User talk:Xtremedood

Welcome!

Hello, Xtremedood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 03:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Question

Hey, I noticed your extensive edits on various Persian Sufi-related articles. I am just wondering, are you at all possibly from Iran yourself? I am fascinated by much of Persian / Iranian culture, and I would like to learn more about it however I can. RezaFarhad (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahab al-Din Abu Hafs Umar Suhrawardi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

DRN

There is a discussion on the DRN about the edits at Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Alaih-e-Salam. Please comment with your viewsFreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Hafez

I guess I removed a reference that should have stayed in Hafez. Sorry about that. I'd just like to remind you that it is customary to leave a brief edit summary before you save your edit. Happy editing! CorinneSD (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Battle articles being wrongly edited

are you okay or not Do you not know about battle of Sirhind,battle of sarsa etc. See fateh burj it commemorates the victory of Sikhs over sirhind and defeat of Mughal army .why you are editing inappropriate information  ? Are you a communal person you not even know history and you just keep editing false information. Check the sources then you will realize your mistakes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ak107839 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Just to let you know, this user got blocked for disruptive editing. Seems the IP address is now doing the same thing to the same pages, I'm now watching those pages too, so will help remove these bad edits. Hopefully this craziness will go away. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Heads up; Ak107839 and Aradhyasharma are sockpuppets of indef blocked Amanharleen, which are all now indef blocked. Richard Harvey (talk) 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Purandar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mughal, Purandar and Jai Singh

Battle of Chaksana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mughal and Bharatpur

Battle of Khelna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mughal and Asad Khan

Battle of Lalsot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mughal and Tunga

Battle of Raigarh (1689) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mughal and Rajaram

First Battle of Katwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mughal and Hooghly

Siege of Gingee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mughal and Rajaram

Battle of Bhupalgarh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Battle of Burdwan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Battle of Kalyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Battle of Satara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Battle of Torna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Second Battle of Katwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Siege of Jinji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Warning

If you do not stop your vandalism now, you will be dragged to an administrator and your ip will be blocked. Ghatus (talk) 10:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Hopefully administration is wise enough to see the immense biases in the Maratha-related articles here. They are filled with little more than Hindutva propaganda. Xtremedood (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

As I said, you are destroying the entire articles. Almost blanking the whole pages. Deleting all the references. Not improving at all. There is talk page. Discuss every point there. I am just undoing your blanking of Wiki pages.Ghatus (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

It is not blanking. It is the removal of unsourced, biased, and incorrect materials, which happens to make up the majority of many of these articles. Xtremedood (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Favonian (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Saunshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Invite

A Barnstar!

Please participate There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. 78.149.193.255 (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning Kansas Bear, however I have reviewed the edits and I believe that I was only at 2 reverts (please correct me if I am wrong). I made my initial changes on April 11, at around 11:15-11:30. However the first revert was done by Ghatus, on 06:45, 13 April 2015‎. I reverted for the first time on 04:30, 13 April 2015‎ ‎ and the second time on 07:09, 13 April 2015‎, which makes for a total of two reverts. Ghatus on the other hand reverted 3 times (with me) and more with other users. Xtremedood (talk) 02:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

WP:AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification of WP:ARE

Don't forget to check WP:ARE. There is a complaint about you. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the List of converts to Islam from Christianity page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Sarmad Kashani page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of converts to Islam from Christianity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dutch, Portugese, Murat Reis and Ottoman

List of converts to Islam from Hinduism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

List of former Buddhists (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tibetan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of converts to Islam from Christianity page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

New

Excuse me sir. Good afternoon I want to say that you are editing irrelevant information about the Second Battle of Anandpur .I 'll suggest you to go through the article first . Shah439 (talk) 06:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Shah439, go to the talk page, I have set up a discussion where you may add any relevant information. If you have proof state it. What you are doing seemingly amounts to vandalism. Xtremedood (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 4 May 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 13:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of converts to Islam from Christianity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Irish and Scottish

Battle of Jalalabad (1710) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jalal Khan

Battle of Jammu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Dhul-Nun al-Misri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Egyptian

Siege of Sirhind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wazir Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation accepted

The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.

As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.

For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 15:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Canvassing

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• "4 Indians and 1 non-Indian", you have said it twice while none of those editors(maybe except 1) claims to be an Indian. Such remark can be considered as a personal attack. If you wouldn't retract that part from your comment, I would consider bringing the matter to either WP:ARE or WP:ANI. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Dear Xtremedood, please do read WP:CANVASSING. Perhaps you can rectify the situation by notifying other editors to make a balanced collection as shows in the guidelines. Otherwise, the votes of the editors you have canvassed will be discounted. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• You can check Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xtremedood now. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)