Global Positioning System: Difference between revisions
Denelson83 (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 124.43.210.161 (talk) to last version by LouScheffer |
m →Using the C/A code: Changed 'they they' into 'they' |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
Conceptually, the receiver calculates an approximate distance to each satellite, called the [[pseudorange]]<ref>[http://gge.unb.ca/Resources/HowDoesGPSWork.html How Does GPS Work?]</ref>. This is equal to the estimated transit time (time the signal received - time it was sent), times the speed of light. It is called a pseudorange rather than a range since at this point it's just an educated guess - the receiver's clock might be wrong and the angles through the atmosphere are not yet known. |
Conceptually, the receiver calculates an approximate distance to each satellite, called the [[pseudorange]]<ref>[http://gge.unb.ca/Resources/HowDoesGPSWork.html How Does GPS Work?]</ref>. This is equal to the estimated transit time (time the signal received - time it was sent), times the speed of light. It is called a pseudorange rather than a range since at this point it's just an educated guess - the receiver's clock might be wrong and the angles through the atmosphere are not yet known. |
||
[[Image:GPS-pseudorange.svg|thumb|right|A 2-D example of the problem - determining a 2D position from three psuedoranges. The dark curves are the pseudoranges, which should overlap at a single point ''if'' the receiver clock is correct. Since they do not meet at a point, the clock must be off. The algorithm modifies all radii equally until |
[[Image:GPS-pseudorange.svg|thumb|right|A 2-D example of the problem - determining a 2D position from three psuedoranges. The dark curves are the pseudoranges, which should overlap at a single point ''if'' the receiver clock is correct. Since they do not meet at a point, the clock must be off. The algorithm modifies all radii equally until they are as close as possible to meeting in a single point (light curves). This is the estimated position. The change in the radii needed, divided by the speed of light, is the clock correction required.]] |
||
Next, the orbital position data, or [[ephemeris]], from the Navigation Message is then downloaded to calculate precisely where the satellite was at the start of the message. A more-sensitive receiver will potentially acquire the ephemeris data more quickly than a less-sensitive receiver, especially in a noisy environment.<ref name="ephemeris">{{cite web |url=http://www.navsync.com/notes2.html |title=AN02 Network Assistance |accessdate=2007-09-10 |format=HTML }}</ref> Knowing the position and the distance of a satellite indicates that the receiver is located somewhere on the surface of an imaginary sphere centered on that satellite and whose radius is the distance to it. Receivers can substitute altitude for one satellite, which the GPS receiver translates to a pseudorange measured from the center of the Earth. |
Next, the orbital position data, or [[ephemeris]], from the Navigation Message is then downloaded to calculate precisely where the satellite was at the start of the message. A more-sensitive receiver will potentially acquire the ephemeris data more quickly than a less-sensitive receiver, especially in a noisy environment.<ref name="ephemeris">{{cite web |url=http://www.navsync.com/notes2.html |title=AN02 Network Assistance |accessdate=2007-09-10 |format=HTML }}</ref> Knowing the position and the distance of a satellite indicates that the receiver is located somewhere on the surface of an imaginary sphere centered on that satellite and whose radius is the distance to it. Receivers can substitute altitude for one satellite, which the GPS receiver translates to a pseudorange measured from the center of the Earth. |
Revision as of 15:23, 7 July 2008
The Global Positioning System (GPS) is the only fully functional Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The GPS uses a constellation of at least 24 (32 by March 2008) Medium Earth Orbit satellites that transmit precise microwave signals, that enable GPS receivers to determine their location, speed, direction, and time. GPS was developed by the United States Department of Defense. Its official name is NAVSTAR-GPS. Although NAVSTAR-GPS is not an acronym[1], a few backronyms have been created for it[2]. The GPS satellite constellation is managed by the United States Air Force 50th Space Wing.
Similar satellite navigation systems include the Russian GLONASS (incomplete as of 2008), the upcoming European Galileo positioning system, the proposed COMPASS navigation system of China, and IRNSS of India.
Following the shooting down of Korean Air Lines Flight 007 in 1983, President Ronald Reagan issued a directive making the system available free for civilian use as a common good.[3] Since then, GPS has become a widely used aid to navigation worldwide, and a useful tool for map-making, land surveying, commerce, scientific uses, and hobbies such as geocaching. GPS also provides a precise time reference used in many applications including scientific study of earthquakes, and synchronization of telecommunications networks.
Method of operation
A GPS receiver calculates its position by carefully timing the signals sent by the constellation of GPS satellites high above the Earth. Each satellite continually transmits messages containing the time the message was sent, a precise orbit for the satellite sending the message (the ephemeris), and the general system health and rough orbits of all GPS satellites (the almanac). These signals travel at the speed of light through outer space, and slightly slower through the atmosphere. The receiver uses the arrival time of each message to measure the distance to each satellite, from which it determines the position of the receiver using geometry and trigonometry (see trilateration[4]) The resulting coordinates are converted to more user-friendly forms such as latitude and longitude, or location on a map, then displayed to the user.
It might seem that three satellites would be enough to solve for a position, since space has three dimensions. However, a three satellite solution requires the time be known to a nanosecond or so, far better than any non-laboratory clock can provide. Using four or more satellites allows the receiver to solve for time as well as geographical position, eliminating the need for a super accurate clock. In other words, the receiver uses four measurements to solve for four variables: x, y, z, and t. While many GPS applications have no particular use for the computed time, it is used in some GPS applications such as time transfer.
Although four satellites are required for normal operation, fewer may be needed in some special cases. If one variable is already known (for example, a sea-going ship knows its altitude is 0), a receiver can determine its position using only three satellites. Also, in practice, receivers use additional clues (doppler shift of satellite signals, last known position, dead reckoning, inertial navigation, and so on) to give degraded answers when fewer than four satellites are visible.
Technical description
System segmentation
The current GPS consists of three major segments. These are the space segment (SS), a control segment (CS), and a user segment (US).[5]
Space segment
The space segment (SS) comprises the orbiting GPS satellites, or Space Vehicles (SV) in GPS parlance. The GPS design originally called for 24 SVs, eight each in three circular orbital planes,[6] but this was modified to six planes with four satellites each.[7] The orbital planes are centered on the Earth, not rotating with respect to the distant stars.[8] The six planes have approximately 55° inclination (tilt relative to Earth's equator) and are separated by 60° right ascension of the ascending node (angle along the equator from a reference point to the orbit's intersection).[9] The orbits are arranged so that at least six satellites are always within line of sight from almost everywhere on Earth's surface.[10]
Orbiting at an altitude of approximately 20,200 kilometers (12,600 miles or 10,900 nautical miles; orbital radius of 26,600 km (16,500 mi or 14,400 NM)), each SV makes two complete orbits each sidereal day.[11] The ground track of each satellite therefore repeats each (sidereal) day. This was very helpful during development, since even with just four satellites, correct alignment means all four are visible from one spot for a few hours each day. For military operations, the ground track repeat can be used to ensure good coverage in combat zones.
