Jump to content

User talk:Yevrowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by IanOsgood (talk | contribs) at 17:56, 29 May 2022 (→‎Makruk diagram: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:ChernyavskiyDL.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CyberBerkut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CyberBerkut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberBerkut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Львівське (говорити) 07:20, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CyberBerkut. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Львівське (говорити) 07:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning to stop edit warring and explain your actions (removing tags, restoring unsourced info, etc.) or I'll have to file a report --Львівське (говорити) 15:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All the facts are publicly available sources! You are the administrator? Yevrowl (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakra (chess variant)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chakra (chess variant) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aurora Police Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Police lieutenant moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Police lieutenant, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Police lieutenant (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RetroCraft314 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lieutenant#Police rank instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Would be more inclined to accept if the page contained more information than the aforementioned section, but either way the lieutenant page isn't terribly long, at least not long enough to justify WP:SPLITTING it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
<RetroCraft314 /> 19:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yevrowl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <RetroCraft314 /> 19:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Yevrowl! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Police lieutenant has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Police lieutenant. Thanks! AmericanAir88 (talk) 20:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Police lieutenant (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Lieutenant. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maladolescenza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Loeb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bristol Type 172 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bristol Type 172 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bristol Type 172 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello Yevrowl, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Shmuel Kaminetsky have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 11:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blood and Concrete moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blood and Concrete, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Almaz panel.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Almaz panel.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1292simon (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Lwów (1941) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Lwów (1941), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Lwów (1941) has been accepted

Battle of Lwów (1941), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Astronomical chess moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Astronomical chess, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moses Ingram moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Moses Ingram, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - The9Man (Talk) 10:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yosyf Zisels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astronomical chess has been accepted

Astronomical chess, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yosyf Zisels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Ingram (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:TOOSOON. Needs more external news sources that focus on Ingram's career. Only one role so far (Queen's Gambit), so this would be a redirect to that show. Needs more multiple lead roles on notable productions to meet WP:ENT
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Derman tragedy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derman tragedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derman tragedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bidon (container) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bidon (container), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bidon (container) (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references. Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blood and Concrete

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blood and Concrete".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood and Concrete (December 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by I dream of horses was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There haven't been any major changes since the last time the draft was declined. I guess that means there are no changes to be made.
I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 06:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MAG Audio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MAG Audio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mys_721tx (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice your objection to the deletion of this article, so I thought I'd leave you a note in regards to it. MAG Audio (widely used abbreviated name MAG) ("widely used" according to what reliable and independent source?), professional acoustic systems ("professional" according to what reliable and independent source?), The company’s products are presented through official distributors in more than 35 countries of the world and used in more than 5,000 installations in over 100 countries. (as confirmed by what reliable and independent source?), ...quickly gained worldwide recognition, ("quickly gained worldwide recognition" according to what reliable and independent source?). And so on from there. Each fact in an article requires a reliable, independent source, and you were talking up this company without in any way providing sources for what you said about it. Going forward, please ensure you provide a citation to a reliable and independent source for each and every factual statement you make in an article. In this case, the unsourced statements amounted to promotional material. Seraphimblade Talk to me 12:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bidon (container) (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Acoustic systems" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Acoustic systems. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 1#Acoustic systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Syberia: The World Before for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syberia: The World Before is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syberia: The World Before until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 02:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blood and Concrete

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blood and Concrete".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bidon (container)

Information icon Hello, Yevrowl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bidon (container), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bidon (container)

Hello, Yevrowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bidon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by IceWelder were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
One reliable source (and therein only a routine news article) is not sufficient for notability. The Development section is entirely unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
IceWelder [✉] 18:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Wikipedia articles need to be based upon sources that show how the subject is notable. This means that the sources must be primarily on the subject, and they must at least briefly describe the subject's main aspects. Ideally, such sources are monographs or equivalent books. Sources that mention the article's subject in a side note, such as the sources provided in this draft, are not sufficient to establish notability.

Please also not that articles in the English language version of Wikipedia should be written in proper English. I find this draft difficult to read because of its mediocre grammar and counter-intuitive syntax. Best regards, --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please read WP:REF
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is a borderline reject, but only declining for now to give it another chance. The sources cited are not WP:RS (and one doesn't even work), therefore unable to establish notability. Also, too much of the contents, eg. all the biographical details, are unreferenced, which is unacceptable in a WP:BLP article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A review section with at least three or four in-depth reviews in reliable sources would be the easiest way to show notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-- Greetings, @Bilorv:! I went through all the sources I could find. The game review is Gamepressure and Rock Paper Shotgun, as well as on Steam. Yevrowl (talk) 13:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steam is a primary source, and user reviews are user-generated content (not reliable). I read the Gamepressure and Rock Paper Shotgun sources before declining, and I'm doubtful that Gamepressure is reliable, but even if it is this would not be sufficient coverage to show notability. If a topic is not notable, we can't host an article on it (no matter how well written a draft is). — Bilorv (talk) 14:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alien with a grenade. UFO2: Extraterrestrials first look (in Russian) — Is this review resource okay? Yevrowl (talk) 22:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFO2Extraterrestrials: Battle for Mercury (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Based on the sources I have looked at, it is highly unlikely that it will pass the notability threshold. I would consider it a probable permanent fail for WP:GNG but I might be missing reviews from other countries.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sorry, but the sources presented do not establish why this individual is notable enough to merit inclusion in English Wikipedia.

Please present significant coverage about the subject in newspapers, magazines, on television, or academic work cover Dolinsky's contributions.

They can be in any language. Thanks.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 22:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduard Isaakovich Dolinsky (February 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
S0091 (talk) 21:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Yosyf Zisels. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuri Alimovich Volodarsky (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Three sources, each cited only once, is nowhere near enough to support the contents; most of the article is completely unreferenced.

Also, the sources appear to consist of two articles and one primary source, which is arguably not enough to establish the notability of the subject beyond doubt.

This draft was earlier declined for lack of sources and unproven notability, and has been resubmitted without addressing either issue. Please ensure that both problems are sufficiently resolved before resubmitting. Thank you.

--
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aurora Police Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makruk diagram

Nice job on the Makruk diagram template! A few comments: 1. A lighter board color would probably work better to show the white pieces. 2. In the initial position the kings are not in opposition, allowing the mets to attack each other. Kings should be on d1 and e8. --IanOsgood (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yevrowl&oldid=1090470674"