User talk:Nyttend: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:54, 5 May 2011

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

DYK for St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Egypt, Ohio)

On 1 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Egypt, Ohio), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that St. Joseph has been in Egypt since 1852? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

4286 times

Speedy deletion nomination of Heritage Brewing

My comment "Quit freaking out and pissing off editors" was not a personal attack on you. It was a comment on the end result of the speedy deletion policy and how it is interpreted and implemented by various admins. In the end this type of deletion has caused many editors to get freaked out by admins who are too fast on the draw and also caused many editor to get so pissed off they never come back to wikipedia. The Heritage Brewing article should not have been an article for speedy deletion. If the article meet the criteria then I can identify many article that should also be deleted. Mr.Badlands (talk) 02:11, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clough Creek and Sand Ridge Archeological District

On 1 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clough Creek and Sand Ridge Archeological District, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the inhabitants of the Sand Ridge Site ate drums? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

5228 times

Requested move

Hi there, back in January last year you boldly turned Black Caviar into a redirect to Caviar diff. Anyway, there is currently a requested move underway at Talk:Black Caviar (horse)#Requested move which you may therefore be interested in. Please feel free to voice your opinion there if you wish. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk)

File:Eriemainstreet.jpg

Why is this photo being deleted? It is a historic photo prior to 1923 (thus no copyright). It one thing to not link a photo in an article but another thing to delete the photo because you think it shouldn't be linked in an article. I guess that I don't understand and would like to know the rule for deletion. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 22:47, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wut

Tell me why something like this needs to sit and stagnate in MFD for more than a day. Your declining the G2 is just process for the sake of process. Deletion reasons aren't chiseled in stone; common sense IAR deletions like this won't suddenly get you desysopped. Quit being a process wonk. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paulding County Carnegie Library

On 3 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paulding County Carnegie Library, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ohio's Paulding County Carnegie Library was the first Carnegie library in the United States to serve an entire county rather than an individual city? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:04, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Goddard (driver)

You correctly removed the incorrect csd tag on Mark Goddard (driver), replacing it with an {{rfd}} tag. However nearly 2 hours later you've not listed it at WP:RFD, and the edit summaries left by yourself and the csd tagger give no clues as to why it should be deleted. Accordingly I've removed the rfd tag, but should you still wish it deleted feel free to retag but please complete the nomination this time (ideally within a few minutes). Thryduulf (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I hadn't spotted that the CSD and RFD tags had been on the article simultaneously. Thryduulf (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 20:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 21:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Talk:West Washington Street Bridge (Muncie, Indiana).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Talk:W. W. Shirk Building (Muncie, Indiana).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Geneva College

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Geneva College: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --Flyguy33 (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bakersfield Country Club

Hello, my friend. You removed the Speedy tag from the above article, stating that the business "Has coverage from multiple reliable sources, so notable as well as important," but I respectfully disagree and hope you will look at the article again. There are three sources, two of which have the same information and neither of which is neutral and unbiased. The other source is the website of the organization itself, and it is the same website as under "External links." Please let me know your decision. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 01:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Euro 2020

Hi Nyttend, the edit history for UEFA Euro 2020 when it was deleted can be found at User:Avala/UEFA Euro 2020. The version that was deleted was substantially identical to the current article, in fact it was probably better. In that context I think it meets G4 and should be speedy deleted. I didn't want to delete it over your head given that you have already declined the CSD. What do you think? Regards, Woody (talk) 23:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, just saw your post at Talk:UEFA Euro 2020. I have to say I disagree with your interpretation of G4 and what is substantially identical. I don't see why a new AFD has to take place for what is substantially the same article saying the same things. There is no new content in the new article, in fact there is less. But hey, I will bow to your opinion if you still don't think it meets G4 as you dealt with initially. Regards, Woody (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re:Sanatoga Road

River Bend Farm is listed at the coords given on Wikipedia, easting, northing, etc. on the nomination form, match this. Nevertheless several things in the nomination seem to match the analogous position in the next river bend north. (From memory) the name of the road (Sanatoga - but lots of roads change names here), the name of the township (borders of these have changed as well), the position of the canal, "neighboring Fricks Lock". Maybe it's just wishful thinking since the listed site is locked off (and behind an old insane asylum!) Then throw in a nuclear power plant just to make it fun. In any case, next time I'm in the area, I'll get the best pix I can of both sites.

