Page semi-protected

Basic income

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Basic income grant)
Jump to: navigation, search
On 4 October 2013, Swiss activists from Generation Grundeinkommen organized a performance in Bern in which roughly 8 million coins, one coin representing one person out of Switzerland's population, were dumped on a public square. This was done in celebration of the successful collection of more than 125,000 signatures, forcing the government to hold a referendum on whether or not to incorporate the concept of basic income in the Federal constitution. The measure did not pass, with 76.9% voting against basic income.[1]

A basic income (also called basic income guarantee, citizen's income, unconditional basic income, universal basic income (UBI), or universal demogrant) is a form of social security in which all citizens or residents of a country receive a regular, unconditional sum of money, either from a government or some other public institution, independent of any other income.[2][3][4] An unconditional income transfer that is considered insufficient to meet a person's basic needs (or below the poverty line), is sometimes called a partial basic income, while one at or greater than that level is sometimes called a full basic income. Besides national basic income, full or partial, it can also be local or regional basic income. Some welfare systems are more or less related to basic income but also have some strings and/or are restricted to "The poor" in a region. Bolsa Familia in Brasil is a well-known example.

Basic income systems that are financed by the profits of publicly owned enterprises (often called social dividend, also known as citizen's dividend) are major components in many proposed models of market socialism.[5] Basic income schemes have also been promoted within the context of capitalist systems, where they would be financed through various forms of taxation.[6]

Similar proposals for "capital grants provided at the age of majority" date to Thomas Paine's Agrarian Justice of 1795, there paired with asset-based egalitarianism. The phrase "social dividend" was commonly used as a synonym for basic income in the English-speaking world before 1986, after which the phrase "basic income" gained widespread currency.[7]

Prominent advocates of the concept include André Gorz, Ailsa McKay,[8] Guy Standing, Karl Widerquist, Hillel Steiner, Peter Vallentyne and Philippe Van Parijs.[9][10]


The idea of an unconditional basic income, given to all citizens in a state (or all adult citizens), was firstly presented near the middle of the 19th century. But long before that there were ideas of a so-called minimum income, the idea of a one-off grant and the idea of a social insurance (which still is a key feature of all modern welfare states, with insurances for and against unemployment, sickness, parenthood, accidents, old age and so forth).

The minimum income, the idea to eradicate poverty by targeting the poor, is in contradiction with basic income given "to all", but nevertheless share some underlying ideas about the state's or the city's welfare responsibilities towards its citizens. Johannes Ludovicus Vives (1492–1540), for example, proposed that the municipal government should be responsible for securing a subsistence minimum to all its residents, "not on grounds of justice but for the sake of a more effective exercise of morally required charity". However, to be entitled poor relief the person’s poverty must not, he argued, be undeserved, but he or she must "deserve the help he gets by proving his willingness to work."[11]

The first to develop the idea of a social insurance was Marquis de Condorcet (1743–1794). After having played a prominent role in the French revolution he was imprisoned and sentenced to death. While in prison, he wrote the Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain (published posthumously by his widow in 1795), whose last chapter described his vision of a social insurance and how he foresaw how it could reduce inequality, insecurity and poverty. Marquis de Condorcet also mentioned, very briefly, the idea of a benefit to all children old enough to start working by themselves and to start up a family of their own. He is not known to have said or written anything else on this proposal, but his close friend and fellow member of the Convention Thomas Paine (1737–1809) developed the idea much further, a couple of years after Condorcet’s death.

The first time in history that some kind of social movement for basic income developed were around 1920 in United Kingdom. Authors that contributed to this movement was among others Bertrand Russel, Dennis Milner (with wife) and Clifford H. Douglas.

  • Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) argued for a new social model that combined the advantages of socialism and anarchism, and that basic income should be a vital component in that new society.
  • Dennis Milner, a Quaker and a Labour Party member, published jointly with his wife Mabel, a short pamphlet entitled “Scheme for a State Bonus” (1918). There they argued for the "introduction of an income paid unconditionally on a weekly basis to all citizens of the United Kingdom". They considered it a moral right for everyone to have the means to subsistence, and thus it should not be conditional upon working or willingness to work.
  • Douglas was an ingenier who became concerned about the dilemma with a rising productivity, which he observed in the British industry, and a people who could not afford to buy all the goods that were produced. His solution to this were a new social system which he called Social Credit, in short a combination of monetary reform and basic income.

In 1944 and 1945 the Beveridge Committee, led by the British economist Beveridge, developed a proposal for a comprehensive new welfare system. Basic income was not part of this system, it was rather a combination of social insurance and selective grants, but Lady Rhys-Williams, who was a member of the Committee, argued in that direction. She is also considered to be the first to develop the negative income tax-model.[12][13]

In the 1960s and 1970s there were a welfare debate in United States and Canada in which basic income were a part. Six pilot projects were also conducted at the time, not with "basic income equal to all", but with the related negative income tax-system. The American president of the time, Richard Nixon, at one point even proposed a negative income tax in a bill to the Congress. But the Congress eventually only approved to a guaranteed income for the elderly and the disabled, not as a citizen right for all.[14]

Towards the end of the 1970s and throughout the 1980s, when the basic income-idea was already forgotten in the United States, the idea started to gain attraction in Europe. Basic Income European Network, later renamed to Basic Income Earth Network, was founded in 1986 and started to arrange international conferences every other year. To some extent there were also, from the 1980s, people outside the party politics and the universities who took interest in the question. In West Germany, for example, groups of unemployed people became interested and took a stance for the reform.[15]

From 2005-2010 and onwards basic income has become a more hot topic in many countries. Several countries have tried or is about to try local experiments with basic income, or welfare systems related to basic income. There has also been a national referendum on basic income, in Switzerland 2016. It was rejected though, with 73 percent voting no to the proposal. In the 2010th basic income have especially been discussed in the context of the ongoing automation. Often with the argument that the automation and robotisation will mean that there will be less paid jobs in the future, and hence the need for a new welfare model.

