Jump to content

User talk:Nikki311

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Movieman2008 (talk | contribs) at 08:09, 3 January 2009 (→‎Thanks: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ATTENTION: I'm on vacation right now and don't have regular internet access. I won't be back to my regular editing schedule until January 4 or 5. Nikki311 02:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh...

I wasn't turning the talk page into a forum. I was talking about how to improve the article and i was pleased that a change had been made to improve the quality of the article. Henceforth, Ms. Hemme's breasts are much more wonderfully shown in the new main picture on the article about her now on Wikipedia. The picture truly displays her better. I don't get why you people get so up in arms about these types of things. It's the truth. TonyFreakinAlmeida (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you have time...

could you please throw in you opinion here. I would appreciate it. Thanks. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 13:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nikki311 18:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I haven't had a chance to look over this article yet, but I'll do some proofreading soon. I came across a source that you might find helpful: http://www.wwe.com/inside/listthis/greatestwhoamances/greatwhoamances9. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very helpful! Thanks! Nikki311 18:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure whether you can do this

Copyedit No Way Out (2004) and Bad Blood (2003), but seeing your message at the top seems like you cant.--SRX 21:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for being able to review the articles! I hope I fulfilled your comments! Also, if you can do a check on somebody, don't know if it's uncivil or not, but it's very weird. [1]--SRX 22:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weird? Yes. Uncivil? Probably not. I'll get to Bad Blood pretty soon, hopefully. Nikki311 01:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bad Blood done. Nikki311 00:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think some of the recent edits are vandalism: the exact words used in the source are "We talked about Joey's past relationship with Mickie James and what exactly happened to them." An user editing the Adam Birch article is using that as a source that they have broken up, making the two articles contradict each other. --Snigbrook (talk) 22:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Recent Project News
This Fortnight in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
  • We have now reached our goal of getting the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 586. It still would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
Professional wrestling
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 3 5 8
FL 1 12 10 23
GA 6 25 60 91
B 1 16 64 203 284
C 1 14 84 99
Start 2 50 214 1766 2032
Stub 1 21 564 586
List 2 23 576 601
Future 2 17 19
Assessed 3 77 378 3285 3743
Unassessed 1 1
Total 3 77 378 3286 3744
Member Updates
Recent Wrestling News
Collaboration
Cast your vote to select the next collaborations — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Recent Deletion Debates
Contributors to this Issue

DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 19:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Move Request

There's a move at WP:PW/ANC that needs an admin to move it, It's the first one.--SRX 22:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You caught me online at a good time. :) Done. Nikki311 22:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! You're the best!--SRX 01:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nikki. Long time no talk. ;) Anyway, I was looking through the history of the cleanup listing and I noticed that a bot updated the page here and here but hasn't done so since. I was wondering (since you set it up) if you knew why? Having the bot update it would be kind of useful. :) ♥NiciVampireHeart22:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. :) Yea, I don't understand that either. He'll update it when he can, basically. Cool. Thanks, ♥NiciVampireHeart10:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gophers basketball

Hi - thanks for your review of Minnesota Golden Gophers men's basketball. I believe I addressed all of your initial concerns regarding the article, with the exception of the default hidden season-by-season template. I went to about 30 articles trying to find one that was collapsed by default so I could copy the code, but I couldn't find any. I'm not sure if that means that it's not possible to code, or if I just looked in the wrong spot. If you have any more suggestions or concerns you would like me to address, either for GA status (or hypothetically for future FA status), please let me know and I'll address them as soon as possible! matt91486 (talk) 22:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Thanks so much for doing this. I believe I've addressed all of your points (most of them by changing the article, one of them by disagreeing with you slightly); I'd appreciate another look whenever you have the chance. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 02:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great - thanks again! Sarcasticidealist (talk) 00:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Trust me, I won't be a stranger. ;) I'll still help with professional wrestling articles and such, but I'm doing some new things now. I'll be around. ;) iMatthew (talk) 10:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY BIRTHDAY! iMatthew (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HB

Happy Birthday!--WillC 00:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It was the least I could do.--WillC 01:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Happy Birthday Nikkie, wish you the best on your special day!--SRX 15:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica Mars GA review