As of September 2007, there are 31 actively broadcasting satellites in the GPS constellation. The additional satellites improve the precision of GPS receiver calculations by providing redundant measurements. With the increased number of satellites, the constellation was changed to a nonuniform arrangement. Such an arrangement was shown to improve reliability and availability of the system, relative to a uniform system, when multiple satellites fail.[12]
Control segment
The flight paths of the satellites are tracked by US Air Force monitoring stations in Hawaii, Kwajalein, Ascension Island, Diego Garcia, and Colorado Springs, Colorado, along with monitor stations operated by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA).[13] The tracking information is sent to the Air Force Space Command's master control station at Schriever Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, which is operated by the 2nd Space Operations Squadron (2 SOPS) of the United States Air Force (USAF). Then 2 SOPS contacts each GPS satellite regularly with a navigational update (using the ground antennas at Ascension Island, Diego Garcia, Kwajalein, and Colorado Springs). These updates synchronize the atomic clocks on board the satellites to within a few nanoseconds of each other, and adjust the ephemeris of each satellite's internal orbital model. The updates are created by a Kalman filter which uses inputs from the ground monitoring stations, space weather information, and various other inputs.[14]
Satellite maneuvers are not precise by GPS standards. So to change the orbit of a satellite, the satellite must be marked 'unhealthy', so receivers will not use it in their calculation. Then the maneuver can be carried out, and the resulting orbit tracked from the ground. Then the new ephemeris is uploaded and the satellite marked healthy again.
User segment
The user's GPS receiver is the user segment (US) of the GPS. In general, GPS receivers are composed of an antenna, tuned to the frequencies transmitted by the satellites, receiver-processors, and a highly-stable clock (often a crystal oscillator). They may also include a display for providing location and speed information to the user. A receiver is often described by its number of channels: this signifies how many satellites it can monitor simultaneously. Originally limited to four or five, this has progressively increased over the years so that, as of 2007, receivers typically have between 12 and 20 channels.[15]
GPS receivers may include an input for differential corrections, using the RTCM SC-104 format. This is typically in the form of a RS-232 port at 4,800 bit/s speed. Data is actually sent at a much lower rate, which limits the accuracy of the signal sent using RTCM. Receivers with internal DGPS receivers can outperform those using external RTCM data. As of 2006, even low-cost units commonly include Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) receivers.
Many GPS receivers can relay position data to a PC or other device using the NMEA 0183 protocol, or the newer and less widely used NMEA 2000.[16] Although these protocols are officially defined by the NMEA,[17] references to the these protocols have been compiled from public records, allowing open source tools like gpsd to read the protocol without violating intellectual property laws. Other proprietary protocols exist as well, such as the SiRF and MTK protocols. Receivers can interface with other devices using methods including a serial connection, USB or Bluetooth.
Navigation signals
Each GPS satellite continuously broadcasts a Navigation Message at 50 bit/s giving the time-of-week, GPS week number and satellite health information (all transmitted in the first part of the message), an ephemeris (transmitted in the second part of the message) and an almanac (later part of the message). The messages are sent in frames, each taking 30 seconds to transmit 1500 bits.
The first 6 seconds of every frame contains data describing the satellite clock and its relationship to GPS time. The next 12 seconds contain the ephemeris data, giving the satellite's own precise orbit. The ephemeris is updated every 2 hours and is generally valid for 4 hours, with provisions for updates every 6 hours or longer in non-nominal conditions. The time needed to acquire the ephemeris is becoming a significant element of the delay to first position fix, because, as the hardware becomes more capable, the time to lock onto the satellite signals shrinks, but the ephemeris data requires 30 seconds (worst case) before it is received, due to the low data transmission rate.
The almanac consists of coarse orbit and status information for each satellite in the constellation, an ionospheric model, and information to relate GPS derived time to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). A new part of the almanac is received for the last 12 seconds in each 30 second frame. Each frame contains 1/25th of the almanac, so 12.5 minutes are required to receive the entire almanac from a single satellite[18]. The almanac serves several purposes. The first is to assist in the acquisition of satellites at power-up by allowing the receiver to generate a list of visible satellites based on stored position and time, while an ephemeris from each satellite is needed to compute position fixes using that satellite. In older hardware, lack of an almanac in a new receiver would cause long delays before providing a valid position, because the search for each satellite was a slow process. Advances in hardware have made the acquisition process much faster, so not having an almanac is no longer an issue. The second purpose is for relating time derived from the GPS (called GPS time) to the international time standard of UTC. Finally, the almanac allows a single frequency receiver to correct for ionospheric error by using a global ionospheric model. The corrections are not as accurate as augmentation systems like WAAS or dual frequency receivers. However it is often better than no correction since ionospheric error is the largest error source for a single frequency GPS receiver. An important thing to note about navigation data is that each satellite transmits only its own ephemeris, but transmits an almanac for all satellites.
Each satellite transmits its navigation message with at least two distinct spread spectrum codes: the Coarse / Acquisition (C/A) code, which is freely available to the public, and the Precise (P) code, which is usually encrypted and reserved for military applications. The C/A code is a 1,023 chip pseudo-random (PRN) code at 1.023 million chips per second so that it repeats every millisecond.[19] Each satellite has its own C/A code so that it can be uniquely identified and received separately from the other satellites transmitting on the same frequency. The P-code is a 10.23 megachip per second PRN code that repeats only every week. When the "anti-spoofing" mode is on, as it is in normal operation, the P code is encrypted by the Y-code to produce the P(Y) code, which can only be decrypted by units with a valid decryption key. Both the C/A and P(Y) codes impart the precise time-of-day to the user.
GPS Frequencies
- L1 (1575.42 MHz): Mix of Navigation Message, coarse-acquisition (C/A) code and encrypted precision P(Y) code, plus the new L1C on future Block III satellites.
- L2 (1227.60 MHz): P(Y) code, plus the new L2C code on the Block IIR-M and newer satellites.
- L3 (1381.05 MHz): Used by the Nuclear Detonation (NUDET) Detection System Payload (NDS) to signal detection of nuclear detonations and other high-energy infrared events. Used to enforce nuclear test ban treaties.
- L4 (1379.913 MHz): Being studied for additional ionospheric correction.
- L5 (1176.45 MHz): Proposed for use as a civilian safety-of-life (SoL) signal (see GPS modernization). This frequency falls into an internationally protected range for aeronautical navigation, promising little or no interference under all circumstances. The first Block IIF satellite that would provide this signal is set to be launched in 2009[20].