Policy aspects (except the economic aspects)

Transparency and administrative efficiency

Basic income is potentially a much simpler and more transparent welfare system than the one existing in the welfare states around the world today.[16] Instead of having numerous welfare programs, it would simply be one universal unconditional income. This strategy for introducing basic income is controversial because some basic income supporters argue that it should be added to the existing welfare system rather than a replacement for it. The lack of means test or similar administration would allow for some saving on social welfare, which could be put towards the grant. The Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN) describes one of the benefits of a basic income as having a lower overall cost than that of the current means-tested social welfare benefits, and they have put forth proposals for implementation that they claim to be financially viable.[17][18]

Poverty reduction

Basic income is often argued for by its advocates because of its potential to reduce poverty, or even eradicate poverty.[19]


Philippe Van Parijs

Several advocates of basic income have argued that basic income promotes freedom. These are three of the main arguments:

  • Right-leaning supporters have argued that policies like basic income free welfare recipients from the paternalistic oversight of conditional welfare-state policies.[citation needed]
  • Philippe Van Parijs has argued that basic income at the highest sustainable level is needed to support real freedom, or the freedom to do whatever one "might want to do."[20] By this, Van Parijs means that all people should be free to use the resources of the Earth and the "external assets" people make out of them to do whatever they might want to do. Money is like an access ticket to use those resources, and so to make people equally free to do what they might want to do with the external assets of the world, the government should give each individual as many such access tickets as possible—that is, the highest sustainable basic income.
  • Some supporters[weasel words] have argued that basic income is needed to protect the power to say no, which these supporters argue is essential to an individual's status as a free person. If some other group of people controls resources necessary to an individual's survival, that individual has no reasonable choice other than to do whatever the resource-controlling group demands. Before the establishment of governments and landlords, individuals had direct access to the resources they needed to survive. But today, resources necessary to the production of food, shelter, and clothing have been privatized in such a way that some have gotten a share and others have not. Therefore, this argument goes, the owners of those resources owe compensation back to non-owners, sufficient at least for them to purchase the resources or goods necessary to sustain their basic needs. This redistribution must be unconditional because people can consider themselves free only if they are not forced to spend all their time doing the bidding of others simply to provide basic necessities to themselves and their families.[21] Under this argument, personal, political, and religious freedom are worth little without the power to say no. In this view, basic income provides an economic freedom, which—combined with political freedom, freedom of belief, and personal freedom—establish each individual's status as a free person.

Work incentives and employment

There is also a belief among critics that if people have free and unconditional money, they will not work (as much) and get lazy.[22][23][24] Less work means less tax revenue and hence less money for the state and cities to fund public projects. There are also concerns that some people will spend their basic income on alcohol and drugs.[21][25]

If there is a disincentive to employment because of basic income, it is however expected that the magnitude of such a disincentive would depend on how generous the basic income were to be. Some campaigners in Switzerland have suggested a level that would only just be liveable, arguing that people would want to supplement it.[26]

Tim Worstall, a writer and blogger, has argued that traditional welfare schemes create a disincentive to work, because such schemes typically cause people to lose benefits at around the same rate that their income rises (a form of welfare trap where the marginal tax rate is 100 percent). He has asserted that this particular disincentive is not a property shared by basic income, as the rate of increase is positive at all incomes.[27]

In one study, even when the benefits are not permanent, the hours worked by the recipients of the benefit are observed to decline by 5 percent, a decrease of two hours in a typical 40-hour work week:

"While experiments have been conducted in the United States and Canada, those participating knew that their benefits were not permanent and, consequently, they were not likely to change their behaviour as much or in the same manner had the GAI been ongoing. As a result, total hours worked fell by about five percent on average. The work reduction was largest for second earners in two-earner households and weakest for the main earner. Further, the negative work effect was higher the more generous the benefit level."[23]

However, in studies of the Mincome experiment in rural Dauphin, Manitoba, in the 1970s, the only two groups who worked significantly less were new mothers and teenagers working to support their families. New mothers spent this time with their infant children, and working teenagers put significant additional time into their schooling.[28] Under Mincome, "the reduction of work effort was modest: about one per cent for men, three per cent for wives, and five per cent for unmarried women."[29]

Another study that contradicted such decline in work incentive was a pilot project implemented in 2008 and 2009 in the Namibian village of Omitara; the assessment of the project after its conclusion found that economic activity actually increased, particularly through the launch of small businesses, and reinforcement of the local market by increasing households' buying power.[30] However, the residents of Omitara were described as suffering "dehumanising levels of poverty" before the introduction of the pilot, and as such the project's relevance to potential implementations in developed economies is unknown.[31]

James Meade states that a return to full employment can only be achieved if, among other things, workers offer their services at a low enough price that the required wage for unskilled labor would be too low to generate a socially desirable distribution of income. He therefore concludes that a "citizen's income" is necessary to achieve full employment without suffering stagnant or negative growth in wages.[32]

Economic aspects (beyond the work incentives)

Erik Olin Wright, 2013.