Thanks for your review. I've made modifications per your recommendations--which make perfect sense to me, thanks--and I believe the article to be ready for a re-review. Thanks! Jclemens (talk) 03:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your quick re-review! Jclemens (talk) 02:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday! (although I think I'm a bit late.) Anyways, Jclemens and I are now submitting the article for peer review: Wikipedia:Peer review/Veronica Mars/archive2. We want to ahieve FA status, and your thoughts would be apprectiated. Thanks, Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 05:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
You deserve this for all your hard work in cleaning up every wrestling article on wikipedia! Keep up the good work! ♥NiciVampireHeart19:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Nikki311. You have new messages at Aervanath's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey Nikki, I've been collecting a list of possible good and featured topic, feel free to add as many as you can think of. iMatthew (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you know how to make the covert template say foot instead of feet? That is something that is wanted changed in Lockdown's FAC and I don't know how.--WillC 02:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Hey could you read over Lockdown and tell me anything that should be cut down? Length in a problem in the review and I do not know what is needed and not needed.--WillC 01:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to confirm, all the points you raised have now been addressed, hopefully to your satisfaction -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Recent Project News
This Fortnight in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
  • We have now reached our goal of getting the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 588. It still would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
Professional wrestling articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 3 5 8
FL 1 12 10 23
GA 6 27 60 93
B 1 16 64 203 284
C 1 15 86 102
Start 2 50 213 1774 2039
Stub 1 20 566 587
List 2 22 581 605
Future 2 15 17
Assessed 3 77 378 3300 3758
Total 3 77 378 3300 3758
Member Updates
Recent Wrestling News
Collaboration
Cast your vote to select the next collaborations — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Recent Deletion Debates
Contributors to this Issue

DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 18:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Request

Hey, how are you doing? I don't talk to you much. I might as well try to become your friend. As well as I have a request that maybe you can give me a pointer or two on how to right production sections. See in Slammiversary (2008), a man died after the event. I was going to place it in the production section but first I need to write a production section and know what info is needed in it. Maybe you can help me out?--WillC 09:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Lakers GA

Hi Nikki311, i tried to do what you said in the review, is it better? Or is there still alot to do? Thanks. BlueRed 05:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what are the things you see that are still wrong with the article? Oh and there are users reverting vandalism from the article, would that effect the article's chances of becoming a GA? There is a section on the talk page that says that it might effect the article chances of becoming a GA. I just want to make sure. BlueRed 06:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure about sectioning Jerry Reinsdorf, but I have the rest up to GA standards, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Recent Project News
This Fortnight in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
  • We have now reached our goal of getting the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 591. It still would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
Professional wrestling articles Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 3 5 8
FL 1 12 10 23
GA 6 27 60 93
B 1 16 64 207 288
C 1 14 96 111
Start 2 50 219 1759 2030
Stub 1 20 565 586
List 2 21 580 603
Future 2 16 18
Assessed 3 77 382 3297 3760
Total 3 77 382 3297 3760
Member Updates
Recent Wrestling News
Collaboration
Cast your vote to select the next collaborations — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Recent Deletion Debates
Contributors to this Issue

DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 21:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)


TNA Bound for Glory

Thanks for doing a copyedit on TNA Bound for Glory. I haven't had alot of time to work on it.--WillC 02:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what do you think BFG's chances are at making GA right now are?--WillC 02:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, can you wait maybe a week? Since I'm working on the final product in a subpage. It will take me a few days since it has become my least favorite piece of work. I have alot of school work to get done and I'm trying to get Hard Justice, No Surrender, and Slammiversary all ready for GA reviews. I have a few new sources to place in the article and more info on traditions of the event. I would much rather you see the finished product since I haven't updated that thing since the day of Bound for Glory IV and I haven't fully finished the article anyway. It isn't my best work and I don't want an experienced editor such as yourself finding simple mistakes that I should have caught and you getting the wrong idea about my work. I feel I've come a long way since Lockdown in June. I remember how bad it was.--WillC 03:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I just want to show you, the first person to see anything I wrote, that I've learned from your advice and improved as a result. I'll let you know in a few days. Thanks, and talk to you soon.--WillC 03:37, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey can you delete The Motor City Machine Guns? It is a redirect and I want to move Motor City Machine Guns there since that is their official name and per WP:THE.--WillC 03:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestler's Rescue

