Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 04:19 on 15 June 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
- 1.47.147.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) — notorious sockpuppeteer from ruwiki who has a habit of persistently asking people to patrol specific articles. He is currently disrupting my talk page with his requests. — Summer 19:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi SummerKrut, can you provide at least one example of where this has happened earlier? I have warned the user for now, but I'll happily block if this wasn't the first case. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- This user often tries to hide the fact that he is evading blocks by sending emails with patrolling requests from freshly-registered accounts to users who have the rights needed for it, although we just generally report them to administrators so that the administrators could indefblock them. I have asked a ruwiki checkuser who is very familiar with this sockpuppeteer to comment here. — Summer 20:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Okay; I'm specifically looking for examples from the English Wikipedia, ideally from a now-blocked account. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- This user often tries to hide the fact that he is evading blocks by sending emails with patrolling requests from freshly-registered accounts to users who have the rights needed for it, although we just generally report them to administrators so that the administrators could indefblock them. I have asked a ruwiki checkuser who is very familiar with this sockpuppeteer to comment here. — Summer 20:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi SummerKrut, can you provide at least one example of where this has happened earlier? I have warned the user for now, but I'll happily block if this wasn't the first case. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- 180.195.198.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On CNN Philippines (diff): vandalism after final warning. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- 66.154.208.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This user was automatically reported by Huggle due to reverted vandalism after a final warning. Please verify their contributions carefully, it may be a false positive. Morneo06 (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses from educational institutions. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- 74.62.124.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including: 1 ProofRobust 21:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- IReallyHateWikipeedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. See this edit. No warnings given, but seems like a threat. SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 21:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)