Jump to content

Alex Kozinski: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Essayist: reworded essay sentence (even though unsourced, added tag) and removed rest as unsourced WP:OR, simplified first sentence
BENJAS SR (talk | contribs)
36 edits
Line 34: Line 34:


== Notable cases ==
== Notable cases ==
*''*'''''Please, your support is needed in a current appeal/case'''
[https://apps.facebook.com/fundrazr/?ref=bookmarks&fb_source=bookmarks_apps&fb_bmpos=1_ '''Benjamin Ayala Lopez Vs. Erick H.Holder Jr.''', 9th. Circuit Court of Appeals, San Francisco, CA.]

===''Thompson v. Calderon''===
===''Thompson v. Calderon''===
Thomas Martin Thompson had been convicted based largely on the testimony of his fellow inmates, and there were doubts about the effectiveness of his defense counsel that led seven former California prosecutors to file [[brief]]s on Thompson's behalf. Four days before Thompson's scheduled execution, the Ninth Circuit voted 7 to 4 to give him a new trial because of procedural problems in the ''[[en banc]]'' process, which then permitted the court to reach the merits. Kozinski [[Dissenting opinion|dissented]]:<blockquote>If the ''en banc'' call is missed for whatever reason, the error can be corrected in a future case where the problem again manifests itself. ... That this is a capital case does not change the calculus. The stakes are higher in a death case, to be sure, but the stakes for a particular [[litigant]] play no legitimate role in the ''en banc'' process.</blockquote> Kozinski's opinion was criticized by Judge [[Steven Reinhardt]], who called it "bizarre and horrifying" and "unworthy of any jurist."<ref name="bazelon">Bazelon, Emily. [http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-February-2004/feature_bazelon_janfeb04.msp The Big Kozinski]. ''LegalAffairs'', January–February 2004. Retrieved on April 30, 2006.</ref> The judgment was reversed on appeal by the Supreme Court, which called the Ninth Circuit's action "a grave abuse of discretion."<ref>{{cite court
Thomas Martin Thompson had been convicted based largely on the testimony of his fellow inmates, and there were doubts about the effectiveness of his defense counsel that led seven former California prosecutors to file [[brief]]s on Thompson's behalf. Four days before Thompson's scheduled execution, the Ninth Circuit voted 7 to 4 to give him a new trial because of procedural problems in the ''[[en banc]]'' process, which then permitted the court to reach the merits. Kozinski [[Dissenting opinion|dissented]]:<blockquote>If the ''en banc'' call is missed for whatever reason, the error can be corrected in a future case where the problem again manifests itself. ... That this is a capital case does not change the calculus. The stakes are higher in a death case, to be sure, but the stakes for a particular [[litigant]] play no legitimate role in the ''en banc'' process.</blockquote> Kozinski's opinion was criticized by Judge [[Steven Reinhardt]], who called it "bizarre and horrifying" and "unworthy of any jurist."<ref name="bazelon">Bazelon, Emily. [http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-February-2004/feature_bazelon_janfeb04.msp The Big Kozinski]. ''LegalAffairs'', January–February 2004. Retrieved on April 30, 2006.</ref> The judgment was reversed on appeal by the Supreme Court, which called the Ninth Circuit's action "a grave abuse of discretion."<ref>{{cite court

Revision as of 21:00, 30 October 2011

"Kozinski" redirects here. Not to be confused with Kosinski, Kosinsky, or Kaczynski.
Alex Kozinski
Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Incumbent
Assumed office
December 1, 2007
Preceded byMary Schroeder
Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Incumbent
Assumed office
November 7, 1985
Nominated byRonald Reagan
Preceded bySeat established
Personal details
Born (1950-07-23) July 23, 1950 (age 74)
Bucharest, Romania
Alma materUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Alex Kozinski (born July 23, 1950) is Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, an essayist, and a judicial commentator.[1]

Biography

Kozinski was born in Bucharest, Romania. In 1962, when he was 12, his parents, both Holocaust survivors, brought him to the United States. The family settled in the Los Feliz neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, where his father, Moses, ran a small grocery store.