Hi Nikki, I noticed that you shortened the info I added on the Torrie Wilson page concerning Wrestler's Rescue. I saw that you mentioned it being not notable enough, but I was not sure exactly what you were considering not notable? Reason for my asking is simply because I was planning on spending some time creating a page specifically for Wrestler's Rescue itself. I felt that with all the media attention it garnered that it would be well worth adding to Wikipedia. Could you let me know if you feel that this effort would be worth while? Thanks RingWars2007 (talk) 18:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • I see what your saying although the event was covered by Sirius Radio on a few of thier channels, Newsday, and My Network 9 to name a few. Problem is I have not had the time to go through all the archived info I have on it to notate everything. Also, this media specifically noted Torrie Wilson, Mick Foley, Brimstone, and Bumblefoot as major players in the success of the event which is why they were specified rather than a ridiculous list of celebrities at the event. What should I do? RingWars2007 (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Could you pull out your mop? On Talk:Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder, a user announced they had created a page for Zack Ryder. For some reason they created it at Hapalwld. Per here and the section immediately below it, they shouldn't have their own pages, especially not one at the wrong name. Any chance of you deleting it, or should I take it to AfD? ♥NiciVampireHeart00:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorted, Thanks. ;) ♥NiciVampireHeart00:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User that needs blocked.

Hey, sorry to do this again Nikki but This user needs blocked, I've warned him the four times I should and he's still at it. Best Wishes...SteelersFan94 15:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye on him/her. Thanks for bringing them to my attention. Nikki311 22:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks for listening. --SteelersFan94 23:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey sorry to bother you again but, have you been paying attention to the WWE roster page? it's full protected, to me it all comes from User: talk:Vjmlhds, I warned him about breaking the 3RR and two hours later he's back at it. Can he be blocked for edit waring or something. This may seem a little rude on my part, but I just want to get someone who knows a LOT more than me. Thanks SteelersFan94 18:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barney Gumble

Hey Nikki, User:Tj terrorible1 has re-added Barney's article to GAC and removed your comment, no worries, I reverted the edit. Thought I should let you know. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. I left a note on the GAN talk page and his talk page about it. He might end up blocked if he continues to be disruptive. Nikki311 22:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, just wanted let you know. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that guy is pretty annoying. You'll copyedit the article and bring it up to MOS, then he'll make 20 edits in which he slowly reverts you bit by bit and he refuses to use the talk page. Anyway, I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at Bart Simpson. I would like to have the article FA ready by next Friday (7th) but I figured I'd try a GAN in hopes of getting some helpful comments and I'm going to withdraw it if I don't get any comments by then. So, if you could take a look at any point during the next week, I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Scorpion0422 23:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User 68.10.141.135

Now they're trying to hide by blanking their page. Maxwell7985 (talk) 03:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User AdonisRouse

Once again you think you own Melina by deleting valuable information. Anyone who watches WWE knows that her and Melina perform that move. You do not own Melina's article, stop moving pictures around as if you uploaded it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdonisRouse (talkcontribs) 00:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will do the same to you if you make personal attacks at me again —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdonisRouse (talkcontribs) 00:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Recent Project News
This Fortnight in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
  • We have now reached our goal of getting the number of Stub-Class articles below 600. The current count is 592. It still would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.
Professional wrestling
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 3 5 8
FL 1 12 10 23
GA 6 27 60 93
B 1 16 65 207 289
C 1 14 96 111
Start 2 50 219 1759 2030
Stub 1 21 566 588
List 2 21 581 604
Future 3 14 17
Assessed 3 77 385 3298 3763
Total 3 77 385 3298 3763
Member Updates
Recent Wrestling News
Collaboration
Cast your vote to select the next collaborations — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Recent Deletion Debates
Contributors to this Issue

DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 15:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Rhonda Sing

Nikki, I have listed the Rhonda Sing article you nominated as a good article. Congratulations and thanks for your hard work. I also wanted to mention that I was having troubles transcluding the review to the talk page. I think the link in the GA header is sufficient, but if you can and want to figure it out be my guest. Thanks again, mitico (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you get a chance, can you look this over? Thanks, iMatthew 22:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nikki311 23:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NM '07

