Ramakrishna: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reverting to my version. not undue weight. let alone "absurdly undue weight". as you know, SRK's sexuality is a major topic in contemportary academic discussions.
Removed material added by a fanatic
Line 105: Line 105:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>



Ramakrishna had a highly eccentric, [[homoerotic]] [[sexuality]] which was related to his mystical realization.<ref><blockquote>Sil argues that Ramakrishna was too mixed-up, too uneducated, too erratic, too freakish, too sexually obsessed to have any serious claim to reverence as a spiritual leader.</blockquote>William Radice, Untitled review of ''Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa: A Psychological Profile'' by Narasingha P. Sil ''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies'', University of London, Vol. 58, No. 3, (1995), p. 590 Cambridge University Press on behalf of School of Oriental and African Studies [http://www.jstor.org/stable/620150]</ref><ref><blockquote>Kripal thanks Sil in his acknowledgements and agrees on p. 298 with his suggestion that Ramakrishna was sexually abused as a child and young adult...The saint's homosexual leanings and his horror of women as lovers should not be the issue: there was plenty of biographical evidence before the exposure of the ''guhya katha''...In his revulsion at the (heterosexual) Tantric practices that the Bhairavi, another of his mysterious preceptors, tried to impart to him, Ramakrishna was 'a failed Tantrika'; but in his erotic visions, his preaching of 'a mansion of fun that left the renouncing ways of Vedanta far behind', his homosexuality was an energizing force.</blockquote>William Radice, Untitled review of ''Kali's Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna'' by Jeffrey J. Kripal ''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies'', University of London, Vol. 61, No. 1. (1998), pp. 160-161. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0041-977X%281998%2961%3A1%3C160%3AKCTMAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U]</ref><ref><blockquote>In it, Jeffrey Kripal offers ample proof that Ramakrishna, the Bengali ecstatic who became the fountainhead of one of the most vigorous Hindu reform movements to emerge from nineteenth-century India, had a very significantly homosexual side...Yet Kripal does clearly establish the larger point: that Ramakrishna felt strong attractions for young men-"pure pots" of love, he called them-and that he associated these moods in a complex, persistent way with his mystical experience of Kali...But the book's satisfactions are many. One of the greatest is that Kripal not only reveals Ramakrishna's homoerotic secret, but turns that secret into a searching beacon.</blockquote>John Stratton Hawley, Untitled review of ''Kali's Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna'' by Jeffrey J. Kripal ''History of Religions'', Vol. 37, No. 4. (May, 1998), pp. 401-404. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0018-2710%28199805%2937%3A4%3C401%3AKCTMAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9] The University of Chicago Press</ref><ref><blockquote>In this impressively documented and well-written study, Kripal demonstrates that homosexual desire was the major driving force of Ramakrishna's mystical life.</blockquote>David L. Haberman, Untitled review of ''Kali's Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna'' by Jeffrey J. Kripal ''The Journal of Asian Studies'', Vol. 56, No. 2. (May, 1997), pp. 531-532. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-9118%28199705%2956%3A2%3C531%3AKCTMAT% 3E2.0.CO%3B2-X] Association for Asian Studies</ref><ref><blockquote>Ramakrishna was married, yet he claimed to have never had sexual relations with his wife. His sexual behaviour, in fact, was so unusual that it became the source of much speculation, and many theories have been put forward to explain it, and to see how, if at all, it might be linked to his strange religious behavior...It was Tantrism which supplied the framework which enabled Ramakrishna to express his aroused sexuality and channel it into an eroticized mysticism.</blockquote>Malcolm McLean, Untitled review of ''Kali's Child: The Mystical and Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna'' by Jeffrey Kripal ''Journal of the American Oriental Society'', Vol. 117, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1997), pp. 571-572 American Oriental Society [http://www.jstor.org/stable/605258]</ref><ref><blockquote>Moreover, from the time (1942) of the publication of Swami Nikhilananda's English translation and version of Mahendra Nath Gupta's Bengali ''Sri-ramakrsnakathnmrta'' entitled ''The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna'', the eccentric sexual fantasies and practices of Ramakrishna have been well-known, including [[transvestitism]], [[transsexuality]] (longings to become a girl widow), oral and [[anal sex]]ual fantasies (both heterosexual and homosexual), [[castration]] fantasies of one kind or another, and what psychoanalysis generally refers to as the "[[Polymorphous perversity|polymorphous sexuality]]" characteristic of the earliest stages of human development. None of this has been much of a "secret." Indeed, [[Sudhir Kakar]] in an interesting and sensitive psychoanalytic study of the erotic and the mystical in Ramakrishna, first published some years back in 1991, indicates that there would be little doubt that from a psychoanalytic point of view Ramakrishna could be diagnosed as a secondary [[transsexual]]. Narasingha P. Sil (Chapters 2 and 3) in his interesting book on Ramakrishna, entitled ''Ramakrsna Paramahamsa: A Psychological Profile'' (also first published in 1991), suggests that it is quite possible that the eccentric sexuality of Ramakrishna reflects considerable [[sexual abuse]] from the saint's early childhood. The point, in other words, is that all of this puzzling data about Ramakrishna's eccentric sexuality has been widely known for many years.</blockquote>Gerald James Larson, "Polymorphic Sexuality, Homoeroticism, and the Study of Religion" ''Journal of the American Academy of Religion'', Vol. 65, No. 3. (Autumn, 1997), pp. 655-665. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-7189%28199723%2965%3A3%3C655%3APSHATS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M] Oxford University Press</ref><ref><blockquote>It is certainly true that others had at least mentioned the themes of Ramakrishna's homosexuality (Isherwood 1981: 249; Masson 1974: 309-310,312; 1979: 331; 1980: 8-10,46-47; Kakar: 33; McLean: lxxii-lxxv; Sarkar 1985: 6, 70-71, 90, 103-106) and Tantra (McLean; Neevel) before me (indeed, one could speak of a consensus on the homosexual issue, at least among academics trained in historical-critical and analytic methods), but no one followed up on these themes (for reasons I will get to shortly); indeed, much, if not all, of the earlier discussion occurred in buried endnotes, passing comments, and unpublished, almost "underground:' documents.</blockquote>Jeffrey J. Kripal, "Mystical Homoeroticism, Reductionism, and the Reality of Censorship: A Response to Gerald James Larson" ''Journal of the American Academy of Religion'', Vol. 66, No. 3. (Autumn, 1998), pp. 627-635. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-7189%28199823%2966%3A3%3C627%3AMHRATR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H] Oxford University Press</ref> The Ramakrishna Movement has suppressed, and continues to suppress information related to Ramakrishna's sexuality and to his tantric practices.<ref><blockquote>This analysis [''Kali's Child''] will be controversial, particularly among the followers of Ramakrishna, who have sought over the years to deny, or at least downplay, the Tantric elements.</blockquote>Malcolm McLean, Untitled review of ''Kali's Child: The Mystical and Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna'' by Jeffrey Kripal ''Journal of the American Oriental Society'', Vol. 117, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1997), pp. 571-572 American Oriental Society [http://www.jstor.org/stable/605258]</ref><ref><blockquote>This Ramakrishna Movement was responsible for the translation, and publication of the English translation, of the primary source on Ramakrishna, the ''Sri-Sri-Ramakrsna-Kathamrta'', and this version is both incomplete and bowdlerized. And they have virtually suppressed what Kripal considers an equally important source, Ram Chandra Datta's ''Srisriramakrsna Paramahamsa-dever Jivanavrttdnta'', which has never been available to English readers and has never to my knowledge been used by any other scholar writing in English. This manipulation of the sources by the Ramakrishna Movement is significant because it has allowed the Mission to present a particular kind of explanation of Ramakrishna, that he was some kind of neo-Vedantist who taught that all religions are the same, and so on. It is Kripal's contention, and I am sure that he is correct, that this is wrong. And it is significant that the ''Jivana-vrttinta'' presents an altogether different picture of Ramakrishna.</blockquote>Malcolm McLean, Untitled review of ''Kali's Child: The Mystical and Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna'' by Jeffrey Kripal ''Journal of the American Oriental Society'', Vol. 117, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1997), pp. 571-572 American Oriental Society [http://www.jstor.org/stable/605258]</ref><ref><blockquote>While the Order recognizes the devotional path, which acknowledges the world by saying 'this, this' (iti, iti), it is nevertheless clear that accepted doctrine holds the ultimate goal of devotion to be the nondual state of awareness known as ''nirvikalpa-samadhi'' (see Saradnanda 1996, 1: 13-17). Not surprisingly, any attempt to foreground the fact of Ramakrishna's powerful Tantric devotion to the mother will be met with the denial: 'not this, not this.'...If one were to discover that what made this mystic function were the esoteric practices of Hindu Tantra and the dynamics of homoerotic desire, one had better believe one's research will be of more than historical interest to anyone remotely sympathetic to Ramakrishna and the Ramakrishna movement (which amounts to a large part of the population of Bengal and many, many more throughout India and the world). To borrow the terminology used so effectively by Kripal, one is now threatening to reveal a secret that has been kept carefully guarded for a century.</blockquote>Brian Hatcher, "Kali's Problem Child: Another Look at Jeffrey Kripal's Study of Sri Ramakrishna," ''International Journal of Hindu Studies'' 3/2 (August, 1999). 165-82.</ref><ref><blockquote>I did in fact explore, both anecdotally and historically, the limits of the tradition's willingness (if not in the way Larson proposes). One Bengali friend would only whisper to me about the censored passages, and this in his own home. Another felt uncomfortable talking about the issue in a restaurant. When I tried to locate a copy of Sumit Sarkar's powerful essay on the saint (Sarkar 1985)-everyone seemed to know about it, but no one seemed to have it-I felt as if I were asking to buy illegal drugs (not that I have ever done that). I also spoke to Indian intellectuals in Calcutta, whose responses could be summarized as follows: "You are right, but we cannot say that here. You, however, can and should say it over there." It was my willed distance and cultural otherness that gave me a perspective, a voice, and an emotional freedom that my Indian colleagues and friends either lacked or refused to claim as their own. From a thousand such interpersonal hints and cultural cues it became patently clear to me that I had stumbled upon a cultural "secret:' a topic well outside the bounds of possible public discourse.</blockquote>Jeffrey J. Kripal, "Mystical Homoeroticism, Reductionism, and the Reality of Censorship: A Response to Gerald James Larson" ''Journal of the American Academy of Religion'', Vol. 66, No. 3. (Autumn, 1998), pp. 627-635, ''passim''. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-7189%28199823%2966%3A3%3C627%3AMHRATR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H] Oxford University Press.</ref>


