User talk:Interiot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 212.201.71.68 (talk) at 19:21, 3 October 2009 (→‎Opt in). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Definition of Tool1, Tool2, and Tool3

Template:Busy2

Some comments:

  • I didn't leave due to any conflicts or animosity. There were several reasons why I've drifted away, including the need to spend less time doing edits.
  • I still want to see Wikipedia grow and succeed, I still do ~25 anon edits a month, and I advocate for Wikipedia every chance I get.
  • Apologies for leaving the tools hanging, and not providing for a smoother transition. I haven't kept up with their status, but hopefully the tools can be transitioned to others who are interested in maintaining or enhancing them.
  • The email link still works. If anyone is updating any tool code, feel free to ask about clarifications about the code. For other questions, I've tended not to answer... apologies, but I'm not dedicating as much time to Wikipedia as I used to.

--Interiot (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're silly mate, heeh... I come around to say cheers to a bro from not too long ago and appears you've already gone to the large, ever-expanding WikiCloud in the sky! 67.142.130.26 (talk) 07:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your internal tool Tool3 AKA count_edits

Hi. Thanks for all your contributions to Wikimedia projects, and good luck with your new interest(s). You (and others reading this message) may be interested in JIRA issue EDITCOUNTER-13.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In case you can't access that ticket, please see the error message here generated from here. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Epic Pinball.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Epic Pinball.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doom Level.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom Level.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OneWeekSingle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OneWeekSingle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MrEd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MrEd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ParsleySage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ParsleySage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Johnnie Walker.logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnnie Walker.logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wannabe Kate

About wannabe kate: If I understand correctly, the script will query a wiki found at the location of (input)+"/w/" - Right? This makes it impossible (i think) to query wikis who do not have a /w/ location, but rather have it in a different folder or in the root directory (such as, in my case, [www.wowwiki.com]). Was the tool never intended to be able to interact with anything besides wikipedia, is there a way to do it and i was unable to figure it out, or is there a way you could implement it? Thanks in any case. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Interiot -- I wondered whether "Wannabe Kate" was a reference to Ben Folds Five -- and sure enough, you added a link to the song on the Kate page :-) The article for the song was never written, and someone's removed the link in the meantime -- oh well, time to hand out the Baghavad Gitas... Joriki (talk) 19:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SoundOfMusic soundtrack.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SoundOfMusic soundtrack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man

I'm really glad to see you back. I shared with a couple of trusted friends my concern that you, erm, how shall I put this, might have left more than just Wikipedia, if you catch my drift. (mostly because one of your last edit summaries promised to do something that evening, which seemed so ominous when unfulfilled!) While I'm blushing furiously, I've rarely been so pleased to be wrong. Welcome back! Cheers --Dweller (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hello, I'm w:es:Libertad y Saber. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Can you help me, please? Thanks :) Libertad y Saber (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see you are alive and well

After you abruptly disappeared, there was speculation that you were no longer amongst the living. You have friends/fans here who were genuinely worried.

Welcome back!

The Transhumanist 23:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Red Alert level.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Red Alert level.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ssbbrawl3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ssbbrawl3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sprint2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sprint2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sunbeam logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunbeam logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OptIn broken

The OptIn is broken, it gives this error: 

Unable to connect to database: Unknown MySQL server host '-p.db.ts.wikimedia.org' (1) at
 /home/interiot/public_html/perllib/ZedlerUtils.pm line 50.

--Thinboy00 @663, i.e. 14:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Bump :( Q T C 09:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tool 3 broken?

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_edit_counters#Interiot_Tool_3_now_broken.3F.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mr Coffee logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mr Coffee logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ASE certified.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ASE certified.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Long captions

A tag has been placed on Template:Long captions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editcout delay

Hi Interiot. First of all, thank you for your useful tools, specially the edicount. I'm quite sure you already know, but the data for es.wikipedia ara old, as if the database has a delay. In fact, in my case shows data from January. Hope you can fix the problem. Greetings, Lucien leGrey


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bacon robots.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bacon robots.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elebits.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elebits.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two things

One: Betacommandbot sucks.