The thing is, NM is not near GA quality, it needs major rewording, just by seeing the lead, the entire article must have problems: "in a Giant wooden structure" - this is to wordy. Plus, the BG has to much detail, needs to be cut down. The other thing, this article is in OOU but in the old format, like SummerSlam (2003), it needs to be in the new updated one like in No Way Out (2004). These are just a few things I see, but I would let the original reviewer have another look at it.--SRX 01:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

Can you also copyedit Over the Edge (1999) for me? Thanks.--SRX 19:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if you had time to do this?--SRX 00:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not right now. I have someplace to be in an hour. I can get to it tomorrow night after work. Nikki311 00:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Nikki311 03:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I responded to your comments at the PR.--SRX 03:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Wikipedia_talk:PW#Katsuji_Adachi_.3E_Mr._Hito RandySavageFTW (talk) 21:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Nikki311 03:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You know more about production section and other stuff of that nature than I do. I just finished Slammiversary (2008) and someone died after the event. I've never wrote any section like that before. I just got done writting it and would like to get an opinion on it, I had no clue what I was doing. See Slammiversary (2008)#Incident--WillC 11:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I moved it. How is the prose in the section?--WillC 20:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Have you ever thought about trying to take WrestleMania (1985) to FA? It is a very important article in my mind and it would be great to have as an FA.--WillC 23:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, if you need any help with it let me know. I try to keep the PPV expansion list at WP:PW as up to date as I can and saw WrestleMania sitting there at GA and thought that would be a good article to have as an FA. I thought to ask if you ever thought about doing it. Just remember my offer, I'll help give a copyedit or some feed back. I don't work on WWE articles much but WrestleMania should be an FA, which I'll be happy to help with.--WillC 00:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me likey..

I like your new signature! iMatthew 19:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Nikki311 20:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I Love it 2! We all need a change here and then.--SRX 01:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scream/Childhood

Hi Nikki, I have done most of the corrections. I'm a little stuck on the tenses thing. The thing is, English isn't actually my first language, I get tenses mixed and can't spot my errors as you can see. Would it be possible if you could fix those, for me it is like looking for a needle in a haystack... — Realist2 01:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to take care of it myself I think, I believe it's all sorted. Thank you. — Realist2 16:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help...

Firstly, someone has vandalized the Kurt Angle page, the 2003-2004 section has been deleted...

Secondly, Wikipedia has sent me this message, "Replaceable fair use Image:November_4_2004_WWE_Smackdown_Daniel_Puder_Kurt_Angle.jpg" can you help me with this, thanks... Gregorynovella (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Featured content news
Good content news
Reviews and additional project information
Professional wrestling article stats
Professional wrestling
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 3 6 9
FL 12 10 22
GA 6 30 62 98
B 1 16 64 207 288
C 1 14 99 114
Start 2 54 227 1764 2047
Stub 1 24 569 594
List 3 23 595 621
Future 3 14 17
Assessed 3 81 397 3312 3793
Total 3 81 397 3312 3793
Member updates
Recent deletion debates
Recent wrestling news
This fortnight in wrestling history
Contributors to this issue

DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 11:16, 23 November 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

RE: No Mercy

I rewrote the whole event section, which is where I saw a lot of the problem. The Background section is thoroughly referenced and the aftermath section looks good. I think it's good for a review - I'll pass it along to the reviewer. Cheers, DoomsDay 20:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) That's my first PW barnstar and one of my first in some time. It's greatly appreciated, and it's always nice to have someone recognize me. Cheers, DoomsDay 23:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done for getting NM '07 to GA, btw. :-) ScarianCall me Pat! 22:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retiring

Just thought you'd like to know that I've given you a mention here. You have been a pleasure to work with in the past year - I hope more GA diva articles keep coming your way. Sincerly, D.M.N. (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check User

User:JayExperience and User:JayLethal2008, seems like socks to me.--TruCo 23:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need actually proof, and to file a Checkuser. Nikki is an admin, not a checkuser - so there is nothing she can do without actual proof. iMatthew 23:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
iMatt is correct. Nikki311 22:43, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve this.

