors to coal and also broke cartel powers. Furthermore, with the move to oil, the Community failed to define a proper energy policy. The Euratom treaty was largely stifled by de Gaulle and the European governments refused the suggestion of an Energy Community involving electricity and other vectors that was suggested at Messina in 1955. In a time of high inflation and monetary instability ECSC also fell short of ensuring an upward equalisation of pay of workers within the market. These failures could be put down to overambition in a short period of time, or that the goals were merely political posturing to be ignored. The greatest achievements of the European Coal and Steel Community lie in its revolutionary democratic concepts of a supranational Community. This is a potential that has yet to be fully explored and exploited. <ref name="Mathieu"/> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
| Line 215: | Line 217: | ||
* rtsp://rtsppress.cec.eu.int/Archive/video/mpeg/i000679/i000679.rm (insert address into [[RealPlayer]]) Common Destiny, a period film explaining the Coal and Steel Community, [[Europa (web portal)]] |
* rtsp://rtsppress.cec.eu.int/Archive/video/mpeg/i000679/i000679.rm (insert address into [[RealPlayer]]) Common Destiny, a period film explaining the Coal and Steel Community, [[Europa (web portal)]] |
||
* [http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=16303 Treaty constituting the European Coal and Steel Community], [[European NAvigator]] |
* [http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=16303 Treaty constituting the European Coal and Steel Community], [[European NAvigator]] |
||
* http://schuman.info |
|||
* |
*[http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=3618 The institutions of the European Coal and Steel Community], European NAvigator |
||
* [http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/saar.htm France, Germany and the Struggle for the War-making Natural Resources of the Rhineland], [[American University]] |
* [http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/saar.htm France, Germany and the Struggle for the War-making Natural Resources of the Rhineland], [[American University]] |
||
* [http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/marshall/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=1&documentdate=1947-03-24&documentid=37&studycollectionid=mp&nav=ok Ruhr Delegation of the United States of America, Council of Foreign Ministers American Embassy Moscow, March 24, 1947], [[Truman Library]] |
* [http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/marshall/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=1&documentdate=1947-03-24&documentid=37&studycollectionid=mp&nav=ok Ruhr Delegation of the United States of America, Council of Foreign Ministers American Embassy Moscow, March 24, 1947], [[Truman Library]] |
||
Revision as of 14:54, 18 June 2008
European Coal and Steel Community | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1951–2002 | |||||||||
 | |||||||||
 | |||||||||
| Status | International organisation | ||||||||
| Capital | Not applicable¹ | ||||||||
| Common languages | |||||||||
| President of the High Authority | |||||||||
• 1952-1955 | Jean Monnet | ||||||||
• 1955-1958 | René Mayer | ||||||||
• 1958-1959 | Paul Finet | ||||||||
• 1959-1963 | Piero Malvestiti | ||||||||
• 1963-1967 | Rinaldo Del Bo | ||||||||
| Historical era | Cold War | ||||||||
• Signing | 18 April 1951 | ||||||||
• In force | 23 July 1952 1951 | ||||||||
• Merger | 1 July 1967 | ||||||||
• Expired | 23 July 2002 2002 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
¹ The political centres were Luxembourg and Strasbourg, later also Brussels. ²Initial founding languages, before the merger and subsequent enlargements, were Dutch, English, French, German and Italian. | |||||||||
The European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was a six-nation international organisation serving to unify Western Europe during the Cold War and creating the foundation for European democracy and the modern-day developments of the European Union. The ECSC was the first organisation to be based on the principles of supranationalism. These principles were enunciated by Robert Schuman (French Prime Minister and Foreign Minister) at the foundation of the Council of Europe in May 1949, in speeches around Europe and at the United Nations in 1948 and 1949.
The ECSC was first proposed by French foreign minister Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950 as a way to prevent further war between France and Germany. He declared his aim was to 'make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible.' The means to do so, Europe's first supranational Community, was formally established in 1951 by the Treaty of Paris, signed not only by France and Germany, but also by Italy and the three Benelux states: Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Between these states the ECSC would create a common market for coal and steel. The leaders also signed a declaration that this day, 18 April 1951, marked the true foundation of an organized Europe. The ECSC was governed by a 'High Authority', checked by bodies representing governments, MPs and an independent judiciary.
