Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 73.96.115.3 (talk) at 03:22, 20 September 2016 (→‎User-reported). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Wikipedia:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.
    Shortcut

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 00:50 on 14 August 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    Warned user. There haven't been warnings given regarding "inappropriate page creation". I have gone ahead and done so. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. Based off of your message on the IP's talk page here. The edits aren't vandalism; the user just needs to be educated on BLP and when to cite reliable sources and why it's important. A discussion resolves this issue, not a block. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    As per User:2600:1000:b020:c4:ac0e:e8a1:f712:51c3's last edit summary: "Who gives a shit! No one cares!" -- so, I would ask, why bother? Quis separabit? 01:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) Page protection or a rangeblock would be better for this situation... 73.96.115.3 (talk) 02:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Page protected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&oldid=740279774"