Two: Your tool chokes when an account has too many edits. I tried it with Betacommandbot and it terminated the query due to too many pages. I guess you know this already, as it's part of the design. Enigma (talk) 21:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GranTrak10 screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GranTrak10 screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KeeGames.png

Thanks for uploading Image:KeeGames.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Golden Horn Labelled Map

A tag has been placed on Template:Golden Horn Labelled Map requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hello, I'm w:pl:Wikipedysta:Klejas. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Can you help me, please? Thanks :) Klejas (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for editcount script

Dear Interiot,

Just thought: isn't the number of bytes a user contributes (or deletes) relevant for the editcount script? User may delete: negative diff of article file size, or contribute new material: positive diff of file sizes. Thanks for your attention, 80.60.203.201 (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC) (user Hansmuller Dutch wikipedia, not elsewhere)[reply]

Wikimedia edit counter

Something's wrong with the graph machine on your edit counter: http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=durzatwink&dbname=enwiki_p. That is an example. If one clicks the gray square that says "OPT IN", it says that there is an SQL error 403. Can you fix it? contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994TALK 02:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC) (answer at my talk page)[reply]

Are you retired?

You haven't been around Wikipedia since December 2007 (Christmas). I was also wondering if you were retired from Wikipedia now because of this long absence. Hope to see you soon again editing. contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994TALK 19:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MonsterGarage.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MonsterGarage.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Futuresport-DVDcoverart.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Futuresport-DVDcoverart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

opt in

Can you make a opt in function for me in your editcounter? the user is: nl:gebruiker:Sterkebak Thnks Sterkebak (talk) 11:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NOVA logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:NOVA logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counter

Hey, whenever you see this, could you please opt-me out of your wannabe_kate counter script on the Toolserver? I'm fining myself checking my counter more often then I'd like, a bad case of editcountitis some might say. Cheers. +Hexagon1 (t) 22:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counter opt-in

Hi Interiot, first, I found an error (trying to conenct to data base server "-p.something", when trying to opt in for my bot ":user:Purbo T", and second, since it's a bot active on all wikipedias, not deserving any privacy at all ;-) , and I am its bot master, I'd like to mass-opt-in Purbo T for all wikis for anything one coud ask about it. How can I do that, or does it suffice, to tell you here? Thanx, including for your edit counter, and everything good you're doing. -- ksh:User:Purodha aka Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The error message is: Unable to connect to database: Unknown MySQL server host '-p.db.ts.wikimedia.org' (1) at /home/interiot/public_html/perllib/ZedlerUtils.pm line 50. [[::User:Chenzw|Chenzw]] ([[::User talk:Chenzw|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Chenzw|contribs]]) 02:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Opt-in

Hello, I'm id:Pengguna:Fjr ab. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Can you help me, please? Thanks Regards Fjr ab 11:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tank (arcade game).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tank (arcade game).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edit counter edits/day

avg edits per days seem to be wrong. I have 4.500 Edits on ~1260 days but [1] tells me that I have .33 edits per day. --Trublu (talk) 10:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I second that. Take for example User:Tm93 - user for less than 2 months - 582 edits. I make that about 10 edits per day. You do have to look at when the user started! — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jaan

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jaan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaan. Thank you.
--Jerzy•t 17:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My wishlist

Hello Interiot, I note you have retired yet some folks have had contact. I wanted a tool that ranked articles in terms of my mainspace edits to them - the top 15 mainspace edits are listed in the Wannabe Kate tool, but as I have nearly 30k edits and many articles, I like to keep track of articles I may have edited alot in a desire to get them to a semi-stable point of GA or FA status. If you are unable to make a tool like this can you let me know who could? I am sure Dweller and Awadewit among others would like it too :)

Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(I might post this by email too)

My edit count.