Economists and sociologists have advocated a form of basic income as a means for distributing the economic profits of publicly owned enterprises to benefit the entire population (also referred to as a social dividend), where the basic income payment represents the return to each citizen on the capital owned by society. These systems would be directly financed out of returns on publicly owned assets and are featured as major components of many models of market socialism.[5]

Erik Olin Wright characterizes basic income as a project for reforming capitalism into an economic system by empowering labor in relation to capital, granting labor greater bargaining power with employers in labor markets, which can gradually de-commodify labor by decoupling work from income. This would allow for an expansion in scope of the "social economy", by granting citizens greater means to pursue activities (such as the pursuit of the arts) that do not yield strong financial returns.[33]

James Meade advocated for a social dividend scheme to be funded by publicly owned productive assets.[34] Russell argued for a basic income alongside public ownership as a means to decrease the average length of the working day and to achieve full employment.[35]

Fox Piven holds the view that an income guarantee would benefit all workers by liberating them from the anxiety that results from the "tyranny of wage slavery" and provide opportunities for people to pursue different occupations and develop untapped potentials for creativity.[36] Gorz saw basic income as a necessary adaptation to the increasing automation of work, but also a way to overcome the alienation in work and life and to increase the amount of leisure time available to each individual.[37]

Harry Shutt proposed basic income along with reforms to make all or most of the enterprises collective in nature, rather than private. Together, he argued, these measures would constitute the make-up of a post-capitalist economic system.[38]


Basic income and growth (or BIG) allows for potential economic growth: people may decide to invest in themselves to earn higher degrees and get interesting and well-paid jobs that, in turn, could trigger growth.[39][21] As Jason Burke Murphy argues, a substantial discussion has grown over recent years about whether basic income could be a part of a larger degrowth movement.[40]


The affordability of a basic income proposal relies on many factors such as the costs of any public services it replaces, tax increases required, and less tangible auxiliary effects on government revenue and/or spending (for example a successful basic income scheme may reduce crime, thereby reducing required expenditure on policing and justice.)[citation needed]

The case for basic income affordability can be summarized[citation needed] this way:

  • Welfare substitution: Basic income would substitute to a wide range of existing social welfare programmes, tax rebates, state subsidies and work activation spendings. All those budgets (including administrative costs) would be reallocated to finance basic income.[citation needed]
  • Auto-financing of basic income: although basic income is paid to everyone universally, people whose earnings are above the mean income are in fact net contributors to the basic income scheme, mainly through an income tax. In practice this means that the net cost of basic income is much lower than the raw cost calculated as a sum of monthly payments to the whole population.[citation needed]
  • More fiscal redistribution: in addition to reforming and optimizing the existing tax systems, additional taxations can be implemented to fully finance a basic income scheme. Some proposals frequently mention to this effect the need for a tax on capital, carbon tax, financial transaction tax etc. which do not currently exist in most jurisdictions.[citation needed]
  • Money creation: In addition to tax reforms, the power of central banks to create money could be used as one funding channel for basic income; conjugation of basic income and monetary taxation is called Social credit, an alternative system to the quantitative easing, is proposed by the distributive movement.[citation needed]

A 2012 affordability study done in the Republic of Ireland by Social Justice Ireland found that basic income would be affordable with a 45 percent income tax rate. This would lead to an improvement in income for the majority of the population.[41]

Charles M.A. Clark estimates that the United States could support a Basic Income large enough to eliminate poverty and continue to fund all current government spending (except that which would be made redundant by the Basic Income) with a flat income tax of just under 39 percent.[42]

Paul Mason stated that universal basic income would increase social security costs, but that it would also reduce the high medical costs associated with diseases of poverty, by reducing stress, diseases like high blood pressure, type II diabetes etc. would become less common.[43]

Financial source

Amount to paying the basic income may come from:

Taxation or fee

Increase money supply

Common ownership

Integration of social welfare

These manners saves the cost and diverted as a form of source for paying basic income

  • Integration of current social welfare or social insurance, include income support, unemployment support, subsidies, pensions and etc.
  • reduced bureaucracy, reduce cost of personnel and raise effective, it is cost and waste by means test and eligibility checking for a welfare, including documents, staff, offices, places cost and other consumption.
  • Reduce and eliminate concession and subsides for a few of peoples and legal entity only.
  • Elimination of current income support programs and tax deductions.
  • Repayment of the grant at death or retirement.
  • Replaces minimum wage to avoid the disadvantages[49]


Georgist views

Geolibertarians seek to synthesize propertarian libertarianism and a geoist (or Georgist) philosophy of land as unowned commons or equally owned by all people, citing the classical economic distinction between unimproved land and private property. The rental value of land is produced by the labors of the community and, as such, rightly belongs to the community at large and not solely to the landholder.

A land value tax (LVT) is levied as an annual fee for exclusive access to a section of earth, which is collected and redistributed to the community either through public goods, such as public security or a court system, or in the form of a basic guaranteed income called a citizen's dividend. Geolibertarians view the LVT as a single tax to replace all other methods of taxation, which are deemed unjust violations of the non-aggression principle.