The ECSC was joined by two other similar communities in 1957, with whom it shared its membership and some institutions. In 1969 all its institutions were merged with that of the European Economic Community (EEC, which later became part of the European Union), but it retained its own independent identity. However in 2002 the Treaty of Paris expired, and with no desire to renew the treaty, all the ECSC activities and resources were absorbed by the European Community. During its existence, the ECSC had succeeded in creating a common market but could not prevent the decline of the coal and steel industries. It did however set the ground for the future European Union.
History
As Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Schuman was instrumental in turning French policy away from Gaullist policy of permanent occupation or control of parts of German territory such as the Ruhr or the Saar. Despite stiff ultra-nationalist, Gaullist and Communist opposition, the Assembly voted a number of resolutions in favor of his new policy of integrating Germany into a Community. The International Authority of the Ruhr changed in consequence. His guiding principles were based on the equality of States (international democracy) not power politics of domination. The Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950 (later known as Europe Day) celebrates the day when, after two Cabinet meetings, the proposal became French government policy. France was thus the first government to agree to share and grow sovereignty in a supranational Community. That decision was based on a text, written and edited by Schuman's friend and colleague, the Foreign Ministry lawyer, Paul Reuter and with the assistance of Jean Monnet and Schuman's Directeur de Cabinet, Bernard Clappier. It laid out a plan for a European Community to pool the coal and steel of its members in a common market. Schuman proposed that "Franco-German production of coal and steel as a whole be placed under a common High Authority, within the framework of an organisation open to the participation of the other countries of Europe." Such an act was intended to help economic growth and cement peace between France and Germany, who were historic enemies. Coal and steel were vital resources needed for a country to wage war, so pooling those resources between two such enemies was seen as more than symbolic. Schuman saw the decision of the French Government on his proposal as the first example of a democratic and supranational Community, a new development in world history. The plan was also seen by some, like Monnet, who crossed out Reuter's mention of 'supranational' in the draft and inserted 'federation' as a first step to a "European federation".[1][2]
Political pressures
In West Germany, Schuman kept the closest contacts with the new generation of democratic politicians. Karl Arnold, the Minister President of North Rhine-Westphalia, the province that included the coal and steel producing Ruhr, was initially spokesman for German foreign affairs. He gave a number of speeches and broadcasts on a supranational coal and steel community at the same time as Robert Schuman began to propose this Community in 1948 and 1949. The Social Democratic Party of Germany, in spite of support from unions and other socialists in Europe, decided it would oppose the Schuman plan. Kurt Schumacher's personal distrust of France, capitalism, and Konrad Adenauer aside, he claimed that a focus on integrating with a "Little Europe of the Six" would override the SPD's prime objective of German re-unification and thus empower ultra-nationalist and Communist movements in the West. He also thought the ECSC would end any hopes of nationalising the steel industry and lock in a Europe of "cartels, clerics and conservatives." Younger members of the party like Carlo Schmid, were, however, in favor of the Community and pointed to the long socialist support for the supranational idea.[3]
In France, Schuman had gained strong political and intellectual support from all sections of the nation and many non-Communist parties. Notable amongst these were ministerial colleague Andre Philip and Edouard Bonnefous, president of the Foreign Relations Committee, and former prime minister, Paul Reynaud. Projects for a coal and steel authority and other supranational communities were formulated in specialist subcommittees of the Council of Europe in the period before it became French government policy. Charles de Gaulle, who was then out of power, had been an early supporter of "linkages" between economies - on French terms - and had spoken of a "European confederation" that would exploit the resources of the Ruhr in 1945. However, he opposed the ECSC as a faux pooling ("le pool, ce faux semblant") because he considered it an unsatisfactory "piecemeal approach" to European unity, and because he considered the French government "too weak" to dominate the ECSC as he thought proper.[4] De Gaulle also felt that the ECSC had insufficient supra-national authority because the Assembly was not ratified by a European referendum, and he did not accept Raymond Aron's contention that the ECSC was intended as a movement away from United States domination. Consequently, de Gaulle and his followers in the RPF voted against ratification in the lower house of the French Parliament.[4]
Despite these pressures, the ECSC was established. It gained strong majority votes in all eleven chambers of the parliaments of the Six, as well as support among associations and public opinion. In 1950 many had thought another war was inevitable. The steel and coal interests, however, were quite vocal in their opposition. The Council of Europe, created by a proposal of Schuman's first government in May 1948, helped articulate European public opinion and gave the Community idea positive support.