Calculating positions
Using the C/A code
To start off, the receiver picks which C/A codes to listen for by PRN number, based on the almanac information it has previously acquired. As it detects each satellite's signal, it identifies it by its distinct C/A code pattern, then measures the received time for each satellite. To do this, the receiver produces an identical C/A sequence using the same seed number, referenced to its local clock, starting at the same time the satellite sent it. It then computes the offset to the local clock that generates the maximum correlation. This offset is the time delay from the satellite to the receiver, as told by the receiver's clock. Since the PRN repeats every millisecond, this offset is precise but ambiguous, and the ambiguity is resolved by looking at the data bits, which are sent at 50 Hz (20 ms/bit) and aligned with the PRN code.
This data is used to solve for the x, y and z coordinates of position and time t. Many mathematical techniques can be used. The following description shows a straightforward iterative way, but receivers use more sophisticated methods (see below).
Conceptually, the receiver calculates an approximate distance to each satellite, called the pseudorange[21]. This is equal to the estimated transit time (time the signal received - time it was sent), times the speed of light. It is called a pseudorange rather than a range since at this point it's just an educated guess - the receiver's clock might be wrong and the angles through the atmosphere are not yet known.
Next, the orbital position data, or ephemeris, from the Navigation Message is then downloaded to calculate precisely where the satellite was at the start of the message. A more-sensitive receiver will potentially acquire the ephemeris data more quickly than a less-sensitive receiver, especially in a noisy environment.[22] Knowing the position and the distance of a satellite indicates that the receiver is located somewhere on the surface of an imaginary sphere centered on that satellite and whose radius is the distance to it. Receivers can substitute altitude for one satellite, which the GPS receiver translates to a pseudorange measured from the center of the Earth.
When pseudoranges are determined for four or more satellites, an estimate of the GPS receiver position can be made. If the receiver's time is correct, all spheres defined by the pseudo-ranges will meet (or nearly so) at a single point. If they do not, the receiver expands or contracts the spheres (all by the same amount) until they are as close as possible to meeting at a point. The change in radius needed, divided by the speed of light, is the clock correction required. The receiver then adjusts its local clock and tries again, iterating until the correction is sufficiently small. Note that this process requires that all satellite signals used in the computation be measured simultaneously - otherwise the clock correction for each one would be different, due to local clock drift. Then each sphere would require a different correction, and there would be no unique solution.
With each combination of four or more satellites, a geometric dilution of precision (GDOP) vector can be calculated, based on the relative sky positions of the satellites used.[23] As more satellites are picked up, pseudoranges from more combinations satellites can be processed to add more estimates to the location and clock offset. The receiver then determines which combinations to use and how to calculate the estimated position by determining the weighted average of these positions and clock offsets. After the final location and time are calculated, the location is expressed in a specific coordinate system such as latitude and longitude, using the WGS 84 geodetic datum or a local system specific to a country.
There are many other alternatives and improvements to this process. If at least four satellites are visible, for example, the receiver can eliminate time from the equations by computing only time differences, then solving for position as the intersection of hyperboloids.[24] The spheres have a very large radius and are locally very flat, so linear algebra and iteration can be substituted for the more complex spherical geometry.[25] With a full constellation and modern receivers, more than four satellites can be seen and received at once. Then all satellite data can be weighted by GDOP, signal to noise, path length through the ionosphere, and other accuracy concerns, and then used in a least squares fit to find a solution. In this case the residuals also give an estimate of the errors. Finally, results from other positioning systems such as GLONASS or the upcoming Galileo can be used in the fit, or used to double check the result. (By design, these systems use the same bands, so much of the receiver circuitry can be shared, though the decoding is different.)
Using the P(Y) code
Calculating a position with the P(Y) signal is generally similar in concept, assuming one can decrypt it. The encryption is essentially a safety mechanism: if a signal can be successfully decrypted, it is reasonable to assume it is a real signal being sent by a GPS satellite.[citation needed] In comparison, civil receivers are highly vulnerable to spoofing since correctly formatted C/A signals can be generated using readily available signal generators. RAIM features do not protect against spoofing, since RAIM only checks the signals from a navigational perspective.
Accuracy and error sources
Source | Effect |
---|---|
Ionospheric effects | ± 5 m |
Ephemeris errors | ± 2.5 m |
Satellite clock errors | ± 2 m |
Multipath distortion | ± 1 m |
Tropospheric effects | ± 0.5 m |
Numerical errors | ± 1 m |
The position calculated by a GPS receiver requires the current time, the position of the satellite and the measured delay of the received signal. The position accuracy is primarily dependent on the satellite position and signal delay.
To measure the delay, the receiver compares the bit sequence received from the satellite with an internally generated version. By comparing the rising and trailing edges of the bit transitions, modern electronics can measure signal offset to within about 1% of a bit time, or approximately 10 nanoseconds for the C/A code. Since GPS signals propagate at the speed of light, this represents an error of about 3 meters.
Position accuracy can be improved by using the higher-chiprate P(Y) signal. Assuming the same 1% bit time accuracy, the high frequency P(Y) signal results in an accuracy of about 30 centimeters.
Electronics errors are one of several accuracy-degrading effects outlined in the table below. When taken together, autonomous civilian GPS horizontal position fixes are typically accurate to about 15 meters (50 ft). These effects also reduce the more precise P(Y) code's accuracy.
Atmospheric effects
Inconsistencies of atmospheric conditions affect the speed of the GPS signals as they pass through the Earth's atmosphere, especially the ionosphere. Correcting these errors is a significant challenge to improving GPS position accuracy. These effects are smallest when the satellite is directly overhead and become greater for satellites nearer the horizon since the path through the atmosphere is longer (see airmass). Once the receiver's approximate location is known, a mathematical model can be used to estimate and compensate for these errors.
Because ionospheric delay affects the speed of microwave signals differently depending on their frequency — a characteristic known as dispersion - delays measured on two more frequency bands can be used to measure dispersion, and this measurement can then be used to estimate the delay at each frequency[26]. Some military and expensive survey-grade civilian receivers measure the different delays in the L1 and L2 frequencies to measure atmospheric dispersion, and apply a more precise correction. This can be done in civilian receivers without decrypting the P(Y) signal carried on L2, by tracking the carrier wave instead of the modulated code. To facilitate this on lower cost receivers, a new civilian code signal on L2, called L2C, was added to the Block IIR-M satellites, which was first launched in 2005. It allows a direct comparison of the L1 and L2 signals using the coded signal instead of the carrier wave.
The effects of the ionosphere generally change slowly, and can be averaged over time. The effects for any particular geographical area can be easily calculated by comparing the GPS-measured position to a known surveyed location. This correction is also valid for other receivers in the same general location. Several systems send this information over radio or other links to allow L1-only receivers to make ionospheric corrections. The ionospheric data are transmitted via satellite in Satellite Based Augmentation Systems such as WAAS, which transmits it on the GPS frequency using a special pseudo-random noise sequence (PRN), so only one receiver and antenna are required.
