:Hahahahah Thank you much! :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]] • [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]] 05:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
:Hahahahah Thank you much! :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]] • [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]] 05:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
== Edit warring warning ==
See my comments at AN3 and [[User talk:Mkativerata#Block of User:Chelo61]]. Your behavior in this dispute was definitely not appropriate; trying to win a content dispute by playing chicken with the 3RR line and then getting rid of your opponent is not the right way to do things. If you want to contest the wording in the article, you need to start a discussion at the talk page and invite Chelo and other editors to weigh in. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b> ([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 06:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
If you leave a message here, I will respond on your talk page.
Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]A cup of tea for you!
Mopsmanship is over-rated. There are so many tools around nowadays that anyone can do most of the janitorial work. But yeah, that hiring process is tough. Worse than a union initiation. Let me know if I can ever help you out with a officially approved mop. Will Bebacktalk10:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Haha okay. I'm just not sure what "Well, wait at most one day and I'll see you edit warrig about it, let see if the first IP still being it." means. Typo or missing word in incoherent run-on sentence, perhaps? To clarify, I mean it was the first IP edit after the expired semi-protection. Yves (talk) 01:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Request
Re: [User_talk:Raul654#Battle_of_Lissa_.281811.29 this discussion] - in the future, when tagging articles scheduled for the main page, could you use a more descriptive edit summary -- something like "This article is schedule to appear as the main page featured article in the near future" (or something like that)? (Also, thank you for doing it - it's a thankless task). Raul654 (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up - I like the notice. We requested the TFA via TFA/R, so it is not a surprise, and we have already added ALT text and done some minor cleanup, but I like the idea of the notice. Ruhrfisch><>°°19:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I made one of the maps in that article and knew of the scheduling incident. By the way, I noticed a typo in the header of the notice, it should be "is scheduled": The article Leonard Harrison State Park is schedule[d] to appear as the main page featured article in the near future. Thanks again, Ruhrfisch><>°°19:42, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, you reverted my addition of a cat here, on the grounds it was a redlink, fair do's but a least give us a minute to create the category! Oh well no harm done, the category is up and running and populated. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey. I am Richard Peterson. This photo is from a film I shot, Ironic Odyssey. It IS not a screen background. Please see the movie it is taken from at this link on Jeff Ragsdale's youtube page:
http://www.youtube.com/jeffreyragsdale#p/u/4/v58Kt8Re1wA
Actually the edit was rolled back for block evasion, which I would consider vandalisim. Check all the facts before you accuse me of misuse, on an uneraseable edit summary. CTJF83chat19:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well your hidden note shows you understand WP:BLP so not sure why you are questioning my revert anyway...clearly saying any of those pictured men have sex with men is a violation of BLP. CTJF83chat20:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Hey we have been working on a proyect about a famous engineer called Bernardo Quintana. I was wondering if you could take a look at it and ell me what do you think we should change. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidReque (talk • contribs) 04:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Cool
Those are misleading comments, I don't like to edit war, I just stand up for what I believe. What's wrong with italicising online source names? For instance, most Lady Gaga articles—if not all—who have GA status do it. I may as well take it to the talk page some other time. SnapSnap15:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for participating last time :)
Hi Tbhotch thanks for participating in the failed nomination for Number 1's. The article didn't pass, even though you supported and there were no opposes. Supposedly there weren't enough "Support" to promote, even though there was no "Oppose". There just simply aren't enough people that visit the nomination page :(. So I nominated another article until I cann re-nominate the old one. This time I'll just invite people to come and review lol. So can you rview Daydream (Mariah Carey album)? Your quick and very helpful. Thanks anyway, here is the review page. Thanks anyway! :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me00:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! I really apprecaite all your support! I just wish everyone on Wiki was as helpful as you, unfortunately, they oonly hinder Wiki's development. Thanks allot!! --CallMeNathan • Talk2Me08:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Tbhotch. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of European Club (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: All three band members are notable; band is presumed to be important. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk04:27, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Removing succession box
I don't really understand why you remove the succession box. I reviewed discussions about the removal of it but clearly a consensus has not reached yet. This editor had been warned of removing the boxes before a clear consensus is reached. Also the link you directed (WT:Charts) is not valid and the page does not exist. --Yong (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia question on template you recently unlocked
Hi, a template you recently unlocked, Template:World_Heritage_Sites_in_Israel, the dispute has not been resolved. After countless attempts to generate discussion on the talk page, the undoing party refuses to contribute though vital facts are being presented. Help me out please. :-\ asad (talk) 01:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted my edit on Lady Gaga's "The Fame" album page where I updated the album's certification in France to 5x Platinum. The article I cited indicated that "The Fame" has been certified diamond in France. The diamond certification threshold in France is 5x Platinum. I will update this certification again.