Right-wing views

Support for basic income has been expressed by several people associated with right-wing political views. While adherents of such views generally favor minimization or abolition of the public provision of welfare services, some have cited basic income as a viable strategy to reduce the amount of bureaucratic administration that is prevalent in many contemporary welfare systems. Others have contended that it could also act as a form of compensation for fiat currency inflation.[50][51][52]

Feminist views

Feminists' views on the basic income can be loosely divided into two opposing views: one view which supports basic income, seeing it as a way of guaranteeing a minimum financial independence for women, and recognizing women's unpaid work in the home; and another view which opposes basic income, seeing it as having the potential to discourage women from participating in the workforce, and to reinforce traditional gender roles of women belonging in the private area and men in the public area.[53][54]


Concerns about automation have caused many in the high-tech industry to turn to basic income proposals as a necessary implication of their business models. Many in the tech industry believe automation (along with other things) is creating technological unemployment.

Journalist Nathan Schneider first highlighted the turn of the "tech elite" to these ideas with an article in Vice magazine, which cited figures such as Marc Andreessen, Sam Altman, Peter Diamandis, and others.[55] The White House, in a report to Congress, has put the probability at 83% that a worker making less than $20 an hour in 2010 will eventually lose their job to a machine. Even workers making as much as $40 an hour face odds of 31 percent.[56]

The need for a universal basic income is becoming more apparent as the world makes strides in technological advancement. The impending damage that will be dealt with the economy will be far reaching and affect many people. With a rising unemployment rate, poverty stricken communities will become more impoverished and cause a decline in livelihood worldwide. By implementing a universal basic income, we could do away with many current world problems like high work stress, and give life to more opportunity and efficient and effective work. It has been shown in studies that basic income has many positive impacts on communities it has been tested on. In a study on basic income in the city of Dauphin, Manitoba, only 13% of labor decreased from a much higher expected number.[57] In another study in several Indian villages, basic income in the region raised the education rate of young people by 25%.[58]

Although the fear of technological unemployment has been a major cause of the recent increase in support for basic income, some tech-industry experts are worried more that automation will destabilize the labor market or that it will increase economic inequality than that it will cause increasing levels of unemployment. For example, Chris Hughes, co-founder of both Facebook and Economic Security Project, does not stress technological unemployment in his arguments for basic income.

Automation has been happening for hundreds of years. It has not yet caused declining levels of employment but it has displaced workers who spend their lives building up skills just to see them outmoded and find themselves forced into the unskilled labor market. Technological unemployment is a future fear, but automation-based employment instability has been around since before the Luddite movement gave it a name in the early 1800s.

Paul Vallée, a Canadian tech-entrepreneur and CEO of Pythian argues that automation is at least as likely to increase poverty and reduce social mobility than it is to create ever-increasing levels of unemployment. At the 2016 North American Basic Income Guarantee Congress in Winnipeg, Vallée examined slavery as a historical example of a period in which capital (African slaves) could do the same things that human labor (poor whites) could do. He found that slavery did not cause massive unemployment among poor whites, but instead increased economic inequality and lowered social mobility.[59]

Non-basic income responses to automation-related employment instability

To better address both the funding concerns and concerns about government control, one alternative model is that the cost and control would be distributed across the private sector instead of the public sector. Companies across the economy would be required to employ humans, but the job descriptions would be left to private innovation, and individuals would have to compete to be hired and retained.

This would be a for-profit sector analog of basic income, that is, a market-based form of basic income. It differs from a job guarantee in that the government is not the employer (rather, companies are) and there is no aspect of having employees who "cannot be fired", a problem that interferes with economic dynamism. The economic salvation in this model is not that every individual is guaranteed a job, but rather just that enough jobs exist that massive unemployment is avoided and employment is no longer solely the privilege of only the very smartest or highly trained 20% of the population.

Another option for a market-based form of basic income has been proposed by the Center for Economic and Social Justice (CESJ) as part of "a Just Third Way" (a Third Way with greater justice) through widely distributed power and liberty. Called the Capital Homestead Act, it is reminiscent of James S. Albus's Peoples' Capitalism in that money creation and securities ownership are widely and directly distributed to individuals rather than flowing through, or being concentrated in, centralized or elite mechanisms.[60][61][62]


Discussion of a basic income can be found both in the economics literature and in public policy debates in the political arena.

Economics research

Major Western economies today are managed to maintain a large army of unemployed to discipline the demands of labor, which they believe would increase inflation. A primary tool in this regard is the NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment): The theory is that unemployment below that level will presumably drive up inflation.[citation needed]

Proponents of modern monetary theory recommend a job guarantee as an alternative.[citation needed]

Daron Acemoglu, has expressed doubts on basic income with the following statement: "Current US status quo is horrible. A more efficient and generous social safety net is needed. But UBI is expensive and not generous enough."[63] Eric Maskin has stated that "a minimum income makes sense, but not at the cost of eliminating Social Security and Medicare".[64] 

The Economist notes that raising the income floor would have no impact on the wealth gap. While cash transfers would make the most difference to those on the bottom of the pile, they posit it would be instead of existing welfare benefits.[65]

Political debate

A commission of the German parliament discussed basic income in 2013 and concluded that it is "unrealizable" because:

  • it would cause a significant decrease in the motivation to work among citizens, with unpredictable consequences for the national economy
  • it would require a complete restructuring of the taxation, social insurance and pension systems, which will cost a significant amount of money
  • the current system of social help in Germany is regarded as more effective because it is more personalized: the amount of help provided is not fixed and depends on the financial situation of the person; for some socially vulnerable groups the basic income could be insufficient
  • it would cause a vast increase in immigration
  • it would cause a rise in the shadow economy
  • the corresponding rise of taxes would cause more inequality: higher taxes would translate into higher prices of everyday products, harming the finances of poor people
  • no viable way to finance basic income in Germany was found[66][67]


Omitara, one of the two poor villages in Namibia where a local basic income was tested in 2008–2009.