Hello. The edit counting chart is a great thing, but I have n issue to address. It's probably minor, but I know I can't fix it. Yesterday, I created a template for the band Vintersorg. This is that template. I have donated three edits to that template, but the edit counting chart is only acknowledging two of the edits. Is there anything that you can do about that? Thanks. BTC 19:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your tool

This one, specifically. I don't understand the average edits per day. The number doesn't make sense even if the first day was when Wikipedia started. The counter claims that I only have made 0.61 edits/day. In reality, the number is much, much higher. Enigma message Review 01:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NOVA logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NOVA logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tool1/WannabeKate

I have been playing with your tool, for example here and sometimes I notice that it seems to be possibly "confused" and divide the edits of a page into two, the page and its archive. For example, in this case with KillerChihuahua, her 2nd and 3rd most heavily edited article talk pages are:

  • 245 Intelligent design
  • 241 Intelligent design/Archive 23

Does that mean she has a total of 486 talk page edits on Intelligent design? Or what? Thanks.--Filll (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles Started Tool

I just whipped up a PHP script on my local MediaWiki site to show articles started by a user, and was just wishing I could run it on the Wikimedia servers... In the course of poking around I saw your tool, but noticed that it's only done by request. Does it take a long time to run? (It's nice and snappy on mine, but my database is about 10MB and cached in RAM...) In any case, would you be so kind as to run a report for my username when you get a chance? No sense in me duplicating your efforts and trying to sign up for the toolserver. Fogster (talk) 18:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broken tool: articles_created

I would like the articles created done with my account please. thank you. Inclusionist (talk) 06:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in me, pls

Hello, i'm Zac Allan from Russian wiki. I'm agree to open again (after my rename). Open meplease (if russian administration didn't do so before you ^)). Thanks! - Zac Allan (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Counter tool

According to this I have 3.01 edits/day and over 40,000 edits which would mean I had been editing wikipedia for well over 30 years. The figure may be out to the power of ten )as I have been editing somewhat over 3 years with this account, though that is just a guess. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned this a few sections up. :) Enigma message 03:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

45000 Limit

Your edit count tool is terminating with my most recent 45000 edits. Is there anything that can be done to get a complete summary of my contributions?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please respond at my talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in (User edit counter)

Hello Interiot,

Although I was opt in in the past when I was user Jeroenvrp on the Dutch Wikipedia, now after my account is renamed to Jeroen, I have to opt in again. When I click on the "Opt in"-image I get the following error for a while now:

Unable to connect to database: Unknown MySQL server host '-p.db.ts.wikimedia.org' (1) at /home/interiot/public_html/perllib/ZedlerUtils.pm line 50.

Can you also opt-in me manually?

Cheers,

--Jeroenvrp (talk) 20:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:JohnConnor.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JohnConnor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

Hello, I'm Chinese Wikipedia User zh:User:Altt311. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Please open me for the functions, Thanks! --Altt311 (talk) 02:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bedtime Story single.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bedtime Story single.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in request

I'd like to opt-in for the edit counter graphs and such. Thanks! ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bejeweled.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Bejeweled.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your WannabeKate tool is broken

I have used it many a time and it's a fine tool. I always put in, Navnløs, and it shows me all my edits. However, I did it just now a few times and it shows me as having 0 edits when I have well over 3000. Just thought I'd let you know. Thanks. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 22:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tool worked in past

what is going on, I am working on hr.wiki and My count is same for a while. --Billy the lid (talk) 11:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC) (user:Armchoir on hr.wiki)[reply]

Contradiction

My contribution in id.wiktionary and this one is different MuhammadAzmi 12:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wannabe_kate tool request

counter tool --- Seeing as it's not already implemented, I suspect this is a rather great undertaking... but I just wanted to try asking, anyway: do you have any plans to include the same features with other-language Wikipedias (or of more interest to me: Commons) as you do with the English Wikipedia outputs? I'd just be curious to see my stats on Commons (my primary account). Cheers! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 05:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hello, I'm w:pl:Wikipedysta:Nooldorka. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Can you help me, please? Thanks :) Nooldorka (User talk:Nooldorka)

Possible error in a tool

Hello Interiot,

first of all: thank you for programming all that well used tools for the community. Some of them are used by me often, and some are inofficial part of the official structures of the german WP, that I belong to. E.g. your editcount tool, that is very helpful during admin elections etc.

This editcount tool seems to have a little damage: it looks as if the parameter "Avg edits/day" shows wrong results. They are a bit to small, as it seems. Could you please check it out?