Humidity also causes a variable delay, resulting in errors similar to ionospheric delay, but occurring in the troposphere. This effect both is more localized and changes more quickly than ionospheric effects, and is not frequency dependent. These traits make precise measurement and compensation of humidity errors more difficult than ionospheric effects.
Changes in receiver altitude also change the amount of delay, due to the signal passing through less of the atmosphere at higher elevations. Since the GPS receiver computes its approximate altitude, this error is relatively simple to correct, either by applying a function regression or correlating margin of atmospheric error to ambient pressure using a barometric altimeter.
Multipath effects
GPS signals can also be affected by multipath issues, where the radio signals reflect off surrounding terrain; buildings, canyon walls, hard ground, etc. These delayed signals can cause inaccuracy. A variety of techniques, most notably narrow correlator spacing, have been developed to mitigate multipath errors. For long delay multipath, the receiver itself can recognize the wayward signal and discard it. To address shorter delay multipath from the signal reflecting off the ground, specialized antennas (e.g. a choke ring antenna) may be used to reduce the signal power as received by the antenna. Short delay reflections are harder to filter out because they interfere with the true signal, causing effects almost indistinguishable from routine fluctuations in atmospheric delay.
Multipath effects are much less severe in moving vehicles. When the GPS antenna is moving, the false solutions using reflected signals quickly fail to converge and only the direct signals result in stable solutions.
Ephemeris and clock errors
While the ephemeris data is transmitted every 30 seconds, the information itself may be up to two hours old. Data up to four hours old is considered valid for calculating positions, but may not indicate the satellites actual position. If a fast TTFF is needed, it is possible to upload valid ephemeris to a receiver, and in addition to setting the time, a position fix can be obtained in under ten seconds. It is feasible to put such ephemeris data on the web so it can be loaded into mobile GPS devices.[27] See also Assisted GPS.
The satellite's atomic clocks experience noise and clock drift errors. The navigation message contains corrections for these errors and estimates of the accuracy of the atomic clock. However, they are based on observations and may not indicate the clock's current state.
These problems tend to be very small, but may add up to a few meters (10s of feet) of inaccuracy.[28]
Selective availability
GPS includes a (currently disabled) feature called Selective Availability (SA) that can introduce intentional, slowly changing random errors of up to a hundred meters (328 ft) into the publicly available navigation signals to confound, for example, the guidance of long range missiles to precise targets. When enabled, the accuracy is still available in the signal, but in an encrypted form that is only available to the United States military, its allies and a few others, mostly government users. Even those who have managed to acquire military GPS receivers would still need to obtain the daily key, whose dissemination is tightly controlled.
Prior to being turned off, SA typically added signal errors of up to about 10 meters (32 ft) horizontally and 30 meters (98 ft) vertically. The inaccuracy of the civilian signal was deliberately encoded so as not to change very quickly. For instance, the entire eastern U.S. area might read 30 m off, but 30 m off everywhere and in the same direction. To improve the usefulness of GPS for civilian navigation, Differential GPS was used by many civilian GPS receivers to greatly improve accuracy.
During the Gulf War, the shortage of military GPS units and the ready availability of civilian ones caused many troops to buy their own civilian GPS units: their wide use among personnel resulted in a decision to disable Selective Availability. This was ironic, as SA had been introduced specifically for these situations, allowing friendly troops to use the signal for accurate navigation, while at the same time denying it to the enemy—but the assumption underlying this policy was that all U.S. troops and enemy troops would have military-specification GPS receivers and that civilian receivers would not exist in war zones. But since many American soldiers were using civilian devices, SA was also denying the same accuracy to thousands of friendly troops; turning it off (by removing the added-in error) presented a clear benefit to friendly troops.
In the 1990s, the FAA started pressuring the military to turn off SA permanently. This would save the FAA millions of dollars every year in maintenance of their own radio navigation systems. The amount of error added was "set to zero"[29] at midnight on May 12000 following an announcement by U.S. President Bill Clinton, allowing users access to the error-free L1 signal. Per the directive, the induced error of SA was changed to add no error to the public signals (C/A code). Clinton's executive order required SA to be set to zero by 2006; it happened in 2000 once the US military developed a new system that provides the ability to deny GPS (and other navigation services) to hostile forces in a specific area of crisis without affecting the rest of the world or its own military systems.[29]
Selective Availability is still a system capability of GPS, and error could, in theory, be reintroduced at any time. In practice, in view of the hazards and costs this would induce for US and foreign shipping, it is unlikely to be reintroduced, and various government agencies, including the FAA,[30] have stated that it is not intended to be reintroduced.
One interesting side effect of the Selective Availability hardware is the capability to correct the frequency of the GPS cesium and rubidium atomic clocks to an accuracy of approximately 2 × 10-13 (one in five trillion). This represented a significant improvement over the raw accuracy of the clocks.[citation needed]
On 19 September 2007, the United States Department of Defense announced that future GPS III satellites will not be capable of implementing SA,[31] eventually making the policy permanent.[32]
Relativity
According to the theory of relativity, due to their constant movement and height relative to the Earth-centered inertial reference frame, the clocks on the satellites are affected by their speed (special relativity) as well as their gravitational potential (general relativity). For the GPS satellites, general relativity predicts that the atomic clocks at GPS orbital altitudes will tick more rapidly, by about 45.9 microseconds (μs) per day, because they are in a weaker gravitational field than atomic clocks on Earth's surface. Special relativity predicts that atomic clocks moving at GPS orbital speeds will tick more slowly than stationary ground clocks by about 7.2 μs per day. When combined, the discrepancy is about 38 microseconds per day; a difference of 4.465 parts in 1010.[33]. To account for this, the frequency standard onboard each satellite is given a rate offset prior to launch, making it run slightly slower than the desired frequency on Earth; specifically, at 10.22999999543 MHz instead of 10.23 MHz.[34] Since the atomic clocks on board the GPS satellites are precisely tuned, it makes the system a practical engineering application of the scientific theory of relativity in a real-world environment.
Sagnac distortion
GPS observation processing must also compensate for the Sagnac effect. The GPS time scale is defined in an inertial system but observations are processed in an Earth-centered, Earth-fixed (co-rotating) system, a system in which simultaneity is not uniquely defined. A Lorentz transformation is thus applied to convert from the inertial system to the ECEF system. The resulting signal run time correction has opposite algebraic signs for satellites in the Eastern and Western celestial hemispheres. Ignoring this effect will produce an east-west error on the order of hundreds of nanoseconds, or tens of meters in position.[35]
GPS interference and jamming
Natural sources
Since GPS signals at terrestrial receivers tend to be relatively weak, it is easy for other sources of electromagnetic radiation to desensitize the receiver, making acquiring and tracking the satellite signals difficult or impossible.