Treaties
The 100 article long Treaty of Paris which established the ECSC was signed on 18 April 1951 by France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, It made the ECSC the first international organisation to be based on supranational principles[1] and was, through the establishment of a common market for coal and steel, intended to expand the economies, increase employment, and raise the standard of living within the Community. The market was also intended to progressively rationalise the distribution of high level production whilst ensuring stability and employment. The common market for coal was opened on 10 February 1953, and for steel on 1 May 1953.[5] Upon taking effect the ECSC gradually replaced the International Authority for the Ruhr.[6]
Six years after the Treaty of Paris, the Treaties of Rome were signed by the six ECSC members, creating the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC or 'Euratom'). These Communities were based, with some adjustments, on the ECSC. The Treaties of Rome were to be in force indefinitely, unlike the Treaty of Paris which was to expire after fifty years. These two new Communities worked on the creation of a customs union and atomic energy and non-proliferation community respectively. The Rome treaties were hurried through just before de Gaulle seized power and proclaimed the Fifth Republic. Despite his efforts to 'chloroform' the Communities, their fields rapidly expanded and the EEC became the most important tool for political unification, overshadowing the ECSC.[1]
Merger and expiry
Despite being separate legal entities, the ECSC, EEC and Euratom initially shared the Common Assembly and the European Court of Justice, although the Councils and the High Authority/Commissions remained separate. To avoid duplication, the Merger Treaty merged these separate bodies of the ECSC and Euratom with the EEC. The EEC later became one of the three pillars of the present day European Union.[1]
The Treaty of Paris was frequently amended as the EC and EU evolved and expanded. With the treaty due to expire in 2002, debate began at the beginning of the 1990s on what to do with it. It was eventually decided that it should be left to expire. The areas covered by the ECSC's treaty were transferred to the Treaty of Rome and the financial loose ends and the ECSC research fund were dealt with via a protocol of the Treaty of Nice. The treaty finally expired on 23 July 2002.[2] That day, the ECSC flag was lowered for the final time outside the European Commission in Brussels and replaced with the EU flag.[7]
Timeline of treaties
Since the end of World War II, sovereign European countries have entered into treaties and thereby co-operated and harmonised policies (or pooled sovereignty) in an increasing number of areas, in the European integration project or the construction of Europe (French: la construction européenne). The following timeline outlines the legal inception of the European Union (EU)—the principal framework for this unification. The EU inherited many of its present responsibilities from the European Communities (EC), which were founded in the 1950s in the spirit of the Schuman Declaration.
| Legend: S: signing F: entry into force T: termination E: expiry de facto supersession Rel. w/ EC/EU framework: de facto inside outside |
 European Union (EU)
|
[Cont.] | ||||||||||||||||
| European Communities (EC)
|
(Pillar I) | |||||||||||||||||
| European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC or Euratom) | [Cont.] | |||||||||||||||||
 /  /  /  European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)
|
||||||||||||||||||
| European Economic Community (EEC) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Schengen Rules | European Community (EC) | |||||||||||||||||
| 'TREVI' | Justice and Home Affairs (JHA, pillar II) | |||||||||||||||||
 /  North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)
|
[Cont.] | Police and Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters (PJCC, pillar II) | ||||||||||||||||
  Anglo-French alliance |
[Defence arm handed to NATO] | European Political Co-operation (EPC) | Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP, pillar III) | |||||||||||||||
 Western Union (WU)
|
 /  Western European Union (WEU)
|
[Tasks defined following the WEU's 1984 reactivation handed to the EU] | ||||||||||||||||
| [Social, cultural tasks handed to CoE] | [Cont.] | |||||||||||||||||
| Council of Europe (CoE)
| ||||||||||||||||||
Entente Cordiale
S: 8 April 1904 |
Davignon report
S: 27 October 1970 |
European Council conclusions
S: 2 December 1975 |
||||||||||||||||
- ^ a b c d e Although not EU treaties per se, these treaties affected the development of the EU defence arm, a main part of the CFSP. The Franco-British alliance established by the Dunkirk Treaty was de facto superseded by WU. The CFSP pillar was bolstered by some of the security structures that had been established within the remit of the 1955 Modified Brussels Treaty (MBT). The Brussels Treaty was terminated in 2011, consequently dissolving the WEU, as the mutual defence clause that the Lisbon Treaty provided for EU was considered to render the WEU superfluous. The EU thus de facto superseded the WEU.