Discussion of what eventually came to be called basic income began with scattered writers in Britain and the United States in the first half of the twentieth century. The idea gained strength in United States and Canada in the 1960s and 1970s, not least among economists, but disappeared from the political scene in the 1980s (when the politicians chose to implement the earned income tax credit instead). In the 1980s, however, the discussion had also begun in Europe. It was a somewhat fringe debate in the beginning, but it continued and grew gradually in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Following the 2009 financial crisis, basic income has seen a significant rise in prominence around the world. The debate has now broadened to most of the developed world, to Latin America, Middle East, and to at least some countries in Africa and Asia. Several countries are also preparing or are already running basic income pilots.[citation needed]

Pilot programs

As of 2017, there are no well established and ongoing basic income programs. However, many countries have well established cash transfer assistance programs that are means tested or provide for less than basic needs. For example, the Permanent Fund of Alaska in the United States provides a relatively small cash "oil dividend" to nearly all state residents, and the Bolsa Família program in Brazil provides means-tested partial assistance to the poor. Additionally, several other countries have tested, implemented, or begun planning the following basic income experiments:

  • Experiments with negative income tax in United States and Canada in the 1960s and 1970s.
  • A town in Manitoba, Canada experimented with a basic guaranteed income in the 1970s[68]
  • The Basic Income Grant (BIG) in Namibia, launched in 2008[69]
  • An independent pilot implemented in São Paulo, Brazil[70]
  • Several villages in India participated in basic income trial,[71] while the government has proposed a guaranteed basic income for all citizens.[72]
  • The GiveDirectly experiment in Nairobi, Kenya, which is the biggest and longest basic income pilot as of 2017.[73]
  • The city of Utrecht in the Netherlands launched an experiment in early 2017 that is testing different rates of aid.[72]
  • Ontario, Canada will implement a basic income trial in summer 2017.[74]
  • The Finnish government implemented a two-year pilot in January 2017 involving 2,000 subjects.[75]
  • Eight, a nonprofit organisation, launched a project in a village in Fort Portal, Uganda in January 2017, providing income for 56 adults and 88 children through mobile money.[76]



The United States and Canada

Asia, Africa, Latin America, Oceania

Historical advocates

  • Thomas Paine, a philosopher who ranks as one of the "founding fathers" of the United States, advocated a capital grant and an unconditional citizens pension.[121]
  • Thomas Spence was apparently the first to layout in full what is now called a universal basic income.[121]
  • British philosopher Bertrand Russell outlined the idea without giving it a name in 1918.[122]
  • Civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. endorsed it under the name of "the guaranteed income" shortly before his assassination.[123]

Petitions, polls and referendums

  • 2008: an official petition for basic income was started in Germany by Susanne Wiest.[124] The petition was accepted and Susanne Wiest was invited for a hearing at the German parliament's Commission of Petitions. After the hearing, the petition was closed as "unrealizable".[66]
  • 2015: a citizen's initiative in Spain received 185,000 signatures, short of the required amount for the proposal to be discussed in parliament.[125]
  • 2016: The world's first universal basic income referendum in Switzerland on 5 June 2016 was rejected with a 76.9 percent majority.[1][126] Also in 2016 a poll showed that 58 percent of the European people are aware of basic income and 65 percent would vote in favor of the idea.[127]


Some researchers have hastened to add that basic income should be viewed as capital—not just as money. In the future basic income could thus be distributed as access to things like energy, AI, 3D printing or robots.[128]