The Working Woman's Barnstar
I award you with this barnstar because you continue to work hard and improve articles most people have forgotten about. The cleanup list is becoming smaller and smaller as a result of you dedication. You deserve this.WillC 21:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Thank you!!! Nikki311 22:43, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I'd give you a barnstar, but I've not gotten on (for article work) in years, so I haven't given one out in years. iMatthew 22:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Debra

Hey, I made this video on youtube http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pAs0rQbFEfY its pictures taken from the movie "Gathering of hereos" that features Debra. She looks good for her age (*) - this is for your hard work lol x x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.103.96 (talk) 03:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Talk:Vince's Devils/GA1 iMatthew 01:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do you mind giving some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/WrestleMania XXIV? iMatthew 00:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I probably won't be able to until Thursday or Friday, but I definitely will then. Nikki311 02:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, although I should be studying right now!! Nikki311 03:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, thanks though. I finished with some comments. ayematthew 20:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Mercy

Sorry, I got distracted and forgot to note the talk page. The photo caption of Triple H says he won the championship from Orton but the article says that Orton won it from Triple H. Otto4711 (talk) 01:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chyna

The "sleeping jawbreaker" that's listed on her Online World of Wrestling profile actually is the sleeper slam. Another incorrect name that popped up for the move is the "rear naked choke drop" and that was on Chyna's Wiki profile before my most recent edit to her article. In addition, she always used a release powerbomb / Jackkife Powerbomb as her finisher, not the typical powerbomb that ends in a direct pinfall. PCE (Talk)

Copyedit?

If you have time, since I know you are really tied up with things, may you copyedit the prose of List of ECW Television Champions and List of WWF Light Heavyweight Champions? Thanks Nikki.--SRX 22:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Thats fine, I got time :). I added my input to it, good work btw.--SRX 22:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
ECW is  Done. I'll do the other tomorrow. Nikki311 03:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much, and I also responded to your comments that you left at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ECW Television Champions, care to take another look?--SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Awesome. Plus, the article looks gr8 now, I left a message at the GA review page, so I'm pretty sure it should pass now.--SRX 23:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing any 30 Rock related GANs. Now, there is something else you can do, but it only really requires one word. ;) Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 04:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Can you move Dale Hey to Buddy Roberts per here? Needs an admin move. RandySavageFTW (talk) 03:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Nikki311 18:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primo and Carlito

they should have a page because they are a current tag team and they have a long history together --Dmanskater<sup>""11""</sup> (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Featured content news
Good content news
Reviews and additional project information
Editing tips

This is a new section in the newsletter to help familiarize project members with the Manual of Style, which should help them in editing not only professional wrestling articles, but all articles in general.

  1. Avoid using bolding to emphasize text. See MOS:BOLD for appropriate uses of bold text.
  2. If you do not want your information removed from articles, please use proper grammar and cite your sources.
  3. Please avoid adding rumors to articles. Most rumors cannot be sourced with a reliable source and go against the Biographies of Living Persons policy.
  4. Avoid jargon such as face/babayface, heel, turn, etc. in articles. People unfamiliar with professional wrestling will not understand what these words mean. See WP:JARGON for more information.
Professional wrestling article stats
Professional wrestling
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 3 6 9
FL 12 10 22
GA 6 31 65 102
B 1 16 66 205 288
C 2 15 98 115
Start 2 54 229 1768 2053
Stub 1 24 560 585
List 3 24 602 629
Future 2 14 16
Assessed 3 82 406 3328 3819
Total 3 82 406 3328 3819
Member updates
Recent deletion debates
Recent wrestling news
This fortnight in wrestling history
Contributors to this issue

DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 17:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Hard Justice