- ^ Plans to establish a European Political Community (EPC) were shelved following the French failure to ratify the Treaty establishing the European Defence Community (EDC). The EPC would have combined the ECSC and the EDC.
- ^ The European Communities obtained common institutions and a shared legal personality (i.e. ability to e.g. sign treaties in their own right).
- ^ The treaties of Maastricht and Rome form the EU's legal basis, and are also referred to as the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), respectively. They are amended by secondary treaties.
- ^ Between the EU's founding in 1993 and consolidation in 2009, the union consisted of three pillars, the first of which were the European Communities. The other two pillars consisted of additional areas of cooperation that had been added to the EU's remit.
- ^ The consolidation meant that the EU inherited the European Communities' legal personality and that the pillar system was abolished, resulting in the EU framework as such covering all policy areas. Executive/legislative power in each area was instead determined by a distribution of competencies between EU institutions and member states. This distribution, as well as treaty provisions for policy areas in which unanimity is required and qualified majority voting is possible, reflects the depth of EU integration as well as the EU's partly supranational and partly intergovernmental nature.
Institutions
The institutions of the ECSC were the High Authority, the Common Assembly, the Special Council of Ministers and the Court of Justice. A Consultative Committee was established alongside the High Authority, as a key fifth institution representing civil society. These institutions were merged in 1967 with those of the European Community, which then governed the ECSC,[5] except for the Committee which continued to be independent until the expiration of the Treaty of Paris in 2002.[8]
The Treaty stated that the location of the institutions would be decided by common accord of the members, yet the issue was hotly contested. As a temporary compromise, the institutions were provisionally located in the City of Luxembourg, despite the Assembly being based in Strasbourg.[9]
High Authority
The High Authority (the predecessor to the European Commission) was a nine-member executive body which governed the community. Nationality was not specified. Governments could chose only eight, forcing them to chose fair-minded people. France, Germany and Italy and other smaller States would have a maximum of two members each on the Authority. One Member was to be co-opted.The first in this position was Paul Finet, a Belgian metallurgist and trade unionist. Thus the Authority and the later Commission is not to be composed of national figures but rather experienced, independent Europeans known for honesty and judgement. Schuman suggested that half the Authority should be co-opted to assure the independence and impartiality of the Authority, but this was not taken up. The president was to be appointed by a procedure provided by the governments (article 11), specifying also the vice-presidents President of the High Authority.[5]
Despite being appointed by agreement of national governments acting together, the members were to pledge not to represent their national interest, but rather took a oath to defend the general interests of the Community as a whole. Their independence was aided by members being barred from having any occupation outside the Authority or having any business interests (paid or unpaid)and for three years after they left office.[5] To further ensure impartiality, one third of the membership was to be renewed every two years, (article 10).