The reason I don't use the layers on the PA CRGIS site is that I use a Mac rather than a PC. The CRGIS forces users to use explorer as their browser, and the only one available for a Mac is about 10 years old and not supported anymore by microsoft. Ergo, I keep everything as simple as possible at the CRGIS site. The times I've tried to use layers it's taken an hour to tell me that I haven't gotten to first base yet. All the best. Smallbones (talk) 23:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's at the next river bend north 40°13′47″N 75°35′53″W / 40.229833°N 75.598056°W. There is a "River Bend Farm" there, and the pictures more or less match, the barn just burned down, and a resident says it was built 1760. Also for sale - should I put down a deposit for you? Smallbones (talk) 03:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

House
Barn burned down this winter
Neighbor across the river

Template:Kansas cities and mayors of 100,000 population

Greetings. I think this template probably warranted a deletion discussion again, as some issues stated in the previous deletion rationale have changed. In that discussion it was stated that the template only linked to two articles, whereas the version you deleted linked to three. Regards, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 00:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the content of the template is basically the same. I figured that the addition of the Gerlach article made the previous deletion reason no longer strictly true, as the nominator pointed out that "currently only two mayors even have links to an article." Now there are three. It seems to me that TFD is a better route here, but I'm not going to get all worked up over a minor template. Thanks, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 13:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide for me the proper interpretation of "this excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies..." (emphasis mine) under G4 at WP:CSD? Perhaps I am not understanding it correctly. Thanks, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 14:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NRHP in national parks

I've been working on reorganizing and creating NRHP listings in NPS units, and in particular am tidying up NRHP properties in Grand Teton National Park in support of Mongo's work toward making the main article an FA. I'd like to do a template focusing on the park similar to the Template:NRHP in Teton County, Wyoming, but focusing only on the park and omitting the redundant NRHP bottom bar. Since that template is set up only for counties, I'm having trouble reformatting it - I have no template mojo beyond a certain point. Can you look at Template:NRHP in Grand Teton NP and advise on what (presumably nested) parameters need to be adjusted or created for it to work? See the list already generated: National Register of Historic Places listings in Grand Teton National Park. Since some places, like Yellowstone, span multiple counties and states, I thought I'd start with an easy one first - GRTE's all in one county, but the template will have to accommodate more complex arrangements. I'll ask Dudemanfellabra as well. Acroterion (talk) 12:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm definitely not familiar with template coding. Virtually all of my template edits have been the ubiquitous county navboxes for communities, which I placed all over the country, but with all of them I simply copied and pasted code. The only thing I can suggest is what I've done with MPS and other local templates: you can see examples of my MPS templates at {{Samuel Hannaford and Sons TR}}, {{Cross-Tipped Churches}}, and {{Upper Prospect MRA}}, or you could check the non-MPS {{Archaeological NRHP in Hamilton County, Ohio}}. Nyttend (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's all right, I'm no master at templates and thought there might be something easy I was missing. I like the way the county template distinguishes between NHLs, HDs and so on, and could probably adapt templates I've used for French and Belgian fortifications, but there's probably a more elegant way to do it. Thanks for looking at it. Acroterion (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just stopped by to thank you for your helpful & commonsense edit here [1]. Best, Middayexpress (talk) 16:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Template talk:Did you know.
Message added 01:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deleting templates

Didn't realize I signed the comment at TFD incorrectly; my fault. Also, you missed Template:USMS designation. Thanks!--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 01:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BRD

The third step in WP:BRD is discuss, so I am looking forward to you participating in the discussion on the talk page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I am more than happy to change all the counties as well, if that is your only concern. The linked template was using the default coloring, so it doesn't appear that is an issue. As far as the other NRHP templates, I thought they had their own color scheme. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. The only complaint I have received is for Nevada (see the thread below yours on my talk page), so I changed those to use the {{NRHP style}} template. I really don't have a strong opinion on that one, just trying to make everyone happy and have some level of consistency. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An admin ought to know better

Than to engage in edit warring as you have quite clearly been doing at Terrace Park, Ohio once again. You should be ashamed of yourself for failing to participate in the talk page discussion. I shouldn't have to tell you that you don't own the page and you are supposed to discuss matters instead of revert warring. This is disgraceful behavior and needs to stop at once. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Dale