See also


  1. ^ a b "Vorlage Nr. 601 – Vorläufige amtliche Endergebnisse". Retrieved 28 July 2016. 
  2. ^ "Improving Social Security in Canada Guaranteed Annual Income: A Supplementary Paper". Government of Canada. 1994. Retrieved 30 November 2013. 
  3. ^ "History of Basic Income". Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN). Archived from the original on 21 June 2008. 
  4. ^ Universal Basic Income: A Review Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Accessed August 6, 2017.
  5. ^ a b Marangos, John (2003). "Social Dividend versus Basic Income Guarantee in Market Socialism". International Journal of Political Economy. 34 (3). JSTOR 40470892. 
  6. ^ Arneson, Richard J. (April 1992). Is Socialism Dead? A Comment on Market Socialism and Basic Income Capitalism. 102. Ethics. pp. 485–511. JSTOR 2381836. 
  7. ^ van Trier, Walter (1 April 1989). "Who framed social dividend? A tale of the unexpected". University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics. Retrieved 28 July 2016. 
  8. ^ McKay, Ailsa (2001). "Rethinking Work and Income Maintenance Policy: Promoting Gender Equality Through a Citizens' Basic Income". Feminist Economics. 7 (1): 97–118. doi:10.1080/13545700010022721. 
  9. ^ Ralph Nader Radio Hour, KPFK 90.7 FM, Los Angeles, California. Aired Saturday, June 4th, 2016.
  10. ^ Jimmy Dore Show, KPFK 90.7 FM, Los Angeles, California, Aired Friday, April 10th, 2017.
  11. ^ History of Basic Income Basic Income Earth Network
  12. ^ Sloman, Peter (2015). Beveridge's rival: Juliet Rhys-Williams and the campaign for basic income, 1942-55 (PDF) (Report). New College, Oxford. Retrieved 26 April 2017. 
  13. ^ Fitzpatrick, Tony (1999). Freedom and Security: an introduction to the basic income debate (1. publ. ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-312-22313-7. 
  14. ^ "American President: Richard Milhous Nixon: Domestic Affairs". Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia. Retrieved 2010-04-28. 
  15. ^ Ronald Blaschke The basic income debate in Germany and some basic reflections (läst 13 december 2012)
  16. ^ Standing, Guy. "How Cash Transfers Promote the Case for Basic Income". Basic Income Studies. 3 (1). doi:10.2202/1932-0183.1106. ISSN 1932-0183. 
  17. ^ "BIEN: frequently asked questions". Basic Income Earth Network. Retrieved 24 July 2013. 
  18. ^ "Research". Basic Income Earth Network. Retrieved 24 July 2013. 
  19. ^ Bregman, Rutger (6 March 2017). "Utopian thinking: the easy way to eradicate poverty – Rutger Bregman" – via 
  20. ^ "A Basic Income for All". Retrieved 2016-12-14. 
  21. ^ a b c Sheahen, Allan. Basic Income Guarantee: Your Right to Economic Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Book. 29 March 2016.
  22. ^ "urn:nbn:se:su:diva-7385: Just Distribution : Rawlsian Liberalism and the Politics of Basic Income". Retrieved 16 February 2014. 
  23. ^ a b Gilles Séguin. "Improving Social Security in Canada – Guaranteed Annual Income: A Supplementary Paper, Government of Canada, 1994". Retrieved 16 August 2013. 
  24. ^ The Need for Basic Income: An Interview with Philippe Van Parijs, Imprints, Vol. 1, No. 3 (March 1997). The interview was conducted by Christopher Bertram.
  25. ^ Koga, Kenya. "Pennies From Heaven." Economist 409.8859 (2013): 67–68. Academic Search Complete. Web. 12 April 2016.
  26. ^ Wolf Chiappella. "Tim Harford — Article — A universal income is not such a silly idea". Tim Harford. Retrieved 28 July 2016. 
  27. ^ Worstall, Tim (12 July 2013). "Forbes article". Forbes. 
  28. ^ Belik, Vivian (5 September 2011). "A Town Without Poverty? Canada's only experiment in guaranteed income finally gets reckoning". Retrieved 16 August 2013. 
  29. ^ A guaranteed annual income: From Mincome to the millennium (PDF) Derek Hum and Wayne Simpson
  30. ^ "Basic Income Grant Coalition: Pilot Project". BIG Coalition Namibia. Retrieved 24 July 2013. 
  31. ^ "Otjivero residents to get bridging allowance as BIG pilot ends". Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 28 July 2016. 
  32. ^ Meade, James Edward. Full Employment Regained?, Cambridge University Press, 1995, ISBN 0-521-55697-X
  33. ^ Wright, Erik Olin. "Basic Income as a Socialist Project," paper presented at the annual US-BIG Congress, 4–6 March 2005 (University of Wisconsin, March 2005).
  34. ^ "Basic Income". Media Hell. Retrieved 9 December 2012. 
  35. ^ Russell, Bertrand. Roads to Freedom. Socialism, Anarchism and Syndicalism, London: Unwin Books (1918), pp. 80–81 and 127
  36. ^ Frances Goldin, Debby Smith, Michael Smith (2014). Imagine: Living in a Socialist USA. Harper Perennial. ISBN 0-06-230557-3 p. 132.
  37. ^ André Gorz, Pour un revenu inconditionnel suffisant, published in Transversales/Science-Culture (n° 3, 3e trimestre 2002) (in French)
  38. ^ Shutt, Harry (15 March 2010). Beyond the Profits System: Possibilities for the Post-Capitalist Era. Zed Books. p. 124. ISBN 978-1-84813-417-1. a flat rate payment as of right to all resident citizens over the school leaving age, irrespective of means of employment would in principle replace all existing social-security entitlements with the exception of child benefits. 