==Biography==
==Biography==

Revision as of 15:14, 17 February 2009

Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa
Ramakrishna at Dakshineswar

Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa (Bangla: রামকৃষ্ণ পরমহংস Ramkṛiṣṇo Pôromôhongśo) (February 18, 1836 - August 16, 1886), born Gadadhar Chattopadhyay[2] (Bangla: গদাধর চট্টোপাধ্যায় Gôdadhor Chôţţopaddhae), is a famous mystic of 19th-century India.[3] His religious school of thought led to the formation of the Ramakrishna Mission by his chief disciple Swami Vivekananda[4][5][6]—both were influential figures in the Bengali Renaissance[7] and the Hindu renaissance during 19th and 20th century.[8][9] He was considered an avatar or incarnation of God by many of his disciples, and is considered as such by many of his devotees today.[10]

Ramakrishna was born in a poor Brahmin Vaishnava family in rural Bengal. He became a priest of the Dakshineswar Kali Temple, dedicated to goddess Kali, which had the influence of the main strands of Bengali bhakti tradition.[2] His first spiritual teacher was an ascetic woman skilled in Tantra and Vaishnava bhakti. Later an Advaita Vedantin ascetic taught him non-dual meditation, and according to Ramakrishna, he experienced Nirvikalpa Samadhi under his guidance. Ramakrishna also experimented with other religions, notably Islam and Christianity, and said that they all lead to the same God.[2] Though conventionally uneducated, he attracted attention of the Bengali intelligentsia and middle class. He organized a group of followers, led by his chief disciple Swami Vivekananda.[11]

The Ramakrishna movement was brought to the West by Swami Vivekananda, who attracted attention at the first Parliament of the World's Religions at Chicago in 1893.[12] He established the Vedanta Society in America and in India he founded the Ramakrishna Mission.[11] The Ramakrishna movement has been termed as one of the revitalization movements of India.[13]


Biography

Birth and childhood

The small house at Kamarpukur where Ramakrishna lived (centre). The family shrine is on the left, birthplace temple on the right

Ramakrishna was born in 1836, in the village of Kamarpukur, in the Hooghly district of West Bengal, into a very poor but pious, orthodox brahmin family. His parents were Khudiram Chattopâdhyâya, and Chandramani Devî. Reportedly, Ramakrishna's parents experienced various supernatural incidents, visions before his birth. It is said that Ramakrishna was named Gadadhar in response to a dream Khudiram had in Gaya before Ramakrishna’s birth, in which Lord Gadadhara, the form of god Vishnu worshiped at Gaya, appeared to him and told him he would be born as his son. Chandramani Devi is said to have had a vision of light entering her womb before Ramakrishna's birth. Ramakrishna was born as the fourth and last child to his parents.[14]

Ramakrishna was a popular figure in his village. He is said to have had a natural gift for the fine arts like drawing and clay modeling. However, he disliked attending school, and rejected his schooling saying that he was not interested in mere "bread winning education". Though Ramakrishna shunned the traditional school system, he is said to have showed good aptitude in learning.[15][16] He reportedly became well versed in the songs, tales and dramas which were based on the religious scriptures.[17] He also became acquainted with the Puranas, the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, and the Bhagavata Purana, hearing them from wandering monks and the Kathaks—a class of men in ancient India who preached and sang the Purāṇas.[18] He learned to read and write in Bengali[19] and was able to follow Sanskrit even though he could not speak the language.[20]

Ramakrishna describes about his first spiritual ecstasy at the age of six or seven—while walking along the paddy fields, a flock of white cranes flying against a backdrop of dark thunder-clouds caught his vision. He reportedly became so absorbed by this scenery that he lost outward consciousness and experienced indescribable joy in that state.[21] Ramakrishna reportedly had experiences of similar nature a few other times in his childhood—while worshipping the goddess Vishalakshi, and portraying god Shiva in a drama during Shivaratri festival. From his tenth or eleventh year on, the trances became common.[22]

Ramakrishna's father died in 1843, after which the responsibilities fell on his elder brother Ramkumar. This event is considered to be one of the determinative points in Ramakrishna's religious life. This loss drew him closer to his mother, and he spent his time in household activities, including the daily worship of the household deities. He also became more involved in contemplative activities such as reading the sacred epics.[23] When Ramakrishna was into his teens, the family's financial position worsened. Ramkumar started a Sanskrit school in Calcutta and also served as a priest. Ramakrishna moved to Calcutta in 1852 and started assisting his elder brother in the priestly work.[24]

Priest at Dakshineswar Kali Temple

Dakshineswar Kāli Temple, where Ramakrishna spent a major portion of his adult life.
Bhavatārini Kali, the deity that Ramakrishna worshipped.