I noticed that you have removed Lily Dale from the "Other hamlets" section of Template:Chautauqua County, New York twice. However, there are many reasons why Lily Dale should be included in a list of Chautauqua County hamlets:

most of the references and external links in the Lily Dale article give some hint that it is a populated place
- here's a quote from this reference: "Susan Glasier, executive director of the assembly, who answers my many questions, tells me that the town is still seasonal, “although we have a permanent population of about 275 people."
the article Administrative divisions of New York defines a hamlet as a "community within a town that is not incorporated as a village but is identified by a name"
- this is exactly what Lily Dale is
I live in Chautauqua County and have traveled through Lily Dale more than once, and I have seen that it is a small hamlet
if you look at a detailed road map of Chautauqua County, it will show a few small streets in the southern Town of Pomfret with the name "Lily Dale" written beside it

Thanks for the reply, Nyttend. Although Lily Dale slightly resembles an intentional community or religious commune, I will try to make some changes to the article to show that Lily Dale is a populated place. (and sorry about not signing the comment above) —Reelcheeper (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User page

I cannot speak for Tbhotch, but I would assume the CSD nomination of ( Removed) was based on multiple violations of WP:UPNOT by a user blocked as a sockpuppet. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention massive BLP violations to such an extent that they merited suppression. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

F11 on File:CalendarBarreto.jpg

Hi, I noticed your rejection of my CSD F11 on File:CalendarBarreto.jpg, and was hoping for some feedback. My logic in tagging it was that there was a watermark on the image identifying a particular website, and no information was provided elsewhere to explain how the uploader had the authority over a picture so marked. Was that not a sufficient justification for an F11, and if it wasn't, what would be the proper venue to raise my concern over the uploader claiming it was their own, but it having a water mark? Thanks for any advice you can offer. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:22, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clarification on my talk page. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

T:DYK Nomination for HMS Polyanthus (K47)

Thanks for reviewing the article on HMS Polyanthus I submitted on the Did You Know nominations page. The hook is edited and shorter. Thanks again. Leidseplein (talk) 11:54, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Photos coming

Thanks for the heads up and for taking the pictures - hopefully they will not be photos taken in the pouring rain! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 12:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday was the first day of trout season, but it was pouring rain and quite cold, so I did not get any pictures of anglers - I would have needed a waterproof camera! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:35, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. I have only fished a few times in my life - I just wanted to get pictures of fishermen and fisherwomen on some streams I hope to write more about in the future. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greene Township, Trumbull County, Ohio

You have reverted my edit where I changed "It is the only Greene Township statewide, although there are sixteen Green Townships statewide." to "There are sixteen Green Townships statewide." Can I ask why? I changed it because the first version doesn't make sense. U+003F^? 13:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

You declined a speedy deletion of Gradate School of Design at Ewha Womans University on copyright grounds.

From the "Major in Fashion Design" section of the article:

"Based on the artistic originality, we are running the education course which can strengthen the design research ability. through the fashion image exhibition and fabric exhibition, we help our student to develop their own creative potential faculties and establish the own design research system. With the study of collection, settle own modelling and sensible identity and deal with the real problem of designing with the industrial business seminar. This special subject of study is aiming to train the professionals who will lead the industries and fashion education with the systematic research course which can help to develop the modeling, design thinking, planning and analyzing abilities."

The exact same text is repeated at [2] (click "Fashion Design").

From the "Major in Fabric Design" section of the article:

"Textile Design aims to cultivate textile related female professionals with flexible adaptability to the new mental modes of the rapidly changing 21st Century. In order to provide the specialist training demanded in the general textile related education and industry, this major cover diverse theoretical and practical approaches to promote skills in creativity, management, communication, and collaboration. The major also provides practical training opportunities for actual designing through active education-industrial collaboration projects."

The exact same text is repeated at [3] (click "Fabric Design").

And so on and so forth.

I don't want to go through every single section of the article to confirm exactly where on the original website the text has been lifted from, but I am confident that there is no properly free material in the article that is worth saving. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

East Brunswick Township, New Jersey

I am going to ask you to reverse your move of East Brunswick, New Jersey back to East Brunswick Township, New Jersey. While this should have been an uncontroversial move, I nominated it for a full disucssion. After a week there were no comments confirming that it was in fact not controversial. As a follow up two more were proposed and one of those has already been renamed and the other should be shortly. I don't see how you can ignore common name and the place naming convention. There is noting that I am aware of in the policies that says official names have preference. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Billings Metropolitan Area

Hi, I disagree with you! How can you not count the other counties that border Yellowstone County as part of Billings' Metro Area!? Wolfdog406 (talk) 03:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hodgen's Cemetery Mound DYK Review

Hi Nyttend, I see there's still some discussion regarding your alt on the nomination page, I'll review it once you've settled on a hook. Poliocretes (talk) 06:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for deleting my user pages. =) Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Museum Update

Hello!
I wanted to give you an update on the Children's Museum Wikipedia collaboration. You can check out my brief overview in the Children's Museum blog, which includes details on the Apprentice Program project to create five new Wikipedia articles as well as the image donation and use of the new Wikipedia Widget to link the museum's website to Wikipedia.