Kind regards, Carol.Christiansen (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I always wondering how can we get the "Avg edits/day"??? Its away to small. Could you please explain? Thank you. -- Erdinal (talk) 23:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Opt In

Hello, I'm w:es:Usuario:Digary. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Can you help me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Digary (talk • contribs) 23:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to reach toolserver

Hi Interiot! I'm not sure you can help me with this, but I just don't know whom to ask. I recently installed Opera and can't seem to reach any tools.wikimedia.de-based websites (404 error). Apparently, other users with Opera can reach these pages just fine, and other browsers on my PC (IE/Maxthon and FF) can as well. I asked on the Opera forums, but no one replied to me for a long time. Do you have any idea what's going on? Thanks, Ynhockey (Talk) 19:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'd like to opt-in to the monthly graphs for commonswiki_p. Thanks! -- Ynhockey (Talk) 08:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hello! I'm ro:User:Firilacroco and I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Could you please enable this function to my user? Thank you in advance! --Firilăcroco mesage 10:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm fr:User:Alter005 and I have the same demand as Firilacroco: I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Would you be so kind to enable this function to my user? I inform you that I have hidden the edit counter in my user page fr:Utilisateur:Alter005/liens utiles+outils‎ Many thanks in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.207.64.229 (talk) 09:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User contribs

I was wondering if you can merge User:Annoyomous24 with User: K. Annoyomous24 since I recently changed my English Wikipedia name. Thanks. –– K. Annoyomous24 07:54, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in

Hi there. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms, and would like to opt in. Thanks. tj9991 (talk | contribs) 09:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in 2

Hello, I'm w:it:Utente:Iaga (and w:it:Utente:IagaBot). I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms (me and my bot). Can you help me, please? Thanks :D --Iaga (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in 3

Hello, I am w:en:User:Venske and w:ro:Utilizator:Venske. Here I confirm that I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms and I would like to opt in. Thank you. Venske (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution tree broken?

The Contribution Tree does not work anymore. Is this an error or did you close this tool? --Hurlbrink (talk) 12:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new task force - ESA

Hello,

I've noticed that you are active in the area of space exploration. I just wanted to let you know that a European Space Agency task force has been set up to improve the presently very poor condition of articles about ESA and related topics. If you are interested, please join the task force here. We sure could use your help. Thanks.U5K0 (talk) 11:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you shed some light on this

creation by you: 

MfD nomination of Image:Scotch regions.svg/labelled

Image:Scotch regions.svg/labelled, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Image:Scotch regions.svg/labelled. FrankB 19:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This tool is Broken

You can check out....A MYSQL DB error.....E Renault Talk + 15:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counter suggestion

Could include Crat actions, such as renames etc, either split up or amalgamated. Then again, it works fine as it is... :-) --Dweller (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Movietome.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Movietome.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Fire sign.png

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Fire sign.png, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Fire sign.png is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Fire sign.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Edit counting in de:wp

Obviously no actual edits in the German Wikipedia have been counted since yesterday's 4-hour-breakdown. DTIY --Wahrerwattwurm (talk) 10:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

The problem is solved by now. Thanks from --Wahrerwattwurm (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in

I changed my username on the French Wikipédia some time ago (my userpage), and I saw I can't opt-in anymore : [2]. Could you please manually opt me in again ? Thanks... Vol de nuit (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you need that information my previous name on WP:fr was Sam Spade. Vol de nuit (talk) 17:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

I would Like to opt in to the extra features on tool 3 hda3ku (talk) 01:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bug for italian wikipedia

Hi! I would like to refer a bug of this editcounter: I know, in that page is written to use JIRA to refer bugs, but in that site I couldn't find the way to do it. So this is the problem: last week it.wikipedia.org was transfered to another server of WMF; editcounter now cannot find our project, so for it.wiki it doesn't work. Can you help us, please? Only to update. Thanks! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 10:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in

Hi, I am tr:Kullanıcı:Vikiçizer and en:User:Vikiçizer. Here I confirm that I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms and I would like to opt in. And I think there's a problem edit-count, it doesn't workin', help me... Thank you...Vikipedist (talk) 21:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counter stopped counting