Kozinski graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, receiving an A.B. degree in 1972, and from the UCLA School of Law, receiving a J.D. degree in 1975. Kozinski clerked for future Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Ninth Circuit from 1975 to 1976, and then for Chief Justice Warren Burger from 1976 to 1977. From June 5, 1981 to August 1982, Kozinski served as the first U.S. Special Counsel appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

Judicial career

In 1982, Kozinski was appointed chief judge at the newly formed United States Court of Federal Claims. In 1985, at the age of 35, Kozinski was appointed to a new seat at the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by President Reagan, making him the youngest federal appeals court judge. Defending the court against criticism because of a controversial decision, Kozinski went on record emphasizing judicial independence: "It seems to me that this is what makes this country truly great—that we can have a judiciary where the person who appoints you doesn't own you."[2] He also took a stand against the charge that the Ninth Circuit is overly liberal, which led some to call it "The Notorious Ninth": "I can say with some confidence that cries that the Ninth Circuit is so liberal are just simply misplaced."[3] On November 30, 2007, Kozinski was appointed the tenth chief judge of the Ninth Circuit.[4]

In 2008, according to The Los Angeles Times, Kozinski "maintained a publicly accessible website featuring sexually explicit photos and videos."[5] In response, Kozinski called for an ethics investigation of himself.[6] In July 2009, Kozinski was admonished by a panel headed by Judge Anthony Scirica.[7][8]

Notable cases

  • *Please, your support is needed in a current appeal/case

Benjamin Ayala Lopez Vs. Erick H.Holder Jr., 9th. Circuit Court of Appeals, San Francisco, CA.

Thompson v. Calderon

Thomas Martin Thompson had been convicted based largely on the testimony of his fellow inmates, and there were doubts about the effectiveness of his defense counsel that led seven former California prosecutors to file briefs on Thompson's behalf. Four days before Thompson's scheduled execution, the Ninth Circuit voted 7 to 4 to give him a new trial because of procedural problems in the en banc process, which then permitted the court to reach the merits. Kozinski dissented:

If the en banc call is missed for whatever reason, the error can be corrected in a future case where the problem again manifests itself. ... That this is a capital case does not change the calculus. The stakes are higher in a death case, to be sure, but the stakes for a particular litigant play no legitimate role in the en banc process.

Kozinski's opinion was criticized by Judge Steven Reinhardt, who called it "bizarre and horrifying" and "unworthy of any jurist."[9] The judgment was reversed on appeal by the Supreme Court, which called the Ninth Circuit's action "a grave abuse of discretion."[10]

White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Kozinski dissented from an order rejecting the suggestion for rehearing en banc an appeal filed by Vanna White against Samsung for depicting a robot on a Wheel of Fortune set, in a humorous advertisement. While the Ninth Circuit held in favor of White, Kozinski dissented, stating that "All creators draw in part on the work of those who came before, referring to it, building on it, poking fun at it; we call this creativity, not piracy."[11]

An extended extract from the opinion is widely quoted: "Overprotecting intellectual property is as harmful as underprotecting it. Creativity is impossible without a rich public domain. Nothing today, likely nothing since we tamed fire, is genuinely new: Culture, like science and technology, grows by accretion, each new creator building on the works of those who came before. Overprotection stifles the very creative forces it's supposed to nurture".[12]

Kozinski's dissent in White is also famous for his sarcastic remark that "for better or worse, we are the Court of Appeals for the Hollywood Circuit."

Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.

Main article: Mattel v. MCA Records

Yet another of Kozinski's high-profile cases to date was the lawsuit filed by Mattel against MCA Records, the record label of Danish pop-dance group Aqua, for "turning Barbie into a sex object" in their song "Barbie Girl." Kozinski opened the case with "If this were a sci-fi melodrama, it might be called Speech-Zilla meets Trademark Kong" and famously concluded his opinion with the words: "The parties are advised to chill."[13]

United States v. Isaacs

Kozinski was assigned an obscenity case in which Ira Isaacs is accused of distributing videos depicting bestiality and other images, similar to the 1973 Miller v. California case.[14][15] During the trial, on June 11, 2008, the Los Angeles Times reported that Kozinski had "maintained a publicly accessible Web site featuring sexually explicit photos and videos" at alex.kozinski.com. The Times reported that Kozinski's site included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows, a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal, images of masturbation and public and contortionist sex, a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, a series of photos of women's crotches as seen through snug fitting clothing or underwear, and content with themes of defecation and urination. Kozinski agreed that some of the material was inappropriate, but defended other content as "funny."[16]