In 1855 Ramkumar was appointed as the priest of Dakshineswar Kali Temple, built by Rani Rashmoni—a rich woman of Calcutta who belonged to the kaivarta community.[25] Ramakrishna moved in with his brother only after some persuasion, since the temple was constructed by a low caste woman. Ramakrishna, along with his nephew Hriday, became assistants to Ramkumar, with Ramakrishna given the task of decorating the deity. When Ramkumar passed away in 1856, Ramakrishna took his place as the priest of the Kali temple. He was allotted a room in the northwestern corner of the temple courtyard, where he spent the rest of his life.[26] The name Ramakrishna is said to have been given him by Mathur Babu, the son-in-law of Rani Rashmoni.[27]

After Ramkumar's death Ramakrishna became more contemplative. He began to look upon the image of the goddess Kali as his mother and the mother of the universe. He became seized by a desire to have a vision of Kali—a direct realization of her reality—and believed the stone image to be living and breathing and taking food out of his hand. At times he would weep bitterly and cry out loudly while worshipping, and would not be comforted, because he could not see his mother Kali as perfectly as he wished. At night, he would go into a nearby jungle and spend the entire night meditating on God, without any consciousness of even his clothes falling off.[28] People became divided in their opinions—some held Ramakrishna to be mad, and some took him to be a great lover of God.[29]

One day, he was so impatient to see Mother Kali that he decided to end his life. Seizing a sword hanging on the wall, he was about to strike himself with it, when he is reported to have seen light issuing from the deity in waves. Ramakrishna describes his first vision of Kali as follows:

I had a marvelous vision of the Mother, and fell down unconscious....It was as if houses, doors, temples and everything else vanished altogether; as if there was nothing anywhere! And what I saw was an infinite shoreless sea of light; a sea that was consciousness. However, far and in whatever direction I looked, I saw shining waves, one after another, coming towards me.[30]

... What was happening in the outside world I did not know; but within me there was a steady flow of undiluted bliss, altogether new, and I felt the presence of the Divine Mother.[31]

Ramakrishna said that after the vision, he surrendered to Kali and childlike, he obeyed what he called the will of the Mother Kali in everything, no matter how trivial or philosophical. Although Rani Rasmani and her son-in-law Mathur Babu had faith in Ramakrishna and left him free do whatever he liked, they thought that Ramakrishna was suffering from the effects of unduly prolonged continence. So Mathur arranged for prostitutes to visit Ramakrishna, but their attempts to seduce Ramakrishna only failed. He took the prostitutes to be forms of Divine Mother herself.[32][33]

Marriage

Rumors spread to Kamarpukur that Ramakrishna had gone mad as a result of his over-taxing spiritual exercises at Dakshineswar. Ramakrishna's mother and his elder brother Rameswar decided to get Ramakrishna married, thinking that marriage would be a good steadying influence upon him—by forcing him to accept responsibility and to keep his attention on normal affairs rather than being obsessed with his spiritual practices and visions.[34] Far from objecting to the marriage, Ramakrishna mentioned that they could find the bride at the house of Ramchandra Mukherjee in Jayrambati, three miles to the north-west of Kamarpukur. The five-year-old bride, Sarada was found and the marriage was duly solemnised in 1859.[35] Ramakrishna was 23 at this point, but the age difference was typical for 19th century rural Bengal. After the marriage, Sarada stayed at Jayrambati and joined Ramakrishna in Dakshineswar at the age of 18.[36]

Religious practices and teachers

After his marriage Ramakrishna returned to Calcutta and resumed the charges of the temple again, but instead of toning down, his spiritual fervour and devotion only increased. To cultivate humility and eliminate the distinction between his own high Brahmin caste and pariahs belonging of low caste he would clean their quarters with his own hands and long hair.[37][38]

He would take gold and silver coins, and mixing them with rubbish, repeat "money is rubbish, money is rubbish". He later said that "I lost all perception of difference between the two in my mind, and threw them both into the Ganges. No wonder people took me for mad."[38] According to Swami Vivekananda, his hatred for money became so instinctive that his body would shrink back convulsively if were touched with a coin, even when asleep.[39] He was unable to attend to any external duties, he suffered from sleeplessness, and burning sensations throughout his body. Physicians were consulted, and one of them told, "It seems to me that the patient's condition is due to some kind of spiritual excitement—medicine won't cure him."[40][41]

Bhairavi Brahmani and Tantra

In 1861, Bhairavi Brahmani, an orange robed female ascetic appeared at Dakshineshwar. Her real name was Yogeshwari and she was in her late thirties.[42] She was well versed in scriptures and was adept in Tantric and Vaishnava methods of worship.[43][44]

Ramakrishna told the Bhairavi about his spiritual experiences and his seemingly abnormal physical conditions. The Bhairavi assured him that he was not mad but was experiencing phenomena that accompany mahabhava—the supreme attitude of loving devotion towards the divine[45] and quoting from the bhakti shastras, said that other religious figures like Radha and Chaitanya had similar experiences.[46] The Bhairavi also recommended the cure for Ramakrishna's physical ailments.[47]

The Bhairavi initiated Ramakrishna into the tantric practices, which expose the sense and spirit to all the disturbances of the flesh and imaginations, so that these may be transcended.[48][49] Under her guidance, he went through a full course of sixty four major tantric sadhanas.[45] He began with mantra rituals such as japa and purascarana and many other rituals designed to purify the mind and establish self-control. He later proceeded towards tantric sadhanas, which generally include a set of heterodox practices called vamachara (left-hand path), which utilize as a means of liberation, activities like eating of parched grain, fish and meat along with drinking of wine and sexual intercourse.[45] According to Ramakrishna and his biographers, Ramakrishna did not directly participate in the last two of those activities, all that he needed was a suggestion of them to produce the desired result.[45] Though Ramakrishna acknowledged the left-hand tantric path as another means of spiritual enlightenment, he did not recommend it to anybody.[50] Later, when Ramakrishna's chief disciple Vivekananda asked him about the left-hand path, he would say, "It is not a good path. It is very difficult and often brings about the downfall of the aspirant."[51]

The Bhairavi also taught Ramakrishna the kumari-puja, a form of ritual in which the Virgin Goddess is worshiped symbolically in the form of a young girl.[52] Under the tutelage of the Bhairavi, Ramakrishna also became an adept at Kundalini Yoga.[45] Ramakrishna completed his tantric sadhana in 1863.[53]

Ramakrishna took the attitude of a son towards the Bhairavi.[54] The Bhairavi on the other hand looked upon Ramakrishna as an avatara, or incarnation of the divine, and was the first person to openly declare that Ramakrishna was an avatara.[54] But Ramakrishna was indifferent and unconcerned about people calling him an incarnation.[55] The Bhairavi, with the yogic techniques and the tantra played an important part in the initial spiritual development of Ramakrishna.[2][56][57]

Vaishnava Bhakti

The Vaishnava Bhakti traditions speak of five different affective essences,[58] referred to as bhāvas—different attitudes that a devotee can take up to express his love for the God. They are: śānta, the serene attitude; dāsya, the attitude of a servant; sakhya, the attitude of a friend; vātsalya, the attitude of a mother toward her child; and madhura, the attitude of a woman towards her lover.[59][60]

At some point in the period between his vision of Kali and his marriage, Ramakrishna practiced dāsya bhāva—the attitude of a servant towards his master. He started worshiping Rama in the attitude of Hanuman, the monkey-god, who is considered to be the ideal devotee and servant of Rama. In doing so, Ramakrishna completely identified himself with Hanuman, he ate and walked like a monkey, spent much of his time in trees and his eyes got a restless look like the eyes of a monkey. According to Ramakrishna and his biographers, there was even a small growth in the lower part of his spine resembling the tail of a monkey.[61] As a climax to his dāsya experiment, Ramakrishna had a vision of Sita, the consort of Rama, merging into his body.[60][61]

In 1864, Ramakrishna practiced vātsalya bhāva, the attitude of a mother towards God. During this period, he worshipped a metal image of Ramlālā (Rama as a child) in the attitude of a mother. According to Ramakrishna, while he was observing this bhava, his character became filled with motherly tenderness, and he began to regard himself as a woman and even his speech and gestures changed to that of a woman. Ramakrishna further narrates that, he could actually feel the presence of child Rama as a living God in the metal image.[62][63]

Ramakrishna later engaged in the practice of madhura bhāva— the attitude of Gopis and Radha towards their lover, Krishna.[60] Ramakrishna, in order to realise this love, dressed himself in women's attire for several days and regarded himself as one of the Gopis of Vrindavan. At the end of this sadhana, he attained savikalpa samadhi—vision and union with Krishna.[64]

At some point, Ramakrishna visited Nadia, the home of Chaitanya and Nityananda, the 15th-century founders of Bengali Gaudiya Vaishnava bhakti. He had an intense vision of two young boys merging into his body.[64]

Earlier, after his vision of Kali, he is said to have cultivated the Santa bhava — the passive "peaceful" attitude — towards Kali.[60]

Totapuri and Vedanta

The Panchavati and the hut where Ramakrishna performed his advaitic sadhana. The mud hut has been replaced by a brick one.