  39. ^ Tanner, Michael. "The Pros and Cons of a Guaranteed National Income." Policy Analysis. CATO institute, 12 May 2015, Web. 2 March 7, 2016.
  40. ^ "Basic Income, sustainable consumption and the 'DeGrowth' movement | BIEN". BIEN. 2016-08-13. Retrieved 2016-12-14. 
  41. ^ "Basic Income – Why and how in difficult economic times : Financing a BI in Ireland" (PDF). Social Justice Ireland. 14 September 2012. 
  42. ^ Clarck, Charles M.A. "PROMOTING ECONOMIC EQUITY IN A 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY: THE BASIC INCOME SOLUTION" (PDF). USBIG Discussion Paper. Retrieved 14 December 2016. 
  43. ^ Talks at Google (3 March 2016). "Paul Mason: 'PostCapitalism' – Talks at Google". Retrieved 28 July 2016 – via YouTube. 
  44. ^ Clinton, Doug. "A Universal Basic Income For When the Robots Come". 
  45. ^ On the Economic Theory of Socialism, by Lange, Oskar. 1936. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1: "It seems, therefore, convenient to regard the income of consumers as being composed of two parts: one part being the receipts for the labour services performed and the other part being a social dividend constituting the individual's share in the income derived from the capital and the natural resources owned by society."
  46. ^ Farley, Martin (20 April 2016). "Why Land Value Tax and Universal Basic Income Need each other". 
  47. ^ "From basic income to social dividend: sharing the value of common resources – Share The World's Resources (STWR)". 
  48. ^ "Basic Income as a Strategy to Promote the Georgist Movement, by Karl Widerquist, Ph.D. -". 
  49. ^ "Minimum Wages vs. Universal Basic Income" /HuffPost. 18 August 2015.
  50. ^ Dolan, Ed (27 January 2014). "A Universal Basic Income: Conservative, Progressive, and Libertarian Perspectives". EconoMonitor. Retrieved 29 September 2014. 
  51. ^ Weisenthal, Joe (13 May 2013). "There's A Way To Give Everyone In America An Income That Conservatives And Liberals Can Both Love". Business Insider. Retrieved 29 September 2014. 
  52. ^ Gordon, Noah (6 August 2014). "The Conservative Case for a Guaranteed Basic Income". The Atlantic. Retrieved 29 September 2014. 
  53. ^ Kaori Katada. "Basic Income and Feminism: in terms of "the gender division of labor"" (PDF). 
  54. ^ Caitlin McLean (September 2015). "Beyond Care: Expanding the Feminist Debate on Universal Basic Income" (PDF). WiSE. 
  55. ^ Schneider, Nathan (6 January 2015). "Why the Tech Elite Is Getting Behind Universal Basic Income". Vice. 
  56. ^ whitehouse
  57. ^ Forget, Evelyn L. "The Town With No Poverty." Duke University. N.p., Feb. 2011. Web. 26 July 2017. <>.
  58. ^ Abhishek Roy. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 July 2017. <>.
  59. ^ "Paul Vallee, Basic Income, for publication". Google Docs. Retrieved 2017-05-28. 
  60. ^ Center for Economic & Social Justice, Capital Homestead Act Summary 
  61. ^ James S. Albus, Peoples' Capitalism: The Economics of the Robot Revolution (free download)
  62. ^ James S. Albus, People's Capitalism main website
  63. ^ "Majority of Economists Surveyed Are against the Universal Basic Income". Retrieved 28 July 2016. 
  64. ^ "Poll Results | IGM Forum". Retrieved 28 July 2016. 
  65. ^ "The cheque is in the mail". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 28 July 2016. 
  66. ^ a b "Deutscher Bundestag – Problematische Auswirkungen auf Arbeitsanreize" (in German). Retrieved 5 June 2016. 
  67. ^ "Petitionen: Verwendung von Cookies nicht aktiviert" (PDF). 
  68. ^ "Innovation series: Does the gig economy mean 'endless possibilities' or the death of jobs?". 8 October 2016. 
  69. ^ Krahe, Dialika. "How a Basic Income Program Saved a Namibian Village". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 9 June 2017. 
  70. ^ "BRAZIL: Basic Income in Quatinga Velho celebrates 3-years of operation | BIEN". Retrieved 5 June 2016. 
  71. ^ "INDIA: Basic Income Pilot Project Finds Positive Results," Archived February 9, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. Basic Income News, BIEN (22 September 2012)
  72. ^ a b Tognini, Giacomo. "Universal Basic Income, 5 Experiments From Around The World". WorldCrunch. Retrieved 10 June 2017. 
  73. ^ Mathews, Dylan. "This Kenyan village is a laboratory for the biggest basic income experiment ever". Vox. Retrieved 10 June 2017. 
  74. ^ Kassam, Ashifa. "Ontario plans to launch universal basic income trial run this summer". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 June 2017. 
  75. ^ Sodha, Sonia. "Is Finland's basic universal income a solution to automation, fewer jobs and lower wages?". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 June 2017. 
  76. ^
  77. ^ Van Parijs, Philippe (ed.). "Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform", London: Verso, 1992
  78. ^ Ailsa McKay, "Why a citizens' basic income? A question of gender equality or gender bias", Work Employment & Society, June 2007, vol. 21 no. 2, pp. 337–348
  79. ^ "Critique of Economic Reason", André Gorz, in: Peter Waterman, Ronaldo Munck, "Labour Worldwide in the Era of Globalisation: Alternative Union Models in the New World Order", Macmillan, London, 1999