Yeah sure. Just let me do a big copyedit before you start the review. I don't really care who reviews my stuff. It could be someone from WP:PW or could be someone very distant from wrestling. It doesn't matter to me. Plus about reviewing a TNA article, you might as well just watch the event. I know where most the events are online. The Last Man Standing match was awesome.--WillC 23:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, here is a link, but you might have to sign up. It cost nothing and is worth making an account. I enojoy it. here.--WillC 02:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, maybe you can take care of this: Priceless (WWE Tag Team). Maybe make a redirect and protect it until a consensus is reached because this guy is just going to keep removing the redirect and working on it in universe.--WillC 22:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry it is taking me a while, but real life is throwing everything at me. I guess God is testing me or something. I'm working on Hard Justice now, I'll be done tonight so you can read it tomorrow.--WillC 02:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I got Hard Justice done. Well I only have the aftermath and Reception sections left and they can take me about a minute or two. Also, the Last Man Standing match is long mainly because some cool and dangerous stuff happened in the match. Mainly around every pinfall. If you want, I'll cut it down to the last pinfall only. Just read it first before making your decision. If you watched the match you'll know why I wanted to keep alot of it. Well I hope it reads well. Also, hey you mind if I add you on myspace? I tend to add everyone I know anymore.WillC 14:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The entire article is finished now. I copy edited the aftermath and reception sections earlier.WillC 23:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll get right on them. I had to do a copyedit because I left alot of non-notable ifo in there and needed to change a few setences to make more sense. I'm glad I did, I had a few things wrong in the background. Okay, I'll do that. You don't look like I would expect you too, but no one ever does. Like I don't look like you probably think I do.WillC 00:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Considering you are an admin. Can you place a note next to Curry Man on the TNA Roster page that says he is currently inactive due to being fired in the storyline or something along those lines. The pages is currently protected for three months due to edit warrs.WillC 03:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All comments are fixed and I left some of my own. I'll work on the Main event match to make it follow and try to cut some of the stuff out.WillC 00:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I worked on the main match a bit.--WillC 03:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for passing it.--WillC 03:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter

Since you came up with the idea, can you update the Editing tips in the current WP:PW newsletter? I'm really not sure what to put in it myself.--SRX 23:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Mickie James

Uh... hi, I don't really want to cause an argument or anything so can you take this a good way? I support that week by week thing but Mickie kissing Khali is important, it could become a major storyline! Thanks. PS. can you contact me on my talk page cos my memory's real bad. The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 21:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yah you're right, but if it does I'll keep the thing I added in a section on my user page. The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I'd like to make an article on WWE stable "The Legacy" but cos I'm not very god at all and it would go for deleting, could either you try and do it or propose it at the wikipedia proffesional wwrestling project thing? I tried it but couldn't do it because I don't know how to. Cheers! The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 22:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but now it's an official stable an article should be made. How do you propose it? I'll add it on my things to remember list! Cheers. The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

I appreciate the fact that you're seriosuly busy, but could you please move Joseph James Jr. to Joseph James, Jr.? There should be a comma after "James", but I can't move the page since the target page exists as a redirect, so I'm surmising that it needs an admin to do it. Thanks, ♥NiciVampireHeart09:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Nikki311 01:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! ♥NiciVampireHeart05:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, do you think you can protect Genesis (2009)? Alot of ips adding spoilers.--WillC 02:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! Didn't see this, but it has been protected by someone else. Nikki311 23:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nikki. I just thought I'd let you know that I have nominated the Hardy Boyz as a Good Topic, using two articles on which you are listed as the main contributor per the page history statistics tool, Amy Dumas and Matt Hardy. ♥NiciVampireHeart17:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Legacy

I think the legacy is now the main part of raw, it's rising quickly, and if an article isn't made now, we're going to be left behind. Kalajan 22:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have the right to be answered. Kalajan 22:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I may take a while. Kalajan 21:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this okay? User:Kalajan/(The Legacy). Kalajan 23:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I've made the article. User:Kalajan/(The Legacy). Kalajan 14:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've done the trick, I'm going to get a new exclusive photo of them next month - I think the guy's called Mshake. What do you think? Kalajan 01:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nikki are you there?  Kalajan  18:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sock of user that wasn't blocked

User:Seegers6189 was supposed to be blocked last week as he's a sock puppet. But he wasn't and he's still editing can you block him for me? Also I'm going to see if there's more. SteelersFan-94 23:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki, it's being taken care of. A checkuser is running a case for me, and this thread was not necessary.ayematthew 23:43, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks. Nikki311 23:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, thanks! ayematthew 23:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was being sarcastic. SteelersFan-94 00:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then please stop, and read WP:CIVIL. ayematthew 00:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You don't have to link article's Matt, that's an insult to me that you think I wouldn't know that. And You go in and say "O this user's question doesn't matter since I got a check user going, no he can't ask an admins view on this,I have to own this case, and anybody else who say's anything about it will be put down and told that a thread that they put on here should be deleted, even though they just have a concern for the well being of this site". SteelersFan-94 00:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop fighting on my talk page. The orange "you have comments" message is driving me crazy. :) Nikki311 00:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Surrender