In 1864, Ramakrishna was initiated into sanyassa by a vedantic ascetic, a wandering monk named Totapuri. Ramakrishna described Totapuri as "a teacher of masculine strength, a sterner mien, a gnarled physique, and a virile voice".[65] He addressed Totapuri as Nangta or Langta ("Naked One"), because it was considered unorthodox to address one's guru by name and also as a wandering monk of the Naga sect he did not wear any clothing.[66] Totapuri looked at the world as illusory and the worship of Gods and Goddesses as fantasies of the deluded mind. Instead, he believed in formless Brahman.[67]

Totapuri first guided Ramakrishna through the rites of sannyasa—renunciation of all ties to the world. Then he instructed him in the teaching of advaita—that "Brahman alone is real, and the world is illusory; I have no separate existence; I am that Brahman alone."[68] Under the guidance of Totapuri, Ramakrishna experienced Nirvikalpa Samadhi which is considered to be the highest state in spiritual realisation.[69]

Totapuri stayed with Ramakrishna for nearly eleven months and instructed him further in the teachings of advaita. After the departure of Totapuri, Ramakrishna reportedly remained for six months in a state of absolute contemplation.[70] Ramakrishna said that this period of nirvikalpa samadhi came to an end when he received a command from the Mother Kali, "Remain in Bhavamukha; for the enlightenment of the people, remain in Bhavamukha", referring to a state of existence intermediate between samādhi and normal consciousness.[71]

Islam and Christianity

In 1866, Govinda Roy, a Hindu guru who practiced Sufism, initiated Ramakrishna into Islam. Ramakrishna said:[72]

I devoutly repeated the name of Allah, wore a cloth like the Arab Moslems, said their prayer five times daily, and felt disinclined even to see images of the Hindu gods and goddesses, much less worship them—for the Hindu way of thinking had disappeared altogether from my mind.

After three days of practice he had a vision of a "radiant personage with grave countenance and white beard resembling the Prophet and merging with his body".[73]

At the end of 1873 he started the practice of Christianity, when his devotee Shambu Charan Mallik read the Bible to him. Ramakrishna said that for several days he was filled with Christian thoughts and no longer thought of going to the Kali temple. One day when Ramakrishna saw the picture of Madonna and Child Jesus, he felt that the figures became alive and had a vision in which Jesus merged with his body. In his own room amongst other divine pictures was one of Christ, and he burnt incense before it morning and evening. There was also a picture showing Jesus Christ saving St.Peter from drowning in the water.[74][64]

Sarada Devi

Sarada Devi (1853 – 1920)

According to the customs of that time, when the child bride Sarada Devi attained the age of seventeen or eighteen, it was her duty to join her husband, Ramakrishna. She had heard rumours that her husband had become mad, and was in deep grief. She also heard reports that he had become a great religious man.[75]

As a priest Ramakrishna performed the ritual ceremonies—the Shodashi Puja (the adoration of womanhood)—and considered Sarada Devi as the Divine Mother. Sarada Devi was made to sit in the seat of Kali, and worshiped with flowers and incense. Ramakrishna said that his view of woman as Mother was not limited to his companion Sarada Devi and he recognized the mother even in the most degraded prostitutes.[76] The marriage was never consummated because he regarded Sarada as the Divine Mother in person.[77]

Regarding Ramakrishna's treatment of her, Sarada Devi said, "I was married to a husband who never addressed me as 'tui.'(you) Ah! How he treated me! Not even once did he tell me a harsh word or wound my feelings."[78] Sarada Devi is considered as his first disciple. Ramakrishna referred to his wife as the Holy Mother, and it was by this name that she was known to his disciples. After Ramakrishna's death, Sarada Devi continued to play an important role in the nascent religious movement.[79]

Influence on Keshub Chunder Sen and Bhadralok

Ramakrishna in samadhi at the house of Keshab Chandra Sen. He is seen supported by his nephew Hriday and surrounded by brahmo devotees.

In 1875, Ramakrishna met the influential Brahmo Samaj leader Keshab Chandra Sen.[80][81] Keshab had accepted Christianity, and had separated from the Adi Brahmo Samaj. Formerly, Keshab had rejected idolatry, but under the influence of Ramakrishna he accepted Hindu polytheism and established the "New Dispensation" (Nava Vidhan) religious movement, based on Ramakrishna's principles—"Worship of God as Mother", "All religions as true" and "Assimilation of Hindu polytheism into Brahmoism".[82] Keshab also publicized Ramakrishna's teachings in the journals of New Dispensation over a period of several years,[83] which was instrumental in bringing Ramakrishna to the attention of a wider audience, especially the Bhadralok (English-educated classes of Bengal) and the Europeans residing in India.[84][85]

Following Keshab, other Brahmos such as Vijaykrishna Goswami started to admire Ramakrishna, propagate his ideals and reorient their socio-religious outlook. Many prominent people of Calcutta—Pratap Chandra Mazumdar, Shivanath Shastri and Trailokyanath Sanyal—began visiting him during this time (1871-1885). Mozoomdar wrote the first English biography of Ramakrishna, entitled The Hindu Saint in the Theistic Quarterly Review (1879), which played a vital role in introducing Ramakrishna to Westerners like the German indologist Max Muller.[83] Some former Brahmos proclaimed Ramakrishna's message to the educated public of Bengal through their speeches and writings, published in several newspapers and journals. Newspapers reported that Ramakrishna was spreading "Love" and "Devotion" among the educated classes of Calcutta and that he had succeeded in reforming the character of some youths whose morals had been corrupt.[83]

Ramakrishna also had interactions with Debendranath Tagore, the father of Rabindranath Tagore, and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, a renowned social worker. He had also met Swami Dayananda.[80] Not all Brahmos were uncritical admirers of Ramakrishna. Some disapproved of his ascetic renunciation. They measured him according to their own deals of the householder's life. Some could not understand his Samadhi and considered it to be a nervous malady.[80] Upadhyay Brahma­bandhab was originally a critic of Ramakrishna and refused to recognize him as an avatara.[86]

Ramakrishna's influence was not confined only to the elite educated class of Calcutta. During his lifetime his ideas and influence spread beyond the intelligentsia to other sections of Bengali society, including the Bauls and the Kartabhajas, and beyond Bengal itself. While he was alive, however, there was little of an active movement.[83] Ramakrishna played an important role in the Bengali Renaissance as a link between the Brahmo Samaj and the emergence of the Hindu Revival Movement.[7][8]

Among the Europeans who were influenced by Ramakrishna was Principal Dr. W.W. Hastie of the Scottish Church College, Calcutta.[87] In the course of explaining the word trance in the poem The Excursion by William Wordsworth, Hastie told his students that if they wanted to know its "real meaning", they should go to "Ramakrishna of Dakshineswar." This prompted some of his students, including Narendranath Dutta (later Swami Vivekananda), to visit Ramakrishna.[83]

Devotees and disciples

Some Monastic Disciples (L to R): Trigunatitananda, Shivananda, Vivekananda, Turiyananda, Brahmananda. Below Saradananda.
Mahendranath Gupta, a householder devotee and the author of Sri-Sri-Ramakrisna-kathamrta.