I will leave it as diamond certification then, though saying 5x Platinum would be just as accurate as citing a diamond certified album in the U.S. as 10x Platinum. The article is talking about sales including the re-release of "The Fame" which contained the 8 additional tracks from "The Fame Monster" EP. "The Fame Monster" was not released as a standalone album in France as it was in the U.S.
My bad, and my apologies. I actually removed that material orginally , and was reverted by someone who's stalking and reverting me. I accidentally reverterd your correction of the reversion of my deletion: A sentence that only makes sense on Wikipedia! Thanks, and sorry. John2510 (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You have a new message at Lionelt's talk page.
Looie496
Looie496 recently declined your request for protection of the Men who have sex with men page. [1] It is fairly clear from Looie's comment that he doesn't know what he is talking about. If you would like to discuss this man's behaviour further, please drop a note on my talk page. BadBabysitter (talk) 00:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know I was a little surprised about the decline, but I didn't want to discuss it. for now seems like the edit wars have decreased, so re-re-ask protection would not work. If you want to debate about the topic you can join us at the MSM talkpage. TbhotchTalkC.01:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The move by the previous editor was not warranted or done properly. But I copy/pasted it b/c the revert option at its log page was not there. I think there is a guideline that supports this if such an option is not available. Will u atleast help me move it back to "Slant Magazine" properly? Dan56 (talk) 03:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, if you see where someone obviously intended to create a sandbox, but accidentally did so in mainspace, instead of asking for speedy deletion, you can move the article to the editor's own space. I refer to User:Enwich Kazondu/sandbox/ which I moved to the editor's space after you put a speedy deletion tag on it. LadyofShalott20:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Any chance someone could remove the serial comma added to the article's TFA blurb, on 5 November? Its here - "Sir Everard Digby, and Francis Tresham". Parrotof Doom16:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did mean an indef full protection until both sides work out their issues. Outside input on the issue is welcome. Move protection reinstated. Mjroots (talk) 05:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I'm just wondering why "regionally important" counts as WP:Weasel - the city was the most important regional centre in the southeastern Petén during the Terminal Classic. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Umm
Hi, firstly, how does Daydream violate FAIR? Its licensed and has rational. In FA, one editors didn't think it was totally necessary, but its not violating anything. I don't mean this in a rude way, but your being a bit hypocritical, I mean you have the same thing in "Better in Time". Next, I appreciate your care, but its not that in the slightest. It has nothing to do with biased, or group weight in a discussion. Besides the fact that they are not obligated to pass the article if they choose to agree, not at all. I have done it fairly and successfully before.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me04:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well then you read it the wrong way, because did not imply anything unfair, even specified it after. Secondly, I agree about the ABMB photo, but the OSD photo serves as much purpose as the one with Leona, so we would have to remove that one as well. I don't know what you meant at the end of your post BTW. Also I am in no way in 3RR. In order to violate I must revert the same editor 4 times in a 24 hour basis. i reverted you 1 time and Indopug 1 time. Thats far from what you accused me of. Good day.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me04:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Primera fila
Hola! Como tengo entendido, RIAA cuenta con criterios distintos para los álbumes latinos, así que no descarto que Primera fila de Thalía sea disco de platino en EE.UU. ya que esta certificación se da después de 100.000 copias vendidas respecto a un álbum latino/hispano. Sony Music Latin también lo menciona en la noticia que anuncia el disco de platino en México, sin embargo yo también creo más en RIAA, siendo esta la entidad autorizada para anunciar tales certificaciones en Estados Unidos. Un cordial saludo. --El Mexicano (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can u help me and talk some sense into User:Groovemaneuvers? He has been removing content from P-Funk-related articles Go Fer Yer Funk and A Fifth of Funk, because according to him, the edits "were necessary because I generally do not feature album reviews for any P-Funk album article that I create. Since I was the one who created the article, I generally reserve the right to eliminate any additions not made by myself" (my talk page). I've tried to explain things simply to him at his talk page, but he doesnt seem to get it. Dan56 (talk) 21:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Third Strike (album)