Last month we completed our first museum image content donation of 30 images. While this seems to be a low number, what makes the donation unique is the curatorial involvement in choosing and vetting the images for their appropriateness and usefulness within Wikimedia (many of the objects are copyrighted toys and other works that have copyright restrictions.) The curators in the collections department were very hands-on in their involvement, and we'll be outlining this process in an upcoming case study. If you would like to help further this process, I'd be happy for you to help disperse the images into useful Wikipedia articles, or let the appropriate WikiProjects know of the new images. Another 30 will be uploaded in the coming month.

In addition to the collaboration with the Museum Apprentice Program students and the curatorial department, another important collaboration was between User:Ealdgyth and the American Collections curators to significantly update the Broad Ripple Park Carousel article. After an impressive amount of time and work, the article has now received Featured Article status. The museum is absolutely thrilled and will now be adding a QR code to the carousel exhibit Carousel: Wishes and Dreams. In the future, more QR codes will be added to the objects that have had articles written by the MAP students. We're excited by the success of this collaboration & will also be writing a case study on the process.

There is now a recurring Indianapolis Update on the newly minted GLAM Newsletter. If you'd like to subscribe to the GLAM newsletter, you can do so here. Thanks! And let me know if you have any questions! HstryQT (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chimes Aviation Academy

Thank you for comparing this newly reported article against the previously deleted version. Not being an admin I wasn't able to read the previously deleted version. As you indicated, if this version is substantially different then that was not the most appropriate nomination. As the article is clearly unreferenced spam I have renominated it for CSD as spam. - Ahunt (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note, it is good to know that I got it right this time! I see that User:Syrthiss has deleted it this time. As you may have gathered from the records for this article, it keeps getting recreated by COI spammers to promote their school. - Ahunt (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is probably a good idea! - Ahunt (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - Ahunt (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rwhsmcas2010.gif

I'm not sure why you say it's "Not clear whether this is a US Department of Education image or a Minnesota government image" when the image is clearly sourced to http://education.state.mn.us/. This site also clearly states "Copyright 2011 Minnesota Department of Education" and you can see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 3 and the related commons deletion discussion for some more background as to why MN state works are not all PD. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I just saw you also untagged File:ArneCarlson2.jpg and File:Cy Thao portrait.jpg for similar reasons. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've listed the remaining image at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 April 21#File:Rwhsmcas2010.gif. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent block evasion at Nicole Kidman article

First, thank you for your efforts thus far -- I know how tiresome this sort of work can be for admins. Second, I inadvertently placed this same post at User:Daniel Case, who reviewed and turned down a block-lift request, thinking he had been the admin who'd instituted the block.

User:DeadSend4, aside from being uncivil, indeed borderline abusive, at his latest talk-page comments here, is apparently attempting to evade his block (See Nicole Kidman history here) through anon IP 24.92.19.152, which, despite this being its one-and-only edit, makes the same wholesale reversion that DeadSend4 has been making.

Another of the multiple editors he is warring with, User:Crohnie, also noted this at the above talk-page post. Again, thank you for your help. Judging from some of the comments made at the Wikiquette alert, this editor has been WP:OWNing the article for months now.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

file transfer from flickr

Are you familiar with transferring files from Flickr? I'm going to overhaul the George Franklin Barber article, and I want to move this image to Commons. It's published under a CC-BY-2.0 license. I've never transferred from Flickr, and I wanted to make sure there are no issues with this. Bms4880 (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. The house is the James A. Beck House, and is listed on the Register in Jefferson County, Iowa. Michael Tomlan mentioned this house in his bio of Barber in a reprint of one of Barber's catalogs. I'll try to find its catalog listing. Bms4880 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Spring Creek Site

On 23 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Spring Creek Site, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Spring Creek Site in western Michigan is a type site for Ottawa pottery? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Question about Ulrich Meyer-Bothling (eye surgeon)