Most of his prominent disciples came between 1879-1885. Many were highly educated, and included atheists and a few who came just out of curiosity. However, they were deeply influenced by Ramakrishna's teachings and a few became his ardent disciples. Devotees like Surendranath Mitra, a confirmed libertine, first approached Ramakrishna with an intent to "twist his ears" (a gesture of insult), only to end up as an inveterate follower.[88] Ramakrishna had an extraordinary style of preaching and instructing, convincing even the most skeptical visitors.[79]

His chief disciples consisted of:[63]

  • Grihastas or The householdersMahendranath Gupta, Girish Chandra Ghosh, Akshay Kumar Sen and others.
  • Monastic disciples who renounced their family and became the earliest monks of the Ramakrishna order—Narendranath Dutta (Swami Vivekananda), Rakhal Chandra Ghosh (Swami Brahmananda), Kaliprasad Chandra (Swami Abhedananda), Taraknath Ghoshal (Swami Shivananda), Sashibhushan Chakravarty (Swami Ramakrishnananda), Saratchandra Chakravarty (Swami Saradananda) and others.
  • A small group of women disciples including Gauri Ma and Yogin Ma. A few of them were initiated into sanyasa through mantra deeksha. Among the women, Ramakrishna emphasized service to other women rather than tapasya (practice of austerities).[89] Gauri-ma founded the Saradesvari Ashrama at Barrackpur, which was dedicated to the education and uplift of women.[90]

As his name spread, an ever shifting crowd of all classes and castes visited Ramakrishna—"Maharajas and beggars, journalists and pandits, artists and devotees, Brahmos, Christians, and Mohammedans, men of faith, men of action and business, old men, women and children".[91][92] According to his biographers, Ramakrishna was very talkative and would out-talk the best-known orators of his time. For hours he would reminisce about his own eventful spiritual life, tell tales, explain abstruse Vedantic doctrines with extremely mundane illustrations, raise questions and answer them himself, crack jokes, sing songs, and mimic the ways of all types of worldly people—visitors were kept enthralled.[93][94]

Even though he had a band of dedicated renunciates, he never asked householders to renounce their family life.[95] In preparation for monastic life, Ramakrishna ordered his monastic disciples to beg their food from door to door without distinction of caste. He gave them the saffron robe, the sign of the Sanyasin, and initiated them with Mantra Deeksha.[94]

Last days

The Disciples and Devotees at Ramakrishna's funeral

In the beginning of 1885 Ramakrishna suffered from clergyman's throat, which gradually developed into throat cancer. He was moved to Shyampukur near Calcutta, where some of the best physicians of the time, including Dr. Mahendralal Sarkar, were engaged. When his condition aggravated he was relocated to a large garden house at Cossipore on December 11, 1885.[96]

During his last days, he was looked after by his disciples and Sarada Devi. Ramakrishna was advised by the doctors to keep the strictest silence, but ignoring their advice, he incessantly conversed with visitors.[84] Before his death, it is reported that Ramakrishna said to Vivekananda,[96] "Today I have given you my all and am now only a poor fakir, possessing nothing. By this power you will do immense good in the world and not until it is accomplished will you return to the absolute." It is reported that when Vivekananda, doubted Ramakrishna's claim of avatara, Ramakrishna said, "He who was Rama, He who was Krishna, He himself is now Ramakrishna in this body."[97] But others such as the veteran Brahmo leader Sibnath Sastri reports that the saint himself set aside all avataric claims saying, 'just fancy God Almighty dying of cancer in the throat!'.[98] During his final days, Ramakrishna asked Vivekananda to take care of other monastic disciples and asked them to look upon Vivekananda as their leader.[96]

His condition worsened gradually and he expired in the early morning hours of August 16, 1886 at the Cossipore garden house. According to his disciples, this was Mahasamadhi.[99] After the death of their master, the monastic disciples lead by Vivekananda formed a fellowship at a half-ruined house at Baranagar near the river Ganga, with the financial assistance of the householder disciples. This became the first Math or monastery of the disciples who consistuted the first Ramakrishna Order.[79]

Biographical sources

Teachings

Ramakrishna's teachings were imparted in rustic Bengali, using stories and parables.[2] Ramakrishna's teachings made a powerful impact on the Calcutta's intellectuals, despite the fact that his preachings were far removed from issues of modernism or national independence.[100] His spiritual movement indirectly aided nationalism, as it rejected caste distinctions and religious prejudices.[100]

Ramakrishna emphasised God-realisation as the supreme goal of all living beings.[101] According to Ramakrishna, the idea of sex and the idea of money were the two main delusions that prevent people from realizing God, and that god-realization can be achieved by renouncing Kama-Kanchana (lust and gold).[102] Ramakrishna looked upon the world as Maya and he explained that avidya maya represents dark forces of creation (e.g. sensual desire, evil passions, greed, lust and cruelty), which keep people on lower planes of consciousness. These forces are responsible for human entrapment in the cycle of birth and death, and they must be fought and vanquished. Vidya maya, on the other hand, represents higher forces of creation (e.g. spiritual virtues, enlightening qualities, kindness, purity, love, and devotion), which elevate human beings to the higher planes of consciousness.[103]

Ramakrishna practised several religions, including Islam and Christianity, and recognized that in spite of the differences, all religions are valid and true and they lead to the same ultimate goal—God.[104] Ramakrishna's proclaimed that jatra jiv tatra Shiv (wherever there is a living being, there is Shiva) which stemmed from his Advaitic perception of Reality. His teaching, "Jive daya noy, Shiv gyane jiv seba" (not kindness to living beings, but serving the living being as Shiva Himself) is considered as the inspiration for the philanthropic work carried out by his chief disciple Vivekananda.[105]

Impact

Several organizations have been established in the name of Ramakrishna.[106] The Ramakrishna Math and Mission is one of the main organizations founded by Swami Vivekananda in 1897. The Mission conducts extensive work in health care, disaster relief, rural management, tribal welfare, elementary and higher education. The movement is considered as one of the revitalization movements of India.[107][106] Other organizations include, Ramakrishna-Vedanta Society founded by Swami Abhedananda in 1923, the Ramakrishna Vivekananda Mission formed by Swami Nityananda in 1976 and the Sri Sarada Math and Ramakrishna Sarada Mission was founded in 1959 as a sister organization by the Ramakrishna Math and Mission.[106]

Ramakrishna was born during a period of social upheaval in Bengal in particular and India in general. During Ramakrishna's time, Hinduism faced a significant intellectual challenge from Westerners and Indians alike. The Hindu practice of Idol worship came under attack especially in Bengal, and many had denounced Hinduism and embraced Christianity or atheism. Ramakrishna and his movement, the Ramakrishna Mission, played a leading role in the modern revival of Hinduism in India, and on modern Indian history. His life and teachings were an important part of the renaissance that Bengal, and later India, experienced in the 19th century. Many great thinkers including Max Muller, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sri Aurobindo, Leo Tolstoy have acknowledged Ramakrishna's contribution to humanity. Ramakrishna's influence is also seen in the works of the artists like Franz Dvorak and Philip Glass.