  80. ^ "Empire" (PDF).  Michael Hardt – Italian Marxist sociologist Antonio Negri, "Empire", Harvard University Press, 2000, p. 403
  81. ^ Osmo Soininvaara, "Hyvinvointivaltion eloonjäämisoppi" (A survival doctrine for the welfare state), Juva, WSOY, 1994, 298 p, ISBN 951-0-20100-6
  82. ^ Guy Standing and Michael Samson (eds.), "A Basic Income Grant for South Africa", University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town, 2003
  83. ^ Standing, Guy (ed.). "Promoting Income Security as a Right: Europe and North America", Anthem Press, London, 2005
  84. ^ Koch, Hannes (2006-10-25). "800 Euro für jeden? CDUler findet's gut". (in German). Retrieved 2017-04-15. 
  85. ^ "Transcript: Interview with Yanis Varoufakis". The Economist. 31 March 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2016. 
  86. ^ Weller, Chris (May 31, 2016). "Here's why the inventor of the Internet supports basic income". Business Insider. Axel Springer SE. 
  87. ^ "Basic Income at the World Economic Forum of Davos". 
  88. ^ Weller, Chris (May 18, 2016). "A Nobel Prize winner in economics just backed basic income". Business Insider. Axel Springer SE. 
  89. ^ Cord, David J. (July 17, 2014). "Is Finland ready for a basic income?". Helsinki Times. Dream Catcher Oy. 
  90. ^ "Der Unterschied zwischen Mensch und Computer wird in Kürze aufgehoben sein". 
  91. ^ "Götz Werner – 1000 Euro für Jeden (Freiheit Gleichheit Grundeinkommen)". 
  92. ^ "How I learnt to stop worrying and love Basic Income". 
  93. ^ "Mark Zuckerberg supports universal basic income. What is it?". 
  94. ^ "US: Mark Zuckerberg recommends "exploring" UBI at Harvard graduation speech". 
  95. ^ "How the New Flexible Economy is Making Workers' Lives Hell". 
  96. ^ "The Billionaire Founder of eBay Plans to Give Thousands of Kenyans Free Income for 12 Years". 
  97. ^ "Basic Income as a Socialist Project" (PDF). 
  98. ^ "Securing women's citizenship: Indifference and other obstacles – Carole Pateman". Retrieved 2016-12-15. 
  99. ^ Carson, Biz. "The billionaire who wanted to split California into 6 states now has a crazy plan to give everyone $15,000". 
  100. ^ Altman, Sam. "Technology and wealth inequality". 
  101. ^ "VIDEO: Basic Income debated on CNN (Chris Hughes & Eduardo Porter)". 2016-10-31. 
  102. ^ "Joe Rogan and Dan Savage discuss a guaranteed minimum income". 
  103. ^ Murray, Charles (2016) [2006], In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State (Revised and updated ed.), Washington, DC: AEI Press, ISBN 978-1-4422-6071-9 
  104. ^ "Book review: In our hands: A plan to replace the welfare state by Charles Murray" (PDF). February 2007. Retrieved 24 July 2013. 
  105. ^ "Comrade Bill Gross Says the Federal Reserve Should Pay Your Rent". 
  106. ^ "Startup CEO Loves Tech but Fears Millions Will Be Jobless". 
  107. ^ "Can Basic Income Come to America?". 
  108. ^ "A universal basic income is an old idea with modern appeal". 
  109. ^ Strange, Adario (2016-11-05). "Elon Musk thinks universal income is answer to automation taking human jobs". Retrieved 2017-02-06. 
  110. ^ "How To Plan Now For Tomorrow's Robotic Workforce". 
  111. ^ "Paul Vallée – The Boundary Breaker". 
  112. ^ "Quebec's Guy Caron seeking NDP leadership". 
  113. ^ a b "Alberta mayors back guaranteed minimum income". 2016-06-05. 
  114. ^ Coelho, Andre (August 26, 2017). "Member of Congress from Minnesota Keith Ellison endorses Basic Income". Basic Income Earth Network. Retrieved August 27, 2017. 
  115. ^ "Citizen's Basic Income: The Answer is Blowing in Wind" Nuvola-inspired File Icons for MediaWiki-fileicon-doc.pngDOC, Eduardo Matarazzo Suplicy, USBIG 5th Congress, 2006
  116. ^ "Why we need to talk about a basic income". 
  117. ^ "Economic Survey -Volume I". 
  118. ^ "Archbishop Tutu on Basic Income". 
  119. ^ "Turning tax and welfare in New Zealand on its head". Big Kahuna. 2011. Archived from the original on 11 August 2013. Retrieved 24 July 2013. 
  120. ^ "New Zealand is debating a plan to give people free money, no strings attached". 
  121. ^ a b "Two arguments for Basic Income: Thomas Paine (1737–1809) and Thomas Spence (1750–1814)". 
  122. ^ Russell, Bertrand (1919). Proposed Roads to Freedom: Socialism, Anarchism and Syndicalism. H. Holt. 
  123. ^ "Martin Luther King's Economic Dream: A Guaranteed Income for All Americans". 
  124. ^ "Bundestag will Petition zum bedingungslosen Grundeinkommen ohne Diskussion abschließen › Piratenpartei Deutschland". Retrieved 5 June 2016. 
  125. ^ "Spanish Popular initiative for basic income collects 185.000 signatures". 10 October 2015. Retrieved 5 June 2016. 
  126. ^ Ben Schiller 02.05.16 7:00 AM (5 February 2016). "Switzerland Will Hold The World's First Universal Basic Income Referendum | Co.Exist | ideas + impact". Retrieved 5 June 2016. 
  127. ^ "EU Survey: 64% of Europeans in Favour of Basic Income". 23 May 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2016. 
  128. ^ "Basic income and the new universalism". The Next Era. 6 February 2017. Retrieved 25 July 2017. 

Further reading

External links