The Authority's principle innovation was its supranational character. It had a broad area of competence to ensure the objectives of the treaty were met and that the common market functioned smoothly. The High Authority could issue three types of legal instruments: Decisions, which were entirely binding laws; Recommendations, which had binding aims but the methods were left to member states; and Opinions, which had no legal force.[5]
Up to the merger in 1967, the authority had five Presidents followed by an interim President serving for the final days.[10]
| President | State | Took office | Left office | Authority |
| Jean Monnet | France | 10 August 1952 | 3 June 1955 | Monnet Authority |
| René Mayer | France | 3 June 1955 | 13 January 1958 | Mayer Authority |
| Paul Finet | Belgium | 13 January 1958 | 15 September 1959 | Finet Authority |
| Piero Malvestiti | Italy | 15 September 1959 | 22 October 1963 | Malvestiti Authority |
| Rinaldo Del Bo | Italy | 22 October 1963 | 6 July 1967 | Del Bo Authority |
| Albert Coppé | Belgium | interim | Coppé Authority | |
Other institutions
The Common Assembly (which later became the European Parliament) was composed of 78 representatives and exercised supervisory powers over the executive High Authority. The Common Assembly representatives were to be national MPs delegated each year by their Parliaments to the Assembly, or directly elected 'by universal suffrage' (article 21). Though in practice it was the former as there was no time requirement for elections. This requirement was repeated in the Treaties of Rome but despite democratic protestation throughout de Gaulle's presidency of France, no election was helduntil 1979. However, to emphasise that the chamber was not a traditional international organisation composed of representatives of national governments, the Treaty of Paris used the term "representatives of the peoples".[5] The Assembly was not originally specified in the Schuman Proposal because it was hoped the Community would use the institutions (Assembly, Court) of the Council of Europe. When this became impossible because of British objections, separate institutions had to be created. The Assembly was intended as a democratic counter-weight and check to the High Authority, to advise but also to have power to sack the Authority for incompetence, injustice, corruption or fraud. The first President (akin to a Speaker) was Paul-Henri Spaak.[11]
The Special Council of Ministers (equivalent to the current Council of the European Union) was composed of representatives of national governments. The Presidency was held by each state for a period of three months, rotating between them in alphabetical order. One of its key aspects was the harmonisation of the work of the High Authority and that of national governments, which were still responsible for the state's general economic policies. The Council was also required to issue opinions on certain areas of work of the High Authority.[5] Issues relating only to coal and steel were in the exclusive domain of the High Authority and in these areas the Council (unlike the modern Council) could only act as a scrutiny on the Authority. However, areas outside coal and steel required the consent of the Council.[12]
The Court of Justice was to ensure the observation of ECSC law along with the interpretation and application of the Treaty. The Court was composed of seven judges, appointed by common accord of the national governments for six years. There were no requirements that the judges had to be of a certain nationality, simply that they be qualified and that their independence be beyond doubt. The Court was assisted by two Advocates General.[5]
The Consultative Committee (similar to the Economic and Social Committee) had between 30 and 50 members equally divided between producers, workers, consumers and dealers in the coal and steel sector. Again, there was no national quotas and the treaty requires representatives of European associations to organise their own democratic procedures. They were to establish rules to make their membership fully and 'representative' of these aspects of democratic organised civil society. Members were appointed for two years and were not bound by any mandate or instruction of the organisations which appointed them. The Committee had a plenary assembly, bureau and a president. Again, the required democratic procedures were not introduced and nomination of these members remained in the hands of national ministers. The High Authority was obliged to consult the Committee in certain cases where it was appropriate and to keep it informed.[5] The Consultative Committee remained independent (despite the merger of the other institutions) until 2002, when the Treaty expired and its duties were taken over by the Economic and Social Committee (ESC). Despite its independence, the Committee did cooperate with the ESC when they were consulted on the same issue.[8]
Achievements and failures
The Community had little effect on coal and steel production, which respectively decreased and increased relative to the world trends. Its mission (article 2)was more general: to 'contribute to the expansion of the economy, the development of employment and the improvement of the standard of living' of its citizens. Trade between members did increase (tenfold for coal) which saved members' money by not having to import resources from the United States, particularly where there were cutbacks in one state. The High Authority also issued 280 modernisation loans to the industry which helped the industry to improve output and reduce costs. Costs were further reduced by the abolition of tariffs at borders.[13]
Among the ECSC's greatest achievements are those on welfare issues. Some mines, for example were clearly unsustainable without government subsidies. Some miners had extremely poor housing. Over 15 years it financed 112,500 flats for workers, paying US$1,770 per flat, enabling workers to buy a home they could not have otherwise afforded. The ECSC also paid half the occupational redeployment costs of those workers who have lost their jobs as coal and steel facilities began to close down. Combined with regional redevelopment aid the ECSC spent $150 million creating 100,000 jobs, a third of which were for unemployed coal and steel workers. The welfare guarantees invented by the ECSC were extended to workers outside the coal and steel sector by some of its members.[13]
Far more important than creating Europe's first social and regional policy, the ECSC introduced European peace. It involved the continent's first European tax. This was a flat tax, a levy on production with a maximum rate of one percent. Given that the European Community countries are now experiencing the longest period of peace in more than two thousand years, this has been described as the cheapest tax for peace in history. Another world war, or 'world suicide' as Schuman called this threat in 1949, was avoided. In October 1953 Schuman said that the possibility of another European war had been eliminated. Reasoning had to prevail among member states.