Reception

In his influential[108] 1896 essay "A real mahatma: Sri Ramakrishna Paramahansa Dev" and his 1899 book Râmakrishna: His Life and Sayings, the German philologist and Orientalist Max Müller potrayed Ramakrishna as "a wonderful mixture of God and man" and as "...a Bhakta, a worshipper or lover of the deity, much more than a Gñânin or a knower."[109][110]

In London and New York in 1896, Swami Vivekanana delivered his famous address on Ramakrishna entitled "My Master." He said of his master: "this great intellect never learnt even to write his own name, but the most brilliant graduates of our university found in him an intellectual giant."[111] Vivekananda criticized his followers for projecting Ramakrishna as an avatara and miracle-worker.[112][113]

In a letter to Sigmund Freud which would affect Freud's thinking on religion,[114] Romain Rolland described the mystical states achieved by Ramakrishna and other mystics as an "'oceanic' sentiment," one which Rolland had also experienced.[115] Rolland believed that the universal human religious emotion resembled this "oceanic sense."[116] In his 1929 book La vie de Ramakrishna, Rolland distinguished between the feelings of unity and eternity which Ramakrishna experienced in his mystical states and Ramakrishna's interpretation of those feelings as the goddess Kali.[117]

In the 1950s, Indologist Heinrich Zimmer was the first Western scholar to interpret Ramakrishna's worship of the Divine Mother as containing specifically Tantric elements.[118]

Christopher Isherwood's 1965 Ramakrishna and his Disciples introduced Ramakrishna to a Western audience from the perspective of a devotee.[119] In a late interview, Isherwood said of Ramakrishna: "He was completely without any hang-ups, talking about sex-roles, because his thoughts completely transcended physical love-making. He even saw the mating of two dogs on the street as an expression of the eternal male-female principle in the universe."[120][121]

In his 1991 book The Analyst and the Mystic, Indian psychoanalyst Sudhir Kakar saw in Ramakrishna's visions a spontaneous capacity for creative experiencing.[122] Kakar also argued that culturally relative concepts of eroticism and gender have contributed to the Western difficulty in comprehending Ramakrishna.[123] Kakar saw Ramakrishna's seemingly bizarre acts as part of a bhakti path to God.[124]

Jeffrey Kripal's controversial[125] Kali's Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna (1995) argued that Ramakrishna rejected Advaita Vedanta in favor of Shakti Tantra.[126] In this psychoanalytic study of Ramakrishna's life, Kripal portrayed Ramakrishna’s mystical experiences as symptoms of repressed homoeroticism.[127] Some scholars agreed — John Stratton Hawley wrote that Kripal had established that Ramakrishna associated his strong attractions for young men with his mystical experience of Kali.[128] Other scholars, including Huston Smith and Gerald James Larson, disagreed. Larson wrote that Kripal had failed to show a causal relationship between the erotic symbolism and Ramakrishna's religious experiences.[129]

In 1999, postcolonial historian Sumit Sarkar argued that he found in the Kathamrita traces of a binary opposition between unlearned oral wisdom and learned literate knowledge. He argues that all of our information about Ramakrishna, a rustic near-illiterate Brahmin, comes from urban bhadralok devotees, "...whose texts simultaneously illuminate and transform."[130] In 2007, postcolonial literary theorist Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak wrote that Ramakrishna was a "Bengali bhakta visionary" and that as a bhakta, he turned chiefly towards Kali.[131]