I saw you contested my speedy deletion which is fine, buy could you clarify why it is not a resume? Yoenit (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that it's not the author's résumé; we have no reason to expect that Sir Andreas King is also Ulrich Meyer-Bothling, and if he's not, I don't believe it likely that he would be advertising him or posting his résumé. Given the way we write biographies, a résumé will be rather similar to a basic biography except that it's in a list format instead of in prose; since it's not that hard to recast lists into prose, the format itself isn't a good reason for deletion. Moreover, the sheer number of publications this guy has makes him important and perhaps rather likely to pass WP:BIO; it's irrelevant to a G11 speedy of course, but relevant to keeping. Nyttend (talk) 13:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Charles Silent

On 24 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Silent, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Charles Silent tried to resign from the Arizona Supreme Court almost immediately upon taking up the office? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Joseph Bloomfield Leake

On 24 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Bloomfield Leake, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Joseph Bloomfield Leake left the Iowa State Senate to serve in the American Civil War but was later elected back to the Senate? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Anil Kumar (disambiguation) delete

Hi there, thanks for checking into my speedy deletion. Please read the full discussion at Talk:Anil Kumar (businessman)#Requested move instead of just the headings; you'll see the following:

The first oppose thinks the disambiguation page should stay, which we all agree on; I didn't know disambiguation pages could be just moved as well (nor how redirects work), so am just trying to make room for that.
The second support suggests moving the disambiguation page, so that's the first step regardless. Deleting the redirect is holding that up.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by My2011 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry! I didn't know about the 1-week thing. My2011 (talk) 23:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a week! Hope all is well. :) My2011 (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- thanks again. My2011 (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Off to Denver on Thursday

If I can get everything in place by Thursday, I'll be off on a major road trip. Still haven't got my documentation etc in place.

Sometimes I think I can get carried away with things. In that respect I've added about 45 pix of Wildwoods Shore Resort Historic District (see the Commons cat). It's not an NRHP Historic District, only a New Jersey one. It does have 2 NRHP sites in it. And it probably doesn't strike many people as either historic or as worthwhile architecture. Well in any case, if somebody is going to criticize it I'd prefer it be done now (before I get another 30 photos of those damned motels- I'm only about 60% of the way finished). BTW, taking the pix was fun, uploading them was not.

All the best.

Smallbones (talk) 22:42, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the perspective and for the "hidden maps" - I've made a list and printed out a few. If you find the location of the new Denver site, could you leave a note on my talk page? As far as the perspective, I sometime think that folks looking at what I'm doing might think I'm entirely nuts - now at least I can say "but Nyttend is nuttier than me!" Seriously, though, it is enjoyable so I should care less about what others think. I do think I'll enjoy the trip as well. Thanks again. Smallbones (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hodgen's Cemetery Mound

On 27 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hodgen's Cemetery Mound, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that cranial deformation of a skull enabled archaeologists to identify the Adena as the builders of the Hodgen's Cemetery Mound in Tiltonsville, Ohio? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Doncram/Grand Forks County Fairgrounds WPA Structures

OK by me if you want to move User:Doncram/Grand Forks County Fairgrounds WPA Structures back to article space. I said (more than once) that all he needed to do was convince an administrator it was acceptable, and it does appear that has been accomplished by the improvements made to the page. --Orlady (talk) 01:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 'File:Arcelite through vipers.jpg'

I see that File:Arcelite through vipers.jpg has recently been deleted, citing WP:CSD#F5. This is a disappointment, as I had only yesterday added the rationale. I did not immediately place the image back in Elite (video game) because I was unaware that it was up for deletion so soon. Instead, I placed this talkback message on the page of the editor who removed the links to the images (with the intention of avoiding an edit war).

I strongly believe that the image added context to the article and should therefore like to propose its reinstatement. If you have any means of accessing File talk:Arcelite through vipers.jpg, the rationale should provide some explanation. Is it at all possible to reinstate the image please? If so, I'm happy to contribute to the justification of maintaining its presence.

Thanks for your time. --Trevj (talk) 07:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation.

Done Elite (video game)#Conversions --Trevj (talk) 12:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you --Trevj (talk) 13:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again. Is there any chance of also restoring File talk:Arcelite through vipers.jpg? ISTR it only has project tags on it, but perhaps I'm mistaken. --Trevj (talk) 13:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Freestanding template

Greetings. I noticed you closed a couple of my Speedy deletion requests. I'm just curious. How are templates that relate directly to a WikiProject that was deleted "freestanding". There is no reason to have a template inviting people to join a nonexistant project, nor is there a need for a WikiProject template for a project that doesn't exist. But thats just my opinion. --Kumioko (talk) 02:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buildings by year by country

Based on a series of previous discussions, that was the consensus. If you look at the architecture by year tree, you will see that most entries are there solely based on the year the building was built in. As such this is a feature of the building and is only indirectly related to architecture. If you look at the articles, you will see that virtually all of these fail to mention why they are architecturally significant. Hence that is not a defining feature for the building so they probably don't belong directly in an architecture category. However it is reasonable to classify buildings in the same manner that bridges have been for a while which is simply by year built. Vegaswikian (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of John Stewart image

Can you pls supply a reason why you think my reason for fair use is not acceptable? It's a PR shot provided by the company for this kind of use!