If you feel that the article is not notable, please list it at WP:AFD so that there can be a deletion discussion so that a WP:CONSENSUS can be reached rather than just redirecting the page yourself. Alternatively, add {{Notability}} to show other users that the notability of the subject is questionable and this requests additional sources. I personally feel that the album is notable per WP:NALBUMS, as there is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and "its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label". Thanks. Mhiji (talk) 14:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is currently underway at this section of the nonfree content review page. As you previously participated in a talk page discussion on this matter, you may be interested in participating. SeraphimbladeTalk to me17:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lists of Pokemon
The lists of Pokemon were assessed as C, start, and stub for a reason. "List-class" is for when they have no chance at being real articles. They are lists of information that don't go into detail with anything. The articles like "List of Pokemon (1-50)" are actual articles with detailed information, or at least they should be. While the "Video Games" or "Anime and Manga" projects assess them as list class, WikiProject Pokemon still assess them as articles. Thanks, Blake(Talk·Edits)03:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Main page heads-up
Thanks for the note... I've been rather irked every time a page goes up and my only hint is the page being move protected. This one's an older FA I've been meaning to spruce up anyhow, so I needed the extra head-start. :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk)06:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am quite aware. However, the pages I moved to already existed. I moved from Camila (band) to Camila, and Camila to Camila (disambiguation). Then again, I think I should asked first. Magiciandude (talk) 18:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if you're aware, but your talk page is unreadable in classic skin (It appears as green text on a slightly-lighter green background) Raul654 (talk) 07:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LOL Tbhotch, you pinged me "Hi Legolas, who are you?" I was like WTF is this dude talking about? He he. I will do the necessary changes in "Halo" and update the sheet music. As for the issue regarding the autobots, I have now started making the changes like you showed. Thanks. — Legolas(talk2me)03:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you listed the above article as needing semi-protection to prevent sock puppetry. There's not been much activity on the article this month, but from the edit summaries it seems those two IPs are linked and this is a long term case of sock puppetry. I just want to confirm that's the situation before protecting as if it is a short period (such as a few days or a week) would be ineffective. Nev1 (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the way
Just thought I'd let you know I spoke to TeenToday and they said they'll be putting that article back up with The Labyrinth set list (so I hope they do). Umm how come you have a BLP template as your page notice? Weird! AnemoneProjectors02:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re: History merge
Hi Tbhotch, it's probably a caching problem. I've purged the page. I just imported an old edit from the Nostalgia Wikipedia to the Borg page; my process for doing this is described at User:Graham87/Import. I did remember to move the page back, as I usually do; obviously one of the servers couldn't catch up with my page moves. Graham8705:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question.
I have a question concerning an album "release history" section. If an album was released everywhere June 7, 2005, but were released through different labels in different regions, is it still important to have the section and tell what labels the album was released on or is that not necessary??
Orphaned non-free image File:Happy Music Video 2.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Happy Music Video 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 08:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff Ragsdale
Hi Tbhotch. You worked on Jeff Ragsdale's page at one time. Ragsdale is currently being harassed by IP number 71.190.77.101. This person, whom we have identified through correct legal means, is a fellow actor and he started his attack on Ragsdale by submitting a fake resume regarding Ragsdale on craigslist. Then said person started a commentary regarding Jeff Ragsdale's Wikipedia "notability". This whole issue has now snowballed into a "notability" issue on Wikipedia because of IP number 71.190.77.101's false claims regarding Ragsdale. My question to you is can you leave a message on Theda's page about your sentiments regarding Ragsdale's notability? Theda has since reinserted the notability tag on Ragsdale's Wikipedia page. Ragsdale is clearly a notable person. One would just have to look at the rich sources, and all of his television and film credits, as well as his international activism. Or could you possibly point me in other directions?