Apparently there is something wrong with my edit counter. Since about a week it doesn't count my edits any longer. I am active on the Dutch and English wikipedia and on wikimedia commons. Can anybody solve this problem? Thanks in advance!--Piet.Wijker (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suddenly, out of the blue so it seemed, my edit counter has started counting again. I don't know who is responsible for this, but thanks all the same.--Piet.Wijker (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your counter in the Wikipedia user interface

Hi Interiot. In case you still read your talk page sometimes:

We are now using your counter in the Wikipedia user interface. It is in the box at the bottom of all logged in user's contributions pages.

Now we have a concern: The counter is set to default not render the two upper graphs. We want to know if that is on purpose to save tool server load? We would like to know that before we add the parameter to make those images render. Since the link in that contributions page box perhaps causes many thousands of requests a day to your counter. So I wonder: Is it okay that we add the parameter to the URL in that box or not?

Here is our discussion about this at the talk page of that contributions page box: MediaWiki talk:Sp-contributions-footer#Add &showgraphs=2d to interiot. I'd love if you could respond over there.

--David Göthberg (talk) 23:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sunkus Logo Derivation.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunkus Logo Derivation.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TBCR commercial.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TBCR commercial.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"What links here" function

I am interested in "what links here" feature of wiki. But it seems that we can only check the latest information of the backlinks to one article. Can we get the historical information of it like the revision history of main articles and talk pages? --yuzhong 05:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counter counting backwards!

All of a sudden my edit counter has started counting backwards. What seems to be the problem this time? Can anybody explain? Thank you in advance.--Piet.Wijker (talk) 15:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page is a big help. It really is!--Piet.Wijker (talk) 10:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should take a look at the beginning of this page (...don't answer) --Xario (talk) 19:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1500 of my edits have vanished

My edit counter seems to have lost about 1500 of my edits in the last day or so. Yesterday when I checked I had over 8300. Today I have 6828 (6829 with this message). I've checked through my edit history and the edits still seem to be around. Any idea what's happening? TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I may be wrong but I think that edits to the "Image" namespace, now renamed "File", are not being included (probably due to the rename). Guest9999 (talk) 11:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
One thing that is missing are the 170 edits I made to List of Big Brother 2008 housemates (UK). TheRetroGuy (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wannabe_kate query

Dear Interiot, According to my user profile, I have made 1906 edits on English Wikipedia, but according to wannabe_kate, it is only 1806. Please can you explain the discrepancy? Thanks—GRM (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tool1 appears to be malfunctioning

I just went to check my edit count with Tool1, and it put it down to 5403 for some reason. Special:Preferences says my edit count is in the 7000s, as have past counts with Tool1. The missing edits appear to be varied, as all of my month totals looked like they were down, even older ones. --TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with the edit counter

Days ago, Tool1 reported me passing the 8000th edit line, but now it says I have 7871 edits. I've checked Special:Contributions/Admiral Norton and I have more than 8000. The Tool3 also corroborates that. I'd like you to look into this. Admiral Norton (talk) 12:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have a similar problem Tool1 says I have 1962 edits, but I do have about 2900 (including >600 at group (mathematics), which are completely lost in the counter). Jakob.scholbach (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I, too am having the problem with Tool1. I did have over 5,000 edits last week, and now have only about 4,500, with dozens of edit being removed from the 12/2007 and 1/2008 months. Tool3, however, seems to show my correct number of edits. Timmeh! 17:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same here - this seems to be a problem with Tool1 no longer counting "File" or "Image" (the depreciated type) edits. - AKeen (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I compared tool1 and tool3's counts of my "mainspace" edits, and tool1 shows 700 less than tool3. For me, it deleted mostly mainspace edits; I haven't made many image or file edits. Timmeh! 02:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, Imitation Kate is broken. For those concerned, this tool is similar and works, though it only shows top user talk and top mainspace edits. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a parser problem, as far as I can tell. For me, the articles which stopped being counted were articles with brackets in their name. Hopefully it's fixed soon! -- Ynhockey (Talk) 03:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Empty Line in tool1