Solar flares are one such naturally occurring emission with the potential to degrade GPS reception, and their impact can affect reception over the half of the Earth facing the sun. GPS signals can also be interfered with by naturally occurring geomagnetic storms, predominantly found near the poles of the Earth's magnetic field.[36] GPS signals are also subjected to interference from Van Allen Belt radiation when the satellites pass through the South Atlantic Anomaly.
Artificial sources
Metallic features in windshields[37], such as defrosters, or car window tinting films[38] can act as a Faraday cage, degrading reception just inside the car.
Man-made EMI can also disrupt, or jam, GPS signals. In one well documented case, an entire harbor was unable to receive GPS signals due to unintentional jamming caused by a malfunctioning TV antenna preamplifier.[39] Intentional jamming is also possible. Generally, stronger signals can interfere with GPS receivers when they are within radio range, or line of sight. In 2002, a detailed description of how to build a short range GPS L1 C/A jammer was published in the online magazine Phrack.[40]
The U.S. government believes that such jammers were used occasionally during the 2001 war in Afghanistan and the U.S. military claimed to destroy six GPS jammers during the Iraq War , including one that was destroyed ironically with a GPS-guided bomb.[41] Such a jammer is relatively easy to detect and locate, making it an attractive target for anti-radiation missiles. The UK Ministry of Defence tested a jamming system in the UK's West Country on 7 and 8 June 2007. [42]
Some countries allow the use of GPS repeaters to allow for the reception of GPS signals indoors and in obscured locations, however, under EU and UK laws, the use of these is prohibited as the signals can cause interference to other GPS receivers that may receive data from both GPS satellites and the repeater.
Due to the potential for both natural and man-made noise, numerous techniques continue to be developed to deal with the interference. The first is to not rely on GPS as a sole source. According to John Ruley, "IFR pilots should have a fallback plan in case of a GPS malfunction".[43] Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) is a feature now included in some receivers, which is designed to provide a warning to the user if jamming or another problem is detected. The U.S. military has also deployed their Selective Availability / Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM) in the Defense Advanced GPS Receiver (DAGR). In demonstration videos, the DAGR is able to detect jamming and maintain its lock on the encrypted GPS signals during interference which causes civilian receivers to lose lock.[44]
Techniques to improve accuracy
Augmentation
Augmentation methods of improving accuracy rely on external information being integrated into the calculation process. There are many such systems in place and they are generally named or described based on how the GPS sensor receives the information. Some systems transmit additional information about sources of error (such as clock drift, ephemeris, or ionospheric delay), others provide direct measurements of how much the signal was off in the past, while a third group provide additional navigational or vehicle information to be integrated in the calculation process.
Examples of augmentation systems include the Wide Area Augmentation System, Differential GPS, Inertial Navigation Systems and Assisted GPS.
Precise monitoring
The accuracy of a calculation can also be improved through precise monitoring and measuring of the existing GPS signals in additional or alternate ways.
After SA, which has been turned off, the largest error in GPS is usually the unpredictable delay through the ionosphere. The spacecraft broadcast ionospheric model parameters, but errors remain. This is one reason the GPS spacecraft transmit on at least two frequencies, L1 and L2. Ionospheric delay is a well-defined function of frequency and the total electron content (TEC) along the path, so measuring the arrival time difference between the frequencies determines TEC and thus the precise ionospheric delay at each frequency.
Receivers with decryption keys can decode the P(Y)-code transmitted on both L1 and L2. However, these keys are reserved for the military and "authorized" agencies and are not available to the public. Without keys, it is still possible to use a codeless technique to compare the P(Y) codes on L1 and L2 to gain much of the same error information. However, this technique is slow, so it is currently limited to specialized surveying equipment. In the future, additional civilian codes are expected to be transmitted on the L2 and L5 frequencies (see GPS modernization, below). Then all users will be able to perform dual-frequency measurements and directly compute ionospheric delay errors.
A second form of precise monitoring is called Carrier-Phase Enhancement (CPGPS). The error, which this corrects, arises because the pulse transition of the PRN is not instantaneous, and thus the correlation (satellite-receiver sequence matching) operation is imperfect. The CPGPS approach utilizes the L1 carrier wave, which has a period 1000 times smaller than that of the C/A bit period, to act as an additional clock signal and resolve the uncertainty. The phase difference error in the normal GPS amounts to between 2 and 3 meters (6 to 10 ft) of ambiguity. CPGPS working to within 1% of perfect transition reduces this error to 3 centimeters (1 inch) of ambiguity. By eliminating this source of error, CPGPS coupled with DGPS normally realizes between 20 and 30 centimeters (8 to 12 inches) of absolute accuracy.
Relative Kinematic Positioning (RKP) is another approach for a precise GPS-based positioning system. In this approach, determination of range signal can be resolved to a precision of less than 10 centimeters (4 in). This is done by resolving the number of cycles in which the signal is transmitted and received by the receiver. This can be accomplished by using a combination of differential GPS (DGPS) correction data, transmitting GPS signal phase information and ambiguity resolution techniques via statistical tests—possibly with processing in real-time (real-time kinematic positioning, RTK).
GPS time and date
While most clocks are synchronized to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the atomic clocks on the satellites are set to GPS time. The difference is that GPS time is not corrected to match the rotation of the Earth, so it does not contain leap seconds or other corrections which are periodically added to UTC. GPS time was set to match Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) in 1980, but has since diverged. The lack of corrections means that GPS time remains at a constant offset (19 seconds) with International Atomic Time (TAI). Periodic corrections are performed on the on-board clocks to correct relativistic effects and keep them synchronized with ground clocks.[citation needed]
The GPS navigation message includes the difference between GPS time and UTC, which as of 2006 is 14 seconds due to the leap second added to UTC December 31st of 2005. Receivers subtract this offset from GPS time to calculate UTC and specific timezone values. New GPS units may not show the correct UTC time until after receiving the UTC offset message. The GPS-UTC offset field can accommodate 255 leap seconds (eight bits) which, at the current rate of change of the Earth's rotation, is sufficient to last until the year 2330.[citation needed]
As opposed to the year, month, and day format of the Gregorian calendar, the GPS date is expressed as a week number and a day-of-week number. The week number is transmitted as a ten-bit field in the C/A and P(Y) navigation messages, and so it becomes zero again every 1,024 weeks (19.6 years). GPS week zero started at 00:00:00 UTC (00:00:19 TAI) on January 6 1980 and the week number became zero again for the first time at 23:59:47 UTC on August 21 1999 (00:00:19 TAI on August 22, 1999). To determine the current Gregorian date, a GPS receiver must be provided with the approximate date (to within 3,584 days) to correctly translate the GPS date signal. To address this concern the modernized GPS navigation messages use a 13-bit field, which only repeats every 8,192 weeks (157 years), and will not return to zero until near the year 2137.[citation needed]
GPS modernization
This article needs to be updated. |
Having reached the program's requirements for Full Operational Capability (FOC) on July 17, 1995,[45] the GPS completed its original design goals. However, additional advances in technology and new demands on the existing system led to the effort to modernize the GPS. Announcements from the U.S. Vice President and the White House in 1998 initiated these changes, and in 2000 the U.S. Congress authorized the effort, referring to it as GPS III.