The comments have been addressed. Thanks for reviewing it. I was not expecting it to get reviewed until after the new year or before Slammiversary.--WillC 03:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Featured content news
Good content news
Reviews and additional project information
Editing tips

This is a new section in the newsletter to help familiarize project members with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. There is a new consensus to remove notes such as most reigns, first reign, last reign, etc. in the championships and accomplishments section. See here for more information.
  2. Our project has a cleanup listing. Please help by adding sources or expanding any articles listed here.
  3. The television show RAW should now be written as Raw per WP:MOSCAPS.
  4. Please familiarize yourself with the general notability policy of Wikipedia. Avoid creating new articles that do not satisfy the requirements.
  5. If a sentence seems like it may not be true or is partially controversial, remove it or add {{fact}} directly after it.
Professional wrestling article stats
Professional wrestling
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 3 6 9
FL 12 11 23
GA 6 33 71 110
B 1 16 65 200 282
C 2 15 98 115
Start 2 54 227 1789 2072
Stub 1 25 580 606
List 3 23 601 627
Future 2 13 15
Assessed 3 82 405 3369 3859
Total 3 82 405 3369 3859
Member updates
Recent deletion debates
Recent wrestling news
This fortnight in wrestling history
Contributors to this issue

Enjoy the final 2008 issue of the WP:PW newsletter and have a very happy holiday season, from WP:PW!


DiscussionSuggestionsFeedback

Delivered: 10:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

I know its the holiday season, so I'm not expecting a quick reply, but when you have time, may you copyedit the above article? Thanks. Happy Holidays.--SRX 18:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

 Done Nikki311 02:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Thank you for taking the time to complete the GA Review of the White Stag Leadership Development Program article. Please see my reply. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 22:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Nikki311 02:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Have a great holiday, Nikki. Good job again on the No Mercy article. Have a wonderful New Year too! :-) Keep those great articles coming! ScarianCall me Pat! 15:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Nikki311 02:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need Help

I'm relatively new to wiki but feel I have alot to add to the community. I'm currently in dispute with another contributor on here and have tried to resolve it but not having much luck. It seems that he has an issue with a certain profile and no matter what i do to try and improve it he goes in and erases it. I've tried talking to him several times about it and asked his advice on what he would like, however everytime i make changes based on his suggestions he goes in and erases it immediately.

The proile page is for RJ Williams and it has been on wiki for a number of years and has several different contributions to it. i only made 1 minor edit a few months ago and i was going to it a few days ago to add a new fact and saw this user questioned the notabilty of the profile and altered several things on it.

When i asked why he was questioning the notability he first accused me of being associated with the profile in question---when i pointed out i had only made 1 minor edit and all my work was on other profiles he said he made a mistake and confused me with someone else. and the 2nd time i questioned something he went in and said he accidently put the wrong citation.

I dug a little deeper and he asked another admin to delete a user name associated with the bio and the admin was very reluctant but finally did. It's just very odd why he is so focused on this one wiki entry.

It seems to me that this user has a personal issue with the bio in question because he has gone in and deleted everything associated with it and this person's companies. At first i thought nothing of it but after taking time trying to make it better im really questionable of his initiatives. Just frustrating because i spent hours trying to improve it and he immediately erases it.

There are many details which i can share on why his behavior is suspicious but i know your time is valuable so i wont get into it here. Perhaps you could review all the postings on his talk page? Its toward the bottom and the profile in question is RJ Williams here is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hello_Control

i would love your advice on how to handle--at this point its not about my changes being added to the page i've given up on trying to make more---its about someone using wiki to try and disparage someone they may have a personal grief with.

On a side not good to see you have so much insight on WWE--im a fan myself--look forward to reading some of your posts.

(Movieman2008 (talk) 02:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Happy new year!

(See above!)  Kalajan  01:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

The Legacy

I think I'm done, its long and good, and when User:Mshake3 gets me a photo it'll be even better.  Kalajan  16:17, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for getting back to me. Moonriddengirl has been very helpful. So I think I'm covered, but thank you again for taking the time to acknowlege my question. Enjoy the rest of your trip! (Movieman2008 (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)).[reply]