However the ECSC failed to achieve several fundamental aims of the Treaty of Paris. It was hoped the ECSC would prevent a resurgence of large coal and steel groups such as the Konzerne, which helped Adolf Hitler rise to power. In the Cold War trad-offs, the cartels and major companies re-emerged, leading to apparent price fixing (another element that was meant to be tackled). With a democratic supervisory system the worst aspects of past abuse were avoided with the anti-cartel powers of the Authority, the first international anti-cartel agency in the world. Efficient firms were allowed to expand into a European market without undue domination. Oil, gas, electricity became natural competitors to coal and also broke cartel powers. Furthermore, with the move to oil, the Community failed to define a proper energy policy. The Euratom treaty was largely stifled by de Gaulle and the European governments refused the suggestion of an Energy Community involving electricity and other vectors that was suggested at Messina in 1955. In a time of high inflation and monetary instability ECSC also fell short of ensuring an upward equalisation of pay of workers within the market. These failures could be put down to overambition in a short period of time, or that the goals were merely political posturing to be ignored. The greatest achievements of the European Coal and Steel Community lie in its revolutionary democratic concepts of a supranational Community. This is a potential that has yet to be fully explored and exploited. [13]
See also
| History of the European Union |
|---|
 |
 European Union portal |
- Flag of the European Coal and Steel Community
- Schuman Declaration
- Energy policy of the European Union
- Energy Community
- The industrial plans for Germany
References
- ^ a b c d "The European Communities". European NAvigator. Retrieved 2007-12-16.
- ^ a b "Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, ECSC Treaty". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 2007-12-16.
- ^ Orlow, D. (2002). Common Destiny: A Comparative History of the Dutch, French, and German Social Democratic Parties, 1945-1969. Berghahn Books. p. 168-172.
- ^ a b Chopra, H.S. (1974). De Gaulle and European unity. Abhinav Publications. p. 28-33.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "The Treaties establishing the European Communities". European NAvigator. Retrieved 2007-12-16.
- ^ Office of the US High Commissioner for Germany Office of Public Affairs, Public Relations Division, APO 757, US Army, January 1952 "Plans for terminating international authority for the Ruhr" , pp. 61-62
- ^ "Ceremony to mark the expiry of the ECSC Treaty (Brussels, 23 July 2002)". European NAvigator. 2002-07-23. Retrieved 2007-12-16.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b "European Economic and Social Committee and ECSC Consultative Committee". European NAvigator. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ "The seats of the institutions of the European Union". European NAvigator. Retrieved 2007-07-18.
- ^ "Members of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)". European NAvigator. Retrieved 2007-12-16.
- ^ "Multilateral negotiations". European NAvigator. Retrieved 2008-02-24.
- ^ "Council of the European Union". European NAvigator. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ a b c Mathieu, Gilbert (1970-05-09). "The history of the ECSC: good times and bad". Le Monde, accessed on European NAvigator. Retrieved 2007-12-16.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)
Further reading
- Grin, Gilles (2003). The Battle of the Single European Market: Achievements and Economic Thought, 1945-2000. Kegan Paul. ISBN 978-0710309389.
- Hitchcock, William I. (1998). France Restored: Cold War Diplomacy and the Quest for Leadership in Europe, 1944-1954. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0-8078-4747-X.
- Maas, Willem (2007). Creating European Citizens. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5485-6.
External links
- rtsp://rtsppress.cec.eu.int/Archive/video/mpeg/i000679/i000679.rm (insert address into RealPlayer) Common Destiny, a period film explaining the Coal and Steel Community, Europa (web portal)
- Treaty constituting the European Coal and Steel Community, European NAvigator
- http://schuman.info
- The institutions of the European Coal and Steel Community, European NAvigator
- France, Germany and the Struggle for the War-making Natural Resources of the Rhineland, American University
- Ruhr Delegation of the United States of America, Council of Foreign Ministers American Embassy Moscow, March 24, 1947, Truman Library