The project aims to improve the accuracy and availability for all users and involves new ground stations, new satellites, and four additional navigation signals. New civilian signals are called L2C, L5 and L1C; the new military code is called M-Code. Initial Operational Capability (IOC) of the L2C code is expected in 2008.[46] A goal of 2013 has been established for the entire program, with incentives offered to the contractors if they can complete it by 2011 (See GPS signals).
Applications
The Global Positioning System, while originally a military project, is considered a dual-use technology, meaning it has significant applications for both the military and the civilian industry.
Military
The military applications of GPS span many purposes:
- Navigation: GPS allows soldiers to find objectives in the dark or in unfamiliar territory, and to coordinate the movement of troops and supplies. The GPS-receivers commanders and soldiers use are respectively called the Commanders Digital Assistant and the Soldier Digital Assistant.[47][48][49][50]
- Target tracking: Various military weapons systems use GPS to track potential ground and air targets before they are flagged as hostile.[citation needed] These weapon systems pass GPS co-ordinates of targets to precision-guided munitions to allow them to engage the targets accurately. Military aircraft, particularly those used in air-to-ground roles use GPS to find targets (for example, gun camera video from AH-1 Cobras in Iraq show GPS co-ordinates that can be looked up in Google Earth[citation needed]).
- Missile and projectile guidance: GPS allows accurate targeting of various military weapons including ICBMs, cruise missiles and precision-guided munitions. Artillery projectiles with embedded GPS receivers able to withstand accelerations of 12,000G have been developed for use in 155 mm howitzers.[51]
- Search and Rescue: Downed pilots can be located faster if they have a GPS receiver.
- Reconnaissance and Map Creation: The military use GPS extensively to aid mapping and reconnaissance.
- The GPS satellites also carry a set of nuclear detonation detectors consisting of an optical sensor (Y-sensor), an X-ray sensor, a dosimeter, and an Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP) sensor (W-sensor) which form a major portion of the United States Nuclear Detonation Detection System.[52][53]
Civilian
Many civilian applications benefit from GPS signals, using one or more of three basic components of the GPS: absolute location, relative movement, and time transfer.
The ability to determine the receiver's absolute location allows GPS receivers to perform as a surveying tool or as an aid to navigation. The capacity to determine relative movement enables a receiver to calculate local velocity and orientation, useful in vessels or observations of the Earth. Being able to synchronize clocks to exacting standards enables time transfer, which is critical in large communication and observation systems. An example is CDMA digital cellular. Each base station has a GPS timing receiver to synchronize its spreading codes with other base stations to facilitate inter-cell hand off and support hybrid GPS/CDMA positioning of mobiles for emergency calls and other applications. Finally, GPS enables researchers to explore the Earth environment including the atmosphere, ionosphere and gravity field. GPS survey equipment has revolutionized tectonics by directly measuring the motion of faults in earthquakes.
To help prevent civilian GPS guidance from being used in an enemy's military or improvised weaponry, the US Government controls the export of civilian receivers. A US-based manufacturer cannot generally export a GPS receiver unless the receiver contains limits restricting it from functioning when it is simultaneously (1) at an altitude above 18 kilometers (60,000 ft) and (2) traveling at over 515 m/s (1,000 knots).[54] These parameters are well above the operating characteristics of the typical cruise missile, but would be characteristic of the reentry vehicle from a ballistic missile.
GPS functionality has now started to move into mobile phones en masse. The first handsets with integrated GPS were launched already in the late 1990’s, and were available for broader consumer availability on networks such as those run by Nextel, Sprint and Verizon in 2002 in response to US FCC mandates for handset positioning in emergency calls. Capabilities for access by third party software developers to these features were slower in coming, with Nextel opening those APIs up upon launch to any developer, Sprint following in 2006, and Verizon soon thereafter.
History
The design of GPS is based partly on the similar ground-based radio navigation systems, such as LORAN and the Decca Navigator developed in the early 1940s, and used during World War II. Additional inspiration for the GPS came when the Soviet Union launched the first Sputnik in 1957. A team of U.S. scientists led by Dr. Richard B. Kershner were monitoring Sputnik's radio transmissions. They discovered that, because of the Doppler effect, the frequency of the signal being transmitted by Sputnik was higher as the satellite approached, and lower as it continued away from them. They realized that since they knew their exact location on the globe, they could pinpoint where the satellite was along its orbit by measuring the Doppler distortion.
The first satellite navigation system, Transit, used by the United States Navy, was first successfully tested in 1960. Using a constellation of five satellites, it could provide a navigational fix approximately once per hour. In 1967, the U.S. Navy developed the Timation satellite which proved the ability to place accurate clocks in space, a technology the GPS relies upon. In the 1970s, the ground-based Omega Navigation System, based on signal phase comparison, became the first world-wide radio navigation system.
The first experimental Block-I GPS satellite was launched in February 1978.[46] The GPS satellites were initially manufactured by Rockwell International (now part of Boeing) and are now manufactured by Lockheed Martin (IIR/IIR-M) and Boeing (IIF).
Timeline
- In 1972, the US Air Force Central Inertial Guidance Test Facility (Holloman AFB) conducted developmental flight tests of two prototype GPS receivers over White Sands Missile Range, using ground-based pseudo-satellites.
- In 1978 the first experimental Block-I GPS satellite was launched.
- In 1983, after Soviet interceptor aircraft shot down the civilian airliner KAL 007 that strayed into restricted Soviet airspace due to navigational errors, killing all 269 people on board, U.S. President Ronald Reagan announced that the GPS would be made available for civilian uses once it was completed.[55][56]
- By 1985, ten more experimental Block-I satellites had been launched to validate the concept.
- On February 14, 1989, the first modern Block-II satellite was launched.
- In 1992, the 2nd Space Wing, which originally managed the system, was de-activated and replaced by the 50th Space Wing.
- By December 1993 the GPS achieved initial operational capability.[57]
- By January 17, 1994 a complete constellation of 24 satellites was in orbit.
- Full Operational Capability was declared by NAVSTAR in April 1995.
- In 1996, recognizing the importance of GPS to civilian users as well as military users, U.S. President Bill Clinton issued a policy directive[58] declaring GPS to be a dual-use system and establishing an Interagency GPS Executive Board to manage it as a national asset.
- In 1998, U.S. Vice President Al Gore announced plans to upgrade GPS with two new civilian signals for enhanced user accuracy and reliability, particularly with respect to aviation safety.