Notes

  1. ^ "The Art of God-Realisation". Times of India. Retrieved 2008-10-09.
  2. ^ a b c d e Smart, Ninian The World’s Religions (1998) p.409, Cambridge
  3. ^ Georg, Feuerstein (2002). The Yoga Tradition. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 600. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  4. ^ Clarke, Peter Bernard (2006). New Religions in Global Perspective. Routledge. p. 209. The first Hindu to teach in the West and founder of the Ramakrishna Mission in 1897, Swami Vivekananda,[...] is also credited with raising Hinduism to the status of a world religion.
  5. ^ Jeffrey Brodd (2003). World Religions: A Voyage of Discovery. Saint Mary's Press. p. 275. In 1897 Swami Vivekananda returned to India, where he founded the Ramakrishna Mission, and influential Hindu organization devoted to education, social welfare, and publication of religious texts. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ Smith, Bardwell L. (1976). Hinduism: New Essays in the History of Religions. Brill Archive. p. 93.
  7. ^ a b Miller, Timothy (1995). America's Alternative Religions. SUNY Press. pp. 174–175. ISBN 9780791423974. ...Bengalis played a leading role in the wider Hindu renaissance, producing what can be termed the Bengali "Neo-Vedantic renaissance" {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  8. ^ a b Pelinka, Anton (2003). Democracy Indian Style. Transaction Publishers. pp. 40–41. ISBN 9780765801869. The Bengali Renaissance had numerous facets including the spiritual (Hindu) renaissance, represented by the names of Sri Ramakrishna and Swami Vivekananda, the combination of spiritual, intellectual, and political aspects... {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ Bhattacharyya, Haridas (1978). "Part IV: Sri Ramakrishna and Spiritual Renaissance". The Cultural Heritage of India. University of Michigan: Ramakrishna Mission, Institute of Culture. p. 650.
  10. ^ Jackson, Carl T. (1994). Vedanta for the West. Indiana University Press. p. 78. ISBN 9780253330987.
  11. ^ a b Dehsen, Christian D. Von (1999). Philosophers and Religious Leaders. p. 159. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ Jackson, p. 35.
  13. ^ Cyrus R. Pangborn. "The Ramakrishna Math and Mission". Hinduism: New Essays in the History of Religions. p. 98.
  14. ^ "The Birth of Ramakrishna". Ramakrishna and His Disciples. p. 13.
  15. ^ Neevel, Transformation of Sri Ramakrishna, p.70 "The point to be made is that we are not dealing with an uneducated or ignorant ecstatic. Rather, because of his intelligence, his interest, his own study and his subsequent contact with Hindus of all schools of thought, we should realize that we are dealing with a well versed Hindu thinker who, because of the ecstatic nature of his religious experience, refused to be bound in and restricted by what he viewed as dry, rationalistic requirements of systematic discourse."
  16. ^ Bhawuk, Dharm P.S. (2003). "Culture's influence on creativity: the case of Indian spirituality". International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 27 (1). Elsevier: 1–22. Scholars have called him "the illiterate genius" {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  17. ^ Isherwood, Christopher (1974). Ramakrishna and His Disciples. Advaita Ashrama. p. 28.
  18. ^ Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna his Life and Sayings. p. 33. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  19. ^ Saradananda, Swami. The Great Master. p. 59.
  20. ^ Nikhilananda, Swami (1942). "Chapter 20 — Rules for householders and monks". The Gospel of Ramakrishna. During my boyhood I could understand what the Sadhus read at the Lahas' house at Kamarpukur, although I would miss a little here and there. If a pundit speaks to me in Sanskrit I can follow him, but I cannot speak it myself.... The realization of God is enough for me. What does it matter if I don't know Sanskrit? {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  21. ^ Zaleski, Philip (2006). "The Ecstatic". Prayer: A History. Mariner Books. pp. 162–163.
  22. ^ Neevel, Transformation of Sri Ramakrishna, p.70
  23. ^ Neevel, Transformation of Sri Ramakrishna, p.68
  24. ^ "The Boyhood of Ramakrishna". Ramakrishna and His Disciples. p. 37.
  25. ^ Amiya P. Sen, "Sri Ramakrishna, the Kathamrita and the Calcutta middle Classes: an old problematic revisited" Postcolonial Studies, 9: 2 p 176
  26. ^ Isherwood, Christopher (1974). Ramakrishna and his Disciples. Advaita Ashrama. pp. 55–57.
  27. ^ Life of Sri Ramakrishna, Advaita Ashrama, Ninth Impression, December 1971, p. 44
  28. ^ "Chapter I". Kathamrita. Vol. 2. Translated by unknown. When I [Ramakrishna] was in that state, everything blew away from me as if by the cyclone of Aswin. No indication of my previous life remained! I lost external awareness! Even my dhoti fell off, so how could I care for the sacred thread? I said to him, 'If you once experience that madness for the Lord, you will understand.' {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  29. ^ Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna his Life and Sayings. p. 37. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  30. ^ Isherwood, Christopher (1965). Ramakrishna and his Disciples. p. 65.
  31. ^ Nikhilananda, Swami (1942). "Chapter 1 — Introduction". The Gospel of Ramakrishna. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  32. ^ Gupta, Mahendranath. "section 17". Kathamrita. I used to cry uttering, 'Mother, Mother' in such a way that people would stand to watch me. At this state of mine someone brought a prostitute and made her sit in my room to tempt me and to cure me of my madness. She was a pretty woman with attractive eyes. I ran out of the room uttering, 'Mother, Mother.' And shouting for Haladhari, I said, 'Brother, come and see who has entered in my room.' I told about it to Haladhari and all others. In this state I used to weep uttering, 'Mother, Mother' and say to Her crying, 'Mother, save me. Mother, purify me so that my mind may not go from the right to the wrong.' {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  33. ^ Isherwood, Christopher (1974). Ramakrishna and his Disciples. Advaita Ashrama. pp. 66–70.
  34. ^ Nair, K. K. (2007). Sages Through Ages. Vol. 3. AuthorHouse. p. 13.
  35. ^ Sil, Divine Dowager, p. 42
  36. ^ Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (December 28, 2007). "Moving Devi". Other Asias. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 207–208.
  37. ^ Yale, John and Isherwood, Christopher, ed. (2006). What Religion is, in the Words of Swami Vivekananda. Kessinger Publishing. p. 219. ISBN 9781425488802.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  38. ^ a b Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna: His Life and Sayings. p. 42. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  39. ^ J. N. Farquhar (1915). Modern religious movements in India. New York: The Macmillan Company. p. 195.
  40. ^ Isherwood, Christopher (1974). Ramakrishna and his Disciples. Advaita Ashrama. p. 84.
  41. ^ Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna his Life and Sayings. p. 39. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  42. ^ Isherwood, p. 89–90
  43. ^ The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, Introduction
  44. ^ Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna his Life and Sayings. pp. 43–44. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  45. ^ a b c d e Neevel, pp. 74-77
  46. ^ Jestice, Phyllis G. (2004). Holy People of the World: A Cross-cultural Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 723.
  47. ^ Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna his Life and Sayings. p. 43. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  48. ^ Romain Rolland, p. 22–37
  49. ^ Jean Varenne (1977). Yoga and the Hindu Tradition. University of Chicago Press. p. 151. we know that certain Tantric practices, condemned as shockingly immoral, are aimed solely at enabling the adept to make use of the energy required for their realization in order to destroy desire within himself root and branch {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  50. ^ Isherwood, p. 76, "I tell you, this is also one of the paths – though it's a dirty one. There are several doors leading into a house – the main door, the back door, and the door by which the sweeper enters to clean out dirt. So, this too, is a door. No matter which door people use, they get inside the house, all right. Does that mean you should act like them, or mix with them?"
  51. ^ "Chapter II". Kathamrita. Vol. 2. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  52. ^ Sil, Divine Dowager, p. 42
  53. ^ Isherwood, p. 101
  54. ^ a b Rolland, Romain (1929). "The Two Guides of Knowledge". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 22–37.
  55. ^ Isherwood, p. 96
  56. ^ Richards, Glyn (1985). A Source-book of modern Hinduism. Routledge. p. 63. [Ramakrishna] received instructions in yogic techniques which enabled him to control his spiritual energy.
  57. ^ Neevel, Transformation of Sri Ramakrishna, p.70, "Ramakrishna's practice of tantra played an important role in Ramakrishna's transformation from the uncontrollable and self-destructive madman of the early years into the saintly and relatively self-controlled—if eccentric and ecstatic—teacher of the later years." }}
  58. ^ Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (December 28, 2007). "Moving Devi". Other Asias. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 197.
  59. ^ Nikhilananda, Swami (1942). "ADVICE TO HOUSEHOLDERS". The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna. p. 115. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  60. ^ a b c d Neevel, Walter G (1976). "The Transformation of Ramakrishna". Hinduism: New Essays in the History of Religions. pp. 72–83. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  61. ^ a b Isherwood, pp. 70–73
  62. ^ Isherwood, p. 197–198.
  63. ^ a b Nikhilananda, Swami. "Introduction". The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  64. ^ a b c Parama Roy, Indian Traffic: Identities in Question in Colonial and Post-Colonial India Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998
  65. ^ Nikhilananda, Swami (1942). "Chapter 1 — Introduction". The Gospel of Ramakrishna. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  66. ^ "Tota Puri". Ramakrishna and His Disciples. p. 116.
  67. ^ Harding, Elizabeth U. (1998). Kali: The Black Goddess of Dakshineswar. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 263. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  68. ^ The Great Master, p. 255.