Richard Peterson 11-20-10 —Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardPeterson44 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ya, search and search. I don't know whether Cavie78 came up with anything or whether he will be satidfied with the two lines I added. If the film passes, we are ready for the Who's That GirlGood Topic submission. :) — Legolas(talk2me)04:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know, lol. That's why I won't submit the soundtrack for FA when I know it won't pass. I'm not mad like Petergriffin. As for the GT, ya even the You Can Dance GT can now be submitted, since the songs present on the album are already GAs. You reviewed one of them. :) — Legolas(talk2me)05:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. I meant that only, that's a good catch boy. So did you watch the AMA's tonight? I heard it was a horrible awards show where Justin Beiber won everything. He he. — Legolas(talk2me)05:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Haha. And people at pulsemusic are saying that the performances are so horrible that they actually have to give Ke$ha as the best performer of the night. That's saying sumthin. Katy Perry can't sing. flat-out. Rihanna's performances are getting a mess day by day, and Screamtina just screamed. That's what they said. Taylor is again..zzzzzzzzzzz. — Legolas(talk2me)05:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ya, and I refuse to see an awards show where Beiber won the Artist of the Year, although I might end up watching it as my wife is adamand to see Kesha's performance. :) — Legolas(talk2me)05:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hahahahahha I saw that Legolas! being two faced I see :p
Tbhotch has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as Tbhotch's Day! For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian, enjoy being the star of the day, Tbhotch!
I don't know what to say, just thank you Neutralhomer (and Rlevse) for this, and to Wikipedia, very nice place, I didn't expected this. again thanks. TbhotchTalkC.06:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Legolas for this very kind award, you know you deserve (more) the other half of it. Well I had a nice excellent day and these awards, wow just wow, Thank you so much. TbhotchTalkC.06:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For an strage reason I am good with them, (lol, more modesty of my part). This list, wow, just need a hand, and why not give it four (or more)? You can count with me :D. Happy Thanksgiving TbhotchTalkC.04:59, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shade throwing at me for not being good with tables?? Grrr. And yes, we need more than hands, we need all your hands, legs, feet, hair etc. etc to clean this up. Shocking that I have ignored this for so long, but I will get night mares if I ignore it further. Lol — Legolas(talk2me)05:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OH why hating Lovato' single? I really like it, and I like the message "be yourself". And for Halo, I'll wait for other comments at its PR (I don't think it'll have more) and re-take it for another PR, just in case something is missed. If it pass, I'll take "Cool" for the same. At the end, it was a FA and I just cleaned up it. Happy Thanksgiving TbhotchTalkC.05:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What's the point of that cleanup tag? I mean, the album was released LAST WEEK. The article gets updated every single day. I think your cleanup tag is about as useful as the calls to delete the article back in September. Pre-emptive and not very helpful. If I had the authority, I'd remove that useless tag, but I know how extreme editors get so I won't. That article is being rewritten constantly and I don't really think we have enough information for a proper introduction yet anyway. We need more time and sales information, clearly. But do you, dude. In my opinion, that tag is akin to vandalism considering that we really don't know that much about the album's commercial success yet. I'm strongly urging you to reconsider. (mikomango (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]
PS Congratulations on being a highly decorated Wikipedian. I suppose it's fair to assume that you're now above criticism so I expect nothing to come of my comment. Have a Happy Thanksgiving (mikomango (talk) 16:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Trinidadians don't do Thanksgiving either. Thanks for the clarification!!! But I honestly think it's going to take some time...we still need more info! (mikomango (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Well, it's a good start for it, for now it's OK, more informatioon will arrive and the lead should be expand with them. Happy Thanksgiving TbhotchTalkC.02:18, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
November 2010
I noticed the message you recently left to a newcomer. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Sometimes, the template says it best. I don't really care if the edit should have been reverted or not, but you should not curse at the newcomers.Courcelles21:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See my comments at AN3 and User talk:Mkativerata#Block of User:Chelo61. Your behavior in this dispute was definitely not appropriate; trying to win a content dispute by playing chicken with the 3RR line and then getting rid of your opponent is not the right way to do things. If you want to contest the wording in the article, you need to start a discussion at the talk page and invite Chelo and other editors to weigh in. rʨanaɢ (talk) 06:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