- On May 2, 2000 "Selective Availability" was discontinued as a result of the 1996 executive order, allowing users to receive a non-degraded signal globally.
- In 2004, the United States Government signed a historic agreement with the European Community establishing cooperation related to GPS and Europe's planned Galileo system.
- In 2004, U.S. President George W. Bush updated the national policy, replacing the executive board with the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Executive Committee.
- November 2004, QUALCOMM announced successful tests of Assisted-GPS for mobile phones.[59]
- In 2005, the first modernized GPS satellite was launched and began transmitting a second civilian signal (L2C) for enhanced user performance.
- On September 14 2007, the aging mainframe-based Ground Segment Control System was transitioned to the new Architecture Evolution Plan.[60]
- The most recent launch was on March 15, 2008.[61] The oldest GPS satellite still in operation was launched on July 4 1991, and became operational on August 30 1991.[62]
Block | Launch Period | Satellites launched | Currently in service |
---|---|---|---|
I | 1978–1985 | 10+11 | 0 |
II | 1985–1990 | 9 | 0 |
IIA | 1990–1997 | 19 | 13 |
IIR | 1997–2004 | 12+11 | 12 |
IIR-M | 2005–2008 | 6+22 | 6 |
IIF | 2009– | 0+102 | 0 |
Total | 58+21+122 | 31 | |
1Failed 2In preparation. (Last update: 12 April 2008) |
Awards
Two GPS developers received the National Academy of Engineering Charles Stark Draper Prize for 2003:
- Ivan Getting, emeritus president of The Aerospace Corporation and engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, established the basis for GPS, improving on the World War II land-based radio system called LORAN (Long-range Radio Aid to Navigation).
- Bradford Parkinson, professor of aeronautics and astronautics at Stanford University, conceived the present satellite-based system in the early 1960s and developed it in conjunction with the U.S. Air Force.
One GPS developer, Roger L. Easton, received the National Medal of Technology on February 13 2006 at the White House.[65]
On February 10, 1993, the National Aeronautic Association selected the Global Positioning System Team as winners of the 1992 Robert J. Collier Trophy, the most prestigious aviation award in the United States. This team consists of researchers from the Naval Research Laboratory, the U.S. Air Force, the Aerospace Corporation, Rockwell International Corporation, and IBM Federal Systems Company. The citation accompanying the presentation of the trophy honors the GPS Team "for the most significant development for safe and efficient navigation and surveillance of air and spacecraft since the introduction of radio navigation 50 years ago."
Other systems
Other satellite navigation systems in use or various states of development include:
- Beidou – China's regional system that China has proposed to expand into a global system named COMPASS.
- Galileo – a proposed global system being developed by the European Union, joined by China, Israel, India, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and Ukraine, planned to be operational by 2011–12.
- GLONASS – Russia's global system which is being restored to full availability in partnership with India.
- Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS) – India's proposed regional system.
- QZSS – Japanese proposed regional system, adding better coverage to the Japanese Islands.
See also
- Assisted GPS
- The American Practical Navigator - Chapter 11 Satellite Navigation
- Degree Confluence Project Use GPS to visit integral degrees of latitude and longitude.
- Exif, GPS data transfer.
- Geotagging
- Geocaching
- GPS Drawing Digital mapping and drawing with GPS tracks.
- GPS tracking
- GSM localization
- GPS/INS*GPX (XML schema for interchange of waypoints)
- High Sensitivity GPS
- GPS Phone
- ID Sniper rifle
- OpenStreetMap, free content maps and street pictures (GFDL)
- Point of Interest
- Radio navigation
- RAIM
- SIGI
- Telematics: Many telematics devices use GPS to determine the location of mobile equipment.
- Automotive navigation system
- Height Modernization
- NextGen
- Trilateration
- Skyhook Wireless — Wi-Fi Positioning System
References
- ^ Steven R. Strom. "Charting a Course Toward Global Navigation". The Aerospace Corporation. Retrieved 2008-06-27.
- ^ http://www.abbreviations.com/NAVSTAR
- ^ "History of GPS". usinfo.state.gov. February 3, 2006.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ HowStuffWorks: How GPS Receivers WorkAccessed May 14, 2006.
- ^ globalsecurity.org [1].
- ^ P. Daly. "Navstar GPS and GLONASS: global satellite navigation systems" (PDF). IEEE.
- ^ Dana, Peter H. GPS Orbital Planes. August 8, 1996.
- ^ What the Global Positioning System Tells Us about Relativity. Accessed January 2, 2007.
- ^ GPS Overview from the NAVSTAR Joint Program Office. Accessed December 15, 2006.
- ^ USCG Navcen: GPS Frequently Asked Questions. Accessed January 3, 2007.
- ^ Agnew, D.C. and Larson, K.M. (2007). "Finding the repeat times of the GPS constellation". GPS Solutions. 11 (1). Springer: 71--76. doi:10.1007/s10291-006-0038-4.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) This article from author's web site, with minor correction. - ^ Massatt, Paul and Brady, Wayne. "Optimizing performance through constellation management", Crosslink, Summer 2002, pages 17-21.
- ^ The additional stations are: Washington, DC, England, Argentina, Ecuador, Bahrain and Australia. Source: US Coast Guard General GPS News 9-9-05
- ^ USNO NAVSTAR Global Positioning System. Accessed May 14, 2006.
- ^ Note that though there are many receiver manufacurers, they almost all use one of the chipsets produced for this purpose. An example: "GPS Receiver Chip Performance Survey". GPS Technology Reviews.
- ^ NMEA NMEA 2000
- ^ "Publications and Standards from the National Marine Electronics Association (NMEA)". National Marine Electronics Association. Retrieved 2008-06-27.
- ^ "Interface Specification IS-GPS-200, Revision D: Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces" (PDF). Navstar GPS Joint Program Office. Page 103.
- ^ NPS GPS Support Facility - Glossary of Common GPS Terms, National Park Service, s.v. C/A code, retrieved 2008-06-27.
- ^ First GPS IIF Satellite Undergoes Environmental Testing. GPS World. November 5, 2007.
- ^ How Does GPS Work?
- ^ "AN02 Network Assistance" (HTML). Retrieved 2007-09-10.
- ^ Yang Yong and Miao Lingjuan (2004-07-06). "GDOP results in all-in-view positioning and in four optimum satellites positioning with GPS PRN codes ranging". Position Location and Navigation Symposium, 2004. PLANS 2004. pp. 723–727.
{{cite conference}}
: Unknown parameter|booktitle=
ignored (|book-title=
suggested) (help) - ^ Template:Cite article
- ^ Noe, P.S.; Myers, K.A. (March 1976). "A Position Fixing Algorithm for the Low-Cost GPS Receiver". IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. AES-12 (2): 295–297.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ The same principle, and the math behind it, can be found in descriptions of pulsar timing by astronomers.