  69. ^ Roland, Romain The Life of Ramakrishna (1984), Advaita Ashram
  70. ^ "For six months in a stretch, I [Ramakrishna] remained in that state from which ordinary men can never return; generally the body falls off, after three weeks, like a mere leaf. I was not conscious of day or night. Flies would enter my mouth and nostrils as they do a dead's body, but I did not feel them. My hair became matted with dust." Swami Nikhilananda, Ramakrishna, Prophet of New India, New York, Harper and Brothers, 1942, p. 28.
  71. ^ Isherwood, Christopher. "Tota Puri". Ramakrishna and his Disciples. p. 123.
  72. ^ Isherwood, Christopher. Ramakrishna and his Disciples. p. 124.
  73. ^ Rolland, Romain (1929). "The Return to Man". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 49–62.
  74. ^ Ramakrishna Mission Singapore (2007). "Lay Disciples of Ramakrishna". Nirvana. Ramakrishna Mission, Singapore. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  75. ^ Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna his Life and Sayings. pp. 52–53. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  76. ^ Rolland, Romain (1929). "The Return to Man". The Life of Ramakrishna. p. 59.
  77. ^ Isherwood, Ramakrishna and His Disciples, pp. 144-146.
  78. ^ Sri Ramakrishna Math (1984). "Her Devotee-Children". The Gospel of The Holy Mother Sri Sarada Devi. p. xx.
  79. ^ a b c Leo Schneiderman (Spring, 1969). "Ramakrishna: Personality and Social Factors in the Growth of a Religious Movement". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 8. London: Blackwell Publishing: 60–71. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  80. ^ a b c Rolland, Romain (1929). "Ramakrishna and the Great Shepherds of India". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 110–130.
  81. ^ Farquhar, John Nicol (1915). Modern Religious Movements in India. p. 194. About 1875, Keshab Chandra Sen made his acquaintance and became very interested in him (Ramakrishna). {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |publsher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help)
  82. ^ Y. Masih (2000). A Comparative Study of Religions. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 198–199.
  83. ^ a b c d e Mukherjee, Dr. Jayasree (2004). "Sri Ramakrishna's Impact on Contemporary Indian Society". Prabuddha Bharatha. Retrieved 2008-09-04. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  84. ^ a b Muller, Max (1898). "Râmakrishna's Life". Râmakrishna his Life and Sayings. pp. 56–57. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  85. ^ Debarry, William Theodore (1988). Sources of Indian Tradition: From the Beginning to 1800. Stephen N. Hay. Columbia University Press. p. 63. ISBN 9780231064156. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  86. ^ Mukherjee, Dr. Jayasree (2004). "Sri Ramakrishna's Impact on Contemporary Indian Society". Prabuddha Bharata. Retrieved 2008-09-22. Another contemporary scholar described Ramakrishna as "an illiterate priest, crude, raw, unmodern and the commonest of the common. ... He respected women, in the only way open to Indians, by calling them 'mother', and avoiding them.... He would allow non-Brahmins to be initiated. ... Yet, and this is the tragedy of the situation, with all the help of the dynamic personality of Swami Vivekananda, Paramahamsa Deb's influence has not succeeded in shaking our social foundations. A number of people have been inspired, no doubt, but the masses have not trembled in their sleep." {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  87. ^ Joseph, Jaiboy (002-06-23). "Master visionary". The Hindu. Retrieved 2008-10-09. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  88. ^ Chetanananda, swami. They Lived with God. p. 110.
  89. ^ Chetanananda, Swami (1989). They Lived with God. St. Louis: Vedanta Society of St. Louis. p. 163.
  90. ^ Beckerlegge (2006), Swami Vivekananda's Legacy of Service, p.27
  91. ^ Rolland, Romain (1929). "The Call of disciples". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 131–142.
  92. ^ Amiya.P.Sen(2006), Kathamrita and the Calcutta middle classes, p.172 "the author of the Kathamrita offers information about a great variety of people with very different interests converging at Dakshineswar. There are, for instance, childless widows, young school-boys (K1: 240, 291; K2: 30, 331; K3: 180, 185, 256), aged pensioners (K5: 69-70), Hindu scholars or religious figures (K2: 144, 303; K3: 104, 108, 120; K4: 80, 108, 155, 352), men betrayed by lovers (K1: 319), people with suicidal tendencies (K4: 274-275), small-time businessmen (K4: 244), and, of course, adolescents dreading the grind of samsaric life (K3: 167)."
  93. ^ Chakrabarti, Arindam (1994). "The dark mother flying kites : Sri ramakrishna's metaphysic of morals". Sophia. 33 (3). Springer Netherlands: 14–29. doi:10.1007/BF02800488. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  94. ^ a b Rolland, Romain (1929). "The Master and his Children". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 143–168.
  95. ^ Rolland, Romain (1929). "The Master and his Children". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 143–168. What will you gain by renouncing the world? Family life is like a fort. It is easier to fight the enemy from within the fort than from without. You will be in a position to renounce the world when you can bestow three-fourths of your mind on God, but not before." , "What is the necessity of giving up the world altogether? It is enough to give up the attachment to it.
  96. ^ a b c Rolland, Romain (1929). "The River Re-Enters the Sea". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 201–214.
  97. ^ "Cossipore and the Master". The Life of Swami Vivekananda: By His Eastern and Western Disciples. Vol. I. Mayavati: Advaita Ashrama. 2006. p. 183. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  98. ^ A.P.Sen, Kathamrita and the Calcutta Middle Class, p.168
  99. ^ Rolland, Romain (1929). "The River Re-Enters the Sea". The Life of Ramakrishna. pp. 201–214.
  100. ^ a b Menon, Parvathi (November 1, 1996). "A History of Modern India: Revivalist Movements and Early Nationalism". India Abroad.
  101. ^ Kathamrita, 1/10/6
  102. ^ Jackson, pp. 20-21.
  103. ^ Neevel, p. 82.
  104. ^ Cohen, Martin (2008). "Spiritual Improvisations: Ramakrishna, Aurobindo, and the Freedom of Tradition". Religion and the Arts. 12 (1–3). BRILL: 277–293. doi:10.1163/156852908X271079. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  105. ^ Y. Masih (2000). A Comparative Study of Religions. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 207.
  106. ^ a b c Beckerlegge,Swami Vivekananda's Legacy of Service pp.1-3
  107. ^ Cyrus R. Pangborn. "The Ramakrishna Math and Mission". Hinduism: New Essays in the History of Religions. p. 98.
  108. ^ John Rosselli, "Sri Ramakrishna and the educated elite of late nineteenth century" Contributions to Indian Sociology 1978; 12; 195 [1]
  109. ^ Friedrich Max Müller, Râmakrishna: His Life and Sayings, pp.93-94, Longmans, Green, 1898
  110. ^ Neevel, Transformation of Sri Ramakrishna, p.85
  111. ^ Sil, 1993 p56
  112. ^ A.P.Sen (2006) "Kathamrita and the Calcutta Middle Classes", p.173
  113. ^ John Wolffe (2004). "The Hindu Renaissance and notions of Universal Religion". Religion in History. Manchester University Press. p. 153.
  114. ^ "Oceanic Feeling" by Henri Vermorel and Madeleline Vermoral in International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis [2]
  115. ^ The Enigma of the Oceanic Feeling: Revisioning the Psychoanalytic Theory of Mysticism By William Barclay Parsons, Oxford University Press US, 1999 ISBN 0195115082, p 37
  116. ^ page 12 Primitive Passions: Men, Women, and the Quest for Ecstasy By Marianna Torgovnick University of Chicago Press, 1998
  117. ^ Parsons 1999, 14
  118. ^ Neeval and Hatcher, "Ramakrishna" in Encyclopedia of Religion, 2005 p 7613
  119. ^ Hatcher 2005, p 7614
  120. ^ "Christopher Isherwood: An Interview" Carolyn G. Heilbrun and Christopher Isherwood Twentieth Century Literature, Vol. 22, No. 3, Christopher Isherwood Issue (Oct., 1976), pp. 253-263 Published by: Hofstra University
  121. ^ Conversations with Christopher Isherwood, p.142, Univ. Press of Mississippi, 2001
  122. ^ Parsons, 1999 p 133
  123. ^ Kakar, Sudhir, The Analyst and the Mystic, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), p.34
  124. ^ Parsons, 1999 p 133
  125. ^ Balagangadhara, S. N. (2008). "Are Dialogues Antidotes to Violence? Two Recent Examples from Hinduism Studies" (PDF). Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies. 7 (19): 118–143. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  126. ^ Parsons 1999, 135-136
  127. ^ Parsons, William B., "Psychology" in Encyclopedia of Religion, 2005 p. 7479
  128. ^ John Stratton Hawley, Untitled review of Kali's Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna by Jeffrey J. Kripal History of Religions, Vol. 37, No. 4. (May, 1998), p.403 The University of Chicago Press
  129. ^ "None of the evidence cited in the book supports a cause-effect relation between the erotic and the mystical (or the religious), much less an identity! That erotic symbolism, including to some extent homoerotic symbolism, is clearly present in some, or even many, of the saint's unusual religious experiences, in no way establishes a causal relation between the two. There is a clear correlation, to be sure, possibly even an "elective affinity" in the Weberian sense, but hardly an established causal relation or any kind of identity!" Gerald James Larson, "Polymorphic Sexuality, Homoeroticism, and the Study of Religion" Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 65, No. 3. (Autumn, 1997), p. 660.
  130. ^ Sumit Sarkar, "Post-modernism and the Writing of History" Studies in History 1999; 15; 293
  131. ^ Spivak (2007), Other Asias, p.197

References

Further reading

  • Ananyananda, Swami (1981). Ramakrishna: a biography in pictures. Advaita Ashrama, Calcutta. ISBN 978-8185843971.
  • Chetanananda, Swami (1990). Ramakrishna As We Saw Him. St. Louis: Vedanta Society of St Louis. ISBN 978-0916356644.
  • Hourihan, Paul. Ramakrishna & Christ, the Supermystics: New Interpretations. Vedantic Shores Press. ISBN 1-931816-00-X.
  • Olson, Carl (1990). The Mysterious Play of Kālī: An Interpretive Study of Rāmakrishna. American Academy of Religion (Scholars Press). ISBN 1-55540-339-5.
  • Satyananda, Saraswati. Ramakrishna: The Nectar of Eternal Bliss. Devi Mandir Publications. ISBN 1-877795-66-6.
  • Torwesten, Hans (1999). Ramakrishna and Christ, or, The paradox of the incarnation. The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture. ISBN 978-8185843971.

External links


Template:Persondata