Ran tool1 on myself today, and noticed that my second most frequently edited page was a blank line- but I have 80 edits there. The HTML generated is: 

<table class=topN><tr><th colspan=2>Mainspace
<tr><td>93<td><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buddhism_and_Hinduism&action=history'>Buddhism and Hinduism</a>
<tr><td>80<td><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=history'></a>
<tr><td>73<td><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buddhism&action=history'>Buddhism</a>

The table tag is closed properly further down, but the rows and columns have open tags but no closing tags. --Clay Collier (talk) 06:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counter

Hi, for some reason the edit counter (http://toolserver.org/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Qllach&dbname=cawiki_p) seems to have stopped at the end of 2008, I can't see my edits in January 2009. Thanks for checking it.--Qllach (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I find that my total edit count is decreasing month by month. On Feb 2, 2009, it is 21231. Back on January 2, 2009, it was 22789. The articles I edited in January 2009 have certainly not all been deleted, since the tool presently credits me with several hundred edits in January 2009. What is going on? Was it wrong on Jan 2 or is it wrong now? Has it been infected with the software used to count votes on electronic voting machines in some U.S. states? If a Wikipedia user does several hundred edits a month, the total should NOT DECREASE! Thanks. Edison (talk) 02:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The same question for me (http://toolserver.org/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?dbname=idwiki_p&user=Meursault2004) for my edits on Javanese Wikipedia. Meursault2004 (talk) 09:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I miss the edit counter :( – Alensha talk 22:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"count" tool: one article left blank

  • Hey I just ran your (awesome!) "count tool twice, and both times one article was left unnamed even though it had 195 edits. Any idea what's up with that? Tks Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 02:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had the same problem. Exactly one article (and apparently, always the same article) has its name blank. --Enric Naval (talk) 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:PopulousII.gif

Thanks for uploading File:PopulousII.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why my editcounter doesn't show any graph?

The question is not so clear. I don't understand the difference between opting in and opting out. What I know is that I'd like to see graphs in my editcounter. What should I do? I already made this modification to my user talk page.

And now? --Zabob (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC) (also known as it:User:Tener)[reply]

TStoc

Hi, I've added all my tools to TStoc (putting me at the top of your tool count by a wide margin ;-) and I'd like to mention a few issues with your (otherwise splendid) tool:

  • The List of tools not yet registered shows my CommonsHelper, even though it has been on TSoc for quite a while. Maybe you're not checking for URLs without the server name? I've added the "short form" URL as also-url for all my tools, and hope that it will solve the problem (currently it doesn't, but maybe it's a cache issue)
  • Your tags appear to be case-sensitive. I suggest to make them lowercase, so there won't be tools with "Commons" and others with "commons"
  • Clicking on the PMID tag, I get "No tools matched that criteria". However, there is a tool by Holek that has the PMID tag.

So much for complaining ;-) --Magnus Manske (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opt-in

Hi there, I'm w:de:Benutzer:Markus. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Can you help me, please? Thanks and best regards, --Markus.Sprima (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wannabe_kate now gives 0 edits

It says "number of unique pages 0", as if I had made 0 edits on wikipedia --Enric Naval (talk) 02:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be working...Modernist (talk) 12:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thirded :p ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 16:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Forth'ed :) fr33kman -s- 18:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5 - gives me zero edits, too. someone broke it? use the soxred93 implementation.--AndersW (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, this tool is working and seems to provide almost identical functionality (monthly graphs, namespace statistics etc.) ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 18:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sixthed. And for about a month before that, it didn't display any pages with parentheses in their titles. Tezkag72私にどなる私のはかい 15:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You can also try WikiChecker. Admiral Norton (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems

I'm using Mozilla Firefox, and when I go to edit count, it doesn't even display any bars. The "earliest" is blank, and the number of unique pages is 0. [ http://toolserver.org/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Marshall_Williams2&site=en.wikipedia.org Maybe looking here will help.] This problem didn't come up before. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 01:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I get the same thing. Been working correctly for years, just noticed it today. Truthanado (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just checked it now using Safari and ended with a null report, but it was working fine recently! CZmarlin (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, now when I click on "edit count", it goes to the other edit counter "machine" that I put on my user page as a hyperlink. Did you get rid of yours or something and make the "edit count" redirect to the other one? This is what I am talking about. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 00:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I get the same result in both Firefox 3 and IE 6. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, me too. It hasn't been working for me for the past few days. Just a zero. Valley2city‽ 22:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same here. -- Alexf(talk) 22:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same. -- TKGD2007|TALK 17:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto. Ζρς ιβ' ¡hábleme! 02:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Until it's fixed, I'd advise using Tool3 instead, which has almost identical functionality. haz (talk) 17:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You guys

I think Interiot is busy with other stuff right now as he hasnt edited Wikipedia (under this name, at least) since late 2007. Soap Talk/Contributions 03:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Houston, I think we have a problem..." -Signaleer (talk) 13:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tool1/wannabe_kate broken

This tool has now completely ceased working. I have it go to this page and it displays no numbers and no graphs. I have seen that you have not logged on in over a year now, I just wanted to leave you this message. Maybe you or someone else can fix the tool. -PatPeter 21:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto, see [3]. Viewfinder (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it's urgent, you may email Interiot. --Mayfare (talk) 01:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using this tool now [[4]] which seems to work well. Mick gold (talk) 16:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cl vs AOA

Hi Interiot,

Your graph at Stall (flight)#Graph is not quite right. Lift does not drop as indicated although this is a common misconception. I've pointed it out on the talk page. Here is an actual graph:

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/airfoils/q0150b.shtml

Would you mind editing the graph you inserted to reflect actual data more closely? Thanks MarkC 09:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbcannell (talk • contribs)

Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

It doesn't work with my contributions. It always turn up blank. You may want to check into this. See: User:Tyw7/Contributions for the links. Thanks, --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 01:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm finding the same problem. Letdorf (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Me too! Dividing 19:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 12:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ditto.....--Buster7 (talk) 01:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ditto ~ UBeR (talk) 19:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not to harp, but ditto for me. It has not worked in months for me. :( I loved that tool! Ariel♥Gold 04:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not working for me. Sad, I loved the thing! -Oreo Priest talk 15:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Me neither. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 03:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

nice picture of turkey / hellespont

Opt in

Hi Interiot, I'm user on Turkish wikipedia and my user name is Hedda Gabler, I'd like to opt-in of the daily/weekly graphs on my User edit counter. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

Thanks, --Hedda Gabler (talk) 11:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hi Interiot, I'm user on Catalan wikipedia and my user name is Capgròs. I'd like to opt-in of the daily/weekly graphs on my User edit counter. I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

Thank you very much. ca:User:Capgròs --85.58.70.57 (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Statite us005183225-005.png

File:Statite us005183225-005.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Statite us005183225-005.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Statite us005183225-005.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hi, this is Sabbut mainly from the Spanish-language Wikipedia. I'd like to opt in the monthly graphs in your edit counter. Thanks. Sabbut (talk) 22:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect calculation?

Hi! I think that editcount is a great tool. However, there seems to be something strange in the calculation of average edits / day. I have made 15464 edits in 1584 days. That should give 9.77 average edits per day, but editcount reports 1.07 avg edits/day. Is this a bug or do I missunderstand something? My editcount page is at this link [5]. --Jorchr (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I mean the same, made 370 edits in 1118 days, gives 0.33 average edits per day, but editcount reports 0.03 Avg edits/day.--WinfriedSchneider (talk) 10:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hi, this is Kaisersoft mainly from the German-language Wikipedia. I'd like to opt in the monthly graphs in your edit counter. Thanks. --Kaisersoft (talk) 11:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hi, this is JCIV mainly from the German-language Wikipedia. I'd like to opt in the monthly graphs in your edit counter. Thanks. -- JCIV (talk) 09:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opt in

Hi, this is ELLinng mainly from the German-language Wikipedia. I'd like to opt in the monthly graphs in your edit counter. Thanks. --212.201.71.68 (talk) 19:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Interiot&oldid=317695811"