Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 19:38 on 11 November 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

User-reported

• TJ1523 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Stale report. User has not edited in 12 hours. WaggersTALK 15:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

• Bblqk37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Cairngorm Club (diff):. Not really sure where this fits, but I needed to highlight a problem with this account whose first edit is this (mentioning the same club and making legal threats against Drchriswilliams). M.Bitton (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

  Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

  • I see what you mean M.Bitton! Given they've now removed the legal threat from their talk page I think we can take that as withdrawn. There's clearly a bit of a COI with the Cairngorm Club, and that behaviour does call into question the rest of their edits, many of which look reasonably constructive at first glance. I think for now you were right to warn them but a block would be premature, but definitely one to keep an eye on. WaggersTALK 15:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
    • @Waggers: For good measure, I have left a COI notice on their talk page. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)