Same for pic of David Thodey!

WikiProject templates

They may not be subpages, but they are "pages dependent on a nonexistant page" and therefore fit G8. If you still think they don't, then surely they'd fit G6 (housekeeping) — it's a complete no-brainer. No one's going to protest if you delete a template belonging to a now-deleted Wikiproject. Don't be such a process wonk. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Census

I noticed you have reverted some population numbers citing no source. While they definitely need a source, the census numbers are available at http://factfinder2.census.gov. Rather than revert to old, outdated information, why not simply add the new source? It's going to be a generic source anyway because the new FactFinder2 site doesn't allow you to bookmark the pages, so you have to find the page you want every time. As for the New Albany article, I'm not sure what the problem is with either source you removed. "ThisWeekNews" is a local newspaper website for that area (see Contact Us); it's not like city-data.com or another site that merely collects stories or data from somewhere else, so it seems to fit reliability to me. Interestingly enough, if you go to the bottom of the main page for that site, there is also a link to county-level census data from the Columbus Dispatch. --JonRidinger (talk) 15:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Middlesex County, Massachusetts

As you were the creator of this template, I thought you might want to see its talk page for a suggestion being made there.

Thank you.

RedSoxFan274 (talk ~contribs) 00:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion

Because you have declined to delete a couple of images I tagged (one of which was crying out for deletion, the other admittedly a little less so) I have FfD-ed them. In future, please be more careful, since your removal of the speedy-tags has added a needless level of delay and bureaucracy to what should be a simple process. ╟─Treasury Tag►senator─╢ 22:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have a reply... ╟─Treasury Tag►constablewick─╢ 22:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at TreasuryTag's talk page.
Message added 22:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DYK for George Stumpf House

On 3 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Stumpf House, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the American Civil War delayed the construction of the George Stumpf House in Indianapolis by nearly 10 years? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:02, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at TreasuryTag's talk page.
Message added 13:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Image permission but too late

Hi, several hours after you deleted File:Horeb Mill 2011.jpg, its creator put a message on its talk page. Is this valid permission? Whether it is or it isn't, what is the procedure to follow? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite, but I've left a note on the uploader's talk page explaining what to do. Nyttend (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wulfrida

I see that you reversed speedy deletion of Wulfrida back in 2007, so please note that I have now nominated the article for deletion. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restore?

Could you please restore User:Baseball Watcher/Sandbox? I was just testing with it. Thanks. Baseball Watcher 02:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re undoe on Kelleys Island page

you wrote: (Undo, because those are insufficient citations: we need to have publication information in order to confirm that these really have been published and that they're reliable) What information do you require? There are two books about the history of Kelleys Island and over 100 sources are cited. The books contain a total of over 740 pages of original documentation, records and stories. Kelleys Island 1810-1861 - The courageous, poignant & often quirky oives of island pioneers was published in 2009 ISBN 978-0-9819612-1-7. Kelleys Island 1862-1865 - The Civil War, the Island Soldiers & the Island Queen was published in 2010 ISBN 978-0-9819612-2-4. If you need more documentation, just let me know.

@@ Line 361: / Line 361: @@
 Could you please restore User:Baseball Watcher/Sandbox? I was just testing with it. Thanks. <font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Baseball Watcher|<span style="color:red;">'''Baseball'''</span>]][[User talk:Baseball Watcher|<span style="color:blue;">''' Watcher'''</span>]]</font> 02:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
+== Re undoe on Kelleys Island page ==
+you wrote: (Undo, because those are insufficient citations: we need to have publication information in order to confirm that these really have been published and that they're reliable)
+What information do you require? There are two books about the history of Kelleys Island and over 100 sources are cited. The books contain a total of over 740 pages of original documentation, records and stories. Kelleys Island  1810-1861 - The courageous, poignant & often quirky oives of island pioneers was published in 2009 ISBN 978-0-9819612-1-7. Kelleys Island 1862-1865 - The Civil War, the Island Soldiers & the Island Queen was published in 2010 ISBN 978-0-9819612-2-4. If you need more documentation, just let me know.