Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:I forgot to add that the user had already been warned once before after this attack om another user. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jaakko_Sivonen&diff=next&oldid=86294815] [[User:JdeJ|JdeJ]] 12:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC) |
:I forgot to add that the user had already been warned once before after this attack om another user. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jaakko_Sivonen&diff=next&oldid=86294815] [[User:JdeJ|JdeJ]] 12:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
==={{User|208.101.4.34}}=== |
|||
Serious personal attacks on Tamil people[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ALahiru_k%2FUserBox%2FSupports_the_Troops&diff=87986863&oldid=87980378] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ALahiru_k%2FUserBox%2FSupports_the_Troops&diff=87903778&oldid=82258261]. Twice. The user's talk page has many many warnings already. --<b>[[User:Sechzehn|<font color="#RED">16</font>]]</b><sup>[[User_talk:Sechzehn|<font color="#RED">T</font>]]</sup> 15:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Place new reports on top --> |
<!-- Place new reports on top --> |
||
==Open reports== |
==Open reports== |
Revision as of 15:35, 15 November 2006
![]() | This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
![]() | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
This page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Wikipedia's No Personal Attacks policy
For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:
For users handling assistance requests:
Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers. |
New reports
User Jaakko Sivonen (talk · contribs) has removed content from the page of another user and made a strong personal insult. [1]
The edit comment is Finnish for 'f_ck you' or 'f_ck off'. JdeJ 09:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I forgot to add that the user had already been warned once before after this attack om another user. [2] JdeJ 12:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
208.101.4.34 (talk · contribs)
Serious personal attacks on Tamil people[3] [4]. Twice. The user's talk page has many many warnings already. --16T 15:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Open reports
Please warn user NazireneMystic to refrain from personal attacks and remove offending material from the Talk:Ebionites page (from [5] to the end of the talk page). This user posted his user page Here I will show evidence of notibility and VfD proceedings of a deleted stub Articals for deletion log for Ebionite restoration movement complete with to meatpuppets and one admin that may had been duped by User:Ovadyah|Ovadyah on the talk page along with numerous personal attacks against myself and another editor (eg. seeArtical POV and [6].
If reading about your actions feels like a personal attack change your actionsNazireneMystic 08:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
This user has ignored repeated requests to respect Wikiquette guidlines posted on the talk page and has been given two prior npa3 warnings about personal attacks, Good faith? and meatpupppets. Thank you. Ovadyah 03:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I dought there is a guidline wikipedia has that you not only break every day but lawyer around them to use them for reason contrary to what they were meant for from what ive seen if an action were taken against me compaired to what ive had to put up with from you it would be like getting a speeding ticket at the Brick Yard 400NazireneMystic 08:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- This user was also asked to stop one last time on talk page again after receiving the second npa3 warning[7]. Ovadyah 04:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Ovadyah,
You can ask me to stop exposing your wikipedian lawyering tactics 1000 times but I do not care. If I did not almost daily point out how your tring to dominate the Ebionite artical with extreme POV it would had been totaly over ran months ago. Your upset because someone is calling you on your endless crap. If I were a nice guy I would had been ran off the artical long ago like you did to keith ackers who is actualy listed as a scholar and source for the artical if who ever is reading this realy cares to learn whats been going on contact Keith for one and he might tell you how these wikipedians have been acting and be sure to take the time to go through the archive pages so you can see the wild tactics used so far to push Ovadyah's POV its been quiet an experience here at wikipedia. If ovadyah is sensitive then Ovadyah should not be ingaging in such thingsNazireneMystic 08:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
This user constantly trolls my contribution logs. I am changing my request to a warning and a temporary block. I have also invited several editors involved in the Ebionites article or AfD to comment. Ovadyah 08:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Did you invite the other meatpuppet?NazireneMystic 08:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I alerted co-editor Loremaster, Alecmconroy from RFC, and admin Jayjg to the notice, if they wish to expand on my comments. Ovadyah 14:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Neither of you are behaving very well in this instance. Ovadyah, please provide specific diffs. Proto::type 15:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- As no warning (other than some unnecessary ones from Oyidah at an earlier date) were issued, I've warned NazireneMystic for this edit, which was unacceptable. I would hope that unless he/she continues making edits of this kind, the matter is now closed. Proto::type 15:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Administrator blows referee whistle - this is not the place to conduct a dispute. 24 hour block issued. DurovaCharge! 01:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. It should be noted, however, that this user has already evaded the block by copying his talk page to another alias, User_talk:SpiritualEbionite. Ovadyah 01:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Donnachadelong often makes insulting or derogatory comments to me or other editors. He was warned three times about this. 1 2 3
right-wing wreckers and POV-pusher – other "right-wing wrecker" he is mentioning is User:172
clearly you do have a problem understanding plain English
Are you deliberately dense or just plain stupid?
God some of you people talk rubbish.
You're like the Mormons with their post-mortem conversions.
bleedin' minority who dig up graves
-- Vision Thing -- 22:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- 31 hour block. DurovaCharge! 01:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
This user attacked me and the PanoTools Group several times and this is now my third PAIN. The latest attack can be seen here [8]. As you can see on his talk page he already got several admin warnings [9], [10], [11], [12] including a Personal Attacks - Last Warning [13] for his older attacks which you can find in this history [14], [15]. As you can imagine we (The members of PanoTools.org) are really tired of this person. Please help. --Wuz 02:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and left a 48 hour block for violations of WP:CIVIL. Suggest Wikipedia:Dispute resolution: it's unlikely that civility blocks alone would resolve this issue. If the person seems unwilling to compromise then try a user conduct WP:RFC. DurovaCharge! 03:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)