Calling the coverage a "baseless smear" by a disgruntled litigant, Stanford University law professor Lawrence Lessig pointed out that the Times had unfairly taken the videos and pictures out of context in its descriptions. He wrote that one frequently mentioned video—the video described above as a "half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal," which actually involves a man running away from a donkey—is available on YouTube,[17] and is not, as is implied by the Times article, an example of bestiality. He also argued that the Kozinski family's right to privacy was violated when the disgruntled litigant exposed the private files which were not intended for public viewing. Lessig compared this to breaking and entering a private residence.[18]

Kozinski initially refused to comment on disqualifying himself,[19] then granted a 48-hour stay after the prosecutor requested time to explore "a potential conflict of interest."[16] On June 13, Kozinski petitioned an ethics panel to investigate his own conduct. He asked Chief Justice John Roberts to assign the inquiry to a panel of judges outside the 9th Circuit's jurisdiction. Also, he said that his son, Yale, and his family or friends may have been responsible for posting some of the material.[20][21]

Kozinski had previously been involved in a dispute over government monitoring of federal court employees’ computers. Administrative Office head Ralph Mecham dropped the monitoring program, but protested in the press.[22]

On June 15, 2008, it was reported that Kozinski had recused himself from the case.[23]

On June 5, 2009, the Judicial Council of the Third Circuit issued an opinion clearing Kozinski of any wrongdoing.[24]

Essayist

Kozinski has won admirers across the political spectrum who praise his "common sense" decisions, his libertarian instinct, and his sense of humor.[1] His essays have been featured in publications such as Slate, The New Yorker, The New Republic and National Review.[citation needed]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b David A. Golden (1992), Humor, the Law, and Judge Kozinski's Greatest Hits, Brigham Young University Law Review: 513.[dead link]
  2. ^ Online NewsHour: Debate Brews over Splitting 9th Circuit Court - January 17, 2005
  3. ^ Michaels, Spencer (January 17, 2005). Controversial Court. NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.
  4. ^ Gavel Passing to Mark Changing of the Guard for Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States Courts for the Ninth Circuit Public Information Office news release, November 23, 2007.
  5. ^ "9th Circuit's chief judge posted sexually explicit matter on his website". The Los Angeles Times. June 11, 2008.
  6. ^ Slater, Dan (June 17, 2008). "CJ Roberts Assigns East Coast Judges to Kozinski Investigation". The Wall Street Journal.
  7. ^ "L.A. Now". The Los Angeles Times. July 2, 2009.
  8. ^ Panel Decision
  9. ^ Bazelon, Emily. The Big Kozinski. LegalAffairs, January–February 2004. Retrieved on April 30, 2006.
  10. ^ Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 542 (1998).
  11. ^ White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 989 F.2d 1512, 1512 (9th Cir. 1993) (en banc).
  12. ^ http://www2.bc.edu/~yen/Torts/Vanna%20White%20Koz%20ed.pdf
  13. ^ Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 908 (9th Cir. 2002).
  14. ^ Kim Zetter (2008-06-11). "Chief Judge in Obscenity Case Caught Posting Porn". WIRED.
  15. ^ USLaw (2008-08-11). "What "Stuff" was on Judge Kozinski's Personal Website?". Celebrity Justice.
  16. ^ a b Scott Glover (2008-06-11). "9th Circuit's chief judge posted sexually explicit matter on his website". Los Angeles Times.
  17. ^ Donkey Rapes Man on YouTube
  18. ^ Lessig, Lawrence (June 12, 2008). The Kozinski mess.
  19. ^ Adam Liptak, "Calif. Trial Focuses on Pornography: Los Angeles Jury Will Decide If Videos Are Obscene," New York Times, June 12, 2008, A21.
  20. ^ Associated Press (June 13, 2008). California: Judge Calls for Inquiry Into His Conduct Over Web Site.
  21. ^ Blood, Michael R. (June 13, 2008). ap.google.com, Calif judge wants panel to probe his porn postings, Associated Press.
  22. ^ Slater, Dan (June 11, 2008). "A Look Back at Judge Kozinski's Attack on Monitoring Court Computers". The Wall Street Journal.
  23. ^ eFluxMedia report
  24. ^ Jones, Ashby (July 2, 2009). "A 'Pleased' Kozinski Cleared of Wrongdoing". WSJ Law Blog. Retrieved September 20, 2011.

Sources

Wikiquote has quotations related to Alex Kozinski.
Legal offices
New seat Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1985–present 		Incumbent
Preceded by Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
2007–present

Template:Persondata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alex_Kozinski&oldid=458187359"