- ^ http://www.tdc.co.uk/index.php?key=ephemeris Ephemeris Server Example
- ^ "UNit 1 - Introduction to GPS".
- ^ a b "Statement by the President regarding the United States' Decision to Stop Degrading Global Positioning System Accuracy". Office of Science and Technology Policy. May 1, 2000. Retrieved 2007-12-17.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "GNSS - Frequently Asked Questions - GPS: Will SA ever be turned back on?". FAA. June 13, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-17.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "DoD Permanently Discontinues Procurement Of Global Positioning System Selective Availability". DefenseLink. September 18, 2007. Retrieved 2008-02-20.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Selective Availability". National space-based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Executive Committee. Retrieved 2008-02-20.
- ^ Rizos, Chris. University of New South Wales. GPS Satellite Signals. 1999.
- ^ The Global Positioning System by Robert A. Nelson Via Satellite, November 1999
- ^ Ashby, Neil Relativity and GPS. Physics Today, May 2002.
- ^ Space Environment Center. SEC Navigation Systems GPS Page. August 26, 1996.
- ^ "I-PASS Mounting for Vehicles with Special Windshield Features" (PDF).
- ^ "3M Automotive Films".. Note that the 'Color Stable' films are specifically described as not interfering with satellite signals.
- ^ The hunt for an unintentional GPS jammer. GPS World. January 1, 2003.
- ^ Low Cost and Portable GPS Jammer. Phrack issue 0x3c (60), article 13]. Published December 28, 2002.
- ^ American Forces Press Service. Centcom charts progress. March 25, 2003.
- ^ MoD's tests will send satnav haywire so take a road atlas | the Daily Mail
- ^ Ruley, John. AVweb. GPS jamming. February 12, 2003.
- ^ Commercial GPS Receivers: Facts for the Warfighter. Hosted at the Joint Chiefs website, linked by the USAF's GPS Wing DAGR program website. Accessed on 10 April, 2007
- ^ US Coast Guard news release. Global Positioning System Fully Operational
- ^ a b Hydrographic Society Journal. Developments in Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Issue #104, April 2002. Accessed April 5, 2007.
- ^ http://peosoldier.army.mil/factsheets/SWAR_LW_DBCS.pdf Commanders Digital Assistant explanation and photo
- ^ Latest version Commanders Digital Assistant
- ^ http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/computers/lago/lago6.html Soldier Digital Assistant explanation and photo
- ^ http://www.gcn.com/print/22_20/22893-1.html Commanders and Soldiers' GPS-receivers
- ^ "XM982 Excalibur Precision Guided Extended Range Artillery Projectile". GlobalSecurity.org. 2007-05-29. Retrieved 2007-09-26.
- ^ Sandia National Laboratory's Nonproliferation programs and arms control technology.
- ^ Dr. Dennis D. McCrady. "The GPS Burst Detector W-Sensor" (PDF). Sandia National Laboratories.
- ^ Arms Control Association.Missile Technology Control Regime. Accessed May 17, 2006.
- ^ Dietrich Schroeer, Mirco Elena (2000). Technology Transfer. Ashgate. pp. p80. ISBN 075462045X. Retrieved 2008-05-25.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Michael Russell Rip, James M. Hasik (2002). The Precision Revolution: GPS and the Future of Aerial Warfare. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1557509735. Retrieved 2008-05-25.
- ^ United States Department of Defense. Announcement of Initial Operational Capability. December 8, 1993.
- ^ National Archives and Records Administration. U.S. Global Positioning System Policy. March 29, 1996.
- ^ 3g.co.uk
- ^ losangeles.af.mil
- ^ sidt.gpsworld.com
- ^ United States Naval Observatory. GPS Constellation Status. Accessed on October 17 2007.
- ^ "United States Naval Observatory ((USNO) - Block II Satellite Information".
- ^ GPS constellation status. Russian Space Agency. April 9 2008
- ^ United States Naval Research Laboratory. National Medal of Technology for GPS. November 21, 2005
External links
Government links
- GPS.gov — General public education website created by the U.S. Government
- National Space-Based PNT Executive Committee—Established in 2004 to oversee management of GPS and GPS augmentations at a national level.
- USCG Navigation Center—Status of the GPS constellation, government policy, and links to other references. Also includes satellite almanac data.
- Air Force Space Command GPS Operations Center homepage
- The GPS Program Office (GPS Wing)—Responsible for designing and acquiring the system on behalf of the US Government.
- U.S. Naval Observatory's GPS constellation status
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers manual: NAVSTAR HTML and PDF (22.6 MB, 328 pages)
- PNT Selective Availability Announcements
- Global Positioning System Systems Engineering Case Study (A detailed history of GPS development)
- Federal Aviation Administration's GPS FAQ
Introductory / tutorial links
- How GPS Works at HowStuffWorks
- GPS Academy Garmin interactive video web site explaing what exactly GPS is and what it can do for you.
- GPS Basics / u-blox GPS basics tutorial
- GPS and GLONASS Simulation(Java applet) Simulation and graphical depiction of space vehicle motion including computation of dilution of precision (DOP)
- How does GPS work? TomTom explains GPS, navigation, and digital maps
- How does eGPS work? CSR's online tutorial introduces the concept and principles of enhanced GPS techniques to improve A-GPS performance and provide indoor positioning
- HowStuffWorks Simplified explanation of GPS and video about how GPS works.
- Trimble's Online GPS Tutorial Tutorial designed to introduce you to the principles behind GPS
Technical, historical, and ancillary topics links
- GPS SPS Performance Standard — The official Standard Positioning Service specification.
- GPS PPS Performance Standard — The official Precise Positioning Service specification.
- Dana, Peter H. "Global Positioning System Overview"
- Satellite Navigation: GPS & Galileo (PDF)—16-page paper about the history and working of GPS, touching on the upcoming Galileo
- History of GPS, including information about each satellite's configuration and launch.
- Chadha, Kanwar. "The Global Positioning System: Challenges in Bringing GPS to Mainstream Consumers" Technical Article (1998)
- GPS Weapon Guidance Techniques
- RAND history of the GPS (PDF)
- GPS-guided educational experience based on the history of a location
- GPS Anti-Jam Protection Techniques
- Crosslink Summer 2002 issue by The Aerospace Corporation on satellite navigation.
- Improved weather predictions from COSMIC GPS satellite signal occultation data.
- David L. Wilson's GPS Accuracy Web Page A thorough analysis of the accuracy of GPS.
- Innovation: Spacecraft Navigator, Autonomous GPS Positioning at High Earth Orbits Example of GPS receiver designed for high altitude spaceflight.
- The Navigator GPS Receiver GSFC's Navigator spaceflight receiver.
- Neil Ashby's Relativity in the Global Positioning System
- Ralph Bucher's Hyperbolic Positioning Algorithm [2]
- Average Latitude & Longitude of Countries